ML062650401: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:TeamTrack Reports NMC > Sites > Point Beach -Action Request > Corrective Actn Program (CAP) AR Section I | {{#Wiki_filter:TeamTrack Reports Page 4 of 62 NMC > Sites > Point Beach - Action Request > Corrective Actn Program (CAP) AR Section I Activity Request Id: CAP065035 Activity Type: CAP Submit Date: 6/1012005 7:40:40 AM | ||
@ One Line | |||
== Description:== | == Description:== | ||
Detailed | Improvement Opportunity for Behavior Observation Program | ||
*, Detailed | |||
== Description:== | == Description:== | ||
6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS: | |||
This was identified during NOS assessment 2005-002-3-029. | |||
10 CFR 26 requires that all individuals responsible for administering the testing program be subjected to the behavioral observation program. By virtue of employment, all personnel are subject to the observation program. However, some individuals are not employed by the Nuclear Management Company/ We Energies. For example, the physicians are not employees. In an Interview with the Site ANFFD Supervisor, he indicated that he and the Site Access Coordinator has almost daily communication with the physicians. A similar situation exists with other testing personnel (such as in Appleton and Milwaukee). Communications with these personnel is less frequent (several times per month). These constitute observations and therefore they are considered observed. An opportunity for improvement was identified to formally document this observation, much like is done with personnel who have unescorted access to the site but are not stationed at the site (such as Milwaukee employees) using form QF-1707 (Access Authorization/Behavioral Observation Review). | |||
10 CFR 26 requires that all individuals responsible for administering the testing program be subjected to the behavioral observation program. By virtue of employment, all personnel are subject to the observation program. However, some individuals are not employed by the Nuclear Management Company/ We Energies. | Requirement: 10 CFR 26 Appendix A, Section 2.3 (3) Preventing Subversion of Testing. | ||
For example, the physicians are not employees. | Licensees shall carefully select and monitor persons responsible for administering the testing program (e.g., collection site persons, laboratory technicians, specimen couriers, and those selecting and notifying personnel to be tested), based upon the highest standards for honesty and integrity, and shall implement measures to ensure that these standards are maintained. As a minimum, these measures shall ensure that the integrity of such persons is not compromised or subject to efforts to compromise due to personal relationships with any individuals subject to testing. | ||
In an Interview with the Site ANFFD Supervisor, he indicated that he and the Site Access Coordinator has almost daily communication with the physicians. | As a minimum: | ||
A similar situation exists with other testing personnel (such as in Appleton and Milwaukee). | (3) Persons responsible for administering the testing program shall be subjected to a behavioral observation program designed to assure that they continue to meet the highest standards for honesty and integrity. | ||
Communications with these personnel is less frequent (several times per month). These constitute observations and therefore they are considered observed. | Initiator: WALESH, RUSS 4 Initiator Department: NP QA PB Date/Time of Discovery: 6/10/2005 7:38:43 AM Date/Time of Occurrence: 6/10/2005 7:38:43 AM Identified By: External Other System: (None) | ||
An opportunity for improvement was identified to formally document this observation, much like is done with personnel who have unescorted access to the site but are not stationed at the site (such as Milwaukee employees) using form QF-1707 (Access Authorization/Behavioral Observation Review). | Equipment# (1st): (None) Equipment Name (1st): (None) | ||
Requirement: | Equipment # (2nd): (None) Equipment Name (2nd): (None) | ||
10 CFR 26 Appendix A, Section 2.3 (3) Preventing Subversion of Testing. | Equipment # (3rd): (None) Equipment Name (3rd): (None) | ||
Licensees shall carefully select and monitor persons responsible for administering the testing program (e.g., collection site persons, laboratory technicians, specimen couriers, and those selecting and notifying personnel to be tested), based upon the highest standards for honesty and integrity, and shall implement measures to ensure that these standards are maintained. | Site/Unit: Point Beach - None Why did this occur?: 6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS: | ||
As a minimum, these measures shall ensure that the integrity of such persons is not compromised or subject to efforts to compromise due to personal relationships with any individuals subject to testing. | Causes/Contributors: There is no Issue. This is an opportunity for improvement. | ||
As a minimum: (3) Persons responsible for administering the testing program shall be subjected to a behavioral observation program designed to assure that they continue to meet the highest standards for honesty and integrity. | Immediate Action Taken: 6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS: | ||
WALESH, RUSS 4 Initiator Department: | This was discussed with the Site AAIFFD Supervisor. | ||
NP QA PB Date/Time of Discovery: | Recommendations: 6110/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS: | ||
6/10/2005 7:38:43 AM Date/Time of Occurrence: | Evaluate this opportunity for improvement. | ||
Identified By: Equipment# | 0 SRO Review Required?: N Section 2 Operability Status: W 0 Compensatory Actions: N Basis for Operability: 6/10/2005 7:58:19 AM - MERKES, RICK: | ||
(1st): | No System, Subsystem, or Component important to nuclear safety or power generation is Unplanned TSAC Entry: N identified as being impaired within the reported observed condition. | ||
External Notification: N | |||
.1A1 S http://enws02/tmtrackltmtrack.dll?ReportPage&Template=reports%2Frptexec&ReportId=55 6/13/2005}} | |||
There is no Issue. This is an opportunity for improvement. | |||
Immediate Action Taken: 6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM -WALESH, RUSS: This was discussed with the Site AAIFFD Supervisor. | |||
Recommendations: | |||
6110/2005 7:40:40 AM -WALESH, RUSS: Evaluate this opportunity for improvement. | |||
0 SRO Review Required?: | |||
N Section 2 Operability Status: | |||
Latest revision as of 14:52, 23 November 2019
| ML062650401 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2005 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CAP065035, FOIA/PA-2006-0113 | |
| Download: ML062650401 (1) | |
Text
TeamTrack Reports Page 4 of 62 NMC > Sites > Point Beach - Action Request > Corrective Actn Program (CAP) AR Section I Activity Request Id: CAP065035 Activity Type: CAP Submit Date: 6/1012005 7:40:40 AM
@ One Line
Description:
Improvement Opportunity for Behavior Observation Program
- , Detailed
Description:
6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS:
This was identified during NOS assessment 2005-002-3-029.
10 CFR 26 requires that all individuals responsible for administering the testing program be subjected to the behavioral observation program. By virtue of employment, all personnel are subject to the observation program. However, some individuals are not employed by the Nuclear Management Company/ We Energies. For example, the physicians are not employees. In an Interview with the Site ANFFD Supervisor, he indicated that he and the Site Access Coordinator has almost daily communication with the physicians. A similar situation exists with other testing personnel (such as in Appleton and Milwaukee). Communications with these personnel is less frequent (several times per month). These constitute observations and therefore they are considered observed. An opportunity for improvement was identified to formally document this observation, much like is done with personnel who have unescorted access to the site but are not stationed at the site (such as Milwaukee employees) using form QF-1707 (Access Authorization/Behavioral Observation Review).
Requirement: 10 CFR 26 Appendix A, Section 2.3 (3) Preventing Subversion of Testing.
Licensees shall carefully select and monitor persons responsible for administering the testing program (e.g., collection site persons, laboratory technicians, specimen couriers, and those selecting and notifying personnel to be tested), based upon the highest standards for honesty and integrity, and shall implement measures to ensure that these standards are maintained. As a minimum, these measures shall ensure that the integrity of such persons is not compromised or subject to efforts to compromise due to personal relationships with any individuals subject to testing.
As a minimum:
(3) Persons responsible for administering the testing program shall be subjected to a behavioral observation program designed to assure that they continue to meet the highest standards for honesty and integrity.
Initiator: WALESH, RUSS 4 Initiator Department: NP QA PB Date/Time of Discovery: 6/10/2005 7:38:43 AM Date/Time of Occurrence: 6/10/2005 7:38:43 AM Identified By: External Other System: (None)
Equipment# (1st): (None) Equipment Name (1st): (None)
Equipment # (2nd): (None) Equipment Name (2nd): (None)
Equipment # (3rd): (None) Equipment Name (3rd): (None)
Site/Unit: Point Beach - None Why did this occur?: 6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS:
Causes/Contributors: There is no Issue. This is an opportunity for improvement.
Immediate Action Taken: 6/10/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS:
This was discussed with the Site AAIFFD Supervisor.
Recommendations: 6110/2005 7:40:40 AM - WALESH, RUSS:
Evaluate this opportunity for improvement.
0 SRO Review Required?: N Section 2 Operability Status: W 0 Compensatory Actions: N Basis for Operability: 6/10/2005 7:58:19 AM - MERKES, RICK:
No System, Subsystem, or Component important to nuclear safety or power generation is Unplanned TSAC Entry: N identified as being impaired within the reported observed condition.
External Notification: N
.1A1 S http://enws02/tmtrackltmtrack.dll?ReportPage&Template=reports%2Frptexec&ReportId=55 6/13/2005