ML20206G396

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SER Supporting Util Investigation of Employee Concerns as Described in Element Rept 308.03
ML20206G396
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1988
From:
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:
Shared Package
ML20206G037 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8811220261
Download: ML20206G396 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

e. .

p# A q'c.

s UNITED STATES

' ' .c . 'iI

[,?' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D. C,20S$6 ty~h , ,~/

..... t SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF SpECIAl. PROJECTS FOR EFPLOYEE CONCERNS SEQUQYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 EPPLOYEE CONCERNS XX-85-017-003. AND -004 DOCKET N05. 50-237. AND 50-238 l

1. SUBJECT Categcry: Operations l i

Subca tegory: Maintenance Element: Corrective haintenance  !

Cer.cerns : xx-05-071-003: The replacerent rain feedwater heaters f were instdlled without postweld teat treatment, as required. [

XX-ES-971-004: The replacement main feedwater heaters  !

were installed such that cold-springing of connected j piping had occurred. t

(

!!. SUMARY OF ISSUES f t

f 1. The replacement riain feedwater heaters were installed to the connected pipir.g without post weld beat treatment and this was incorrect as the ,

4 original heaters required post weld heat treatment.

1

! 2. The dimensions of the replacement heaters were different f ron  !

j the original heaters and cold-springing of the pipe nay have occurred when the replacement heaters were installed. [

, Ill. EVAL L'ATION The main feedwater heaters are not safety-related equipment. However, this item was reviewed for overall code compliance, f f

hot all of the piping connections to the main feedwater heaters were post weld f heat treated, but those that would be recuired to be so treated by the appli-catie fiele f abrication code, USAS B31.7-1969 as des,-ibed in the FSAR, tecause i

of wall thickness limits, were post weld heat treated as evicenced in the TVA

work plan .'ackages for the installation of the re;1acement heaters. TVA inter-  !

' views with the two engineers who approved this portion of the work and a pipe-  !

j fitter foreman who oversaw the wora revealed no evidence of excessive force having been applied to the piping. The applicable field fabricatior, code,  ;

R 1.7, c;es accress cold sprin;ing, ard states " Cold springirg provides a j l

teneficial effect ir. Assisting a system to attain its ecst favorable position  !

j :ccrer". Cold springing is ar'alyzed cr.ly when it it used to reduce piping  !

j rtaction forces in design.

)

I b0 , o 27 P PDC

O e IV. @ N!!SION The IEC .taff believes that the TVA investigation Of ine employee cer.cerns aas adequate, ar.d their resolution of the suocerns as described in Elemnt heport 308.03 is acceptable.

Principal Centributor: D. E. Smith I

l b

l 5 l

i l

I J

l

o

  • i  ;

i l .

xf:

?

I Ef;CLOSUPE 3 l

+

S AFETY EVAL'.".TIONS OF '.NE I TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTM*' TTY ,

Ef@LOYEE C0ftCEPNS SPECI AL PROGRAM ELEFENT REPORTS f i

TOP THE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT L

[

r t .

I i

i i

t i

I I

+

I h

i i

e t

!