ML16357A280: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16357A280
| number = ML16357A280
| issue date = 01/18/2017
| issue date = 01/18/2017
| title = Fermi 2 - Relief from the Requirements of the ASME Code (CAC No. MF7491)
| title = Relief from the Requirements of the ASME Code
| author name = Wrona D J
| author name = Wrona D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| addressee name = Fessler P
| addressee name = Fessler P
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
| project = CAC:MF7491
| project = CAC:MF7491
| stage =  
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Mr. Paul Fessler Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 -210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Ml 48166 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Janurary 18, 2017 SUBJECT: FERMI 2 -RELIEF FOR VRR-014 FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ASME OM CODE (CAC NO. MF7 491) Dear Mr. Fessler: By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 16077A216), DTE Electric Company (the licensee) submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010. Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. As set forth in the enclosed safety evaluation, the NRC staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRC staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010. All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Janurary 18, 2017 Mr. Paul Fessler Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Ml 48166
P. Fessler -2 -If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Ms. Sujata Goetz at 301-415-8004 or via e-mail at Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-341 Enclosure: Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ Sincerely, OJ 9. y --David J. Wrona, Chief Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO RELIEF REQUEST VRR-014 FOR THE THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL OF THE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY FERMI 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341 1.0 INTRODUCTION By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 16077 A216}, DTE Electric Company (DTE}, the licensee, submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010. Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. 2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION The regulations under 1 O CFR 50.55a(f}, "lnservice testing requirements,'' require, in part, that IST of certain ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components must meet the requirements of the ASME OM Code and applicable addenda, except where alternatives have been authorized pursuant to paragraphs 1 O CFR 50.55a(z)(1) or 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2). The regulations under 1 O CFR 50.55a(z}, state, in part, that alternatives to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(f) may be authorized by the NRC if the licensee demonstrates that: (1) the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety, or (2) compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ), relief request VRR-014 stated that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. Enclosure
 
-2 -Based on the above, and subject to the NRC's findings with respect to authorizing the proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code given below, the NRC staff concludes that regulatory authority exists for the licensee to request and the Commission to authorize the alternative requested by the licensee. 3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION 3.1 Licensee's Alternative Request VRR-014 Applicable Code Edition and Addenda The Fermi 2 third 10-year IST interval began on February 17, 2010. The applicable ASME OM Code Edition for the Fermi 2 third 10-year IST program interval is the 2004 Edition, no addenda. Code Requirements ASME OM Code Mandatory Appendix I, paragraph l-1320(a), requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be periodically tested at least once every 5 years, with a minimum of 20 percent of the valves tested within any 24 months, where the 20 percent shall be previously untested valves, if they exist. The required test ensures that the main steam safety relief valves (SRVs), which are located on each of the main steam lines between the reactor vessel and the first isolation valve within the drywell, will open at the pressures assumed in the safety analysis. Reason for Request The licensee requested relief from the OM Code requirements of Mandatory Appendix I for testing the 15 main steam SRVs: B2104F013A B2104F013D B2104F013G B2104F013K B2104F013N B2104F013B B2104F013E B2104F013H B2104F013L B2104F013P B2104F013C B2104F013F B2104F013J B2104F013M B2104F013R Given the current 18-month refuel cycle at Fermi 2, the licensee is required to remove and test five of the SRVs every refueling outage in order to ensure that all valves are removed and tested in accordance with the ASME OM Code 5-year test requirement. With the current 5-year interval, Fermi 2 is required to remove all 15 SRVs over three refuel cycles (approximately 4.5 years). Extending the test interval to 6 years would reduce the number of SRVs removed during an individual outage by one, such that the full scope of 15 SRVs would be tested over four refuel cycles while still complying with the other Code requirement to test 20 percent of the valves within any 24-month period. Additionally, a 6-month grace period would allow flexibility in the scheduling of set-pressure testing to account for the variability of refuel outage dates. Test history for the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 (Target Rock Model 7567F) from April 2000 to present indicates that of the 165 SRVs tested, 151 valves successfully passed the ASME OM
==SUBJECT:==
-3 -Code and Technical Specification as-found lift set-point acceptance criteria within plus or minus 3 percent. Of the 14 that failed, at no time were the ASME overpressure analyses challenged. In addition, within that time frame, there have been no plant shutdowns related to SRV performance. This historical Fermi 2 test data is consistent with the reliable and sustained performance of the Target Rock Model 7567F SRV. Proposed Alternative Since Fermi 2 operates on an 18-month refueling outage cycle, the licensee proposed that the main steam SRVs be tested periodically at least once every 6.5 years (i.e., 6 years with a grace period of 6 months). A minimum of 20 percent of the pressure relief valves will be tested within any 24-month interval and the test interval for any individual valve will not exceed 6.5 years. This alternative is consistent with the alternative provided in ASME Code Case OMN-17, "Alternative Rules for Testing ASME Class I Pressure Relief/Safety Valves." In its letter dated March 16, 2016, the licensee stated, in part, that: DTE has historically removed a full complement of SRV pilots each refueling outage and shipped them to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing. If a full complement is removed, the removed valves would be as-found tested within the Code required 24 month time frame. If a partial [complement] is removed, then the valves would be shipped to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing prior to resumption of electric power generation, and to determine if any expansion testing is required. The vendor also performs the inspection, refurbishment, and as-left testing that meets the maintenance requirements specified in subparagraph (d) of OMN-17. For these reasons, the proposed alternative complies with paragraph (b) of Code Case OMN-17. A DTE approved vendor procedure is used for disassembly and inspection of the SRVs. This procedure requires that each SRV be disassembled and inspected upon removal from service, regardless of the as-found test results. The procedure identifies the critical components that are required to be inspected for wear and defects, and the critical dimensions that are required to be measured during the inspection. If components are found worn or outside of the specified tolerance(s), the components are either reworked to within the specified tolerances, or replaced. DTE is notified by the vendor of all components that are either defective, outside of tolerance, or reworked/replaced. The SRV is then re-assembled, the as-left test is performed, and the SRV is returned to Fermi 2. 3.2 NRC Staff Evaluation The Fermi 2 main steam SRVs are ASME Code Class 1 pressure relief valves that provide overpressure protection for the reactor coolant pressure boundary to prevent unacceptable radioactive release and exposure to plant personnel. ASME OM Code, Mandatory Appendix I requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be tested at least once every 5 years. However, Mandatory Appendix I does not require that pressure relief valves be disassembled and inspected as part of the 5-year test requirement. In lieu of the 5-year test interval, the licensee
FERMI 2 - RELIEF FOR VRR-014 FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ASME OM CODE (CAC NO. MF7 491)
-4 -proposed to implement the requirements of ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, which allows a test interval of 6 years plus a 6-month grace period. The ASME committee on OM developed Code Case OMN-17 and published it in the 2009 Edition of the ASME OM Code. However, ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 imposes an additional special maintenance requirement to disassemble and inspect each pressure relief/safety valve to verify that parts are free from defects resulting from time-related degradation or service-induced wear coincident with each required test during the interval. The purpose of this maintenance requirement is to reduce the potential for pressure relief valve set-point drift. ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 has been added to NRG Regulatory Guide 1.192, "Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM Code," and included in 10 CFR 50.55a rulemaking, although this rulemaking is not finalized at this time. However, the NRG has allowed licensees to use ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, provided all requirements in the Code Case are met. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, each main steam SRV at Fermi 2 will be disassembled and inspected to verify that internal surfaces and parts are free from defects or service induced wear prior to the start of the next test interval. This maintenance will also help to reduce the potential for setpoint drift, and increase the reliability of these SRVs to perform their design requirement functions. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, critical components will be inspected for wear and defects. Additionally, a review of recent setpoint testing results shows that the SRV maintenance practices employed at Fermi 2 have been effective as evidenced by the test history for these SRVs. Based on the historical performance of the set-point testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 and disassembly and inspection of the main steam SRVs prior to use, the NRG staff finds that the proposed alternative test frequency for the testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2, in lieu of the requirements of the 2004 Edition, no Addenda, Mandatory Appendix I, Section 1320 of the ASME OM Code, provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. 4.0 CONCLUSION As set forth above, the NRG staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 1 O CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRG staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010. All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable. Principal Contributor: John Billerbeck Date: January 18, 2017 P. Fessler -2 -If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Ms. Sujata Goetz at 301-415-8004 or via e-mail at Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov. Sincerely, IRA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341 Enclosure: Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC LPL3 Reading RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorllpl3 Resource RidsNrrDeEpnb Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource JBillerbeck, NRR/DE/EPNB JBowen, EDO Riii ADAMS Accession No.: ML 16357A280 *SE via e-mail dated OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NRR/DORL/LPL3/LA NRR/DE/EPNB/BC NAME SGoetz SRohrer (JBurkhardt for)** DAiiey DATE 12/29/16 12/22/16 12/10/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY **via email NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC DWrona 01/18/2017
 
}}
==Dear Mr. Fessler:==
 
By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16077A216), DTE Electric Company (the licensee) submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010.
Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.
As set forth in the enclosed safety evaluation, the NRC staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRC staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010.
All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable.
 
P. Fessler                                   If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Ms. Sujata Goetz at 301-415-8004 or via e-mail at Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, OJ 9. y --
David J. Wrona, Chief Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341
 
==Enclosure:==
 
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
 
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO RELIEF REQUEST VRR-014 FOR THE THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL OF THE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY FERMI 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341
 
==1.0     INTRODUCTION==
 
By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16077A216}, DTE Electric Company (DTE}, the licensee, submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010.
Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.
 
==2.0     REGULATORY EVALUATION==
 
The regulations under 10 CFR 50.55a(f}, "lnservice testing requirements,'' require, in part, that IST of certain ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components must meet the requirements of the ASME OM Code and applicable addenda, except where alternatives have been authorized pursuant to paragraphs 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) or 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2).
The regulations under 10 CFR 50.55a(z}, state, in part, that alternatives to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(f) may be authorized by the NRC if the licensee demonstrates that: (1) the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety, or (2) compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ), relief request VRR-014 stated that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Enclosure
 
Based on the above, and subject to the NRC's findings with respect to authorizing the proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code given below, the NRC staff concludes that regulatory authority exists for the licensee to request and the Commission to authorize the alternative requested by the licensee.
 
==3.0     TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
 
3.1     Licensee's Alternative Request VRR-014
 
===Applicable Code Edition and Addenda===
The Fermi 2 third 10-year IST interval began on February 17, 2010. The applicable ASME OM Code Edition for the Fermi 2 third 10-year IST program interval is the 2004 Edition, no addenda.
Code Requirements ASME OM Code Mandatory Appendix I, paragraph l-1320(a), requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be periodically tested at least once every 5 years, with a minimum of 20 percent of the valves tested within any 24 months, where the 20 percent shall be previously untested valves, if they exist.
The required test ensures that the main steam safety relief valves (SRVs), which are located on each of the main steam lines between the reactor vessel and the first isolation valve within the drywell, will open at the pressures assumed in the safety analysis.
 
===Reason for Request===
The licensee requested relief from the OM Code requirements of Mandatory Appendix I for testing the 15 main steam SRVs:
B2104F013A                       B2104F013B                  B2104F013C B2104F013D                       B2104F013E                  B2104F013F B2104F013G                       B2104F013H                  B2104F013J B2104F013K                       B2104F013L                  B2104F013M B2104F013N                       B2104F013P                   B2104F013R Given the current 18-month refuel cycle at Fermi 2, the licensee is required to remove and test five of the SRVs every refueling outage in order to ensure that all valves are removed and tested in accordance with the ASME OM Code 5-year test requirement. With the current 5-year interval, Fermi 2 is required to remove all 15 SRVs over three refuel cycles (approximately 4.5 years). Extending the test interval to 6 years would reduce the number of SRVs removed during an individual outage by one, such that the full scope of 15 SRVs would be tested over four refuel cycles while still complying with the other Code requirement to test 20 percent of the valves within any 24-month period. Additionally, a 6-month grace period would allow flexibility in the scheduling of set-pressure testing to account for the variability of refuel outage dates.
Test history for the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 (Target Rock Model 7567F) from April 2000 to present indicates that of the 165 SRVs tested, 151 valves successfully passed the ASME OM
 
Code and Technical Specification as-found lift set-point acceptance criteria within plus or minus 3 percent. Of the 14 that failed, at no time were the ASME overpressure analyses challenged.
In addition, within that time frame, there have been no plant shutdowns related to SRV performance. This historical Fermi 2 test data is consistent with the reliable and sustained performance of the Target Rock Model 7567F SRV.
Proposed Alternative Since Fermi 2 operates on an 18-month refueling outage cycle, the licensee proposed that the main steam SRVs be tested periodically at least once every 6.5 years (i.e., 6 years with a grace period of 6 months). A minimum of 20 percent of the pressure relief valves will be tested within any 24-month interval and the test interval for any individual valve will not exceed 6.5 years.
This alternative is consistent with the alternative provided in ASME Code Case OMN-17, "Alternative Rules for Testing ASME Class I Pressure Relief/Safety Valves."
In its letter dated March 16, 2016, the licensee stated, in part, that:
DTE has historically removed a full complement of SRV pilots each refueling outage and shipped them to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing. If a full complement is removed, the removed valves would be as-found tested within the Code required 24 month time frame. If a partial
[complement] is removed, then the valves would be shipped to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing prior to resumption of electric power generation, and to determine if any expansion testing is required. The vendor also performs the inspection, refurbishment, and as-left testing that meets the maintenance requirements specified in subparagraph (d) of OMN-17. For these reasons, the proposed alternative complies with paragraph (b) of Code Case OMN-17.
A DTE approved vendor procedure is used for disassembly and inspection of the SRVs. This procedure requires that each SRV be disassembled and inspected upon removal from service, regardless of the as-found test results. The procedure identifies the critical components that are required to be inspected for wear and defects, and the critical dimensions that are required to be measured during the inspection. If components are found worn or outside of the specified tolerance(s), the components are either reworked to within the specified tolerances, or replaced. DTE is notified by the vendor of all components that are either defective, outside of tolerance, or reworked/replaced. The SRV is then re-assembled, the as-left test is performed, and the SRV is returned to Fermi 2.
3.2     NRC Staff Evaluation The Fermi 2 main steam SRVs are ASME Code Class 1 pressure relief valves that provide overpressure protection for the reactor coolant pressure boundary to prevent unacceptable radioactive release and exposure to plant personnel. ASME OM Code, Mandatory Appendix I requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be tested at least once every 5 years. However, Mandatory Appendix I does not require that pressure relief valves be disassembled and inspected as part of the 5-year test requirement. In lieu of the 5-year test interval, the licensee
 
proposed to implement the requirements of ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, which allows a test interval of 6 years plus a 6-month grace period. The ASME committee on OM developed Code Case OMN-17 and published it in the 2009 Edition of the ASME OM Code. However, ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 imposes an additional special maintenance requirement to disassemble and inspect each pressure relief/safety valve to verify that parts are free from defects resulting from time-related degradation or service-induced wear coincident with each required test during the interval. The purpose of this maintenance requirement is to reduce the potential for pressure relief valve set-point drift.
ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 has been added to NRG Regulatory Guide 1.192, "Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM Code," and included in 10 CFR 50.55a rulemaking, although this rulemaking is not finalized at this time. However, the NRG has allowed licensees to use ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, provided all requirements in the Code Case are met. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, each main steam SRV at Fermi 2 will be disassembled and inspected to verify that internal surfaces and parts are free from defects or service induced wear prior to the start of the next test interval. This maintenance will also help to reduce the potential for setpoint drift, and increase the reliability of these SRVs to perform their design requirement functions. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, critical components will be inspected for wear and defects.
Additionally, a review of recent setpoint testing results shows that the SRV maintenance practices employed at Fermi 2 have been effective as evidenced by the test history for these SRVs.
Based on the historical performance of the set-point testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 and disassembly and inspection of the main steam SRVs prior to use, the NRG staff finds that the proposed alternative test frequency for the testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2, in lieu of the requirements of the 2004 Edition, no Addenda, Mandatory Appendix I, Section 1320 of the ASME OM Code, provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.
 
==4.0     CONCLUSION==
 
As set forth above, the NRG staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRG staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010.
All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable.
Principal Contributor: John Billerbeck Date: January 18, 2017
 
ML16357A280              *SE via e-mail dated        **via email OFFICE  NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM      NRR/DORL/LPL3/LA          NRR/DE/EPNB/BC      NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC NAME    SGoetz                SRohrer (JBurkhardt for)** DAiiey              DWrona DATE     12/29/16             12/22/16                   12/10/16             01/18/2017}}

Latest revision as of 14:12, 10 November 2019

Relief from the Requirements of the ASME Code
ML16357A280
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/2017
From: David Wrona
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Fessler P
DTE Electric Company
Goetz S, NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1, 415-8004
References
CAC MF7491
Download: ML16357A280 (7)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Janurary 18, 2017 Mr. Paul Fessler Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Ml 48166

SUBJECT:

FERMI 2 - RELIEF FOR VRR-014 FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ASME OM CODE (CAC NO. MF7 491)

Dear Mr. Fessler:

By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16077A216), DTE Electric Company (the licensee) submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010.

Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

As set forth in the enclosed safety evaluation, the NRC staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRC staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010.

All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable.

P. Fessler If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Ms. Sujata Goetz at 301-415-8004 or via e-mail at Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, OJ 9. y --

David J. Wrona, Chief Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO RELIEF REQUEST VRR-014 FOR THE THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL OF THE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY FERMI 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16077A216}, DTE Electric Company (DTE}, the licensee, submitted request for relief VRR-014 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), proposing an alternative to certain requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code), for the inservice testing (IST) program at Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which started on February 17, 2010.

Specifically, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, paragraph 50.55a(z)(1 ), the licensee requested to use the proposed alternative in VRR-014 on the basis that the alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The regulations under 10 CFR 50.55a(f}, "lnservice testing requirements, require, in part, that IST of certain ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components must meet the requirements of the ASME OM Code and applicable addenda, except where alternatives have been authorized pursuant to paragraphs 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) or 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2).

The regulations under 10 CFR 50.55a(z}, state, in part, that alternatives to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(f) may be authorized by the NRC if the licensee demonstrates that: (1) the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety, or (2) compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ), relief request VRR-014 stated that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Enclosure

Based on the above, and subject to the NRC's findings with respect to authorizing the proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code given below, the NRC staff concludes that regulatory authority exists for the licensee to request and the Commission to authorize the alternative requested by the licensee.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3.1 Licensee's Alternative Request VRR-014

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

The Fermi 2 third 10-year IST interval began on February 17, 2010. The applicable ASME OM Code Edition for the Fermi 2 third 10-year IST program interval is the 2004 Edition, no addenda.

Code Requirements ASME OM Code Mandatory Appendix I, paragraph l-1320(a), requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be periodically tested at least once every 5 years, with a minimum of 20 percent of the valves tested within any 24 months, where the 20 percent shall be previously untested valves, if they exist.

The required test ensures that the main steam safety relief valves (SRVs), which are located on each of the main steam lines between the reactor vessel and the first isolation valve within the drywell, will open at the pressures assumed in the safety analysis.

Reason for Request

The licensee requested relief from the OM Code requirements of Mandatory Appendix I for testing the 15 main steam SRVs:

B2104F013A B2104F013B B2104F013C B2104F013D B2104F013E B2104F013F B2104F013G B2104F013H B2104F013J B2104F013K B2104F013L B2104F013M B2104F013N B2104F013P B2104F013R Given the current 18-month refuel cycle at Fermi 2, the licensee is required to remove and test five of the SRVs every refueling outage in order to ensure that all valves are removed and tested in accordance with the ASME OM Code 5-year test requirement. With the current 5-year interval, Fermi 2 is required to remove all 15 SRVs over three refuel cycles (approximately 4.5 years). Extending the test interval to 6 years would reduce the number of SRVs removed during an individual outage by one, such that the full scope of 15 SRVs would be tested over four refuel cycles while still complying with the other Code requirement to test 20 percent of the valves within any 24-month period. Additionally, a 6-month grace period would allow flexibility in the scheduling of set-pressure testing to account for the variability of refuel outage dates.

Test history for the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 (Target Rock Model 7567F) from April 2000 to present indicates that of the 165 SRVs tested, 151 valves successfully passed the ASME OM

Code and Technical Specification as-found lift set-point acceptance criteria within plus or minus 3 percent. Of the 14 that failed, at no time were the ASME overpressure analyses challenged.

In addition, within that time frame, there have been no plant shutdowns related to SRV performance. This historical Fermi 2 test data is consistent with the reliable and sustained performance of the Target Rock Model 7567F SRV.

Proposed Alternative Since Fermi 2 operates on an 18-month refueling outage cycle, the licensee proposed that the main steam SRVs be tested periodically at least once every 6.5 years (i.e., 6 years with a grace period of 6 months). A minimum of 20 percent of the pressure relief valves will be tested within any 24-month interval and the test interval for any individual valve will not exceed 6.5 years.

This alternative is consistent with the alternative provided in ASME Code Case OMN-17, "Alternative Rules for Testing ASME Class I Pressure Relief/Safety Valves."

In its letter dated March 16, 2016, the licensee stated, in part, that:

DTE has historically removed a full complement of SRV pilots each refueling outage and shipped them to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing. If a full complement is removed, the removed valves would be as-found tested within the Code required 24 month time frame. If a partial

[complement] is removed, then the valves would be shipped to an ASME OM Code-certified vendor to perform as-found testing prior to resumption of electric power generation, and to determine if any expansion testing is required. The vendor also performs the inspection, refurbishment, and as-left testing that meets the maintenance requirements specified in subparagraph (d) of OMN-17. For these reasons, the proposed alternative complies with paragraph (b) of Code Case OMN-17.

A DTE approved vendor procedure is used for disassembly and inspection of the SRVs. This procedure requires that each SRV be disassembled and inspected upon removal from service, regardless of the as-found test results. The procedure identifies the critical components that are required to be inspected for wear and defects, and the critical dimensions that are required to be measured during the inspection. If components are found worn or outside of the specified tolerance(s), the components are either reworked to within the specified tolerances, or replaced. DTE is notified by the vendor of all components that are either defective, outside of tolerance, or reworked/replaced. The SRV is then re-assembled, the as-left test is performed, and the SRV is returned to Fermi 2.

3.2 NRC Staff Evaluation The Fermi 2 main steam SRVs are ASME Code Class 1 pressure relief valves that provide overpressure protection for the reactor coolant pressure boundary to prevent unacceptable radioactive release and exposure to plant personnel. ASME OM Code, Mandatory Appendix I requires that Class 1 pressure relief valves be tested at least once every 5 years. However, Mandatory Appendix I does not require that pressure relief valves be disassembled and inspected as part of the 5-year test requirement. In lieu of the 5-year test interval, the licensee

proposed to implement the requirements of ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, which allows a test interval of 6 years plus a 6-month grace period. The ASME committee on OM developed Code Case OMN-17 and published it in the 2009 Edition of the ASME OM Code. However, ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 imposes an additional special maintenance requirement to disassemble and inspect each pressure relief/safety valve to verify that parts are free from defects resulting from time-related degradation or service-induced wear coincident with each required test during the interval. The purpose of this maintenance requirement is to reduce the potential for pressure relief valve set-point drift.

ASME OM Code Case OMN-17 has been added to NRG Regulatory Guide 1.192, "Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM Code," and included in 10 CFR 50.55a rulemaking, although this rulemaking is not finalized at this time. However, the NRG has allowed licensees to use ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, provided all requirements in the Code Case are met. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, each main steam SRV at Fermi 2 will be disassembled and inspected to verify that internal surfaces and parts are free from defects or service induced wear prior to the start of the next test interval. This maintenance will also help to reduce the potential for setpoint drift, and increase the reliability of these SRVs to perform their design requirement functions. Consistent with the special maintenance requirement in ASME OM Code Case OMN-17, critical components will be inspected for wear and defects.

Additionally, a review of recent setpoint testing results shows that the SRV maintenance practices employed at Fermi 2 have been effective as evidenced by the test history for these SRVs.

Based on the historical performance of the set-point testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2 and disassembly and inspection of the main steam SRVs prior to use, the NRG staff finds that the proposed alternative test frequency for the testing of the main steam SRVs at Fermi 2, in lieu of the requirements of the 2004 Edition, no Addenda, Mandatory Appendix I, Section 1320 of the ASME OM Code, provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

4.0 CONCLUSION

As set forth above, the NRG staff determines that for alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety. Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) for request VRR-014 for Fermi 2. Therefore, the NRG staff authorizes alternative request VRR-014 for Fermi 2 for the remainder of the third 10-year IST program interval, which began on February 17, 2010.

All other ASME OM Code requirements for which relief was not specifically requested and approved in the subject request remain applicable.

Principal Contributor: John Billerbeck Date: January 18, 2017

ML16357A280 *SE via e-mail dated **via email OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NRR/DORL/LPL3/LA NRR/DE/EPNB/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC NAME SGoetz SRohrer (JBurkhardt for)** DAiiey DWrona DATE 12/29/16 12/22/16 12/10/16 01/18/2017