ML14238A726: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/10/2014
| issue date = 09/10/2014
| title = Summary of Conference Call Held on July 30, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations  Inc., Regarding a Draft Request for Additional Information on Removal of Certain Aging Management Review Items
| title = Summary of Conference Call Held on July 30, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations  Inc., Regarding a Draft Request for Additional Information on Removal of Certain Aging Management Review Items
| author name = Green K J
| author name = Green K
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RASB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR/RASB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = Meeting Summary
| document type = Meeting Summary
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
| project =
| stage = Draft RAI
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 10, 2014 LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
-0001 September 10, 2014 LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
 
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy or the applicant)
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 30, 2014, regarding draft request for additional information (RAI) 3.4.2.1-1 transmitted to Entergy by e-mail dated June 30, 2014. A list of the participants is enclosed.
, held a conference call on July 30, 2014, regarding draft request for additional information (RAI) 3.4.2.1
By letter dated September 26, 2012, Entergy provided changes to aging management review (AMR) tables in its license renewal application (LRA). Upon review of the information, the staff questioned the removal of specific AMR items that were previously identified as subject to cracking due to fatigue, which were to be managed by the metal fatigue time-limited aging analysis (TLAA). Therefore, by e-mail dated June 30, 2014, the staff sent a draft RAI to Entergy regarding the basis provided for removal of the specific AMR items.
-1 transmitted to Entergy by e
After subsequent discussion among the NRC staff, it requested a call with Entergy to provide clarification on its draft RAI. During the call, the staff stated that what it needed to understand was whether Entergys basis for removing the AMR items was that the aging effect did not apply because of a temperature threshold or if Entergy was saying that it eliminated the TLAA.
-mail dated June 30, 2014.
Entergy stated that the TLAA does not apply to the specific components because the components do not experience the temperatures where cracking due to fatigue is an aging effect of concern; however, the TLAA still exists and had not been eliminated. Entergy stated that its approach is supported by information in the EPRI Fatigue Management Handbook, and Appendix H to the EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Appendix H to EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools suggests that cracking due to fatigue is not a concern for non-reactor coolant pressure boundary in-line stainless steel components if the maximum temperature of the fluid is less than 270 °F, and is not a concern for non-reactor coolant pressure boundary in-line carbon steel components if the maximum fluid temperature is less than 220 °F.
A list of the participants is enclosed.
By letter dated September 26, 2012, Entergy provided changes to aging management review (AMR) tables in its license renewal application (LRA). Upon review of the information, the staff questioned the removal of specific AMR items that were previously identified as subject to cracking due to fatigue, which were to be managed by the metal fatigue time
-limited aging analys is (TLAA). Therefore, by e
-mail dated June 30, 2014, the staff sent a draft RAI to Entergy regarding the basis provided for removal of the specific AMR items.
After subsequent discussion among the NRC staff, it requested a call with Entergy to provide clarification on its draft RAI. During the call, the staff stated that what it needed to understand was whether Entergy's basis for removing the AMR items was that the aging effect did not apply because of a temperature threshold or if Entergy was saying that it eliminat ed the TLAA.


Entergy stated that the TLAA does not apply to the specific components because the components do not experience the temperatures where cracking due to fatigue is an aging effect of concern; however, the TLAA still exists and had not been eliminated. Entergy stated that its approach is supported by information in the EPRI Fatigue Management Handbook, and Appendix H to the EPRI Non
The staff considered the information in Appendix H to the EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Based on the staffs review of the information, it determined that no additional information is required. Therefore, the staff will not issue a formal RAI.
-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Appendix H to EPRI Non
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools suggests that cracking due to fatigue is not a concern for non
                                                /RA/
-reactor coolant pressure boundary in
Kimberly J. Green, Sr. Mechanical Engineer Aging Management of Plant Systems Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
-line stainless steel components if the maximum temperature of the fluid is less than 270 °F, and is not a concern for non
-reactor coolant pressure boundary in
-line carbon steel components if the maximum fluid temperature is less than 220 °F.
The staff considered the information in Appendix H to the EPRI Non
-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Based on the staff's review of the information, it determined that no additional information is required. Therefore, the staff will not issue a formal RAI
. The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
  /RA/ Kimberly J. Green, Sr. Mechanical Engineer Aging Management of Plant Systems Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50
-247 and 50
-286


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==


List of Participants  
List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv
 
cc w/encl: Listserv


ML14238A726
ML14238A726                                     *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE     LA: DLR/RPB2*     PM: DLR/RAPB BC: RPB1:DLR PM: DLR/RAPB NAME       IKing             KGreen             YDiaz           KGreen DATE       9/2/2014           9/10/14           9/10/14         9/10/14
    *concurrence via e
-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB2
* PM: DLR/RAPB BC: RPB1:DLR PM: DLR/RAPB NAME IKing KGreen YDiaz KGreen DATE 9/2/2014 9/10/14 9/10/14 9/10/14    


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS   HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDeE vib Resource RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsNrrPMIndianPoint RidsOgcMailCenter Resource
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS HARD COPY:
-------------
DLR RF E-MAIL:
YDiaz MGray, RI KGreen ABurritt, RI JPoehler DonaldJackson, RI SRosenberg MModes, RI AHiser NSheehan, RI OPA AustinYoung DScrenci, RI OPA GCheruvenki DTifft, RI STurk, OGC NMcNamara, RI BMizuno, OGC GNewman, RI DRoth, OGC JSStewart, RI BHarris, OGC AmiPatel, RI SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDeEvib Resource RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsNrrPMIndianPoint RidsOgcMailCenter Resource YDiaz                 MGray, RI KGreen               ABurritt, RI JPoehler             DonaldJackson, RI SRosenberg           MModes, RI AHiser               NSheehan, RI OPA AustinYoung           DScrenci, RI OPA GCheruvenki           DTifft, RI STurk, OGC           NMcNamara, RI BMizuno, OGC         GNewman, RI DRoth, OGC           JSStewart, RI BHarris, OGC         AmiPatel, RI SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA


ENCLOSURE TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 30, 2014   PARTICIPANT S AFFILIATION Kim Green U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 30, 2014 PARTICIPANTS                              AFFILIATION Kim Green                                 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Allen Hiser NRC Roger Waters Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Allen Hiser                               NRC Roger Waters                             Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Charlie Caputo Entergy John Curry Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Alan Cox Entergy}}
Charlie Caputo                           Entergy John Curry                               Entergy Ted Ivy                                   Entergy Alan Cox                                 Entergy ENCLOSURE}}

Latest revision as of 19:06, 5 February 2020

Summary of Conference Call Held on July 30, 2014, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., Regarding a Draft Request for Additional Information on Removal of Certain Aging Management Review Items
ML14238A726
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2014
From: Kimberly Green
NRC/NRR/DLR/RASB
To:
Green K, 415-1627
References
Download: ML14238A726 (5)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 10, 2014 LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 30, 2014, regarding draft request for additional information (RAI) 3.4.2.1-1 transmitted to Entergy by e-mail dated June 30, 2014. A list of the participants is enclosed.

By letter dated September 26, 2012, Entergy provided changes to aging management review (AMR) tables in its license renewal application (LRA). Upon review of the information, the staff questioned the removal of specific AMR items that were previously identified as subject to cracking due to fatigue, which were to be managed by the metal fatigue time-limited aging analysis (TLAA). Therefore, by e-mail dated June 30, 2014, the staff sent a draft RAI to Entergy regarding the basis provided for removal of the specific AMR items.

After subsequent discussion among the NRC staff, it requested a call with Entergy to provide clarification on its draft RAI. During the call, the staff stated that what it needed to understand was whether Entergys basis for removing the AMR items was that the aging effect did not apply because of a temperature threshold or if Entergy was saying that it eliminated the TLAA.

Entergy stated that the TLAA does not apply to the specific components because the components do not experience the temperatures where cracking due to fatigue is an aging effect of concern; however, the TLAA still exists and had not been eliminated. Entergy stated that its approach is supported by information in the EPRI Fatigue Management Handbook, and Appendix H to the EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Appendix H to EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools suggests that cracking due to fatigue is not a concern for non-reactor coolant pressure boundary in-line stainless steel components if the maximum temperature of the fluid is less than 270 °F, and is not a concern for non-reactor coolant pressure boundary in-line carbon steel components if the maximum fluid temperature is less than 220 °F.

The staff considered the information in Appendix H to the EPRI Non-Class 1 Mechanical Implementation Guideline and Mechanical Tools. Based on the staffs review of the information, it determined that no additional information is required. Therefore, the staff will not issue a formal RAI.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA/

Kimberly J. Green, Sr. Mechanical Engineer Aging Management of Plant Systems Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv

ML14238A726 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB2* PM: DLR/RAPB BC: RPB1:DLR PM: DLR/RAPB NAME IKing KGreen YDiaz KGreen DATE 9/2/2014 9/10/14 9/10/14 9/10/14

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 30, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING A DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN AGING MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEMS HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDeEvib Resource RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsNrrPMIndianPoint RidsOgcMailCenter Resource YDiaz MGray, RI KGreen ABurritt, RI JPoehler DonaldJackson, RI SRosenberg MModes, RI AHiser NSheehan, RI OPA AustinYoung DScrenci, RI OPA GCheruvenki DTifft, RI STurk, OGC NMcNamara, RI BMizuno, OGC GNewman, RI DRoth, OGC JSStewart, RI BHarris, OGC AmiPatel, RI SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 30, 2014 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATION Kim Green U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Allen Hiser NRC Roger Waters Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Charlie Caputo Entergy John Curry Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Alan Cox Entergy ENCLOSURE