ML13178A366: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 1 of 10  Outline Submittal Comments ES-401-4 Submitted ES-401-4, Rejected KAs
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                                   Facility Action/Response Outline Submittal Comments ES-401-4           Submitted ES-401-4, Rejected KAs, but not required until test is in final.
, but not required until test is in final.
RO/SRO Admin JPMs Comments Radiation Control   Determine radiological conditions for rescue. Is this   This JPM was modified, so not P.
RO/SRO Admin JPMs Comments Radiation Control OT-3701-ADM_018_RO "Determine radiological conditions for rescue.Is this same as 2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as "P" This JPM was modified, so not "P".
OT-3701-            same as 2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as ADM_018_RO          P Conduct of         Make a 4 hour NRC notification. Is this same as         Added P designation to outline.
Conduct of Operations OT-3701-ADM_320_SRO "Make a 4 hour NRC notification.Is this same as 2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as "P" Added "P" designation to outline.
Operations          2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as P OT-3701-ADM_320_SRO Radiation Control  Is this same as the RO admin JPM? If so, need to add     SRO info was incorporated to make this SRO JPM.
Radiation Control OT-3701-ADM_0 18_ Is this same as the RO admin JPM? If so, need to add something to make it SRO.
OT-3701-            something to make it SRO.
SRO info was incor porated to make this SRO JPM.
ADM_018_
RO/SRO CR/IP System JPMs Comments   No comments.
RO/SRO CR/IP System JPMs Comments No comments.
Scenario D
Scenario D-1 Comments No low power       No low power scenario (around 5% power). Had low         The spare is a low power scenario if needed.
-1 Comments No low power scenario submitted.
scenario            power scenario on 2009 and 2010 ILEs (reduce submitted.          predictability).
No low power scenario (around 5% power).
TS calls for SROs   ES-301-5 requires two TS calls for SROs. Dont count related TS for same call, want separate TSs. ORMs arent TSs.
Had low power scenario on 2009 and 2010 ILEs (reduce predictability)
Scenario 1         Note: Recount M for ES-301-5, deleted M from Events 6 and 7.
. The spare is a low power scenario if needed.
Event 1, N-BOP     Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just     Start sets up degradation of pump.
TS calls for SROs ES-301-5 requires two TS calls for SROs. Don't count "related TS" for same call, want separate TSs.
turn a switch and observe start.
ORMs aren't TSs.
Event 4 C-BOP       What is significance of the HPCI initiation? Does the     Water injected, small power change.
Scenario 1 Note: Recount "M" for ES
injection valve open?
-301-5, deleted M from Events 6 and 7.
Event 5 C-BOP       Are there significant actions for evaluation?             Isolate steam to SJAE, isolate O/G, plant shutdown.
Event 1, N
Event 6 I-ATC       How is this an instrument failure for the ATC? He cant  Mode switch fails, hits ARI to scram.
-BOP A re there sufficient actions for evaluation
do anything about it. Only takes compensatory actions to identify loss of level indication.
? Not just turn a switch and observe start.
1 of 10
Start sets up degradation of pump.
Event 4 C-BOP What is significance of the HPCI initiation? Does the injection valve open?
Water injected, small power change.
Event 5 C-BOP Are there significant actions for evaluation?
Isolate steam to SJAE, isolate O/G, plant shutdown.
Event 6 I-ATC How is this an instrument failure for the ATC? He can't do anything about it. Only takes compensatory actions to identify loss of level indication.
Mode switch fails, hits ARI to scram.


NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 2 of 10 Event 6 C-ATC Minimum actions for ATC to take to insert the rods
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                                   Facility Action/Response Event 6 C-ATC       Minimum actions for ATC to take to insert the rods.      RPS failure.
. Already had ATWS in Scenario 2 and 3.
Already had ATWS in Scenario 2 and 3.
RPS failure.
Event 7 C-BOP       Are there significant actions for evaluation? What is     Procedure compliance competency.
Event 7 C-BOP Are there significant actions for evaluation? What is significance if no action taken?
significance if no action taken?
Procedure compliance competency.
Scenario 2 Event 1, N-BOP     Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other pump.
Scenario 2   Event 1, N-BOP Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other pump. Event 3, C
Event 3, C-ATC     Suppose ATC does nothing, or very minimal actions?       Must start CBP within 31/2 min or procedure directs What is significance of one CBP trip?                    plant scram (decreasing hot surge tank level)
-ATC Suppose ATC does nothing, or very minimal actions? What is significance of one CBP trip?
Event 4 C-BOP       Make sure there are sufficient actions for evaluation. Must start S/B NCC Pp, if not RRP temp increases.
Must start CBP within 31/2 min or procedure directs plant scram (decreasing hot surge tank level)
What is significance if no action taken and the pump trips?
Event 4 C-BOP Make sure there are sufficient actions for evaluation. What is significance if no action taken and the pump trips? Must start S/B NCC Pp, if not RRP temp increases.
Event 5 C-BOP,     Why are both given credit for the same failure? Which     BOP shift busses; ATC                position is responsible for the bus trip and restoration? ATC reset half scram, delete C Wont give TS credit for entering ORM 6.3.1 Testing       Lose RP sampling-4 hr alternative method of Requirement 5.                                            sampling.
Event 5 C-BOP, ATC Why are both given credit for the same failure? Which position is responsible for the bus trip and restoration?
Event 8             Not M(All), only compensatory action for the major       Deleted M.
BOP shift busses; ATC reset half scram, delete "C" Won't give TS credit for entering ORM 6.3.1 Testing Requirement 5.
transient.
Lose RP sampling
Scenario 3 Event 1, N-BOP     Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just     More than just turn switch, must observe discharge turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other     valve, stop at correct position.
-4 hr alternative method of sampling. Event 8 Not M(All), only compensatory action for the major transient.
pump.
Deleted "M".
Event 3, C-BOP     Suppose BOP does nothing, or very minimal actions,       Fan wont trip, ARP tells operator to shift fans.
Scenario 3   Event 1, N
what is significance? Does BOP have to start another DW cooler?
-BOP Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other pump. More than just turn switch, must observe discharge valve, stop at correct position.
Event 4, I-ATC,     Wont give TS credit for entering ORM 6.2.1. Cant        ORM 6.2.1 is RC&IC (rod block); second TS is RPS.
Event 3, C
SRO, TS-SRO        take credit for a second TS for same event equipment. Add another TS. ORM=Operations Requirement Manual Event 5, C-ATC     How is RRP downshift a component failure? He cant        Have to insert CRAM rods.
-BOP Suppose BOP does nothing, or very minimal actions, what is significance? Does BOP have to start another DW cooler?
do anything about it. What significant actions does the ATC take?
Fan won't trip, ARP tells operator to shift fans.
Event 6 C-ATC       What is the C? ATWS?                                     Failure to scram, OPRMs fail to scram. Have to 2 of 10
Event 4, I
-ATC, SRO, TS-SRO Won't give TS credit for entering ORM 6.2.1. Can't take credit for a second TS for same event equipment. ORM 6.2.1 is RC&IC (rod block); second TS is RPS. Add another TS. ORM=Operations Requirement Manual Event 5, C
-ATC How is RRP downshift a component failure? He can't do anything about it. What significant actions does the ATC take? Have to insert CRAM rods.
Event 6 C-ATC What is the C? ATWS?
Failure to scram, OPRMs fail to scram. Have to NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 3 of 10 initiate a scram.
Event 7 M-All ,  C-BOP Why is this C for BOP? What significant actions does he take?  Suppose he takes no actions, what is significance?
RHR A fails to initiate, will have to start with H/S.
Event 8 M-ALL ED is a compensatory actions, not major transient.
Delete "M" Event 9 C-BOP What is significance of the CRD pump trip and recovery?  Suppose BOP doesn't recover pump?
What are the significant actions taken to recover the CRD pump? Won't be able to drive rods without CRD Pp.
Proposed Submittal Comments RO Admin JPM Comments  Conduct of Ops, 2.1.18 Perform ATC Hourly Walkdown Where is the 'Administrative' component of the task? During validation, added questions to cues.
Conduct of Ops, 2.1.25 Determine Time to Boil and Core Uncovery Which graphs in PDB
-A016 are used for in
-vessel  after refueling is completed?
Step #3 - What is the acceptable accuracy for this critical step? (~8 hrs + or
- What?)
Step #4 - The acceptable tolerance for the acceptable accuracy may be too large.  (44 hrs too high; 43.5 is reasonable for graph readability.)
The graph labeled " After Discharge of 177 Fuel Bundles". 8 hrs only.


Changed to "42.5
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                                Facility Action/Response initiate a scram.
-43.5 hrs".
Event 7 M-All,      Why is this C for BOP? What significant actions does  RHR A fails to initiate, will have to start with H/S.
Equipment Control, 2.2.41 Determine Necessary Isolation for Fire Protection Valve Is this tasking following a normal plant process?
C-BOP              he take? Suppose he takes no actions, what is significance?
Is the applicant actually being asked to develop a clearance (or tagout) to isolate the leak?
Event 8 M-ALL      ED is a compensatory actions, not major transient. Delete M Event 9 C-BOP      What is significance of the CRD pump trip and          Wont be able to drive rods without CRD Pp.
Trying to get isolation so pumps can be restarted. Tagout to follow.
recovery? Suppose BOP doesnt recover pump?
Radiation Control, 2.3.7 Determine Does the plant initial Rx power level need to be specified?
What are the significant actions taken to recover the CRD pump?
No.
Proposed Submittal Comments RO Admin JPM Comments Conduct of Ops,    Where is the Administrative component of the        During validation, added questions to cues.
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 4 of 10 Radiological Conditions for Rescue  The first 3 steps of the JPM should be tied directly to the 'tasking' requirement, i.e. 'In the vicinity of the injured person, what is the highest general area dose rate?'
2.1.18 Perform      task?
Revised JPM to use readings in direct path to injured person. S RO Admin JPM Comments  Conduct of Ops, 2.1.18 Make 4-hour Notification This JPM is designated as 'Time Critical' because of the 4-hour reportability time limit for the valid RPS actuation. Since the applicant will be performing only a portion of the time critical activity, with the recognition of meeting the reportability requirement and filling out only a part of the Event Notification form, and the fact that the JPM validated time was 20 minutes, this is
ATC Hourly Walkdown Conduct of Ops,    Which graphs in PDB-A016 are used for in-vessel        The graph labeled  After Discharge of 177 Fuel 2.1.25 Determine    after refueling is completed?                          Bundles.
Time to Boil and Core Uncovery      Step #3 - What is the acceptable accuracy for          8 hrs only.
this critical step? (~8 hrs + or - What?)
Changed to 42.5-43.5 hrs.
Step #4 - The acceptable tolerance for the acceptable accuracy may be too large. (44 hrs too high; 43.5 is reasonable for graph readability.)
Equipment          Is this tasking following a normal plant process?     Trying to get isolation so pumps can be restarted.
Control, 2.2.41    Is the applicant actually being asked to develop a     Tagout to follow.
Determine          clearance (or tagout) to isolate the leak?
Necessary Isolation for Fire Protection Valve Radiation Control, Does the plant initial Rx power level need to be       No.
2.3.7 Determine    specified?
3 of 10


not a 'Time Critical JPM.'
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                                Facility Action/Response Radiological Conditions for      The first 3 steps of the JPM should be tied            Revised JPM to use readings in direct path to injured Rescue              directly to the tasking requirement, i.e. In the    person.
vicinity of the injured person, what is the highest general area dose rate?
SRO Admin JPM Comments Conduct of Ops,    This JPM is designated as Time Critical because      Not Time Critical JPM.
2.1.18 Make 4-      of the 4-hour reportability time limit for the valid hour Notification  RPS actuation. Since the applicant will be performing only a portion of the time critical activity, with the recognition of meeting the reportability requirement and filling out only a part of the Event Notification form, and the fact that the JPM validated time was 20 minutes, this is not a Time Critical JPM.
The fact that the initiating cue tells the applicant  Revised Cue: assess the situation and perform the to evaluate the plant conditions for reportability    required activities.
may be cueing the applicant to the correct answer of the first critical step.
Equipment          Establish that the plant is in Mode 1 as an initial    Initial Conditions changed to establish that the plant is Control, 2.2.41    condition and then let the applicant decide proper    in Mode 1. Deleted Step 4 cue.
Determine          required actions without a Cue to the applicant Necessary          in Step 4.
Isolation for Fire Protection Valve and Evaluate Impact Emergency Plan,    The Initial Conditions need to clearly state          Modified Initial Conditions to be 2 cues.
2.4.38 Perform      whether or not this is the initial classification for Classification and  the event, and if so, when (ie, timeline) the If Necessary,      indications were available to the crew for Notification 4 of 10


The fact that the initiating cue tells the applicant to evaluate the plant conditions for reportability may be 'cueing' the applicant to the correct answer of the first critical step.
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                               Facility Action/Response exceeding an EAL threshold (i.e. Site Area based upon RPV level). If this will be the initial Emergency Declaration if must be made within 15 minutes of the indications being available, not 15 minutes from when the initial conditions are read.
Not Time Critical JPM.
RO/SRO CR/IP System JPM Comments Sim a OT-3701-     This ALT Path may not be very discriminating         Modified JPM to require applicant to increase drive C11_513;            since the scenario has the applicant remain in the   water pressure in addition to double-clutching.
Revised Cue: "-assess the situation and perform the required activities."
Withdraw Control    same procedure, simply double clutch vice Rods                adjusting Drive Pressure, and is terminated as soon as the rod moves following the first attempt.
Equipment Control, 2.2.41 Determine Necessary Isolation for Fire Protection Valve and Evaluate Impact Establish that the plant is in Mode 1 as an initial condition and then let the applicant decide proper required actions without a 'Cue' to the applicant in Step 4.
Initial Conditions changed to establish that the plant is in Mode 1. Deleted Step 4 cue.
Emergency Plan, 2.4.38 Perform Classification and If Necessary, Notification The Initial Conditions need to clearly state whether or not this is the initial classification for the event, and if so, when (ie, timeline) the indications were available to the crew for Modified Initial Conditions to be 2 cues.
 
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 5 of 10 exceeding an EAL threshold (i.e. Site Area based upon RPV level). If this will be the initial  
'Emergency Declaration' if must be made within 15 minutes of the indications being available, not 15 minutes from when the initial conditions are read. RO/SRO CR/IP System JPM Comments Sim a OT-3701-C11_513; Withdraw Control Rods This ALT Path may not be very discriminating since the scenario has the applicant remain in the same procedure, simply double clutch vice adjusting Drive Pressure, and is terminated as soon as the rod moves following the first attempt.
This would be more discriminating if the applicant is required to adjust Drive Pressure and then required to subsequently lower the Drive Pressure prior to attempting to move another gang step.
This would be more discriminating if the applicant is required to adjust Drive Pressure and then required to subsequently lower the Drive Pressure prior to attempting to move another gang step.
Evaluator should wait for the applicant to recommend using 'Alternate Controls' before providing direction.
Evaluator should wait for the applicant to           Modified cue to do this.
 
recommend using Alternate Controls before providing direction.
What is the required action if 'double clutching' results in overshooting required notch position?
What is the required action if double clutching Added note to step 11 regarding FTI-B0002.
 
results in overshooting required notch position?
The initial conditions are different on the 'Cue Sheet' than stated in the 'Setup Sheet.'
The initial conditions are different on the Cue     Matched Initial Conditions to cue sheet.
Modified JPM to require applicant to increase drive water pressure in addition to double
Sheet than stated in the Setup Sheet.
-clutching.
Sim b. OT-3701-     What makes this a New JPM?                         EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of E51_006 Lineup                                                            2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this RCIC to control                                                          previously.
Modified cue to do this.
RPV level per EOP-SPI 6.6 5 of 10
 
Added "note" to step 11 regarding FTI
-B0002. Matched Initial Conditions to cue sheet.
Sim b. OT-3701- E51_006 Lineup  RCIC to control RPV level per EOP-SPI 6.6 What makes this a 'New' JPM?
EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of 2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this previously.
 
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 6 of 10 SPI 6.6 Sim c. OT-3701- B21_009 Open  MSIVs What makes this a 'New' JPM?
 
Step 4 of JPM:  When and why would N22
-F455  already be shut?
EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of 2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this previously.
1N22-F455 is closed IAW IOI-0003, Power Changes (our at power integrated operating procedure) and would not be normally opened until depressurizing the RPV in IOI
-0004, Shutdown.
Sim d. OT-3701-E12_506 Re-establish SDC Why is this an ALT Path JPM?  The scenario has the applicant remain in the same procedure, even the same section of the procedure.
 
(Cueing) The cue to secure the running RHR
 
pump should only be given if the applicant recommends the action due to the P&L limit of 8 seconds max at shutoff head.  (This is a critical
 
step and we should not be telling the applicant
 
how to complete it successfully.)
 
Step 7 of JPM:  Need to see the Attachment 42 to understand why this could not be accomplished by the applicant. Even during an emergency, the applicant should ensure pre
-start data is obtained if conditions permit.  (Maybe simply cueing the applicant that another RO has completed recording pre
-start data is adequate, but it still needs to be done prior to starting the pump.)
 
Again, the initial conditions are different on the
'Cue Sheet' than stated in the 'Setup Sheet.'
Deviation from Normal mode, SDC is required, and the applicant needs to select the correct subsection of the procedure.
Revised cue to force applicant to make decision.
 
Will have Att 42 filled in ahead of time and given to the applicant as part of the cue.
 
Corrected.
 
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 7 of 10 Sim e. OT-3701-R43_501 Shutdown Div. 2 Diesel Generator Again, this is not a discriminating ALT Path?  The scenario has the applicant direct the operator in the plant to take one action to open an electrical disconnect, and then the JPM is cued as complete once the action is reported complete.
The applicant does not have any manipulations to perform as part of the alternate path.  (As a minimum, does the 'Unit Available Light' go out in the simulator and should the applicant observe this to ensure that the ordered action produces the required effect?)
Why is the Reactor Operator doing this evolution  and not the Balance of Plant Operator?  What are the plant initial conditions?
 
Why is the 'Task' to shutdown the SBDG to Standby Readiness (Remote) and the 'Task Standard' to shutdown the SBDG to Standby
 
Readiness from the control room and then put in  PTL? (Conflicting?)  Also, the initial conditions
 
are not reasonable if the SBDG is properly unloaded following the maintenance run.  (Speed and voltage should be higher than as found.
Modified JPM to do Normal or Emergency shutdown upon discovery of failure to auto trip RO is generic term, we use ATC, BOP and FS for Perry. JPM is independent of plant initial conditions
. Changed task to eliminate "to Standby".
Sim f. OT-3701-D17-001 Startup DW ARM Why must this JPM be performed in the Control room?  JPM Step 7 should have a second part added to have the applicant correctly verify that no alarms are present so that the next step (Step 8) for the IV may be identified as required.
Changed to simulator. Modified as suggested.
 
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 8 of 10 Sim g. OT-3701-P41-001 Shift Service Water Pumps JPM Step 1 states that the applicant will contact an NLO to perform procedure step 7.1.2; is that the correct procedure step?  Should it be 7.1.1.a?
(Editing) Corrected.
Sim h. OT-3701-M25-5 01 Shift CR Ventilation to ER JPM Step 1
- If the 'A' train is tagged out, should M25-S7 actually be repositioned?
 
JPM Step 2
- Why wouldn't the applicant initially place the 'B' train Initiate Switch to 'STOP?'
Yes  He would ask the US for direction to perform Supplemental Actions.
IP i. OT-3701-P54-5 0 2 Emergency Run of Motor Fire Pump Again, same question about discriminating ALT Path. JPMs should have realistic initial conditions and tasking, i.e., if the Motor Fire Pump did not start with lowering fire header pressure, wouldn't the control room try to start it and then when it trips, call someone to go perform an emergency start?  This JPM may then become too simple to be used on an exam.
 
If this JPM is written as an ALT Path, and the Motor Fire Pump will always trip after 10 seconds if started using the START push button on H13
- P970, why is JPM Step 1 a 'Critical Step?'
 
If JPM Step 1 is not a 'Critical Step,' then the JPM only has 1 simple, single action, 'Critical Step,' and is no longer acceptable.
Replaced JPM.
IP j. OT-3701-T23-0 0 4 Containment Closure This is the RCA In
-Plant JPM.
All 4 of the JPM Steps (steps are mis
-numbered  and there are only 4) are written as 'Critical
 
Steps,' with the indicated cues stating that all airlocks, doors, floor hatches, and shield blocks Replaced JPM.


NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 9 of 10 are as found upon verification. If the plant is on
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                               Facility Action/Response SPI 6.6 Sim c. OT-3701-    What makes this a New JPM?                          EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of B21_009 Open                                                              2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this MSIVs                                                                    previously.
- line when this JPM is performed, there will not be any required actions by the applicant, therefore
Step 4 of JPM: When and why would N22-F455            1N22-F455 is closed IAW IOI-0003, Power Changes (our at power integrated operating procedure) and already be shut?
would not be normally opened until depressurizing the RPV in IOI-0004, Shutdown.
Sim d. OT-3701-     Why is this an ALT Path JPM? The scenario has        Deviation from Normal mode, SDC is required, and E12_506 Re-        the applicant remain in the same procedure, even      the applicant needs to select the correct subsection of establish SDC      the same section of the procedure.                    the procedure.
(Cueing) The cue to secure the running RHR            Revised cue to force applicant to make decision.
pump should only be given if the applicant recommends the action due to the P&L limit of 8 seconds max at shutoff head. (This is a critical step and we should not be telling the applicant how to complete it successfully.)
Step 7 of JPM: Need to see the Attachment 42 to      Will have Att 42 filled in ahead of time and given to understand why this could not be accomplished        the applicant as part of the cue.
by the applicant. Even during an emergency, the applicant should ensure pre-start data is obtained if conditions permit. (Maybe simply cueing the applicant that another RO has completed recording pre-start data is adequate, but it still needs to be done prior to starting the pump.)
Again, the initial conditions are different on the    Corrected.
Cue Sheet than stated in the Setup Sheet.
6 of 10


no 'Critical Steps.'  The JPM becomes unacceptable as written.
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                                Facility Action/Response Sim e. OT-3701-     Again, this is not a discriminating ALT Path? The      Modified JPM to do Normal or Emergency shutdown R43_501            scenario has the applicant direct the operator in      upon discovery of failure to auto trip Shutdown Div. 2    the plant to take one action to open an electrical Diesel Generator    disconnect, and then the JPM is cued as complete once the action is reported complete.
IP k. OT-3701-R10-3 0 3 Shed Non-essential Divisional Loads This JPM is designated as 'Time Critical' because off-normal procedure ONI
The applicant does not have any manipulations to perform as part of the alternate path. (As a minimum, does the Unit Available Light go out in the simulator and should the applicant observe this to ensure that the ordered action produces the required effect?)
-R10 requires the load shed be accomplished within 3 hours. Since the applicant will be performing only a portion of ONI
Why is the Reactor Operator doing this evolution      RO is generic term, we use ATC, BOP and FS for and not the Balance of Plant Operator? What are        Perry. JPM is independent of plant initial conditions.
- R10, with other personnel doing other parts, and the JPM validated time was 26 minutes, this is
the plant initial conditions?
Changed task to eliminate to Standby.
Why is the Task to shutdown the SBDG to Standby Readiness (Remote) and the Task Standard to shutdown the SBDG to Standby Readiness from the control room and then put in PTL? (Conflicting?) Also, the initial conditions are not reasonable if the SBDG is properly unloaded following the maintenance run. (Speed and voltage should be higher than as found.
Sim f. OT-3701-    Why must this JPM be performed in the Control          Changed to simulator.
D17-001 Startup    room?
DW ARM JPM Step 7 should have a second part added to          Modified as suggested.
have the applicant correctly verify that no alarms are present so that the next step (Step 8) for the IV may be identified as required.
7 of 10


not a 'Time Critical JPM.'
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                              Facility Action/Response Sim g. OT-3701-    JPM Step 1 states that the applicant will contact    Corrected.
P41-001 Shift      an NLO to perform procedure step 7.1.2; is that Service Water      the correct procedure step? Should it be 7.1.1.a?
Pumps              (Editing)
Sim h. OT-3701-    JPM Step 1 - If the A train is tagged out, should  Yes M25-501 Shift CR    M25-S7 actually be repositioned?
Ventilation to ER JPM Step 2 - Why wouldnt the applicant initially    He would ask the US for direction to perform place the B train Initiate Switch to STOP?        Supplemental Actions.
IP i. OT-3701-P54- Again, same question about discriminating ALT          Replaced JPM.
502 Emergency      Path. JPMs should have realistic initial Run of Motor Fire conditions and tasking, i.e., if the Motor Fire Pump                Pump did not start with lowering fire header pressure, wouldnt the control room try to start it and then when it trips, call someone to go perform an emergency start? This JPM may then become too simple to be used on an exam.
If this JPM is written as an ALT Path, and the Motor Fire Pump will always trip after 10 seconds if started using the START push button on H13-P970, why is JPM Step 1 a Critical Step?
If JPM Step 1 is not a Critical Step, then the JPM only has 1 simple, single action, Critical Step, and is no longer acceptable.
IP j. OT-3701-T23-  This is the RCA In-Plant JPM.                        Replaced JPM.
004 Containment    All 4 of the JPM Steps (steps are mis-numbered Closure            and there are only 4) are written as Critical Steps, with the indicated cues stating that all airlocks, doors, floor hatches, and shield blocks 8 of 10


How is the applicant assessed on identifying the  
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                              Facility Action/Response are as found upon verification. If the plant is on-line when this JPM is performed, there will not be any required actions by the applicant, therefore no Critical Steps. The JPM becomes unacceptable as written.
'non-essential divisional bus loads' such that the required tasking is complete prior to ending the JPM? (Procedure Steps 1.9  
IP k. OT-3701-      This JPM is designated as Time Critical because    Add to cue that SBO occurred 2 hrs 15 min ago.
- 1.13) Add to cue that SBO occurred 2 hrs 15 min ago.
R10-303 Shed        off-normal procedure ONI-R10 requires the load Non-essential      shed be accomplished within 3 hours. Since the Divisional Loads    applicant will be performing only a portion of ONI-R10, with other personnel doing other parts, and the JPM validated time was 26 minutes, this is not a Time Critical JPM.
Added additional step.
How is the applicant assessed on identifying the     Added additional step.
Scenario D
non-essential divisional bus loads such that the required tasking is complete prior to ending the JPM? (Procedure Steps 1.9 - 1.13)
-1 , D-2 Comments Scenario 1   Event 3, C-BOP , TS Does the D
Scenario D-1, D-2 Comments Scenario 1 Event 3, C-BOP,     Does the D-2 need documentation of expected           Added documentation.
-2 need documentation of expected SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
TS                  SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
Added documentation.
Event 7, C-BOP     Does not provide enough response by the               Added 3 more SRV failures.
Event 7, C
applicant to be a creditable C failure.
-BOP Does not provide enough response by the applicant to be a creditable 'C' failure.
Critical Task 2     Are at least 2 SRVs enough for satisfying an       5 per EOP bases.
Added 3 more SRV failures.
ED event?
Critical Task 2 Are 'at least 2 SRVs' enough for satisfying an  
Critical Task 3     How long will it take to inject to the RPV to get     Approximately 8 min.
'ED' event?
level above the MSLs? (Noted by RPV pressure increase of 10# and SRV temp lowering)
5 per EOP bases.
Scenario 2 Event 6, M-All; C- What is RD? Should be ED? (Last page-            Corrected.
Critical Task 3 How long will it take to inject to the RPV to get level above the MSLs? (Noted by RPV pressure increase of 10# and SRV temp lowering) Approximately 8 min.
BOP                Editing) 9 of 10
Scenario 2   Event 6 , M-All; C-BOP What is 'RD?Should be 'ED?(Last page
-Editing) Corrected.


NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 10 of 10 Event 8 Is this really separate from Event #7?
NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment                               Facility Action/Response Event 8             Is this really separate from Event #7?                 Added LPCS start failure to Term/Prev in Event 6.
Added LPCS start failure to Term/Prev in Event 6.
Scenario 3 Event 3, TS         Does the D-2 need documentation of expected           Added clarification of expected actions.
Scenario 3   Event 3, TS Does the D
SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
-2 need documentation of expected SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
Does the described action constitute a C failure     No.
Does the described action constitute a 'C' failure for the BOP?
for the BOP?
Added clarification of expected actions.
Event 4, C-BOP     Does the D-2 need documentation of expected           Added documentation.
No. Event 4, C
SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
-BOP Does the D
Critical Task 6     Why is this a critical task?                           Critical for adequate core cooling.
-2 need documentation of expected SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?
10 of 10}}
Added documentation.
Critical Task 6 Why is this a critical task?
Critical for adequate core cooling.}}

Latest revision as of 17:32, 4 November 2019

2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Outline and Operating Test Comments Rev 1
ML13178A366
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/2013
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Bielby, M.
Shared Package
ML11354A269 List:
References
Download: ML13178A366 (10)


Text

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Outline Submittal Comments ES-401-4 Submitted ES-401-4, Rejected KAs, but not required until test is in final.

RO/SRO Admin JPMs Comments Radiation Control Determine radiological conditions for rescue. Is this This JPM was modified, so not P.

OT-3701- same as 2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as ADM_018_RO P Conduct of Make a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> NRC notification. Is this same as Added P designation to outline.

Operations 2009 ILE RO Admin JPM? If so, identify as P OT-3701-ADM_320_SRO Radiation Control Is this same as the RO admin JPM? If so, need to add SRO info was incorporated to make this SRO JPM.

OT-3701- something to make it SRO.

ADM_018_

RO/SRO CR/IP System JPMs Comments No comments.

Scenario D-1 Comments No low power No low power scenario (around 5% power). Had low The spare is a low power scenario if needed.

scenario power scenario on 2009 and 2010 ILEs (reduce submitted. predictability).

TS calls for SROs ES-301-5 requires two TS calls for SROs. Dont count related TS for same call, want separate TSs. ORMs arent TSs.

Scenario 1 Note: Recount M for ES-301-5, deleted M from Events 6 and 7.

Event 1, N-BOP Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just Start sets up degradation of pump.

turn a switch and observe start.

Event 4 C-BOP What is significance of the HPCI initiation? Does the Water injected, small power change.

injection valve open?

Event 5 C-BOP Are there significant actions for evaluation? Isolate steam to SJAE, isolate O/G, plant shutdown.

Event 6 I-ATC How is this an instrument failure for the ATC? He cant Mode switch fails, hits ARI to scram.

do anything about it. Only takes compensatory actions to identify loss of level indication.

1 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Event 6 C-ATC Minimum actions for ATC to take to insert the rods. RPS failure.

Already had ATWS in Scenario 2 and 3.

Event 7 C-BOP Are there significant actions for evaluation? What is Procedure compliance competency.

significance if no action taken?

Scenario 2 Event 1, N-BOP Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other pump.

Event 3, C-ATC Suppose ATC does nothing, or very minimal actions? Must start CBP within 31/2 min or procedure directs What is significance of one CBP trip? plant scram (decreasing hot surge tank level)

Event 4 C-BOP Make sure there are sufficient actions for evaluation. Must start S/B NCC Pp, if not RRP temp increases.

What is significance if no action taken and the pump trips?

Event 5 C-BOP, Why are both given credit for the same failure? Which BOP shift busses; ATC position is responsible for the bus trip and restoration? ATC reset half scram, delete C Wont give TS credit for entering ORM 6.3.1 Testing Lose RP sampling-4 hr alternative method of Requirement 5. sampling.

Event 8 Not M(All), only compensatory action for the major Deleted M.

transient.

Scenario 3 Event 1, N-BOP Are there sufficient actions for evaluation? Not just More than just turn switch, must observe discharge turn a switch and observe start, then trip off other valve, stop at correct position.

pump.

Event 3, C-BOP Suppose BOP does nothing, or very minimal actions, Fan wont trip, ARP tells operator to shift fans.

what is significance? Does BOP have to start another DW cooler?

Event 4, I-ATC, Wont give TS credit for entering ORM 6.2.1. Cant ORM 6.2.1 is RC&IC (rod block); second TS is RPS.

SRO, TS-SRO take credit for a second TS for same event equipment. Add another TS. ORM=Operations Requirement Manual Event 5, C-ATC How is RRP downshift a component failure? He cant Have to insert CRAM rods.

do anything about it. What significant actions does the ATC take?

Event 6 C-ATC What is the C? ATWS? Failure to scram, OPRMs fail to scram. Have to 2 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response initiate a scram.

Event 7 M-All, Why is this C for BOP? What significant actions does RHR A fails to initiate, will have to start with H/S.

C-BOP he take? Suppose he takes no actions, what is significance?

Event 8 M-ALL ED is a compensatory actions, not major transient. Delete M Event 9 C-BOP What is significance of the CRD pump trip and Wont be able to drive rods without CRD Pp.

recovery? Suppose BOP doesnt recover pump?

What are the significant actions taken to recover the CRD pump?

Proposed Submittal Comments RO Admin JPM Comments Conduct of Ops, Where is the Administrative component of the During validation, added questions to cues.

2.1.18 Perform task?

ATC Hourly Walkdown Conduct of Ops, Which graphs in PDB-A016 are used for in-vessel The graph labeled After Discharge of 177 Fuel 2.1.25 Determine after refueling is completed? Bundles.

Time to Boil and Core Uncovery Step #3 - What is the acceptable accuracy for 8 hrs only.

this critical step? (~8 hrs + or - What?)

Changed to 42.5-43.5 hrs.

Step #4 - The acceptable tolerance for the acceptable accuracy may be too large. (44 hrs too high; 43.5 is reasonable for graph readability.)

Equipment Is this tasking following a normal plant process? Trying to get isolation so pumps can be restarted.

Control, 2.2.41 Is the applicant actually being asked to develop a Tagout to follow.

Determine clearance (or tagout) to isolate the leak?

Necessary Isolation for Fire Protection Valve Radiation Control, Does the plant initial Rx power level need to be No.

2.3.7 Determine specified?

3 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Radiological Conditions for The first 3 steps of the JPM should be tied Revised JPM to use readings in direct path to injured Rescue directly to the tasking requirement, i.e. In the person.

vicinity of the injured person, what is the highest general area dose rate?

SRO Admin JPM Comments Conduct of Ops, This JPM is designated as Time Critical because Not Time Critical JPM.

2.1.18 Make 4- of the 4-hour reportability time limit for the valid hour Notification RPS actuation. Since the applicant will be performing only a portion of the time critical activity, with the recognition of meeting the reportability requirement and filling out only a part of the Event Notification form, and the fact that the JPM validated time was 20 minutes, this is not a Time Critical JPM.

The fact that the initiating cue tells the applicant Revised Cue: assess the situation and perform the to evaluate the plant conditions for reportability required activities.

may be cueing the applicant to the correct answer of the first critical step.

Equipment Establish that the plant is in Mode 1 as an initial Initial Conditions changed to establish that the plant is Control, 2.2.41 condition and then let the applicant decide proper in Mode 1. Deleted Step 4 cue.

Determine required actions without a Cue to the applicant Necessary in Step 4.

Isolation for Fire Protection Valve and Evaluate Impact Emergency Plan, The Initial Conditions need to clearly state Modified Initial Conditions to be 2 cues.

2.4.38 Perform whether or not this is the initial classification for Classification and the event, and if so, when (ie, timeline) the If Necessary, indications were available to the crew for Notification 4 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response exceeding an EAL threshold (i.e. Site Area based upon RPV level). If this will be the initial Emergency Declaration if must be made within 15 minutes of the indications being available, not 15 minutes from when the initial conditions are read.

RO/SRO CR/IP System JPM Comments Sim a OT-3701- This ALT Path may not be very discriminating Modified JPM to require applicant to increase drive C11_513; since the scenario has the applicant remain in the water pressure in addition to double-clutching.

Withdraw Control same procedure, simply double clutch vice Rods adjusting Drive Pressure, and is terminated as soon as the rod moves following the first attempt.

This would be more discriminating if the applicant is required to adjust Drive Pressure and then required to subsequently lower the Drive Pressure prior to attempting to move another gang step.

Evaluator should wait for the applicant to Modified cue to do this.

recommend using Alternate Controls before providing direction.

What is the required action if double clutching Added note to step 11 regarding FTI-B0002.

results in overshooting required notch position?

The initial conditions are different on the Cue Matched Initial Conditions to cue sheet.

Sheet than stated in the Setup Sheet.

Sim b. OT-3701- What makes this a New JPM? EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of E51_006 Lineup 2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this RCIC to control previously.

RPV level per EOP-SPI 6.6 5 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response SPI 6.6 Sim c. OT-3701- What makes this a New JPM? EOP SPI 6.6 is a new procedure, created in June of B21_009 Open 2012. Licensee did not have a JPM covering this MSIVs previously.

Step 4 of JPM: When and why would N22-F455 1N22-F455 is closed IAW IOI-0003, Power Changes (our at power integrated operating procedure) and already be shut?

would not be normally opened until depressurizing the RPV in IOI-0004, Shutdown.

Sim d. OT-3701- Why is this an ALT Path JPM? The scenario has Deviation from Normal mode, SDC is required, and E12_506 Re- the applicant remain in the same procedure, even the applicant needs to select the correct subsection of establish SDC the same section of the procedure. the procedure.

(Cueing) The cue to secure the running RHR Revised cue to force applicant to make decision.

pump should only be given if the applicant recommends the action due to the P&L limit of 8 seconds max at shutoff head. (This is a critical step and we should not be telling the applicant how to complete it successfully.)

Step 7 of JPM: Need to see the Attachment 42 to Will have Att 42 filled in ahead of time and given to understand why this could not be accomplished the applicant as part of the cue.

by the applicant. Even during an emergency, the applicant should ensure pre-start data is obtained if conditions permit. (Maybe simply cueing the applicant that another RO has completed recording pre-start data is adequate, but it still needs to be done prior to starting the pump.)

Again, the initial conditions are different on the Corrected.

Cue Sheet than stated in the Setup Sheet.

6 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Sim e. OT-3701- Again, this is not a discriminating ALT Path? The Modified JPM to do Normal or Emergency shutdown R43_501 scenario has the applicant direct the operator in upon discovery of failure to auto trip Shutdown Div. 2 the plant to take one action to open an electrical Diesel Generator disconnect, and then the JPM is cued as complete once the action is reported complete.

The applicant does not have any manipulations to perform as part of the alternate path. (As a minimum, does the Unit Available Light go out in the simulator and should the applicant observe this to ensure that the ordered action produces the required effect?)

Why is the Reactor Operator doing this evolution RO is generic term, we use ATC, BOP and FS for and not the Balance of Plant Operator? What are Perry. JPM is independent of plant initial conditions.

the plant initial conditions?

Changed task to eliminate to Standby.

Why is the Task to shutdown the SBDG to Standby Readiness (Remote) and the Task Standard to shutdown the SBDG to Standby Readiness from the control room and then put in PTL? (Conflicting?) Also, the initial conditions are not reasonable if the SBDG is properly unloaded following the maintenance run. (Speed and voltage should be higher than as found.

Sim f. OT-3701- Why must this JPM be performed in the Control Changed to simulator.

D17-001 Startup room?

DW ARM JPM Step 7 should have a second part added to Modified as suggested.

have the applicant correctly verify that no alarms are present so that the next step (Step 8) for the IV may be identified as required.

7 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Sim g. OT-3701- JPM Step 1 states that the applicant will contact Corrected.

P41-001 Shift an NLO to perform procedure step 7.1.2; is that Service Water the correct procedure step? Should it be 7.1.1.a?

Pumps (Editing)

Sim h. OT-3701- JPM Step 1 - If the A train is tagged out, should Yes M25-501 Shift CR M25-S7 actually be repositioned?

Ventilation to ER JPM Step 2 - Why wouldnt the applicant initially He would ask the US for direction to perform place the B train Initiate Switch to STOP? Supplemental Actions.

IP i. OT-3701-P54- Again, same question about discriminating ALT Replaced JPM.

502 Emergency Path. JPMs should have realistic initial Run of Motor Fire conditions and tasking, i.e., if the Motor Fire Pump Pump did not start with lowering fire header pressure, wouldnt the control room try to start it and then when it trips, call someone to go perform an emergency start? This JPM may then become too simple to be used on an exam.

If this JPM is written as an ALT Path, and the Motor Fire Pump will always trip after 10 seconds if started using the START push button on H13-P970, why is JPM Step 1 a Critical Step?

If JPM Step 1 is not a Critical Step, then the JPM only has 1 simple, single action, Critical Step, and is no longer acceptable.

IP j. OT-3701-T23- This is the RCA In-Plant JPM. Replaced JPM.

004 Containment All 4 of the JPM Steps (steps are mis-numbered Closure and there are only 4) are written as Critical Steps, with the indicated cues stating that all airlocks, doors, floor hatches, and shield blocks 8 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response are as found upon verification. If the plant is on-line when this JPM is performed, there will not be any required actions by the applicant, therefore no Critical Steps. The JPM becomes unacceptable as written.

IP k. OT-3701- This JPM is designated as Time Critical because Add to cue that SBO occurred 2 hrs 15 min ago.

R10-303 Shed off-normal procedure ONI-R10 requires the load Non-essential shed be accomplished within 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. Since the Divisional Loads applicant will be performing only a portion of ONI-R10, with other personnel doing other parts, and the JPM validated time was 26 minutes, this is not a Time Critical JPM.

How is the applicant assessed on identifying the Added additional step.

non-essential divisional bus loads such that the required tasking is complete prior to ending the JPM? (Procedure Steps 1.9 - 1.13)

Scenario D-1, D-2 Comments Scenario 1 Event 3, C-BOP, Does the D-2 need documentation of expected Added documentation.

TS SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?

Event 7, C-BOP Does not provide enough response by the Added 3 more SRV failures.

applicant to be a creditable C failure.

Critical Task 2 Are at least 2 SRVs enough for satisfying an 5 per EOP bases.

ED event?

Critical Task 3 How long will it take to inject to the RPV to get Approximately 8 min.

level above the MSLs? (Noted by RPV pressure increase of 10# and SRV temp lowering)

Scenario 2 Event 6, M-All; C- What is RD? Should be ED? (Last page- Corrected.

BOP Editing) 9 of 10

NRC ILE Outline and Operating Test Submittal Comments 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Chief Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Event 8 Is this really separate from Event #7? Added LPCS start failure to Term/Prev in Event 6.

Scenario 3 Event 3, TS Does the D-2 need documentation of expected Added clarification of expected actions.

SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?

Does the described action constitute a C failure No.

for the BOP?

Event 4, C-BOP Does the D-2 need documentation of expected Added documentation.

SRO actions for evaluating TS LCO entry?

Critical Task 6 Why is this a critical task? Critical for adequate core cooling.

10 of 10