ML17292A392
| ML17292A392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1996 |
| From: | Galioto K, Meehan K WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17292A389 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9608060298 | |
| Download: ML17292A392 (118) | |
Text
WNP-2 TEN MILE EPZ EVACUATIONTIME ESTIMATE STUDY 10ml j SASOI 0'ml Hanford Site Oaoeeag
~ Pal SITNLIE Franklin
+/
J, INC Saa W I tf. County ISAAC L%5tR STEVENS OSOVSS IIIOOLX tANN 12 II N. 25~4P Benton County June 1996 vlslon 3 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM 9608060298 960730 PDR ADOCK 05000397 F PDR
WNP-2 TEN MILE EPZ EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATE STUDY
~ oo wan
~I OOIWClj
/
'i~a iib/
Sm 0
Hsnlord Site Franklin County W IITOI OTt SOI I N NW ~ kkC
~ TtYIW 12 Bonton County Prepared by Kevin Galioto/Kevin P. Meehan June 1996 Revision 3 Reviewed By:
A'ead, cg Offsite Emergency Planner Date Approved By: Oza rpor t mer ency eparedness, Date Safety and Health Officer WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPL Y SYSTEM
0 0 I
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 DISTRIBUTION No. of Co ies Internal 1 Corporate EP, S & H Officer 1 Emergency Planner (Preparer) 1 Emergency Preparedness Library 1 Technical Support Center 1 Emergency Operations Facility 1 Meteorology & Unified Dose Assessment Center 1 WNP-2 Licensing 7
External NRC Licensing - 4 copies
~ 1 to Public Doc. Room
~ 1 to Resident Inspector
~ 2 to NRC Region IV 2 FEMA Region X 2 . DOE - Richland, 2 WA State Department of Emergency Management 1 Benton Co. Emergency Management Agency 1 Franklin Co. Emergency Management Agency 12 19 TOTAL eVA CVA77.$ TVIW:IEP u
i/
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND RESOURCES .. lv EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I. - INTRODUCTION A. Site Location & Emergency Planning Zone . 2 B. General'ssumptions ..... ~........ 3 C. Methodology 5 II. - DEMAND ESTIMATION....... ~ .. ~........... 6 A. Permanent Residents 6 B. Transient Population 7 C. Special Facility Population................ 9 D. Emergency Planning Zone, Sub-Areas and Sectors . 10 III. - TRAFFIC CAPACITY 11 A. Evacuation Roadway Netwo ks .................... 11 B. Roadway Segment Characteristics 13 C. Assistance Centers.......'.'................... 14 IV. - ANALYSIS OF EVACUATION TIMES 16 A., Time Estimates................................. 16 B. Adverse Weather 17 V. - OTHER REQUIREMENTS................. 18 A. Recommendations 18 B. Review of Study by State and Local Officials 19 VI. - REFERENCES 20 APPENDICES.... ~ .. ...... ~ 21 EVACVA77.$ 7VIIV:IEP ul
~ .
WI J ~
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study II i ~
Revision 3 - June 1996
'1 ~
APPENDICES LIST OF FIGURES TABLES AND RESOURCES Figure 1 Ten-Mile Emergency Planning Zone . 22 Figure 2 Link Node Maps............. ... 23 Figure 3 Evacuation Routes - Access Control Points, Traffic 24 Control Points, and Assistance Centers Figure 4, Total Population in the Ten-Mile EPZ, Broken Down.... 25 into Classifications Figure 5 Distribution of Transient Population in the Ten-Mile EPZ 26 Figure 6 series Percent Evacuated vs. Time for Various Populations and Conditions ("S Curves" for Ten-Mile EPZ) 6A - Permanent Population- Normal Conditions ...... 27 6B - Permanent Population - Adverse Conditions..... ~ 28 6C - General Population - Normal Conditions . 29 6D - General Population - Adverse Conditions 30 Table 1 Permanent Population Distribution 31 Table 2 Transient Population Distribution........ 32 Table 3 Special Facility Population Distribution 33 Table 4 Maximum Population Distribution ... 34 Table 5 Roadway Characteristics ......,..... . 35 Table 6 Summary of Results of Evacuation Time Analysis ......... 36 Resource 1 Example Computer Run EVACUA D. STV/KlEP iv
0 0
0
Ex MAP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~ -
Evacuation lime Estimate Study
.Revision 3 - June 2996
~
~
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This document provides the evacuation time estimates and other pertinent demographic data utilized in WNP-2's Emergency Plan (FSAR, Chapter 13.3). As part of the annual review of the WNP-2 Emergency Plan, population and roadway changes within the Ten-Mile Plume Exposure" Pathway Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) are assessed to determine if the potential exists to require modification of the evacuation routes or times.
The need for this current revision was based on guidance in NUREG/CR-4831; "...As a general rule, a 10 percent increase in population indicates a need to check evacuation times. An initial assessment would involve determining whether growth had taken place in areas constrained by roadway capacity...". Recent surveys indicated that a 25% increase of population in the emergency planning zone had occurred. Hence, this evacuation time estimate study was performed.
Data analysis in this revision was accomplished using the latest release of the Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System (OREMS), version 2.0a, which is recommended by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
To meet future review requirements the empirical data solicited during the annual 25%
population poll of EBS radio holders will be examined. Further revisions will primarily be based on this annual review, however, revisions are not expected to be needed any more frequently than on a four year basis. By that time approximately 100% of the Ten-Mile EPZ will have been routinely surveyed and a decision will be made as to whether a reassessment will be necessary.
The location of WNP-2 on the Hanford Reservation assures a relatively low number of residents within the Ten-Mile EPZ. Also the regional climate affords protection from extreme weather conditions which would require a caveate to be added to the estimates for such severe natural phenomenon as a blizzard or hurricane. Thus because of the low population and the mild climate, the time it is calculated to take to evacuate the entire Ten-Mile EPZ in normal conditions is 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 15 minutes and for adverse conditions it is 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 30 minutes, which is much shorter than some plants that have a higher population density and who suffer from extremes in weather conditions. Figure 3, Evacuation Routes - Access Control Points Traffic Control Points and Assistance Centers, and Table 6, Summa of Results of Evacuation Times Anal sis, presents the key findings and data useful in developing and implementing public protective actions for the WNP-2 site.
EVA CVA77. $ 7VIW: IEP
)f e
I r ~ 'I WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuahon Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 'R~ I
~
I' SECTION I. - INTRODUCTION Even though the likelihood of an accident severe enough to warrant extensive off-site protective action is very small, should one occur, recommendations to shelter or evacuate large numbers of people could be significantly impeded by a lack of advance planning. Thus each nuclear powei: plant in the United States is required to ensure methods are in place to provide for the health and safety of the public in the event of an accident that impacts areas beyond their site boundaries. This study was performed to provide input into this process for the Washington Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2).
A. Site Location & Emer enc Plannin Zone EPZ Washington Public Power Supply System leases 1089 acres of land north of Richland, Washington, on the Hanford Reservation. This land isunder the control of Department of Energy, Richland (DOE-RL). The Supply System's portion is approximately 3 miles west of the Columbia River and 12 miles north of the populated area of Richland. Within the Supply System's exclusion area resides an operating nuclear power plant referred to as WNP-2 or Plant 2. Figure 1 shows the Ten-'Mile Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone Map associated with WNP-2. This Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) is the study area for which these evacuation time estimates have been made.
The DOE-RL is recognized as being responsible for the coordination of a Hanford site-wide evacuation. The Supply System, as company landlord for its specific area, is responsible for internal evacuation needs as well as recommending appropriate evacuation measures for the public in the event of an emergency at WNP-2. This evacuation plan has been discussed with DOE-RL and the Benton/Franklin County Emergency Management Agency emergency planning representatives.
Because of the relative location of WNP-2 to the other DOE facilities on the Hanford Reservation, it is postulated that there would be no impact to the evacuation times of the general public to a Plant 2 emergency should there also be an emergency at one of the DOE facilities at the same time.
EVACUA77.$TV/1V: IEP
~
Evacuation Time Estimate Study v ~
C p
Revision 3 - June 1996 B. General Assum tions The evacuation analysis is based on the following assumptions:
II
~ Initial notification times, both Supply System-to-county and county-to-populace, through the early warning system generally equals a maximum of 30 minutes total (see Section IV.A).
~ No permanent. population resides on the Hanford Reservation.
~ Evacuation is based on general radial dispersion by the populace. In Franklin County, personnel north of the plant will evacuate north toward Mesa/Connell and those south of the plant will evacuate south towards Kennewick/Pasco.
~ Inner sections would evacuate simultaneously with the outer sections.
~ Initial road vehicle population is free of traffic and set at zero.
~ One hour loading period for all populations, even for site industrial workers (which would normally be much quicker).
~ Occupancy loading was assumed to be 3 persons per vehicle for categories other than transient industrial, schools and the ORV Park.
~ Based on the size of the average household, households will evacuate as a unit, using only one vehicle per family.
~ Schools are part of the general population for purposes of evacuation time estimates.
~ Buses to be used for school evacuation will be dispatched within the one-hour loading time frame.
~ Vehicle occupancy of 35 persons per school bus.
EVACUA 77. STVIW.'eP
t/
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Hme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 (R~=
~ Evacuation is occurring on a weekday with school in session, during months (April-June) when an additional 100 children of migratory agricultural workers are present.
~ Evacuation is occurring during the workday for areas with the high transient worker populations.
~ Evacuation is occurring during the day on a weekend for areas with high numbers of transient recreationists.
~ Evacuation is occurring when WNP-2 and nearby facilities are staffed at fully operational levels.
~ All persons have transportation available to them.
~ Adverse weather conditions reduce both free-flow speeds and roadway capacities by 30% each. (Snow conditions; roads open; side streets passable).
~ Evacuation is occurring at night.
Confirmation time estimates were not calculated in the model but are estimated as a maximum of one hour (see Section V). The calculated evacuation time estimates by the model start at the time of the announcement over the EBS'Emergency Broadcast System) to begin evacuation and runs until the evacuation is complete (last vehicle is out of the Ten-Mile EPZ or at an assembly area).
EBS is currently being phased out and a new nationwide EAS (Emergency Alerting System) is being implemented. The Supply System has elected to maintain the EBS capability for WNP-2 until such time as the residents can be provided with radios that can utilize the new EAS digital signal.
E VACUA 77.$ 7V/1V: IEP 4
E WWP-2 Ten Mile EPZ P
~ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 C. M~h This assessment was completed using the Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System (OREMS). Refer to the OREMS 2.0a users manual for a detailed description of the model.
The OREMS software required developing the Ten-Mile EPZ road network into link-node diagrams as shown in Figure 2. These link-nodes were utilized as evaluation schemes for data handling. The evacuation routes these schemes are depicting are shown on the map in Figure 3. The Ten-Mile EPZ center point is located midway between Washington Nuclear Projects ¹1, ¹2, and ¹4 (WNP-1, -2, -4). This center point is 2800 feet east of WNP-2 and has coordinates of longitude 119'9'18" west, latitude 46'8'19" north.
EVACUA 77. STVIIV:IEP
NNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 SECTION II. - DEMAND ESTIMATION The 10 mile EPZ population for 1996 is presented in Figure 4. This same information is also presented in Tables 1 through 4. Values within the EPZ were updated by data provided by.
the Benton County Department of Emergency Management and Franklin County Department of Emergency Management from their radio survey questionnaires. Additionally, updated data was provided by the DOE-RL or DOE-RL contractors for contractor facilities under DOE-RL jurisdiction on or near the Hanford Site.
A. Permanent Residents Permanent residents included all people residing in the area, but excluded occupants of institutions (schools). The ten-mile radius around the site is shown in Figure 1. In 1996 an estimated 3,044 people were living within the Ten-Mile EPZ. The nearest inhabitants occupy farms which are located east of the Columbia River and are thinly spread through the EPZ. There are no permanent residents located within three miles of the site. Only about 274 persons reside between the three-mile and the five-mile radii; these are all located east of the Columbia River.
Of the 3,044 people residing in the Ten-Mile EPZ, about 2,186 live in Franklin County and about 858 in Benton County. None of the residents live in incorporated cities.
I There are no significant changes in land use expected in Franklin County over the next several years and, as it is currently irrigated to about the maximum amount practicable, little population increase is foreseen. No significant change in land use on the Hanford Reservation is expected, and no foreseeable population will reside there. Over the next several years the Horn Rapids area in Benton County is predicted to steadily grow in population. Consequently, population assessments should include this area to ensure that proper steps are taken to assess their evacuation needs.
A partial survey (24 percent) of the permanent residents within the Ten-Mile EPZ indicated that all of those surveyed had transportation available to them. Transportation was via their own private vehicles, with neighbors providing an alternate means. The survey
0 I WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ W cP ~
~ Evacuation mme Estimate Study fw
. Revision 3- June 1996 I
-'~
F was performed by the Benton County Department of Emergency Management and validated by the Benton/Franklin Government Conference.. During the annual 25% survey of the EPZ population, residents are queried about needing assistance during evacuation. The small number that answer yes are listed in the Benton/Franklin Emergency Operations Center (EOC) so that assistance may be immediately provided. In addition, the public information brochure and EPZ calendars provides telephone numbers for points of contact for those persons needing transportation assistance during an emergency. Also, the Benton and Franklin Counties Fixed Nuclear Facili Emer enc Res onse Plan contains a procedure whereby, through a memorandum of understanding, the school administrations will provide school buses for general and specific evacuation purposes. For purposes of this study, it is therefore assumed that all permanent residents of the Ten-Mile EPZ have transportation available to them.
B. Transient Po ulation The transient population is divided into three main subgroups: 1) industrial employees, 2) migratory agricultural workers, and 3) recreationists. Figure 5 illustrates this population location graphically.
- 1. Industrial Em lo ees Industrial employees in the Ten-Mile EPZ total 7,926. Most are located in Benton County and form the main population to be evacuated in Benton County.
About 11 percent of the industrial employees work at the WNP-2 site.
Industrial employment in the Ten-Mile EPZ includes:
WNP-2 Plant (5/96 Operational Day Shift) 728 "
WNP-1 (5/96 Supply System and Non Supply Personnel) 27 BPA Ashe Substation (5/96) 10 WNP-2 Plant Engineering Center (5/96) 246 WNP-2 Plant Support Facility (5/96) 122 DOE 400 Area, Fast Flux Test Facility (5/96) 454 Siemens Power Corporation (5/96) 800 DOE 300 Area (5/96) 1,671 DOE 3000 Area, contractors in Port of Benton area (5/96) 2,896 Pacific Northwest National Laborato 5/96 972 Total 7,926 FVACUA ii.STUllV:lEP
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~
Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 tl The majority of these employees work days but there may be some shift workers in the DOE-RL figures. Credit is not deducted from the population values due to emergency personnel remaining in place. Therefore, the planning figure of 7,926 to be evacuated is conservatively high.
2.. Mi rato A ricultural Workers There may be up to approximately 4,244 migratory farm workers in the Ten-Mile EPZ. This figure may be high due to the possibility of double counting during the different harvest periods. The peak season for these workers is May and June; the next highest employment season is during the fall harvest. These workers consist of both permanent and temporary residents of the Tri-Cities area, some living within the Ten-Mile EPZ. The numbers shown on Figure 5 and Table 2 reflect their work locations in Franklin County within the Ten-Mile EPZ, not their residences. Most migrants who work in the Ten-Mile EPZ live in Pasco. The number of migrants livmg in the E PZ is minimal based on surveys in the area.
- 3. Recreationists Recreationists, consisting of hunters, fishermen, and boaters, enjoy activities mainly along the east bank of the Columbia river. The primary fishing season is from June through November; the main hunting season being October through January. The heaviest use of the area by recreationists is on weekends and holidays in the early morning hours. On the average, 52 fishermen and 80 hunters are present in Franklin County during the weekdays. This increases to about'55 fishermen and 200 hunters on weekends and holidays. Recreationists also use the Yakima River with an estimated maximum of 42 at any'time in this area. During peak fishing or hunting times, up to 1,275 fishing and hunting recreationists may be located within the Ten-Mile Emergency Planning Zone. Of these, 1,233 are assigned to Franklin County and 42 to Benton County.
EVACUAT/. STUIW: I EP
0 lb
M ~
Ijs ~ !
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ ~ cP' Evacuation Time Estimate Study l Revision 3 - June 1996
~ ~
I The main concentration of recreationists consists of fishermen located just south of the Ringold Fish Hatchery spillway on the Franklin County side of the Columbia River. Hunting consists of both water fowl, hunted at the Wahluke Hunting Area on the Franklin County side of the Columbia River, and upland game birds, hunted inland on the farm land of Franklin County. Up to 600 recreationists may be located around the Ringold Fish Hatchery and the Wahluke Hunting Area and the rest distributed inland.
An additional recreation attraction is in the south section of the Ten-Mile Emergency Planning Zone in Benton County as an Off-Road Vehicle Park (ORV).
As many as 1,500 participants and spectators may be present during an event. Thus, a maximum total of 2,775 recreationists may be located within the Ten-Mile Emergency Planning Zone. Additional provisions have been made for the Horn Rapids housing development and golf course.
An automobile occupancy factor of 3, the same as used for the transient industrial population, permanent residents and non-industrial transients, was used for most recreationists, except for the ORV Park where a factor of 2 was utilized.
C. S ecial Facili Po ulation There are no individuals within the Ten-Mile EPZ confined to institutions such as hospitals, nursing homes, or penal institutions. There are three schools all in sector 2; the Edwin Markham Elementary School, the County Haven Academy, and the Country Christian Center, with a total population of approximately 565 (students and faculty).
Although most of those live within the Ten-Mile EPZ, the total amount was added to the general population for this study. Buses which would be used for the evacuation are located at the district bus lot in north Pasco.
%9 WlVP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 D. Emer enc Plannin Zone Sub-Areas and Sectors For assimilation of data and ease of determining protective action scenarios, the Ten-Mile EPZ was broken down into sub-areas and sectors. The sectors are the four divisions identified on Figure 1 that separate the area within the 2 to 10-mile radius for ease of protective action recommendation decision-making purposes. The sub-areas considered in this study were:
Radius Area 0-2 miles entire circumference 0-5 miles four approximately 90'ectors 0-10 miles four approximately 90'ectors 0-10 miles entire EPZ The 2-mile radius was not subdivided because it contains no residential population and the only general populations are industrial transients all working in sector 3, on contiguous Supply System properties. Only three of the four sectors were examined because the fourth sector, entirely on the Hanford Reservation, contains no residential, transient nor special populations. These sectors are numbered 1 through 4 and are graphically shown on Figures 1 and 3. The Columbia River, as a natural border between Benton and Franklin Counties, was used to form the division between sector 2 and sector 3. Franklin County was divided, approximately in half, as it was assumed that those north of the plant location would evacuate north toward Mesa/Connell and those in the opposite direction, south towards Pasco.
When making time estimates for the portions of outer sectors, it was modeled that the inner portions of the sector were being simultaneously evacuated.
EVACUA77.$ TVliV:lEP 10
d stan 4 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~
Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 SECTION III. - TRAFFIC CAPACITY Figure 3 illustrates the evacuation routes, access control points, traffic control points, and assistance centers for the Hanford Site. These routes have been designated as primary, and secondary, based on discussion with local traffic and emergency planning officials. These routes were identified as those over which the endangered population could be most expeditiously evacuated to the centers where they may be assisted.
In choosing the traffic flow direction for the computer model, as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, populations were evacuated toward the closest primary, secondary or additional secondary road in decreasing priority that was headed radially away from the plant. The analyses were simplified due to the rural area and low population values.
A. Evacuation Roadwa Networks Sector 1 - All Traffic The primary evacuation route is Russell Road, east to old State Road 17, and north into Mesa. From Mesa, evacuees may continue by:
~ Taking State Highway 17 north to Hendricks, then east on Hendricks Road to Connell.
~ Taking U.S. Highway 395 northeast to Connell.
~ Taking U.S. Highway 395 south to Pasco.
The secondary evacuation route is Route 170 east through Basin City to Mesa.
Additional Secondary Evacuation Routes are:
II Mountain Vista Road/Hollingsworth Road IQamath Road Ironwood Road Ringold Road Taylor Flats Road EVA CUB T7.$ 7VIW: IEP
0, tl
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ W crt'
~
Evacuation Hme Estimate Study I i ~
C Revision 3 - June 1996 Sector 2 - All Traffic The primary evacuation route is Eltopia West Road to Glade North Road then south towards Pasco or east to Eltopia and Highway 395. Additional Secondary Evacuation.
Routes are:
Elm Road Sagemoor Road Road 68 Taylor FlaL~ Road Sector 3 - Residential Traffic
'he primary evacuation route for the residents in this section is Harrington Road and Yakima River Drive or Grosscup Road, to Van Giesen and then west and south to Benton City via SR 224, then to Kiona-Benton Middle School.
The primary route for the residents of the Horn Rapids community is south and east on highway 240 to Van Giesen, then west and south on SR 224 to Benton City.
Some residents may travel to the assistance center at Isaac Stevens Middle School rather than traveling to Benton City..
The advantage of this route is that it provides direct movement from the Ten-Mile EPZ for residents and would avoid the traffic congestion created by industrial transients.
Secondary Evacuation Routes are:
Highway 240 (either towards Benton City or Richland). This route's main disadvantage is that it initially leads deeper into the Ten-Mile EPZ.
Van Giesen (towards Richland). This route's main disadvantage is that it leads directly into Highway 240 Bypass across traffic created by industrial. transients.
EVACUA Tl. STVIW: IEP 12
O.
i/Q(
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study ~ I
. Revision 3- June 1996 5C>>, I Sector 3 - Transient Traffic Two primary transient evacuation routes exist for this area - George Washington Way and Stevens Drive.
A portion of the normal daily traffic coming from the Hanford Reservation routinely uses Stevens Drive to the Richland Bypass Highway 240, and on to Highway 240/12 to Kennewick. The other often utilized route into Kennewick is George Washington Way south to the Richland Bypass Highway 240, and to Highway 240/12. These same routes would be used during an emergency evacuation.
Secondary Evacuation Routes are:
Highway 240 (toward Richland or Yakima) ~
Horn Rapids west to Highway 240, then northwest on Highway 240 to SR 225 then south on SR 225 to Kiona-Benton middle school (Seimens Power Corporation recommended to evacuate this direction to optimize evacuation time.)
Van Giesen (towards Benton City).
North on Route 4 South via the Wye Barricade then either north on Route 2 South or northwest on Route 4 south towards Yakima for WNP-1 and 2 and FFTF transients (possibly used if winds are from northeast to southwest with release imminent or occurring).
FFTF Access Route west to Route 10 south, south on SR 225 to Benton City, (FFTF recommended to evacuate this direction vs. east to Route 4 South to optimize evacuation time.)
B. Roadwa Se ment Characteristics Table 5 is page 1 of a 7 page report which lists the link-node characteristics used by the OREMS software for all roadway segments plotted in the evacuation assessment. Only page 1 is shown due to the inability of most individuals to interpret the data, however, the full report will remain on file for future reference and documentation purposes.
I EVACUA Tl. STVIW: IEP 13
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 In the congested traffic environment which is characteristic of an evacuation process, travel time on a roadway section is, to a large extent, determined by the capacity of that section. Roadway capacities were based upon the type of roadway considered and the presence of traffic control. The following per-lane capacities were used:
Roadway Per-lane
~TB ~Ci h/h Freeway 1800 Arterial/Rural Road 1500 Local Street 1200 This study also required a set of baseline conditions. Included in these conditions is an assumed one-hour loading period. This loading period is considered to be a conservative estimate and includes preparation times.
C. Assistance Centers Emergency Worker/Assistance Centers (EWACs) have been selected by local emergency planning officials. Criteria for selection included that these locations be at least 15 miles from the plant, in the path of normal travel, having adequate facilities, and readily II available. As indicated by the name, these facilities can be used by Emergency Workers as well as the evacuating members of the general public.
Residents evacuated from the Ten-Mile EPZ would be directed to the centers for registration and communicating with family or friends, first aid if needed, radiation monitoring and decontamination if needed, beverages, snacks and temporary lodging or assistance in obtaining meals and commercial lodging, social services and organized activities, and to receive updated information about the event.
The EWACs or Assistance Centers are arranged to accept evacuee flow from the evacuation "Sectors" indicated on Figure 1. There are four of them indicated in the figure by the large numbers 1 through 4 encased in circles. "
EVACUA 77. $ 7VIW:IEP 14
t, 0
0
ti WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation lee Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 The Assistance Centers are associated with the evacuation sectors as shown below.
Sector 1
~ Connell High School, Connell This facility could be used as an assistance center for the northern area. The Connell High School is approximately 28 miles from the Hanford site. Adequate facilities and parking are available.
Sector 2 Isaac Stevens Junior High School, Pasco Isaac Stevens Junior High School, located at 1120 North 22nd, Pasco, can be used as an assistant center for evacuees.
Sector 3
~ Kiona-Benton Middle School, District No. 52, Benton City The school, located at 913 Horn Drive, can serve as an assistance center for evacuees. The school is situated in Benton City, approximately 16 miles from the Hanford site.
Sector 4 does not have an Assistance Center since the entire area of Sector 4 is government land known as the Hanford Reservation which is controlled by DOE-RL. No private home ownership or business exists in this area.
15
e 5H WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ
~
Evacuation 17me Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996
~ ~
SECTION IV. - ANALYSIS OF EVACUATION TIMES A. Time Estimates The Supply System has provided an early warning system capable of notifying the public within the Ten-Mile EPZ to take protective measures during an emergency. The early warning system includes EBS tone alert radios for all permanent residents within the Ten-Mile EPZ and a system of sirens located along the Yakima and Columbia Rivers, and near the Horn Rapids development tract and park, for notification of transient populations in those areas.
The early warning system was designed to enable the county to notify the public within 15 minutes from the time the decision to evacuate is made by county officials. The Supply System likewise has established procedures to notify the county officials within 15 minutes of an incident which would require protective actions to be taken by the public.
Thus a total of 30 minutes was assumed to elapse during the notification of the general public within the Ten-Mile EPZ.
After a review and update of current population statistics and the completion of the traffic/roadway assignments, the simulation studies were begun. Three scenarios were developed for presentation:
Case 1: Daytime, one-hour loading period.
Case 2: Nighttime, one-hour loading period.
Case 3: Adverse weather, one-hour loading period.
Table 6 presents the evacuation time estimate results for these three case studies.
As shown in this table, during normal weather conditions it is estimated that it will take approximately 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 15 minutes to evacuate the populous within the Ten-Mile EPZ.
EVACUA77.$7VIW:IEP
O.
I' L
8'NP-2 Ten Mile EPZ gled l
~
Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996
>hF
B. Adverse Weather Severe weather conditions such as blizzards, heavy rain storms, flooding, fog, or high winds could hamper evacuation. However, historical records for the WNP-2 site indicate that severe conditions of this nature have rarely occurred in the past. Table 6 presents evacuation time estimates under three conditions; weekday daytime, nighttime and adverse weather. This table indicates that during adverse weather conditions it is estimated that it will take. approximately 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 30 minutes to evacuate the populous within the Ten-Mile EPZ.
Because of the effect of weather on the capacity of roadway and the fact that capacity is a controlling factor in deriving evacuation times, it is necessary to adjust capacity figures to represent estimated road conditions during adverse weather. Based on limited empirical, data, weather conditions such as heavy rain reduce the values of capacity for the highways utilized as evacuation routes by approximately 20 percent. For adverse conditions during the winter months, we have estimated capacity reductions and free-flow speed reductions of 30 percent each, relative to normal weather conditions.
It was assumed that only a few of the secondary routes were utilized at any one time.
Inclusion of more of these secondary routes in the computer model could lower the evacuation time estimate.
EVACUA JX STUIIN:IEP 17
0 L
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study T
> ~
Revision 3 - June 1996 '
SECTION V. - OTHER RE UIREMENTS A. Recommendations It was assumed that the road network was initially free of traffic in the areas of the evacuation. This would generally be true. If a Supply System evacuation was required during a shift change at DOE-RL facilities on the Hanford Site but outside the 10 Mile EPZ, this could place many additional vehicles vying for space on Route 4 south. DOE-RL has agreed not to send transient vehicles into the Ten-Mile EPZ during a Supply System evacuation situation. Veh:.cles could be re-directed at the Wye Barricade (or sooner).
FFTF - For optimum time benefit, it is recommended that FFTF be directed to evacuate west to Route 10 South verses accessing Route 4 South. This decreases the loading through the 300 Area.
DOE-RL 300 Area - Traffic control strategy suggests recommending an officer be stationed at the intersection of Route 4 South and the Main 300 Area Parking outlet onto Route 4 South to control traffic flow. DOE-RL has been advised to balance outlet traffic volume going onto Stevens Drive (Route 4 South) with traffic south out of the 300 Area onto George Washington Way.
~ Siemens Power Corporation - To further decrease loading on Stevens Drive, it is recommended that this facility be directed to evacuate west on Horn Rapids and then back into Richland by heading southeast on Highway 240 versus accessing Stevens Drive.
~ DOE-RL 3000 Area - Battelle and other DOE-RL contractors between George Washington Way and Stevens Drive should be directed to evacuate using Stevens Drive. All other contractors that lie east of George Washington Way are directed EVACUEE to evacuate using George Washington Way. The stationing of a traffic control officer is suggested at the Battelle Boulevard and Stevens Drive intersection.
Tl. SlVIW:IEP 18
~,
t!' ~
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 During the evacuation process, non-emergency vehicles should be restricted from entering the Ten-Mile EPZ. This can be accomplished with the assistance of State and local law enforcement officials who will establish traffic control points along the effected areas perimeter. This function can be coordinated with the County Emergency Operations Center to ensure the appropriate areas are controlled. All of the assigned traffic control points will function to some extent as access control points to restrict unauthorized entry into the evacuated a'reas. Traffic control points along the evacuation routes will also serve to direct and aid the flow of outgoing evacuation traffic. Persons who staff the traffic control points will be considered emergency workers and should be trained and equipped to handle radiological emergency situations.
The evacuation routes and traffic/access control point concept as indicated in Figure 3 have not changed as a result of this study, hence the current plans, implementing procedures, and public education documents have the correct traffic flow guidance. The traffic/access control points shown in Figure 3 are layed out in a typical pattern for the Ten-Mile EPZ. The actual points utilized by local officials are identified in the Benton and Franklin County Radiological Emergency Preparedness Implementing Procedures.
B. Review of Stud b State and Local Officials The prior revision to this study was reviewed by the principal state and local officials involved in emergency response for the site. Their comments were solicited and incorporated into the final draft. The methodology and evacuate routes were not modified as a result of this latest study and thus a formal review was not performed on this revision.
However, the Supply System would like to thank the Planners at both Benton and Franklin County for their extensive assistance, including acquisition 'and support of the OREMS software, in helping to complete this report.
EVACUA TI.STUIN:IEP 19
O.
E, I
I ji WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 W ~
4% r ZL I
t SECTION VI. - REFERENCES
- 1. WNP-2 Emer enc Plan, Revision 16, November 1995.
- 2. Benton and Franklin Coun Radiolo ical Emer enc Pre aredness Im lementin
~proee ores, 19rr5, Criteria for Pre aration and Evaluation of Radiolo ical Emer enc Res onse Plans and Pre aration and Pre aredness in Su ort of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, November 1980, Appendix 4.
- 4. Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System (OREMS) User's Manual.
e
- 5. WNP-2 Environmental Re *ort-0 eratin License Sta e Amendment ¹5, July 17, 1981.
- 6. State of the Art in Evacuation Time Estimate Studies for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-4831, PNL-7776, March 1992.
- 7. Acce tance Criteria for Evacuation Plans, FEMA Guidance Memoranda GM-21.
- 8. Plannin Conce ts And Decision Criteria For Shelterin And Evacuation in a Nuclear Power Plant Emer enc, AIF/NESP-031, June 1985.
- 9. Identification and Anal sis of Factors Affectin Emer enc Evacuations, NUMARC/NESP-004, February 1989.
EVrI CUA TI.STUIW:IEP 20
0 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuahon Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 APPENDICES Figure 1 Ten-Mile Emergency Planning Zone Figure 2 Link Node Maps Figure 3 Evacuation Routes - Access Control Points, Traffic Control Points, and Assistance Centers Figure 4 Total Population in the Ten-Mile EPZ, Broken Down into Classifications Figure 5 Distribution of Transient Population in the Ten-Mile EPZ Figure 6 series Percent Evacuated vs. Time for Various Populations and Conditions
("S Curves" for, Ten-Mile EPZ) 6A Permanent Population - Normal Conditions 6B Permanent Population - Adverse Conditions 6C General Population - Normal Conditions 6D General Population - Adverse Conditions Table 1 Permanent Population Distribution Table 2 Transient Population Distribution Table 3 Special Facility Population Distribution Table 4 Maximum Population Distribution Table 5 Roadway Characteristics Table 6 Summary'of Results of Evacuation Time Analysis Resource 1 Example Computer Run EVACUA TI.STVIIV:IEP 21
0 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study l ~
Revision 3 - June 1996 TEN-MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE flrl )catt'>>
. 't ). I r
Vthnl."I~Ij 4 ~
)ti
~
9 ~
3~
."-Zl
~
I m
"'@/)34 I r 'a~LI{P'4WIE 395 II c
IO1>> ~
4 orl
!{ Ir-. ~ ~ OOOO I~ t)t
~ wt L ~
{t WSQCC9or I)
) ~ OO)OVOI IO C li+
~ ~
~ rotor
'O' Or
~'3 F7~~,)~'j
~
~ I
'CIroy' I oo'vv
~ ~r O OVIOIIO r
~ r4 I I9 a ~ ~
Ia ,c ~
w jvlt)la
~ ~
g
~ ~ II IOIIII~%
, i)r ~ loot)to ~ ~ IOOOIOOOI&OIHOI i-v ~
~ IOOO
%Mt'C)al , I~ i& st
, It, ~ \
~ OII oooo ~
~ a 9 ~ tt
~
~
O j+r ~ OOIIVO Ih ~
vo ro tg39lI sanford "'
'~Stte-'.-.
3
//f ~ I J c ~
~
~
v
~
~
~
2 '.
/m 9U".+ ~t F a9~ ~ r LCOC)IO ~ ~
lt4
~ ~
WWIVOOOOO~
~ IIIOOO
~ OOIOOOI I Oatem~
4 ~~IOOI eema
~ O"
I..W{
M~Z~ ~ t~ i tw'tI
~ I
~
9
,!Iij
~ O ~
~ I OOOO Q *Oooo~mmatlo
(
'P 3 c.'i4 'c
't4
)oooo IOO .I Qa eve
)ca)a
en
~ v
~
.{
- )It'I>>
~+ 395
.4
~~g on "..,
.P
~ I rl>> C)f)
'i.hQ-,";- '
~
)I i I Iac .4>{' '!)H~iian'Gc
~v Ia .) ~, OI.)O 1 8tt EVACUA77.$ TVIIV: c {EP 22
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 LINK NODE MAPS Trip/Path Bun Controls IP 9 ut Qls I 0 tlons EVACUA 77.$ TUIW:1EP 23
WWP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June I996
~ ~
FIGURE 3 EVACUATIONROUTES Access Control Points Traffic Control Points and Assistance Centers
~awA c ACUOOLIIIOOTOT I tt AIBA
~I /
~ l>>Ik elool 10 ml 5ml II AD Zl O 30L Hanford ~ VT t Site b Ot Franklin Tvetttc ~ ecceee Coeteol 'OL etc .
County t- 595 Pi>>,l e ~ OCIITOU CITT
~EWA C
'Qe 'veer ..
~EWA C Kloel ~ tetoe >> I>> ISAAC t I 1 Ue'e tceooLp leooLC LTTLU ~ TLVLet Olkovt eeet t t UIOCLC 12 ~ I U.~~
~ ALCO Benton County EVACUA TT.STUIWTLEP 1 24
O.
0
,I~
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study '
Revision 3 - June 1996 FIGURE 4 TOTAL POPULATION IN THE TEN-MILE EPZ Broken Down Into Classifications 337 NNE 1206 0
NW CD NE ce
~264 1142 ENE
~232 I
41 0 W 10 MILES RQ 2 MAES 5
Qg ~37
~24 gg I gg ~261 415
~4 ESE E 1415 1266
~6 gg
~550 ggi Zl
~592 9
QS 1725 QT SSE S 5806 1179
)7 525 TOTAL SEOMENT ILOIPIAATION 0 TO 10 MILES POPOIAllOS TOTALS. ~PSSLIASTIIT POPULATION TOTALS ~ ~gggg CUMULATIVE ROiO ROIO MILES TOTAL NKS RIIIO MLLES 7 TOTAL MILES il 42 I 133 02 1133 2.5 25 2312 05 5 10 0.10 5 10 10.775 010 14220 POPULATION TOTALS ~PEC~IA POPULATION TOTALS CUMULATIVE RING TOTAL MILES CUMULATIVE RINO MAES TOTAL MILES RTRQ MILES P 7 7 iI P 7 1133 1133 2.5 2477 3410 5 IO 0 10 5 10 IPL214 0.10 17.424 4707O74 Juno I SOS Roo 14 IIEP EVACIJA 77. STVITVI 25
e8 WlVP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 FIGURE 5 DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIENT POPULATION IN THE TEN-MILE EPZ 38 N 214 NNW NNE 879 NE 868 ENE Cb EQ
>e W 10 hfILES 5 MILES 2 1Aa ES Q E 1113 ESE WSW Q 506 Cb 471 SW o 828 5030 SE 1003 SSW SSE 1648 S 5618 878 865 Industnal Employees C9 Migratory Agriculture Workers I
Recreationists e 707474 May 1995 ad te EVA CUATI.STVIW:IEP 26
O.
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 I. ~
FIGURE 6A PERMANENT POPULATION - NORMAL CONDITIONS 70 CD V
60 V
CJ lLJ 40 cC)
U CL 30 10 0
g g g Q g g g g n o e g n g Time (min)
EVA CUA77.$ TVIN:IEP 27
F
.L WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Hme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 FIGURE 6B PERMANENT POPULATION - ADVERSE CONDITIONS Vl 70 O
O EU ID O
I L
0 30 10 0
O R 8 8 8 8 I-Time (min)
EVACUR Tl. STVIW: IEP 28
l/
WlVP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 r ~
g Tc FIGURE 6C GENERAL POPULATION - NORMAL CONDITIONS Vl 70 -'
I 6$
0 Lll 40 Cl O
S 30 Q
0 co R 8 R 0 4 8 co 8 co P c co co 8 I8 8 g g cci g g Q g Time (min)
E VACUA TI.$71/IW:c IEP 29
ll O.
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June l996 Tb y I
FIGURE 6D GENERAL POPULATION - ADVERSE CONDITIONS
,(~4+W+~N%<N<@%NS8j+@@PS&cg&~P~P@C,,,+(i~~~,~(~>>, xqP~q@P(g,gPPgeoy~y 70 O
Cl 60 U
CT LLI 40 L
~ so 10 0
O Ill O R 'A R Ã 0 '4 8 5 8 5 R Ã 8 s R s 8 3 p R Lt' Ã 0 4 R Time (min)
EVA CUR TT. STVIW. IEP 30
~,
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation 77me Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 TABLE 1 PERMANENT POPULATION DISTRIBUTION WNP-2 ETE STUDY DATA SECTORS - MILES 0-2 Miles 2-5 Miles 5-10 Miles Sector Totals 0 0 48 48 0 1 121 122 0 45 264 309 ENE 0 41 232 273 E 37 261 298 ESE 0 24 321 345 SE 0 11 592 603 SSE 183 188 S 300 300 SSW 0 550 550 SW 0 0 8 8 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RADIUS TOTALS 0 164 2880 EPZ TOTAL EVh CUh Tl. STVIW: IEP 31
0 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 4~4 I TABLE 2 TRANSIENT POPULATION DISTRIBUTION W%'-2 ETE STUDY DATA SECTORS - MILES 0-2 Miles 2-5 Miles 5-10 Miles Sector Totals N 0 0 38 38 NNE 100 114 214 NE 0 625 254 879 ENE 0 678 190 868 E 0 341 772 . 1113 ESE 27 87 392 SE 0 27 976 1003 SSE 0 0 5618 5618 S 0 0 878 '78 SSW 122 0 1526 1648 SW 0 454 17 ~
471 WSW 0 0 0 0 W 0 Wl'AV 984 0 0 984 NW 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 RADIUS TOTALS 1133 2312 10775 3445'PZ TOTAL 14220
'-5 Miles Accumulated Total EVACUA77. STUllV:IEP 32
O.
~1
hN WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 TABLE 3 SPECIAL FACILITY POPULATION DISTRIBUTION WNP-2 ETE STUDY DATA SECTORS - MILES 0-2 Miles 2-5 Miles 5-10 Miles Sector Totals N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 17 18 ENE 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 ESE SE SSE SSW SW S
0 0
0 0
0 0
'. 0 0
0 0
0 ',
415 119 0
0 1
415 119 0
1 0
WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RADIUS TOTALS 0 EPZ TOTAL 565 EVACVATl. STVIW: 1FP 33
e I4 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ ~W o ~
Evacuation Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June l996 TABLE 4 MAXIMUMPOPULATION DISTRIBUTION WNP-2 ETE STUDY DATA SECTORS - MILES 0-2 Miles 2-5 Miles 5-10 Miles Sector Totals N 0 0 86 86 NNE 0 101 235 336 NE 0 671 535 1206 ENE 0 719 422 1141 E 0 378 1037 . 1415 ESE 27 ill 1128 1266 SE 0 38 1687 1725 SSE ' 5801 5806 S 0 0 1179 1179 SSW 122 0 2082 2204 SW 0 454 25 479 WSW 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 WNW 984 0 0 984 NW 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 RADIUS TOTALS 1133 2477 14217 3610'PZ TOTAL 17827
'-5 Miles Accumulated Total EVACUATI.SlVIW:lEP 34
t/ 'q WlVP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation Time Estimate Study 1
! ~
I Revision 3 - June 1996 I TABLE 5 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS OREMS 2 ' 00 Kevin Galioto 96Washington Public, Power 01 10 100 5 22 0 1200 2
'2 150 150 150 03 60 04 5 05 000000000 06 8001 00 0000000, 7 0 2 25 24 30 ll 11 6 400, 2 1 5 100 2 25 24 30 1 11 4 160 2 25 24 30 1 11 3 360 2 25 24 30 1 11 799 25 24 30 1 11 2
1 761 2
2 8003 10 1
25 24 55 1 ll 11 8000 11 0 2 11 10 282 2 9 25 24 55 1 11 10 9 222 2 8 25 24 55 1 11 9 8 701 2 25 24 55 1 11 8 2 500 2 1 25 24 55 1 11 8005 13 0 2 14 11 13 14 800 2 12 25 24 30 1 11 14 12 220 2 8 25 24 55 1 11, 12 8 300 2 2 25 24 55 1 11 8002 16 0 2 15 11 16 15 700 2 14 25 24 30 1 11 15 14 200 2 12 25 24 30 1 11 32 35 84'8 2 36 38 25 24 30 1 11 35 128 4 55 25 24 55 1 11 38 55 310 2 54 25 24 55 1 11 35 36 161 4 37 25 24 55 1 11 52 36 84 2 25 24 30 1 11 52 55 179 2 54 25 24 30 1 11 36 37 422 2 66 25 24 55 1 11 39 41 151 4 42 25 24 35 1 11 39 40 139 4 41 45 25 24 55 1 11 53 40 99 2 41 45 25 24 30 1 11 40 41 60 2 42 25 24 30 1 11 53 51 221 2 45 50 25 24 30 1 11 51 50 82 2 49 25 24 30 1 11 50 49 82 2 48 25 24 30 1 11 54 51 287 2 50 45 25 24 55 1 11 51 45 413 2 43 44 '25 24 55 1 11 40 45 241 4 43 44 25 24 35 1 11 41 42 381 4 43 25 24 35 1 11 42 43 60 44 25 24 30 11 43 45 44 43 140 60 2
2 2
46 44 25 25 24 24 30 30 1
1 1
ll 11 45 44 152 2 46 25 24 30 1 11 49 48 102 2 46 25 24 30 1 11 47 48 84 2 46 25 24 35 1 11 44 46 260 2 57 25 24 55 1 11 48 46 197 2 57 25 24 35 1 11 8009 51 0 2 45 50 11 8013 53 0 2 51 40 11 37 66 60 2 39 25 24 55 1 11 66 39 60 4 41 40 25 24 55 1 11 8012 66 0 2 39 11 EVACUA17.$TUIW:IEP 35
rrr4 WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuatr'on Time Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 TABLE 6
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS OF EVACUATIONTIME ANALYSIS Total Areas Within 5 Miles Areas Within 10 Miles DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 Total 1 2 3 Total 2 Miles Permanent Population - 124 40 - 164 1050 1136 858 3044 Perm. Population Vehicles - 41 13 - . 54 347 380 286 1013 Transient Population 1133 1744 141 1560 3445 1571 7154 3931 12656 Trans; Population Vehicles 971 581 64 964 2580 5763 2636 2944 6102 General Population 1133 1868 181 1560 3609 2621 8290 4789 15700 Total Vehicles 971 622 77 964 2634 870 3016 3230 7115, Notification Time (Mi~~) 15 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Permanent Population Evac.
Time - Normal Conditions 1 00 1 00 - 1 00 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 (Hours: Minutes)
General Population Evac.
I Time - Normal Conditions 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:30 1:30 1:30 1:20 2:15 2:15 (Hours; Minutes)
Permanent Population Evac.
Time - Adverse Conditions - 1:00 1:00 - 1:00 1:30 1:30 1:30 I:30 (Hours: Minutes)
General Population Evac.
Time - Adverse Conditions 1:30 1:00 1:00 2:00 2:00 1:30 1:30 2:30 2:30 (Hours: Minutes)
Confirmation Time (Mi~~) 30 60 60 60 60,60 60 60 60 EVACUATT.STVIWrtEP r 36 r
4, r
'll
4/4(
WNP-2 Ten Mile EPZ Evacuation mme Estimate Study Revision 3 - June 1996 RESOURCE 1 EXAMPLE COMPUTER RUN The following is a copy of a computer run produced by the Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System (OREMS) software which was used to calculate the time estimates. This is provided for general review and informational purposes only.
EVACUATI.StVIW:IEP 37
0
OSEQ ¹; + 1~ 2 t~+~+ t 5+ t7+8 Ei 51:2001 4 3 52:8001 10008004 8005 8002 179 53:8003 12008005 8004 8002 179 54:2001 808004 8002 179 55:08 210 56: 130 52 57: 170 58: 0000000000000 177 175 59:2001 4 3 60:8001 2008004 8005 8002 179 61:8003 10008005 8004 8002 179 62:2001 s 18004 8002 179 63:
OSEQ.¹:
1 1 1 + 2 +~+~ 5 +~210 7 8 1 EVACUATIONSIMULATIONMODEL DEVELOPED FOR FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCY OREMS 2.0 Alpha Casu StUdy: Trip Dist. + Traffic Assignment + Simulation RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS
' RUN IDENTIFICATION CODE%(0,1) NUMBER 3 RUN TYPE CODE < (1,2,3) TO RUN (SIMUIATION,ASSIGNMENT, BOTH)
,(-1,-2,4) TO CHECK (SIMULATION,ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 INPUT UNITS IF INPUT IS IN(ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT, UNITS CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH)
UNITS 0 1600 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION(HHMM) 900'URATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 900'URATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 2 900'URATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 3 60'ENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL,SECONDS 10'AXIMUMINITIALIZATIONTIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 300 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS
'ALUES ASSERTED BY THE MODEL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS-
~ 1 ~ 10eettottttttttt0011 ~ Ieotteet0 ~ 140 ~ Itttltootoooteollsoooooooootttottotttl ~ otlttt01 ~ 0 ~ 1tottootts10 ~ 00tto ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ ottootttt 1
TIME PERIOD 1- ESIM DATA t
~ 110111001100 ~ 0010011 ~ 01001000II ~ Ott1WtttO ~ 110 ~ i~ 0 ~ iOMIOttIMOttMIHOttt~ JIHAD ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ I~ 0 ~ I~ 0 ~ I~ 00000 ~ 001 ~ 100 ~ 0 ~ J ~ IIIOJO ~ 0 ~ 0101 ~
ESIM LINKS
-LANES- CHANNEL-F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE t LENGTH L PKT,GRD R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED LINK FT I M L L R PCT B23456 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE (8001, 1) Ol 0 200 0 000000 2 3 0 0 0 2.5'.2'/0 0 0
( 1 3) 52800/""
~
210 0 000000 4 0 0 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/ 64 1 0
( 3, 1) 201 0 000000 0 0 2 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/ 64 0 0 3) 52800/'"'8003, Ol 0 200 0 000000 0 1 4 0 0 2.5'.2'/ 0 0 0
( 3, 4) 52800/'"' 21 1 0 000000 2 5 8004 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/ 64 0 0 4, 3) 52800/'"' 21 1 0 000000 0 0 1 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/ 64 0 0 4, 5) 52800/'"' 200 0 000000 0 8005 0 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/ 64 0 0 5, 4) 52800/-" 21 1 0 000000 8004 3 2 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/ 64 0 0
( 4, 2) 52800/'"'00 0 000000 08002 0 0 0 4,0 3.5 40/64 0 0 52800/"" 21 0 000000 58004 3 0 0 4.0 3.5 '40/64 0 0
( 2, 4) 1
( 1, 2) 52800/'"'00 0 000000 8002 0 4 0 0 3.0 2.5 25/40 1 0
'NDICATES A DEFAULT VALUE, ASSIGNED INTERNALLYBY THE MODEL LANE CHANNELIZATION RTOR PEDESTRIAN CODES CODES CODES 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT 2 BUSES ONLY 2 MODERATE 3 CLOSED 3 HEAVY 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR-POOLS+ BUSES ESIM'URNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE POCKET LENGTH (FEET/METERS)
LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL (PCT) (SECS) LEFT RIGHT (8001, 1) 0 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0 0 ~ 0/ 0 Ol 0
( 1, 3) 0 0 0 0 YES NO NO NO 0 0 60/ 18 Ol 0 (3. 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 0/ 0 60/ 18 (8003, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0 0 0/ 0 Ol 0
( 3. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0 6m 18 60/ 18
( 4, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 Ol 0 Ol 0
( 5, 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 Ol 0 0/ 0
( 2. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 1 2)
~ 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 1 FREEWAY SUBNETWORK PARAMETERS RELAXATIONTIME COEFFICIENT 75 SECONDS/MILE OR 46 SECONDS/KM ANTICIPATIONCOEFFICIENT (EE-2) 50 MILES"2/HOUR OR 129 KM"2/HOUR TIME SLICE DURATION 3 SECONDS JAM DENSITY 180 (VEH/LANE4IILE) OR 112 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENTS FOR SPEED-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RELATIONSHIP 1 COEFFICIENT 1 107 (MILES/HOUR) OR 172 (KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 2 -231 (MILES/HOUR) (lANEAILENEH) OR 498 (KM/HOUR) (LANE-KMNEH)
COEFFICIENT 3 215 (MILES/HOUR) (LANE4llLENEH)"2 OR 896 (KM/HOUR) (IANE-KM/VEH)-2 KMNEH)"3 COEFFICIENT 4 -74 (MILES/HOUR) (LANE4llLE/VEH)"3 OR ~ (KM/HOUR) (LANE-RELATIONSHIP 2 COEFFICIENT 1 80 (HOURS/MILE) OR 49 (HOURS/KM)
COEFFICIENT2 474 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE4tllLE/VEH) OR 474(HOURS/KM) (LANE-KM/VEH)
COEFFICIENT 3 491 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE&ILE/VEH)"2 OR .951 (HOURS/KM) (LANE-KM/VEH)"2 COEFFICIENT 4 466 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE4IILE/VEH)' OR 1206 (HOURS/KM) (LANE-KM/VEH)-3 RELATIONSHIP 3 COEFFICIENT 1 25. (VEH/LANE-MILE) OR 16 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENT 2 50. (VEH/LANE-MILE) OR 31 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENT 3 35. (MILES/HOUR) OR 56 (KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 4 40. (MILES/HOUR) OR 64 (KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 5 2. (DIMENSIONLESS) OR 2 (DIMENSIONLESS) j NO TYPE 34 CARD WAS INPUT, ALLVALUES ARE DEFAULTS, ASSIGNED INTERNALLYBY THE MODEL SPECIFIED FIXED-TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES NODE 1 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION, +---------- ----APPROACHES +
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8001 1) ( 3, 1)
~
1 0 100 0 0 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES---------------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 2) ( 1, 2) 1 0 100 5 5 NODE 3 OFFSET 50 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 55 SEC INTERVAL DURATION +-------------- APPROACHES +
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 3) (8003, 3) ( 4, 3) 1 15 27 1 2 3 2 3 5 0 2 0 3 2 4 2 2 2 4 15 27 1 9 2 5 3 5 0 0 2 6 2 4 2 2 2 7 10 18 2 2 3 8 3 5 2 2 0 9 2 4 2 2 2 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +------ --------APPROACHES-------- ------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 3, 4) ( 5, 4) ( 2, 4) 1 0 100 5 5 5 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES---------------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 5) 1 0 100 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 5 STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONALARROW 7 NO TURNS-GREEN THRU ARROW
8 RED WITH LEFTAND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN-GREEN THRU AND RIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES GO R PROTECTED NOGO = NOT PERMITTED PERM < PERMITTED NOT.PROTECTED PROT K PROTECTED STOP < STOP SIGN YLD R YIELD SIGN NODE 1 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION APPROACHES (8001, 1) ( 3, 1)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 YLD YLD YLD NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION APPROACHES (4. 2), (1. 2)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP STOP NODE 3 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET K 50 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH -" 55 SECONDS PHASE DURATION APPROACHES
( 1 3)
~ (8003, 3) ( 4, 3)
LEFTTHRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 20 PROT NOGO NOGO GO 2 20 PROT GO GO NOGO 3 15 NOGO NOGO NOGO GO NODE . 4 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION
( 3, 4) ( 5, 4) ( 2, 4)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP 1
NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION APPROACHES
( 4. 5)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 0-"'ARNING -MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S)-P1 < 0, P2= 4, P3<
3 1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS4F-A-PERSON I VEHICLE)
AUTOS CAR-POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) = 1.0% +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION = 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS < 15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS < 1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL, 1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)= 0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA < 60/100 +
BETA <40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)~ 0 +
(+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT CODE R 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED 0-D TREES 4: ALL OUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 TRIP TABLE FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATE DESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE (8001) 8004 8005. 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 8002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0-"'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~ 8001 0-"'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~ 8004 O'"" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~ 8005 O'"" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 $ 8002 0-"'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~ 8003 O'"- WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 i 2001 1 INTERNAL CENTROIDS CENTROID LINK 2001 ( 4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 2001 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODE/VOLUME
DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 1
~ ~ 111 ~ 10t000tot1410010lt001titt&t110 ~ ~I ottttl~ I~ 0 ~ 0001to ~ 0 ~ 10tto ~ 0 ~ 10tt1 ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ otic ~ ot000tootttt11 ~ ottttt1101 ~ 0 ~ oto ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~
TIME PERIOD 2- ESIM DATA I I
~ 1111 ~ 110 ~ 110010011111100M011001101&11111IttOitO ~ 1 ~ ~ I1100000&1001101I ~ 000 ~ 00 ~ Oi111 ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ i00000 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 1 II I
~ 1 ~ OWO ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 01 ~ 1 ~ ~ 0 I
ESIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL (PCT)
(SECS)
(8001, 1) 0 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0 0
( 1, 3) 0 0 0 0 YES NO NO NO 0 0
( 3, 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 (8003, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0 0
( 3, 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0
( 4, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0
( 5. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0
( 4. 2) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 (2 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0
0 0 0
( 1 2)~ 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0"-'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 0, P2s 4, P3s 3
1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS-OF-A-PERSON / VEHICLE)
AUTOS CAR-POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) s 1.0% +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION s 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS s 15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS s 1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL, 1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)s 0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA s 60/100 +
BETA s40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)= 0 +
(+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT CODE s 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED O.D TREES 4: ALL OUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 TRIP TABLE
FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATE DESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE (8001) 8004 8005 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 8002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0" 'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8001 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8004 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8005 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8002 0-'- WARNING -MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S)- P1 8003 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 2001 1 INTERNALCENTROIDS CENTROID LINK 2001 ( 4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 200'I 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODE/VOLUME DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 oooooooooootoo ~ o ~ oottootttto ~ o ~ ooooootoooootooto ~ otooo ~ ootooo ~ o ~ ootootootoootottto ~ oooooooooototo ~
1totttoooooooo ~ os ooooooooooooto ~ o ~
TIME PERIOD 3- ESIM DATA
~ o ~ o ~ ooo ~ o ~ oooo ~ oooooo ~ oooootoo ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ oto ~ otooooo ~ oooo ~ oo ~ ooooooo ~ ooo ~ ooo ~ o ~ ootttottoooo ~ ooo ~ o ~ \ ~ oooo ~ o ~ oo ~ o ~ ottoto ~ oo ~ o ~ ooooo ~
ESIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE LINK LEFTTHROUGHRIGHTDIAGONAL LEFTTHROUGHRIGHTDIAGONAL (PCT)
(SECS)
(8001, 1) 0 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0 0 (1. 3) 0 0 0 0 YES NO NO NO 0 0
( 3. 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 (8003, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0 0.
( 3. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0
( 4, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0
( 5. 4) 0 0 '0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 0-"'ARNING 3
( 2. 4)
( 1, 2) 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0
YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO
- MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~
0 0 0 0
', P2 ~ '4, P3=
1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS-OF-A-PERSON / VEHICLE)
AUTOS CAR-POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) = 1.0% +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION = 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS -15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS = 1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL, 1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)= 0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA c 60/100 +
BETA ~40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)= 0 +
(+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT CODE = 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED 0-D TREES 4: ALL OUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 1 TRIP TABLE FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATEDESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE (8001) 8004 8005 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 '002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0-- WARNING MESSAGE NUMBER 920 ROUTINE RDF179 PARAMETER(S). P1 8001 0--'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8004 0--'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - PI 8005 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8002 0--'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8003 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 2001 1 INTERNALCENTROIDS CENTROID LINK 2001 ("4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 2001 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE
FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODE/VOLUME DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 1 EVACUATIONSIMULATIONMODEL DEVELOPED FOR FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCY 0 OREMS 2.0 Alpha Case Study: Trip Dist. + Traffic Assignment + Simulation 0
1 RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS 0 RUN IDENTIFICATIONNUMBER 3 RUN TYPE CODE 0- (1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION,ASSIGNMENT, BOTH)
(-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION,ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 INPUT UNITS CODE ~ (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH. METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1,2.3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT. ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH)
UNITS 0 1600 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION(HHMM) 900'URATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 900'URATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 2 900'URATION (SEC) OF TiME PERIOD NO. 3 60'ENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL,SECONDS 10'AXIMUMINITIALIZATIONTIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 300 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS
'ALUES ASSERTED BY THE MODEL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS-1
'0 'toottotttttotttttot F0 ~ Otototoottoo ~ 00 ~ Otto ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ 000000ttooo ~ Ottttooott ~ 0000000too ~ 00000 ~ 0 ~ 00000 ~ 00000 ~ OttO ~ 000 ~ Otottoott ~ 00 ~ 0 ~
TIME PERIOD 1-ESIM DATA
~ 0 ~ 0000 ~ 0 ~ 000 ~ Ottttt ~ 0 ~ 0000000000ttto ~ 0 ~ 000 ~ 00000000tt ~ 000 ~ 0000000000 ~ Ootot ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 000 ~ Ottt ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 00 ~0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0000 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0000 ~ 000 ~ 0~0 ESIM LINKS
-LANES- -CHANNEL-F C U U LOST aDIS FREE LENGTH L PKT GRD R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED .
LINK FT / M L L R PCT B23456 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE (8001, 1) Ol 0 200 0 000000 2 3 0 0 0 2.5'.20 Ol 0 0 0
( 1 3) 52800/-" 210 0 000000
~ 4 0 0 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/64 1 0
( 3, 1) 52800/"." 201 0 000000 0 0 2 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/64 0 0 (8003, 3) 0/ 0 200 0 000000 0 1 4 0 0 2.5'.20 0/ 0 0 0
( 3, 4) 52800/-" 211 0 000000 2 58004 0 0 3.0 2.5 40! 64 0 0
( 4, 3) 52800/"" 211 0 000000 0 0 1 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/ 64 0 0 '
( 4, 5) 52$ X/-'200 0 000000 08005 0 0 3.0 2.5 40/64 0 0
( 5, 4) 52800/"" 211 0 000000 8004 3 2 0 0 3.0 2.5 4N64 0 0
( 4, 2) 52800/-" 200 0 000000 08002 0 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/ 64 0 0
( 2, 4) 52800/-" 21 1 0 000000 58004 3 0 0 4.0 3.5 40/ 64 0 0
( 1, 2) 52800/"00 200 0 000000 8002 0 4 0 0 3.0 2.5 25l 40 1 0
'NDICATES A DEFAULTVALUE, ASSIGNED INTERNALLYBY THE MODEL
LANE CHANNELIZATION RTOR PEDESTRIAN CODES CODES CODES 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 2 BUSES ONLY 2 MODERATE 3 CLOSED 3 HEAVY 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR-POOLS+BUSES ESIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURNMOVEMENTPERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE POCKET LENGTH (FEET/METERS)
LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL (PCT) (SECS) LEFT RIGHT (8001, 1) 0 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 (1,3) 0 0 0 0 YES NO NO NO 0 0 60/ 18 0/ 0 (3. 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 Ol 0 60/ 18 (8003, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0 0 0/ 0 0/ 0
( 3. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0' 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 4, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
'0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 Ol 0 0/ 0
( 4, 5)
( 5. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0 0 Of 0 Ol 0
( 2, 4) 0 0 0 0 YES YES YES NO 0 0 60/ 18 60/ 18
( 1, 2) 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0 0 Ol 0 0/ 0 1 FREEWAY SUBNETWORK PARAMETERS RELAXATIONTIMECOEFFICIENT 75SECONDS/MILE OR 46SECONDS/KM ANTICIPATIONCOEFFICIENT (EE-2) 50 MILES-2/HOUR OR 129 KM"2/HOUR TIME SLICE DURATION 3 SECONDS JAM DENSITY 180 (VEH/IANE-MILE) OR 112 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENTS FOR SPEED. DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RELATIONSHIP 1 COEFFICIENT 1 107 (MILES/HOUR) OR 172(KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 2 -231 (MILES/HOUR) (LANE4ILENEH) OR -598 (KM/HOUR) (LANE-KMNEH)
COEFFICIENT 3 215 (MILES/HOUR) (LANEAIILENEH)"2 OR 896 (KM/HOUR) (LANE-KMNEH)-2 COEFFICIENT 4 -74 (MILES/HOUR) (lANBAILENEH)-3 OR 496 (KM/HOUR) (LANE-KMNEH)-3 RELATIONSHIP 2 COEFFICIENT 1 80 (HOURS/MILE) OR 49(HOURS/KM)
COEFFICIENT 2 474 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE4IILENEH) OR 474 (HOURS/KM) (lANE-KMNEH)
COEFFICIENT 3 -591 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE-MILE/VEH)"2 OR>>951 (HOURS/KM) (LANE-KM/VEH)"2 COEFFICIENT 4 466 (HOURS/MILE) (LANE4lILENEH)"3 OR 1206 (HOURS/KM) (LANE-KMNEH)"3 RElATIONSHIP 3 COEFFICIENT 1 25. (VEH/LANE4llLE) OR 16 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENT 2 50. (VEH/LANEQIIILE) OR 31 (VEH/LANE-KM)
COEFFICIENT 3 35. (MILES/HOUR) OR 56 (KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 4 40. (MILES/HOUR) OR 64 (KM/HOUR)
COEFFICIENT 5 2. (DIMENSIONLESS) OR 2 (DIMENSIONLESS)
SPECIFIED FIXED-TIMESIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES NODE 1 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES---------------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8001, 1) ( 3, 1) 1 0 100 0 0 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES---------------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 2) ( 1 2) ~
0 'l00 5 5 NODE 3 OFFSET 50 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 55 SEC INTERVAL DURATION +--------- -----APPROACHES +
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 3) (8003, 3) ( 4, 3) 1 15 27 1 2 3 2 3 5 0 2 0 3 2 4 2 2 2 4 15 27 1 9 2 5 3 5 0 0 2 6 2 4 2 2. 2 7 10 18 2 2 3 8 3 5, 2 2 0 9 2 4 2 2 ~ 2 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES------------<<--+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 3, 4) ( 5, 4) ( 2, 4) 1 0 100 5 5 5 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION +---------------APPROACHES---------------+
NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 5) 1 0 100 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 5 STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONALARROW 7 NO TURNS-GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN-GREEN THRU AND RIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNAI.S CONTROL CODES GO R PROTECTED NOGO ~ NOT PERMITTED PERM m PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT % PROTECTED STOP ~ STOP SIGN YLD ~ YIELD SIGN NODE 1 SIGN CONTROL
PHASE DURATION APPROACHES (8001 ~ 1) ( 3, 1)
LEFTTHRU RITE DIAG LEFTTHRU RITE DIAG LEFTTHRU RITE DIAG LEFTTHRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 YLD YLD YLD I NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL I,
PHASE DURATION APPROACHES (4,2) (1 ~ 2)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP STOP NODE 3 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET < 50 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH = 55 SECONDS PHASE DURATION APPROACHES
( 1 3)
~ (8003, 3) (', 3)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 20 PROT NOGO NOGO GO 2 20 PROT GO GO NOGO 3 15 NOGO NOGO NOGO GO NODE 4 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION APPROACHES
( 3, 4) ( 5, 4) ( 2, 4)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP 1
NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL PHASE DURATION APPROACHES
( 4, 5)
LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 0--'ARNING -MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S)-P1 > 0, P2i 4, P3=
3 1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS-OF-A-PERSON I VEHICLE)
AUTOS CAR.POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) < 1.0% +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION ~ 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS ~ 15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS~ 1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL, 1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)* 0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA < 60/100 +
BETA <40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)" -0 +
t
(+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT CODE = 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED 0-D TREES 4: ALLOUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 TRIP TABLE FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATEDESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE (8001) 8004, 8005 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 8002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0-"'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) . P1 8001 0"-'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179. PARAMETER(S) - P1 8004 0-"'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8005 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8002 O'-- WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8003 0"'- WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 2001 1 INTERNAL CENTROIDS CENTROID LINK 2001 ( 4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 2001 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT".SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODE/VOLUME DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 1 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003 ( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 1 CAPACITYITERATION: 1 C
RECEIVER GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 0 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 813.3 389 1400 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2400 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.1'598 160 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 0 40.1 L INT, 570 2400 0.3 R EXIT V>C
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0139603.8 '
( 4, 5) 905.0 905.0 1000 39.8 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1435.0
~
661 0 25.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.064752.0 533 1560 0.6 L EXIT V>C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004)
( 4, 5) '06.0 905.0 905.0 1000 906.0 460 0 39.8 T EXIT 0 39.7 L INT 0 40.2 T EXIT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 895.0 2880
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT. 7~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT -
"INTERNALLINK II NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES< 42800.00 VEHICLE-HOURS= 122142.91 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 0.35 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 2 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN'.8001( 1, 3)( 3, 4)( 4, 5)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)( 4, 5) 0ORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1 2) ( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)
~
1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 2 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURNRECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0
~ 7.7 1085 702 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~ 8.0 57.7 389 698 0.0 L INT V>C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2400 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.1 1598 160 40.0 R INT .
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 937.9 1337 702 38.4 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.011414.5 570 1196 3.2 R EXIT V+C
( 4 5)
~ 905.0 8069.7 1000 1906 4.5 T INT V+C
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1435.2 661 80 25.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 5346.2 533 778 6.7 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 905.0 1000 80 39.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5.8005) 52800 895 895.0 998.0 2880 1906 36.1 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 695.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNALLINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4!ILES* 69683.17 VEHICLE-HOURS< 10694.38 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)R 6.52
MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 3 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE.
OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)( 4, 2)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 3 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 RECEIVER GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 507 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 141.6 389 893 0.0 L INTV>C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2400 0.0 R INTV>C
,( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0, 894 0 0.0 T INT, 40.0 R INT
( 3, 1) (.1 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.1 1598 160
~
507 39.6 L INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 908.1 1337
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3749.2 570 863 9.6 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2845.0 1000 1375 12.7 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 3334.1 460 669 10.8 L INT V>C
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1700.5 661 493 21.2 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2496.2 533 561 14.4 L EXIT ViC*
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 937.0 1000 493 38.4 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 922.9 2880 1375 39.0 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903,0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4. 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905,0 1013.6 1000 669 35.5 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4tlLESi 73226.59 VEHICLE-HOURS~ 4757.27 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)> 15.39 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 4 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN.'8001 ( 1 ~ 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 4 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001 ~ 1) ( 1 3) ~
0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 496 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)~ 8.0 148.2 389 904 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2349 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 51 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.2 1598 211 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 907.2 1337 496 39.7 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3514.5 570 845 10.2 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2685.0 1000 1346 13.4 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 3133,9 460 655 11.5 L INTViC
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1678.6 661 482 21.4 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3157.3 533 633 11.4 L EXIT V>C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 934.3 1000 482 38.5 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 920.6 2880 1346 39.1 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 -39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK 35.8 T EXIT
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 1004.6 1000 655 OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT "
-INTERNALLINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4hlLES= 73089.80 VEHICLE-HOURS= 4691.01 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)< 15.58 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 5 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1) ( 1 2)( 2, 4)
~
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 'I)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 5 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 k
GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 4&0 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 158.4 389 920 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2273 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 127 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.6 1598 287 39.9 R INT
( 1. 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 905.9 1337 480 39.7 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4.8004) 52800 895 903,0 3191.0 570 817 11.3 R EXIT V+C
( 4, 5) 905.0 2464.5 1000 1302 14.6 T INT V>C
( 4, 2) 906.0 2857.9 460 633 12.6 L INT V>C
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2001.0
~ 661 595 18.0 R INT
( 2.8002) 1438.0 2944.3 533 613 12.2 L EXIT V+C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 973.1 1000 595 37.0 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7. L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 917.4 2880 1302 39.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 402 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 992.3 1000 633 36.3 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T<THROUGH, D>DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLHAILES~ 74173.14 VEHICLE-HOURS~ 4477.05 AVERAGE 1 'INIMUM SPEED(MPH)< 16.57 PATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 6 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 (,.1 2)~
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT, ITERATION: 6 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 478 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 159.4 389 922 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2265 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 135 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.6 1598 295 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 905.8 1337 478 39.7 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3162.7 570 815 11.4 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2445.2 1000 1298 14.7 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 2833.8 460 631 12.7 L INT V>C
1994.0 661 593 18.1 R INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2,8002) 1438.0 3049.2 533 623 11.8 L EXIT V>>C
(
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT 905.0 972.3 000 593 37.0 T EXIT
( 4,8004)
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 480 1
39.7 L INT 2880 1298 39.3 T EXIT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 917.1 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT R INT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 991.2 1000 631 36.3 T EXIT
(
OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT ~ INTERNAL LINK ~
NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES~ 74150.24 VEHICLE-HOURS= 4474.76 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)~ 16.57 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 7 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1 2) ( 2, 4)
~
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1,,'2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMEN1 RESULTS AT ITERATION: 7 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001 ~ 1) ( 1 3)
~ 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 477 0.0 T INT
( 1 2) 8.0 160.4 389 923 0.0 L INT V>>C
~
(8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0'.0 927.6 417 2258 0.0 R INTV>>C
( 3, 1), 9.0 9.0 894 142 0.0 T INT 302 39.9 R INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2)52800 895 901.0 901.7 1598
~
( 1 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 905.7 1337
~
477 39.7 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3134.8 570 812 11.5 R EXIT V>>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 2426.2 1000 1294 14.8 T INT V>>C
( 4, 2) 906,0 2809.9 460 629 12.8 L INTV C
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2034.5 661 604 17.7 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3029.3 533 621 11.9 L EXIT V>>C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903,0 570 0 39.9 R INT' 4,8004) 905.0 977.2 1000 604 36.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0'9.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 916.9 2880 1294 39.3 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 990.2 1000 629 36.4 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D<DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLF4IILES= 74250.41 VEHICLE-HOURS~ 4460.13 AVERAGE 1 'INIMUM SPEED(MPH)< 16.65 PATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 8 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1 2)( 2, 4)
~
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 8 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH.LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURNRECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON LINK TOTAL
(8001 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 475 0.0 T INT 0.0 L INT Vic
~
( 1 2)
~
8.0 161.4 389 925 (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2251 0.0 R INTV~C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 149 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.8 1598 309 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 905.6 1337 475 39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3107.2 570 810 11.6 R EXITV C
( 4, 5) 905.0 2407.4 1000 1290 15.0 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 2786.4 460 627 12.9 L INT V>C
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2077.0 661 614 17.3 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3009.6 533 619 12.0 L EXIT V+C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 982.3 1000 614 36.6 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 916.6 2880 1290 39.3 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 989.1 1000 627 36.4 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: RiRIGHT, T~THROUGH, DiDIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT "
-INTERNALLINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES< 74350.26, VEHICLE-HOURS= 4446.54 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)~ 16.72 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 9 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1 2)( 4, 3)
~
1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 9 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURNRECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 474 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 162.3 389 926 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2244 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 156 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.8 1598 316 39.9 R INT
( 1 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 905.5 1337
~ 474 39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3079.9 570 807 11.7 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5), 905.0 2388.8 1000 1286 15.1 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 2763.1 460 625 13.0 L INT V+C
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2069.0
~ 661 612 17.4 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3117.6 533 630 11.5 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 981.3 1000 612 36.7 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 916.3 2880 1286 39.3 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 988.1 1000 625 36.4 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D<DIAGONAL,L>LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4IILES< 74326.81 VEHICLE-HOURS< 4445.90 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)< 16.72 1 MINIMUMPATHCONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 10 UST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE
OORIGIN:8001( 1 2)( 2, 4)
~
0ORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
'OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2 4)( 4 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 10 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.2 1085 472 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 163.3 389 928 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2237 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 163 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.9 1598 323 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3,'4)52800 895 897.0 905.4 1337 472 39.8 L INT V>C
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3053.0 570 804 11.8 R EXIT
( 4, 5) 905.0 2370.4 1000 1282 15.2 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 2740.2 460 623 13.1 L INT V>C
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 2113.2 661 623 ~ 17.0 R INT
( 2,8002) . 1438.0 3096.8 533 628 11.6 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 986.7 1000 623 36.5 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 916.1 2880 1282 39.3 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 987.0 1000 623 36.5 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R=RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D-"DIAGONAL,L<LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES- "74426.43 VEHICLE-HOURS= 4433.24 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)R 16.79 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 11 LIST OF LABELLED INTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1 2) ( 4, 3)
~
1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 11 CAPACITYITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.1 1085 461 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 170.8 389 939 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2241 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 159 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.9 1598 319 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 904,6 1337 461 39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3477.0 570 842 10.4 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2239.1 1000 1252 16.1 T INT V>C
( 4, 2) 906.0 2575.7 460 609 14.0 L INT ViC
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 2052.4 661 608 17.5 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3337.7 533 649 10.8 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 979.3 1000 608 36.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 914.2 2880 1252 39.4 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0,0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 979.7 1000 609 36.7 T EXIT
OTURN TYPE'RaRIGHT TaTHROUGH DmDIAGONAL, L LEFT; RECEIVER.'NT a INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES" -73692.54 VEHICLE-HOURS= 4483.89 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)> 16 43 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 12 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)( 2, 4) ~
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 12 CAPACITYITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1 3) 0 0 7.0 7.1 1085
~
460 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 171.8 389 940 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0.927.6 417 2234 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 166 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 '901'.0 901.9 1598 326 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 904.5 1337 460 39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3445.1 570 839 10.4 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2222.6 1000 1248 16.2 T INT ViC
( 4, 2) 906.0 2555.1 460 607 14.1 L INT ViC
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 2095.8 661 619 17.2 R INT
, ( 2,8002) 1438.0 3314.2 533 647 10.9 L EXIT V>C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 984.6 1000 619 36.6 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4. 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 913.9 2880 1248 39.4 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 978.8 1000 607 36.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R=RIGHT, 7=THROUGH, D*DIAGONAL,L=LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4hlLES"- 73794.11 VEHICLE-HOURS< 4470.18 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)R 16.51 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 13 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)(,2, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 13 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET . TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.1 1085 458 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 172.8 389 942 0.0 L INTV+C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2227 0.0 R INTV>>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 173 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2)52800 895 901.0 902.0 1598
~ 333 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 904.4 1337 458 "39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3413.7 570 836 10.5 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2206.3 1000 1244 16.3 T INT V+C
( 4, 2) 906.0 2534.7 460 605 14.2 L INT ViC
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2141.2 661 629 16.8 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3291.0 533 645 10.9 L EXIT V+C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 '39.9 R INT
I
( 4,8004) 905.0 990.0 1000 629 36.4 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT 1244 39.4 T EXIT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 913.7 2880
( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 5, 4)
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT>>
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 977.8 1000 605 36.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D"-DIAGONAL,L-"LEFT; RECEIVER: INT i INTERNALLINK NETWORK HOURLYESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES'3895.39 VEHICLE-HOURS= 4457.57 AVERAGE 1, 'INIMUM SPEED(MPH)= 16.58 PATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 14 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 14 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL" CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) "'VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0'.1 1085 457 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~
8.0 173.8 389 943 0.0 L< INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2220 0.0 R INTV+C
( 3, 1) . 9.0 9.0 894 180 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1,') 52800 895 901.0 902.1 1598 340 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 904.3 1337 457 39.8 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3382.6 570 834 10.6 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 2190.2 1000 1240 16.4 T INT V>C
( 4, 2) 906.0 2514.6 460 603 14.3 L INTViC
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0'2188.9 661 639 16.4 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438,0 3268.1 533 643 11.0 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 995.8 1000 639 36.2 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 913.5 2880 1240 39.4 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT>>
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0,976.9 1000 603 36.8. T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, 7<THROUGH, D"-DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4IILES< 73996.34 VEHICLE-HOURS"- 4446.06 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)~ 16.64 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 15 LIST OF lABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN.'8001 ( 1, 2)( 2, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)( 4, 5)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 15 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 4
GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE. FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURNRECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH 'PH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.1 1085 441 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 185.1 389 959 0.0 L INTV+C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 927.6 417 2227 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 173 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 902.0 1598 333 39.9 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 903.4 1337 441 39.9 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 3058.3 570 805 11.8 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 2363.9 1000 1280 15.2 T INT V>C
( 4, 2) 906.0 2304.1 460 583 15.6 L INT V~C
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 2349.9 661 671 15.3 R INTViC
( 2,8002) 1438.0 3028.7 533 621 11.9 L EXIT V~C 0 39.9 R INT 4,8004) '05.0
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 1015.1 906.0 906.0 460 570 1000 671 35,5 T EXIT 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5)
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 916.0 2880 1280 39.3 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 160 40.2 R INT
( 2,2001), 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 967.5 1000 583 37.2 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R*RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES~ 74285.78 VEHICLE-HOURS" -4387.89 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 16.93 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT EVALUATION ITERATION OBJECTIVE FUNCTION BOUNDGAP(%) LAMBDA CONTRIBUTION(%)
VALUE (VEH-SEC) 1 0,9213080800E+08 100.000000 1.000000 31.321474 2 0.1350734500E+08 100.000000 0.501552 31.516478 3 0.9575877000E+07 100.000000 0.278641 24.272505 4 0.9544929000E+07 47.593208 0.021286 1.894586 5 0.9508969000E<07 40.226360 0.032523 2.992013 6 0.9509339000 E+07 18.568750 0.003106 0.286625 7 0.9509713000E+07 1?.501295 0.003106 0.287518 8 0.951 0807000E+07 15.047194 0.003106 0.288413 9 0.951 2299000E+07 14.654764 0.003106 0.289312 10 0.951 401 3000E+07 12.865901 0.003106 0.290213 11 0.9500724000E+07 10.996099 0.023205 2.219784 12 0.9501816000E+07 11.006328 0.003106 0.298034 13 0.9503658000 E+07 11.023577 0.003106 0.298962 14 0.9506268000Ei07 9.784460 0.003106 0.299894
~ 15 0.9489179000E+07 8.585958 0.034442 3.444183 DETAILED LIST OF O-D MINIMUMPATHS THE FOLLOWING LISTING PROVIDES THE ASSIGNED VOLUMEAND THE SEQUENCE OF INTERNAL NODE NUMBERS FOR EACH 0-D MININIMUMPATH.
TOTAL DEMANDIS PRINTED FOLLOWING ALL PATHS FOR EACH 0-D PAIR.
NOTE THAT CUMULATIVETRAVEL TIME (SEC) FOR THE 0-D PATH IS PRINTED FOLLOWING THE NODE LIST.
O-D VOLUME PATH ROUTE 80014004 454.0 1, 2, 4 (SEC): 185.1,2535.0,3550.2 454 VPH 80014005 441.0 1 ~ 3, 4, 5 (SEC): 7.1, 910.5,3274.4,4190.4 441 VPH 80014I002 504.0 1, 2 (SEC): 185.1,3213.8
504 VPH 80034I005 839.0 3, 4, 5 (SEC): 927.6,3291.5,4207.5 8."9 VPH 80034004 804.9 3, 4 (SEC): 927.6,3985.9 80034004 114.1 3, 1, 2, 4 (SEC): 9.0, 911.0,3260.9,4276.1 919 VPH 80038002 581.8 3, 4, 2 (SEC): 927.6,3231.7,4199.3 80034)002 59.2 3, 1, 2 (SEC): 9.0, 911.0,3939.7 641 VPH 20014004 102.0 4, 3, 1, 2, 4 (SEC): 0.0, 895.0,1797.0,4146.9,5162.1 102 VPH 20014002 57.0 4, 3, 1, 2 (SEC): 0.0, 895.0,1797.0,4825.7 57 VPH 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT RESULTS ESIM SUBNETWORK INTERNAL RIGHT TURN THRU LEFT TURN DIAGONAL SOURCE SINK DISCHARGE SPEED LINK CENTROID VOL Pcv VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. FLOW FLOW VOLUME ESTIMATE VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH MPH (8001, 1) 0 0 0 441 32 959 68 0 0 0 0 1400
( 1, 3) 0 0 0 0 0 441 100 0 0 0 0 441 39.8
( 3, 1) 0 333 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 39.9 (8003, 3) 0 2227 93 173 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2400
( 3, 4) 0 805 30 1280 48 583 22 0 0 0 0 2668 14.0
( 4, 3) 2001 160 100 0 0 0 0 0 0'60 0 160 40.2
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 1280 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1280 39.3
( 5, 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 583 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 583 37.2
( 2, 4) 0 0 0 671 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 671 35.4
( 1 2)~ 0 671 52 0 0 621 48 0 0 0 0 1292 13.4 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ESIM ENTRY LINKVOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS (VELOUR) (PERCENT)
(8001, 1) 1400 0 (8003, 3) 2400 0 1tte ~ otoeooo ~ oetoeeoe ~ o ~ otettttteeoeteooetoeotttoteteetotooooooo ~ ottetteooteeettootoeeoteooeoooooooootoootte ~ ooteeetootootooeeteoo ~o TIME PERIOD 2-ESIM DATA
~ tootooooottoooooeooeeo ~ oee ~ oetootteee ~ eoeeo ~ oto ~ oeoooeo ~ e ~ o ~ e ~ eeoeeeoeo ~ o ~ oto ~ e ~ oo ~ o ~ ooo ~ oooo ~ oee ~ eo ~ e ~ oo ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ e ~ o ~ e ~ e ~ e ~ o ~ e ~ e~
ESIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE
LINK LEFTTHROUGHRIGHT DIAGONAL LEFTTHROUGHRIGHTDIAGONAL (PCT)
(SECS)
(8001, 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (1,3)' 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 3, 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (8003, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (3 4) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 4, 3) 0,0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (4 5) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 5,') 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0 0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 ,NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 2. 4) 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0 0
( 1, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 O'"" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 0, P2= 4, P3=
3 1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS-OF-A-PERSON / VEHICLE)
AUTOS CAR.POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) < 1.0'II +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION ~ 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS = 15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS = 1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL,,1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)- "0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA > 60/100 +
BETA->>40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)< 0 +
(+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT CODE R 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED 0-D TREES 4: ALL OUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 TRIP TABLE FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATE DESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE (8001) 8004 8005 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 8002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 K 8001 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 8004 O'"" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 8005 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 ~ 8002 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 8003 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S)- P1 ~ 2001 1 INTERNALCENTROIDS CENTROID LINK
2001 ( 4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 2001 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODEA/OLUME DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 1 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 1 CAPACITYITERATION: 1 kl GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE. FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 .1085
~ 0 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~ 8.0 217.6 389 1000 0.0 L INT V+C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200. 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2)52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598
~ 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 0 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.011546.0 570 1200 3.1 R EXIT V+C
( 4, 5) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1435.0 661 0 25.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.015982.4 533 1080 2.3 L EXIT V>C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4.8004) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 2880 0 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, '1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R*RIGHT, T~THROUGH, 0=DIAGONAL, L<LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK t 1 NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES= 24400.00 VEHICLE-HOURS< 8828.05 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)R 2.76 I 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 2 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1 ~ 2)( 2, 4)
QORIGIN:8003( 3, 4) ( 4, 5)
QORIGIN:2001( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)( 2, 4)( 4. 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONASSIGNMENTRESULTSAT ITERATION: 2CAPACITYITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 0 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 217.6 389 1000 0.0 L INTV>C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 0 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1814.8 570 649 19.8 R EXIT ViC
( 4, 5) 905.0 955.0 1000 551 37.7 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1707.3
~
661 496 21.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2684.1 533 584 13.4 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 &95 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 937.8 1000 496 38.4 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895,0 895.7 2880 551 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT QTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, 7=THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,L=LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNALLINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES= 34864.75 VEHICLE-HOURS= 1594.94 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 21.86 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION. '3 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE QORIGIN:8001( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)( 4, 2)
QORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)( 4, 2)
QORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 2, 4)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 3 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001 1) ( 1, 3)
~ 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 31 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~ 8.0 192.6 389 969 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 31 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1705.8 570 629 21.1 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 949.0 1000 534 37.9 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.3 460 69 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1679.8 661 483 21.4 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2535.1 533 566 14.2 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 934.5 1000 483 38.5 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 895.6 2880 534 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 402 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 69 39.8 T EXIT QTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D<DIAGONAL, CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK
VEHICLE-HOURS= 1539.00 AVERAGE NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES VEHICLE-MILES< 35564.65 SPEED(MPH)= 23.11 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 4 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 3)( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 4 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACI7I'OLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) $ 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 44 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 183.0 389 956 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 44 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1816.7 570 650 19.8 R EXIT V>C 905.0 946.7 1000 526 38.0 T INT
( 4, 5)
( 4, 2)'06.0 906.3 460 68 39.7 L INT 476 21.6 R INT
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1667.2
~
661
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2486.3 533 560 14.5 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 933.0 1000 476 38.6 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.6 2880 526 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) . 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4. 3) ( 3. 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3.2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 68 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R=RIGHT, T<THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,L=LEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4hlLES~ 35549.33 VEHICLE-HOURS= 1545.84 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 23.00 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 5 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:800I ( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3. 4)( 4 2)
OORIGIN:2001 ( 3. 1)( 1. 2)( 4 1TRAFFICDISTRIBUTIONASSIGNMENTRESULTSAT ITERATION: 5CAPACITYITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 43 0.0 T INT
~
( 1 ~ 2), 8,0 183.6 389 957 (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 L INTV+C 0.0 R INTViC
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2)52800 895 901.0 90I.O 1598
~
80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 43 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903,0 1758.7 570, 639 20.5 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 944.1 1000 518 38.1 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.7 460 86 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1652.4 661 469 21.8 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2551.2 533 568 14.1 L EXIT V+C
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 931.2 1000 469 38.7 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.6 2880 518 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T. INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 402 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 86 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T~THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,L=LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES"- 35563.16 VEHICLE-HOURS= 1543.05 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 23.05 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 6 LIST OF LABELLED INTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 3)( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 6 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001 ~ 1) ( 1 3)
~ 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 51 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 177.9 389 949 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 51 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1828.7 570 652 19.7 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 942.8 1000 514 38.2 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.7 460 86 39.7 L INT
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1645.4
~ 661 465- 21.9 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2520.4 533 564 14.3 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 930.3 1000 465 38.7 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.5 2880 514 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 86 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT, TiTHROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE48ILES~ 35553.71 VEHICLE-HOURS= 1547.93 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)* 22.97 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 7 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)( 4, 2)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 7 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 51 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~ 8.0 178.3 389 949 0.0 L INTV>C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTV>>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2)52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598
~
80 40.0 R INT
40.1 L INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 51
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1792.0 570 645 20.1 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 941.3 1000 509 38.2 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 907.1 460 97 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1637.1 661 460 22.0 R INT 1438.0 2560.8 533 569 14.1 L EXIT ViC
( 2,8002)
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 929.3 10¹ 460 38.7 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 I. INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.5 2880 509 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 97 39.8 T EXIT I
OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, T<THROUGH, D<DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES= 35562.21 VEHICLE-HOURS"- 1546.30 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 23.00 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 8 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1, 3)( 3, 4)
OORIGIN.'8003 ( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1) ( 1 2)( 4, 3) ~
1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 8 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH.LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001 ~ 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 54 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 176.2 389 946 0.0 L INTViC (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R, INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
(, 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 54 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1819.0 570 650 19.8 R EXIT V C
( 4, 5) 905.0 940.9 1000 507 38.3 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 907.1 460 97 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1634.6 661 459 22.0 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2548.8 533 568 14.1 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 929.0 1000 459 38.8 T EXIT
( 4. 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 895.5 2880 . 507 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1)52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 97 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R~RIGHT, T<THROUGH, D>DIAGONAL,L<LEFT; RECEIVER: INT ~ INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4!ILES< 35558.60 VEHICLE-HOURS< 1548.24 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)< 22.97 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 9 LIST OF lABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001( 1, 3) (', 4)( 4, 2)
OORIGIN.'8003( 3, 4)( 4, 2)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 9 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1
GEOMETRIC PATH-LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 58 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 172.8 389 942 0.0 L INTV>C (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 252.9 417 1200 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 80 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 58 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1800.7 570 647 20.0 R EXIT V+C
( 4, 5) 905.0 940.2 1000 504 38.3 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 907.6 460 107 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1630.6
'61 456 22.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 2529.8 533 565 14.2 L EXIT ViC
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 928.6 1000 456 38.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005)52800 895 895.0 895.5 2880 504 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 80 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.1 1000'07 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D*DIAGONAL,L*LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES" -35663.32 VEHICLE-HOURS~ 1540.40 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 23.15 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT EVALUATION ITERATION OBJECTIVE FUNCTION BOUND GAP(II) LAMBDA CONTRIBUTION(%)
VALUE (VEH-SEC) 1 0.88211 99000 E+07 100.000000 1.000000 49.549995 2 0.436601 7500 E+07 100.000000 0.458981 42.036346 0.4363048000E+07 4.426641 0.031336 2.962784 4 0.4361387000 E+07 4.390243 0.013156 1.260427 5 0.4360793000E+07 1.757719 0.016261 1.583757 6 0.4360280500 E+07 1.746172 0.008131 0.798370 7 0.4360006500E+07 1.197865 0.010050 0.996809 8 0.4359877500E+07 1.194942 0.003106 0.309030 9 0.4359782000 E+07 0.755542 0.005025 0.502482 DETAILED LIST OF O.D M!NIMUMPATHS THE FOLLOWING LISTING PROVIDES THE ASSIGNED VOLUMEAND THE SEQUENCE OF INTERNAL NODE NUMBERS FOR EACH O-D MININIMUMPATH.
TOTAL DEMANDIS PRINTED FOLLOWING ALL PATHS FOR EACH 0-D PAIR.
NOTE THAT CUMULATIVETRAVEL TIME (SEC) FOR THE 0-D PATH IS PRINTED FOLLOWING THE NODE LIST.
0-D VOLUME PATH ROUTE 8001~ 420,3 1, 2, 4 (SEC): 172.8,1803.5,2732.0 80014004 23.7 1, 3, 4 (SEC): 7.0, 904.0,2704.7 444 VPH 0 VPH 80014002 520.4 1, 2
(SEC): 172.8,2702.6 800141002 34.6 1, 3, 4, 2 (SEC): 7.0,904.0,1811.6,2716.7 555 VPH 80034005 504.0 3, 4, 5 (SEC): 252.9,1193.0,2088.5 504 VPH 80034004 623.0 3, 4 (SEC): 252.9,2053.6 623 VPH 80034002 72.0 3, 4, 2 (SEC): 252.9,1160.5,2065.6 72 VPH 20014004 35.0 4, 3, 1 ~ 2, 4 (SEC): 0.0, 895.0,1796.0,3426.6,4355.2 35 VPH 20014002 44.0 4, 3, 1 ~ 2 (SEC): 0.0, 895.0,1796.0,4325.0 44 VPH 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT RESULTS ESIM SUBNETWORK INTERNAL RIGHT TURN THRU LEFT TURN DIAGONAL SOURCE SINK DISCHARGE SPEED LINK CENTROID VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. FLOW FLOW VOLUME ESTIMATE VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH MPH (8001, 1) 0 0 0 58 6 942 94 0 0 0 0 1000
( 1 ~ 3) 0 0 0 0 0 58 100 0 0 0 0 58 40.1
( 3, 1) 0 80 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 39.9 (8003, 3) 0 1200 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200
( 3, 4) 0 647 51 504 40 107 9 0 0 0 0 1258 26.0
( 4, 3) 2001 80 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 80 40.2
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 504 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 504 40.2
( 5, 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 107 100 0 0 0 0 0. 0 107 39.7
( 2, 4) 0 0 0 456 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 456 38.7
( 1 2)
~ 0 456 45 0 0 565 55 0 0 0 0 1021 16.9 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ESIM ENTRY LINKVOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT)
(8001, 1) 1000 0 (8003, 3) 1200 0 1eteottooootetoootooooeeetooootte ~ ettttttooottootoeeoe ~ ee ~ e ~ otoooeotoooootoeeooetooee ~ eo ~ eeto ~ e ~ etooto ~ o ~ eoooteeoooeeeooooooeotoooeo TIME PERIOD 3- ESIM DATA ESIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE BLOCKAGE LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL (PCT)
(SECS)
(8001 ~ 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 1 ~ 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 3, 1) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (8003, 3) ~ 0 0 0 0 . NO YES
'NO NO 0 0
( 3. 4) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 4, 3) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0
( 4.
( 5. 4)
- 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
NO NO NO
'YES NO YES NO NO
' 0 0 0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0 0 (2 4) 0 0 0 0 YES NO YES NO 0
0 0
0
( 1, 2) 0 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 622, ROUTINE CHKPH2, PARAMETER(S) - P1 = 0, P2r 4, P3r 3
1 AVERAGE VEHICLE OCCUPANCIES (HUNDREDTHS-OF-A-PERSON/ VEHICLE) 4 AUTOS CAR-POOLS TRUCKS BUSES 130 350 120 250 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS EPSILON (OBJ.FUNC.THRESHOLD VALUE) ~ 1.0% +
LINE SEARCH ACCURACY OF OBJ.FUNCION r 1.0% +
MAX.NUMBEROF ASSIGNMENT ITERATIONS = 15 MAX.NUMBEROF CAPACITY CALIBRATIONS r -1 +
TYPE OF OBJECTIVE FUNCTION (0:USER OPTIMAL, 1:SYSTEM OPTIMAL)= 0 +
IMPEDANCE FUNCTION PARAMETERS:
ALPHA s 60/100 +
BETA s40/10 +
TYPE (0:FHWA, 1:MODIFIED DAVIDSON)"- 0 +
, (+):INDICATES DEFAULT VALUE REQUESTED INTERMEDIATEOUTPUTCODE r 4 0: NO INTERMEDIATEOUTPUT 1: PATH ASSIGNMENTS 2: TREE CONSTRUCTS 3: DETAILED 0-D TREES 4: ALL OUTPUTS 1,2 AND 3 TRIP TABLE FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF CANDIDATE DESTINATION NODES ORIGIN NODE'(8001) 8004 8005 8002 ORIGIN NODE (8003) 8005 8004 8002 ORIGIN NODE (2001) 8004 8002 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8001 0--'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 r 8004 0--'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8005 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 8002 0""'ARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 s 8003 0"'" WARNING - MESSAGE NUMBER 920, ROUTINE RDF179, PARAMETER(S) - P1 2001 1 INTERNALCENTROIDS CENTROID LINK 2001 ( 4, 3)
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SOURCE VOLUMES
ORIGIN NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8001 9000 8003 9000 2001 6000 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT:SINKVOLUMES DESTINATION NODE VOLUME (VPH) 8002 9000 8004 9000 8005 6000 DESTINATION TRIP TABLE FOR EACH DESTINATION NODE, TABLE PROVIDES LISTING OF DATA PAIRS: ORIGIN NODE/VOLUME DESTINATION (8002) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8004) 8001/3000 8003/3000 2001/3000 DESTINATION (8005) 8001/3000 8003/3000 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 1 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1 2) ~
OORIGIN.'8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 1 CAPACITYITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE
,ON. LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 0 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 8.3 389 200 0.0 L INT (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 125.1 417 1000 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 1 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 0 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 6035.6 570 1000 6.0 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1435.0 661 0 25.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 1455.4 533 201 24.7 L EXIT
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 2880 0 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 1 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, 7<THROUGH, D=DIAGONAL,L<LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE4IILES~ 12030.00 VEHICLE-HOURS< 1793.53 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH) ~ 6.71 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 2 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNALLINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN'.8001( 1, 2)
OORIGIN.'8003( 3, 4)( 4, 5)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4. 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 2 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1
RECEIVER GEOMETRIC PATH. LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEED TURN LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON. LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1, 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085 0 0.0 T INT
( 1, 2) 8.0 8.3 389 200 0.0 L INT (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 125.1 417 1000 0.0 R INTV>C
( 3, 1) 9.0 9.0 .894 0'.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1 2) 52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598
~
1 40.0 R INT
( 1, 3) ( 3, 4) 52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337 0 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1804.9 570 647 19.9 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 913.4 1000 353 39.4 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1, 2) ( 2, 4)52800 1427 1435.0 1435.0 661 0 25.1 R INT
( 2,8002) 1438.0 1455.4 533 "201 24.7 L EXIT
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( .4,8004) '05.0 905.0 '1000 0 39.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.1 2880 353 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) '05.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 1 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK 4, 2) ( 2,8002) 52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39,8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R>RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D<DIAGONAL,L=LEFT; RECEIVER: INT = INTERNAL LINK NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE.MILES~ 15555.49 VEHICLE-HOURS= 618.68 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 25.14 1 MINIMUMPATH CONSTRUCTS FOR ITERATION: 3 LIST OF LABELLEDINTERNAL LINKS FOR EACH ORIGIN NODE OORIGIN:8001 ( 1 ~ 2)
OORIGIN:8003( 3, 4)
OORIGIN:2001( 3, 1)( 1, 2)( 4, 3) 1 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT RESULTS AT ITERATION: 3 CAPACITY ITERATION: 1 GEOMETRIC PATH.LINK LENGTH FREE-FLOW TRAVEL CAPACITY VOLUME SPEEDTURN RECEIVER LINK RECEIVER FEET TIME(SEC) TIME(SEC) VPH VPH (MPH) TYPE TYPE ON-LINK TOTAL (8001, 1) ( 1 3) 0 0 7.0 7.0 1085
~
0 0.0 T INT
( 1 2)
~ 8.0 8.3 389 200 0.0 L INT (8003, 3) ( 3, 4) 0 0 6.0 125.1 417 1000 0.0 R INTV>C
(. 3, 1) " 9.0 9.0 894 0 0.0 T INT
( 3, 1) ( 1, 2)52800 895 901.0 901.0 1598 1 40.0 R INT
( 1 3) ( 3, 4)52800 895 897.0 897.0 1337
~
0 40.1 L INT
( 3, 4) ( 4,8004) 52800 895 903.0 1811.0 570 649 19.9 R EXIT V>C
( 4, 5) 905.0 913.3 1000 351 39.4 T INT
( 4, 2) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 1 2) ( 2, 4) 52800 1427 1435.0 1435.0 661
~ 0 25.1 R INT
( 2.8002) 1438.0 1455.4 533 201 24.7 L EXIT
( 2, 4) ( 4, 3) 52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4,8004) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT
( 4, 5) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L INT
( 4, 5) ( 5,8005) 52800 895 895.0 895.1 2880 351 40.2 T EXIT
( 5, 4) ( 4, 2)52800 895 903.0 903.0 570 0 39.9 R INT
( 4, 3) 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T INT
( 4,8004) 906.0 906.0 460 0 39.7 L EXIT
( 4, 3) ( 3, 1) 52800 895 895.0 895.0 3110 1 40.2 R INT
( 3,2001) 0.0 0.0 1800 0 40.2 SINK
( 4, 2) ( 2,8002)52800 895 905.0 905.0 1000 0 39.8 T EXIT OTURN TYPE: R<RIGHT, T=THROUGH, D"-DIAGONAL,CLEFT; RECEIVER: INT < INTERNAL LINK
NETWORK HOURLY ESTIMATES: VEHICLE-MILES= 15544.54 VEHICLE-HOURS~ 619.77 AVERAGE SPEED(MPH)= 25.08 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ASSIGNMENT EVALUATION ITERATION OBJECTIVE FUNCTION BOUNDGAP(%) LAMBDA CONTRIBUTION(%)
VALUE (VEH-SEC) 1 0.2372733750 E+07 100.000000, 1.000000 64,544006 2 0.1779704250 E+07 100.000000 0.352549 35.145401 3 0.1779703750E+07 0.068747 0.003106 0.310591 DETAILED LIST OF 0-D MINIMUMPATHS THE FOLLOWING LISTING PROVIDFS THE ASSIGNED VOLUMEAND THE SEQUENCE OF INTERNAL NODE NUMBERS FOR EACH 0-D MININIMUMPATH.
TOTAL DEMANDIS PRINTED FOLLOWING ALL PATHS FOR EACH 0-D PAIR.
NOTE THAT CUMULATIVETRAVELTIME (SEC) FOR THE 0-D PATH IS PRINTED FOLLOWING THE NODE LIST, 0-D VOLUME PATH ROUTE 0 VPH 0 VPH 80014002 200.0 1 ~ 2 (SEC): 8.3,1463.8 200 VPH 80034005 351.0 3, 4, 5 (SEC): 125.1,1038.3,1933.5 351 VPH 80034004 648.0 3, 4 (SEC): 125.1 1936.1
~
648 VPH 0 VPH 0 VPH 20014002 1.0 4, 3, 1, 2 (SEC): 0.0, 895.0,1796.0,3251.4 1 VPH 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT RESULTS ESIM SUBNETWORK I g INTERNAL RIGHT TURN THRU LEFT TURN DIAGONAL SOURCE SINK DISCHARGE SPEED LINK CENTROID VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. VOL. PCT. FLOW FLOW VOLUME ESTIMATE VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH VPH MPH (8001. 1) 0 0 0 0 0 200 100 0 0 0 0 200 (1,3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
( 3, 1) 0 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39.9 (8003, 3) 0 1000 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000
( 3, 4) 0 649 65 351 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 24.0
( 4, 3) 2001 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 40.2
( 4, 5) 0 0 0 351 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 40.2
( 5, 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0
( 4, 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
( 2, 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
( 1 2)
~ 0 0 0 0 0 201 100 0 0 0 0 201 ~ 24.7 1 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ESIM ENTRY LINKVOLUMES
LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT)
(8001, 1) 200 0 (8003, 3) 1000, 0 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16: 5: 0 ELAPSEDTIMEIS 0:5:0( 300SECONDS), TIMEPERIOD 1ELAPSEDTIMEIS 300SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 117 1400 (8003, 3) 94 1126
( 3, 1) 134.30 13 3.36 0.02 3.38 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 69 161 39.8
( 1, 3) 177.77 18 4.44 0.03 4.47 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 92 213 39.8
( 3, 4) 380.38 38 9.51 0,05 9.56 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 219 456 39.8
( 1, 2) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 2, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 ' 0 0.0
( 4, 5) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 133.33 13 3.33 0.02 3.35 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 160 39.8
( 4, 2) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 NETWORK< 825.78 1 20.64 0.12 20.76 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.55 5.09 381.5 39.8 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:10: 0 ELAPSEDTIME IS 0:10:0( 600SECONDS) ~ TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSEDTIMEIS 600SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT'VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 233 1399 (8003, 3) 189 1135
( 3, 1) 412.13 41 10.30 0.06 10.36 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 69 247 39.8
( 1 3) 545.53
~ 55 13.64 0.08 13.72 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 92 327 39.8
( 3, 4) 1193.11 119 29,83 0.17 30.00 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 255 715 39.8
( 1 2) 58.03
~ 6 1.16 0.00 1.16 1.00 120 0.00 720.0 0.0 354 34 25.2
( 2, 4) 0.00 . 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 5) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 266.67 27 6.67 0.04 6.70 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 159 39.8
( 4, 2) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 NE'IWORK< 2475.47 5 61.60 0.34 61.94 0.99 1.50 0.01 804.38 443 773.0 40.0 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:15: 0 ELAPSEDTIMEIS 0:15:0( 900SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1ELAPSEDTIMEIS 900SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME, TIME TIME TOTAL 'IME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 350 1400 (8003, 3) 282 1127
( 3, 1) 689.96 69 17.25 0.10 17.35 0.99 1.51 0,01 905.1 5.1 69 '275 39.8
( 1 3) 913.30 91
~
22.83 0.13 22.96 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 92 365 39.8
( 3, 4) 2004.11 200 50.10 0.28 50.39 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 289 801 39.8
( 1, 2) 824.0I 82 32.96 0.30 33.26 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 386 329 24.8
- 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 2, 4, 5) 17.08 2 0.14 0.00 0.14 1.00 0.50 0.00 300.0 0.0 75 6 40.2
(
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 5, 4) 0.00 40 10.00 0.06 10.06 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 160 39.8
( 4, 3) 400.00 11.84 0.10 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.50 0.00 300.0 0.0 50 4 40.2
( 4, 2) 1 0 NETWORK= 4860.28 12 133.39 0.86 134.25 0.99 1.66 0.01 682.83 4.39 963.8 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:20: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:20: 0 ( 1200 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 2 ElAPSED TIME IS 300 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS
, VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DElAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 433 1300 (8003, 3) 364 1090
( 3, 1) 967.78 97 24.19 0.14 24.33 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 48 290 39.8
( 1, 3) 1281.06 128 32.03 0.18 32.21 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 60 384 39.8
( 3, 4) 3146.30 315 78.66 0.44 79.10 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 293 943 39.8
( 1, 2) 1622.91 162 64.92 0.58 65.50 0.99 242 0.02 1453.0 13.0 412 486 24.8
( 2, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 5) 291.49 29 7.29 0.04 7.33 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 111 87 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 466.67 47 11.67 0.07 11.73 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 139 39.8
( 4, 2) "202.13 20 5.05 0.03 5.08 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 52 60 39.8 0 NETWORK~ 7978.34 24 223.80 1.48 225.28 0.99 1.69 0.01 573.57 3.77 979.9 35.4 1 CUMUlATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:25: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:25: 0 ( 1500 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 2 ELAPSED TIME IS 600 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 517 1240 (8003, 3) 443 1062
( 3, 1) 1245.61 125 31.14 0.18 31.32 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 27 298 39.8
( 1, 3) 1648.82 165 41.22 0.23 41.45 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 28 395 39.8
( 3, 4) 4305.59 431 107.64 0.61 108.25 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 293 1033 39.8
( 1 ~ 2) 2564.84 256 102.59 0.92 103.52 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 424 615 24.8
( 2, 4) 194.91 19 0.97 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.30 0.00 180.0 0.0 104 46 40.2
( 4, 5) 59346 59 14.84 0.08 14.92 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 148 142 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 533.33 53 13.33'0.08 13.41 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 127 39.8
( 4, 2) 411.52 41 10.29 0.06 10.35 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 52 98 39.8 0 NETWORK~ 11498.09 38 322.03 2.16 324.19 0.99 1.69 0.01 509.26 3.39 1079.5 35.5 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:30: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:30: 0 (1800 SECONDS) ~ TIME PERIOD 2 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 600 1200 (8003, 3) 524 1047
( 3, 1) 1421.37 142 35.53 0.20 35.74 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 16 284 39.8
( 1 3) 1862.31
~
186 46.56 0.26 46.82 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 12 372 39.8
( 3, 4) 5476.76 548 136.92 0.77 137.69 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 278 1095 39.8
( 1, 2) 3641.58 364 145.66 1.31 146.98 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 412 728 24.8
( 2, 4) 573.51 57 14.34 0.08 14.42 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 122 114 39.8
( 4, 5) 1058.97 106 26.47 0.15 26.62 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 168 211 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 600.00 60 15.00 0.08 15.08 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 119 39.8
( 4, 2) 618.70 62 15.47 0.09 15.55 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 52 123 39.8 0 NETWORK= 15253.19 57 435.95 2.95 438.91 0.99 1.73 0.01 463.73 3.12 1064.5 34.8 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:35: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS '0:35: 0 (2100 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 300 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTEWLE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 617 1057 (8003, 3) 603 1032
( 3, 1) 1488.04 149 37.20 0,21 37.41 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 10 255 39.8
( 1, 3) 1910.92 191 47.77 0.27 48.04 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 7 327 39.8
( 3, 4) 6640.67 664 166.02 0.94 166.95 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 246 1138 39.8
( 1, 2) 4717.28 472 188.69'.70 190.39 0.99 242 0.02 1453.0 13.0 328 808 24.8
( 2, 4) 968.93 97 24.22 0.14 24.36 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 138 166 39.8
( 4, 5) 1730.24 173 43.26 0.24 43.50 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 168 296 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 600.83 60 15.02 0.08 15.11 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 102 39.8
( 4, 2) 829.98 83 20.75 0.12 20.87 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 52 142 39.8 0 NETWORK< 18886.89 78 542.93 3.70 546.63 0.99 1.74 0.01 422.48 2.86 951.8 34.6 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:40: 0 ElAPSEDTIMEIS 0:40:0(2400SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3ELAPSEDTIMEIS 600SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 1)
~ 633 949 (8003, 3) 683 1024
( 3, 1) 1554.70 155 38.87 0.22 39.09 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 3 233 39.8
( 1 3) 1959.52 196 48.99 0.28 49.26 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1
~ 5.1 2 293 39.8
( 3, 4) 7786.54 779 194.66 1.10 195.76 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 217 1167 39.8
( 1, 2) 5780.42 578 23'I.22 2.08 233.30 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 245 867 24.8
( 2, 4) 1511.05 151 37.78 0.21 37.99 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 137 226 39.8
( 4, 5) 2395.15 240 59.88 0.34 60.22 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 166 359 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 601.67 60 15.04 0.08 15.13 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 90 39.8
( 4. 2) 1036.03 104 25.90 0.15 26.05 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 52 155 39.8 0 NETWORK< 22625.08 100 652.33 4.46 656.80 0.99 1.74 0.01 394.23 2.68 826.0 34.4 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:45: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:45:0(2700 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ElAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 1)
~ 650 886 (8003, 3) 762 1016
( 3, 1) 1589.8'I 159 39.75 0.22 39,97 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 211 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 264 39.8
( 3, 4) 8668.50 867 216.71 1.22 217.94 0.99 1.51 0.0'I 905.1 5.1 210 1155 39.8
( 1, 2) 6842.97 684 273.72 2.47 276.18 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 159 912 24.8
2, 4) 2070.32 207 51.76 0.29 52.05 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 135 276 39.8
(
4, 5) 3068.95 307 76.72 0.43 77.16 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 132 409 39.8
(
5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
(
4, 3) 602.50 60 15.06 0.09 15.15 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 80 39.8
(
0.01 905.1 5.1 55 166 39.8
( 4, 2) 1248.25 125 31.21 0.18 31.38 0.99 1.51 0 NETWORK= 26075.94 123 754.54 5.18 759.73 0.99 1.75 0.01 371.15 2.53 693.3 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:50: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:50: 0 (3000 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 1200 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK,,MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 779 (8003, 3) 843 1011
( 3, 1) 1590.64 159 39.77 0.22 39.99 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 190 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 238 39.8
( 3, 4) 9506.39 951 237.66 1.34 239.00 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 206 1140 39.8
( 1, 2) 7751.93 775 310.08 2.79 312.87 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 68 930 24.8
( 2, 4) 2615.18 262 65.38 0.37 65.75 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 123 313 39.8
( 4, 5) 3733.84 373 93.35 0.53 93.87 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 95 448 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 605.50 61 15.14 0.09 15.22 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 72 39.8
( 4, 2) 1454.29 145 36.36 0.21 36.56 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 58 174 39.8 0 NETWORK= 29242 40 145 847.34 5.83 853.17 0.99 1.75 0.01 353.44 2.41 553.5 34.3 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 16:55: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:55: 0 (3300 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 1500 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 1)
~ 650 709 (8003, 3) 922 1006
( 3, 1) 1591 48 159 39.79 0.22 40.01 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 173 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 216 39.8
( 3, 4) 10364.50 1036 259.11 1.46 260.58 0.99 1.51 0.01 905,1 5.1 200 1130 39.8
( 1, 2) 8010.74 801 320.43 2.89 323.32 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 42 873 24.8
( 2, 4) 3146.47 315 78.66 0.44 79.11 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 74 343 39.8
( 4, 5) 4240.13 424 106.00 0.60 106.60 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 75 462 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 608.50 61 15.21 0.09 15.30 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 66 39.8
( 4, 2) 1679.04 168 41.98 0.24 42.21 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 59 183 39.8 0 NETWORK< 31625.49 163 910.80 6.22 917.02 0.99 1.74 0.01 338.11 2.29 454.7 34.5 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 0: 0 ElAPSED TIME IS 1: 0: 0 (3600 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 1800 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO.- MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VAI.UES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 649 (8003, 3) 1002 1001
( 3, 1) 1594.04 159 39.85 0.23 40.08 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 159 39.8
( 1 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1
~
5.1 0 198 39.8
( 3, 4) 11155.01 1116 278.88 1.58 280.45 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 201 1115 39.8
( 1, 2) 8244.07 824 329.76 2.97 332.73 0.99 2,42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 19 824 24.8
( 2, 4) 3663.68 366 91.59 0.52 92.11 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 25 366 39.8
( 4, 5) 4539.60 454 113A9 0.64 114.13 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 75 453 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 611.50" 61 15.29 0.09 15.37 0.99 '.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 61 39.8
( 4, 2) 1914.64 191 47.87 0.27 48.14 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 56 191 39.8 0 NETWORK- "33707.18 178 966.34 6.57 972.91 0.99 1.73 0.01 327.66 2.21 380.2 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17: 5: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1: 5: 0 (3900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 2100 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY 'TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 599 (8003, 3) 1083 999
( 3, 1) 1597.04 160 39.93 0.23 40.15 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 147 39.8
( 1 3) 1984.63 198 '49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1
~ 5.1 0 183 39.8
( 3, 4) 11967.74 1197 299.19 1.69 300.M 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 200 1104 39.8
( 1, 2) 8431.78 843 337.27 3.04 340.31 0.99 2A2 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 778 24.8
( 2, 4) 3877.94 388 96.95 0.55 97.50 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 5 357 39.8
( 4, 5) 4842.98 484 121.07 0.68 121.76 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 78 447 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 614.50 61 15.36 0.09 15AS 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 56 39.8
( 4, 2) 2153.87 215 53.85 0.30 54.15 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 40 198 39.8 0 NETWORK-" 35470 48 192 1013.24 6.86 1020.10 0.99 1.73 0.01 319.60 2.15 327.9 34.8 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:10: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:10: 0 ( 4200 SECONDS) ~ TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 2400 SECONDS LINK STATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL'ELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 557 (8003, 3) 1161 995
( 3, 1) 1600.04 160 40.00 0.23 40.23 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1, 5.1 0 '37 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 170 39.8
( 3, 4) 12757.85 1276 318.95 1.80 320.75 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 200 1093 39.8
( 1 2) 8439.51
~ 844 337.58 3.04 340.62 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 '0 723 24.8
( 2, 4) 3907.47 391 97.69 0.55 98.24, 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 2 334 39.8
( 4, 5) 5142.54 514 128.56 0.73 129.29 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 82 440 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 617.50 62 15.44 0.09 15.52 0.99 1.51 O.OI 905.1 5.1 0 52 39.8
( 4, 2) 2377.37 238 59.43 0.34 59.77 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 22 203 39.8 0 NETWORK= 36826.93 201 1047.27 7.05 1054.32 0.99 1.72 0.01 314.38 2.10 309.4 34.9 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:15: 0 ( 4500 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 2700 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDSNEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE, MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 519 (8003, 3) 1243 994
( 3, 1) 1603.04 160 40.08 0.23 40.30 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 128 39.8
( 13) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 151 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 158 39.8
( 3, 4) 13565.39 1357 339.13 1.92 341.05 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 201 1085 39.8
( 1, 2) 8440.35 844 337.61 3.04 340.66 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 675 24.8
394 98.42 0.56 98.97 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 314 39.8
( 2, 4) 3936.67 546 136.41 0.77 137.18 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 84 436 39.8
( 4, 5) 5456.37 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 5, 4) 0.00 62 15.51 0.09 15.60 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 49 39.8
( 4, 3) 620.50 4, 2) 2528.13 253 63.20 0.36 63.b6 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 12 202 39.8
( 35.1 0 NETWORK< 38135.08 210 1079.98 7.24 1087.22 0.99 1.71 0.01 310.10 2.06 299.9 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:20: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:20: 0 (4800 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 3000 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 487 (8003, 3) 1322 991
( 3, 1) 1606.04 161 40.15 0.23 40.38 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 120 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 148 39.8
( 3, 4) 14356.92 1436 358.92 2.03 360.95 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 200 1076 39.8
( 1, 2) 8443.35 844 337.73 3.04 340,78 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 633 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0,01 905.1 5.1 0 295 39.8
( 4 5) 5792.93 579 144.82 0.82 145.64 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 83 434 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 623.50 62 15.59 0.09 15.68 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 46 39.8
( 4, 2) 2576.94 258 64.42 0.36 64.79 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 11 193 39.8 0 NETWORK= 39321.12 218 1109.68 7.40 1117.08 0.99 1.70 0.01 306.75 2.03 297.8 35.2 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:25: 0, ELAPSED TIME IS 1:25: 0 (5100 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ElAPSED TIME IS 3300 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/- TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 458 (8003, 3) 1361 960
( 3, 1) 1609.04 161 40.23 0,23 40.45 0.99 1.51 O.OI 905.1 5.1 0 113 39.8
( 1 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1
~
5.1 0 140 39.8
( 3, 4) 15160.32 1516 379.01 2.14 381.1b 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1, 5.1 160 1070 39.8
( 1 2) 8446.35 845 337.85 3.04 340.90 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0
~
1 596 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 277 39.8
( 4, 5) 6126.10 613 153.15 0.87 154.02 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 78 432 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 626.50 63 15.66 0.09 15.75 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 44 39.8
( 4, 2) 2624.54 262 65.61 0.37 65.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 6 185 39.8 0 NETWORK= 40514,29 228 1139.55 7.57 1147.13 0.99 1.70 '.01 302.50 2.00 247.4 35.3 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:30: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:30: 0 (5400 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ElAPSED TIME IS 3600 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 650 433 (8003, 3) 1361 907 3, 1) 1612.04 161 40.30 0.23 40.53 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 107 39.8 1 ~ 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.0'I 905.1 5.1 0 132 39.8 3, 4) 15956.47 1596 398.91 2.25 401.17 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 80 1063 39.8 1, 2) 8449.35 845 337.97 3.04 341.02 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 563 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1
~ 5.1 0 262 39.8
( 4, 5) 6465.85 647 161.65 0.91 162.56 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 72 431 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00'.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 629.50 63 15.74 0.09 15.83 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 41 39.8
- 2) 2673.06 267 66.83 0.38 67.20 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 178 39.8
( "4, 1
0 NETWORK< 41707.70 237 1169.43 7.74 1177.18 0.99 1.69 0.01 298.52 1.96 156.9 35.4 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:35: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:35: 0 (5700 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD '3 ELAPSED TIME IS 3900 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 410 (8003, 3) 1361 859
( 3, 1) 1615.04 162 40.38 0.23 40.60 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 102 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 125 39,8
( 3. 4) 16706.10 1671 417.65 2.36 420.01 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 5 1055 39.8
( 1, 2) 8452.35 845 338.09 3.05 341.14 0.99 2.42 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 533 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 248 39.8
( 4, 5) 6764.37 676 169.11 0.96 170.06 0.99 1.51 0.01. 905.1 5.1 69 427 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 '.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 632.50 63 15.81 0.09 15.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1,0 39 39.8
( 4. 2) 2691.83 269 67.30 0.38 67.68 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 170 39.8 0 NETWORK< 42783,63 245 1196.38 7.89 1204.27 0.99 1.69 0,01 295.32 1.94 76.6 35.5 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:40: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:40: 0 (6000 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 4200 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DElAY TOTAL MOVFJ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 ~ 1) 650 389 (8003, 3) 1361 816
( 3, 1) 1618.04 162 40.45 0.23 40.68 0.99 1.51 O.OI 905.1 5.1 0 97 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.0'I 905.1 5.1 0 119 39.8
( 3. 4) 16762.15 1676 419.05 2.37 421.42 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 1005 39,8
( 1. 2) 8455.35 846 338.21 3.05 341.26 0.99 242 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 507 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 236 39.8
( 4, 5) 7049.62 705 176.24 1.00 177.24 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 42 422 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4. 3) 635.50 64 15.89 0.09 15.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 38 39.8
( 4, 2) 2691.83 269 67.30 0.38 67.68 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 161 39.8 0 NETWORK> 43133.92 248 1205.18 7.95 1213.12 0.99 1.69 0.01 293.60 1.92 44.4 35.6 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:45: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:45: 0(6300 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS 4500 SECONDS LINKSTATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVFJ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001 1)
~ 650 371 (8003, 3) 1361 777
( 3, 1) 1621.04 162 40.53 0.23 40.76 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 92 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 113 39.8
( 3, 4) 16762.15 1676 419.05 2.37 421.42 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 &7 39.8
( 1, 2) 8458.35 846 338.33 3.05 341.38 0.99 242 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 483 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 224 39.8
( 4, 5) 7326.56 733 183.16 1.03 184.20 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 14 418 39.8
( 5, 4) 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 638.50 64 15.96 0.09 16.05 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 36 39.8
( 4, 2) 2691.83 269 67.30 0.38 67.68 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 153 39.8 0 NEVAIORK~ 43419.86 251 '1212.37 7.99 1220.36 0.99 1.69 0.01 292.05 1.91 16.7 1 CUMULATIVEESIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:48: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 1:48: 0 (6480 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 3 ELAPSED TIME IS~ SECONDS LINK STATISTICS VEHICLE HOURS RATIO MINUTES/MILE SECONDS/VEHICLE AVERAGE VALUES VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CNTNT VOLUME SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME VPH MPH (8001, 1) 650 361 (8003, 3) 1361 756
( 3, 1) 1622.84 162 40.57 0.23 40.80 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 90 39.8
( 1, 3) 1984.63 198 49.62 0.28 49.90 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 110 39.8
( 3, 4) 16762.15 1676 419.05 2.37 421 42 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 931 39.8
( 1, 2) 8460.15 846 338.41 3.05 341 45 0.99 242 0.02 1453.0 13.0 1 470 24.8
( 2, 4) 3936.80 394 98.42 0.56 98.98 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 218 39.8
( 4, 5) 7462.94 746 186.57 1.05 187.63 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 1 414 39.8
( 5, 4)'.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
( 4, 3) 640.30 64 16.01 0.09 16.10 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 35 39.8
( 4, 2) 2691.83 269 67.30 0.38 67.68 0.99 1.51 0.01 905.1 5.1 0 149 39.8 0 NETWORK< 43561.64 252 1215.94 8.01 1223.95 0.99 1.69 0.01 291.30 1.91 3.1 35.6 MAX. CONTENT DURING EVACUATION 1 EVACUATIONTIME 1: 48