ML060950220: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 1 AUDIT W ORKSHEET  GALL R EPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
{{#Wiki_filter:AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________
LRA AMP: __________________________                                                     REVIEWER: ______________________
R EVIEWER: ______________________
GALL AMP: X.S1, Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress                                   DATE: __________________________
GALL AMP: X.S1, Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress DATE: __________________________
Program               Auditable GALL Criteria                                           Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program               A. In order to ensure the adequacy of prestressing forces in       Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Description          prestressed concrete containment tendons during the extended       Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Program Description A. In order to ensure the adequacy of prestressing forces in prestressed concrete containment tendons during the extended period of operation, an applicant shall develop an aging management program (AMP) under 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii). The AMP consists of an assessment of the results of inspections performed in accordance with the requirements of Subsection IWL of the ASME Section XI Code, as supplemented by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix) or (viii) in the later amendment of the regulation. The assessment related to the adequacy of the prestressing force will consist of the establishment of (1) acceptance criteria and (2) trend lines. Consistent with GALL AMP:
period of operation, an applicant shall develop an aging management program (AMP) under 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii).
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
The AMP consists of an assessment of the results of inspections performed in accordance with the requirements of       Comment:
Comment: " B. The acceptance criteria will normally consist of predicted lower limit (PLL) and the minimum required prestressing force, also called minimum required value (MRV). NRC Regulatory Guide 1.35.1 provides guidance for calculating PLL and MRV. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Subsection IWL of the ASME Section XI Code, as supplemented by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix) or (viii) in the later amendment of the regulation. The assessment related to the adequacy of the prestressing force will consist of the establishment of (1) acceptance criteria and (2) trend lines.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
B. The acceptance criteria will normally consist of predicted     Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No lower limit (PLL) and the minimum required prestressing force,     Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
 
also called minimum required value (MRV). NRC Regulatory
Comment: " C. The trend line represents the trend of prestressing forces based on the actual measured forces. NRC Information Notice IN 99-10 provides guidance for constructing the trend line. The goal is to keep the trend line above the PLL because, as a result of any inspection performed in accordance with ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL, if the trend line crosses the PLL, the Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:


Guide 1.35.1 provides guidance for calculating PLL and MRV.
Comment:
Comment:
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 2 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  existing prestress in the containment tendon could go below the MRV soon after the inspection and would not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B).
C. The trend line represents the trend of prestressing forces      Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No based on the actual measured forces. NRC Information Notice        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
" D. As evaluated below, this time limited aging analysis (TLAA) is an acceptable option to manage containment tendon prestress force, except for the program element/attribute regarding operating experience. Thus, it is recommended that the staff should further evaluate an applicant's operating experience related to the containment tendon prestress force. The AMP related to the adequacy of prestressing force for containments with grouted tendons will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Consistent with GALL AMP:
IN 99-10 provides guidance for constructing the trend line. The
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  


Comment: 1. Scope of Program A. The program addresses the assessment of containment tendon prestressing force when an applicant chooses to perform the containment prestress force TLAA using 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii). Consistent with GALL AMP:
goal is to keep the trend line above the PLL because, as a result of any inspection performed in accordance with ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL, if the trend line crosses the PLL, the        Comment:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary                                1


Comment 2. Preventive Actions A. Maintaining the prestress above the MRV, as described under program description above, will ensure that the structural and functional adequacy of the containment are maintained. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Program              Auditable GALL Criteria                                            Documentation of Audit Finding Element existing prestress in the containment tendon could go below the MRV soon after the inspection and would not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B).
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
D. As evaluated below, this time limited aging analysis (TLAA) is  Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No an acceptable option to manage containment tendon prestress        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
force, except for the program element/attribute regarding operating experience. Thus, it is recommended that the staff


Comment: 3. Parameters Monitored/ Inspected A. The parameters to be monitored are the containment tendon prestressing forces in accordance with requirements specified in Subsection IWL of Section XI of the ASME Code, as incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a. Consistent with GALL AMP:
should further evaluate an applicant's operating experience related to the containment tendon prestress force. The AMP        Comment:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
related to the adequacy of prestressing force for containments with grouted tendons will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
: 1. Scope of          A. The program addresses the assessment of containment            Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Program              tendon prestressing force when an applicant chooses to perform    Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
the containment prestress force TLAA using 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii).
Comment
: 2. Preventive        A. Maintaining the prestress above the MRV, as described          Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Actions              under program description above, will ensure that the structural  Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
and functional adequacy of the containment are maintained.
Comment:
: 3. Parameters         A. The parameters to be monitored are the containment tendon       Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Monitored/            prestressing forces in accordance with requirements specified in   Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Inspected            Subsection IWL of Section XI of the ASME Code, as incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a.
Comment:
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary                                2


Program              Auditable GALL Criteria                                              Documentation of Audit Finding Element
: 4. Detection of      A. The loss of containment tendon prestressing forces is            Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Aging Effects        detected by the program.                                            Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Comment:
Comment:
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 3 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  4. Detection of Aging Effects A. The loss of containment tendon prestressing forces is detected by the program. Consistent with GALL AMP:
: 5. Monitoring        A. The estimated and measured prestressing forces are plotted        Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No and Trending          against time and the PLL, MRV, and trending lines developed          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
for the period of extended operation.
Comment: 5. Monitoring and Trending A. The estimated and measured prestressing forces are plotted against time and the PLL, MRV, and trending lines developed for the period of extended operation. Consistent with GALL AMP:
Comment:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
: 6. Acceptance        A. The prestressing force trend lines indicate that existing        Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No Criteria              prestressing forces in the containment tendon would not be          Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
below the MRVs prior to the next scheduled inspection, as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B).
Comment:
: 7. Corrective        A. If acceptance criteria are not met, then either systematic        Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Actions              retensioning of tendons or a reanalysis of the containment is        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
warranted to ensure the design adequacy of the containment.
As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions.                                      Comment:
: 8.                   A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the  Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Confirmation          requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to            Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Process              address the confirmation process.
Comment:
: 9.                    A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the  Consistent with GALL AMP:      Yes  No X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary                                  3


Comment: 6. Acceptance Criteria A. The prestressing force trend lines indicate that existing prestressing forces in the containment tendon would not be below the MRVs prior to the next scheduled inspection, as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B). Consistent with GALL AMP:
Program              Auditable GALL Criteria                                         Documentation of Audit Finding Element Administrative        requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to        Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:  
Controls              address the administrative controls.
 
Comment:
Comment: 7. Corrective Actions A. If acceptance criteria are not met, then either systematic retensioning of tendons or a reanalysis of the containment is warranted to ensure the design adequacy of the containment. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions. Consistent with GALL AMP:
: 10. Operating        A. The program incorporates the relevant operating experience    Consistent with GALL AMP:       Yes   No Experience            that has occurred at the applicant's plant as well as at other  Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
plants. The applicable portions of the experience with prestressing systems described in NRC Information Notice 99-10 could be useful for the purpose. However, tendon operating experience could be different at plants with prestressed        Comment:
concrete containments. The difference could be due to the prestressing system design (e.g., button-headed, wedge, or swaged anchorages), environment, and type of reactor (i.e.,
PWR and BWR). Thus, the applicant's X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary                              4


Comment: 8.
EXCEPTIONS Item          Program Elements                LRA Exception Description  Basis for Accepting Exception  Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                      (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Confirmation Process A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the confirmation process. Consistent with GALL AMP:
1.
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
2.


Comment: 9. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP:
ENHANCEMENTS Item          Program Elements                LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number                                                                                                      (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)
Yes  No X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 4 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding  Administrative Controls requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the administrative controls.
1.
Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:
2.
Comment: 10. Operating Experience A. The program incorporates the relevant operating experience that has occurred at the applicant's plant as well as at other plants. The applicable portions of the experience with prestressing systems described in NRC Information Notice 99-10 could be useful for the purpose. However, tendon operating experience could be different at plants with prestressed concrete containments. The difference could be due to the prestressing system design (e.g., button-headed, wedge, or swaged anchorages), environment, and type of reactor (i.e., PWR and BWR). Thus, the applicant's Consistent with GALL AMP:
Yes  No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:


Comment:
DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number                     Identifier (number)         Title                                                 Revision and/or Date 1.
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 5 EXCEPTIONS  Item Number Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
2.
ENHANCEMENTS Item Number Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed  (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2.    -
3.
DOCUMENT REVIEWED D URING A UDIT  Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1. 2. 3. 4.   -.}}
4.
.
X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary                              5}}

Revision as of 20:22, 23 November 2019

2006/03/22-GALL AMP: X.S1, Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
ML060950220
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/2006
From: Morgan M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
morgan M NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232
Shared Package
ML060950189 List: ... further results
References
%dam200611, TAC MC9668
Download: ML060950220 (5)


Text

AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________

LRA AMP: __________________________ REVIEWER: ______________________

GALL AMP: X.S1, Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress DATE: __________________________

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program A. In order to ensure the adequacy of prestressing forces in Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Description prestressed concrete containment tendons during the extended Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

period of operation, an applicant shall develop an aging management program (AMP) under 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii).

The AMP consists of an assessment of the results of inspections performed in accordance with the requirements of Comment:

Subsection IWL of the ASME Section XI Code, as supplemented by the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix) or (viii) in the later amendment of the regulation. The assessment related to the adequacy of the prestressing force will consist of the establishment of (1) acceptance criteria and (2) trend lines.

B. The acceptance criteria will normally consist of predicted Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No lower limit (PLL) and the minimum required prestressing force, Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

also called minimum required value (MRV). NRC Regulatory

Guide 1.35.1 provides guidance for calculating PLL and MRV.

Comment:

C. The trend line represents the trend of prestressing forces Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No based on the actual measured forces. NRC Information Notice Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

IN 99-10 provides guidance for constructing the trend line. The

goal is to keep the trend line above the PLL because, as a result of any inspection performed in accordance with ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL, if the trend line crosses the PLL, the Comment:

X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 1

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element existing prestress in the containment tendon could go below the MRV soon after the inspection and would not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B).

D. As evaluated below, this time limited aging analysis (TLAA) is Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No an acceptable option to manage containment tendon prestress Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

force, except for the program element/attribute regarding operating experience. Thus, it is recommended that the staff

should further evaluate an applicant's operating experience related to the containment tendon prestress force. The AMP Comment:

related to the adequacy of prestressing force for containments with grouted tendons will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

1. Scope of A. The program addresses the assessment of containment Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Program tendon prestressing force when an applicant chooses to perform Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

the containment prestress force TLAA using 10 CFR 54.21(c)(1)(iii).

Comment

2. Preventive A. Maintaining the prestress above the MRV, as described Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions under program description above, will ensure that the structural Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

and functional adequacy of the containment are maintained.

Comment:

3. Parameters A. The parameters to be monitored are the containment tendon Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Monitored/ prestressing forces in accordance with requirements specified in Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Inspected Subsection IWL of Section XI of the ASME Code, as incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a.

Comment:

X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 2

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element

4. Detection of A. The loss of containment tendon prestressing forces is Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Aging Effects detected by the program. Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

5. Monitoring A. The estimated and measured prestressing forces are plotted Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No and Trending against time and the PLL, MRV, and trending lines developed Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

for the period of extended operation.

Comment:

6. Acceptance A. The prestressing force trend lines indicate that existing Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Criteria prestressing forces in the containment tendon would not be Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

below the MRVs prior to the next scheduled inspection, as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(ix)(B) or 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(B).

Comment:

7. Corrective A. If acceptance criteria are not met, then either systematic Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions retensioning of tendons or a reanalysis of the containment is Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

warranted to ensure the design adequacy of the containment.

As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions. Comment:

8. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Confirmation requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Process address the confirmation process.

Comment:

9. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 3

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Administrative requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Controls address the administrative controls.

Comment:

10. Operating A. The program incorporates the relevant operating experience Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Experience that has occurred at the applicant's plant as well as at other Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

plants. The applicable portions of the experience with prestressing systems described in NRC Information Notice 99-10 could be useful for the purpose. However, tendon operating experience could be different at plants with prestressed Comment:

concrete containments. The difference could be due to the prestressing system design (e.g., button-headed, wedge, or swaged anchorages), environment, and type of reactor (i.e.,

PWR and BWR). Thus, the applicant's X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 4

EXCEPTIONS Item Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

ENHANCEMENTS Item Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1.

2.

3.

4.

.

X.M1 Metal Fatigue of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary 5