ML20236K327: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS, PLEADINGS
| document type = LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS, PLEADINGS
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Supplement
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 07:08, 6 October 2021

Amend to 710709 Supplemental Motion to Aslab for Reconsideration Re PG&E Application for Permit to Construct Unit 2
ML20236K327
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1971
From: Eissler F
SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INC.
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20236J368 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-214 NUDOCS 8708070080
Download: ML20236K327 (2)


Text

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ __

, l

,- ,' JJITED STATES 09 A1EETCA (. ]

- ATOMIC-E NERGY-COMMISSION-l IN THE MATTER OF )

)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-323 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, )  !

Unit 2) )

Amendment to the SuoDiemental Motion for Reconsideration to the Atomic Safety and Licensing ADDeal Board Scenic Shoreline files the following amendment to the supplemental motion for reconsideration earlier filed July 9, 1971 in the matter i of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's application for a permit ]

i to construct Diablo Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 This amended motion is submitted in compliance with 10 CFR 2.771 and 2.764. j

\

In the light of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for tne Dis brict of Columbia Circuit (Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. , National Wild. life Federation and Sierra l

Club v. United States Atomic Energy Commission), the construction i

permit for Unit 2 granted by the Board has been invalidly granted and is a nullity. The percit is illegal because the applicant l and Commission have not pursued. the necessary procedures required i under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Ac.t of l 1970 (NEPA).

I Scenic Shoreline, therefcre, requests new hearings to consider j the environmental impact of Diablo Unit 2 in response to the courts decision that such environmental review be undertaken at the earliest j 1

possible date. It is not the intent of this amended motion to have a rehearing on all the issues already resolved by the Dcari although i our organization intends to seek remedy in court on those issues in contention if the appli:ation for construction is not finally l turned down, Scenic Shcreline does, however, reaffirm the importance of considering the eartlcuake design issue raised in our earlier l l

motion by Stanley E., Mendes, We also request review of new data l 8708070080 870729 t PDR FOIA f CONNORB7-214 PDR

(

~

t  ;

. .* u

. , , _ . . .3%.

ese " " ' * ' ' '

ec ;1]+1 by Ralph Vranc on cc stic ac ;1vi ty n 4f. Diabh re tr or.<

The se 'mtters can and Ehould be e part of thc! a6end t of the env. tron- .

1 1

_ mertal hearinga 1

?

' Scenic Shoreline ! s prepc. red to $ ni.tlate immediately its environmental studies in confer ance with ?TUA req: trements. I i

To speed up the reTiew prece::r. and to criole u ? to pecceed with 4

dicpatch, we request ecpies of thosc studies 'nich nust be completed t before necessary EPA hearings are scheduled, Speciffeally we request the enviremtental raport and the cotto .te r; taa agencies l

on tnis report, thc.dre.f t environmental stateasnt aid agency comments I

on this document, and the final report. We furthat regttest th=

opportunity to cocrent on the'ie reports at uhe z.py -priate stages cf the review processt Bospectftuir at ami tted .t

-P ,., f - ~ TY ,p

~~7L'g;5;M uu ( h %.srZ64 Frederick 31sejtr

?re ride nt Dated July 28, 19~1 )

J 1

,1 t

}

}

f

- _ _ - - _ - _ - - --