ML16250A057: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16250A057
| number = ML16250A057
| issue date = 09/01/2016
| issue date = 09/01/2016
| title = Station: Acceptance REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - North Anna Power Station: Acceptance REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003
| author name = Sreenivas V
| author name = Sreenivas V
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Heacock D A
| addressee name = Heacock D
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Energy Co
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Energy Co
| docket = 05000338, 05000339
| docket = 05000338, 05000339
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 2:23 PM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                           Sreenivas, V Sent:                           Thursday, September 01, 2016 2:23 PM To:                             'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)
Cc: Young, Austin; Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitke n@dom.com); Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)
Cc:                             Young, Austin; Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitken@dom.com); Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE RE VIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I 4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)
North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)
By letter dated July 27, 2016 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 16215A192), Dominion (the licensee) requested for North Anna Units No.1 and 2, an approval of the proposed inservice inspecti on (ISI) alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N2-14-NDE-003, to extend the interval for reactor vessel Examination Category 8-A and 8-D pressure retaining welds from 10 years to 20 year s in accordance with WCAP-16168-NP, Risk-Informed Extension of Reactor Vessel In-Service Inspection Interval. The pur pose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sta ff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if ther e is sufficient technica l information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requireme nts or the licensing bas is of the plant.  
By letter dated July 27, 2016 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS)
 
Accession No. ML16215A192), Dominion (the licensee) requested for North Anna Units No.1 and 2, an approval of the proposed inservice inspection (ISI) alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N2-14-NDE-003, to extend the interval for reactor vessel Examination Category 8-A and 8-D pressure retaining welds from 10 years to 20 years in accordance with WCAP-16168-NP, Risk-Informed Extension of Reactor Vessel In-Service Inspection Interval. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed the submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding t he acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compar ed to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequat e acceptance review. If ad ditional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed the submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
___________________
V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., CPM.,
V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., CPM., Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 301-415-2597  
Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 301-415-2597 1


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3036   Mail Envelope Properties   (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20160901142200)
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           3036 Mail Envelope Properties       (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20160901142200)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172) Sent Date:   9/1/2016 2:22:38 PM Received Date: 9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM From:   Sreenivas, V Created By:   V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Young, Austin" <Austin.Young@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitken@dom.com)" <diane.aitken@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)" <jay.leberstien@dom.com>
North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)
Tracking Status: None "'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)" <david.heacock@dom.com> Tracking Status: None  
Sent Date:               9/1/2016 2:22:38 PM Received Date:           9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM From:                   Sreenivas, V Created By:             V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Young, Austin" <Austin.Young@nrc.gov>
Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1998     9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitken@dom.com)" <diane.aitken@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None "Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)" <jay.leberstien@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)" <david.heacock@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                             Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                           1998                   9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM Options Priority:                         Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 00:30, 19 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - North Anna Power Station: Acceptance REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003
ML16250A057
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/2016
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D
Dominion Energy Co
References
MF8171, MF8172
Download: ML16250A057 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 2:23 PM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)

Cc: Young, Austin; Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitken@dom.com); Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)

Subject:

North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)

By letter dated July 27, 2016 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML16215A192), Dominion (the licensee) requested for North Anna Units No.1 and 2, an approval of the proposed inservice inspection (ISI) alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N2-14-NDE-003, to extend the interval for reactor vessel Examination Category 8-A and 8-D pressure retaining welds from 10 years to 20 years in accordance with WCAP-16168-NP, Risk-Informed Extension of Reactor Vessel In-Service Inspection Interval. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed the submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., CPM.,

Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 301-415-2597 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3036 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20160901142200)

Subject:

North Anna Power Station: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW- Relief Request Inservice Inspection Alternative N1-14-NDE-008 and N1-I4-NDE-003 (CAC Nos. MF8171 and MF8172)

Sent Date: 9/1/2016 2:22:38 PM Received Date: 9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Young, Austin" <Austin.Young@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Diane Aitken (Generation - 6) (diane.aitken@dom.com)" <diane.aitken@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None "Jay Leberstien (jay.leberstien@dom.com)" <jay.leberstien@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'david.heacock@dom.com' (david.heacock@dom.com)" <david.heacock@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1998 9/1/2016 2:22:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16250A057&oldid=2627101"