Information Notice 1998-07, Offsite Power Reliability Challenges from Industry Deregulation: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/27/1998
| issue date = 02/27/1998
| title = Offsite Power Reliability Challenges from Industry Deregulation
| title = Offsite Power Reliability Challenges from Industry Deregulation
| author name = Roe J W
| author name = Roe J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:X 71 C sa' February 27, 1998NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 98-07: OFFSITE POWER RELIABILITY CHALLENGES FROMINDUSTRY DEREGULATION
{{#Wiki_filter:X 71 C sa'
                                            UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 27, 1998 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 98-07: OFFSITE POWER RELIABILITY CHALLENGES FROM
 
INDUSTRY DEREGULATION


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have ceasedoperations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the vessel.
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the vessel.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to a potential concern relating to electric power industry deregulation that couldadversely affect the reliability of offsite power sources, i.e., power from the transmission systemgrid to nuclear power plants. It is expected that recipients will review the information forapplicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate. However, suggestionscontained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action orwritten response to this notice is required.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to a potential concern relating to electric power industry deregulation that could
 
adversely affect the reliability of offsite power sources, i.e., power from the transmission system
 
grid to nuclear power plants. It is expected that recipients will review the information for
 
applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate. However, suggestions
 
contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or
 
written response to this notice is required.


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
On July 11, 1989, safety systems at Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station experienced a sustaineddegraded voltage condition and as a result the safety buses were automatically transferred fromthe offsite power system to onsite standby diesel generators. The degraded condition wascaused by a turbine trip and deficiencies in the offsite power system's transmission networkequipment. The transfer of power supplies was initiated by operation of degraded voltageprotective relays, as designed. Non-safety system loads remained operable while being poweredfor approximately 1 hour from the degraded offsite power source. (LER 50-395/89-012)On November 5, 1991, the licensee for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 reported that, hadits 500kV auto-transformer been lost during summer peak conditions, the 161kV system mightnot have been able to maintain adequate voltages to support the operation of the safety systemloads of both units. (LER 50-313/91-010)On April 15, 1992, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain operatingconditions of the transmission network (i.e., during heavy load conditions), a failure oftransmission system equipment may cause a trip of all three Millstone units and a loss of offsitepower to the station. This operating condition was precipitated by the economic displacementof oil-fired generating units by non-utility generators and by the addition of other generatingcapacity (Seabrook and Hydro-Quebec) to the transmission network. (LER 50-245/92-020)?PD 1re-F Normf, 1g-0o7 80a.2 7q ~ r 1l~lill~lill~lill~lililuill1!\i IN -07February 27, 1998 On April 14, 1993, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation reported that under certain transmissionline contingencies, a potential existed for the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant grid to becomeunstable and cause all offsite power sources into the plant to trip. (Ref: LER 50-305/93-010)On December 30, 1993, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certainoperating conditions of the transmission network (i.e., Millstone Units 2 and 3 off line), thetransmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continued operation of safetysystem loads from offsite sources following a trip of Millstone Unit 1. (LER 50-245/94-001)On August 8, 1995, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) reported that under certainoperating conditions (i.e., a high system load with a specific 230kV transmission line out ofservice), the transmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continuedoperation of the safety system loads from offsite sources following a trip of one of the two DiabloCanyon units. (Ref: LER 50-275/95-007)On August 10, 1996, a transmission line sagged into a tree in Oregon creating a ground fault thatprogressed into a major fault on the western Interconnection. The subsequent transient resultedin the tripping of both Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 (LER 50-275/96-012) and Palo Verde, Units 1and 3 (LER 50-528/004).During the summer of 1997, concerns were expressed about the impact of electric peakconditions on the offsite power sources for nuclear power plants located in the Midwest andNew England. In addition, the licensee for Clinton nuclear station sought an exemption fromoffsite power regulatory requirements because of its analysis that offsite power would becomeinadequate under certain summer peak conditions following the loss of the nuclear unit.Recent NRC inspection findings and Licensee Event Reports have indicated instances when gridstability analyses had not been updated by the licensees to reflect changes in the grid powersystem. Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data study C97-01, "Grid PerformanceFactors" dated March 20, 1997, identified a Oneed to monitor grid conditions on a regular basis."DiscussionIn 1988, NRC issued the station blackout (SBO) rule. The requirements of 10 CFR 50.63, "Lossof All Alternating Current Power," specify that each light-water-cooled nuclear power plant beable to withstand and recover from an SBO (i.e., a loss of offsite and onsite emergency ac powersources) for a specified period. The NRC review of licensees' analyses to assess thevulnerability of offsite power and the time required for recovery indicated that for most nuclearpower plant sites the grid was stable and reliable.Historically, grid control is decentralized and each utility or a small group of utilities forms acontrol area containing customers for which it Is jurisdictionally responsible. The control areasform reliability councils that establish operating standards by consensus. These agreements, inturn, became the factors that determine the reliability of the grid and the bases for the availabilityof the offsite power system. Although the grid operating standards that evolved in the pastprovided reasonable grid reliability, events like those discussed herein reveal vulnerabilities ofthe electrical grid either through actual challenges or through licensee's analyses to assess theadequacy of the offsite power syste INS '7Feb,--dry 27, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that areemerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, powersuppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales tocustomers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiplecombinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performancerelated consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralizedindependent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to bedefined, but It is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining gridreliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms forreliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department ofEnergy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications ofindustry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could besignificantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since thecapability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, thedesign bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis thataccounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operabilityof safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance forassessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses thatdemonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss ofnuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses inlicensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases withrespect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life ofthe nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear powerplants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting fromindustry deregulation.This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questionsabout the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below orthe appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.orig /s/'d byJack W. Roe, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR301415-2985 301415-1 176E-Mail: rvj2nrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.govA-1T E~A FiL ;1 JAckETF
On July 11, 1989, safety systems at Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station experienced a sustained
 
degraded voltage condition and as a result the safety buses were automatically transferred from
 
the offsite power system to onsite standby diesel generators. The degraded condition was
 
caused by a turbine trip and deficiencies in the offsite power system's transmission network
 
equipment. The transfer of power supplies was initiated by operation of degraded voltage
 
protective relays, as designed. Non-safety system loads remained operable while being powered
 
for approximately 1 hour from the degraded offsite power source. (LER 50-395/89-012)
On November 5, 1991, the licensee for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 reported that, had
 
its 500kV auto-transformer been lost during summer peak conditions, the 161kV system might
 
not have been able to maintain adequate voltages to support the operation of the safety system
 
loads of both units. (LER 50-313/91-010)
On April 15, 1992, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain operating
 
conditions of the transmission network (i.e., during heavy load conditions), a failure of
 
transmission system equipment may cause a trip of all three Millstone units and a loss of offsite
 
power to the station. This operating condition was precipitated by the economic displacement
 
of oil-fired generating units by non-utility generators and by the addition of other generating
 
capacity (Seabrook and Hydro-Quebec) to the transmission network. (LER 50-245/92-020)
                  ?PD 1re-F Normf, 1g-0o7 80a.2 7 q~ r                                       1l~lill~lill~lill~lililuill1!\i
 
IN -07 February 27, 1998 On April 14, 1993, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation reported that under certain transmission
 
line contingencies, a potential existed for the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant grid to become
 
unstable and cause all offsite power sources into the plant to trip. (Ref: LER 50-305/93-010)
On December 30, 1993, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain
 
operating conditions of the transmission network (i.e., Millstone Units 2 and 3 off line), the
 
transmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continued operation of safety
 
system loads from offsite sources following a trip of Millstone Unit 1. (LER 50-245/94-001)
On August 8, 1995, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) reported that under certain
 
operating conditions (i.e., a high system load with a specific 230kV transmission line out of
 
service), the transmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continued
 
operation of the safety system loads from offsite sources following a trip of one of the two Diablo
 
Canyon units. (Ref: LER 50-275/95-007)
On August 10, 1996, a transmission line sagged into a tree in Oregon creating a ground fault that
 
progressed into a major fault on the western Interconnection. The subsequent transient resulted
 
in the tripping of both Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 (LER 50-275/96-012) and Palo Verde, Units 1 and 3 (LER 50-528/004).
 
During the summer of 1997, concerns were expressed about the impact of electric peak
 
conditions on the offsite power sources for nuclear power plants located in the Midwest and
 
New England. In addition, the licensee for Clinton nuclear station sought an exemption from
 
offsite power regulatory requirements because of its analysis that offsite power would become
 
inadequate under certain summer peak conditions following the loss of the nuclear unit.
 
Recent NRC inspection findings and Licensee Event Reports have indicated instances when grid
 
stability analyses had not been updated by the licensees to reflect changes in the grid power
 
system. Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data study C97-01, "Grid Performance
 
Factors" dated March 20, 1997, identified a Oneed to monitor grid conditions on a regular basis."
Discussion
 
In 1988, NRC issued the station blackout (SBO) rule. The requirements of 10 CFR 50.63, "Loss
 
of All Alternating Current Power," specify that each light-water-cooled nuclear power plant be
 
able to withstand and recover from an SBO (i.e., a loss of offsite and onsite emergency ac power
 
sources) for a specified period. The NRC review of licensees' analyses to assess the
 
vulnerability of offsite power and the time required for recovery indicated that for most nuclear
 
power plant sites the grid was stable and reliable.
 
Historically, grid control is decentralized and each utility or a small group of utilities forms a
 
control area containing customers for which it Is jurisdictionally responsible. The control areas
 
form reliability councils that establish operating standards by consensus. These agreements, in
 
turn, became the factors that determine the reliability of the grid and the bases for the availability
 
of the offsite power system. Although the grid operating standards that evolved in the past
 
provided reasonable grid reliability, events like those discussed herein reveal vulnerabilities of
 
the electrical grid either through actual challenges or through licensee's analyses to assess the
 
adequacy of the offsite power system.
 
INS '7 Feb,--dry 27, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are
 
emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, power
 
suppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales to
 
customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple
 
combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance
 
related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized
 
independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be
 
defined, but It is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid
 
reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for
 
reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of
 
Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of
 
industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.
 
The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be
 
significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the
 
capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the
 
design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that
 
accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability
 
of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for
 
assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that
 
demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss of
 
nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.
 
Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses in
 
licensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with
 
respect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of
 
the nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power
 
plants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from
 
industry deregulation.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions
 
about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or
 
the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
orig /s/'d by
 
Jack W. Roe, Acting Director
 
Division of Reactor Program Management
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR                     Thomas Koshy, NRR
 
301415-2985                         301415-1 176 E-Mail: rvj2nrc.gov                 E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov
 
A-1T             E~A   FiL             ;1 JAckETF
 
Attachment: Ust of recently issued Information Notices
 
OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 214198, PGEB Id 2/17198 (T. Essig),
  AEOD    Idc  2/12/98 (E.Rossi) & Tech Editor 1/27/98 DOCUMENT NAME: S:%DRPM SEC\98-07.IN - SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
 
To receive a copy of Nhis document, Indicate Inthe box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmenUendosure N =No copy l
 
OFFICE          PECB I            EELB      I      IEELB I            PECB              PECB          LI    DRPM A
 
NAME            TKoshy*          RJenkins*          JCalvo*          RDennig*          SRichards*          JRoe*
  DATE            2/2/98        j 2/2/98            j 2/2/98            2/10/98            2/11/98            2/17/98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
Attachment
 
IN 98-07 February 27, 1998 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
 
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
 
Information                                          Date of
 
Notice No.            Subject                        Issuance  Issued to
 
98-06            Unauthorized Use of Ucense to      2/19198    All NRC licensees authorized to
 
Obtain Radioactive Materials,                    possess licensed material
 
And Its Implications Under The
 
Expanded Title 18 of the
 
U.S. Code
 
97-45, Supp. 1  Environmental Qualification        2/17/98    All holders of operating
 
Deficiency for Cables and                      licenses for nuclear power
 
Containment Penetration                        reactors except those licensees
 
Pigtails                                      who have permanently ceased
 
operations and have certified that
 
the fuel has been permanently
 
removed from the reactor vessel
 
98-05            Criminal History Record            2111/98    All holders of operating
 
Information                                    licenses for power reactors
 
98-04            1997 Enforcement Sanctions for    2/9/98    All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
 
deliberate Violations of NRC                  Commission licensees
 
Employee Protection requirements
 
98-03            Inadequate Verification of          1/21/98  All holders of operating licenses
 
Overcurrent Trip Setpoints in                  for nuclear power reactors
 
Metal-Clad, Low-Voltage
 
Circuit Breakers
 
98-02            Nuclear Power Plant Cold            1/21/98  All holders of operating licenses
 
Weather Problems and                          for nuclear power reactors
 
Protective Measures
 
98-01            Thefts of Portable Gauges            1/15/98  All portable gauge licensees
 
97-91            Recent Failures of Control          12/31/97  All industrial radiography
 
Cables Used on Amersham                        licensees
 
Model 660 Posilock Radiography
 
Systems
 
97-90            Use of Nonconservative              12/30/97  All holders of OLs for nuclear
 
Acceptance Criteria in                        power reactors except those
 
Safety-Related Pump                            who have ceased operations
 
Surveillance Tests                            and have certified that fuel has
 
been permanently removed from
 
the vessel
 
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit
 
IN9' Y
 
,                                          Feb~Uyxx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are
 
emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, power
 
suppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales to
 
customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple
 
combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance
 
related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized
 
independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be
 
defined, but it Is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid
 
reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for
 
reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of
 
Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of
 
industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.
 
The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be
 
significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the
 
capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the
 
design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that
 
accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability
 
of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for
 
assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that
 
demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios Involving loss of
 
nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.
 
Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses in
 
licensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with
 
respect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of
 
the nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power
 
plants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from
 
industry deregulation.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions
 
about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or
 
the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
Jack W. Roe, Acting Director
 
Division of Reactor Program Management
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR                    Thomas Koshy, NRR
 
301-415-2985                        301-415-1176 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov                  E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices
 
OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4198 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD - 'SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
 
To receive a copy of this document indicate Inthe box C=Copy wlo aftachmentlenclosure E    d:        .ATo  osure N = No copy
 
[OFFICE        lPECB          lI  EELB        1 _ EELB        l      PECB      lI      PECB          I  DRPM
 
NAME            TKoshy*        RJenkins*          JCalvo*          RDennig*      lSRichards'Jle
 
l DATE          j  2/2/98
                      _J___A_
                                  [2/2/98            .
 
2/2/98          j 2/10/98        l-;1      /98
                                                                                                  18-
                                                                                                                  1/98
                                                                                                                    1/ 8--
                                                        OFFICIAL RECORD COPY t                CM            I
 
Tre
 
ING' x
 
Febkty xx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are
 
emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It is anticipated that in the future, power
 
suppliers, whether utilities or Independent power producers, will a6tively compete for sales to
 
customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple
 
combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance
 
related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized
 
independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be
 
defined, but it is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid
 
reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for
 
reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of
 
Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of
 
industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.
 
The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be
 
significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the
 
capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the
 
design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that
 
accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability
 
of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for
 
assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that
 
demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss of
 
nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.
 
Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weakness in
 
licensees' process, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with respect
 
to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of the
 
nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power plants
 
are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from
 
industry deregulation.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions
 
about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or
 
the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
Jack W. Roe, Acting Director
 
Division of Reactor Program Management
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR                    Thomas Koshy, NRR
 
301-415-2985                        301-415-1176 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov                E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices
 
OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4/98 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD - SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
 
To receive a copy of this document, idicate hithe box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy
 
lOFFICE          PECB      I      EELB          _L EELB        I -                      PECB                l- DRPM_
  NAME            TKoshyl          RJenkins*        JCalvo*              gnig ~        SRichards                JRoe
 
l DATE          I  /==            2/2/9f          12/219°B9%
                                                            i          ,I                l            I          / I9t
 
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
IN "x
 
February xx, 1998 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
 
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed
 
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
Jack W. Roe, Acting Director
 
Division of Reactor Program Management
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR
 
301-415-2985 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov
 
Thomas Koshy, NRR
 
301-415-1176 E-Mail: txkenrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices
 
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\TXKAGRIDIN2.1WPD
 
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo atachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy


===Attachment:===
OFFICE      l PECB           lEELB                  EELB       El I PECB          I PECB           l    lDRPMl
Ust of recently issued Information NoticesOGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 214198, PGEB Id 2/17198 (T. Essig),AEOD Idc 2/12/98 (E.Rossi) & Tech Editor 1/27/98DOCUMENT NAME: S:%DRPM SEC\98-07.IN -SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCETo receive a copy of Nhis document, Indicate In the box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmenUendosure N = No copylOFFICE PECB I EELB I IEELB I PECB L PECB I DRPM ANAME TKoshy* RJenkins* JCalvo* RDennig* SRichards* JRoe*DATE 2/2/98 j 2/2/98 j 2/2/98 2/10/98 2/11/98 2/17/98OFFICIAL RECORD COPY AttachmentIN 98-07February 27, 1998 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to98-06 Unauthorized Use of Ucense to 2/19198 All NRC licensees authorized toObtain Radioactive Materials,And Its Implications Under TheExpanded Title 18 of theU.S. CodeEnvironmental QualificationDeficiency for Cables andContainment PenetrationPigtailspossess licensed material97-45, Supp. 12/17/98All holders of operatinglicenses for nuclear powerreactors except those licenseeswho have permanently ceasedoperations and have certified thatthe fuel has been permanentlyremoved from the reactor vessel98-0598-0498-0398-0298-0197-9197-90Criminal History RecordInformation1997 Enforcement Sanctions fordeliberate Violations of NRCEmployee Protection requirementsInadequate Verification ofOvercurrent Trip Setpoints inMetal-Clad, Low-VoltageCircuit BreakersNuclear Power Plant ColdWeather Problems andProtective MeasuresThefts of Portable GaugesRecent Failures of ControlCables Used on AmershamModel 660 Posilock RadiographySystemsUse of NonconservativeAcceptance Criteria inSafety-Related PumpSurveillance Tests2111/982/9/981/21/981/21/981/15/9812/31/9712/30/97All holders of operatinglicenses for power reactorsAll U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission licenseesAll holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactorsAll holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactorsAll portable gauge licenseesAll industrial radiographylicenseesAll holders of OLs for nuclearpower reactors except thosewho have ceased operationsand have certified that fuel hasbeen permanently removed fromthe vesselOL = Operating LicenseCP = Construction Permit IN9' Y, Feb~Uyxx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that areemerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, powersuppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales tocustomers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiplecombinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performancerelated consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralizedindependent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to bedefined, but it Is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining gridreliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms forreliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department ofEnergy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications ofindustry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could besignificantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since thecapability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, thedesign bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis thataccounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operabilityof safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance forassessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses thatdemonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios Involving loss ofnuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses inlicensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases withrespect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life ofthe nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear powerplants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting fromindustry deregulation.This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questionsabout the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below orthe appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack W. Roe, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR301-415-2985 301-415-1176E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov


===Attachment:===
NAME                 s        RJenkins             JCalvo /1       RDennig          SRichards            JRoe
List of recently issued Information NoticesOGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4198DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD -'SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCETo receive a copy of this document indicate In the box C=Copy wlo aftachmentlenclosure E d: .ATo osure N = No copy[OFFICE lPECB lI EELB 1 _ EELB l PECB lI PECB I DRPMNAME TKoshy* RJenkins* JCalvo* RDennig* lSRichards'Jlel DATE j 2/2/98 [2/2/98 2/2/98 j 2/10/98 l- ;1 /98 1/ 1/98_J___A_ 18- .8--OFFICIAL RECORD COPY t CM ITre ING' xFebkty xx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that areemerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It is anticipated that in the future, powersuppliers, whether utilities or Independent power producers, will a6tively compete for sales tocustomers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiplecombinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performancerelated consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralizedindependent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to bedefined, but it is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining gridreliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms forreliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department ofEnergy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications ofindustry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could besignificantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since thecapability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, thedesign bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis thataccounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operabilityof safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance forassessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses thatdemonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss ofnuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weakness inlicensees' process, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with respectto the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of thenuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power plantsare important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting fromindustry deregulation.This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questionsabout the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below orthe appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack W. Roe, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR301-415-2985 301-415-1176E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov


===Attachment:===
l DATE         121249          I L,-,9l              212/t9        I /           ,     II,9          ,     /    W
List of recently issued Information NoticesOGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4/98DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD -SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCETo receive a copy of this document, idicate hi the box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copylOFFICE PECB I EELB _L EELB I -PECB l- DRPM_NAME TKoshyl RJenkins* JCalvo* g ~ nig SRichards JRoel DATE I /== 2/2/9f 1 2/219 i ,I °B9% l I / I9tOFFICIAL RECORD COPY IN "xFebruary xx, 1998 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack W. Roe, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR301-415-2985E-Mail: rvjenrc.govThomas Koshy, NRR301-415-1176E-Mail: txkenrc.gov


===Attachment:===
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
List of recently issued Information NoticesDOCUMENT NAME: G:\TXKAGRIDIN2.1WPDTo receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo atachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copyOFFICE l PECB lEELB EELB I El PECB I PECB l lDRPMlNAME s RJenkins JCalvo /1 RDennig SRichards JRoel DATE 121249 I L,-,9l 212/t9 I / , I I,9 , / WOFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 04:43, 24 November 2019

Offsite Power Reliability Challenges from Industry Deregulation
ML031050278
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/1998
From: Roe J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
IN-98-007, NUDOCS 9802240067
Download: ML031050278 (7)


X 71 C sa'

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 27, 1998 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 98-07: OFFSITE POWER RELIABILITY CHALLENGES FROM

INDUSTRY DEREGULATION

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have ceased

operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the vessel.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to a potential concern relating to electric power industry deregulation that could

adversely affect the reliability of offsite power sources, i.e., power from the transmission system

grid to nuclear power plants. It is expected that recipients will review the information for

applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate. However, suggestions

contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or

written response to this notice is required.

Description of Circumstances

On July 11, 1989, safety systems at Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station experienced a sustained

degraded voltage condition and as a result the safety buses were automatically transferred from

the offsite power system to onsite standby diesel generators. The degraded condition was

caused by a turbine trip and deficiencies in the offsite power system's transmission network

equipment. The transfer of power supplies was initiated by operation of degraded voltage

protective relays, as designed. Non-safety system loads remained operable while being powered

for approximately 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> from the degraded offsite power source. (LER 50-395/89-012)

On November 5, 1991, the licensee for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 reported that, had

its 500kV auto-transformer been lost during summer peak conditions, the 161kV system might

not have been able to maintain adequate voltages to support the operation of the safety system

loads of both units. (LER 50-313/91-010)

On April 15, 1992, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain operating

conditions of the transmission network (i.e., during heavy load conditions), a failure of

transmission system equipment may cause a trip of all three Millstone units and a loss of offsite

power to the station. This operating condition was precipitated by the economic displacement

of oil-fired generating units by non-utility generators and by the addition of other generating

capacity (Seabrook and Hydro-Quebec) to the transmission network. (LER 50-245/92-020)

?PD 1re-F Normf, 1g-0o7 80a.2 7 q~ r 1l~lill~lill~lill~lililuill1!\i

IN -07 February 27, 1998 On April 14, 1993, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation reported that under certain transmission

line contingencies, a potential existed for the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant grid to become

unstable and cause all offsite power sources into the plant to trip. (Ref: LER 50-305/93-010)

On December 30, 1993, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain

operating conditions of the transmission network (i.e., Millstone Units 2 and 3 off line), the

transmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continued operation of safety

system loads from offsite sources following a trip of Millstone Unit 1. (LER 50-245/94-001)

On August 8, 1995, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) reported that under certain

operating conditions (i.e., a high system load with a specific 230kV transmission line out of

service), the transmission network may not have sufficient capacity to permit the continued

operation of the safety system loads from offsite sources following a trip of one of the two Diablo

Canyon units. (Ref: LER 50-275/95-007)

On August 10, 1996, a transmission line sagged into a tree in Oregon creating a ground fault that

progressed into a major fault on the western Interconnection. The subsequent transient resulted

in the tripping of both Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 (LER 50-275/96-012) and Palo Verde, Units 1 and 3 (LER 50-528/004).

During the summer of 1997, concerns were expressed about the impact of electric peak

conditions on the offsite power sources for nuclear power plants located in the Midwest and

New England. In addition, the licensee for Clinton nuclear station sought an exemption from

offsite power regulatory requirements because of its analysis that offsite power would become

inadequate under certain summer peak conditions following the loss of the nuclear unit.

Recent NRC inspection findings and Licensee Event Reports have indicated instances when grid

stability analyses had not been updated by the licensees to reflect changes in the grid power

system. Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data study C97-01, "Grid Performance

Factors" dated March 20, 1997, identified a Oneed to monitor grid conditions on a regular basis."

Discussion

In 1988, NRC issued the station blackout (SBO) rule. The requirements of 10 CFR 50.63, "Loss

of All Alternating Current Power," specify that each light-water-cooled nuclear power plant be

able to withstand and recover from an SBO (i.e., a loss of offsite and onsite emergency ac power

sources) for a specified period. The NRC review of licensees' analyses to assess the

vulnerability of offsite power and the time required for recovery indicated that for most nuclear

power plant sites the grid was stable and reliable.

Historically, grid control is decentralized and each utility or a small group of utilities forms a

control area containing customers for which it Is jurisdictionally responsible. The control areas

form reliability councils that establish operating standards by consensus. These agreements, in

turn, became the factors that determine the reliability of the grid and the bases for the availability

of the offsite power system. Although the grid operating standards that evolved in the past

provided reasonable grid reliability, events like those discussed herein reveal vulnerabilities of

the electrical grid either through actual challenges or through licensee's analyses to assess the

adequacy of the offsite power system.

INS '7 Feb,--dry 27, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are

emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, power

suppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales to

customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple

combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance

related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized

independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be

defined, but It is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid

reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for

reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of

Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of

industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.

The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be

significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the

capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the

design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that

accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability

of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for

assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that

demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss of

nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.

Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses in

licensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with

respect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of

the nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power

plants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from

industry deregulation.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions

about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or

the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

orig /s/'d by

Jack W. Roe, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR

301415-2985 301415-1 176 E-Mail: rvj2nrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov

A-1T E~A FiL ;1 JAckETF

Attachment: Ust of recently issued Information Notices

OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 214198, PGEB Id 2/17198 (T. Essig),

AEOD Idc 2/12/98 (E.Rossi) & Tech Editor 1/27/98 DOCUMENT NAME: S:%DRPM SEC\98-07.IN - SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

To receive a copy of Nhis document, Indicate Inthe box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmenUendosure N =No copy l

OFFICE PECB I EELB I IEELB I PECB PECB LI DRPM A

NAME TKoshy* RJenkins* JCalvo* RDennig* SRichards* JRoe*

DATE 2/2/98 j 2/2/98 j 2/2/98 2/10/98 2/11/98 2/17/98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment

IN 98-07 February 27, 1998 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

98-06 Unauthorized Use of Ucense to 2/19198 All NRC licensees authorized to

Obtain Radioactive Materials, possess licensed material

And Its Implications Under The

Expanded Title 18 of the

U.S. Code

97-45, Supp. 1 Environmental Qualification 2/17/98 All holders of operating

Deficiency for Cables and licenses for nuclear power

Containment Penetration reactors except those licensees

Pigtails who have permanently ceased

operations and have certified that

the fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

98-05 Criminal History Record 2111/98 All holders of operating

Information licenses for power reactors

98-04 1997 Enforcement Sanctions for 2/9/98 All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

deliberate Violations of NRC Commission licensees

Employee Protection requirements

98-03 Inadequate Verification of 1/21/98 All holders of operating licenses

Overcurrent Trip Setpoints in for nuclear power reactors

Metal-Clad, Low-Voltage

Circuit Breakers

98-02 Nuclear Power Plant Cold 1/21/98 All holders of operating licenses

Weather Problems and for nuclear power reactors

Protective Measures

98-01 Thefts of Portable Gauges 1/15/98 All portable gauge licensees

97-91 Recent Failures of Control 12/31/97 All industrial radiography

Cables Used on Amersham licensees

Model 660 Posilock Radiography

Systems

97-90 Use of Nonconservative 12/30/97 All holders of OLs for nuclear

Acceptance Criteria in power reactors except those

Safety-Related Pump who have ceased operations

Surveillance Tests and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the vessel

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

IN9' Y

, Feb~Uyxx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are

emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It Is anticipated that in the future, power

suppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers, will actively compete for sales to

customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple

combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance

related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized

independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be

defined, but it Is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid

reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for

reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of

Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of

industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.

The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be

significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the

capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the

design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that

accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability

of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for

assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that

demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios Involving loss of

nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.

Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses in

licensees' processes, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with

respect to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of

the nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power

plants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from

industry deregulation.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions

about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or

the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Jack W. Roe, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR

301-415-2985 301-415-1176 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices

OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4198 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD - 'SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

To receive a copy of this document indicate Inthe box C=Copy wlo aftachmentlenclosure E d: .ATo osure N = No copy

[OFFICE lPECB lI EELB 1 _ EELB l PECB lI PECB I DRPM

NAME TKoshy* RJenkins* JCalvo* RDennig* lSRichards'Jle

l DATE j 2/2/98

_J___A_

[2/2/98 .

2/2/98 j 2/10/98 l-;1 /98

18-

1/98

1/ 8--

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY t CM I

Tre

ING' x

Febkty xx, 1998 The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are

emerging: non-utility generation and deregulation. It is anticipated that in the future, power

suppliers, whether utilities or Independent power producers, will a6tively compete for sales to

customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option creates multiple

combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance

related consequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized

independent system operators (ISOs). The responsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be

defined, but it is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will be charged with maintaining grid

reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanisms for

reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of

Energy has sponsored a Task Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of

industry deregulation on the Nation's electric power supply.

The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be

significantly influenced by the decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the

capability of the offsite power cannot be tested except when challenged in an actual event, the

design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an enveloping analysis that

accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability

of safety systems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for

assessing the adequacy of the offsite power system. It addresses grid analyses that

demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenarios involving loss of

nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.

Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weakness in

licensees' process, it is vital that licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with respect

to the reliability and stability of the offsite power sources do not degrade during the life of the

nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for nuclear power plants

are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from

industry deregulation.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions

about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or

the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Jack W. Roe, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR Thomas Koshy, NRR

301-415-2985 301-415-1176 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov E-Mail: txk@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices

OGC Concurrence (R. K Hoefling) 2/4/98 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ITXK\GRIDIN2.1WPD - SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

To receive a copy of this document, idicate hithe box C=Copy wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy

lOFFICE PECB I EELB _L EELB I - PECB l- DRPM_

NAME TKoshyl RJenkins* JCalvo* gnig ~ SRichards JRoe

l DATE I /== 2/2/9f 12/219°B9%

i ,I l I / I9t

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

IN "x

February xx, 1998 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed

below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Jack W. Roe, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Ronaldo V. Jenkins, NRR

301-415-2985 E-Mail: rvjenrc.gov

Thomas Koshy, NRR

301-415-1176 E-Mail: txkenrc.gov

Attachment: List of recently issued Information Notices

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\TXKAGRIDIN2.1WPD

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo atachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy

OFFICE l PECB lEELB EELB El I PECB I PECB l lDRPMl

NAME s RJenkins JCalvo /1 RDennig SRichards JRoe

l DATE 121249 I L,-,9l 212/t9 I / , II,9 , / W

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY