ML17279A234: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:87042903i6 870422 PDR ADQCN 05000397 P PDR WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT March, 1987 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER 4N SUPPLY SYSTEM 40993.1A)CT 1984 Prepared By Performance Evaluation WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT FOREWARD The purpose of this report is to furnish Supply System management with performance data in selected key operational areas.The data is graphically di splayed to provide visual trends and present comparisons with industry data, Supply System Corporate goals and WNP-2 plant goals.The report is anticipated to be dynamic.Indicators will be added or deleted, as appropriate, to define problem areas and display performance trends.
{{#Wiki_filter:87042903i6 870422 PDR ADQCN 05000397 P             PDR WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT March, 1987 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER 4N SUPPLY SYSTEM 40993.1A
)CT 1984


WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents OPERATIONS Net Electrical Generation Unit Availability Factor Unit Capacity Factor Unit Equivalent Availability Factor Plant Thermal Efficiency Forced Outages Unplanned Scrams Unplanned Safety System Actuations Control Room Instrument Operability MAINTENANCE MWR Status Preventive Maintenance Status Equipment Out-of-Service TECHNICAL Plant Modifications Plant Drawing Revision Plant Drawing Revision Backlog Non-Conformance Reports Licensee Event Reports HP/CHEMISTRY Personnel Exposure Solid Radwaste Liquid Radwaste Fuel Reliability Plant Contaminated Areas Personnel Contami nations Water Chemistry ADMINISTRATION Plant Staffing Plant Personnel Turnover Plant Overtime Plant Procedure Deviations NRC Violations Frequency~of Re ort Responsible Or anization Plant Operations Plant Operations Plant Operations Plant Operations Plant Technical Plant Operations Plant Operations Plant Technical Plant Operations Plant Maintenance Plant Maintenance Plant Maintenance Engineering/Rcrds Mgmt Records Management Records Management Plant Technical Plant Technical Radi ological Radiological Radiological Radiological Radiological Radiological Plant HP/Chemistry Plant Administration Plant Administration Plant Administration Plant Administration Plant Administration
Prepared By Performance Evaluation WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT FOREWARD The purpose  of this report is to furnish Supply System management with performance data in selected key operational areas. The data is graphically di splayed to provide visual trends and present comparisons with industry data, Supply System Corporate goals and WNP-2 plant goals. The report is anticipated to be dynamic. Indicators will be added or deleted, as appropriate, to define problem areas and display performance trends.
~Pa e 10 ll 12 13'4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 I
WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents TRAINING Frequency~of Re ort Responsible Or anization~Pa e Student Hours of Training Classroom (Instructor)
Hours of Training NRC Exam Performance UAL ITY ASSURANCE M Q Technical Training 30 Technical Training 31 Technical Training.32 QA Audit Def icienc ies Q QA Surveillance Deficiencies Q Operating Experience Review Status M SER/SOER Status M SUPPORT SERVICES Employee Safety Site Support Contract Securi ty MATERIAL MANAGEMENT Quality Assurance Quality Assurance NSAG NSAG Saf ety Mods/Upgrades Securi ty 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Spare Parts Contracts/Mat'1 Control 40 0 v, C NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION The graphs below depict WNP-2's monthly and year-to-date net electrical generation in megawatt hours as reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission per Regulatory Guide 1.16.MONTHLY NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION WNP-2 bOO Cll CC N C O Vl 0 5~I le dOO 0 J F'A M J J A S 0 N D CY 10bd a ACTUAL J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1sbV'SCHEDULED CUMULATIVE NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION WNP 2 O~VI C I I gx Lal J F'A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CY 19bT a ACTUAL o SCHEDULED This Month: The plant generated 516,206 MWH's during the month of March, continuing to operate in single loop configuration due to exces-sive vibration of"A" recirculating pump.The year-to-date total electrical generation is 1,487,899 MWH's and the cumulative since commercial operation is 12,257,896 MWH's.'


UNIT AVAILABILITY FACTOR Unit Availability Factor is the ratio of the Unit Available Hours (i.e., the sum of the total clock hours during the period that the generator operated on line plus the total clock hours during the period that the unit was in reserve shutdown, that is capable of operating on line,but for some reason did not)to the total clock hours contained in the period.The result is multiplied by 100 to express the factor as a percent.Unit Availabilit Factor=(Unit Available Hours)(100)
WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency          Responsible
Tota C oc Hours s n Per)o The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Availability Factor for WNP-2 as it relates to the 1985 industry average for BWRs.1 20%110%1 O0%g&O%U NIT AVAILABILITY FACTO B WNP 2 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1QSd a ACTUAL J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 1 987 198d IHD AVO This Month: Unit availability for the month of March was 92.29%.The year-to-date unit availability is 91.43'X and the cumulative since commercial operation is 77.12%.
                                        ~of Re ort        Or anization      ~Pa  e OPERATIONS Net  Electrical Generation                      Plant Operations Unit Availability Factor                       Plant Operations Unit Capacity Factor                            Plant Operations Unit Equivalent Availability Factor                                       Plant  Operations Plant Thermal Efficiency                        Plant  Technical Forced Outages                                  Plant  Operations Unplanned Scrams                                Plant  Operations Unplanned Safety System Actuations                                    Plant Technical Control Room Instrument Operability                                  Plant Operations MAINTENANCE MWR  Status                                    Plant Maintenance        10 Preventive Maintenance Status                  Plant Maintenance        ll Equipment Out-of-Service                        Plant Maintenance        12 TECHNICAL Plant Modifications                            Engineering/Rcrds  Mgmt  13  '4 Plant Drawing Revision                          Records Management Plant Drawing Revision Backlog                  Records Management        15 Non-Conformance Reports                        Plant Technical          16 Licensee Event Reports                          Plant Technical          17 HP/CHEMISTRY Personnel  Exposure                            Radi ological            18 Solid Radwaste                                  Radiological              19 Liquid Radwaste                                Radiological              20 Fuel  Reliability                              Radiological              21 Plant Contaminated Areas                        Radiological              22 Personnel Contami nations                      Radiological              23 Water Chemistry                                Plant HP/Chemistry        24 ADMINISTRATION Plant  Staffing                                Plant  Administration    25 Plant  Personnel Turnover                      Plant  Administration    26 Plant  Overtime                                Plant  Administration    27 Plant  Procedure Deviations                    Plant  Administration    28 NRC  Violations                                Plant  Administration    29
UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR Unit Capacity Factor is the ratio of the net electrical energy generated during a given period of time to the maximum dependable capacity (MDC), times the total number of clock hours during the period.i e-Unit Ca acit Factor=Net Electrical Ener Generated x 100 Maximum Dependable Capacity x Period Hours The first graph below depicts the monthly capacity factor as it relates to the 1985 industry averages for BWRs.The second graph depicts the cumulative capacity factor from commercial"operation through the current month.UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR 1 2C%1 1 O%1 00%BC'C%b~bO%P sow J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Sbe a ACTUAL CY 10bT o 10bb IND AVO CUMULATIVE UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%This Month: J F M A M J J A.S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9bÃCUMULATIVE CAP FAC Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of"A" recirculating pump.The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91%and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.
0 H I'I UNIT EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR x 100%Gross Maximum Capacity x en od Hours The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Equivalent Availability Factor of MNP-2 as it relates to the plant's FY 87 goal of 7(5.Per INPO, the 1985 industry average was 63.8'X.The Equivalent Availability Factor is the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage.
Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations.
Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at a maximum capacity.Discretionary operations below maximum permitted power for economic reasons such as reserve shutdowns do not reduce equivalent availability.
Gross Available Equi valent Unit Equi valent Seasonal Maximum Hours-Derated Hours-Derated Hours Capacity EAF=UNIT E EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACT OR WHP-2'1 1C%1 OC%g QC%SC%7C%SC%SC%Pg 4C%I 5 SC%2C%J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 1 Odd a CURRENT MOHTH J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1N7 o WHP 2 COAL This Month: The unit equivalent availability factor for March was 66.74K, operating in single loop configuration due to excessive vibra-tion of"A" recirculating pump.The year-to-date equivalent availability factor is 64.6%and the cumulative since commercial operation is 59.49%.


PLANT THERl1AL EFFICIENCY The graphs below depict the monthly and cumulative heat rate (BTUs/Kwhr) since commercial operation.
I WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency          Responsible
The third graph presents the plant's thermal efficiency expressed as a percent of the calculated design performance.
                                        ~of Re ort        Or  anization      ~Pa  e TRAINING Student Hours of Training                      Technical Training          30 Classroom  (Instructor) Hours of Training                          M      Technical Training          31 NRC Exam  Performance                  Q     Technical Training      . 32 UAL ITY ASSURANCE QA Audit Def icienc ies                Q      Quality Assurance          33 QA Surveillance Deficiencies            Q      Quality Assurance          34 Operating Experience Review Status      M     NSAG                        35 SER/SOER Status                        M     NSAG                        36 SUPPORT SERVICES Employee Safety                               Saf ety                    37 Site Support Contract                          Mods/Upgrades              38 Securi ty                                      Securi ty                  39 MATERIAL MANAGEMENT Spare Parts                                    Contracts/Mat'1 Control    40
For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to maintain an overall plant thermal efficiency that will be better than 96%of the design thermal efficiency.
22 20 ld~4~~0 2 PLANT TIIERMAL PERFORMANCE WHA>>2~0.$$~0.$A~0$$~Ck.$2 TO.$l~0.$~0 2Y ld 2$ld 2A ld 2$~0 22 PLANT THERMAL PERFORMANCE WHd<<2~ddd MDUSTIIY AVCSAOC SIN Y SYSTCM YYSY COAL J 2 V A V J J A S 0 H 0 J T V A V J J A S 0 H D CY~444 CUSIICHT MOHTH J F II A V J J A S 0 H 0 0 CUMGL O'Ad J 2 V A M J J*S 0 H D SIDUSTdf AVVIIAOC F 20~IO PLANT THERMAL EFFICIENCY WHA 2 IIY~T T4ASLT 40AL 20~0 J Y M A M J'J A S 0 H 0 J 2 V A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY~ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month: The cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.
FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity.
Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages.The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate.For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours of unscheduled (forced)outage per calendar quarter.Forced Outa e Hours Force utage ours+ours enerator n one HOUBS OF FORCED OUTAGE TIME WHP 2 TOO Q 800 Cl A.OO 8OO Ch 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL 1 DC'F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE BATE WNP 2 EK lal CP 0 Ch O This Month: J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 1 98T QQg CURRENT MONTH 4 5 During the month of March, there were 57.33 forced outage hours for a forced outage rate of 8%.
UNPLANNED SCRAMS An unplanned scram is defined as the actuation of the reactor protection system that results in a scram signal any time the reactor is critical.The signal may be automatically initiated as the result of exceeding a setpoint or manually initiated by the control room operator depressing the scram button.The graph below depicts the number of unplanned scrams, both manual and automatic, that occurred while the reactor was critical and required the initiation of a Licensee Event Report.Scrams that are planned as part of special evolutions or tests are not included in this indicator.
For FY 87, the MNP-2 goal is to not exceed three unplanned scrams during the fiscal year.Per INPO, the 1986 industry average was 3.9 scrams per unit.10 UNPLANNED SCBAMS WNP-2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N 0%26 Qdd CY 1sd7 MANUAL Qg3g AUTO MAY IC This Month: During the month of March, there was one unplanned manual scram.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS An Unplanned Safety System Actuation is defined as an event or condition that results in an unplanned manual or automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF).The two major ESF systems included in this indicator are the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)and the Emergency AC Power system.ECCS actuations are the result of reaching a setpoint which activates one of the following systems: automatic depressurization system, high pressure core spray, low pressure coolant injection and low pressure core spray systems.Emergency AC power actuations are a result of loss of a safeguards bus.The graph below depicts the number of unplanned actuations of the ECCS and Emergency AC Power Systems only.The FY 87 goal for MNP-2 is to not exceed one unplanned ECCS challenge per quarter.UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTVATIO NS WNP I I Cl J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F'A M J J A S O N D CY'0 96T AC POWER QQg ECCS CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours.The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason.This includes instruments on control room back panels.CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED ANNUNCIATORS WNP 2 C)I c3 Cl lal 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 1 10 100 eo 7'0 60 60 40 60 20 10 0 I 0 C IL'F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bb CY 19'URRENT MONTH CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S OUT OF SERVICE WNP-2 24 20 16 16 Q 14 12 Q 10 5 6 6 III Cl I 0 C ll K J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 1 96T OUT OF SERVICE


MAINTENANCE WORK RE(VEST STATUS The Maintenance Work Request (MWR)is the document control used to initiate and record maintenance activities and plant modifications performed by the Plant Maintenance staff at the plant site.The monthly status of the WNP-2 MWRs (i.e., those issued, closed, and remaining open at month's end)is graphically displayed below.Also depicted is a breakout of MWRs requiring outage conditions to complete.Preventive maintenance items are not included as a part of MWRs.MAINTENANCE WORK REQUEST STATUS~,~~,5~,4~2~2 I~Ij 05 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 I 0 J F M A M J J A 5 0 H D J P M A M J J A 5 0 H 0~gag 125IscP~cs.Deco gag X%+5<<HO OUTAGE 8c NONOUTAGE MWR BACKLOG WHP 2~.5~5~A~2 OA 02 02 0 1 0 J P M A M J J A 5 0 5ACICLQ~5~0 H 0 J II'A M J J A 5 0 H D OUTA OC e OT4ovfAo2~,5~,5 IA I 2~2 CLASS-I MWR'S IN THE BACKLOG WHP 2 0.5 O,A O.a 0 2 0 I 0 J 5 M A M J J A 5 0 H D aA CII 100 J F M A LI J J A 5 0 H D C~C"-'f5~This Month: During the month of March, 443 MWRs were issued, 342 closed, with a total of 1,442 remaining open including 686 that require an outage to complete.
0 v,


PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STATUS Preventive Maintenance (PM)is maintenance which is scheduled and performed on a routine basis to preclude costly and unplanned breakdowns of operating equipment.
C NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION The graphs below     depict WNP-2's monthly and year-to-date net electrical generation in megawatt hours as reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission per Regulatory Guide 1.16.
PM is controlled by a computerized card system which lists the PM to be performed on each piece of equipment, along with the date it is due.The graph below depicts the monthly manhours of PM work scheduled, completed, and backlogged by the WNP-2 Plant Maintenance organization.
MONTHLY NET ELECTRICAL          WNP 2 GENERATION bOO Cll CC dOO N
PBEVENTXVE MAXNTENANCE STATUS WNP 2 C/l vs o.o X~o Rs J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F'A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY 196'C HE DU LE D COMPLETED Qgg SACK LOO This Month: During the month of March, 5,620 hours of PM work were scheduled, 1,987 PM hours were completed, with a total of 6,582 remaining in backlog.-11 EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE Out of service equipment is categorized as that hardware which if removed from service would have an impact on Plant Availability or Plant Capacity Factors.The graph below depict the numbers of major pieces of hardware that were out of service during each month.I C7 4 CA C1 26 24 22 20 16 14 12 1O EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE WHP-2 Ql Cl C I 0 4 D 2 4 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY 1 9'UT OF SKRVICR This Month: Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko.4;recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs;main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch;and condensate booster pump 2C for oil pump repairs.
C O
PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management.
Vl 0
After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.
5~
TOTAL PLANT MODIFICATIONS WNP-2 C/l C)C)gg I W 1 2 O 0 0 6 0 T 0 6 0.%0+4 O.B 0 2 1 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D NKW Qgg COMPLETED J F M A M J J A S 0 N D QRI 1 98F REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS IN ENGXNEERIN G WHP 2 0 cg 200 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D HKW QPg COMPLETED J F'A M J J A S 0 N D KR 1 QS'7 REMAINING This Month: A total of 725 PMR's remain backlogged of which 401 are in Engineering.
le I
PLANT DRAWING REVISION The Plant is responsible for implementing design changes within the plant prior to drawing revision, and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.The first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision.The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.
0 J F'    A M J J A S 0 N D         J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 10bd                        CY 1sbV' a    ACTUAL              SCHEDULED CUMULATIVE NET ELECTRICAL        WNP 2 GENERATION O~VI C
TOTAL DBAWING BEVISIONS-ENGINEEBING WNP-2 ire~Do CS ZDO 0 2OO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9ST RECEIVED ling REVISED AWAITINO REVISION TOTAL DBAWIN G REVISIONS-PLANT WNP 2 t/l x C7 Vl O~~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd RECEIVED Qgg IMPLEMENTED J F M A M J J A S 0 N D IEBRI Y 19ST T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog is 5,607 drawings.
I I
PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.)The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG COMPOSITION WHP 2 2 RJ J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J~'A M J J A 2 0 H 0 gg POETIC II Qgg AIJ OTH5 TOP TIER DRAWING BACKLOG STATUS WHP 2 ALL OTHER DRAWING BACKLOG STATUS WHP 2~COO 2 RJ 2 J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0~WAIT PLAN IMk J'M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 QQ9 AVE%NS UPOATC J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 fjgg AWAIT PLAN IA, AVE%VIL3 UPOATC This flonth: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.Top Tier All Others Total Plant 470 4,855 ,325 En ineerin 0 282~82 Total 470 5,137 ,607 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs)may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency.
gx Lal J F'    A M J     J A S 0 N D       J   F M A M J   J A S 0 N D CY  1 Odd                        CY 19bT a    ACTUAL          o  SCHEDULED This Month:       The plant generated 516,206 MWH's during the month of March, continuing to operate in single loop configuration due to exces-sive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date total electrical generation is 1,487,899 MWH's and the cumulative since commercial operation is 12,257,896 MWH's.'
The first graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month.The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout of the monthly NCR's by category (i.e., administrative/hardware).
MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS WHP J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D I22lRG Qgg CL0220~VACIILDO CUMULATIVE NON-CONFORMANCE REPORTS WHP 2,~2 4 2 2 2 0 J F M A 1I J CY J A 2~0 H 0 NLTIAATDI2 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D x VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG CATEGORIES WHP 2 g ADO 200 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D gag AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC
~HNKWAPC Thi s Month: In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332.Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.
I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs)and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies.
The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.100 LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER)eNNP 2 O Of.eo 70 50 40 30 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 19115 CY 1957 o ISSUCD OC CUMULA'TIVS 1%I7 o I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~o~~o~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I CATESIY I J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0 e J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0I I f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~o~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooe~~~~~eo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e I~~~~oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~~~~oo~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e 1 I I I e I e I 1 I~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~o~~o~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~I I 2 0 0 2 2 2 I~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~I 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 I e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~eo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooe~~~~~~~~~~~PHSRJ8.E89Ht I 1 IjESIIfBINIIRIINSTAU.W I 2 EITHNL<I IjEFICIHIT l%0CHjIIHI-9 I C0598P FAIUIE<I I me-I I 3 I 1 2 2 1'I~o~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~I~~~~~o~o~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~IOIKYT0TALI 2 0 2 2 5 6 7 4 3 3 3 7 YEAR TOINTE I 2 2 I 6 11 17 2l 28 31 8 37 44 This Month: A total of zero LERs were submitted in the month of March.
0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure.For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal of 230 man-rem was establ'ished.
The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.The bottom graph depicts exposure distribution.
MONTHLY EXPOSURE YW1 2 CUMULATIVE EXPOSURE HHr-2 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 OY~SSS OY~SSY J t V A V J J A~0 H 0 OY 102$0 J t V A V J J A~0 H 0 OY KtZ CALENDAR YTD EXPOSURE DISTRIBUTION 2 2,A 2 2 2 o,s OA 0,2 0 HOHC R1R~2R 2 SR 2 AR A SR Ci2ZI vARoH 21~1 est This Month: The monthly exposure for all radiation workers at WNP-2 in March was 4.653 man-rem.  


SOLID RADWASTE Solid radwaste includes two products: (1)solidified radioactive waste which is the accumulation of radioactive products (sludge, resins, filter cake)removed by liquid and gaseous processing systems;and (2)contaminated solid materials (disposable gloves, smears, trash)generated as a result of mainten-ance activities.
UNIT AVAILABILITYFACTOR Unit Availability Factor is the ratio of the Unit Available Hours (i.e., the sum of the total clock hours during the period that the generator operated on line plus the total clock hours during the period that the unit was in reserve shutdown, that is capable of operating on line,but for some reason did not) to the total clock hours contained in the period. The result is multiplied by 100 to express the factor as a percent.
These graphs depict the monthly and cumulative cubic feet of solidified radioactive waste and dry active waste generated at WNP-2 and subsequently shipped off site.For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to limit the volume of solid radwaste shipped from the plant to 25,000 cubic feet.SOLID, RADWASTE GENERATED WHO-2 DRY ACTIVE RADWASTE GENERATED WHO 2 J 2 M A M J J A$0 H D o MOHTHLY CY 1$$$CUMULATIVC J F M A M J J A$0 H 0 CY~$27 J t M A M J J A~0 H 0 J T'A M J J A~0 H D CY 1$$$CY~$$Y o MOHTIO Y o CUMULATIVC o OLAHT COAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE SHIPPED OFF SITE WHO 2 J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 o MOHTHLY CY 1$$$~CUMULATIVC J P M A M J J A$0 H D CY~$$'F This Month: Total radioactive waste (i.e., solidified and dry active)generated during March was 720 cubic feet.  
Unit Availabilit Factor  = (Unit Available Hours)(100)
Tota    C oc  Hours  s  n Per)o The graph below  depicts the monthly Unit Availability Factor for      WNP-2 as it relates to the 1985  industry average for BWRs.
U NIT AVAILABILITY  WNP 2 FACTO B 1 20%
110%
1 O0%
g    &O%
J M A M J     J A 0 N D     J   F M A M J       J A S 0 H     D CY 1QSd                      CY 1 987 a    ACTUAL            198d IHD  AVO This Month:     Unit availability for the month of March    was 92.29%. The year-to-date unit availability is 91.43'X    and the cumulative since commercial operation  is  77.12%.


LIQUID RADWASTE Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the production of radioactive liquid waste.Processing systems are operated to minimize the radioactive content of these liquids.The following graph depicts, the gallons of liquid discharged (without dilution)to the river from WNP-2, and also the liquid effluent whole body dose.VOLUME OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE
UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR Unit Capacity Factor is the ratio of the net electrical energy generated during a given period of time to the maximum dependable capacity (MDC), times the total number of clock hours during the period.
'%PASTE WNP-2 4 C gl O r J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19db o CURRENT MONTH J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1957 x CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENT%HOLE BODY DOSE WNP-2 MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3 0 020 0 010 0 000 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd o WHOLE BODY DOSE J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19dT x CUMULATIVE FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure.MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01)microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.1 SE 04 1 7E-04 1 eE-04 1 5E-04 1 4E-04 1 e3E-04 1 2E 04 1'.1 E-04 1 OE 04 9 OE-05 S OE-05 7 OE-05 S.OE-05 5 OE-05 4iOK 05 3.0 E-05 2 OE-05 1 OE-05 0 OK&00 FUEL RELIABILITY (I-1 3 1)MICROCURIES PER CRAM tll0 C a a E J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be CY 19S7 a MONTHLY AVERAOE This Month: Present monthly readings are greater than 3 decades below the Technical Specification limit.-21 PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination.
              - Unit        acit Factor      Net Electrical  Ener    Generated x 100 i  e              Ca                =
This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems.Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas.The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month.This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.SQUARE FEET OF CONTAMINATED AREA WNR 40 tai n 30 4 c CS g~~20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1066 CY 196T SOU ARK FRET PERSONNEL CONTAMINATI ONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant.Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.
Maximum Dependable  Capacity x Period Hours The first graph       below depicts the monthly capacity factor as      it relates to the 1985  industry averages for BWRs. The second graph depicts the cumulative capacity factor from commercial"operation through the current month.
C/l K C)la Cl 26 26 24 22 20 16 14 12 10 6 PERSONNEL SKIN CONTAMINATIONS WHP-2 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F'A M JJ A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 198T CUAHTITY This Month: There were five personnel skin contaminations during the month of March.
UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR 1 2C%
1 1 O%
1 00%
BC'C%
b~
bO%
P      sow J   F   M A M   J J A S 0 N D       J F M A M J     J A S 0 N     D CY 1Sbe                            10bT a    ACTUAL        o  10bb INDCYAVO CUMULATIVE                 UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%
J   F M A M J       J A .S 0 N D     J F M A M J J     A S 0 N D CY 1 9b&#xc3; CUMULATIVE CAP FAC This Month:           Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.
0 H
I
  'I


WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper.The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen.The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.*CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I aAoo O.OOO J C M A M J J A 0 0 H D o ouoealv'I o4ne J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 sA" oui~TO DISSOLVED OXYGEN WHO C~,OOO aooo aooo acoo COPPER Cu wHP 2 J&#xc3;M A M J J A O CY~Coo 0 CuoiiCHT MOME~wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO o Ou CAY'OW aooo g aAoo O.COO O COO O~OO O OOO 0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A~0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 DcolSH$%ciA PLANT STAFFING The graph below depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.PLANT STAFF P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I 480 420 410 400 580 5TO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 10bd a ON BOARD J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 198T AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month: Budgeted staff for FY 87 is 467, the actual for March was 464.
UNIT EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITYFACTOR The  Equivalent Availability Factor is the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the    energy  that  can be produced  if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period              if operated continuously at      a maximum  capacity. Discretionary operations below maximum permitted power for economic        reasons  such  as reserve shutdowns do not reduce equivalent availability.
PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below reflect the monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff.This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring.The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.PLANT P EBSONNEL TUBNOVEB WNP-2 50 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb CY 1 QbV O CUMULATIVE CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSO NNEL TUBNOVEB WNP 2 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0 MOR OPNS MAINT TECH ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81~1 QbT This Month: During March the plant experienced a turnover of three employees.
Gross          Available    Equi valent Unit    Equi valent Seasonal Maximum        Hours      - Derated  Hours    - Derated  Hours Capacity EAF =                                                                              x 100%
0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.HO URS 0 F PLANT OVERTIME WNP 2 1 30 1 20 1 10 90 gg bO CCI CD g TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 RKOULAR HOURS CY 19bV OVKRTlMK HOURS PLANT OVERTIME IN PERCENT WNR 2 I CD I laJ 40 3O 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be o ACTUAL W J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9b7 AU TH 0 Rl ZK 0 This Month: A total of 6.72%overtime was worked by the plant staff in March.  
Gross Maximum Capacity      x  en  od Hours The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Equivalent Availability            Factor of MNP-2 as     it relates to the plant's FY 87 goal of 7(5. Per INPO,         the 1985 industry average was 63.8'X.
EQUIVALENT UNIT E                              AVAILABILITYFACT OR WHP 2
      '1 1C%
1  OC%
QC%
g SC%
7C%
SC%
SC%
Pg    4C%
I 5      SC%
2C%
J F   M A M J J A S 0 H D             J F   M A M J J A S     0 N D CY 1 Odd                          CY 1N7 a    CURRENT MOHTH                o    WHP 2 COAL This Month:         The  unit equivalent availability factor for March was 66.74K, operating in single loop configuration due to excessive vibra-tion of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date equivalent availability factor is 64.6% and the cumulative since commercial operation    is  59.49%.


PLANT PROCEDURE DEVIATIONS A procedural deviation is an~aroved modification to a procedure which does not change or compromise its intent.Approved deviations occur (1)when the plant has undergone modification and the original procedure must be updated to reflect the change, (2)when procedures are being used for the first time during initial equipment and process startup,'and (3)when the plant systems are in a testing mode and require temporary procedure modifications to complete the tests.The graph below depicts all safety-related, approved plant procedure deviations by month.280 PLANT PROCEDVRE DEVIATIONS WNP-2 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J~F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1M5 CY 1$bV CURRENT MONTH This Month: During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.
PLANT THERl1AL EFFICIENCY The graphs below            depict the monthly and cumulative heat rate (BTUs/Kwhr) since commercial operation.              The third graph presents the plant's thermal efficiency expressed as a percent of the calculated design performance.
NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total.The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to each violation.
For  FY    87, WNP-2's goal is to maintain an overall                              plant thermal efficiency that will      be better than 96% of the design thermal                              efficiency.
The FY 87 goal for WNP-2 is zero violations of Levels I, II or III severity.NRC VIOLATIONS V/N P-2 52 I Cl 60 TO 60 40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1955 CY 198T o WEIOHTEO CUM o CUMULATIVE a MONTHLY~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~a~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I N6 I 1%7 I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~ea~~~~~~~~aeeee~a~e~e~~~ae~~~~~~~~~e~e~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~eae~~~~~~~~~~~~~ea~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I SEVERITY I J F N A II J J A S 0 H DI J F II A II J J A S 0 H D I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~aI~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I LEVEL I I I LEVEL 11 I I LEVEL lll I I LEVEL IY I 11 4 5 1 I I I lEltEL Y I 1 1-2~~~~a~~~~\~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I TOTAL)0 0 0 1 0 0$0 12 4 5 110 0 0 I TMTODATEI 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 4 16202526)0 0 0 I I IGEHIED YEA)ITODATE I 0 0 0 I 1 1 10 10 44 56 67 70 I 0 0 0 I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I LEVEL I I20)616HIFICAHT VIRATIQ8 IHVQ.VI%ACIlNL QI POTEHTIAL I)PACT OH TK POSLIC SESQ.TI%IH PEIILTIES.
PLANT TIIERMAL      WHA>>2 PERFORMANCE                                          PLANT THERMAL        WHd<<2 PERFORMANCE
I LEVEL 11 I16)S16HIFICAHT VIRATIQ8 I)IVQ.V1%ACTUAL I PIEHTIN.INCT I IK PIRIC RESILTI%IH PNLTIES.I I LEVEL Ill I10)VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NE CNSE RI SISHIFICNIT GKESIL I LEVEL IY I 5)LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81 Iff NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN'IEVEL V I I)VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A IIIII SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfAL GKEK I~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~a~~a~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I This Month: For the month of March, there were zero violations issued against WNP-2 by the NRC.
                                                                          ~ 0.$ $
STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET), and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.
                                                                          ~ 0. $ A 22                                                                        ~ 0 $$
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING WHP 2 J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D gZPCJNWTI C MAINTENANCE-GET-OTHER TRAINING WHP 2 J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D~8Z Rt0 LICENSED&NON-LICENSED TRAINING WHP 2 J P M A M'J J A 2 0 H 0 J 1 M A M J J*2 0 H D OCT Qg OTHCO gus CIYYCN'AO HOH-aMCHQK SIMULATOR TRAINING WHP 2 J P M A M J J A$0 H D J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D CY I PS~OIMULAT02 TPAIHIHO CY SPOT This Month: For the month of March, a total of 8,716.25 student hours of training were provided for Supply System and contractor personnel.  
20                                                                       ~ Ck. $ 2
                                                                                                          ~ ddd MDUSTIIY AVCSAOC ld                                                                        TO.$ l
~ 4 ~                                                                      ~ 0.$
SIN    Y SYSTCM YYSY COAL
~ 0                                                                      ~ 0 2Y ld 2$
ld 2A 2                                                                      ld 2$
                                                                          ~ 0 22 J 2 V A V J J A S 0 H 0         J T V A V J J A S 0 H      D                  J F II A V J J A S 0 H 0         J 2 V A M J J
* S 0 H D CY ~ 444 CUSIICHT MOHTH                                                  0 CUMGL O'Ad                SIDUSTdf AVVIIAOC PLANT THERMAL      WHA 2 EFFICIENCY F 20
                                ~ IO IIY ~ T T4ASLT 40AL 20
                                  ~ 0 J Y M A J'J   A S 0 H 0    J 2 V A         M  J J A S 0 H 0 CY  ~ ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month:              The  cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.
FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity. Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages. The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate. For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours of unscheduled (forced) outage per calendar quarter.
Forced Outa e Hours Force  utage ours + ours enerator    n  one HOUBS OF FORCED          WHP 2 OUTAGE TIME TOO Q    800 Cl A.OO Ch 8OO 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL F M A M J   J A S 0 N    D   J F M   A M J J A 0 N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE  WNP 2 BATE 1 DC' EK lal CP 0
Ch O
J F M A M J J A S      0 H D     J F M A M J J   A 0 N D CY 1986                      CY 1 98T QQg  CURRENT MONTH 4
5 This Month:     During the month of March, there were 57.33 forced outage hours for a forced outage rate of 8%.


CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the total number of classroom (instructor) hours scheduled and the total number of classroom (instructor) hours actually provided for Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET)and other, Licensed, Non-Licensed, and Simulator training.TOTAL CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING CLASSIIOOI4 (IHSTIIVCTOII)
UNPLANNED SCRAMS An  unplanned scram  is defined  as the actuation of the reactor protection system that results  in  a scram  signal any time the reactor is critical. The signal may be automatically initiated as the result of exceeding a setpoint or manually initiated by the control room operator depressing the scram button.
HOIPIS~A~2 I 2~~0 d O,A 0 2 02 0~0 J 2 M A M J J A S 0 44 0 KI4CDVLSD MAINTENANCE-GET
The graph below  depicts the number of unplanned scrams, both manual and automatic, that occurred while the reactor was critical and required the initiation of a Licensee Event Report. Scrams that are planned as part of special evolutions or tests are not included in this indicator.
-OTHER TRAINING cLA$$$0044 (IHsTsvclos)
For FY 87, the MNP-2 goal is to not exceed three unplanned scrams during the fiscal  year. Per INPO, the 1986 industry average was 3.9 scrams per unit.
Nouds J T I4 A M J J A~0 H 0 gag%4FZ LICENSED 8c NON-LICENSED TRAINING cLA$$$00LI (INsTsvcTCII)
UNPLANNED      WNP 2 SCBAMS 10 J F M A   M J J A S   O N D     J F M A M J   J A S O N 0 Qdd                          CY 1sd7
Hovlls 0~0 A 500~M A M J J A 2 O II O~iENSDVLSD J T'A I4 J J A S 0 H D gyp%49 J 2 M A M J J A S 0 H D J 2 44 A M J J A S 0 H D REI4cDVLSD
                        %26 MANUAL            Qg3g  AUTO MAYIC This Month:     During the month of March, there was one unplanned manual scram.
~WclVAV SIMULATOR TRAINING cLA$$$00M ($4$TSvcTDS)HCVIIs MJJASOHO~QNSDVL20 J 2 M A I4 J J A S 0 H 0 gag 9XATAi~This Month: A total of 790 classroom (instructor) hours were scheduled for the month of March, and a total of 1,020.25 classroom (instructor) hours were actually provided.-31
'4'l~
NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.NRC EXAMINATION (RO)WHP 2 10 I lal B Cl$$77 65 22 1 1 1 1 0 0 OOO JUL$5 OCT$5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$6 FEB$6AUC$6 EXAMINED PASSED gggg F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION (SR 0)WNP-2 26 20 1Q 1Q 10 4 45 1 44~5 0 JUL$5 OCT$5 MAR$4HOV$4 DKC64 MAY$5 JAH66 FKB$6AUC$6 EXAMINED Qgg PASSED@gag F'AILED NOTE: The following exams July, 1983 October, 1983 March, 1984 November, 1984 December, 1984 May, 1985 January, 1986 February, 1986 August, 1986 have been gi ven: Cold License Exams-Phase I Cold License Exams-Phase II Retakes Mot License Exams Requalification Exams Retakes Requalification Exams Mot License Exams (1 Retake)Mot License Exams
~0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA)audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.~QA AUDIT DEFICIENCIES WNP 2 40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D'F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd IDENTIFIED CLOSED Qggg REMA ININO C QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA)Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.
This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.QA SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES WNP 2 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I M A'M J J A S 0 N D J F'A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19SS IDENTII IED QQg CLOSED g3Pg REMA INI NO
'3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review of industry operating experiences pertinent to WNP-2 is accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG).This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry.The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis.The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.
MONTHLY OER PROGRAM STATUS WHP 2 2,~2,4 2 2 2 g~8 CUMULATIVE OER P RO GRAM STATUS WHP 2 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A~0 H 0 ASSIOrR~CI.OSCD~SACICIOO 0 S OA 0 2 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J*S 0 H 0 CY Isis CT~SSF AssIDCCD x CLOSCD P WCX4DO OER PROGRAM BACKLOG WHP 2 200 Q 200 J F M*M J J A 2 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D AWAITIHO 2&IRA Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month: In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245.The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.
SER/SOER STATUS The graphs below are a break out of the Significant Event Report (SER)and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER)status on a monthly and cumulative basis.SIGNIFICANT EVENT REPORTS MOHTHLY SIGNIFICANT EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC
~SO~20~10 1OO~0 SO TO 4O SO 20 20 10 0 J 2 M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J P'A M J J A S 0 H 0 gg ASSIOHCOCY gag CLOS20'g Q~ASOCSSS 200 J 2 M A M J J A I TOTAL ASS IOHCO\S 0 H 0 J S M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 x TOTAL CLOSC0 CY ISST v SACK400 SIGNIFICANT OPERATING EVENT REPORTS M OII THLY 20 20 28 24 22 20~0\~IA~2~0 0 4 2 0 J S IJ A M J J A S O H 0 J S M A M J J A S 0 H 0 gg ASSIOH20 gZ CLOS20 9g'WASOCCSS SIGNIFICANT OPERATING EVENT REPORTS'UMU LAY IV 2 TO I 20 J 2 M A M J J*S 0 H 0 J P'A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 o tOTAl ASS OH CO CY~SSS x TOTAL CLOSC0 CY ASST v SACKLOO This Month: For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged.
Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.
EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety.The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators:
(1)the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2)the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and a lost time accident rate of 0.7.RECORDABLE INJURIES AT THE PLANT WHF 2 RECORDABLE INJURY INCIDENT RATE 2~2 Oo~2 OO'1~OO 1O Oo~Oo 1I12 l(SADLY SOAL 1 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M*M J J A S 0 H 0 CY 1SSY SCCOSDAKC MJVSCS J OO 2 Oo X,oo~OO aoo J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 0 wN 2 tiheSHY sAYS J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY~SSF e OOA1 LOST TIME ACCIDENTS WHF 2 2 OO ISO 2 Oo LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE 2 0 0 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 122~CY 12SF aoo 0 Jo O.20 aoo J F M A M J J A S 0 H D 0 wN<<S IKceelY sAYs J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 12SF e Ookl This Month: During the month of March there was one recordable injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.
C~~b SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT Support for outage and nonroutine mai ntenance activities are being provided by a site support contract.The graphs below depict the monthly contracted manpower, the regular hours versus overtime hours worked by contracted employees per month, the number of tasks bei ng worked on per month, and the cumulative personnel exposure.SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT MANPOWER WHP 2 220 2OO 2OO 200 220 2OO~OO~OO~AO~2O 1 OO OO~0 JO 2O 0 J P M A M J J A~0 H D J P M*M J J A 2 0 H D CY IOOO CY I OCT SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT HOURS WORKED WHP 2 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D M OVAL~~OY22TISZ 4NL SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT TASKS WHP 2 SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT EXPOSURE~2CHTCI UOC YTD AT WHP 2 J P M A V J J A 2 0 H 0 J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 Qgjg 2TAAT20~COMBED QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J P V A M J J A 2 0 H D CY~042 CY IPST CX P0OU II 2 This Month: In March the contractor headcount was 98.
h I I~I 1 t P SECURITY Security compensatory time is required to provide escort service inside vital areas and guard coverage for failed security equipment.
The first graph depicts the number of hours that security officers were assigned to compensate for failed security access equipment and to escort non-cleared maintenance and outside service personnel inside vital areas.The second graph depicts the number of Supply System employees and all other personnel (i.e., contractor, BPA, and NRC)that have been screened and granted unescorted access to WNP-2.SECURITY COMPENSATORY HOURS WNP-2 2 6 4 2 2 1 b 1 6 1 4 1 2 0 6 0+6 0 4 0 2 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19b7 TOTAL COM PENS HOURS UNESCORTED ACCESS AUTHORIZATIONS WNP 2 1 b 1+7 1 6 1~6 1 4 O 1 g 1 2 OC~I~1<<n 09 0 b O~g~0 7 0 6 O.d 0 4 O.d 0 2 0.1 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 SUPPLY SYSTEM J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 967 ALL OTHERS This Month: A total of 705.7 hours were expended in March by the Security organization in compensatory support.Unescorted access to WNP-2 for Supply System personnel during March was 1,170 and for all others was 213.  


SPARE PARTS The graphs below depict the line items of operational spare parts identified to be carried in inventory for MNP-2 and line items currently available in inventory.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS An Unplanned Safety System Actuation is defined as an    event or condition that results in an unplanned manual or automatic actuation    of an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF). The two major ESF systems included in      this indicator are the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) and the Emergency      AC  Power system.
It is estimated that 25,000 line items will eventually be carried in the MNP-2 spare parts inventory.
ECCS  actuations are the result of reaching a setpoint which activates one of the following systems: automatic depressurization system, high pressure core spray, low pressure coolant injection and low pressure core spray systems.
30 2d 26 24 22 20 v7 18 r c 16 L n o3 14 I~~12 10 8 SPARE PARTS XDENTXFXCATXON WNP-2 J F'A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 198T 0 TARO ET o IDENTIFIED o REMAIN FOR IDENT 30 2d SPARE PARTS ON HAND WNP-2 24 20~n 18~o 16 Vl 12 10 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 o IDENTIFIED J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 198T o ON HAND C}}
Emergency AC power actuations are a result of loss of a safeguards bus.
The graph below  depicts the number of unplanned actuations of the        ECCS and Emergency  AC  Power Systems  only.
The FY 87 goal  for MNP-2  is to not exceed one unplanned    ECCS  challenge per quarter.
UNPLANNED SAFETY                  WNP SYSTEM ACTVATIONS I
I Cl J  F M A M J    J A S 0 N    D    J F'    A    M  J  J A S O N    D CY  '0 ECCS 96T AC POWER        QQg CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This  first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours. The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason.      This includes instruments on control room back panels.
CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED                  WNP 2 ANNUNCIATORS 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 C) 1 10 I      100 c3 eo 7'0 Cl      60 lal 60            I 40            0 60            C 20 10            IL' 0
F  M A M J      J A S 0 N  D    J  F M  A M J      J A S 0 N D CY 19bb              MONTH CY 19'URRENT CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S                  WNP 2 OUT OF SERVICE 24 20 16 16 14 Q
12              III Cl 10 Q                      I 5        6 6            0 C
ll K
J  F  M  A M J      J  A S 0 N D      J F M A M J J        A S 0 N D CY  1966                      CY 1 96T OUT OF SERVICE
 
MAINTENANCE WORK RE(VEST STATUS The Maintenance Work Request (MWR) is                      the document control used to    initiate and record maintenance activities and                      plant modifications performed by the Plant Maintenance staff at the plant site. The monthly status of the WNP-2 MWRs (i.e., those issued, closed, and remaining open at month's end) is graphically displayed below. Also depicted is a breakout of MWRs requiring outage conditions to complete.                  Preventive maintenance items are not included as a part of MWRs.
MAINTENANCE WORK REQUEST STATUS
              ~  ,~
              ~  ,5
              ~  ,4
              ~  2
              ~  2 I  ~
Ij 05 04 05 02 0 I 0
J J A 5 0 H 0
            ~
J F  M A M gag 125IscP        ~
J J A 5 0 H        D cs.Deco J P  M A M gag X%+5<<HO OUTAGE          8c  NONOUTAGE    WHP 2 MWR BACKLOG
              ~  .5
              ~ 5
              ~  A
              ~  2 OA 02 02 0    1 0
J P  M A M    J J A 5 0 H 0            J II'    A M J  J A 5 0 H  D
                                      ~ 5~
0  5ACICLQ                OUTA  OC          e  OT4ovfAo2 CLASS-I MWR'SWHPIN2 THE BACKLOG
                ~,5
                ~,5 IA I    2
                ~  2 0.5 O,A O.a 02 0 I 0
J 5  M A M    J J A 5 0 H D            J F    M A LI  J J A 5 0 H  D aA CII100                C~C" -'f5~
This Month:        During the month of March, 443 MWRs were issued, 342 closed, with    a total of 1,442 remaining open including 686 that require an outage to complete.
 
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STATUS Preventive Maintenance (PM) is maintenance which is scheduled and performed on a  routine basis to preclude costly and unplanned breakdowns of operating equipment. PM is controlled by a computerized card system which lists the PM to be performed on each piece of equipment, along with the date        it  is due.
The graph below depicts the monthly manhours of PM work scheduled, completed, and backlogged by the WNP-2 Plant Maintenance organization.
PBEVENTXVE MAXNTENANCE      WNP 2 STATUS C/l vs
: o. o X
  ~  o Rs J  F M A M J J A S      0  N D    J F'  A M J      J A S O N D CY 1966                      CY HE DU LE D              COMPLETED        196'C Qgg SACK LOO This Month:      During the month of March, 5,620 hours of PM work were scheduled, 1,987 PM hours were completed, with a total of 6,582 remaining in backlog.
                                        - 11
 
EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE Out of service equipment is categorized as that hardware which    if  removed from service would have an impact on Plant Availability or Plant Capacity Factors.
The graph below  depict the numbers of major pieces of hardware that were out of service during each month.
EQUIPMENT OUT          WHP 2 OF SERVICE 26 24 22 20 I
16 C7    14 4      12            Ql CA                  Cl 1O C
I C1 0
D 4
2  4          2 J F M A M J J A S O N D              J F M A M J    J A S  O  N D CY 1966                      CY 1 OF SKRVICR      9'UT This Month:    Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko. 4; recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs; main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch; and condensate booster pump 2C  for oil  pump  repairs.
PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management. After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.
The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's          written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.
TOTAL PLANTWNP            MODIFICATIONS 2
1 2 C/l C)
C)
O 0 06 0T gg I W
0 6 0.%
0+4 O.B 02 1
0 J  F M A    M  J  J A S  0 N D    J  F M A M J      J  A S 0 N    D 1 98F NKW        Qgg COMPLETED              QRI    REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS              WHP 2 IN ENGXNEERIN G 0    200 cg J F M A M J        J A S  0  N D    J  F'  A M J      J  A S 0 N D QS'7 HKW      QPg  COMPLETED            KR  1 REMAINING This Month:      A total of  725 PMR's remain backlogged  of which    401 are in Engineering.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION The    Plant is responsible  for  implementing design changes within the plant prior to    drawing revision,  and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.
The    first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision. The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.
TOTAL DBAWING BEVISIONS                              ENGINEEBING WNP 2 ire
          ~Do CS ZDO 0
2OO J F M A M    J J A S 0      N D    J  F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9ST RECEIVED          ling  REVISED              AWAITINO REVISION TOTAL DBAWING WNP              REVISIONS            PLANT 2
t/l x
C7 Vl O ~
~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D            J  F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd                        Y 19ST RECEIVED          Qgg  IMPLEMENTED            IEBRI T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month:        For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog  is 5,607 drawings.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below      depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and      a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.
(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.) The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.
DRAWING REVISION WHP        BACKLOG        COMPOSITION 2
2 RJ J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0      J ~'    A M J J A 2  0  H 0 gg  POETIC II      Qgg AIJ OTH5 TOP TIER DRAWING            BACKLOG STATUS                      ALL OTHER DRAWING          WHP 2 BACKLOG STATUS WHP 2 2
~ COO RJ 2
J  P M A M  J J A 2 0 H 0    J'  M A M J  J A 2 0 H 0              J 2 M  A M J  J A 2 0 H 0
        ~WAIT  PLAN IMk            QQ9 AVE%  NS UPOATC                fjgg  AWAIT PLAN  IA,              AVE% VIL3 UPOATC This flonth:      For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.
Plant                  En ineerin              Total Top  Tier                    470                        0                470 All Others                4,855                      282                5,137 Total                        ,325                  ~82                    ,607 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs) may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency. The                        first  graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month. The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout                      of the monthly NCR's by category              (i.e.,    administrative/hardware).
MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE          WHP REPORTS J F  M A M I22lRG J J A 2 0 H D Qgg CL0220 J F M
                                                              ~A M J J A 2 VACIILDO 0  H D CUMULATIVE NON CONFORMANCE        WHP REPORTS 2, ~
2 4 2 2 2
0 J F  M A 1I  J J A 2 0 H  ~    0    J F M A M  J J A 2 0  H D CY NLTIAATDI2            x  VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG          WHP 2 CATEGORIES ADO g
200 J F  M A M gag J J A 2 0 H D AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC            ~  HNKWAPC Thi s Month:      In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332. Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.
I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs) and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies. The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER) eNNP          2 100 70 50 O
Of.
eo 40 30 20 10 J        F      M        A        M        J        J        A      S        0        N        D                  J        F      M        A        M        J        J        A        S        0        N        0 CY 19115                                                                    CY      1957 o            ISSUCD                                            OC            CUMULA'TIVS 1%I7 o                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~~ I CATESIY              I    J      F        N      A        N    J      J        A        S      0      N        0    e    J      F        N      A        N      J        J        A      S      0        N      0I I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      e f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o    ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    eo  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~  I ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~      ~~  oo ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  e PHSRJ8. E89Ht I                            1                        1      1    2      3        1        1      2                          1                                                                                              I IjESIIfBINIIRIINSTAU.WI                                                  2                              1      1        2      1                2 I
EITHNL< I                                                                    1 e
IjEFICIHIT l%0CHjIIHI-9 I                                                    1        1              1                                              I e
C0598P FAIUIE< I                                                                                                                              I I                                          me-I            I                                      3    I        1      2                        2        1    I    1
'I  ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~    ~~~    I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~o  ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~  I IOIKYT0TALI 2                              0        2      2        5    6      7        4      3        3      3        7 I 2              0      0 YEAR      TOINTE I              2      2        I      6      11    17      2l      28      31      8      37      44          2      2        2 I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      I e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~      ~~  I~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e  ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This Month:                                        A      total of zero                                  LERs were                          submitted in the month of March.
0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System        is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure.              For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal  of    230 man-rem    was    establ'ished.        The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.
The bottom graph      depicts exposure distribution.
MONTHLY        EXPOSURE                                              CUMULATIVE    HHr-2 EXPOSURE YW1 2 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0    J  t  V A V J J A 0 0 H 0                J t V A V J  J A ~ 0 H 0  J t V A V J J A ~ 0 H 0 OY ~ SSS                  OY ~ SSY                                    OY 102$
0 OY KtZ CALENDAR YTD EXPOSURE              2 DISTRIBUTION 2,A 2 2 2
o,s OA 0,2 0
HOHC    R1R    ~ 2R    2 SR  2 AR  A SR Ci2ZI vARoH 21 ~ 1 est This Month:        The monthly exposure for                all radiation    workers at    WNP-2  in March was 4.653 man-rem.
 
SOLID RADWASTE Solid radwaste includes two products: (1) solidified radioactive waste which is the accumulation of radioactive products (sludge, resins, filter cake) removed by liquid and gaseous processing systems; and (2) contaminated solid materials (disposable gloves, smears, trash) generated as a result of mainten-ance activities. These graphs depict the monthly and cumulative cubic feet of solidified radioactive waste and dry active waste generated at WNP-2 and subsequently      shipped    off site.
For FY 87, WNP-2's          goal is to limit the            volume      of solid radwaste shipped from the plant to 25,000 cubic feet.
SOLID, RADWASTE              GENERATED                                DRY ACTIVE RADWASTE                      GENERATED WHO-2                                                                          WHO 2 J 2 M A M J J A    $ 0 H  D    J F M A M    J J A $ 0 H 0              J  t    M A M  J J A ~ 0 H 0 CY 1$ $ o$
J T'  A M J J A ~ 0 H D CY ~ $ $ YOLAHT COAL CY 1$ $ $                  CY ~ $ 27                        o    MOHTIO Y                CUMULATIVC        o o  MOHTHLY            CUMULATIVC RADIOACTIVE WASTE              WHO 2 SHIPPED OFF SITE J 2  M A M    J J A    2 0 H 0    J P M A M      J  J A $  0  H D CY 1$ $ ~$                  CY ~ $ $ 'F o    MOHTHLY              CUMULATIVC This Month:          Total radioactive waste (i.e., solidified and dry active) generated during March was 720 cubic feet.
 
LIQUID RADWASTE Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the production of radioactive liquid waste. Processing systems are operated to minimize the radioactive content of these liquids. The following graph depicts, the gallons of liquid discharged (without dilution) to the river from WNP-2, and also the liquid effluent    whole body dose.
VOLUME OF LIQUID                RADIOACTIVE '%PASTE WNP 2 4 C gl O r
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D          J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19db                      CY 1957 o  CURRENT MONTH            x    CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENTWNP%HOLE      2 BODY DOSE MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3
0 020 0 010 0 000 J F  M  A M J J A S 0 N D        J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19bd                      CY 19dT o  WHOLE BODY DOSE                x CUMULATIVE FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure. MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01 ) microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.
FUEL RELIABILITY                (I1 3 1 )
MICROCURIES PER CRAM 1  SE 04 1  7E 04 1  eE 04 1  5E 04 1  4E 04 1 e3E 04 1  2E 04 1'. 1 E 04 1 OE 04 9 OE 05 S OE 05            tll 7 OE 05 S.OE-05 5 OE 05            0 4iOK 05              C 3.0 E 05            a a
2 OE 05            E 1 OE    05 0 OK&00 J F  M  A M J J A S      0  N D    J F  M  A M J  J  A S  0  N  D CY 19be                      CY 19S7 a    MONTHLY AVERAOE This Month:      Present monthly readings are greater than  3 decades  below the Technical Specification limit.
                                          - 21
 
PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination. This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems. Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas. The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month. This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.
SQUARE FEET OF WNR              CONTAMINATED AREA 40 tai n  30 4 cCS g~~  20 10 J F M A  M  J J A S    0  H 0    J  F M A M J  J  A S  0 N  0 CY 1066                      CY 196T SOU ARK FRET PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant. Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.
PERSONNEL SKIN                  CONTAMINATIONS WHP 2 26 26 C/l 24 22 20 K
16 C) 14 la Cl    12 10 6
0 J F  M  A M J J A S      0 H D    J  F'  A M JJ  A S 0 N D CY 1966                      CY 198T CUAHTITY This Month:    There were five  personnel skin contaminations during the month of March.
 
WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper. The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen. The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.
CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I  aAoo O.OOO J  C  M A M  J J A 0 0 H  D    J C  M A M    J J A  O  0 H 0 o  ouoealv'I o4ne              sA"  oui~
DISSOLVED  WHO C OXYGEN                                                        COPPER wHP 2 Cu
                                                                          ~,OOO aooo aooo TO                                                                      acoo aooo aAoo g
O.COO O COO O ~ OO O OOO J &#xc3; M A M J J A    O 0  H  0    J C M A M J J A O 0 H D                  J  C  M A M  J J A ~ 0 H 0  J  C  M A M J J A O 0 H 0 0  CuoiiCHT MOMECY ~ Coo          ~ wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO                  o    Ou CAY'OW                w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g
J  C  M A M  J J A  O 0 H D    J C M A    M J  J A  O 0  H 0 DcolSH  $%ciA PLANT STAFFING The graph below  depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.
PLANT STAFF              P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I  480 420 410 400 580 5TO J  F M  A M J J A S 0 N        D    J  F M A M J        J A S  0 N  D 10bd CY ON                          CY 198T a      BOARD              AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month:    Budgeted  staff for FY 87  is 467, the actual    for March was 464.
PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below  reflect the  monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff. This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring. The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.
PLANT P EBSONNEL        WNP 2 TUBNOVEB 50 20 10 J  F  M  A M J J A S      0  N D        J  F M A M J J    A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb                          CY 1 QbV O    CUMULATIVE                    CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSOWNP          NNEL2 TUBNOVEB 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0
MOR    OPNS    MAINT      TECH    ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81  ~ 1 QbT This Month:    During March the plant experienced      a  turnover of three employees.
0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below          display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel      (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.
HO URS 0 F PLANT      WNP 2 OVERTIME 1 30 1 20 1  10 90 gg CCI bO CD g    TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0
J  F M A M J J A S      0  N D    J  F  M  A M J J A S    0 N  D CY 1986                        CY 19bV RKOULAR HOURS                    OVKRTlMK HOURS PLANT OVERTIME          WNR 2 IN PERCENT 40 I
3O CD I
20 laJ 10 J  F  M  A M J J A S      0  N D    J  F  M    A M J  J A S 0 N      D CY 19be                      CY 1 9b7 o    ACTUAL W              AU TH 0 Rl ZK0 This Month:            A total of  6.72% overtime was worked by the    plant staff in March.
 
PLANT PROCEDURE DEVIATIONS A procedural  deviation is  an ~aroved modification to a procedure which does not change or compromise its intent. Approved deviations occur (1) when the plant has undergone modification and the original procedure must be updated to reflect the change, (2) when procedures are being used for the first time during initial equipment and process startup,'and (3) when the plant systems are in a testing mode and require temporary procedure modifications to complete the tests. The graph below depicts all safety-related, approved plant procedure deviations by month.
PLANT PROCEDVRE        WNP 2 DEVIATIONS 280 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J  F M A M J J A S 0 N 0          J F
                                                ~  M A M J  J  A S 0  N 0 CY 1M5      CURRENT MONTH CY 1$ bV This Month:      During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.
NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below                                        depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total. The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to        each              violation.                            The FY 87 goal                                        for          WNP-2                is        zero violations of Levels                                                                    I, II or        III severity.
NRC VIOLATIONS                        V/NP 2 60 TO 52 60 I
Cl 40 20 10 J        F        M        A M J J A S                                              0        N 0                        J          F        M        A M J                        J        A S                0        N        D CY 1955                                                                                              CY 198T o            WEIOHTEO CUM                                                                              o            CUMULATIVE                                                                    a            MONTHLY
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~~
I                                                      N6                                                I                                                      1%7                                                I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~~    I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea  ~~~~~~~~          aeeee    ~ a ~ e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e      ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~        ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    I SEVERITY                              I    J        F      N        A      II        J        J      A        S      0        H      DI        J      F        II      A      II        J        J        A      S      0        H      D    I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~  I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ aI ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~  I I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              I LEVEL            I  I LEVEL          11 I I                                    LEVEL        lll I                                                                                                              I LEVEL          IY I                                                                            11        4      5      1 I                                                                                                            I I                                    lEltEL            Y I                                1                                          1              -2
    ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~~a    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ I~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                        ~  ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~ I I
TOTAL) 0                    0        0      1      0          0      $        0      12        4      5        110                0      0 I                              TMTODATEI 0                                0        0      1        1        1      4        4      16202526)0                                    0      0                                                                                  I I          IGEHIED YEA)ITODATE I 0 0 0                                                    I 1                1      10      10      44      56      67    70 I          0        0      0                                                                                  I I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~          ~  ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~
I LEVEL            I    I20)        616HIFICAHT LEVEL 11 I16) S16HIFICAHT VIRATIQ8 I)IVQ.V1% ACTUAL LEVEL        Ill      I10) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NE CNSE RI SISHIFICNIT GKESIL I
VIRATIQ8 IHVQ.VI% ACIlNL QI POTEHTIAL I)PACT OH TK POSLIC SESQ.TI% IH PEIILTIES.
PIEHTIN. INCT                      I      IK PIRIC RESILTI% IH PNLTIES.
I I
I LEVEL IY I 5) LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81                                                      Iff      NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN' IEVEL V I I) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A                                                        IIIII        SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfALGKEK I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~  I This Month:                                          For the month                                    of March, there                                        were zero                            violations issued against                    WNP-2 by                        the          NRC.
STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below    depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET),
and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.
TOTAL HOURS OFWHP              STUDENT          TRAINING 2
J J A 2 0 H                        J A 2 0 H D J P  M A M gZPCJNWTI      C D
                                                                ~
J P M A M J 8Z  Rt0 MAINTENANCE-GET-OTHER                  TRAINING                      LICENSED & NON          LICENSED TRAINING WHP 2 WHP 2 J P M A M'J J A 2 0 H 0    J 1  M A M J J
* 2 0 H  D OCT    Qg  OTHCO                              gus CIYYCN'AO      HOH-aMCHQK SIMULATOR      WHP 2 TRAINING J P  M A M  J J A $ 0 H      D    J P M A M J  J A 2  0 H D CY I PS ~ OIMULAT02 TPAIHIHO  CY SPOT This Month:        For the month of March, a total of 8,716.25 student hours of training were provided for Supply System and contractor personnel.
 
CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the total number of classroom (instructor) hours scheduled and the total number of classroom (instructor) hours actually provided for Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET) and other, Licensed, Non-Licensed, and Simulator training.
TOTAL CLASSROOM                    HOURS OF TRAINING CLASSIIOOI4 (IHSTIIVCTOII) HOIPIS
                                ~ A
                                ~  2 I2
                                ~  ~
0d O,A 02 02 0  ~
0 J 2  M  A M J J A S 0    44  0    J T  I4 A M  J J A ~ 0 H 0 KI4CDVLSD            gag  %4FZ MAINTENANCE-GET                OTHER TRAINING                                LICENSED        8c  NON-LICENSED TRAINING cLA$$ $ 0044 (IHsTsvclos) Nouds                                                    cLA$$ $ 00LI (INsTsvcTCII) Hovlls 0 ~
0 A 500
    ~ M A M
            ~J J A 2 iENSDVLSD O  II O      J  T' gyp A I4 J J A S
                                            %49 0 H D                  J 2  M A M J J A S 0 H REI4cDVLSD D
                                                                                                                        ~
J 2  44 A M J WclVAV J A S 0 H D SIMULATOR            TRAINING cLA$$ $ 00M ($ 4$ TSvcTDS) HCVIIs MJJASOHO
                                                  ~  QNSDVL20 J 2  M A I4 gag 9XATAi~
J J A S 0  H 0 This Month:                A  total of 790 classroom (instructor) hours were scheduled                                    for the month of March, and a total of 1,020.25 classroom (instructor) hours were actually provided.
                                                                        -  31
 
'4
  'l
    ~
 
NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The  results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.
NRC EXAMINATION    WHP 2 (RO) 10 77 I
lal B
65 Cl 22 1    1  1  1 0      0                OOO JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$ 6 FEB$ 6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED                  PASSED          gggg    F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION      WNP 2 (SR 0) 26 20        1Q    1Q 10 4  45              44  ~
5 1
0 JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4HOV$4 DKC64 MAY$5 JAH66 FKB$6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED            Qgg PASSED            @gag    F'AILED NOTE:        The following  exams have been    gi ven:
July, 1983              Cold License Exams    -  Phase  I October, 1983          Cold License Exams    -  Phase  II March, 1984            Retakes November, 1984          Mot License Exams December, 1984          Requalification    Exams May, 1985              Retakes January, 1986          Requalification    Exams February, 1986          Mot License Exams (1 Retake)
August, 1986            Mot License Exams
~ 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.
This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.
                  ~
QA AUDIT WNP      DEFICIENCIES 2
40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D          '
F M A M J    J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd        CLOSED              REMA ININO IDENTIFIED                              Qggg C
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.
This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.
QA SURVEILLANCE        WNP 2 DEFICIENCIES 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I  M  A'M J    J  A S 0 N D    J F'  A M J  J A S 0 N    D CY 19SS                            REMA ININO IDENTII IED          QQg CLOSED        g3Pg
      '3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review    of industry operating experiences pertinent to                          WNP-2  is    accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG). This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry. The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis. The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.
MONTHLY OER WHP      PROGRAM          STATUS                            CUMULATIVE OERWHPP2RO GRAM STATUS 2                                        2, ~
2,4 2 2 2
                                                                    ~ 8 g
0S OA 02 0
0 H 0              J F  M A M  J J  A S  0  H D    J F M A M J J
* S 0 H 0 J F M A M ASSIOrR        ~
J J A 2 0 H 0    J F CI.OSCD        ~
M A M  J J A ~
SACICIOO CY Isis AssIDCCD          x  CLOSCD CT ~PSSF WCX4DO OER PROGRAM        WHP 2 BACKLOG 200 Q
200 J F M
* M  J  J A 2 0 H 0      J F M A M J J A 2 0 H        D AWAITIHO 2&IRA                Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month:        In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245. The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.
SER/SOER  STATUS The graphs below are a break              out of the Significant Event Report (SER) and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER) status on a monthly and cumulative basis.
SIGNIFICANTMOHTHLY  EVENT REPORTS                                    SIGNIFICANT              EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC
~ SO
~ 20
~ 10 1OO
  ~0 SO TO 4O SO                                                                    200 20 20 10 0                                                                                      J J A S 0 H 0            J S M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 J 2 gg M A M ASSIOHCOCY J J A S 0 H 0 gag CLOS20 J P'
                                              'gA M J J A S Q~ASOCSSS 0 H 0            J 2  M A M I
TOTAL ASS IOHCO          \
x  TOTAL CLOSC0 CY ISST    v  SACK400 SIGNIFICANT OPERATING                      EVENT REPORTS                SIGNIFICANT OPERATING                    IV2 EVENT REPORTS M OIITHLY                                                                      LAY
                                                                                                                                                'U 20 20 28                                                                      TO 24 22 20
  ~0
  \~
IA
  ~
  ~
2 0
I      20 0
4 2
0 J S IJ A  M J J A S O H 0      J S  M A M J J A S 0 H 0              J 2  M A M  J J
* S 0  H 0      J P'  A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 SSS                      CY ASST gg  ASSIOH20        gZ  CLOS20          9g 'WASOCCSS            o  tOTAl ASS OH CO CY ~
x  TOTAL CLOSC0            v  SACKLOO This Month:          For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged.        Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.
EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety. The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators: (1) the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2) the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.
For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and                a  lost time accident rate of 0.7.
RECORDABLE INJURIES    WHF 2 AT THE PLANT                            RECORDABLE INJURY            2 INCIDENT RATE
                                                                ~  2 Oo
                                                                ~ 2 OO
                                                                '1 ~ OO 1O Oo
                                                                    ~ Oo J  OO 2 Oo 1I12 l(SADLY SOAL            X,oo 1
                                                                    ~  OO aoo J F M A M J  J A S  0 H D  J F M
* M  J J A S  0 H 0                J F M A M J  J A S  0  H 0    J F M A M    J J A S 0 H 0 CY 1SSY                                                                    CY  SSFe SCCOSDAKC MJVSCS                                              0  wN  2 tiheSHY sAYS
                                                                                                                  ~
OOA1 LOST TIME        ACCIDENTS WHF 2 LOST TIME ACCIDENT  2 RATE 2 OO ISO 2 Oo aoo 0 Jo O. 20 0 0                                                              aoo 0
J F M A M J J A S 0 H  D  J F M A M    J J A S 0 H    D              J F M  A M J  J A S 0 H  D    J F M A M    J J A S 0 H D CY  122~                  CY 12SF                                    0  wN<<S IKceelY sAYs          CY 12SFe    Ookl This Month:          During the month of March there was one recordable                          injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.
C
    ~ ~
b
 
SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT Support    for outage and nonroutine mai ntenance activities are being provided                      by a  site support contract. The graphs below depict the monthly contracted manpower, the regular hours versus overtime hours worked by contracted employees per month, the number of tasks bei ng worked on per month, and the cumulative personnel        exposure.
SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT                  MANPOWER            SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT                    HOURS WORKED WHP 2                                                          WHP 2 220 2OO 2OO 200 220 2OO
~ OO
~ OO
~ AO
~ 2O 1 OO OO
  ~0 JO 2O 0                                                                                                                      0
* J J A 2 J P  M A M  J J A ~
CY IOOO 0 H D  J P M CY M  J J A 2 0 H I OCT D        J F M A M J M OVAL J A 2 0 H 0
                                                                                          ~
                                                                                                ~    J P M A OY22TISZ M
4NL H D SITE SUPPORT WHP      CONTRACT        TASKS              SITE SUPPORT            CONTRACT EXPOSURE
                                                                                    ~ 2CHTCI UOC YTD AT WHP 2 2
J A 2 0 H 0                  J J A 2 0 H 0          J P V A M J J A 2 0 H J  P M A V J Qgjg 2TAAT20        ~
J A 2 0 H 0 COMBED J P M A M J QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M CY  ~ 042 CXP0OU II2 CY IPST D
This Month:          In March the contractor headcount was 98.
h I I ~
I 1
t
 
P SECURITY Security compensatory time is required to provide escort service inside vital areas and guard coverage for failed security equipment. The first graph depicts the number of hours that security officers were assigned to compensate for failed security access equipment and to escort non-cleared maintenance and outside service personnel inside vital areas.
The second graph      depicts the  number of Supply System employees and all other personnel    (i.e., contractor,    BPA, and NRC) that have been screened and granted unescorted    access    to WNP-2.
SECURITY COMPENSATORY                              HOURS WNP 2 2 6 4
2 2 1  b 1  6 1  4 1  2 0 6 0+6 04 02 J  F  M  A M J    J A S 0 N D      J  F  M  A M J  J A S 0 N  D CY 19b7 TOTAL COM PENS HOURS UNESCORTED ACCESS                  WNP 2 AUTHORIZATIONS 1  b 1+7 1  6 1 ~ 6 1  4 O    1 gOC~  1  2 I
  <<n
    ~
09 0b 1
O~  07 g~  0 6 O.d 04 O.d 02 0.1 0
J  F M A M J      J A S 0 N D      J  F  M  A M J J A S  0  N D CY 1966                      CY 1 967 SUPPLY SYSTEM                    ALL OTHERS This Month:        A  total of 705.7 hours were expended in March by the Security organization in compensatory support. Unescorted access to WNP-2 for Supply System personnel during March was 1,170 and for all others was 213.
 
SPARE PARTS The graphs below   depict the line items of operational spare parts identified to be carried in   inventory for MNP-2 and line items currently available in inventory. It is estimated that 25,000 line items will eventually be carried in the MNP-2 spare parts inventory.
SPARE PARTSWNP            XDENTXFXCATXON 2
30 2d 26 24 22 20 r cn v7 18 16 o3 L
14 I~~   12 10 8
J F'     A M J J A S 0 N D           J F   M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986                       CY 198T 0 TARO ET         o   IDENTIFIED             o   REMAIN FOR IDENT SPARE PARTS       WNP 2 ON HAND 30 2d 24 20
~n     18
~oVl 16 12 10 0
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D           J F   M A M J J   A S   0 N D oCY 1986 IDENTIFIED            o CY 198T ON HAND C}}

Latest revision as of 08:21, 4 February 2020

Washington Nuclear Plant 2 Performance Indicator Rept.
ML17279A234
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/1987
From:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
Shared Package
ML17279A232 List:
References
NUDOCS 8704290316
Download: ML17279A234 (67)


Text

87042903i6 870422 PDR ADQCN 05000397 P PDR WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT March, 1987 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER 4N SUPPLY SYSTEM 40993.1A

)CT 1984

Prepared By Performance Evaluation WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT FOREWARD The purpose of this report is to furnish Supply System management with performance data in selected key operational areas. The data is graphically di splayed to provide visual trends and present comparisons with industry data, Supply System Corporate goals and WNP-2 plant goals. The report is anticipated to be dynamic. Indicators will be added or deleted, as appropriate, to define problem areas and display performance trends.

WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency Responsible

~of Re ort Or anization ~Pa e OPERATIONS Net Electrical Generation Plant Operations Unit Availability Factor Plant Operations Unit Capacity Factor Plant Operations Unit Equivalent Availability Factor Plant Operations Plant Thermal Efficiency Plant Technical Forced Outages Plant Operations Unplanned Scrams Plant Operations Unplanned Safety System Actuations Plant Technical Control Room Instrument Operability Plant Operations MAINTENANCE MWR Status Plant Maintenance 10 Preventive Maintenance Status Plant Maintenance ll Equipment Out-of-Service Plant Maintenance 12 TECHNICAL Plant Modifications Engineering/Rcrds Mgmt 13 '4 Plant Drawing Revision Records Management Plant Drawing Revision Backlog Records Management 15 Non-Conformance Reports Plant Technical 16 Licensee Event Reports Plant Technical 17 HP/CHEMISTRY Personnel Exposure Radi ological 18 Solid Radwaste Radiological 19 Liquid Radwaste Radiological 20 Fuel Reliability Radiological 21 Plant Contaminated Areas Radiological 22 Personnel Contami nations Radiological 23 Water Chemistry Plant HP/Chemistry 24 ADMINISTRATION Plant Staffing Plant Administration 25 Plant Personnel Turnover Plant Administration 26 Plant Overtime Plant Administration 27 Plant Procedure Deviations Plant Administration 28 NRC Violations Plant Administration 29

I WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency Responsible

~of Re ort Or anization ~Pa e TRAINING Student Hours of Training Technical Training 30 Classroom (Instructor) Hours of Training M Technical Training 31 NRC Exam Performance Q Technical Training . 32 UAL ITY ASSURANCE QA Audit Def icienc ies Q Quality Assurance 33 QA Surveillance Deficiencies Q Quality Assurance 34 Operating Experience Review Status M NSAG 35 SER/SOER Status M NSAG 36 SUPPORT SERVICES Employee Safety Saf ety 37 Site Support Contract Mods/Upgrades 38 Securi ty Securi ty 39 MATERIAL MANAGEMENT Spare Parts Contracts/Mat'1 Control 40

0 v,

C NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION The graphs below depict WNP-2's monthly and year-to-date net electrical generation in megawatt hours as reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission per Regulatory Guide 1.16.

MONTHLY NET ELECTRICAL WNP 2 GENERATION bOO Cll CC dOO N

C O

Vl 0

5~

le I

0 J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 10bd CY 1sbV' a ACTUAL SCHEDULED CUMULATIVE NET ELECTRICAL WNP 2 GENERATION O~VI C

I I

gx Lal J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CY 19bT a ACTUAL o SCHEDULED This Month: The plant generated 516,206 MWH's during the month of March, continuing to operate in single loop configuration due to exces-sive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date total electrical generation is 1,487,899 MWH's and the cumulative since commercial operation is 12,257,896 MWH's.'

UNIT AVAILABILITYFACTOR Unit Availability Factor is the ratio of the Unit Available Hours (i.e., the sum of the total clock hours during the period that the generator operated on line plus the total clock hours during the period that the unit was in reserve shutdown, that is capable of operating on line,but for some reason did not) to the total clock hours contained in the period. The result is multiplied by 100 to express the factor as a percent.

Unit Availabilit Factor = (Unit Available Hours)(100)

Tota C oc Hours s n Per)o The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Availability Factor for WNP-2 as it relates to the 1985 industry average for BWRs.

U NIT AVAILABILITY WNP 2 FACTO B 1 20%

110%

1 O0%

g &O%

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 1QSd CY 1 987 a ACTUAL 198d IHD AVO This Month: Unit availability for the month of March was 92.29%. The year-to-date unit availability is 91.43'X and the cumulative since commercial operation is 77.12%.

UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR Unit Capacity Factor is the ratio of the net electrical energy generated during a given period of time to the maximum dependable capacity (MDC), times the total number of clock hours during the period.

- Unit acit Factor Net Electrical Ener Generated x 100 i e Ca =

Maximum Dependable Capacity x Period Hours The first graph below depicts the monthly capacity factor as it relates to the 1985 industry averages for BWRs. The second graph depicts the cumulative capacity factor from commercial"operation through the current month.

UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR 1 2C%

1 1 O%

1 00%

BC'C%

b~

bO%

P sow J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Sbe 10bT a ACTUAL o 10bb INDCYAVO CUMULATIVE UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%

J F M A M J J A .S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9bà CUMULATIVE CAP FAC This Month: Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.

0 H

I

'I

UNIT EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITYFACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor is the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at a maximum capacity. Discretionary operations below maximum permitted power for economic reasons such as reserve shutdowns do not reduce equivalent availability.

Gross Available Equi valent Unit Equi valent Seasonal Maximum Hours - Derated Hours - Derated Hours Capacity EAF = x 100%

Gross Maximum Capacity x en od Hours The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Equivalent Availability Factor of MNP-2 as it relates to the plant's FY 87 goal of 7(5. Per INPO, the 1985 industry average was 63.8'X.

EQUIVALENT UNIT E AVAILABILITYFACT OR WHP 2

'1 1C%

1 OC%

QC%

g SC%

7C%

SC%

SC%

Pg 4C%

I 5 SC%

2C%

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CY 1N7 a CURRENT MOHTH o WHP 2 COAL This Month: The unit equivalent availability factor for March was 66.74K, operating in single loop configuration due to excessive vibra-tion of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date equivalent availability factor is 64.6% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 59.49%.

PLANT THERl1AL EFFICIENCY The graphs below depict the monthly and cumulative heat rate (BTUs/Kwhr) since commercial operation. The third graph presents the plant's thermal efficiency expressed as a percent of the calculated design performance.

For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to maintain an overall plant thermal efficiency that will be better than 96% of the design thermal efficiency.

PLANT TIIERMAL WHA>>2 PERFORMANCE PLANT THERMAL WHd<<2 PERFORMANCE

~ 0.$ $

~ 0. $ A 22 ~ 0 $$

20 ~ Ck. $ 2

~ ddd MDUSTIIY AVCSAOC ld TO.$ l

~ 4 ~ ~ 0.$

SIN Y SYSTCM YYSY COAL

~ 0 ~ 0 2Y ld 2$

ld 2A 2 ld 2$

~ 0 22 J 2 V A V J J A S 0 H 0 J T V A V J J A S 0 H D J F II A V J J A S 0 H 0 J 2 V A M J J

  • S 0 H D CY ~ 444 CUSIICHT MOHTH 0 CUMGL O'Ad SIDUSTdf AVVIIAOC PLANT THERMAL WHA 2 EFFICIENCY F 20

~ IO IIY ~ T T4ASLT 40AL 20

~ 0 J Y M A M J'J A S 0 H 0 J 2 V A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY ~ ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month: The cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.

FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity. Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages. The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate. For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours0.00333 days <br />0.08 hours <br />4.761905e-4 weeks <br />1.09584e-4 months <br /> of unscheduled (forced) outage per calendar quarter.

Forced Outa e Hours Force utage ours + ours enerator n one HOUBS OF FORCED WHP 2 OUTAGE TIME TOO Q 800 Cl A.OO Ch 8OO 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE WNP 2 BATE 1 DC' EK lal CP 0

Ch O

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 1 98T QQg CURRENT MONTH 4

5 This Month: During the month of March, there were 57.33 forced outage hours for a forced outage rate of 8%.

UNPLANNED SCRAMS An unplanned scram is defined as the actuation of the reactor protection system that results in a scram signal any time the reactor is critical. The signal may be automatically initiated as the result of exceeding a setpoint or manually initiated by the control room operator depressing the scram button.

The graph below depicts the number of unplanned scrams, both manual and automatic, that occurred while the reactor was critical and required the initiation of a Licensee Event Report. Scrams that are planned as part of special evolutions or tests are not included in this indicator.

For FY 87, the MNP-2 goal is to not exceed three unplanned scrams during the fiscal year. Per INPO, the 1986 industry average was 3.9 scrams per unit.

UNPLANNED WNP 2 SCBAMS 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N 0 Qdd CY 1sd7

%26 MANUAL Qg3g AUTO MAYIC This Month: During the month of March, there was one unplanned manual scram.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS An Unplanned Safety System Actuation is defined as an event or condition that results in an unplanned manual or automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF). The two major ESF systems included in this indicator are the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) and the Emergency AC Power system.

ECCS actuations are the result of reaching a setpoint which activates one of the following systems: automatic depressurization system, high pressure core spray, low pressure coolant injection and low pressure core spray systems.

Emergency AC power actuations are a result of loss of a safeguards bus.

The graph below depicts the number of unplanned actuations of the ECCS and Emergency AC Power Systems only.

The FY 87 goal for MNP-2 is to not exceed one unplanned ECCS challenge per quarter.

UNPLANNED SAFETY WNP SYSTEM ACTVATIONS I

I Cl J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S O N D CY '0 ECCS 96T AC POWER QQg CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours. The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason. This includes instruments on control room back panels.

CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED WNP 2 ANNUNCIATORS 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 C) 1 10 I 100 c3 eo 7'0 Cl 60 lal 60 I 40 0 60 C 20 10 IL' 0

F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bb MONTH CY 19'URRENT CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S WNP 2 OUT OF SERVICE 24 20 16 16 14 Q

12 III Cl 10 Q I 5 6 6 0 C

ll K

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 1 96T OUT OF SERVICE

MAINTENANCE WORK RE(VEST STATUS The Maintenance Work Request (MWR) is the document control used to initiate and record maintenance activities and plant modifications performed by the Plant Maintenance staff at the plant site. The monthly status of the WNP-2 MWRs (i.e., those issued, closed, and remaining open at month's end) is graphically displayed below. Also depicted is a breakout of MWRs requiring outage conditions to complete. Preventive maintenance items are not included as a part of MWRs.

MAINTENANCE WORK REQUEST STATUS

~ ,~

~ ,5

~ ,4

~ 2

~ 2 I ~

Ij 05 04 05 02 0 I 0

J J A 5 0 H 0

~

J F M A M gag 125IscP ~

J J A 5 0 H D cs.Deco J P M A M gag X%+5<<HO OUTAGE 8c NONOUTAGE WHP 2 MWR BACKLOG

~ .5

~ 5

~ A

~ 2 OA 02 02 0 1 0

J P M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 J II' A M J J A 5 0 H D

~ 5~

0 5ACICLQ OUTA OC e OT4ovfAo2 CLASS-I MWR'SWHPIN2 THE BACKLOG

~,5

~,5 IA I 2

~ 2 0.5 O,A O.a 02 0 I 0

J 5 M A M J J A 5 0 H D J F M A LI J J A 5 0 H D aA CII100 C~C" -'f5~

This Month: During the month of March, 443 MWRs were issued, 342 closed, with a total of 1,442 remaining open including 686 that require an outage to complete.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STATUS Preventive Maintenance (PM) is maintenance which is scheduled and performed on a routine basis to preclude costly and unplanned breakdowns of operating equipment. PM is controlled by a computerized card system which lists the PM to be performed on each piece of equipment, along with the date it is due.

The graph below depicts the monthly manhours of PM work scheduled, completed, and backlogged by the WNP-2 Plant Maintenance organization.

PBEVENTXVE MAXNTENANCE WNP 2 STATUS C/l vs

o. o X

~ o Rs J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY HE DU LE D COMPLETED 196'C Qgg SACK LOO This Month: During the month of March, 5,620 hours0.00718 days <br />0.172 hours <br />0.00103 weeks <br />2.3591e-4 months <br /> of PM work were scheduled, 1,987 PM hours were completed, with a total of 6,582 remaining in backlog.

- 11

EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE Out of service equipment is categorized as that hardware which if removed from service would have an impact on Plant Availability or Plant Capacity Factors.

The graph below depict the numbers of major pieces of hardware that were out of service during each month.

EQUIPMENT OUT WHP 2 OF SERVICE 26 24 22 20 I

16 C7 14 4 12 Ql CA Cl 1O C

I C1 0

D 4

2 4 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY 1 OF SKRVICR 9'UT This Month: Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko. 4; recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs; main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch; and condensate booster pump 2C for oil pump repairs.

PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management. After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.

The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.

TOTAL PLANTWNP MODIFICATIONS 2

1 2 C/l C)

C)

O 0 06 0T gg I W

0 6 0.%

0+4 O.B 02 1

0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1 98F NKW Qgg COMPLETED QRI REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS WHP 2 IN ENGXNEERIN G 0 200 cg J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S 0 N D QS'7 HKW QPg COMPLETED KR 1 REMAINING This Month: A total of 725 PMR's remain backlogged of which 401 are in Engineering.

PLANT DRAWING REVISION The Plant is responsible for implementing design changes within the plant prior to drawing revision, and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.

The first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision. The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.

TOTAL DBAWING BEVISIONS ENGINEEBING WNP 2 ire

~Do CS ZDO 0

2OO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9ST RECEIVED ling REVISED AWAITINO REVISION TOTAL DBAWING WNP REVISIONS PLANT 2

t/l x

C7 Vl O ~

~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd Y 19ST RECEIVED Qgg IMPLEMENTED IEBRI T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog is 5,607 drawings.

PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.

(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.) The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.

DRAWING REVISION WHP BACKLOG COMPOSITION 2

2 RJ J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J ~' A M J J A 2 0 H 0 gg POETIC II Qgg AIJ OTH5 TOP TIER DRAWING BACKLOG STATUS ALL OTHER DRAWING WHP 2 BACKLOG STATUS WHP 2 2

~ COO RJ 2

J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J' M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0

~WAIT PLAN IMk QQ9 AVE% NS UPOATC fjgg AWAIT PLAN IA, AVE% VIL3 UPOATC This flonth: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.

Plant En ineerin Total Top Tier 470 0 470 All Others 4,855 282 5,137 Total ,325 ~82 ,607 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs) may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency. The first graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month. The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout of the monthly NCR's by category (i.e., administrative/hardware).

MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE WHP REPORTS J F M A M I22lRG J J A 2 0 H D Qgg CL0220 J F M

~A M J J A 2 VACIILDO 0 H D CUMULATIVE NON CONFORMANCE WHP REPORTS 2, ~

2 4 2 2 2

0 J F M A 1I J J A 2 0 H ~ 0 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D CY NLTIAATDI2 x VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG WHP 2 CATEGORIES ADO g

200 J F M A M gag J J A 2 0 H D AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC ~ HNKWAPC Thi s Month: In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332. Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.

I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs) and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies. The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.

LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER) eNNP 2 100 70 50 O

Of.

eo 40 30 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 19115 CY 1957 o ISSUCD OC CUMULA'TIVS 1%I7 o I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I CATESIY I J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0 e J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0I I e f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~~ oo ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e PHSRJ8. E89Ht I 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 I IjESIIfBINIIRIINSTAU.WI 2 1 1 2 1 2 I

EITHNL< I 1 e

IjEFICIHIT l%0CHjIIHI-9 I 1 1 1 I e

C0598P FAIUIE< I I I me-I I 3 I 1 2 2 1 I 1

'I ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ I IOIKYT0TALI 2 0 2 2 5 6 7 4 3 3 3 7 I 2 0 0 YEAR TOINTE I 2 2 I 6 11 17 2l 28 31 8 37 44 2 2 2 I I e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

This Month: A total of zero LERs were submitted in the month of March.

0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure. For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal of 230 man-rem was establ'ished. The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.

The bottom graph depicts exposure distribution.

MONTHLY EXPOSURE CUMULATIVE HHr-2 EXPOSURE YW1 2 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A ~ 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A ~ 0 H 0 OY ~ SSS OY ~ SSY OY 102$

0 OY KtZ CALENDAR YTD EXPOSURE 2 DISTRIBUTION 2,A 2 2 2

o,s OA 0,2 0

HOHC R1R ~ 2R 2 SR 2 AR A SR Ci2ZI vARoH 21 ~ 1 est This Month: The monthly exposure for all radiation workers at WNP-2 in March was 4.653 man-rem.

SOLID RADWASTE Solid radwaste includes two products: (1) solidified radioactive waste which is the accumulation of radioactive products (sludge, resins, filter cake) removed by liquid and gaseous processing systems; and (2) contaminated solid materials (disposable gloves, smears, trash) generated as a result of mainten-ance activities. These graphs depict the monthly and cumulative cubic feet of solidified radioactive waste and dry active waste generated at WNP-2 and subsequently shipped off site.

For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to limit the volume of solid radwaste shipped from the plant to 25,000 cubic feet.

SOLID, RADWASTE GENERATED DRY ACTIVE RADWASTE GENERATED WHO-2 WHO 2 J 2 M A M J J A $ 0 H D J F M A M J J A $ 0 H 0 J t M A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 CY 1$ $ o$

J T' A M J J A ~ 0 H D CY ~ $ $ YOLAHT COAL CY 1$ $ $ CY ~ $ 27 o MOHTIO Y CUMULATIVC o o MOHTHLY CUMULATIVC RADIOACTIVE WASTE WHO 2 SHIPPED OFF SITE J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J P M A M J J A $ 0 H D CY 1$ $ ~$ CY ~ $ $ 'F o MOHTHLY CUMULATIVC This Month: Total radioactive waste (i.e., solidified and dry active) generated during March was 720 cubic feet.

LIQUID RADWASTE Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the production of radioactive liquid waste. Processing systems are operated to minimize the radioactive content of these liquids. The following graph depicts, the gallons of liquid discharged (without dilution) to the river from WNP-2, and also the liquid effluent whole body dose.

VOLUME OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE '%PASTE WNP 2 4 C gl O r

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19db CY 1957 o CURRENT MONTH x CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENTWNP%HOLE 2 BODY DOSE MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3

0 020 0 010 0 000 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd CY 19dT o WHOLE BODY DOSE x CUMULATIVE FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure. MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01 ) microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.

FUEL RELIABILITY (I1 3 1 )

MICROCURIES PER CRAM 1 SE 04 1 7E 04 1 eE 04 1 5E 04 1 4E 04 1 e3E 04 1 2E 04 1'. 1 E 04 1 OE 04 9 OE 05 S OE 05 tll 7 OE 05 S.OE-05 5 OE 05 0 4iOK 05 C 3.0 E 05 a a

2 OE 05 E 1 OE 05 0 OK&00 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be CY 19S7 a MONTHLY AVERAOE This Month: Present monthly readings are greater than 3 decades below the Technical Specification limit.

- 21

PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination. This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems. Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas. The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month. This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.

SQUARE FEET OF WNR CONTAMINATED AREA 40 tai n 30 4 cCS g~~ 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1066 CY 196T SOU ARK FRET PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant. Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.

PERSONNEL SKIN CONTAMINATIONS WHP 2 26 26 C/l 24 22 20 K

16 C) 14 la Cl 12 10 6

0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F' A M JJ A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 198T CUAHTITY This Month: There were five personnel skin contaminations during the month of March.

WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper. The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen. The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.

CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I aAoo O.OOO J C M A M J J A 0 0 H D J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 o ouoealv'I o4ne sA" oui~

DISSOLVED WHO C OXYGEN COPPER wHP 2 Cu

~,OOO aooo aooo TO acoo aooo aAoo g

O.COO O COO O ~ OO O OOO J Ã M A M J J A O 0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 0 CuoiiCHT MOMECY ~ Coo ~ wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO o Ou CAY'OW w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g

J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 DcolSH $%ciA PLANT STAFFING The graph below depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.

PLANT STAFF P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I 480 420 410 400 580 5TO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 10bd CY ON CY 198T a BOARD AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month: Budgeted staff for FY 87 is 467, the actual for March was 464.

PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below reflect the monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff. This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring. The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.

PLANT P EBSONNEL WNP 2 TUBNOVEB 50 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb CY 1 QbV O CUMULATIVE CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSOWNP NNEL2 TUBNOVEB 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0

MOR OPNS MAINT TECH ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81 ~ 1 QbT This Month: During March the plant experienced a turnover of three employees.

0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.

HO URS 0 F PLANT WNP 2 OVERTIME 1 30 1 20 1 10 90 gg CCI bO CD g TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 19bV RKOULAR HOURS OVKRTlMK HOURS PLANT OVERTIME WNR 2 IN PERCENT 40 I

3O CD I

20 laJ 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be CY 1 9b7 o ACTUAL W AU TH 0 Rl ZK0 This Month: A total of 6.72% overtime was worked by the plant staff in March.

PLANT PROCEDURE DEVIATIONS A procedural deviation is an ~aroved modification to a procedure which does not change or compromise its intent. Approved deviations occur (1) when the plant has undergone modification and the original procedure must be updated to reflect the change, (2) when procedures are being used for the first time during initial equipment and process startup,'and (3) when the plant systems are in a testing mode and require temporary procedure modifications to complete the tests. The graph below depicts all safety-related, approved plant procedure deviations by month.

PLANT PROCEDVRE WNP 2 DEVIATIONS 280 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F

~ M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1M5 CURRENT MONTH CY 1$ bV This Month: During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.

NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total. The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to each violation. The FY 87 goal for WNP-2 is zero violations of Levels I, II or III severity.

NRC VIOLATIONS V/NP 2 60 TO 52 60 I

Cl 40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1955 CY 198T o WEIOHTEO CUM o CUMULATIVE a MONTHLY

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~

I N6 I 1%7 I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~~~~~~~~ aeeee ~ a ~ e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I SEVERITY I J F N A II J J A S 0 H DI J F II A II J J A S 0 H D I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aI ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I I I LEVEL I I LEVEL 11 I I LEVEL lll I I LEVEL IY I 11 4 5 1 I I I lEltEL Y I 1 1 -2

~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I

TOTAL) 0 0 0 1 0 0 $ 0 12 4 5 110 0 0 I TMTODATEI 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 4 16202526)0 0 0 I I IGEHIED YEA)ITODATE I 0 0 0 I 1 1 10 10 44 56 67 70 I 0 0 0 I I I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~

I LEVEL I I20) 616HIFICAHT LEVEL 11 I16) S16HIFICAHT VIRATIQ8 I)IVQ.V1% ACTUAL LEVEL Ill I10) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NE CNSE RI SISHIFICNIT GKESIL I

VIRATIQ8 IHVQ.VI% ACIlNL QI POTEHTIAL I)PACT OH TK POSLIC SESQ.TI% IH PEIILTIES.

PIEHTIN. INCT I IK PIRIC RESILTI% IH PNLTIES.

I I

I LEVEL IY I 5) LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81 Iff NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN' IEVEL V I I) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A IIIII SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfALGKEK I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I This Month: For the month of March, there were zero violations issued against WNP-2 by the NRC.

STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET),

and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.

TOTAL HOURS OFWHP STUDENT TRAINING 2

J J A 2 0 H J A 2 0 H D J P M A M gZPCJNWTI C D

~

J P M A M J 8Z Rt0 MAINTENANCE-GET-OTHER TRAINING LICENSED & NON LICENSED TRAINING WHP 2 WHP 2 J P M A M'J J A 2 0 H 0 J 1 M A M J J

  • 2 0 H D OCT Qg OTHCO gus CIYYCN'AO HOH-aMCHQK SIMULATOR WHP 2 TRAINING J P M A M J J A $ 0 H D J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D CY I PS ~ OIMULAT02 TPAIHIHO CY SPOT This Month: For the month of March, a total of 8,716.25 student hours of training were provided for Supply System and contractor personnel.

CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the total number of classroom (instructor) hours scheduled and the total number of classroom (instructor) hours actually provided for Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET) and other, Licensed, Non-Licensed, and Simulator training.

TOTAL CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING CLASSIIOOI4 (IHSTIIVCTOII) HOIPIS

~ A

~ 2 I2

~ ~

0d O,A 02 02 0 ~

0 J 2 M A M J J A S 0 44 0 J T I4 A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 KI4CDVLSD gag %4FZ MAINTENANCE-GET OTHER TRAINING LICENSED 8c NON-LICENSED TRAINING cLA$$ $ 0044 (IHsTsvclos) Nouds cLA$$ $ 00LI (INsTsvcTCII) Hovlls 0 ~

0 A 500

~ M A M

~J J A 2 iENSDVLSD O II O J T' gyp A I4 J J A S

%49 0 H D J 2 M A M J J A S 0 H REI4cDVLSD D

~

J 2 44 A M J WclVAV J A S 0 H D SIMULATOR TRAINING cLA$$ $ 00M ($ 4$ TSvcTDS) HCVIIs MJJASOHO

~ QNSDVL20 J 2 M A I4 gag 9XATAi~

J J A S 0 H 0 This Month: A total of 790 classroom (instructor) hours were scheduled for the month of March, and a total of 1,020.25 classroom (instructor) hours were actually provided.

- 31

'4

'l

~

NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.

NRC EXAMINATION WHP 2 (RO) 10 77 I

lal B

65 Cl 22 1 1 1 1 0 0 OOO JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$ 6 FEB$ 6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED PASSED gggg F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION WNP 2 (SR 0) 26 20 1Q 1Q 10 4 45 44 ~

5 1

0 JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4HOV$4 DKC64 MAY$5 JAH66 FKB$6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED Qgg PASSED @gag F'AILED NOTE: The following exams have been gi ven:

July, 1983 Cold License Exams - Phase I October, 1983 Cold License Exams - Phase II March, 1984 Retakes November, 1984 Mot License Exams December, 1984 Requalification Exams May, 1985 Retakes January, 1986 Requalification Exams February, 1986 Mot License Exams (1 Retake)

August, 1986 Mot License Exams

~ 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.

This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.

~

QA AUDIT WNP DEFICIENCIES 2

40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D '

F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CLOSED REMA ININO IDENTIFIED Qggg C

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.

This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.

QA SURVEILLANCE WNP 2 DEFICIENCIES 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I M A'M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19SS REMA ININO IDENTII IED QQg CLOSED g3Pg

'3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review of industry operating experiences pertinent to WNP-2 is accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG). This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry. The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis. The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.

MONTHLY OER WHP PROGRAM STATUS CUMULATIVE OERWHPP2RO GRAM STATUS 2 2, ~

2,4 2 2 2

~ 8 g

0S OA 02 0

0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J

  • S 0 H 0 J F M A M ASSIOrR ~

J J A 2 0 H 0 J F CI.OSCD ~

M A M J J A ~

SACICIOO CY Isis AssIDCCD x CLOSCD CT ~PSSF WCX4DO OER PROGRAM WHP 2 BACKLOG 200 Q

200 J F M

  • M J J A 2 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D AWAITIHO 2&IRA Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month: In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245. The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.

SER/SOER STATUS The graphs below are a break out of the Significant Event Report (SER) and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER) status on a monthly and cumulative basis.

SIGNIFICANTMOHTHLY EVENT REPORTS SIGNIFICANT EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC

~ SO

~ 20

~ 10 1OO

~0 SO TO 4O SO 200 20 20 10 0 J J A S 0 H 0 J S M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 J 2 gg M A M ASSIOHCOCY J J A S 0 H 0 gag CLOS20 J P'

'gA M J J A S Q~ASOCSSS 0 H 0 J 2 M A M I

TOTAL ASS IOHCO \

x TOTAL CLOSC0 CY ISST v SACK400 SIGNIFICANT OPERATING EVENT REPORTS SIGNIFICANT OPERATING IV2 EVENT REPORTS M OIITHLY LAY

'U 20 20 28 TO 24 22 20

~0

\~

IA

~

~

2 0

I 20 0

4 2

0 J S IJ A M J J A S O H 0 J S M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J 2 M A M J J

  • S 0 H 0 J P' A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 SSS CY ASST gg ASSIOH20 gZ CLOS20 9g 'WASOCCSS o tOTAl ASS OH CO CY ~

x TOTAL CLOSC0 v SACKLOO This Month: For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged. Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.

EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety. The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators: (1) the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2) the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.

For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and a lost time accident rate of 0.7.

RECORDABLE INJURIES WHF 2 AT THE PLANT RECORDABLE INJURY 2 INCIDENT RATE

~ 2 Oo

~ 2 OO

'1 ~ OO 1O Oo

~ Oo J OO 2 Oo 1I12 l(SADLY SOAL X,oo 1

~ OO aoo J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M

  • M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY 1SSY CY SSFe SCCOSDAKC MJVSCS 0 wN 2 tiheSHY sAYS

~

OOA1 LOST TIME ACCIDENTS WHF 2 LOST TIME ACCIDENT 2 RATE 2 OO ISO 2 Oo aoo 0 Jo O. 20 0 0 aoo 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 122~ CY 12SF 0 wN<<S IKceelY sAYs CY 12SFe Ookl This Month: During the month of March there was one recordable injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.

C

~ ~

b

SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT Support for outage and nonroutine mai ntenance activities are being provided by a site support contract. The graphs below depict the monthly contracted manpower, the regular hours versus overtime hours worked by contracted employees per month, the number of tasks bei ng worked on per month, and the cumulative personnel exposure.

SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT MANPOWER SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT HOURS WORKED WHP 2 WHP 2 220 2OO 2OO 200 220 2OO

~ OO

~ OO

~ AO

~ 2O 1 OO OO

~0 JO 2O 0 0

  • J J A 2 J P M A M J J A ~

CY IOOO 0 H D J P M CY M J J A 2 0 H I OCT D J F M A M J M OVAL J A 2 0 H 0

~

~ J P M A OY22TISZ M

4NL H D SITE SUPPORT WHP CONTRACT TASKS SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT EXPOSURE

~ 2CHTCI UOC YTD AT WHP 2 2

J A 2 0 H 0 J J A 2 0 H 0 J P V A M J J A 2 0 H J P M A V J Qgjg 2TAAT20 ~

J A 2 0 H 0 COMBED J P M A M J QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M CY ~ 042 CXP0OU II2 CY IPST D

This Month: In March the contractor headcount was 98.

h I I ~

I 1

t

P SECURITY Security compensatory time is required to provide escort service inside vital areas and guard coverage for failed security equipment. The first graph depicts the number of hours that security officers were assigned to compensate for failed security access equipment and to escort non-cleared maintenance and outside service personnel inside vital areas.

The second graph depicts the number of Supply System employees and all other personnel (i.e., contractor, BPA, and NRC) that have been screened and granted unescorted access to WNP-2.

SECURITY COMPENSATORY HOURS WNP 2 2 6 4

2 2 1 b 1 6 1 4 1 2 0 6 0+6 04 02 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19b7 TOTAL COM PENS HOURS UNESCORTED ACCESS WNP 2 AUTHORIZATIONS 1 b 1+7 1 6 1 ~ 6 1 4 O 1 gOC~ 1 2 I

<<n

~

09 0b 1

O~ 07 g~ 0 6 O.d 04 O.d 02 0.1 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 1 967 SUPPLY SYSTEM ALL OTHERS This Month: A total of 705.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> were expended in March by the Security organization in compensatory support. Unescorted access to WNP-2 for Supply System personnel during March was 1,170 and for all others was 213.

SPARE PARTS The graphs below depict the line items of operational spare parts identified to be carried in inventory for MNP-2 and line items currently available in inventory. It is estimated that 25,000 line items will eventually be carried in the MNP-2 spare parts inventory.

SPARE PARTSWNP XDENTXFXCATXON 2

30 2d 26 24 22 20 r cn v7 18 16 o3 L

14 I~~ 12 10 8

J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 198T 0 TARO ET o IDENTIFIED o REMAIN FOR IDENT SPARE PARTS WNP 2 ON HAND 30 2d 24 20

~n 18

~oVl 16 12 10 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D oCY 1986 IDENTIFIED o CY 198T ON HAND C