ML17279A234: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 60: Line 60:
P      sow J  F  M  A  M  J  J A S 0 N D        J  F M A M J      J A S 0 N    D CY 1Sbe                            10bT a    ACTUAL        o  10bb INDCYAVO CUMULATIVE                UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%
P      sow J  F  M  A  M  J  J A S 0 N D        J  F M A M J      J A S 0 N    D CY 1Sbe                            10bT a    ACTUAL        o  10bb INDCYAVO CUMULATIVE                UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%
J  F M A M J      J A .S 0 N D      J  F M A M J J      A S 0 N D CY 1 9bà CUMULATIVE CAP FAC This Month:            Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.
J  F M A M J      J A .S 0 N D      J  F M A M J J      A S 0 N D CY 1 9bà CUMULATIVE CAP FAC This Month:            Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.
0 H
0 H
I
I
Line 96: Line 95:
                                 ~ IO IIY ~ T T4ASLT 40AL 20
                                 ~ IO IIY ~ T T4ASLT 40AL 20
                                   ~ 0 J Y M A M  J'J    A S 0 H 0    J 2 V A          M  J J A S 0 H 0 CY  ~ ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month:              The  cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.
                                   ~ 0 J Y M A M  J'J    A S 0 H 0    J 2 V A          M  J J A S 0 H 0 CY  ~ ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month:              The  cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.
FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity. Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages. The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate. For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours of unscheduled (forced) outage per calendar quarter.
FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity. Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages. The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate. For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours of unscheduled (forced) outage per calendar quarter.
Forced Outa e Hours Force  utage ours + ours enerator    n  one HOUBS OF FORCED          WHP 2 OUTAGE TIME TOO Q    800 Cl A.OO Ch 8OO 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL F M A M J    J A S 0 N    D    J  F M  A M J J A S  0  N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE  WNP 2 BATE 1 DC' EK lal CP 0
Forced Outa e Hours Force  utage ours + ours enerator    n  one HOUBS OF FORCED          WHP 2 OUTAGE TIME TOO Q    800 Cl A.OO Ch 8OO 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL F M A M J    J A S 0 N    D    J  F M  A M J J A S  0  N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE  WNP 2 BATE 1 DC' EK lal CP 0
Line 115: Line 113:
The FY 87 goal  for MNP-2  is to not exceed one unplanned    ECCS  challenge per quarter.
The FY 87 goal  for MNP-2  is to not exceed one unplanned    ECCS  challenge per quarter.
UNPLANNED SAFETY                  WNP SYSTEM ACTVATIONS I
UNPLANNED SAFETY                  WNP SYSTEM ACTVATIONS I
I Cl J  F M A M J    J A S 0 N    D    J F'    A    M  J  J A S O N    D CY  '0 ECCS 96T AC POWER        QQg
I Cl J  F M A M J    J A S 0 N    D    J F'    A    M  J  J A S O N    D CY  '0 ECCS 96T AC POWER        QQg CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This  first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours. The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason.      This includes instruments on control room back panels.
 
CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This  first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours. The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason.      This includes instruments on control room back panels.
CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED                  WNP 2 ANNUNCIATORS 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 C) 1 10 I      100 c3 eo 7'0 Cl      60 lal 60            I 40            0 60            C 20 10            IL' 0
CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED                  WNP 2 ANNUNCIATORS 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 C) 1 10 I      100 c3 eo 7'0 Cl      60 lal 60            I 40            0 60            C 20 10            IL' 0
F  M A M J      J A S 0 N  D    J  F M  A M J      J A S 0 N D CY 19bb              MONTH CY 19'URRENT CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S                  WNP 2 OUT OF SERVICE 24 20 16 16 14 Q
F  M A M J      J A S 0 N  D    J  F M  A M J      J A S 0 N D CY 19bb              MONTH CY 19'URRENT CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S                  WNP 2 OUT OF SERVICE 24 20 16 16 14 Q
Line 163: Line 159:
D 4
D 4
2  4          2 J F M A M J J A S O N D              J F M A M J    J A S  O  N D CY 1966                      CY 1 OF SKRVICR      9'UT This Month:    Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko. 4; recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs; main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch; and condensate booster pump 2C  for oil  pump  repairs.
2  4          2 J F M A M J J A S O N D              J F M A M J    J A S  O  N D CY 1966                      CY 1 OF SKRVICR      9'UT This Month:    Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko. 4; recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs; main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch; and condensate booster pump 2C  for oil  pump  repairs.
PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management. After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.
PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management. After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.
The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's          written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.
The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's          written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.
Line 173: Line 168:
0+4 O.B 02 1
0+4 O.B 02 1
0 J  F M A    M  J  J A S  0 N D    J  F M A M J      J  A S 0 N    D 1 98F NKW        Qgg COMPLETED              QRI    REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS              WHP 2 IN ENGXNEERIN G 0    200 cg J F M A M J        J A S  0  N D    J  F'  A M J      J  A S 0 N D QS'7 HKW      QPg  COMPLETED            KR  1 REMAINING This Month:      A total of  725 PMR's remain backlogged  of which    401 are in Engineering.
0 J  F M A    M  J  J A S  0 N D    J  F M A M J      J  A S 0 N    D 1 98F NKW        Qgg COMPLETED              QRI    REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS              WHP 2 IN ENGXNEERIN G 0    200 cg J F M A M J        J A S  0  N D    J  F'  A M J      J  A S 0 N D QS'7 HKW      QPg  COMPLETED            KR  1 REMAINING This Month:      A total of  725 PMR's remain backlogged  of which    401 are in Engineering.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION The    Plant is responsible  for  implementing design changes within the plant prior to    drawing revision,  and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION The    Plant is responsible  for  implementing design changes within the plant prior to    drawing revision,  and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.
The    first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision. The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.
The    first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision. The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.
Line 182: Line 176:
C7 Vl O ~
C7 Vl O ~
  ~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D            J  F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd                        Y 19ST RECEIVED          Qgg  IMPLEMENTED            IEBRI T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month:        For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog  is 5,607 drawings.
  ~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D            J  F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd                        Y 19ST RECEIVED          Qgg  IMPLEMENTED            IEBRI T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month:        For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog  is 5,607 drawings.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below      depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and      a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.
PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below      depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and      a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.
(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.) The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.
(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.) The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.
Line 190: Line 183:
J  P M A M  J J A 2 0 H 0    J'  M A M J  J A 2 0 H 0              J 2 M  A M J  J A 2 0 H 0
J  P M A M  J J A 2 0 H 0    J'  M A M J  J A 2 0 H 0              J 2 M  A M J  J A 2 0 H 0
         ~WAIT  PLAN IMk            QQ9 AVE%  NS UPOATC                fjgg  AWAIT PLAN  IA,              AVE% VIL3 UPOATC This flonth:      For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.
         ~WAIT  PLAN IMk            QQ9 AVE%  NS UPOATC                fjgg  AWAIT PLAN  IA,              AVE% VIL3 UPOATC This flonth:      For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.
Plant                  En ineerin              Total Top  Tier                    470                        0                470 All Others                4,855                      282                5,137 Total                        ,325                  ~82                    ,607
Plant                  En ineerin              Total Top  Tier                    470                        0                470 All Others                4,855                      282                5,137 Total                        ,325                  ~82                    ,607 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs) may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency. The                        first  graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month. The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout                      of the monthly NCR's by category              (i.e.,    administrative/hardware).
 
NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs) may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency. The                        first  graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month. The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout                      of the monthly NCR's by category              (i.e.,    administrative/hardware).
MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE          WHP REPORTS J F  M A M I22lRG J J A 2 0 H D Qgg CL0220 J F M
MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE          WHP REPORTS J F  M A M I22lRG J J A 2 0 H D Qgg CL0220 J F M
                                                               ~A M J J A 2 VACIILDO 0  H D CUMULATIVE NON CONFORMANCE        WHP REPORTS 2, ~
                                                               ~A M J J A 2 VACIILDO 0  H D CUMULATIVE NON CONFORMANCE        WHP REPORTS 2, ~
Line 198: Line 189:
0 J F  M A 1I  J J A 2 0 H  ~    0    J F M A M  J J A 2 0  H D CY NLTIAATDI2            x  VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG          WHP 2 CATEGORIES ADO g
0 J F  M A 1I  J J A 2 0 H  ~    0    J F M A M  J J A 2 0  H D CY NLTIAATDI2            x  VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG          WHP 2 CATEGORIES ADO g
200 J F  M A M gag J J A 2 0 H D AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC            ~  HNKWAPC Thi s Month:      In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332. Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.
200 J F  M A M gag J J A 2 0 H D AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC            ~  HNKWAPC Thi s Month:      In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332. Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.
I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs) and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies. The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.
I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs) and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies. The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER) eNNP          2 100 70 50 O
LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER) eNNP          2 100 70 50 O
Line 208: Line 198:
  'I  ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~    ~~~    I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~o  ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~  I IOIKYT0TALI 2                              0        2      2        5    6      7        4      3        3      3        7 I 2              0      0 YEAR      TOINTE I              2      2        I      6      11    17      2l      28      31      8      37      44          2      2        2 I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      I e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~      ~~  I~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e  ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
  'I  ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~    ~~~    I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~o  ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~  I IOIKYT0TALI 2                              0        2      2        5    6      7        4      3        3      3        7 I 2              0      0 YEAR      TOINTE I              2      2        I      6      11    17      2l      28      31      8      37      44          2      2        2 I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      I e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~      ~~  I~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e  ~    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This Month:                                        A      total of zero                                  LERs were                          submitted in the month of March.
This Month:                                        A      total of zero                                  LERs were                          submitted in the month of March.
0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System        is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure.              For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal  of    230 man-rem    was    establ'ished.        The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.
0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System        is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure.              For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal  of    230 man-rem    was    establ'ished.        The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.
The bottom graph      depicts exposure distribution.
The bottom graph      depicts exposure distribution.
Line 224: Line 213:
VOLUME OF LIQUID                RADIOACTIVE '%PASTE WNP 2 4 C gl O r
VOLUME OF LIQUID                RADIOACTIVE '%PASTE WNP 2 4 C gl O r
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D          J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19db                      CY 1957 o  CURRENT MONTH            x    CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENTWNP%HOLE      2 BODY DOSE MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D          J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19db                      CY 1957 o  CURRENT MONTH            x    CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENTWNP%HOLE      2 BODY DOSE MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3
0 020 0 010 0 000 J F  M  A M J J A S 0 N D        J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19bd                      CY 19dT o  WHOLE BODY DOSE                x CUMULATIVE
0 020 0 010 0 000 J F  M  A M J J A S 0 N D        J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N  D CY 19bd                      CY 19dT o  WHOLE BODY DOSE                x CUMULATIVE FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure. MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01 ) microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.
 
FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure. MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01 ) microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.
FUEL RELIABILITY                (I1 3 1 )
FUEL RELIABILITY                (I1 3 1 )
MICROCURIES PER CRAM 1  SE 04 1  7E 04 1  eE 04 1  5E 04 1  4E 04 1 e3E 04 1  2E 04 1'. 1 E 04 1 OE 04 9 OE 05 S OE 05            tll 7 OE 05 S.OE-05 5 OE 05            0 4iOK 05              C 3.0 E 05            a a
MICROCURIES PER CRAM 1  SE 04 1  7E 04 1  eE 04 1  5E 04 1  4E 04 1 e3E 04 1  2E 04 1'. 1 E 04 1 OE 04 9 OE 05 S OE 05            tll 7 OE 05 S.OE-05 5 OE 05            0 4iOK 05              C 3.0 E 05            a a
Line 233: Line 220:


PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination. This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems. Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas. The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month. This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.
PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination. This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems. Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas. The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month. This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.
SQUARE FEET OF WNR              CONTAMINATED AREA 40 tai n  30 4 cCS g~~  20 10 J F M A  M  J J A S    0  H 0    J  F M A M J  J  A S  0 N  0 CY 1066                      CY 196T SOU ARK FRET
SQUARE FEET OF WNR              CONTAMINATED AREA 40 tai n  30 4 cCS g~~  20 10 J F M A  M  J J A S    0  H 0    J  F M A M J  J  A S  0 N  0 CY 1066                      CY 196T SOU ARK FRET PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant. Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.
 
PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant. Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.
PERSONNEL SKIN                  CONTAMINATIONS WHP 2 26 26 C/l 24 22 20 K
PERSONNEL SKIN                  CONTAMINATIONS WHP 2 26 26 C/l 24 22 20 K
16 C) 14 la Cl    12 10 6
16 C) 14 la Cl    12 10 6
Line 241: Line 226:


WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper. The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen. The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.
WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper. The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen. The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.
* CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I  aAoo O.OOO J  C  M A M  J J A 0 0 H  D    J C  M A M    J J A  O  0 H 0 o  ouoealv'I o4ne              sA"  oui~
CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I  aAoo O.OOO J  C  M A M  J J A 0 0 H  D    J C  M A M    J J A  O  0 H 0 o  ouoealv'I o4ne              sA"  oui~
DISSOLVED  WHO C OXYGEN                                                        COPPER wHP 2 Cu
DISSOLVED  WHO C OXYGEN                                                        COPPER wHP 2 Cu
                                                                           ~,OOO aooo aooo TO                                                                      acoo aooo aAoo g
                                                                           ~,OOO aooo aooo TO                                                                      acoo aooo aAoo g
O.COO O COO O ~ OO O OOO J Ã M A M J J A    O 0  H  0    J C M A M J J A O 0 H D                  J  C  M A M  J J A ~ 0 H 0  J  C  M A M J J A O 0 H 0 0  CuoiiCHT MOMECY ~ Coo          ~ wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO                  o    Ou CAY'OW                w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g
O.COO O COO O ~ OO O OOO J Ã M A M J J A    O 0  H  0    J C M A M J J A O 0 H D                  J  C  M A M  J J A ~ 0 H 0  J  C  M A M J J A O 0 H 0 0  CuoiiCHT MOMECY ~ Coo          ~ wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO                  o    Ou CAY'OW                w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g
J  C  M A M  J J A  O 0 H D    J C M A    M J  J A  O 0  H 0 DcolSH  $%ciA
J  C  M A M  J J A  O 0 H D    J C M A    M J  J A  O 0  H 0 DcolSH  $%ciA PLANT STAFFING The graph below  depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.
 
PLANT STAFFING The graph below  depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.
PLANT STAFF              P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I  480 420 410 400 580 5TO J  F M  A M J J A S 0 N        D    J  F M A M J        J A S  0 N  D 10bd CY ON                          CY 198T a      BOARD              AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month:    Budgeted  staff for FY 87  is 467, the actual    for March was 464.
PLANT STAFF              P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I  480 420 410 400 580 5TO J  F M  A M J J A S 0 N        D    J  F M A M J        J A S  0 N  D 10bd CY ON                          CY 198T a      BOARD              AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month:    Budgeted  staff for FY 87  is 467, the actual    for March was 464.
PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below  reflect the  monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff. This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring. The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.
PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below  reflect the  monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff. This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring. The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.
PLANT P EBSONNEL        WNP 2 TUBNOVEB 50 20 10 J  F  M  A M J J A S      0  N D        J  F M A M J J    A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb                          CY 1 QbV O    CUMULATIVE                    CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSOWNP          NNEL2 TUBNOVEB 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0
PLANT P EBSONNEL        WNP 2 TUBNOVEB 50 20 10 J  F  M  A M J J A S      0  N D        J  F M A M J J    A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb                          CY 1 QbV O    CUMULATIVE                    CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSOWNP          NNEL2 TUBNOVEB 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0
MOR    OPNS    MAINT      TECH    ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81  ~ 1 QbT This Month:    During March the plant experienced      a  turnover of three employees.
MOR    OPNS    MAINT      TECH    ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81  ~ 1 QbT This Month:    During March the plant experienced      a  turnover of three employees.
0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below          display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel      (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.
0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below          display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel      (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.
HO URS 0 F PLANT      WNP 2 OVERTIME 1 30 1 20 1  10 90 gg CCI bO CD g    TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0
HO URS 0 F PLANT      WNP 2 OVERTIME 1 30 1 20 1  10 90 gg CCI bO CD g    TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0
Line 263: Line 244:
PLANT PROCEDVRE        WNP 2 DEVIATIONS 280 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J  F M A M J J A S 0 N 0          J F
PLANT PROCEDVRE        WNP 2 DEVIATIONS 280 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J  F M A M J J A S 0 N 0          J F
                                                 ~  M A M J  J  A S 0  N 0 CY 1M5      CURRENT MONTH CY 1$ bV This Month:      During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.
                                                 ~  M A M J  J  A S 0  N 0 CY 1M5      CURRENT MONTH CY 1$ bV This Month:      During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.
NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below                                        depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total. The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to        each              violation.                            The FY 87 goal                                        for          WNP-2                is        zero violations of Levels                                                                    I, II or        III severity.
NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below                                        depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total. The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to        each              violation.                            The FY 87 goal                                        for          WNP-2                is        zero violations of Levels                                                                    I, II or        III severity.
NRC VIOLATIONS                        V/NP 2 60 TO 52 60 I
NRC VIOLATIONS                        V/NP 2 60 TO 52 60 I
Line 276: Line 256:
I I
I I
I LEVEL IY I 5) LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81                                                      Iff      NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN' IEVEL V I I) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A                                                        IIIII        SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfALGKEK I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~  I This Month:                                          For the month                                    of March, there                                        were zero                            violations issued against                    WNP-2 by                        the          NRC.
I LEVEL IY I 5) LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81                                                      Iff      NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN' IEVEL V I I) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A                                                        IIIII        SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfALGKEK I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~    ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a  ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    a  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~    ~~~  I This Month:                                          For the month                                    of March, there                                        were zero                            violations issued against                    WNP-2 by                        the          NRC.
STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below    depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET),
STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below    depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET),
and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.
and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.
Line 307: Line 286:


NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The  results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.
NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The  results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.
NRC EXAMINATION    WHP 2 (RO) 10
NRC EXAMINATION    WHP 2 (RO) 10 77 I
                                                                $$
77 I
lal B
lal B
65 Cl 22 1    1  1  1 0      0                OOO JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$ 6 FEB$ 6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED                  PASSED          gggg    F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION      WNP 2 (SR 0) 26 20        1Q    1Q 10 4  45              44  ~
65 Cl 22 1    1  1  1 0      0                OOO JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$ 6 FEB$ 6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED                  PASSED          gggg    F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION      WNP 2 (SR 0) 26 20        1Q    1Q 10 4  45              44  ~
Line 316: Line 293:
July, 1983              Cold License Exams    -  Phase  I October, 1983          Cold License Exams    -  Phase  II March, 1984            Retakes November, 1984          Mot License Exams December, 1984          Requalification    Exams May, 1985              Retakes January, 1986          Requalification    Exams February, 1986          Mot License Exams (1 Retake)
July, 1983              Cold License Exams    -  Phase  I October, 1983          Cold License Exams    -  Phase  II March, 1984            Retakes November, 1984          Mot License Exams December, 1984          Requalification    Exams May, 1985              Retakes January, 1986          Requalification    Exams February, 1986          Mot License Exams (1 Retake)
August, 1986            Mot License Exams
August, 1986            Mot License Exams
~ 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.
~ 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.
This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.
This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.
Line 322: Line 298:
QA AUDIT WNP      DEFICIENCIES 2
QA AUDIT WNP      DEFICIENCIES 2
40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D          '
40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D          '
F M A M J    J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd        CLOSED              REMA ININO IDENTIFIED                              Qggg
F M A M J    J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd        CLOSED              REMA ININO IDENTIFIED                              Qggg C
 
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.
C QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.
This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.
This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.
QA SURVEILLANCE        WNP 2 DEFICIENCIES 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I  M  A'M J    J  A S 0 N D    J F'  A M J  J A S 0 N    D CY 19SS                            REMA ININO IDENTII IED          QQg CLOSED        g3Pg
QA SURVEILLANCE        WNP 2 DEFICIENCIES 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I  M  A'M J    J  A S 0 N D    J F'  A M J  J A S 0 N    D CY 19SS                            REMA ININO IDENTII IED          QQg CLOSED        g3Pg
       '3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review    of industry operating experiences pertinent to                          WNP-2  is    accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG). This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry. The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis. The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.
       '3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review    of industry operating experiences pertinent to                          WNP-2  is    accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG). This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry. The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis. The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.
MONTHLY OER WHP      PROGRAM          STATUS                            CUMULATIVE OERWHPP2RO GRAM STATUS 2                                        2, ~
MONTHLY OER WHP      PROGRAM          STATUS                            CUMULATIVE OERWHPP2RO GRAM STATUS 2                                        2, ~
Line 340: Line 314:
200 J F M
200 J F M
* M  J  J A 2 0 H 0      J F M A M J J A 2 0 H        D AWAITIHO 2&IRA                Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month:        In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245. The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.
* M  J  J A 2 0 H 0      J F M A M J J A 2 0 H        D AWAITIHO 2&IRA                Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month:        In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245. The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.
SER/SOER  STATUS The graphs below are a break              out of the Significant Event Report (SER) and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER) status on a monthly and cumulative basis.
SER/SOER  STATUS The graphs below are a break              out of the Significant Event Report (SER) and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER) status on a monthly and cumulative basis.
SIGNIFICANTMOHTHLY  EVENT REPORTS                                    SIGNIFICANT              EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC
SIGNIFICANTMOHTHLY  EVENT REPORTS                                    SIGNIFICANT              EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC
Line 362: Line 335:
* S 0  H 0      J P'  A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 SSS                      CY ASST gg  ASSIOH20        gZ  CLOS20          9g 'WASOCCSS            o  tOTAl ASS OH CO CY ~
* S 0  H 0      J P'  A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 SSS                      CY ASST gg  ASSIOH20        gZ  CLOS20          9g 'WASOCCSS            o  tOTAl ASS OH CO CY ~
x  TOTAL CLOSC0            v  SACKLOO This Month:          For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged.        Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.
x  TOTAL CLOSC0            v  SACKLOO This Month:          For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged.        Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.
EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety. The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators: (1) the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2) the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.
EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety. The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators: (1) the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2) the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.
For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and                a  lost time accident rate of 0.7.
For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and                a  lost time accident rate of 0.7.
Line 375: Line 347:
OOA1 LOST TIME        ACCIDENTS WHF 2 LOST TIME ACCIDENT  2 RATE 2 OO ISO 2 Oo aoo 0 Jo O. 20 0 0                                                              aoo 0
OOA1 LOST TIME        ACCIDENTS WHF 2 LOST TIME ACCIDENT  2 RATE 2 OO ISO 2 Oo aoo 0 Jo O. 20 0 0                                                              aoo 0
J F M A M J J A S 0 H  D  J F M A M    J J A S 0 H    D              J F M  A M J  J A S 0 H  D    J F M A M    J J A S 0 H D CY  122~                  CY 12SF                                    0  wN<<S IKceelY sAYs          CY 12SFe    Ookl This Month:          During the month of March there was one recordable                          injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.
J F M A M J J A S 0 H  D  J F M A M    J J A S 0 H    D              J F M  A M J  J A S 0 H  D    J F M A M    J J A S 0 H D CY  122~                  CY 12SF                                    0  wN<<S IKceelY sAYs          CY 12SFe    Ookl This Month:          During the month of March there was one recordable                          injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.
C
C
     ~ ~
     ~ ~
Line 396: Line 367:
J A 2 0 H 0 COMBED J P M A M J QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M CY  ~ 042 CXP0OU II2 CY IPST D
J A 2 0 H 0 COMBED J P M A M J QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M CY  ~ 042 CXP0OU II2 CY IPST D
This Month:          In March the contractor headcount was 98.
This Month:          In March the contractor headcount was 98.
h I I ~
h I I ~
I 1
I 1
Line 418: Line 388:
  ~n    18
  ~n    18
  ~oVl 16 12 10 0
  ~oVl 16 12 10 0
J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N D          J  F  M  A M J J  A S  0 N D oCY 1986 IDENTIFIED            o CY 198T ON HAND
J  F  M  A M J J A S 0 N D          J  F  M  A M J J  A S  0 N D oCY 1986 IDENTIFIED            o CY 198T ON HAND C}}
 
C}}

Latest revision as of 07:21, 4 February 2020

Washington Nuclear Plant 2 Performance Indicator Rept.
ML17279A234
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/1987
From:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
Shared Package
ML17279A232 List:
References
NUDOCS 8704290316
Download: ML17279A234 (67)


Text

87042903i6 870422 PDR ADQCN 05000397 P PDR WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT March, 1987 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER 4N SUPPLY SYSTEM 40993.1A

)CT 1984

Prepared By Performance Evaluation WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT FOREWARD The purpose of this report is to furnish Supply System management with performance data in selected key operational areas. The data is graphically di splayed to provide visual trends and present comparisons with industry data, Supply System Corporate goals and WNP-2 plant goals. The report is anticipated to be dynamic. Indicators will be added or deleted, as appropriate, to define problem areas and display performance trends.

WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency Responsible

~of Re ort Or anization ~Pa e OPERATIONS Net Electrical Generation Plant Operations Unit Availability Factor Plant Operations Unit Capacity Factor Plant Operations Unit Equivalent Availability Factor Plant Operations Plant Thermal Efficiency Plant Technical Forced Outages Plant Operations Unplanned Scrams Plant Operations Unplanned Safety System Actuations Plant Technical Control Room Instrument Operability Plant Operations MAINTENANCE MWR Status Plant Maintenance 10 Preventive Maintenance Status Plant Maintenance ll Equipment Out-of-Service Plant Maintenance 12 TECHNICAL Plant Modifications Engineering/Rcrds Mgmt 13 '4 Plant Drawing Revision Records Management Plant Drawing Revision Backlog Records Management 15 Non-Conformance Reports Plant Technical 16 Licensee Event Reports Plant Technical 17 HP/CHEMISTRY Personnel Exposure Radi ological 18 Solid Radwaste Radiological 19 Liquid Radwaste Radiological 20 Fuel Reliability Radiological 21 Plant Contaminated Areas Radiological 22 Personnel Contami nations Radiological 23 Water Chemistry Plant HP/Chemistry 24 ADMINISTRATION Plant Staffing Plant Administration 25 Plant Personnel Turnover Plant Administration 26 Plant Overtime Plant Administration 27 Plant Procedure Deviations Plant Administration 28 NRC Violations Plant Administration 29

I WNP-2 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Table of Contents Frequency Responsible

~of Re ort Or anization ~Pa e TRAINING Student Hours of Training Technical Training 30 Classroom (Instructor) Hours of Training M Technical Training 31 NRC Exam Performance Q Technical Training . 32 UAL ITY ASSURANCE QA Audit Def icienc ies Q Quality Assurance 33 QA Surveillance Deficiencies Q Quality Assurance 34 Operating Experience Review Status M NSAG 35 SER/SOER Status M NSAG 36 SUPPORT SERVICES Employee Safety Saf ety 37 Site Support Contract Mods/Upgrades 38 Securi ty Securi ty 39 MATERIAL MANAGEMENT Spare Parts Contracts/Mat'1 Control 40

0 v,

C NET ELECTRICAL GENERATION The graphs below depict WNP-2's monthly and year-to-date net electrical generation in megawatt hours as reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission per Regulatory Guide 1.16.

MONTHLY NET ELECTRICAL WNP 2 GENERATION bOO Cll CC dOO N

C O

Vl 0

5~

le I

0 J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 10bd CY 1sbV' a ACTUAL SCHEDULED CUMULATIVE NET ELECTRICAL WNP 2 GENERATION O~VI C

I I

gx Lal J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CY 19bT a ACTUAL o SCHEDULED This Month: The plant generated 516,206 MWH's during the month of March, continuing to operate in single loop configuration due to exces-sive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date total electrical generation is 1,487,899 MWH's and the cumulative since commercial operation is 12,257,896 MWH's.'

UNIT AVAILABILITYFACTOR Unit Availability Factor is the ratio of the Unit Available Hours (i.e., the sum of the total clock hours during the period that the generator operated on line plus the total clock hours during the period that the unit was in reserve shutdown, that is capable of operating on line,but for some reason did not) to the total clock hours contained in the period. The result is multiplied by 100 to express the factor as a percent.

Unit Availabilit Factor = (Unit Available Hours)(100)

Tota C oc Hours s n Per)o The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Availability Factor for WNP-2 as it relates to the 1985 industry average for BWRs.

U NIT AVAILABILITY WNP 2 FACTO B 1 20%

110%

1 O0%

g &O%

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 1QSd CY 1 987 a ACTUAL 198d IHD AVO This Month: Unit availability for the month of March was 92.29%. The year-to-date unit availability is 91.43'X and the cumulative since commercial operation is 77.12%.

UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR Unit Capacity Factor is the ratio of the net electrical energy generated during a given period of time to the maximum dependable capacity (MDC), times the total number of clock hours during the period.

- Unit acit Factor Net Electrical Ener Generated x 100 i e Ca =

Maximum Dependable Capacity x Period Hours The first graph below depicts the monthly capacity factor as it relates to the 1985 industry averages for BWRs. The second graph depicts the cumulative capacity factor from commercial"operation through the current month.

UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR 1 2C%

1 1 O%

1 00%

BC'C%

b~

bO%

P sow J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Sbe 10bT a ACTUAL o 10bb INDCYAVO CUMULATIVE UNIT CAPACITY FACT OR DECEMbER 1bi1 Ob4 T0 PRESENT 1 00%

J F M A M J J A .S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9bà CUMULATIVE CAP FAC This Month: Unit capacity factor for March was 63.36%, due to reduced power output while operating in single loop configuration because of excessive vibration of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date capacity factor is 62.91% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 55.64%.

0 H

I

'I

UNIT EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITYFACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor is the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at a maximum capacity. Discretionary operations below maximum permitted power for economic reasons such as reserve shutdowns do not reduce equivalent availability.

Gross Available Equi valent Unit Equi valent Seasonal Maximum Hours - Derated Hours - Derated Hours Capacity EAF = x 100%

Gross Maximum Capacity x en od Hours The graph below depicts the monthly Unit Equivalent Availability Factor of MNP-2 as it relates to the plant's FY 87 goal of 7(5. Per INPO, the 1985 industry average was 63.8'X.

EQUIVALENT UNIT E AVAILABILITYFACT OR WHP 2

'1 1C%

1 OC%

QC%

g SC%

7C%

SC%

SC%

Pg 4C%

I 5 SC%

2C%

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CY 1N7 a CURRENT MOHTH o WHP 2 COAL This Month: The unit equivalent availability factor for March was 66.74K, operating in single loop configuration due to excessive vibra-tion of "A" recirculating pump. The year-to-date equivalent availability factor is 64.6% and the cumulative since commercial operation is 59.49%.

PLANT THERl1AL EFFICIENCY The graphs below depict the monthly and cumulative heat rate (BTUs/Kwhr) since commercial operation. The third graph presents the plant's thermal efficiency expressed as a percent of the calculated design performance.

For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to maintain an overall plant thermal efficiency that will be better than 96% of the design thermal efficiency.

PLANT TIIERMAL WHA>>2 PERFORMANCE PLANT THERMAL WHd<<2 PERFORMANCE

~ 0.$ $

~ 0. $ A 22 ~ 0 $$

20 ~ Ck. $ 2

~ ddd MDUSTIIY AVCSAOC ld TO.$ l

~ 4 ~ ~ 0.$

SIN Y SYSTCM YYSY COAL

~ 0 ~ 0 2Y ld 2$

ld 2A 2 ld 2$

~ 0 22 J 2 V A V J J A S 0 H 0 J T V A V J J A S 0 H D J F II A V J J A S 0 H 0 J 2 V A M J J

  • S 0 H D CY ~ 444 CUSIICHT MOHTH 0 CUMGL O'Ad SIDUSTdf AVVIIAOC PLANT THERMAL WHA 2 EFFICIENCY F 20

~ IO IIY ~ T T4ASLT 40AL 20

~ 0 J Y M A M J'J A S 0 H 0 J 2 V A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY ~ ddd Qgg CUSIICHT MOHTH This month: The cumulative heat rate since commercial operation is 10238.36 BTU/Kwhr.

FORCED OUTAGES Forced outage time includes the collective time the unit is forced into a shutdown or outage mode and is not available to generate electricity. Forced outages do not include planned load reductions or scheduled outages. The graphs below depict the time in hours during each month that the unit was in a forced outage condition and the resulting forced outage rate. For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to not exceed 288 hours0.00333 days <br />0.08 hours <br />4.761905e-4 weeks <br />1.09584e-4 months <br /> of unscheduled (forced) outage per calendar quarter.

Forced Outa e Hours Force utage ours + ours enerator n one HOUBS OF FORCED WHP 2 OUTAGE TIME TOO Q 800 Cl A.OO Ch 8OO 200 1/12 YEARLY GOAL F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 98T Qgg FORCED OUTAOE HOURS FOBCED OUTAGE WNP 2 BATE 1 DC' EK lal CP 0

Ch O

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 1 98T QQg CURRENT MONTH 4

5 This Month: During the month of March, there were 57.33 forced outage hours for a forced outage rate of 8%.

UNPLANNED SCRAMS An unplanned scram is defined as the actuation of the reactor protection system that results in a scram signal any time the reactor is critical. The signal may be automatically initiated as the result of exceeding a setpoint or manually initiated by the control room operator depressing the scram button.

The graph below depicts the number of unplanned scrams, both manual and automatic, that occurred while the reactor was critical and required the initiation of a Licensee Event Report. Scrams that are planned as part of special evolutions or tests are not included in this indicator.

For FY 87, the MNP-2 goal is to not exceed three unplanned scrams during the fiscal year. Per INPO, the 1986 industry average was 3.9 scrams per unit.

UNPLANNED WNP 2 SCBAMS 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N 0 Qdd CY 1sd7

%26 MANUAL Qg3g AUTO MAYIC This Month: During the month of March, there was one unplanned manual scram.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS An Unplanned Safety System Actuation is defined as an event or condition that results in an unplanned manual or automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF). The two major ESF systems included in this indicator are the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) and the Emergency AC Power system.

ECCS actuations are the result of reaching a setpoint which activates one of the following systems: automatic depressurization system, high pressure core spray, low pressure coolant injection and low pressure core spray systems.

Emergency AC power actuations are a result of loss of a safeguards bus.

The graph below depicts the number of unplanned actuations of the ECCS and Emergency AC Power Systems only.

The FY 87 goal for MNP-2 is to not exceed one unplanned ECCS challenge per quarter.

UNPLANNED SAFETY WNP SYSTEM ACTVATIONS I

I Cl J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S O N D CY '0 ECCS 96T AC POWER QQg CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENT OPERABILITY This first" graph below depicts the number of control room annunciators activated during plant operation while at power for a duration exceeding 24 consecutive hours. The second graph depicts the number of control room instruments that are not performing their design function, regardless of the reason. This includes instruments on control room back panels.

CONTINUOUSLY ACTIVATED WNP 2 ANNUNCIATORS 1 60 1 40 160 1 20 C) 1 10 I 100 c3 eo 7'0 Cl 60 lal 60 I 40 0 60 C 20 10 IL' 0

F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bb MONTH CY 19'URRENT CONTROL BOOM INSTR'S WNP 2 OUT OF SERVICE 24 20 16 16 14 Q

12 III Cl 10 Q I 5 6 6 0 C

ll K

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 1 96T OUT OF SERVICE

MAINTENANCE WORK RE(VEST STATUS The Maintenance Work Request (MWR) is the document control used to initiate and record maintenance activities and plant modifications performed by the Plant Maintenance staff at the plant site. The monthly status of the WNP-2 MWRs (i.e., those issued, closed, and remaining open at month's end) is graphically displayed below. Also depicted is a breakout of MWRs requiring outage conditions to complete. Preventive maintenance items are not included as a part of MWRs.

MAINTENANCE WORK REQUEST STATUS

~ ,~

~ ,5

~ ,4

~ 2

~ 2 I ~

Ij 05 04 05 02 0 I 0

J J A 5 0 H 0

~

J F M A M gag 125IscP ~

J J A 5 0 H D cs.Deco J P M A M gag X%+5<<HO OUTAGE 8c NONOUTAGE WHP 2 MWR BACKLOG

~ .5

~ 5

~ A

~ 2 OA 02 02 0 1 0

J P M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 J II' A M J J A 5 0 H D

~ 5~

0 5ACICLQ OUTA OC e OT4ovfAo2 CLASS-I MWR'SWHPIN2 THE BACKLOG

~,5

~,5 IA I 2

~ 2 0.5 O,A O.a 02 0 I 0

J 5 M A M J J A 5 0 H D J F M A LI J J A 5 0 H D aA CII100 C~C" -'f5~

This Month: During the month of March, 443 MWRs were issued, 342 closed, with a total of 1,442 remaining open including 686 that require an outage to complete.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STATUS Preventive Maintenance (PM) is maintenance which is scheduled and performed on a routine basis to preclude costly and unplanned breakdowns of operating equipment. PM is controlled by a computerized card system which lists the PM to be performed on each piece of equipment, along with the date it is due.

The graph below depicts the monthly manhours of PM work scheduled, completed, and backlogged by the WNP-2 Plant Maintenance organization.

PBEVENTXVE MAXNTENANCE WNP 2 STATUS C/l vs

o. o X

~ o Rs J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY HE DU LE D COMPLETED 196'C Qgg SACK LOO This Month: During the month of March, 5,620 hours0.00718 days <br />0.172 hours <br />0.00103 weeks <br />2.3591e-4 months <br /> of PM work were scheduled, 1,987 PM hours were completed, with a total of 6,582 remaining in backlog.

- 11

EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE Out of service equipment is categorized as that hardware which if removed from service would have an impact on Plant Availability or Plant Capacity Factors.

The graph below depict the numbers of major pieces of hardware that were out of service during each month.

EQUIPMENT OUT WHP 2 OF SERVICE 26 24 22 20 I

16 C7 14 4 12 Ql CA Cl 1O C

I C1 0

D 4

2 4 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D CY 1966 CY 1 OF SKRVICR 9'UT This Month: Equipment out of service during March included the main turbine governor valve ko. 4; recirculation pump lA due to excessive vibration; reactor feedwater master level controller for repairs; main generator motor operated disconnect switch for repair of faulty position switch; and condensate booster pump 2C for oil pump repairs.

PLANT MODIFICATIONS Modifications to plant structures, systems, components and computer systems software are initiated by submitting modification requests to applicable plant management. After evaluation and review by the plant staff, approved proposals requiring design packages are forwarded to the Site Engineering Manager.

The graphs below depict the status of the total number of PMR's written for WNP-2 and a breakout of those PMR's assigned to Engineering.

TOTAL PLANTWNP MODIFICATIONS 2

1 2 C/l C)

C)

O 0 06 0T gg I W

0 6 0.%

0+4 O.B 02 1

0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1 98F NKW Qgg COMPLETED QRI REMAINING PLANT MODIFXCATXONS WHP 2 IN ENGXNEERIN G 0 200 cg J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S 0 N D QS'7 HKW QPg COMPLETED KR 1 REMAINING This Month: A total of 725 PMR's remain backlogged of which 401 are in Engineering.

PLANT DRAWING REVISION The Plant is responsible for implementing design changes within the plant prior to drawing revision, and Engineering is responsible for drawing revision once the associated design changes have been implemented within the plant.

The first graph depicts the total number of drawings received by Engineering for revision, the drawings revised, and those awaiting revision. The second graph depicts the number of drawing revisions received by the Plant for implementation, the drawing revisions implemented within the plant, and those which remain to be revised once design changes have been implemented.

TOTAL DBAWING BEVISIONS ENGINEEBING WNP 2 ire

~Do CS ZDO 0

2OO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 9ST RECEIVED ling REVISED AWAITINO REVISION TOTAL DBAWING WNP REVISIONS PLANT 2

t/l x

C7 Vl O ~

~I J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd Y 19ST RECEIVED Qgg IMPLEMENTED IEBRI T0 BE IMPI EMENTED This Month: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog is 5,607 drawings.

PLANT DRAWING REVISION BACKLOG The graphs below depict the composition of the total drawing revision backlog for Top Tier and a~'ther drawings and the revision status of those drawings.

(Top Tier drawings are those used by the Control Room Operators to perform the day-to-day operation of the plant.) The drawing revision backlog is comprised of the number of drawings awaiting revision by Engineering and drawings to be revised once Plant has implemented associated design changes within the plant.

DRAWING REVISION WHP BACKLOG COMPOSITION 2

2 RJ J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J ~' A M J J A 2 0 H 0 gg POETIC II Qgg AIJ OTH5 TOP TIER DRAWING BACKLOG STATUS ALL OTHER DRAWING WHP 2 BACKLOG STATUS WHP 2 2

~ COO RJ 2

J P M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J' M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0

~WAIT PLAN IMk QQ9 AVE% NS UPOATC fjgg AWAIT PLAN IA, AVE% VIL3 UPOATC This flonth: For the month of March the total drawing revision backlog consists of 5,607 drawings.

Plant En ineerin Total Top Tier 470 0 470 All Others 4,855 282 5,137 Total ,325 ~82 ,607 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS Nonconformance reports (NCRs) may be issued by any employee to identify a hardware or nonhardware-related deficiency. The first graph depicts the number of WNP-2 NCRs issued, closed, and in backlog for each month. The second and third graphs depict cumulative year-to-date NCR's and a breakout of the monthly NCR's by category (i.e., administrative/hardware).

MONTHLY NONCONFORMANCE WHP REPORTS J F M A M I22lRG J J A 2 0 H D Qgg CL0220 J F M

~A M J J A 2 VACIILDO 0 H D CUMULATIVE NON CONFORMANCE WHP REPORTS 2, ~

2 4 2 2 2

0 J F M A 1I J J A 2 0 H ~ 0 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D CY NLTIAATDI2 x VACIF400 NCR BACKLOG WHP 2 CATEGORIES ADO g

200 J F M A M gag J J A 2 0 H D AbT4IHTt'PIIATIVC ~ HNKWAPC Thi s Month: In the month of March there were 24 NCRs issued, 38 closed, leaving a backlog of 332. Of the backlog, 122 were administra-tive and 210 related to hardware failures, malfunctions or deficiencies.

I LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Reactor licensees are required to report all unusual occurrences to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These reports are called Licensee Event Reports (LERs) and cover a wide range of occurrences, including equipment failures, personnel errors and plant emergencies. The graph below tracks the LERs as they are approved by the plant operating comittee and transmitted to the NRC by WNP-2 each month, and a cumulative total for the year, along with a breakdown by category.

LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (LER) eNNP 2 100 70 50 O

Of.

eo 40 30 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 19115 CY 1957 o ISSUCD OC CUMULA'TIVS 1%I7 o I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I CATESIY I J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0 e J F N A N J J A S 0 N 0I I e f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ ~ ~~ oo ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e PHSRJ8. E89Ht I 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 I IjESIIfBINIIRIINSTAU.WI 2 1 1 2 1 2 I

EITHNL< I 1 e

IjEFICIHIT l%0CHjIIHI-9 I 1 1 1 I e

C0598P FAIUIE< I I I me-I I 3 I 1 2 2 1 I 1

'I ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ I IOIKYT0TALI 2 0 2 2 5 6 7 4 3 3 3 7 I 2 0 0 YEAR TOINTE I 2 2 I 6 11 17 2l 28 31 8 37 44 2 2 2 I I e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooe ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

This Month: A total of zero LERs were submitted in the month of March.

0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE The Supply System is comitted to operating WNP-2 in a manner which minimizes employee radiation exposure. For CY 87, an upper bound radiation exposure goal of 230 man-rem was establ'ished. The following graphs depict the monthly and cumulative mern-rem exposure levels for all workers at the WNP-2 plant.

The bottom graph depicts exposure distribution.

MONTHLY EXPOSURE CUMULATIVE HHr-2 EXPOSURE YW1 2 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A 0 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A ~ 0 H 0 J t V A V J J A ~ 0 H 0 OY ~ SSS OY ~ SSY OY 102$

0 OY KtZ CALENDAR YTD EXPOSURE 2 DISTRIBUTION 2,A 2 2 2

o,s OA 0,2 0

HOHC R1R ~ 2R 2 SR 2 AR A SR Ci2ZI vARoH 21 ~ 1 est This Month: The monthly exposure for all radiation workers at WNP-2 in March was 4.653 man-rem.

SOLID RADWASTE Solid radwaste includes two products: (1) solidified radioactive waste which is the accumulation of radioactive products (sludge, resins, filter cake) removed by liquid and gaseous processing systems; and (2) contaminated solid materials (disposable gloves, smears, trash) generated as a result of mainten-ance activities. These graphs depict the monthly and cumulative cubic feet of solidified radioactive waste and dry active waste generated at WNP-2 and subsequently shipped off site.

For FY 87, WNP-2's goal is to limit the volume of solid radwaste shipped from the plant to 25,000 cubic feet.

SOLID, RADWASTE GENERATED DRY ACTIVE RADWASTE GENERATED WHO-2 WHO 2 J 2 M A M J J A $ 0 H D J F M A M J J A $ 0 H 0 J t M A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 CY 1$ $ o$

J T' A M J J A ~ 0 H D CY ~ $ $ YOLAHT COAL CY 1$ $ $ CY ~ $ 27 o MOHTIO Y CUMULATIVC o o MOHTHLY CUMULATIVC RADIOACTIVE WASTE WHO 2 SHIPPED OFF SITE J 2 M A M J J A 2 0 H 0 J P M A M J J A $ 0 H D CY 1$ $ ~$ CY ~ $ $ 'F o MOHTHLY CUMULATIVC This Month: Total radioactive waste (i.e., solidified and dry active) generated during March was 720 cubic feet.

LIQUID RADWASTE Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the production of radioactive liquid waste. Processing systems are operated to minimize the radioactive content of these liquids. The following graph depicts, the gallons of liquid discharged (without dilution) to the river from WNP-2, and also the liquid effluent whole body dose.

VOLUME OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE '%PASTE WNP 2 4 C gl O r

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19db CY 1957 o CURRENT MONTH x CUMULA'TIVE I IQUID EFFLUENTWNP%HOLE 2 BODY DOSE MREM~EAR LIMIT TECH SPEC 3 11 1 2 0 030 3

0 020 0 010 0 000 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19bd CY 19dT o WHOLE BODY DOSE x CUMULATIVE FUEL RELIABILITY This indicator depicts the average monthly dose equivalent iodine activity found in the primary coolant and is a precursor method for identifying fuel failure. MNP-2's Technical Specification 3/4.4.5 states that the specific activity of the primary coolant system shall be less than or equal to 0.2 (2.0E-01 ) microcuries per gram dose equivalent I-131.

FUEL RELIABILITY (I1 3 1 )

MICROCURIES PER CRAM 1 SE 04 1 7E 04 1 eE 04 1 5E 04 1 4E 04 1 e3E 04 1 2E 04 1'. 1 E 04 1 OE 04 9 OE 05 S OE 05 tll 7 OE 05 S.OE-05 5 OE 05 0 4iOK 05 C 3.0 E 05 a a

2 OE 05 E 1 OE 05 0 OK&00 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be CY 19S7 a MONTHLY AVERAOE This Month: Present monthly readings are greater than 3 decades below the Technical Specification limit.

- 21

PLANT CONTAMINATED AREAS Operation and maintenance of WNP-2 results in the gradual buildup of low level contamination. This is caused by requirements to repair equipment, to take samples, and to operate systems. Good operation and health physics practices are required to minimize the size of these areas. The graph below depicts the square footage of surface area contaminated during the month. This does not necessarily mean that the total area was contaminated all month because cleanup crews are continually working to maintain contaminated areas at a minimum.

SQUARE FEET OF WNR CONTAMINATED AREA 40 tai n 30 4 cCS g~~ 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1066 CY 196T SOU ARK FRET PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS This graph depicts the monthly number of skin contaminations incurred by all personnel working at the plant. Good work and health physics practices will be utilized to administratively limit skin contaminations.

PERSONNEL SKIN CONTAMINATIONS WHP 2 26 26 C/l 24 22 20 K

16 C) 14 la Cl 12 10 6

0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F' A M JJ A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 198T CUAHTITY This Month: There were five personnel skin contaminations during the month of March.

WATER CHEMISTRY This indicator includes three water chemistry parameters referenced in the BWR Owner's Group Water Chemistry Guidelines; i.e., Reactor Water Conductivity, Feedwater Dissolved 0>magen, and Feedwater Total Copper. The three top graphs depict the average monthly activity of these parameters relative to guideline achievable levels with an upper and lower guide for dissolved oxygen. The fourth parameter, Air-In-Leakage, depicts the average monthly activity relative to design criteria.

CONDUCTIVITY WHO 0 DOO I aAoo O.OOO J C M A M J J A 0 0 H D J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 o ouoealv'I o4ne sA" oui~

DISSOLVED WHO C OXYGEN COPPER wHP 2 Cu

~,OOO aooo aooo TO acoo aooo aAoo g

O.COO O COO O ~ OO O OOO J Ã M A M J J A O 0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 0 CuoiiCHT MOMECY ~ Coo ~ wo uooco OY 1OOT x OWO i.OWCO o Ou CAY'OW w@ouiMwc AIR IN-LEAKAGE WHO C CO g

J C M A M J J A O 0 H D J C M A M J J A O 0 H 0 DcolSH $%ciA PLANT STAFFING The graph below depicts the total WNP-2 plant staff on-board (permanent and temporary) as compared to positions budgeted and approved.

PLANT STAFF P EBSONNEL WNP 2 490 480 470 480 450 I 480 420 410 400 580 5TO J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 10bd CY ON CY 198T a BOARD AU TH 0 Rl ZE D This Month: Budgeted staff for FY 87 is 467, the actual for March was 464.

PLANT PERSONNEL TURNOVER The graphs below reflect the monthly and cumulative turnover of the MNP-2 plant staff. This includes personnel transferring internally (i.e., from one department to another within the 52000 organization) or transferring out of the plant organization as well as personnel terminating or retiring. The second graph identifies the department from which the turnover occurred.

PLANT P EBSONNEL WNP 2 TUBNOVEB 50 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1Qbb CY 1 QbV O CUMULATIVE CURRENT MONTH PLANT P EBSOWNP NNEL2 TUBNOVEB 24 20 1b 14 12 10 0

MOR OPNS MAINT TECH ADMIN HP CHEM MARCH 81 ~ 1 QbT This Month: During March the plant experienced a turnover of three employees.

0 PLANT OVERTIME The graphs below display the regular and overtime hours worked by plant staff personnel (52000 organization) and the overtime as a percent of the regular hours.

HO URS 0 F PLANT WNP 2 OVERTIME 1 30 1 20 1 10 90 gg CCI bO CD g TO 50 bO 40 30 20 10 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 19bV RKOULAR HOURS OVKRTlMK HOURS PLANT OVERTIME WNR 2 IN PERCENT 40 I

3O CD I

20 laJ 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19be CY 1 9b7 o ACTUAL W AU TH 0 Rl ZK0 This Month: A total of 6.72% overtime was worked by the plant staff in March.

PLANT PROCEDURE DEVIATIONS A procedural deviation is an ~aroved modification to a procedure which does not change or compromise its intent. Approved deviations occur (1) when the plant has undergone modification and the original procedure must be updated to reflect the change, (2) when procedures are being used for the first time during initial equipment and process startup,'and (3) when the plant systems are in a testing mode and require temporary procedure modifications to complete the tests. The graph below depicts all safety-related, approved plant procedure deviations by month.

PLANT PROCEDVRE WNP 2 DEVIATIONS 280 220 150 1 50 1 20 50 80 40 20 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F

~ M A M J J A S 0 N 0 CY 1M5 CURRENT MONTH CY 1$ bV This Month: During the month of March there were 34 plant procedure deviations.

NRC VIOLATIONS The graph below depicts NRC violations issued each month as related to WNP-2 operational activities, along with the cumulative yearly total. The table below the graph provides a breakout of the severity levels assigned by the NRC to each violation. The FY 87 goal for WNP-2 is zero violations of Levels I, II or III severity.

NRC VIOLATIONS V/NP 2 60 TO 52 60 I

Cl 40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1955 CY 198T o WEIOHTEO CUM o CUMULATIVE a MONTHLY

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~

I N6 I 1%7 I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~~~~~~~~ aeeee ~ a ~ e ~ e ~ ~ ~ ae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eae ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I SEVERITY I J F N A II J J A S 0 H DI J F II A II J J A S 0 H D I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aI ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I I I LEVEL I I LEVEL 11 I I LEVEL lll I I LEVEL IY I 11 4 5 1 I I I lEltEL Y I 1 1 -2

~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I

TOTAL) 0 0 0 1 0 0 $ 0 12 4 5 110 0 0 I TMTODATEI 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 4 16202526)0 0 0 I I IGEHIED YEA)ITODATE I 0 0 0 I 1 1 10 10 44 56 67 70 I 0 0 0 I I I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~

I LEVEL I I20) 616HIFICAHT LEVEL 11 I16) S16HIFICAHT VIRATIQ8 I)IVQ.V1% ACTUAL LEVEL Ill I10) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NE CNSE RI SISHIFICNIT GKESIL I

VIRATIQ8 IHVQ.VI% ACIlNL QI POTEHTIAL I)PACT OH TK POSLIC SESQ.TI% IH PEIILTIES.

PIEHTIN. INCT I IK PIRIC RESILTI% IH PNLTIES.

I I

I LEVEL IY I 5) LESS SERIQS VIRATIQ81 Iff NE HIRE TIQH NIMR GKBN' IEVEL V I I) VIRATIQ8 IIIGI NK IF A IIIII SAFEIY QI EHVINHHlfALGKEK I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I This Month: For the month of March, there were zero violations issued against WNP-2 by the NRC.

STUDENT HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the student hours of training provided for Licensed Operator, Non-Licensed Operator, Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET),

and Simulator training by the Technical Training organization.

TOTAL HOURS OFWHP STUDENT TRAINING 2

J J A 2 0 H J A 2 0 H D J P M A M gZPCJNWTI C D

~

J P M A M J 8Z Rt0 MAINTENANCE-GET-OTHER TRAINING LICENSED & NON LICENSED TRAINING WHP 2 WHP 2 J P M A M'J J A 2 0 H 0 J 1 M A M J J

  • 2 0 H D OCT Qg OTHCO gus CIYYCN'AO HOH-aMCHQK SIMULATOR WHP 2 TRAINING J P M A M J J A $ 0 H D J P M A M J J A 2 0 H D CY I PS ~ OIMULAT02 TPAIHIHO CY SPOT This Month: For the month of March, a total of 8,716.25 student hours of training were provided for Supply System and contractor personnel.

CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING The graphs below depict the total number of classroom (instructor) hours scheduled and the total number of classroom (instructor) hours actually provided for Maintenance, General Employee Training (GET) and other, Licensed, Non-Licensed, and Simulator training.

TOTAL CLASSROOM HOURS OF TRAINING CLASSIIOOI4 (IHSTIIVCTOII) HOIPIS

~ A

~ 2 I2

~ ~

0d O,A 02 02 0 ~

0 J 2 M A M J J A S 0 44 0 J T I4 A M J J A ~ 0 H 0 KI4CDVLSD gag %4FZ MAINTENANCE-GET OTHER TRAINING LICENSED 8c NON-LICENSED TRAINING cLA$$ $ 0044 (IHsTsvclos) Nouds cLA$$ $ 00LI (INsTsvcTCII) Hovlls 0 ~

0 A 500

~ M A M

~J J A 2 iENSDVLSD O II O J T' gyp A I4 J J A S

%49 0 H D J 2 M A M J J A S 0 H REI4cDVLSD D

~

J 2 44 A M J WclVAV J A S 0 H D SIMULATOR TRAINING cLA$$ $ 00M ($ 4$ TSvcTDS) HCVIIs MJJASOHO

~ QNSDVL20 J 2 M A I4 gag 9XATAi~

J J A S 0 H 0 This Month: A total of 790 classroom (instructor) hours were scheduled for the month of March, and a total of 1,020.25 classroom (instructor) hours were actually provided.

- 31

'4

'l

~

NRC EXAM PERFORMANCE The results of the NRC licensing examinations inclu'ding requalification, Mot License and exam retakes for reactor operators and senior reactor operators are depicted in the graphs below.

NRC EXAMINATION WHP 2 (RO) 10 77 I

lal B

65 Cl 22 1 1 1 1 0 0 OOO JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4NOV$4 DECd4 MAY$5 JAN$ 6 FEB$ 6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED PASSED gggg F'AILED NR C EXAMINATION WNP 2 (SR 0) 26 20 1Q 1Q 10 4 45 44 ~

5 1

0 JUL$ 5 OCT$ 5 MAR$4HOV$4 DKC64 MAY$5 JAH66 FKB$6AUC$ 6 EXAMINED Qgg PASSED @gag F'AILED NOTE: The following exams have been gi ven:

July, 1983 Cold License Exams - Phase I October, 1983 Cold License Exams - Phase II March, 1984 Retakes November, 1984 Mot License Exams December, 1984 Requalification Exams May, 1985 Retakes January, 1986 Requalification Exams February, 1986 Mot License Exams (1 Retake)

August, 1986 Mot License Exams

~ 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT DEFICIENCIES Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) audits provide an objective evaluation of plant QA processes and indicate the effectiveness and degree of implementation of the plant QA programs.

This graph depicts the number of audit deficiencies identified during each quarter, as well as those deficiencies closed and remaining open in backlog.

~

QA AUDIT WNP DEFICIENCIES 2

40 20 10 J F M A M J J A S O N D '

F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1 Odd CLOSED REMA ININO IDENTIFIED Qggg C

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE DEFICIENCIES Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance Programs are established by the Plant QA Manager and provide a means of reviewing and observing work progress and plant conditions to verify that actions have been, or are being accomplished as specified.

This graph depicts the number of plant surveillance deficiencies identified during the respective quarters, as well as those deficiencies that were closed and remaining as backlog.

QA SURVEILLANCE WNP 2 DEFICIENCIES 80 TO 60 40 20 10 J I M A'M J J A S 0 N D J F' A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19SS REMA ININO IDENTII IED QQg CLOSED g3Pg

'3 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW STATUS Review of industry operating experiences pertinent to WNP-2 is accomplished by the Nuclear Safety Assurance Group (NSAG). This includes Significant Event Reports and Significant Operating Event Reports from INPO, information letters from the NSSS supplier, and notices, circulars and bulletins from the NRC and industry. The graphs below depict the status of all reviews assigned, closed or backlogged per month on a monthly and a cumulative basis. The backlog is broken into two categories, awaiting review and/or awaiting plant implementation.

MONTHLY OER WHP PROGRAM STATUS CUMULATIVE OERWHPP2RO GRAM STATUS 2 2, ~

2,4 2 2 2

~ 8 g

0S OA 02 0

0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J

  • S 0 H 0 J F M A M ASSIOrR ~

J J A 2 0 H 0 J F CI.OSCD ~

M A M J J A ~

SACICIOO CY Isis AssIDCCD x CLOSCD CT ~PSSF WCX4DO OER PROGRAM WHP 2 BACKLOG 200 Q

200 J F M

  • M J J A 2 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A 2 0 H D AWAITIHO 2&IRA Qgg FOII l43ETA ACTIOH This Month: In the month of March, there were 37 reviews assigned, 38 reviews closed, with a backlog of 245. The backlog is comprised of 79 awaiting review by NSAG and 166 aw'aiting plant implementation.

SER/SOER STATUS The graphs below are a break out of the Significant Event Report (SER) and Significant Operating Event Report (SOER) status on a monthly and cumulative basis.

SIGNIFICANTMOHTHLY EVENT REPORTS SIGNIFICANT EVENT REPORTS CUMULATIVC

~ SO

~ 20

~ 10 1OO

~0 SO TO 4O SO 200 20 20 10 0 J J A S 0 H 0 J S M A M J J A 5 0 H 0 J 2 gg M A M ASSIOHCOCY J J A S 0 H 0 gag CLOS20 J P'

'gA M J J A S Q~ASOCSSS 0 H 0 J 2 M A M I

TOTAL ASS IOHCO \

x TOTAL CLOSC0 CY ISST v SACK400 SIGNIFICANT OPERATING EVENT REPORTS SIGNIFICANT OPERATING IV2 EVENT REPORTS M OIITHLY LAY

'U 20 20 28 TO 24 22 20

~0

\~

IA

~

~

2 0

I 20 0

4 2

0 J S IJ A M J J A S O H 0 J S M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J 2 M A M J J

  • S 0 H 0 J P' A IJ J J A S 0 H 0 SSS CY ASST gg ASSIOH20 gZ CLOS20 9g 'WASOCCSS o tOTAl ASS OH CO CY ~

x TOTAL CLOSC0 v SACKLOO This Month: For the month of March: 5 SERs were assigned, zero closed and 75 backlogged. Two SOERs were assigned, zero closed, and 18 backlogged.

EMPLOYEE SAFETY Effective operations result from, among other things, good work practices, including maintaining a conscientious attitude towards industrial safety. The graphs below present two personnel safety indicators: (1) the number of recordable injuries that occur at the plant per month by the plant staff (52000 organization) along with a recordable injury rate, and (2) the number and rate of lost time accidents by the plant staff per month.

For FY 87, the goal for WNP-2 is to not exceed 12 recordable injuries, of which no more than three will be lost time accidents thus maintaining a recordable injury rate of 3.0 and a lost time accident rate of 0.7.

RECORDABLE INJURIES WHF 2 AT THE PLANT RECORDABLE INJURY 2 INCIDENT RATE

~ 2 Oo

~ 2 OO

'1 ~ OO 1O Oo

~ Oo J OO 2 Oo 1I12 l(SADLY SOAL X,oo 1

~ OO aoo J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M

  • M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 H 0 CY 1SSY CY SSFe SCCOSDAKC MJVSCS 0 wN 2 tiheSHY sAYS

~

OOA1 LOST TIME ACCIDENTS WHF 2 LOST TIME ACCIDENT 2 RATE 2 OO ISO 2 Oo aoo 0 Jo O. 20 0 0 aoo 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D J F M A M J J A S 0 H D CY 122~ CY 12SF 0 wN<<S IKceelY sAYs CY 12SFe Ookl This Month: During the month of March there was one recordable injury at WNP-2 which was a lost time accident.

C

~ ~

b

SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT Support for outage and nonroutine mai ntenance activities are being provided by a site support contract. The graphs below depict the monthly contracted manpower, the regular hours versus overtime hours worked by contracted employees per month, the number of tasks bei ng worked on per month, and the cumulative personnel exposure.

SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT MANPOWER SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT HOURS WORKED WHP 2 WHP 2 220 2OO 2OO 200 220 2OO

~ OO

~ OO

~ AO

~ 2O 1 OO OO

~0 JO 2O 0 0

  • J J A 2 J P M A M J J A ~

CY IOOO 0 H D J P M CY M J J A 2 0 H I OCT D J F M A M J M OVAL J A 2 0 H 0

~

~ J P M A OY22TISZ M

4NL H D SITE SUPPORT WHP CONTRACT TASKS SITE SUPPORT CONTRACT EXPOSURE

~ 2CHTCI UOC YTD AT WHP 2 2

J A 2 0 H 0 J J A 2 0 H 0 J P V A M J J A 2 0 H J P M A V J Qgjg 2TAAT20 ~

J A 2 0 H 0 COMBED J P M A M J QQP IICVAMIHO J P V A M CY ~ 042 CXP0OU II2 CY IPST D

This Month: In March the contractor headcount was 98.

h I I ~

I 1

t

P SECURITY Security compensatory time is required to provide escort service inside vital areas and guard coverage for failed security equipment. The first graph depicts the number of hours that security officers were assigned to compensate for failed security access equipment and to escort non-cleared maintenance and outside service personnel inside vital areas.

The second graph depicts the number of Supply System employees and all other personnel (i.e., contractor, BPA, and NRC) that have been screened and granted unescorted access to WNP-2.

SECURITY COMPENSATORY HOURS WNP 2 2 6 4

2 2 1 b 1 6 1 4 1 2 0 6 0+6 04 02 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 19b7 TOTAL COM PENS HOURS UNESCORTED ACCESS WNP 2 AUTHORIZATIONS 1 b 1+7 1 6 1 ~ 6 1 4 O 1 gOC~ 1 2 I

<<n

~

09 0b 1

O~ 07 g~ 0 6 O.d 04 O.d 02 0.1 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1966 CY 1 967 SUPPLY SYSTEM ALL OTHERS This Month: A total of 705.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> were expended in March by the Security organization in compensatory support. Unescorted access to WNP-2 for Supply System personnel during March was 1,170 and for all others was 213.

SPARE PARTS The graphs below depict the line items of operational spare parts identified to be carried in inventory for MNP-2 and line items currently available in inventory. It is estimated that 25,000 line items will eventually be carried in the MNP-2 spare parts inventory.

SPARE PARTSWNP XDENTXFXCATXON 2

30 2d 26 24 22 20 r cn v7 18 16 o3 L

14 I~~ 12 10 8

J F' A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D CY 1986 CY 198T 0 TARO ET o IDENTIFIED o REMAIN FOR IDENT SPARE PARTS WNP 2 ON HAND 30 2d 24 20

~n 18

~oVl 16 12 10 0

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D oCY 1986 IDENTIFIED o CY 198T ON HAND C