ML20206G404: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ | {{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ | ||
s k | |||
k | ys* ''% | ||
+ | |||
ys* ''% | d UNITED STATES i | ||
d | NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION y. j'' ij W A$mNO TON. D. C. 20655 c | ||
s.....f SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL PRORCTS EMPLOYEE CONCERN EttMENT REPORT CO 10107 I | |||
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL PRORCTS EMPLOYEE CONCERN EttMENT REPORT CO 10107 I | "BACKFILL WITH 1632" TENhESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY | ||
+ | |||
SEQUOYAk NUCLEAR F0WER PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 i | |||
l Subfect i | |||
Categcry: Construction (20000) i Subcategory: | |||
Soils (10100) i Elerent: | |||
Eacktill with 1032 (C0 10107) | |||
The basis for Element Report C010107-SQN (Rev. 2) dated 10-15-86 is Sequoyah | The basis for Element Report C010107-SQN (Rev. 2) dated 10-15-86 is Sequoyah l | ||
Employee Co.mcern JAN 56-CC2 which states: | |||
r | |||
if building founcation is constructed without removing backfilled | ** Excavation for DAW building foundation revealed red elay, various size rocks, etc. that were usea as a backfill material for the storage yard. | ||
material, an uneven settlement of building could occur." | if building founcation is constructed without removing backfilled | ||
Tha Sequoyah (SON) Lry Active Waste (DAW) building was being constructed on | [ | ||
J | material, an uneven settlement of building could occur." | ||
j II. | |||
Sumery of Issue Tha Sequoyah (SON) Lry Active Waste (DAW) building was being constructed on | |||
\\ | |||
J unsuitable backfill r:aterial that could result in uneven settlement. | |||
l | |||
( | ( | ||
r 111. Evaluation i | |||
1 TVA said that the decision was made that to remove the existing material and | 4 1 | ||
j TVA said that the decision was made that to remove the existing material and | |||
[ | |||
] | ] | ||
backfill with 1032-crushtd stone prior to building the foundation. This work | backfill with 1032-crushtd stone prior to building the foundation. This work | ||
j | [ | ||
j was perforced by TVA ano as the building was classified as non-QA, the mater- | |||
[ | |||
) | ial was randomly inspected by engir.eers, not QC inspectors. The concerned j | ||
r t.c le a r g r a :e c u e l l t,, c.s:uram s (rer.(A). Becaust of the classificaticn of tne builc;q. tr.s stai: :.oncl.. C tra? trere is no need to assess the | s l | ||
tr.tegrity of the foundation which is outs 1ce of the crea of staff regulation. | individual was contacted by TVA, and the evaluation report indicates that he was satisfied with the corrective actions taken, i | ||
1 | 1 j | ||
I | |||
!Y. | |||
Conclusien FSAk Secticn 3.2, "Seismic Classification of Strur.tures, Systens and Compo- | |||
) | |||
nents," incicates that the building is not classified as a Seismic Category I structure. The building is catecerized as non-seismic ano does not recuire l | |||
i i | |||
r t.c le a r g r a :e c u e l l t,, c.s:uram s (rer.(A). | |||
Becaust of the classificaticn of j | |||
tne builc;q. tr.s stai: :.oncl.. C tra? trere is no need to assess the tr.tegrity of the foundation which is outs 1ce of the crea of staff regulation. | |||
1 i | |||
l I | |||
8811220264 881104 i | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000327 P | |||
PDC l | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:20, 7 December 2024
| ML20206G404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah |
| Issue date: | 11/04/1988 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206G037 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8811220264 | |
| Download: ML20206G404 (1) | |
Text
_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _
s k
ys* %
+
d UNITED STATES i
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION y. j ij W A$mNO TON. D. C. 20655 c
s.....f SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL PRORCTS EMPLOYEE CONCERN EttMENT REPORT CO 10107 I
"BACKFILL WITH 1632" TENhESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
+
SEQUOYAk NUCLEAR F0WER PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 i
l Subfect i
Categcry: Construction (20000) i Subcategory:
Soils (10100) i Elerent:
Eacktill with 1032 (C0 10107)
The basis for Element Report C010107-SQN (Rev. 2) dated 10-15-86 is Sequoyah l
Employee Co.mcern JAN 56-CC2 which states:
r
- Excavation for DAW building foundation revealed red elay, various size rocks, etc. that were usea as a backfill material for the storage yard.
if building founcation is constructed without removing backfilled
[
material, an uneven settlement of building could occur."
j II.
Sumery of Issue Tha Sequoyah (SON) Lry Active Waste (DAW) building was being constructed on
\\
J unsuitable backfill r:aterial that could result in uneven settlement.
l
(
r 111. Evaluation i
4 1
j TVA said that the decision was made that to remove the existing material and
[
]
backfill with 1032-crushtd stone prior to building the foundation. This work
[
j was perforced by TVA ano as the building was classified as non-QA, the mater-
[
ial was randomly inspected by engir.eers, not QC inspectors. The concerned j
s l
individual was contacted by TVA, and the evaluation report indicates that he was satisfied with the corrective actions taken, i
1 j
I
!Y.
Conclusien FSAk Secticn 3.2, "Seismic Classification of Strur.tures, Systens and Compo-
)
nents," incicates that the building is not classified as a Seismic Category I structure. The building is catecerized as non-seismic ano does not recuire l
i i
r t.c le a r g r a :e c u e l l t,, c.s:uram s (rer.(A).
Becaust of the classificaticn of j
tne builc;q. tr.s stai: :.oncl.. C tra? trere is no need to assess the tr.tegrity of the foundation which is outs 1ce of the crea of staff regulation.
1 i
l I
8811220264 881104 i
PDR ADOCK 05000327 P
PDC l
-