ML061000138: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061000138
| number = ML061000138
| issue date = 03/22/2006
| issue date = 03/22/2006
| title = 2006/03/22-GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
| title = GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
| author name = Morgan M
| author name = Morgan M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 1 AUDIT W ORKSHEET  GALL R EPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
{{#Wiki_filter:AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________                                                     REVIEWER: ______________________
R EVIEWER: ______________________
GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program                                           DATE: __________________________
GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program DATE: __________________________
Program               Auditable GALL Criteria                                           Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program               A. Implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65     Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Description            (the Maintenance Rule) is addressed in Nuclear Regulatory         Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Program Description A. Implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65 (the Maintenance Rule) is addressed in Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. These two documents provide guidance for development of licensee-specific programs to monitor the condition of structures and structural components within the scope of the Maintenance Rule, such that there is no loss of structure or structural component intended function.
Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. These two documents provide guidance for development of licensee-specific programs to monitor the condition of structures and structural components     Comment:
Because structures monitoring programs are licensee-specific, the Evaluation and Technical Basis for this aging management program (AMP) is based on the implementation guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. Existing licensee-specific programs developed for the implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65 are acceptable for license renewal provided these programs satisfy the 10 attributes described below. If protective coatings are relied upon to manage the effects of aging for any structures included in the scope of this AMP, the structures monitoring program is to address protective coating monitoring and maintenance. Consistent with GALL AMP:
within the scope of the Maintenance Rule, such that there is no loss of structure or structural component intended function.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Because structures monitoring programs are licensee-specific, the Evaluation and Technical Basis for this aging management program (AMP) is based on the implementation guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. Existing licensee-specific programs developed for the implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65 are acceptable for license renewal provided these programs satisfy the 10 attributes described below.
Comment: 1. Scope of Program A. The applicant specifies the structure/aging effect combinations that are managed by its structures monitoring program. Consistent with GALL AMP:
If protective coatings are relied upon to manage the effects of aging for any structures included in the scope of this AMP, the structures monitoring program is to address protective coating monitoring and maintenance.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
: 1. Scope of           A. The applicant specifies the structure/aging effect             Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Program                combinations that are managed by its structures monitoring       Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
program.
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program                                                    1


XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 2 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Comment 2. Preventive Actions A. No preventive actions are specified. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Program               Auditable GALL Criteria                                           Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
: 2. Preventive         A. No preventive actions are specified.                           Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Actions                                                                                  Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment: 3. Parameters Monitored/
Comment:
Inspected A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the specific parameters monitored or inspected are selected to ensure that aging degradation leading to loss of intended functions will be detected and the extent of degradation can be determined. Parameters monitored or inspected are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience.
: 3. Parameters         A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the specific       Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Monitored/            parameters monitored or inspected are selected to ensure that     Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for selection of parameters to be monitored or inspected for concrete and steel structural elements and for steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes (if applicable). If necessary for managing settlement and erosion of porous concrete subfoundations, the continued functionality of a site de-watering system is to be monitored. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on parameters monitored or inspected to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Inspected              aging degradation leading to loss of intended functions will be detected and the extent of degradation can be determined.
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
Parameters monitored or inspected are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also     Comment:
consider industry and plant-specific operating experience.
Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for selection of parameters to be monitored or inspected for concrete and steel structural elements and for steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes (if applicable). If necessary for managing settlement and erosion of porous concrete subfoundations, the continued functionality of a site de-watering system is to be monitored.
The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on parameters monitored or inspected to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.
: 4. Detection of        A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the inspection    Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Aging Effects          methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are    Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
selected to ensure that aging degradation will be detected and quantified before there is loss of intended functions. Inspection methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and              Comment:
guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program                                                    2


Comment: 4. Detection of Aging Effects A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the inspection methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are selected to ensure that aging degradation will be detected and quantified before there is loss of intended functions. Inspection methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for Consistent with GALL AMP:
Program                Auditable GALL Criteria                                            Documentation of Audit Finding Element addressing detection of aging effects. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on detection to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
: 5. Monitoring          A. Regulatory Position 1.5, "Monitoring of Structures," in RG      Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No and Trending          1.160, Rev. 2, provides an acceptable basis for meeting the        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
attribute. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(2) provided there is no significant degradation of the structure. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(1) if the extent of degradation is such that the  Comment:
structure may not meet its design basis or, if allowed to continue uncorrected until the next normally scheduled assessment, may not meet its design basis.
: 6. Acceptance          A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the acceptance      Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Criteria              criteria are selected to ensure that the need for corrective        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
actions will be identified before loss of intended functions.
Acceptance criteria are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not     Comment:
required, ACI 349.3R-96 provides an acceptable basis for developing acceptance criteria for concrete structural elements, steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on acceptance criteria to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.
: 7. Corrective          A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Actions                requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
address the corrective actions.
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program                                                      3


Program                Auditable GALL Criteria                                            Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment:
: 8.                    A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Confirmation          requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Process                address the confirmation process.
Comment:
: 9.                    A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Administrative        requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Controls              address the administrative controls.
Comment:
: 10. Operating          A. Although in many plants structures monitoring programs have Consistent with GALL AMP:            Yes  No Experience            only recently been implemented, plant maintenance has been          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
ongoing since initial plant operation. A plant-specific program that includes the attributes described above will be an effective AMP for license renewal.
Comment:
Comment:
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 3 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  addressing detection of aging effects. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on detection to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied. 5. Monitoring and Trending A. Regulatory Position 1.5, "Monitoring of Structures," in RG 1.160, Rev. 2, provides an acceptable basis for meeting the attribute. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(2) provided there is no significant degradation of the structure. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(1) if the extent of degradation is such that the structure may not meet its design basis or, if allowed to continue uncorrected until the next normally scheduled assessment, may not meet its design basis. Consistent with GALL AMP:
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program                                                     4
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:


Comment: 6. Acceptance Criteria A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the acceptance criteria are selected to ensure that the need for corrective actions will be identified before loss of intended functions. Acceptance criteria are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 provides an acceptable basis for developing acceptance criteria for concrete structural elements, steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on acceptance criteria to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied. Consistent with GALL AMP:
EXCEPTIONS Item          Program Elements              LRA Exception Description  Basis for Accepting Exception  Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
1.
2.


Comment: 7. Corrective Actions A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions. Consistent with GALL AMP:
ENHANCEMENTS Item          Program Elements              LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
1.
2.


XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 4 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  Comment: 8. Confirmation Process A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the confirmation process. Consistent with GALL AMP:
DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number                     Identifier (number)       Title                                                 Revision and/or Date 1.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
2.
 
3.
Comment: 9.
4.
Administrative Controls A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the administrative controls. Consistent with GALL AMP:
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program                                              5}}
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
 
Comment: 10. Operating Experience A. Although in many plants structures monitoring programs have only recently been implemented, plant maintenance has been ongoing since initial plant operation. A plant-specific program that includes the attributes described above will be an effective AMP for license renewal. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
 
Comment:
XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 5 EXCEPTIONS  Item Number Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
ENHANCEMENTS Item Number Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
DOCUMENT REVIEWED D URING A UDIT  Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1. 2. 3. 4.   -.}}

Latest revision as of 07:40, 14 March 2020

GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
ML061000138
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/2006
From: Morgan M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
morgan M NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232
Shared Package
ML060950189 List: ... further results
References
%dam200611, TAC MC9668
Download: ML061000138 (6)


Text

AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________

LRA AMP: __________________________ REVIEWER: ______________________

GALL AMP: XI.S6, Structures Monitoring Program DATE: __________________________

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program A. Implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65 Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Description (the Maintenance Rule) is addressed in Nuclear Regulatory Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. These two documents provide guidance for development of licensee-specific programs to monitor the condition of structures and structural components Comment:

within the scope of the Maintenance Rule, such that there is no loss of structure or structural component intended function.

Because structures monitoring programs are licensee-specific, the Evaluation and Technical Basis for this aging management program (AMP) is based on the implementation guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.160, Rev. 2, and NUMARC 93-01, Rev. 2. Existing licensee-specific programs developed for the implementation of structures monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65 are acceptable for license renewal provided these programs satisfy the 10 attributes described below.

If protective coatings are relied upon to manage the effects of aging for any structures included in the scope of this AMP, the structures monitoring program is to address protective coating monitoring and maintenance.

1. Scope of A. The applicant specifies the structure/aging effect Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Program combinations that are managed by its structures monitoring Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

program.

XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 1

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment

2. Preventive A. No preventive actions are specified. Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

3. Parameters A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the specific Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Monitored/ parameters monitored or inspected are selected to ensure that Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Inspected aging degradation leading to loss of intended functions will be detected and the extent of degradation can be determined.

Parameters monitored or inspected are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also Comment:

consider industry and plant-specific operating experience.

Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for selection of parameters to be monitored or inspected for concrete and steel structural elements and for steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes (if applicable). If necessary for managing settlement and erosion of porous concrete subfoundations, the continued functionality of a site de-watering system is to be monitored.

The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on parameters monitored or inspected to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.

4. Detection of A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the inspection Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Aging Effects methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

selected to ensure that aging degradation will be detected and quantified before there is loss of intended functions. Inspection methods, inspection schedule, and inspector qualifications are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and Comment:

guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not required, ACI 349.3R-96 and ANSI/ASCE 11-90 provide an acceptable basis for XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 2

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element addressing detection of aging effects. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on detection to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.

5. Monitoring A. Regulatory Position 1.5, "Monitoring of Structures," in RG Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No and Trending 1.160, Rev. 2, provides an acceptable basis for meeting the Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

attribute. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(2) provided there is no significant degradation of the structure. A structure is monitored in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(1) if the extent of degradation is such that the Comment:

structure may not meet its design basis or, if allowed to continue uncorrected until the next normally scheduled assessment, may not meet its design basis.

6. Acceptance A. For each structure/aging effect combination, the acceptance Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Criteria criteria are selected to ensure that the need for corrective Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

actions will be identified before loss of intended functions.

Acceptance criteria are to be commensurate with industry codes, standards and guidelines, and are to also consider industry and plant-specific operating experience. Although not Comment:

required, ACI 349.3R-96 provides an acceptable basis for developing acceptance criteria for concrete structural elements, steel liners, joints, coatings, and waterproofing membranes. The plant-specific structures monitoring program is to contain sufficient detail on acceptance criteria to conclude that this program attribute is satisfied.

7. Corrective A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

address the corrective actions.

XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 3

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Comment:

8. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Confirmation requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Process address the confirmation process.

Comment:

9. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Administrative requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Controls address the administrative controls.

Comment:

10. Operating A. Although in many plants structures monitoring programs have Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Experience only recently been implemented, plant maintenance has been Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

ongoing since initial plant operation. A plant-specific program that includes the attributes described above will be an effective AMP for license renewal.

Comment:

XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 4

EXCEPTIONS Item Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

ENHANCEMENTS Item Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1.

2.

3.

4.

XI.S6 Structures Monitoring Program 5