ML092290034: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML092290034
| number = ML092290034
| issue date = 08/17/2009
| issue date = 08/17/2009
| title = 08/17/09 - 08/19/09-Meeting Slides for 11th International Seminar on Fire Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and Installations, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: a U.S. Regulatory Perspective
| title = 08/19/09-Meeting Slides for 11th International Seminar on Fire Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and Installations, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: a U.S. Regulatory Perspective
| author name = Klein A R
| author name = Klein A
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective 11th International Seminar on FIRE SAFETY IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND INSTALLATIONS Alexander Klein, PE August 17-19, 2009
 
BACKGROUND
* Fire Protection Regulations
  - Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Section 50.48, Fire protection
  - General Design Criterion (GDC) 3, Fire protection
  - Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979
  - 10 CFR 50.48(c) National Fire Protection Association Standard NFPA 805 2
 
REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE
* Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants
  - NEI 04-02, 04 02 Guidance Guidance for Implementing a Risk Risk-Informed, Informed Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10 CFR 50.48(c)
* NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan
  - SRP Section 9.5.1.1
  - new SRP Section 9.5.1.2 (draft)
* Triennial fire protection inspection procedures 3
 
PILOT PLANTS
* Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
* Oconee Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2, 3)
* Pilot Plant Process
  - status
* NFPA 805 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)
Process 4
 
LESSONS LEARNED
* What are some of the initial lessons learned from the pilot plants?
  - License Amendment Request
  - Review of engineering evaluations
  - Treatment of the risk of prior approved recovery actions
  - Interface between RG 1.205 and RG 1.200 5
 
LEVERAGING NFPA 805 TOOLS
* Reduce regulatory burden
* Address emergent g    issues
* Improve fire risk management
* Use in non-fire protection areas 6
 
PATH FORWARD
* Update regulatory guidance
* Develop inspection procedures
* p Complete  the ppilot p plant p process
* Communicate lessons learned
* Prepare for license amendment requests 7
 
QUESTIONS 8}}

Latest revision as of 00:43, 7 December 2019

08/19/09-Meeting Slides for 11th International Seminar on Fire Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and Installations, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: a U.S. Regulatory Perspective
ML092290034
Person / Time
Site: Oconee, Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/2009
From: Klein A
NRC/NRR/DRA/AFPB
To:
Alex Klein, 415-3477
References
Download: ML092290034 (8)


Text

Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective 11th International Seminar on FIRE SAFETY IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND INSTALLATIONS Alexander Klein, PE August 17-19, 2009

BACKGROUND

  • Fire Protection Regulations

- Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

Section 50.48, Fire protection

- General Design Criterion (GDC) 3, Fire protection

- Appendix R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979

- 10 CFR 50.48(c) National Fire Protection Association Standard NFPA 805 2

REGULATORY INFRASTRUCTURE

- NEI 04-02, 04 02 Guidance Guidance for Implementing a Risk Risk-Informed, Informed Performance-Based Fire Protection Program Under 10 CFR 50.48(c)

- SRP Section 9.5.1.1

- new SRP Section 9.5.1.2 (draft)

  • Triennial fire protection inspection procedures 3

PILOT PLANTS

  • Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
  • Oconee Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1, 2, 3)
  • Pilot Plant Process

- status

Process 4

LESSONS LEARNED

  • What are some of the initial lessons learned from the pilot plants?

- License Amendment Request

- Review of engineering evaluations

- Treatment of the risk of prior approved recovery actions

- Interface between RG 1.205 and RG 1.200 5

LEVERAGING NFPA 805 TOOLS

  • Reduce regulatory burden
  • Address emergent g issues
  • Improve fire risk management
  • Use in non-fire protection areas 6

PATH FORWARD

  • Update regulatory guidance
  • Develop inspection procedures
  • p Complete the ppilot p plant p process
  • Communicate lessons learned
  • Prepare for license amendment requests 7

QUESTIONS 8