ML19305C785: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:
{{#Wiki_filter:A
{{#Wiki_filter:A
   'l.    '
   'l.    '
      *
March 13, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                  )
        ..
March 13, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
                                                                                '
In the Matter of                  )
                                             )
                                             )
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY      )    Docket No. 50-289
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY      )    Docket No. 50-289
Line 32: Line 28:
[ SIC; SIXTH] SET OF AAMODT INTERROGATORIES
[ SIC; SIXTH] SET OF AAMODT INTERROGATORIES
^
^
DATED FEBRUARY 25, 1980
DATED FEBRUARY 25, 1980 On February 25, 1980 the Aamodt family intervenors filed a further set of interrogatories requiring responses from Licensee.
,
On February 25, 1980 the Aamodt family intervenors filed a further set of interrogatories requiring responses from Licensee.
(Although designated as the " third set", the February 25 filing is actually the sixth set of interrogatories received by Licensee " rom the Aamodt family.)    These interrogatories are identified as relat-ing to Aamodt Contention No. 4.      Licensee agrees with this assess-ment as to Interrogatory Nos. 1 through 3, and, therefore, does not object to these interrogatories.      However, Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 are unrelated to Aamodt Contention NO. 4, or to any other Aamodt contention accepted by the Licensing Board, and Licensee, therefore, objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10.
(Although designated as the " third set", the February 25 filing is actually the sixth set of interrogatories received by Licensee " rom the Aamodt family.)    These interrogatories are identified as relat-ing to Aamodt Contention No. 4.      Licensee agrees with this assess-ment as to Interrogatory Nos. 1 through 3, and, therefore, does not object to these interrogatories.      However, Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 are unrelated to Aamodt Contention NO. 4, or to any other Aamodt contention accepted by the Licensing Board, and Licensee, therefore, objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10.
The Aamodt family's emergency planning contentions were discussed by the Licensing Board in its Fourth Special Prehearing
The Aamodt family's emergency planning contentions were discussed by the Licensing Board in its Fourth Special Prehearing Conference Order (dated February 29, 1980).      Contention No. 3, relating generally to Licensee's environmental monitoring program, was rejected as impermissibly vague and nonspecific (id. at 4).
!
Conference Order (dated February 29, 1980).      Contention No. 3, relating generally to Licensee's environmental monitoring program, was rejected as impermissibly vague and nonspecific (id. at 4).
.
8004100437
8004100437
                                    .


                                                                    -
     /                                      Similarly, Aamodt Contention No. 6, relating generally to the adequacy of the 10-mile EPZ and radiation monitoring, was re-jected for failing to specify local conditions which would war-rant a departure from the 10-mile EPZ and because of vagueness (pl. at 6). What was accepted by the Licensing Board were Aamodt Contention No. 4, relating to the public dissemination of infor-mation on all radioactive releases, and Aamodt Contention No.      5, relating to the care and/or relocation of livestock during an emergency (id. at 5-6).
      *
     /                                      Similarly, Aamodt Contention No. 6, relating generally to the adequacy of the 10-mile EPZ and radiation monitoring, was re-
  '
jected for failing to specify local conditions which would war-rant a departure from the 10-mile EPZ and because of vagueness (pl. at 6). What was accepted by the Licensing Board were Aamodt Contention No. 4, relating to the public dissemination of infor-mation on all radioactive releases, and Aamodt Contention No.      5, relating to the care and/or relocation of livestock during an emergency (id. at 5-6).
With this background, Licensee objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 for the following reasons:
With this background, Licensee objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 for the following reasons:
(a)  Interrogatory No. 4 seeks information on the monitoring of a radioactive plume beyond the 10-mile EPZ.      This relates to rejected Contention Nos. 4 and 6.      Licensee therefore objects.
(a)  Interrogatory No. 4 seeks information on the monitoring of a radioactive plume beyond the 10-mile EPZ.      This relates to rejected Contention Nos. 4 and 6.      Licensee therefore objects.
(b)  Interrogatory No. 5 seeks information on protec-
(b)  Interrogatory No. 5 seeks information on protec-tive measures for the population beyond the 10-mile EPZ.      This relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6.      Licensee therefore objects.
'
(c)  Interrogatory No. 6 seeks information on the im-pact that evacuees might have on the ability of people beyond the 10-mile EPZ to take protective action. This too relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6. Licensee therefore objects.
tive measures for the population beyond the 10-mile EPZ.      This relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6.      Licensee therefore objects.
(c)  Interrogatory No. 6 seeks information on the im-pact that evacuees might have on the ability of people beyond
'
the 10-mile EPZ to take protective action. This too relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6. Licensee therefore objects.
(d)  Interrogatory Nos. 7 through 9 seek information on various issues related to evacuations. Aamodt Contention Nos.
(d)  Interrogatory Nos. 7 through 9 seek information on various issues related to evacuations. Aamodt Contention Nos.
4 and 5 do not relate to this matter. Licensee therefore objects.
4 and 5 do not relate to this matter. Licensee therefore objects.


                                                                    . . . . _ _ _ _
,. . . -                                                                                                                    r (e)  Interrogatory No. 10 seeks information on the additional manpower resources that may be needed during an emer-gency. This information is unrelated to Aamodt Contention Nos.
,. . . -                                                                                                                    r (e)  Interrogatory No. 10 seeks information on the additional manpower resources that may be needed during an emer-
                                                                                        ,
gency. This information is unrelated to Aamodt Contention Nos.
4 or 5, and Licensee therefore objects.
4 or 5, and Licensee therefore objects.
Raspectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By:    ,
Raspectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By:    ,
Robertg 1[. Zahler
Robertg 1[. Zahler Dated:  March 13, 1980 w
                                            '
k 1
Dated:  March 13, 1980
                                                                              -
w k
1
                                                -  ,      , _    ,        ,


l .
l .
                          ,
March 13, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                      )
March 13, 1980
                                                                    "
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                      )
                                             )
                                             )
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY            )    Docket No. 50-289
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY            )    Docket No. 50-289
Line 83: Line 54:
(Three Mile Island Nuclear            )
(Three Mile Island Nuclear            )
Station, Unit No. 1)                )
Station, Unit No. 1)                )
                                                                    ,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of :
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of :
(1) Licensee's Objections to the Second Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, i                    1980;
(1) Licensee's Objections to the Second Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, i                    1980; (2) Licensee's Objections to the Third Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, 1980; and (3) Licensee's Objections to the Third (Sic; Sixth] Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 25, 1980 --
'
were served upon those persons on the attached Service List by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 13th day of March, 1980.
.
(2) Licensee's Objections to the Third Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, 1980; and (3) Licensee's Objections to the Third (Sic; Sixth] Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 25, 1980 --
were served upon those persons on the attached Service List by
                                                                    ,
deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 13th day of March, 1980.
                                                                     ;
                                                                     ;
i                                                      7
i                                                      7 Gobert E. 5ahler  '
                              ,
                                ,
Gobert E. 5ahler  '
Dated: March 13, 1980
Dated: March 13, 1980


.
l . .
l . .
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                          )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of                          )
Line 109: Line 70:
SERVICE LIST Ivan W. Smith, Esquire                  John A. Ievin, Esquire Chairman                                Assistant Counsel Atmic Safety and Licensing              Pennsylvania Public Utility Ccmn'n Board Panel                          Post Office Box 3265 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission      Harrisburg, Penriylvania 17120 Washington, D.C. 20555 Karin W. Carter, Esqture Dr. Walter H. Jordan                    Assistant Attorney General Atanic Safety anci Licensing              505 Executive House Board Panel                          Post Office Box 2357 881 West Outer Drive                    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 John E. Minnich Dr. Linda W. Little                      Cha1Iman, Dauphin County Board Atanic Safety and Licensing                of Ccmnissioners Board Panel                          Dauphin County Courthouse 5000 Hermitage Drive                    Front and Market Streets Raleigh, North Carolina 27612            Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 James R. Tourtellotte, Esquire          Walter W. Cohen, Esquire Office of the Executive Icgal Director  Consumer Advocate U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission      Office of Consumer Advocate Washington, D.C. 20555                    14th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17127 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, D.C. 20555
SERVICE LIST Ivan W. Smith, Esquire                  John A. Ievin, Esquire Chairman                                Assistant Counsel Atmic Safety and Licensing              Pennsylvania Public Utility Ccmn'n Board Panel                          Post Office Box 3265 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission      Harrisburg, Penriylvania 17120 Washington, D.C. 20555 Karin W. Carter, Esqture Dr. Walter H. Jordan                    Assistant Attorney General Atanic Safety anci Licensing              505 Executive House Board Panel                          Post Office Box 2357 881 West Outer Drive                    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 John E. Minnich Dr. Linda W. Little                      Cha1Iman, Dauphin County Board Atanic Safety and Licensing                of Ccmnissioners Board Panel                          Dauphin County Courthouse 5000 Hermitage Drive                    Front and Market Streets Raleigh, North Carolina 27612            Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 James R. Tourtellotte, Esquire          Walter W. Cohen, Esquire Office of the Executive Icgal Director  Consumer Advocate U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission      Office of Consumer Advocate Washington, D.C. 20555                    14th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17127 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, D.C. 20555


__
   ; .                                      Jordan D. Cunningham, Esquire            Karin P. Sheldon, Esquire Attorney for Newberry Township          Attorney for People Against Nuclear T.M.I. Steering Comittee                Energy 2320 North Secord Street                Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110          1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006
   ; .                                      Jordan D. Cunningham, Esquire            Karin P. Sheldon, Esquire Attorney for Newberry Township          Attorney for People Against Nuclear T.M.I. Steering Comittee                Energy 2320 North Secord Street                Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110          1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006
     'Iheodore A. Adler, Esquire Widoff Peager Selkowitz & Adler          Bobert Q. Pollard Post Office Box 1547                    Chesapeako Energy Alliance Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105          609 Montpelier Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Ellyn R. Weiss,      tre Attorney for the Union of Concerned      Chauncey Kepford Scientists                            Judith H. Johnsrud l  Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss                  Environmental Coalition on Nuclear
     'Iheodore A. Adler, Esquire Widoff Peager Selkowitz & Adler          Bobert Q. Pollard Post Office Box 1547                    Chesapeako Energy Alliance Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105          609 Montpelier Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Ellyn R. Weiss,      tre Attorney for the Union of Concerned      Chauncey Kepford Scientists                            Judith H. Johnsrud l  Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss                  Environmental Coalition on Nuclear 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506          Power Washington, D.C. 20006                  433 Orlando Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801 Steven C. Sholly 304 South Market Street                Marvin I. Icwis obchanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055        6504 Bradford Terrace Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19149 Glil Bradford Holly S. Keck                            Marjorie M. Aanodt            -
'
Icgislation Chairman                    R. D. 5 Anti-Nuclear Group Pcpresenting York    Coatesville, Pennsylvania 19320 1    245 West Philadelphia Street York, Pennsylvania 17404 t
1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506          Power Washington, D.C. 20006                  433 Orlando Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801 Steven C. Sholly 304 South Market Street                Marvin I. Icwis obchanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055        6504 Bradford Terrace Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19149 Glil Bradford Holly S. Keck                            Marjorie M. Aanodt            -
Icgislation Chairman                    R. D. 5 Anti-Nuclear Group Pcpresenting York    Coatesville, Pennsylvania 19320 1    245 West Philadelphia Street York, Pennsylvania 17404
:
t
                               . ..}}
                               . ..}}

Revision as of 13:43, 1 February 2020

Objections to Intervenor Aamodt 800225 Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Interrogatories 4-10 Are Unrelated to Aamodt Contention 10 or Any Other Contention Accepted by Aslb. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19305C785
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/13/1980
From: Zahler R
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19305C783 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004100437
Download: ML19305C785 (6)
v • d • e


Text

A

'l. '

March 13, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289

) (Restart)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear )

Station, Unit No. 1) )

LICENSEE'S OBJECTIONS TO THE THIRD

[ SIC; SIXTH] SET OF AAMODT INTERROGATORIES

^

DATED FEBRUARY 25, 1980 On February 25, 1980 the Aamodt family intervenors filed a further set of interrogatories requiring responses from Licensee.

(Although designated as the " third set", the February 25 filing is actually the sixth set of interrogatories received by Licensee " rom the Aamodt family.) These interrogatories are identified as relat-ing to Aamodt Contention No. 4. Licensee agrees with this assess-ment as to Interrogatory Nos. 1 through 3, and, therefore, does not object to these interrogatories. However, Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 are unrelated to Aamodt Contention NO. 4, or to any other Aamodt contention accepted by the Licensing Board, and Licensee, therefore, objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10.

The Aamodt family's emergency planning contentions were discussed by the Licensing Board in its Fourth Special Prehearing Conference Order (dated February 29, 1980). Contention No. 3, relating generally to Licensee's environmental monitoring program, was rejected as impermissibly vague and nonspecific (id. at 4).

8004100437

/ Similarly, Aamodt Contention No. 6, relating generally to the adequacy of the 10-mile EPZ and radiation monitoring, was re-jected for failing to specify local conditions which would war-rant a departure from the 10-mile EPZ and because of vagueness (pl. at 6). What was accepted by the Licensing Board were Aamodt Contention No. 4, relating to the public dissemination of infor-mation on all radioactive releases, and Aamodt Contention No. 5, relating to the care and/or relocation of livestock during an emergency (id. at 5-6).

With this background, Licensee objects to Interrogatory Nos. 4 through 10 for the following reasons:

(a) Interrogatory No. 4 seeks information on the monitoring of a radioactive plume beyond the 10-mile EPZ. This relates to rejected Contention Nos. 4 and 6. Licensee therefore objects.

(b) Interrogatory No. 5 seeks information on protec-tive measures for the population beyond the 10-mile EPZ. This relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6. Licensee therefore objects.

(c) Interrogatory No. 6 seeks information on the im-pact that evacuees might have on the ability of people beyond the 10-mile EPZ to take protective action. This too relates solely to rejected Contention No. 6. Licensee therefore objects.

(d) Interrogatory Nos. 7 through 9 seek information on various issues related to evacuations. Aamodt Contention Nos.

4 and 5 do not relate to this matter. Licensee therefore objects.

,. . . - r (e) Interrogatory No. 10 seeks information on the additional manpower resources that may be needed during an emer-gency. This information is unrelated to Aamodt Contention Nos.

4 or 5, and Licensee therefore objects.

Raspectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By: ,

Robertg 1[. Zahler Dated: March 13, 1980 w

k 1

l .

March 13, 1980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289

) (Restart)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear )

Station, Unit No. 1) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of :

(1) Licensee's Objections to the Second Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, i 1980; (2) Licensee's Objections to the Third Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 22, 1980; and (3) Licensee's Objections to the Third (Sic; Sixth] Set of Aamodt Interrogatories Dated February 25, 1980 --

were served upon those persons on the attached Service List by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 13th day of March, 1980.

i 7 Gobert E. 5ahler '

Dated: March 13, 1980

l . .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-289

) (Restart)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear )

Station, Unit No. 1) )

SERVICE LIST Ivan W. Smith, Esquire John A. Ievin, Esquire Chairman Assistant Counsel Atmic Safety and Licensing Pennsylvania Public Utility Ccmn'n Board Panel Post Office Box 3265 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Harrisburg, Penriylvania 17120 Washington, D.C. 20555 Karin W. Carter, Esqture Dr. Walter H. Jordan Assistant Attorney General Atanic Safety anci Licensing 505 Executive House Board Panel Post Office Box 2357 881 West Outer Drive Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 John E. Minnich Dr. Linda W. Little Cha1Iman, Dauphin County Board Atanic Safety and Licensing of Ccmnissioners Board Panel Dauphin County Courthouse 5000 Hermitage Drive Front and Market Streets Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 James R. Tourtellotte, Esquire Walter W. Cohen, Esquire Office of the Executive Icgal Director Consumer Advocate U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Office of Consumer Advocate Washington, D.C. 20555 14th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17127 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, D.C. 20555

. Jordan D. Cunningham, Esquire Karin P. Sheldon, Esquire Attorney for Newberry Township Attorney for People Against Nuclear T.M.I. Steering Comittee Energy 2320 North Secord Street Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006

'Iheodore A. Adler, Esquire Widoff Peager Selkowitz & Adler Bobert Q. Pollard Post Office Box 1547 Chesapeako Energy Alliance Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 609 Montpelier Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Ellyn R. Weiss, tre Attorney for the Union of Concerned Chauncey Kepford Scientists Judith H. Johnsrud l Sheldon, Harmon & Weiss Environmental Coalition on Nuclear 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506 Power Washington, D.C. 20006 433 Orlando Avenue State College, Pennsylvania 16801 Steven C. Sholly 304 South Market Street Marvin I. Icwis obchanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055 6504 Bradford Terrace Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19149 Glil Bradford Holly S. Keck Marjorie M. Aanodt -

Icgislation Chairman R. D. 5 Anti-Nuclear Group Pcpresenting York Coatesville, Pennsylvania 19320 1 245 West Philadelphia Street York, Pennsylvania 17404 t

. ..

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19305C785&oldid=2374002"