ML103140637: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:26 PM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: 'Tom.Shaub@dom.com'; Kulesa, Gloria; Cotton, Karen; Huang, Tai  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Sreenivas, V Sent:                       Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:26 PM To:                         'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc:                         'Tom.Shaub@dom.com'; Kulesa, Gloria; Cotton, Karen; Huang, Tai


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and ME4934
NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and ME4934


==Dear Mr. Heacock:==
==Dear Mr. Heacock:==


By letter dated October 21, 2010, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted an amendment request for addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA for North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
By letter dated October 21, 2010, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted an amendment request for addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA for North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.
Sincerely, VSreenivas _____________________ V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., Project Manager, DORL/LPL2-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov Mail Stop: O8-G9A Docket No.:
Sincerely, VSreenivas V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
50-338 and 50-339 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  
Project Manager, DORL/LPL2-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov Mail Stop: O8-G9A Docket No.: 50-338 and 50-339 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and ME4934 Sent Date:        11/10/2010 2:17:20 PM Received Date:        11/10/2010 2:25:00 PM From:                Sreenivas, V
NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and
 
Created By:        V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov


Recipients:
ME4934 Sent Date:      11/10/2010 2:17:20 PM Received Date:      11/10/2010 2:25:00 PM From:          Sreenivas, V Created By:      V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:
david.heacock@dom.com ('david.heacock@dom.com')
david.heacock@dom.com ('david.heacock@dom.com')
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None
        'Tom.Shaub@dom.com' ('Tom.Shaub@dom.com')
      'Tom.Shaub@dom.com' ('Tom.Shaub@dom.com')
Tracking Status: None Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov (Kulesa, Gloria)
Tracking Status: None Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov (Kulesa, Gloria)
Tracking Status: None Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov (Cotton, Karen)
Tracking Status: None Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov (Cotton, Karen)
Tracking Status: None Tai.Huang@nrc.gov (Huang, Tai)
Tracking Status: None Tai.Huang@nrc.gov (Huang, Tai)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         13722     11/10/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:  
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       13722       11/10/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 11:28, 11 March 2020

Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA-TAC ME4933 and ME4934
ML103140637
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 11/10/2010
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D
Dominion
Sreenivas V.NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 415-2597
References
TAC ME4933, TAC ME4934
Download: ML103140637 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:26 PM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: 'Tom.Shaub@dom.com'; Kulesa, Gloria; Cotton, Karen; Huang, Tai

Subject:

NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and ME4934

Dear Mr. Heacock:

By letter dated October 21, 2010, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted an amendment request for addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA for North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.

Sincerely, VSreenivas V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,

Project Manager, DORL/LPL2-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-2597, v.sreenivas@nrc.gov Mail Stop: O8-G9A Docket No.: 50-338 and 50-339 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

NORTH ANNA UNIT 1 AND 2-Acceptance Review of Addition of Analytical Methodology to COLR Best-Estimate Large Break LOCA -TAC ME4933 and

ME4934 Sent Date: 11/10/2010 2:17:20 PM Received Date: 11/10/2010 2:25:00 PM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:

david.heacock@dom.com ('david.heacock@dom.com')

Tracking Status: None

'Tom.Shaub@dom.com' ('Tom.Shaub@dom.com')

Tracking Status: None Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov (Kulesa, Gloria)

Tracking Status: None Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov (Cotton, Karen)

Tracking Status: None Tai.Huang@nrc.gov (Huang, Tai)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 13722 11/10/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML103140637&oldid=2553726"