ML17303A394: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULAT INFORNATION DISTRIBUTION TEN (RIDS)J" ACCESSION NBR: 8704130629 DOC.DATE: 87/03/30 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULAT       INFORNATION DISTRIBUTION             TEN (RIDS)
NO DOCKET q~FAC IL: STN-50-528 Pal o Verde Nuclear Station.Uni t 1>Ari zona Pub 1 i 05000528 AUTH.NANE, AUTHOR AFFILIATION BRADISH, T.R.Arizona Nuclear Pouer Prospect (formerly Ari zona Public Serv HAYNEBi J.G.Ar i zona Nuclear Pcwer Pr o Ject (formerly Ari zona Public Serv RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
J ACCESSION NBR: 8704130629           DOC. DATE: 87/03/30       NOTARIZED: NO         DOCKET q ~ FAC IL: STN-50-528     Pal o Verde Nuclear   Station. Uni t 1> Ari zona Pub 1 i 05000528 AUTH. NANE,           AUTHOR AFFILIATION BRADISH, T. R.         Arizona Nuclear Pouer Prospect (formerly Ari zona Public Serv HAYNEBi J. G.         Ar i zona Nuclear Pcwer Pr o Ject ( formerly Ari zona Public Serv RECIP. NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER 85-035-01:
LER   85-035-01: on 850525 5 060%I pump peT formance tests not reviewed within 96 hI per IWP-3220 of ASME Code. Caused bg procedural error. Procedures for surveillance program changed to direct all procedures to engineers. 4l/870330 ltr.
on 850525 5 060%I pump peT formance tests not reviewed within 96 hI per IWP-3220 of ASME Code.Caused bg procedural error.Procedures for surveillance program changed to direct all procedures to engineers.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR I ENCL TITLE: 50. 73 Licensee Event Report (LER) Incident Rpti etc.
4l/870330 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR I ENCL~SIZE: TITLE: 50.73 Licensee Event Report (LER)Incident Rpti etc.NOTES: Standardized plant.N.Davis'RR: aCg.05000528 REC1P I ENT ID CODE/NAl'lE PD5 L*LICITRA E INTERNAL: ACRB NICHELSON ACRB WYL.IE*EOD/DSP/ROAB.NRR/ADT NRR/DEST/*DB NRR/DEBT/EL.B NRR/DEBT/NEB NRR/DEBT/PSB NRR/DEBT/SGB NRR/DLPG/GAB NRR/DREP/EPB IAS/ILRB 02 RGN5 F ILE Oi EXTERNAL: EG8cG GR OHI M LPDR NBIC H*RR IS J NO1 ES: COPIES LTTR EtiCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD DAVIS>M ACRS MOELLER AEOD/DOA AEOD/DSP/TAPB NRR/DEST/ADE ERR/DEBT/CEB NRR/DEBT/ICSB t.'R R/DEBT/NT8 NRR/DEBT/RSB ERR/DLPG/HFB NRR/DOEA/EAB NRR/DREP/R*B NRR/PNAB/PTSB RES SPEIS>T H ST LOB B Y WARD NRC PDR twiBI C MAYSI G COP IES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 43 ENCL 41 1
                                                                            ~  SIZE:
NRC Form 355 (933)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)VA.NVCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPAOV ED 0MB NO.3160410C EXPIRES: 5/31/SS FACILITY NAME (II Palo Verde Unit 1'TITLE Iei Failure to Perform ASME Section XI Re uired Test Review DOCKEt NUMBER 11)0 5 0 0 0 5 2 PA E 1OF03 EVENT DATE I5)LER NUMBER (5)REPORt DATE (7)OTHER FACILI'TIES INVOLVED ISI MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR SEOVCNTI*L NUMBER Rl VISION NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES N A DOCKET NUMBER(3)0 5 0 0 0 52 585 85 035 0 1 0 3 3 0 8 7 N A 0 5 0 0 0 OPERATING MODE (5)~OWER LEVEL p p:gg:,";,:j c-.F+igvj 20A02(O)20AOB(~)Ill(i)20 ASS(c)(I)(5)20AOB(II(1 l(riil 10AOS(c)(1K(vi 10AOS(~l(1)(v)X ,20AO5(cl 50.35(cl(ll 50.35(c)(2) 50.73(el(2)lil 50.7 3 (e)I2)I 5 I 50.73(e l(2)(iiil 50.73(el(2)(tv l 50.73(c)(1)(vl 50.73(el)2) lvS)50.73(el(2)(viii)IAI 50.73(el(2)(vBII(SI 50 73(~)(2)lcl LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)THIS REPORT IS SVSM)tTED PURSUANT 7 0 THE REOUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR II: IChrce onr or morr of the followr'npf (ll 73.71(5)73.71(cl OTHER ISprcify in AOItrrtt Oelow rmtin Trit, HAC Form JSSAI NAME Thomas R.Bradish, Com liance Su ervisor (Ext.6936)TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 602 932-530 0 COMPLETE.ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCSIISED IN THIS REPOAT l13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC TURER EPORTASLE TO NPRDS RETRIIIP/EI c crr SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC TURER EPORTABI.E TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (Iel YES Ilf yN, ComPlrtr EXPECTED S(IPMISSIOIY DATEI X ABETRAcT I(imit to tr00 Iprcri, ir., rpproiimetrly frftrrn tinplr corer typrwnnrn linrD (15l MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (151 At the time of these events, Palo Verde Unit 1 was in Mode 2 at normal operating temperature and pressure.Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec)4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.
NOTES: Standardized     plant. N. Davis'RR:   aCg.                                 05000528 REC1P I ENT           COPIES                RECIPIENT          COP IES ID CODE/NAl'lE         LTTR EtiCL          ID CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL PD5   L*                         1      PD5 PD                    1    1 LICITRA   E               1            DAVIS> M                  1 INTERNAL: ACRB NICHELSON               1    1      ACRS MOELLER                    1 ACRB WYL.IE               1    1      AEOD/DOA                        1
This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.Twice on lhy 25 and once on June, 4, 1985, pump performance test results were not reviewed within the 96 hours required by IMP-3220 of the ASME Code.The cause of these events has been determined to be procedural errors in the routing of test data that caused review delay.Steps will be taken to eliminate these procedural errors in routing.8704130629 870330 PDR ADOCK 05000528 S PDR NRC Serm 3SS P f t NRC FoII>>I 344A 1943)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT{LER)TEXT CONTINUATION U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROYEO OMS NO 31SG-GIGA EXPIRES: EI31(88 FACILITY NAME 111 OOCKET NUMEER 11l YEAR LER NUMSER ISI 5'EQUENTIAL
              *EOD/DSP/ROAB             2    2      AEOD/DSP/TAPB                    1
@i>>NVMII A AKVISIGII MVMFFA PAGE 131 Palo Verde Unit 1 TEXT O'II<<4 Soscs iI IPFIsl<<E v>>RSI4'<<ISSHRC f<<III ALA'si IITl 0 s 0 0 0 528 8 5 0 3 5-1 0 2 OF 0 3 Palo Verde Unit 1 Tech Spec 4;0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASHE Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.
              .NRR/ADT                   1            NRR/DEST/ADE                    0 NRR/DEST/*DB                     0      ERR/DEBT/CEB                    1 NRR/DEBT/EL.B             1    1      NRR/DEBT/ ICSB                  1 NRR/DEBT/NEB                     a      t .'R R /DEBT/ NT8              1 NRR/DEBT/PSB                           NRR/DEBT/RSB                    a NRR/DEBT/SGB                           ERR/DLPG/HFB                    1 NRR/DLPG/GAB                     1      NRR/DOEA/EAB                    1 NRR/DREP/EPB               1    1      NRR/DREP/R*B                    1 IAS/ILRB           1    1      NRR/PNAB/PTSB                    1 02     1    1      RES SPEIS> T                    1 RGN5     F ILE Oi               1 EXTERNAL:     EG8cG GR OHI M           5    5      H    ST LOB B Y WARD LPDR                             1      NRC PDR NBIC H*RR IS J             1    1      twiBI C MAYSI G NO1 ES:
The results of the pump performance tests that took place on May 18, 1985, Hay 21, 1985, and May 30, 1985 were not reviewed by the reviewing engineers within the 96 hours required by IMP-3220 of the ASHE Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI.These events occurred while the unit was in Mode 2 at normal operating temperature and pressure.The following three events occurred that exceeded the required 96 hour review requirement:
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:          LTTR       43    ENCL    41
1.The Train"B" Containment Spray Pump (BE)was tested on Hay 18, 1985, at 1500 hours.The test results were not reviewed until 0928 on May 25, 1985.2.The Train"B" Essential Spray Pond Pump (BS)was tested at 0640 hours on Hay 21, 1985, but the ASHE review did not occur until 0934 hours on May 25, 1985.3.The Train"A" Charging Pump (CB)was tested on May 30, 1985, at 0212 hours.The ASHE review was not completed until June 4, 1985, at 1407 hours.In all three cases, the pump test results met acceptance criteria at the test time and all were declared operable by the Shift Supervisor.
 
The routing procedure, then in effect for completed tests was: 1)From Control Room to Drawing and Document Control (DDC), 2)DDC to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG)and, 3)SPCG to the reviewing engineer.The following corrective actions are being implemented to prevent a recurrence of these events.1.The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct DDC to forward all completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to SPCG.2.The reviewing engineers will be placed on the distribution list for all surveillance test schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.
1 NRC Form 355                                                                                                                                      VA. NVCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (933)
3.Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors (STAs)(Utility licensed and non-licensed) perform a review of the completed tests in the control room to fulfill the 96 hour review requirement.
APPAOV ED 0MB NO. 3160410C LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                        EXPIRES: 5/31/SS FACILITY NAME (II                                                                                                                        DOCKEt NUMBER  11)                      PA E Palo Verde Unit                    1                                                                                            0  5  0  0    0  5 2          1OF03
The STAs are onshift'>>IIC I ORM 5444 I9 83I I
'TITLE Iei Failure to Perform                          ASME    Section XI                    Re      uired Test Review EVENT DATE I5)                      LER NUMBER (5)                            REPORt DATE (7)                            OTHER FACILI'TIES INVOLVED ISI MONTH      OAY    YEAR    YEAR          SEOVCNTI*L            Rl VISION                  DAY                        FACILITYNAMES                    DOCKET NUMBER(3)
NRC Form 344A/9.83)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION U,S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM/SS/ON APPROVEO OMS NO 3/50 0/04 EXP/RES 8/31/88 FACILITY NAME II I OOCKET NUMSER ISI YEAR LER NUMSER'IS)
NUMBER            NUMBER MONTH                        YEAR N A                                0    5    0    0  0 52 585 85                              035
SE GVSNTIAL NVMIITR Pjcy, REVISION NVMPf R PAGE ISI TEXT///moro cpoco 8 ror/Ir/lor/
                                            )Ill(i)                0    1     0 3 3 0                8 7            N A                                0    5    0    0  0 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SVSM)tTED PURSUANT 7 0 THE REOUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR II: IChrce onr or morr of the followr'npf              (ll MODE (5)                   20A02(O)                                   ,20AO5(cl                                50.73(el(2) (tv l                        73.71(5)
I/oo aaWirw'///C form 3//8A'c/I IT/0 5 0 0 0 5 2 8 5 035 01 03 OF 0 3.Continued 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed shortly after completion, The original corrective action taken for this event involved the use of a label to identify ASHE Section XI tests.However, the STAs now perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility.
    ~ OWER                          20AOB( ~                                    50.35(cl(ll                            50.73(c)(1)(vl                          73.71(cl LEVEL p p              20 ASS(c) (I ) (5)                           50.35(c)(2)                           50.73(el)2) lvS)                         OTHER ISprcify in AOItrrtt Oelow  rmtin Trit, HAC Form 20AOB(II(1 l(riil                      X 50.73(el(2)lil                            50.73(el(2) (viii)IAI                    JSSAI
of misplaced test packages.No previous similar events have been reported.VRC IORM 344k 19 83l t 1 NRC Form 345 (9.53)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT{LER)U.Sr NUCLEAR SIEGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED OMB NO.31504104 EXPIRES: SI31ISS FACILITY N AM E (I)DOCKET NUMBER (2)PA 3I Palo V r TITLE (4I Failure to Perform ASME Section XI Re uired Test Review 0 5 0 0 0 5 2 8 1 oF0 EVENT DATE(5)LER NUMBE'R (5)REPORT DATE l7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (SI MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR SSOVSNTI*L AX IISVrcrOrs ssvMBEA f53 trvMBEII MONTH OAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES N/A DOCKET NUMBERIS)0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 OPERATINO MODE (9)POWE R LEVEL I10)8 585 045 01 0 3 8 7 N/A 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT 1 0 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR (I: (Chose one or more ol the forlowingl (11 20.402(S)20.405(~)II I II)20.405(sI I I I(S)20,405(~HI I(rill 20.405(e Hl l(Iv)20.405(el(IHvl 20.405(c)50.35 (c)(11 50.35(cH2) 50.73(e)(2HB 50 73(eH2)(ill 50.73(402HI(l)
:gg:,";,:j     c-.
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS I.ER 112I 50.13(e)LTI(lvl 50.73(e)(2(HI 50.73(el(2)
F+igvj           10AOS(c )(1K(vi                              50.7 3 (e) I2) I 5 I                  50.73(el(2)(vBII(SI 10AOS( ~ l(1)(v)                             50.73(e l(2) (iiil                    50 73( ~ )(2)lcl LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
IvS I 50.13(eH2) lvlllHAI 50.73(e H2 Hv(SHB)50.73 I~)(2)(el X 73.71(SI 73.7 1(c)OTHER (Specify in renttrett Oelow enrf ln Test, HIIC Form 3ESAI NAME Thomas R.Bradish, Com liance Su ervisor Ext.6936)TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 602 932-53 00 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC.TVRER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANVFAC TUREA EPORTABLE<<'g+v@P~..';.gg TO NPRDS Qi~<k~x~<<:.A+p,st
NAME                                                                                                                                                      TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE Thomas R.           Bradish,              Com    liance            Su    ervisor (Ext. 6936)                                       602 932 -530                                0 COMPLETE. ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCSIISED IN THIS REPOAT l13)
@4~4$%j>'."II.Iv~, I"gAC+~~j.-
MANUFAC            EPORTASLE                                                                      MANUFAC CAUSE    SYSTEM    COMPONENT TURER            TO NPRDS        RETRIIIP/EI                c crr SYSTEM    COMPONENT TURER EPORTABI.E TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED                (Iel                                                                  MONTH    DAY      YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (151 YES  IlfyN, ComPlrtr EXPECTED S(IPMISSIOIY DATEI X
.: SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED I)4)YES llf yes, complsre EXPECTED SVSMISSIOrY DATE)NO ASSTAACT (Limit to te00 speceL I~., epprosimetely Irfteen singre specs typewritten hnesl (15)EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE 05)MONTH DAY YEAR On July 3, 1985, Palo Verde Unit 1 was in Mode 1 and at 38 percent reactor power.Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec)4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.
ABETRAcT I(imit to tr00 Iprcri,  ir., rpproiimetrly frftrrn tinplr corer typrwnnrn    linrD (15l At the time of these events, Palo Verde Unit                                                        1  was    in    Mode 2        at normal operating temperature and pressure.
This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.Procedure 41ST-1SI10 was performed on the train"B" High Pressure Safety Injection Pump (HPSI)(BQ) on June 22, 1985.The pump test results were not reviewed within the required time limit of 96 hours.The cause of this is the same as in LER 85-035-00.
Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) 4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.                                         This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
Procedural errors in the routing of test data caused the review delay.Steps had been taken to eliminate these procedural errors but were not fully implemented at the time of this event.These steps'are now complete.NRC form 354 f f NRC Form 3EEA I8 83I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION U.E.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMSEESON APPROVEO OM8 NO 3lm~lOS EXPIRES: EI3l/88 FACILITY NAME ill OOCKET SSUMEER l2l LER SSUMEER IEI PACE I3s Palo Verde Unit 1 o s o o o 5 2 8 YEAR<<g 8 5 SEQVENTSAL NVM EN 045 rsLYresoN NVMPEN 0 1 02oF 02 TEXT III more soece II eoerwed, srse ddreoonNI IIII C Form OPIA'sI lit)Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec).4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.
Twice on lhy 25 and once on June, 4, 1985, pump performance test results were not reviewed within the 96 hours required by IMP-3220 of the ASME Code.
The results of the pump performance test that took place'n July 3, 1985 vere not revieved by the reviewing engineers (non-licensed utility and contract)within 96 hours required by IVP-3220 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI.This was discovered by the engineers doing the review.This event occurred while the unit was in Mode 1 and at 38 percent reactor power with normal operating temperature and pressure.HPSI"B" pump had been tested on June 22, 1985 at 1107.The required ASME review of the test results vere not completed until July 3, 1985 at 1212.This event is identical vith those incidents identified in LER 85-035-00.
The cause            of these events has                            been determined                    to  be    procedural errors in the routing of test data that caused review delay.                                                           Steps        will be taken to eliminate these procedural errors in routing.
At that time the following corrective actions were specified to correct the problem.1.The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct Drawing and Document Control (DDC)to forward all completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG).2.The revieving engineers have been placed on the distribution list for all su'rveillance test schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.
8704130629 870330 PDR        ADOCK 05000528 S
3, Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors (STAs)(Utility licensed and non-licensed)perform a review of the completed tests in the control room to fulfill the 96 hour review, requirement.
PDR NRC Serm 3SS
The STAs are onshift 24 hours a day 7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed shortly after completion.
 
The original corrective action taken for this event involved the use of a label to identify ASME Section XI tests.However, the STAs now perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility of misplaced test packages, At the time of this most recent event, the corrective action had not been fully implemented.
P f
This was determined to be the root cause of the event.In addition to the corrective action stated, the reviewing engineers will monitor the required surveillance test schedules and will alert DDC on the timeliness of review/requirements.
t
The ASME review was completed on July 3, 1985.The results of the review revealed that the HPSI"B" pump passed satisfactorily.
 
Therefore this event had no impact on the health and safety of the public.A similar event was reported in LKR 528-85-035.
NRC FoII>>I 344A                                                                                                    U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1943)
NsrC s SSNM 2SO+IO 83 I I l Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o.BOX 52034~PHOENIX.ARIZONA 85072-2034 192-00171-JGH/TRB/JHT March 30, 1987 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555  
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                    APPROYEO OMS NO 31SG-GIGA EXPIRES: EI31(88 FACILITY NAME 111                                                        OOCKET NUMEER 11l              LER NUMSER ISI                    PAGE 131 YEAR    5'EQUENTIAL @i>> AKVISIGII NVMIIA        MVMFFA Palo Verde             Unit       1                               0  s  0  0  0 528    8 5       0 3    5            1   0 2 OF    0 3 TEXT  O'II<<4  Soscs iI IPFIsl<<E v>> RSI4'<<ISSHRC f<<IIIALA'si IITl Palo Verde Unit                    1 Tech Spec 4;0.5 specifies                the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASHE Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.
The results of the pump performance tests that took place on May 18, 1985, Hay 21,            1985, and May 30, 1985 were not reviewed by the reviewing engineers within the             96 hours required by IMP-3220 of the ASHE Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI.
These events occurred while the                              unit was    in Mode 2  at normal operating temperature and      pressure.
The      following three events occurred that exceeded the required                                    96 hour        review requirement:
: 1.         The      Train "B" Containment Spray Pump (BE) was tested on Hay 18, 1985, at 1500 hours. The test results were not reviewed until 0928 on May 25,        1985.
: 2.        The Train "B" Essential Spray Pond Pump (BS) was tested at 0640 hours on Hay 21, 1985, but the ASHE review did not occur until 0934 hours on May 25, 1985.
: 3.        The      Train "A" Charging Pump (CB) was tested on May 30, 1985, at 0212 hours. The ASHE review was not completed until June 4, 1985, at 1407 hours.
In    all      three cases,              the    pump    test results    met acceptance    criteria at          the test time and            all    were declared              operable by the      Shift Supervisor.
The      routing procedure, then in effect for completed tests was: 1) From Control Room      to Drawing and Document Control (DDC), 2) DDC to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG) and, 3) SPCG to the reviewing engineer.
The     following corrective actions are being implemented to prevent                                      a    recurrence of these events.
: 1.        The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct DDC to forward                        all  completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to  SPCG.
: 2.         The     reviewing engineers              will be placed on the distribution list for all surveillance test                  schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.
: 3.         Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors                        (STAs) (Utility licensed and non-licensed) perform a                    review of the completed tests in the control room to        fulfill          the 96 hour    review requirement. The STAs are onshift
'>>IIC I ORM 5444 I9 83I
 
I NRC Form 344A                                                                                                        U,S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM/SS/ON
/9.83)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                    APPROVEO OMS NO 3/50 0/04 EXP/RES  8/31/88 FACILITY NAME II I                                                            OOCKET NUMSER ISI LER NUMSER'IS)                    PAGE ISI YEAR  SE GVSNTIAL  Pjcy, REVISION NVMIITR          NVMPfR TEXT /// moro cpoco 8 ror/Ir/lor/ I/oo aaWirw'///C form 3//8A'c/ I IT/
0  5  0  0  0  5 2 8 5    035                01 03        OF 0
: 3.             Continued 24  hours a day,                7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed                shortly after completion,                   The original corrective action taken for                this event involved the use of                  a label to identify ASHE Section XI tests.
However, the             STAs now    perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility. of misplaced test packages.
No    previous similar events have been reported.
VRC IORM 344k 19 83l
 
t 1
 
NRC Form 345                                                                                                                                                U.Sr NUCLEAR SIEGULATORY COMMISSION (9.53)
APPROVED OMB NO. 31504104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER)                                                         EXPIRES: SI31ISS FACILITY N AME ( I )                                                                                                                             DOCKET NUMBER (2)                               PA      3I TITLE (4I Palo      V    r                                                                                                                    0    5    0    0      0  5 2 8          1    oF0 Failure to Perform                              ASME        Section XI                Re    uired Test Review EVENT DATE(5)                           LER NUMBE'R (5)                                REPORT DATE l7)                            OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (SI MONTH        OAY      YEAR    YEAR              SSOVSNTI*L AX IISVrcrOrs MONTH                      OAY    YEAR            FACILITYNAMES                          DOCKET NUMBERIS) ssvMBEA          f53 trvMBEII N/A                                          0    5    0    0    0 0 7          0 3 8          585                    045                      01        0 3 3              0 8 7 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT 1 0 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR (I: (Chose one or more N/A                                          0    5  0    0    0 OPERATINO                                                                                                                                ol the forlowingl (11 MODE (9) 20.402(S)                                        20.405(c)                           50.13(e)LTI(lvl                                73.71(SI POWE R                              20.405( ~ ) II I II)                              50.35 (c) (11                      50.73(e) (2(HI                                73.7 1(c)
LEVEL I10)                            20.405(sI I I I(S)                                50.35(cH2)                          50.73(el(2) IvS I                              OTHER (Specify in renttrett Oelow enrf ln Test, HIIC Form 20,405( ~ HI I(rill                        X    50.73(e)(2HB                        50.13(eH2) lvlllHAI                            3ESAI 20.405(e Hl l(Iv)                                 50 73(eH2) (ill                    50.73(e H2 Hv(SHB) 20.405(el(IHvl                                    50.73(402HI(l)                      50.73 I ~ ) (2)(el LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS I.ER 112I NAME                                                                                                                                                                  TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE Thomas R.            Bradish,                    Com      liance          Su    ervisor            Ext. 6936)
COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) 602 932                          53 00 MANUFAC.
CAUSE      SYSTEM      COMPONENT TVRER                                                        CAUSE SYSTEM  COMPONENT              MANVFAC TUREA EPORTABLE <<'g+v@P~
TO NPRDS Qi~<k~x~<<:.A+p,st
                                                                                                                                                                                                      ..';.gg
                                                                                                                                                                                          @4~4$%j>'."II .Iv~,
I"gAC+~~j.-.:
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED I)4)                                                                                        MONTH      DAY      YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION YES  llf yes, complsre EXPECTED SVSMISSIOrY DATE)                                                                                                    DATE 05)
NO ASSTAACT (Limit to te00 speceL      I ~ ., epprosimetely      Irfteen singre specs typewritten hnesl (15)
On    July 3, 1985, Palo Verde Unit                                                1    was      in  Mode    1  and    at        38  percent reactor power.
Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) 4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.                                                 This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
Procedure 41ST-1SI10 was performed on the train "B" High Pressure Safety Injection Pump (HPSI)(BQ) on June 22, 1985. The pump test results were not reviewed within the required time limit of 96 hours.
The cause              of this is the same as in LER 85-035-00. Procedural errors in the routing of test data caused the review delay. Steps had been taken to eliminate these procedural errors but were not fully implemented at the time of this event. These steps 'are now complete.
NRC    form 354
 
f f
 
NRC Form 3EEA                                                                                                                U.E. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMSEESON I8 83I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION                                            APPROVEO OM8 NO    3lm~lOS EXPIRES: EI3l/88 FACILITY NAME    ill                                                          OOCKET SSUMEER l2l                LER SSUMEER IEI                    PACE I3s SEQVENTSAL        rsLYresoN YEAR  <<g    NVM EN          NVMPEN Palo Verde Unit                    1                                  o  s  o  o  o  5 2 8    8 5        045                0  1    02oF 02 TEXT IIImore soece  II eoerwed, srse ddreoonNI IIIIC Form OPIA'sI lit)
Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) .4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.                                    The results of the pump performance test that took place'n July 3, 1985 vere not revieved by the reviewing engineers (non-licensed utility and contract) within 96 hours required by IVP-3220 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI. This was discovered by the engineers doing the review.
This event occurred while the unit was in Mode                                          1  and at  38  percent reactor power with normal operating temperature and pressure.
HPSI "B" pump had been                              tested on June 22, 1985 at 1107. The required ASME review of the test results vere not completed until July 3, 1985 at 1212. This event is identical vith those incidents identified in LER 85-035-00. At that time the following corrective actions were specified to correct the problem.
: 1.       The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct Drawing and Document Control (DDC) to forward                                                  all completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG).
: 2.       The        revieving engineers have been placed on the distribution list for all su'rveillance test schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.
3,        Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors                                      (STAs)  (Utility licensed                and non-licensed) perform a review of the completed tests in the control room to fulfill              the 96 hour review, requirement. The STAs are onshift 24 hours a day 7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed shortly after completion.
The original corrective action taken for this event involved the use of a label to identify ASME Section XI tests. However, the STAs now perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility of misplaced test packages, At the time of this most recent event, the corrective action had not been                                                              fully implemented. This was determined to be the root cause of the event.
In addition to the corrective action stated, the reviewing engineers will monitor the required surveillance test schedules and will alert DDC on the timeliness of review/requirements.
The ASME            review          was completed on July 3, 1985.                       The results of the            review revealed that                    the HPSI           "B"     pump passed satisfactorily.            Therefore        this event had no impact                    on the health and safety of the public.
A  similar event                    was      reported in       LKR  528-85-035.
NsrC s SSNM 2SO+
IO 83 I
 
I l
 
Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o. BOX 52034 ~ PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85072-2034 192-00171-JGH/TRB/JHT March 30, 1987 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document   Control Desk Washington, D.C.     20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)Unit 1 Docket No.STN 50-528 Licensee Event Reports 85-035-01 and 85-045-01 File: 87-020-404
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Unit 1 Docket No. STN 50-528 Licensee Event Reports 85-035-01 and 85-045-01 File: 87-020-404
 
==Dear  Sirs:==
 
Attached please find Supplement Nos. Ol to Licensee Event Report (LER) Nos.
85-035-00 and 85-045-00 prepared and submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(d). We are herewith forwarding a copy of this report to the Regional Administrator of the Region V Office.
If you have any questions, please contact T.          R,  Bradish, Compliance Supervisor at (602) 932-5300, Ext. 6936.
Very  truly yours, J. G. Haynes Vice President Nuclear Production JGH/TRB/cld Attachment cc:  0. M. DeMichele      (all  w/a)
E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
J. B. Martin R. P. Zimmerman R. C. Sorenson E, A. Licitra A, C. Gehr INPO Records Center


==Dear Sirs:==
          )I. f
Attached please find Supplement Nos.Ol to Licensee Event Report (LER)Nos.85-035-00 and 85-045-00 prepared and submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(d).We are herewith forwarding a copy of this report to the Regional Administrator of the Region V Office.If you have any questions, please contact T.R, Bradish, Compliance Supervisor at (602)932-5300, Ext.6936.Very truly yours, J.G.Haynes Vice President Nuclear Production JGH/TRB/cld Attachment cc: 0.M.DeMichele (all w/a)E.E.Van Brunt, Jr.J.B.Martin R.P.Zimmerman R.C.Sorenson E, A.Licitra A, C.Gehr INPO Records Center
      -r I I
-r)I.f I I ff If II I I I (I}}
ff If II I
I I
(
I}}

Latest revision as of 04:35, 4 February 2020

LER 85-035-01:on 850525 & 0604,pump Performance Tests Not Reviewed within 96 H,Per IWP-3220 of ASME Code.Caused by Procedural Error.Procedures for Surveillance Program Changed to Direct All Procedures to engineers.W/870330 Ltr
ML17303A394
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/1987
From: Bradish T, Haynes J
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
192-00171-JGH-T, LER-85-035, NUDOCS 8704130629
Download: ML17303A394 (14)


Text

REGULAT INFORNATION DISTRIBUTION TEN (RIDS)

J ACCESSION NBR: 8704130629 DOC. DATE: 87/03/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET q ~ FAC IL: STN-50-528 Pal o Verde Nuclear Station. Uni t 1> Ari zona Pub 1 i 05000528 AUTH. NANE, AUTHOR AFFILIATION BRADISH, T. R. Arizona Nuclear Pouer Prospect (formerly Ari zona Public Serv HAYNEBi J. G. Ar i zona Nuclear Pcwer Pr o Ject ( formerly Ari zona Public Serv RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 85-035-01: on 850525 5 060%I pump peT formance tests not reviewed within 96 hI per IWP-3220 of ASME Code. Caused bg procedural error. Procedures for surveillance program changed to direct all procedures to engineers. 4l/870330 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR I ENCL TITLE: 50. 73 Licensee Event Report (LER) Incident Rpti etc.

~ SIZE:

NOTES: Standardized plant. N. Davis'RR: aCg. 05000528 REC1P I ENT COPIES RECIPIENT COP IES ID CODE/NAl'lE LTTR EtiCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 L* 1 PD5 PD 1 1 LICITRA E 1 DAVIS> M 1 INTERNAL: ACRB NICHELSON 1 1 ACRS MOELLER 1 ACRB WYL.IE 1 1 AEOD/DOA 1

  • EOD/DSP/ROAB 2 2 AEOD/DSP/TAPB 1

.NRR/ADT 1 NRR/DEST/ADE 0 NRR/DEST/*DB 0 ERR/DEBT/CEB 1 NRR/DEBT/EL.B 1 1 NRR/DEBT/ ICSB 1 NRR/DEBT/NEB a t .'R R /DEBT/ NT8 1 NRR/DEBT/PSB NRR/DEBT/RSB a NRR/DEBT/SGB ERR/DLPG/HFB 1 NRR/DLPG/GAB 1 NRR/DOEA/EAB 1 NRR/DREP/EPB 1 1 NRR/DREP/R*B 1 IAS/ILRB 1 1 NRR/PNAB/PTSB 1 02 1 1 RES SPEIS> T 1 RGN5 F ILE Oi 1 EXTERNAL: EG8cG GR OHI M 5 5 H ST LOB B Y WARD LPDR 1 NRC PDR NBIC H*RR IS J 1 1 twiBI C MAYSI G NO1 ES:

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 43 ENCL 41

1 NRC Form 355 VA. NVCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (933)

APPAOV ED 0MB NO. 3160410C LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) EXPIRES: 5/31/SS FACILITY NAME (II DOCKEt NUMBER 11) PA E Palo Verde Unit 1 0 5 0 0 0 5 2 1OF03

'TITLE Iei Failure to Perform ASME Section XI Re uired Test Review EVENT DATE I5) LER NUMBER (5) REPORt DATE (7) OTHER FACILI'TIES INVOLVED ISI MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR SEOVCNTI*L Rl VISION DAY FACILITYNAMES DOCKET NUMBER(3)

NUMBER NUMBER MONTH YEAR N A 0 5 0 0 0 52 585 85 035

)Ill(i) 0 1 0 3 3 0 8 7 N A 0 5 0 0 0 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SVSM)tTED PURSUANT 7 0 THE REOUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR II: IChrce onr or morr of the followr'npf (ll MODE (5) 20A02(O) ,20AO5(cl 50.73(el(2) (tv l 73.71(5)

~ OWER 20AOB( ~ 50.35(cl(ll 50.73(c)(1)(vl 73.71(cl LEVEL p p 20 ASS(c) (I ) (5) 50.35(c)(2) 50.73(el)2) lvS) OTHER ISprcify in AOItrrtt Oelow rmtin Trit, HAC Form 20AOB(II(1 l(riil X 50.73(el(2)lil 50.73(el(2) (viii)IAI JSSAI

gg:,";,:j c-.

F+igvj 10AOS(c )(1K(vi 50.7 3 (e) I2) I 5 I 50.73(el(2)(vBII(SI 10AOS( ~ l(1)(v) 50.73(e l(2) (iiil 50 73( ~ )(2)lcl LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE Thomas R. Bradish, Com liance Su ervisor (Ext. 6936) 602 932 -530 0 COMPLETE. ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCSIISED IN THIS REPOAT l13)

MANUFAC EPORTASLE MANUFAC CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT TURER TO NPRDS RETRIIIP/EI c crr SYSTEM COMPONENT TURER EPORTABI.E TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (Iel MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (151 YES IlfyN, ComPlrtr EXPECTED S(IPMISSIOIY DATEI X

ABETRAcT I(imit to tr00 Iprcri, ir., rpproiimetrly frftrrn tinplr corer typrwnnrn linrD (15l At the time of these events, Palo Verde Unit 1 was in Mode 2 at normal operating temperature and pressure.

Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) 4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components. This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Twice on lhy 25 and once on June, 4, 1985, pump performance test results were not reviewed within the 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> required by IMP-3220 of the ASME Code.

The cause of these events has been determined to be procedural errors in the routing of test data that caused review delay. Steps will be taken to eliminate these procedural errors in routing.

8704130629 870330 PDR ADOCK 05000528 S

PDR NRC Serm 3SS

P f

t

NRC FoII>>I 344A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1943)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPROYEO OMS NO 31SG-GIGA EXPIRES: EI31(88 FACILITY NAME 111 OOCKET NUMEER 11l LER NUMSER ISI PAGE 131 YEAR 5'EQUENTIAL @i>> AKVISIGII NVMIIA MVMFFA Palo Verde Unit 1 0 s 0 0 0 528 8 5 0 3 5 1 0 2 OF 0 3 TEXT O'II<<4 Soscs iI IPFIsl<<E v>> RSI4'<<ISSHRC f<<IIIALA'si IITl Palo Verde Unit 1 Tech Spec 4;0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASHE Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components.

The results of the pump performance tests that took place on May 18, 1985, Hay 21, 1985, and May 30, 1985 were not reviewed by the reviewing engineers within the 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> required by IMP-3220 of the ASHE Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI.

These events occurred while the unit was in Mode 2 at normal operating temperature and pressure.

The following three events occurred that exceeded the required 96 hour0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> review requirement:

1. The Train "B" Containment Spray Pump (BE) was tested on Hay 18, 1985, at 1500 hours0.0174 days <br />0.417 hours <br />0.00248 weeks <br />5.7075e-4 months <br />. The test results were not reviewed until 0928 on May 25, 1985.
2. The Train "B" Essential Spray Pond Pump (BS) was tested at 0640 hours0.00741 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.4352e-4 months <br /> on Hay 21, 1985, but the ASHE review did not occur until 0934 hours0.0108 days <br />0.259 hours <br />0.00154 weeks <br />3.55387e-4 months <br /> on May 25, 1985.
3. The Train "A" Charging Pump (CB) was tested on May 30, 1985, at 0212 hours0.00245 days <br />0.0589 hours <br />3.505291e-4 weeks <br />8.0666e-5 months <br />. The ASHE review was not completed until June 4, 1985, at 1407 hours0.0163 days <br />0.391 hours <br />0.00233 weeks <br />5.353635e-4 months <br />.

In all three cases, the pump test results met acceptance criteria at the test time and all were declared operable by the Shift Supervisor.

The routing procedure, then in effect for completed tests was: 1) From Control Room to Drawing and Document Control (DDC), 2) DDC to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG) and, 3) SPCG to the reviewing engineer.

The following corrective actions are being implemented to prevent a recurrence of these events.

1. The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct DDC to forward all completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to SPCG.
2. The reviewing engineers will be placed on the distribution list for all surveillance test schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.
3. Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors (STAs) (Utility licensed and non-licensed) perform a review of the completed tests in the control room to fulfill the 96 hour0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> review requirement. The STAs are onshift

'>>IIC I ORM 5444 I9 83I

I NRC Form 344A U,S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM/SS/ON

/9.83)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVEO OMS NO 3/50 0/04 EXP/RES 8/31/88 FACILITY NAME II I OOCKET NUMSER ISI LER NUMSER'IS) PAGE ISI YEAR SE GVSNTIAL Pjcy, REVISION NVMIITR NVMPfR TEXT /// moro cpoco 8 ror/Ir/lor/ I/oo aaWirw'///C form 3//8A'c/ I IT/

0 5 0 0 0 5 2 8 5 035 01 03 OF 0

3. Continued 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed shortly after completion, The original corrective action taken for this event involved the use of a label to identify ASHE Section XI tests.

However, the STAs now perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility. of misplaced test packages.

No previous similar events have been reported.

VRC IORM 344k 19 83l

t 1

NRC Form 345 U.Sr NUCLEAR SIEGULATORY COMMISSION (9.53)

APPROVED OMB NO. 31504104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT {LER) EXPIRES: SI31ISS FACILITY N AME ( I ) DOCKET NUMBER (2) PA 3I TITLE (4I Palo V r 0 5 0 0 0 5 2 8 1 oF0 Failure to Perform ASME Section XI Re uired Test Review EVENT DATE(5) LER NUMBE'R (5) REPORT DATE l7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (SI MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR SSOVSNTI*L AX IISVrcrOrs MONTH OAY YEAR FACILITYNAMES DOCKET NUMBERIS) ssvMBEA f53 trvMBEII N/A 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 8 585 045 01 0 3 3 0 8 7 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT 1 0 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR (I: (Chose one or more N/A 0 5 0 0 0 OPERATINO ol the forlowingl (11 MODE (9) 20.402(S) 20.405(c) 50.13(e)LTI(lvl 73.71(SI POWE R 20.405( ~ ) II I II) 50.35 (c) (11 50.73(e) (2(HI 73.7 1(c)

LEVEL I10) 20.405(sI I I I(S) 50.35(cH2) 50.73(el(2) IvS I OTHER (Specify in renttrett Oelow enrf ln Test, HIIC Form 20,405( ~ HI I(rill X 50.73(e)(2HB 50.13(eH2) lvlllHAI 3ESAI 20.405(e Hl l(Iv) 50 73(eH2) (ill 50.73(e H2 Hv(SHB) 20.405(el(IHvl 50.73(402HI(l) 50.73 I ~ ) (2)(el LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS I.ER 112I NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE Thomas R. Bradish, Com liance Su ervisor Ext. 6936)

COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) 602 932 53 00 MANUFAC.

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT TVRER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANVFAC TUREA EPORTABLE <<'g+v@P~

TO NPRDS Qi~<k~x~<<:.A+p,st

..';.gg

@4~4$%j>'."II .Iv~,

I"gAC+~~j.-.:

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED I)4) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION YES llf yes, complsre EXPECTED SVSMISSIOrY DATE) DATE 05)

NO ASSTAACT (Limit to te00 speceL I ~ ., epprosimetely Irfteen singre specs typewritten hnesl (15)

On July 3, 1985, Palo Verde Unit 1 was in Mode 1 and at 38 percent reactor power.

Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) 4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components. This inspection and testing shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Procedure 41ST-1SI10 was performed on the train "B" High Pressure Safety Injection Pump (HPSI)(BQ) on June 22, 1985. The pump test results were not reviewed within the required time limit of 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br />.

The cause of this is the same as in LER 85-035-00. Procedural errors in the routing of test data caused the review delay. Steps had been taken to eliminate these procedural errors but were not fully implemented at the time of this event. These steps 'are now complete.

NRC form 354

f f

NRC Form 3EEA U.E. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMSEESON I8 83I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVEO OM8 NO 3lm~lOS EXPIRES: EI3l/88 FACILITY NAME ill OOCKET SSUMEER l2l LER SSUMEER IEI PACE I3s SEQVENTSAL rsLYresoN YEAR <<g NVM EN NVMPEN Palo Verde Unit 1 o s o o o 5 2 8 8 5 045 0 1 02oF 02 TEXT IIImore soece II eoerwed, srse ddreoonNI IIIIC Form OPIA'sI lit)

Palo Verde Unit 1 Technical Specification (Tech Spec) .4.0.5 specifies the Surveillance Requirements for inservice inspection and testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components. The results of the pump performance test that took place'n July 3, 1985 vere not revieved by the reviewing engineers (non-licensed utility and contract) within 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> required by IVP-3220 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI. This was discovered by the engineers doing the review.

This event occurred while the unit was in Mode 1 and at 38 percent reactor power with normal operating temperature and pressure.

HPSI "B" pump had been tested on June 22, 1985 at 1107. The required ASME review of the test results vere not completed until July 3, 1985 at 1212. This event is identical vith those incidents identified in LER 85-035-00. At that time the following corrective actions were specified to correct the problem.

1. The controlling procedure for the Surveillance Program (73AC-9ZZ04) has been changed to direct Drawing and Document Control (DDC) to forward all completed pump surveillance procedures directly to the reviewing engineers and then to the Surveillance Program Control Group (SPCG).
2. The revieving engineers have been placed on the distribution list for all su'rveillance test schedules to keep them apprised of pump testing in advance of procedure performance.

3, Additionally, the Shift Technical Advisors (STAs) (Utility licensed and non-licensed) perform a review of the completed tests in the control room to fulfill the 96 hour0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> review, requirement. The STAs are onshift 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day 7 days a week, so the tests can be reviewed shortly after completion.

The original corrective action taken for this event involved the use of a label to identify ASME Section XI tests. However, the STAs now perform the test review in order to minimize the time between completion of testing and the review of the test data and to reduce the possibility of misplaced test packages, At the time of this most recent event, the corrective action had not been fully implemented. This was determined to be the root cause of the event.

In addition to the corrective action stated, the reviewing engineers will monitor the required surveillance test schedules and will alert DDC on the timeliness of review/requirements.

The ASME review was completed on July 3, 1985. The results of the review revealed that the HPSI "B" pump passed satisfactorily. Therefore this event had no impact on the health and safety of the public.

A similar event was reported in LKR 528-85-035.

NsrC s SSNM 2SO+

IO 83 I

I l

Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o. BOX 52034 ~ PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85072-2034 192-00171-JGH/TRB/JHT March 30, 1987 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Unit 1 Docket No. STN 50-528 Licensee Event Reports 85-035-01 and 85-045-01 File: 87-020-404

Dear Sirs:

Attached please find Supplement Nos. Ol to Licensee Event Report (LER) Nos.

85-035-00 and 85-045-00 prepared and submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(d). We are herewith forwarding a copy of this report to the Regional Administrator of the Region V Office.

If you have any questions, please contact T. R, Bradish, Compliance Supervisor at (602) 932-5300, Ext. 6936.

Very truly yours, J. G. Haynes Vice President Nuclear Production JGH/TRB/cld Attachment cc: 0. M. DeMichele (all w/a)

E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

J. B. Martin R. P. Zimmerman R. C. Sorenson E, A. Licitra A, C. Gehr INPO Records Center

)I. f

-r I I

ff If II I

I I

(

I