ML12160A070: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12160A070
| number = ML12160A070
| issue date = 05/29/2012
| issue date = 05/29/2012
| title = Kewaunee Power Station - Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes
| title = Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes
| author name = Stafford J T
| author name = Stafford J
| author affiliation = Dominion, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc
| author affiliation = Dominion, Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. DominionN490 Hwy 42, Kewaunee, WI 54216 Web Address: www.dom.com MAY 2 9 2012 ATTN: Document Control Desk Serial No. 12-369 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC/MH/RO Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket No.: 50-305 License No.: DPR-43 DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.KEWAUNEE POWER STATION  
{{#Wiki_filter:Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.
N490 Hwy 42, Kewaunee, WI 54216 Dominion Web Address: www.dom.com MAY 2 9 2012 ATTN: Document Control Desk                                   Serial No. 12-369 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                           LIC/MH/RO Washington, DC 20555-0001                                     Docket No.: 50-305 License No.: DPR-43 DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.
KEWAUNEE POWER STATION


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Line 22: Line 24:


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF COMMITMENT CHANGES Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59(d)(2), enclosed is a summary description of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59(c) and implemented at the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) during the last reporting period, which is defined as not to exceed 24 months.A commitment change evaluation summary for those commitment changes that occurred during the last reporting period is also enclosed.The enclosed summary encompasses all changes that occurred in both of the stated areas since our prior submittal dated June 1, 2011 (reference 1).If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Ms. Mary Jo Haese at 920-388-8277.
 
Very truly yours, Jeffrey T. Stafford Director Safety and Licensing Kewaunee Power Station Commitments made by this letter: NONE  
OF COMMITMENT CHANGES Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59(d)(2), enclosed is a summary description of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59(c) and implemented at the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) during the last reporting period, which is defined as not to exceed 24 months.
A commitment change evaluation summary for those commitment changes that occurred during the last reporting period is also enclosed.
The enclosed summary encompasses all changes that occurred in both of the stated areas since our prior submittal dated June 1, 2011 (reference 1).
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Ms. Mary Jo Haese at 920-388-8277.
Very truly yours, Jeffrey T. Stafford Director Safety and Licensing Kewaunee Power Station Commitments made by this letter: NONE


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
: 1. Letter from Michael J. Wilson (Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.) to Document Control Desk (NRC), "Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes," dated June 1, 2011.
: 1. Letter from Michael J. Wilson (Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.) to Document Control Desk (NRC), "Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes," dated June 1, 2011.
Serial No. 12-369 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Mr. K. D. Feintuch Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08-H4A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Kewaunee Power Station Serial No. 12-369 ATTACHMENT 1  
 
Serial No. 12-369 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Mr. K. D. Feintuch Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08-H4A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Kewaunee Power Station
 
Serial No. 12-369 ATTACHMENT 1


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Line 34: Line 43:
==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF COMMITMENT CHANGES KEWAUNEE POWER STATION DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.
OF COMMITMENT CHANGES KEWAUNEE POWER STATION DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations 50.59 Evaluation  
 
#11-02-00 Activity Evaluated Design Change (DC) KW-1 0-01101, Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Ventilation Air Supply Modification Brief Description DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This was accomplished by removing the air supply to the EDG ventilation damper actuators from the EDG Air Start System and providing an air supply from the station Instrument Air System. Because the Instrument Air System is not safety related, an automatic safety related backup system was provided using compressed dry air bottles. The backup air supply provides a minimum seven days operation for the EDG ventilation dampers.Reason for Change This modification was performed as a result of Operability Determination (OD) 273 that addressed a Quality Assurance (QA) typing downgrade made to the EDG Air Start System in 1990. The QA typing downgrade included implementation of a manual operator action to valve into service the reserve air receivers in the event of a loss of compressed air supply for continued ventilation damper operation.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations 50.59 Evaluation #11-02-00 Activity Evaluated Design Change (DC) KW-1 0-01101, Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Ventilation Air Supply Modification Brief Description DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This was accomplished by removing the air supply to the EDG ventilation damper actuators from the EDG Air Start System and providing an air supply from the station Instrument Air System. Because the Instrument Air System is not safety related, an automatic safety related backup system was provided using compressed dry air bottles. The backup air supply provides a minimum seven days operation for the EDG ventilation dampers.
OD 273 states that the proper design and licensing basis information to support the change was unable to be located.The EDG Air Start System, one train each per EDG, provides a source of air to the EDG air start motors as well as the EDG Service Water control valve and previously, to the EDG room ventilation dampers. Each EDG Air Start train is comprised of four safety-related air receivers (two primary and two reserve), a safety related air compressor (with non-safety related components installed), an air dryer and cooler, and the tubing and valves to provide air pressure to the supported components.
Reason for Change This modification was performed as a result of Operability Determination (OD) 273 that addressed a Quality Assurance (QA) typing downgrade made to the EDG Air Start System in 1990. The QA typing downgrade included implementation of a manual operator action to valve into service the reserve air receivers in the event of a loss of compressed air supply for continued ventilation damper operation. OD 273 states that the proper design and licensing basis information to support the change was unable to be located.
The air compressors are powered from safety related motor control centers.The EDG ventilation dampers are safety related components and are vital for the operation of each EDG by providing combustion air to the diesel engines and regulating the temperature within each EDG room. Providing a safety-related air supply for damper operation from the EDG Air Start System could not be accomplished because the EDG Air Start air compressors could no longer be fully qualified as safety related.
The EDG Air Start System, one train each per EDG, provides a source of air to the EDG air start motors as well as the EDG Service Water control valve and previously, to the EDG room ventilation dampers. Each EDG Air Start train is comprised of four safety-related air receivers (two primary and two reserve), a safety related air compressor (with non-safety related components installed), an air dryer and cooler, and the tubing and valves to provide air pressure to the supported components. The air compressors are powered from safety related motor control centers.
The EDG ventilation dampers are safety related components and are vital for the operation of each EDG by providing combustion air to the diesel engines and regulating the temperature within each EDG room. Providing a safety-related air supply for damper operation from the EDG Air Start System could not be accomplished because the EDG Air Start air compressors could no longer be fully qualified as safety related.
 
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 6 DC KW-1 0-01101 was performed to provide a normal, unlimited air source to the EDG ventilation dampers from the non-safety related Instrument Air System. In addition, the modification provided an automatic seven day supply of safety related bottled air in the event of a loss of pressure in the Instrument Air System. This change also removed the manual action associated with use of the EDG air start system air receivers.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 6 DC KW-1 0-01101 was performed to provide a normal, unlimited air source to the EDG ventilation dampers from the non-safety related Instrument Air System. In addition, the modification provided an automatic seven day supply of safety related bottled air in the event of a loss of pressure in the Instrument Air System. This change also removed the manual action associated with use of the EDG air start system air receivers.
Summary DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This modification resolved OD 273, issued for a lack of proper documentation to support a QA typing downgrade of components in the EDG Air Start System and removed the manual action related to use of the reserve air receivers.
Summary DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This modification resolved OD 273, issued for a lack of proper documentation to support a QA typing downgrade of components in the EDG Air Start System and removed the manual action related to use of the reserve air receivers.
The 50.59 Evaluation performed for the modification addressed the new action to replace the compressed dry air bottle supply to provide EDG ventilation damper operation beyond seven days. The EDG ventilation dampers are designated as components in support of the EDG. If the EDG fails to operate, the EDG ventilation dampers will not operate. The seven day compressed air supply for the EDG ventilation dampers is consistent with the seven day supply of EDG fuel oil and EDG lube oil (ITS 3.8.3 and Bases). The new action to replenish the air bottle supply for the EDG ventilation dampers was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction.
The 50.59 Evaluation performed for the modification addressed the new action to replace the compressed dry air bottle supply to provide EDG ventilation damper operation beyond seven days. The EDG ventilation dampers are designated as components in support of the EDG. If the EDG fails to operate, the EDG ventilation dampers will not operate. The seven day compressed air supply for the EDG ventilation dampers is consistent with the seven day supply of EDG fuel oil and EDG lube oil (ITS 3.8.3 and Bases). The new action to replenish the air bottle supply for the EDG ventilation dampers was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction. Instructions for compressed air bottle replacement have been included in plant operating procedures and operator training has been provided on the procedures. The compressed air bottle system is designed to maintain air pressure to the ventilation dampers during the bottle replacement.
Instructions for compressed air bottle replacement have been included in plant operating procedures and operator training has been provided on the procedures.
Environmental conditions will not prohibit entry into the area to perform the air bottle replacement post-accident. Recovery from a credible human performance error can easily be remedied. Additional compressed air bottles are maintained onsite to support operation of one EDG for a minimum of 30 days to respond to any plant event. In addition, non-safety related local and remote Control Room alarms are provided as operator aids for advance warning of air supply depletion. Replacing the air bottles occurs approximately seven days after the start of the accident, during the recovery phase of the event, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.
The compressed air bottle system is designed to maintain air pressure to the ventilation dampers during the bottle replacement.
This change was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.
Environmental conditions will not prohibit entry into the area to perform the air bottle replacement post-accident.
 
Recovery from a credible human performance error can easily be remedied.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 6 50.59 Evaluation #11-06-00 Activity Evaluated DC KW-1 1-01121, Main Feedwater Pump Trip on Fast Bus Transfer Brief Description DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected main feedwater pump (MFP) during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the Reserve Auxiliary Transformer (RAT), provided the opposite MFP breaker is closed. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the Main Auxiliary Transformer (MAT).
Additional compressed air bottles are maintained onsite to support operation of one EDG for a minimum of 30 days to respond to any plant event. In addition, non-safety related local and remote Control Room alarms are provided as operator aids for advance warning of air supply depletion.
When both MFPs are running, the new trip feature will be used when the Reserve Supply Transformer (RST) Load Tap Changer (LTC) is operated in Manual; and is required when the LTC is operated in Automatic and the post-trip differential voltage (Delta-V) exceeds a minimum analyzed value. A new selector switch has been installed in the Control Room for the operator to select MFP A, MFP B, or no MFP, to trip during a fast bus transfer.
Replacing the air bottles occurs approximately seven days after the start of the accident, during the recovery phase of the event, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.This change was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.
Reason for Change When a fast bus transfer occurs as a result of energizing relays 86/T1 A and 86/T1 B (instantaneous generator lockout) or 86/T1 C and 86/T1 D (time delay turbine trip), a large amount of electrical load is rapidly applied to the RAT. The recent upgrades to the RAT/RST System increase the system voltage drop and make it more difficult for the RAT to support the added load during a fast bus transfer. A study was performed to review various solutions. The MFP trip during a fast bus transfer was selected as the means to shed unnecessary electrical load.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 6 50.59 Evaluation  
Summary DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected MFP during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the RAT. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the MAT.
#11-06-00 Activity Evaluated DC KW-1 1-01121, Main Feedwater Pump Trip on Fast Bus Transfer Brief Description DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected main feedwater pump (MFP)during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the Reserve Auxiliary Transformer (RAT), provided the opposite MFP breaker is closed. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the Main Auxiliary Transformer (MAT).When both MFPs are running, the new trip feature will be used when the Reserve Supply Transformer (RST) Load Tap Changer (LTC) is operated in Manual; and is required when the LTC is operated in Automatic and the post-trip differential voltage (Delta-V) exceeds a minimum analyzed value. A new selector switch has been installed in the Control Room for the operator to select MFP A, MFP B, or no MFP, to trip during a fast bus transfer.Reason for Change When a fast bus transfer occurs as a result of energizing relays 86/T1 A and 86/T1 B (instantaneous generator lockout) or 86/T1 C and 86/T1 D (time delay turbine trip), a large amount of electrical load is rapidly applied to the RAT. The recent upgrades to the RAT/RST System increase the system voltage drop and make it more difficult for the RAT to support the added load during a fast bus transfer.
The 10 CFR 50.59 Screen concluded that a relay, control switch or control cable malfunction could result in an inadvertent trip of MFPs A and/or B, resulting in loss of Normal Feedwater, or could result in a failure to trip MFP A or B on a fast bus transfer, which could result in a degraded voltage condition on the RAT and 4.16 kV Supply Bus 1-6.
A study was performed to review various solutions.
 
The MFP trip during a fast bus transfer was selected as the means to shed unnecessary electrical load.Summary DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected MFP during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the RAT. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the MAT.The 10 CFR 50.59 Screen concluded that a relay, control switch or control cable malfunction could result in an inadvertent trip of MFPs A and/or B, resulting in loss of Normal Feedwater, or could result in a failure to trip MFP A or B on a fast bus transfer, which could result in a degraded voltage condition on the RAT and 4.16 kV Supply Bus 1-6.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 6 A 50.59 Evaluation was performed that indicates the new relays and control switch are the same types used at Kewaunee for other safety related applications. The new relays, control switch and control cables meet applicable design, seismic, material and construction standards. Preventive maintenance for the new components will be implemented. Consequently, the new components will be at least as reliable as other Main Feedwater and Alternating Current power components. The 50.59 Evaluation concluded the activity will not result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a system/structure/component (SSC) important to safety previously evaluated in the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR). A degraded voltage condition on the RAT resulting from a fast bus transfer is not an accident evaluated in the USAR, but has been considered in the existing Kewaunee design and is bounded by the evaluated Loss of Offsite Power event. This change does not result in a more than minimal increase in the frequency of a Loss of Normal Feedwater event.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 6 A 50.59 Evaluation was performed that indicates the new relays and control switch are the same types used at Kewaunee for other safety related applications.
Additionally, a failure of the modified circuits will not result in an accident of a different type than previously analyzed in the USAR.
The new relays, control switch and control cables meet applicable design, seismic, material and construction standards.
This change does not introduce a new failure mode, it did not create a possibility for a malfunction of an SSC important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated, and the potential malfunctions are bounded by events previously analyzed in the USAR.
Preventive maintenance for the new components will be implemented.
50.59 Evaluation #12-02-00 Activity Evaluated Engineering Technical Evaluation (ETE), ETE-KW-2012-0020, Revision 0, Implement Calculation C10440, Revision 3, Battery Room Heat Up Following a Station Blackout Brief Description The licensing basis for Kewaunee Station Blackout (SBO) heat up calculations was based on NUMARC 87-00, Revision 0. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, correspondence between the licensee (WPSC) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at the time the SBO Rule was implemented clearly states that the NUMARC 87-00 method was used to determine Battery Room heat up. A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. Therefore, a 50.59 Evaluation was performed to assess the methodology change.
Consequently, the new components will be at least as reliable as other Main Feedwater and Alternating Current power components.
Reason for Change Calculation C1 0440, Battery Room Heat Up Following Station Blackout, Revision 3, was performed and includes recent changes to the Battery Room heat loads. This revision
The 50.59 Evaluation concluded the activity will not result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a system/structure/component (SSC) important to safety previously evaluated in the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR). A degraded voltage condition on the RAT resulting from a fast bus transfer is not an accident evaluated in the USAR, but has been considered in the existing Kewaunee design and is bounded by the evaluated Loss of Offsite Power event. This change does not result in a more than minimal increase in the frequency of a Loss of Normal Feedwater event.Additionally, a failure of the modified circuits will not result in an accident of a different type than previously analyzed in the USAR.This change does not introduce a new failure mode, it did not create a possibility for a malfunction of an SSC important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated, and the potential malfunctions are bounded by events previously analyzed in the USAR.50.59 Evaluation  
 
#12-02-00 Activity Evaluated Engineering Technical Evaluation (ETE), ETE-KW-2012-0020, Revision 0, Implement Calculation C10440, Revision 3, Battery Room Heat Up Following a Station Blackout Brief Description The licensing basis for Kewaunee Station Blackout (SBO) heat up calculations was based on NUMARC 87-00, Revision 0. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, correspondence between the licensee (WPSC) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at the time the SBO Rule was implemented clearly states that the NUMARC 87-00 method was used to determine Battery Room heat up. A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. Therefore, a 50.59 Evaluation was performed to assess the methodology change.Reason for Change Calculation C1 0440, Battery Room Heat Up Following Station Blackout, Revision 3, was performed and includes recent changes to the Battery Room heat loads. This revision Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 6 was performed using a new methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a, instead of the NUMARC 87-00 methodology used in calculation Revisions 0 through 2. With the recent heat loads added to the Battery rooms and the conservatisms in the NUMARC methodology, the potential existed for the calculated air temperature to exceed acceptable limits. Consequently, the calculation methodology was changed to a more realistic and accepted method, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a.Summary A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, the use of NUMARC 87-00 methodology was stated in earlier correspondence with the NRC.GOTHIC version 7.2a is used for similar evaluations, such as Kewaunee's post-accident room heat up determinations for the Control Room Exclusion Zone, the Emergency Diesel Generator Rooms, and the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone. GOTHIC is also approved at Kewaunee by the NRC for modeling Containment and the Auxiliary Building for High Energy Line Break analysis.
Serial No. 12-369 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 6 was performed using a new methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a, instead of the NUMARC 87-00 methodology used in calculation Revisions 0 through 2. With the recent heat loads added to the Battery rooms and the conservatisms in the NUMARC methodology, the potential existed for the calculated air temperature to exceed acceptable limits. Consequently, the calculation methodology was changed to a more realistic and accepted method, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a.
GOTHIC was used at Surry Power Station for evaluating Main Control Room heat up following a loss of heat removal. The Safety Evaluation Report (SER) issued for the associated Surry License Amendments states that the use of the GOTHIC computer code for the room heat up analysis without chilled water was acceptable to provide reasonable assurance that the room ambient temperature would not affect required equipment in the room. The use of GOTHIC for the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event is also consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.155, Station Blackout, issued June 1988, as revised August 1988, that states equipment will be considered acceptable for SBO temperature environments if an assessment has been performed that provides reasonable assurance the required equipment will remain operable.
Summary A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, the use of NUMARC 87-00 methodology was stated in earlier correspondence with the NRC.
Consequently, the Kewaunee Battery Room heat up calculation provides reasonable assurance that the Battery Room temperature will remain less than 120 OF so that required equipment will not be adversely affected.The 50.59 Evaluation for the methodology change for the Battery Room evaluation concluded that the use of GOTHIC, a methodology approved by NRC for similar applications and used within the limits of the applicable SER, is not considered a departure from a method of evaluation described in the USAR.Commitment Change Evaluation Summary There are no commitment change evaluations to report for this period.}}
GOTHIC version 7.2a is used for similar evaluations, such as Kewaunee's post-accident room heat up determinations for the Control Room Exclusion Zone, the Emergency Diesel Generator Rooms, and the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone. GOTHIC is also approved at Kewaunee by the NRC for modeling Containment and the Auxiliary Building for High Energy Line Break analysis. GOTHIC was used at Surry Power Station for evaluating Main Control Room heat up following a loss of heat removal. The Safety Evaluation Report (SER) issued for the associated Surry License Amendments states that the use of the GOTHIC computer code for the room heat up analysis without chilled water was acceptable to provide reasonable assurance that the room ambient temperature would not affect required equipment in the room. The use of GOTHIC for the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event is also consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.155, Station Blackout, issued June 1988, as revised August 1988, that states equipment will be considered acceptable for SBO temperature environments if an assessment has been performed that provides reasonable assurance the required equipment will remain operable. Consequently, the Kewaunee Battery Room heat up calculation provides reasonable assurance that the Battery Room temperature will remain less than 120 OF so that required equipment will not be adversely affected.
The 50.59 Evaluation for the methodology change for the Battery Room evaluation concluded that the use of GOTHIC, a methodology approved by NRC for similar applications and used within the limits of the applicable SER, is not considered a departure from a method of evaluation described in the USAR.
Commitment Change Evaluation Summary There are no commitment change evaluations to report for this period.}}

Latest revision as of 03:36, 12 November 2019

Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes
ML12160A070
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/29/2012
From: Stafford J
Dominion, Dominion Energy Kewaunee
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
12-369
Download: ML12160A070 (8)


Text

Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.

N490 Hwy 42, Kewaunee, WI 54216 Dominion Web Address: www.dom.com MAY 2 9 2012 ATTN: Document Control Desk Serial No.12-369 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC/MH/RO Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket No.: 50-305 License No.: DPR-43 DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION

SUMMARY

OF FACILITY CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS AND

SUMMARY

OF COMMITMENT CHANGES Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59(d)(2), enclosed is a summary description of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59(c) and implemented at the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) during the last reporting period, which is defined as not to exceed 24 months.

A commitment change evaluation summary for those commitment changes that occurred during the last reporting period is also enclosed.

The enclosed summary encompasses all changes that occurred in both of the stated areas since our prior submittal dated June 1, 2011 (reference 1).

If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Ms. Mary Jo Haese at 920-388-8277.

Very truly yours, Jeffrey T. Stafford Director Safety and Licensing Kewaunee Power Station Commitments made by this letter: NONE

Reference:

1. Letter from Michael J. Wilson (Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.) to Document Control Desk (NRC), "Summary of Facility Changes, Tests and Experiments and Summary of Commitment Changes," dated June 1, 2011.

Serial No.12-369 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Mr. K. D. Feintuch Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08-H4A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Kewaunee Power Station

Serial No.12-369 ATTACHMENT 1

SUMMARY

OF FACILITY CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS AND

SUMMARY

OF COMMITMENT CHANGES KEWAUNEE POWER STATION DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE, INC.

Serial No.12-369 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations 50.59 Evaluation #11-02-00 Activity Evaluated Design Change (DC) KW-1 0-01101, Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Ventilation Air Supply Modification Brief Description DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This was accomplished by removing the air supply to the EDG ventilation damper actuators from the EDG Air Start System and providing an air supply from the station Instrument Air System. Because the Instrument Air System is not safety related, an automatic safety related backup system was provided using compressed dry air bottles. The backup air supply provides a minimum seven days operation for the EDG ventilation dampers.

Reason for Change This modification was performed as a result of Operability Determination (OD) 273 that addressed a Quality Assurance (QA) typing downgrade made to the EDG Air Start System in 1990. The QA typing downgrade included implementation of a manual operator action to valve into service the reserve air receivers in the event of a loss of compressed air supply for continued ventilation damper operation. OD 273 states that the proper design and licensing basis information to support the change was unable to be located.

The EDG Air Start System, one train each per EDG, provides a source of air to the EDG air start motors as well as the EDG Service Water control valve and previously, to the EDG room ventilation dampers. Each EDG Air Start train is comprised of four safety-related air receivers (two primary and two reserve), a safety related air compressor (with non-safety related components installed), an air dryer and cooler, and the tubing and valves to provide air pressure to the supported components. The air compressors are powered from safety related motor control centers.

The EDG ventilation dampers are safety related components and are vital for the operation of each EDG by providing combustion air to the diesel engines and regulating the temperature within each EDG room. Providing a safety-related air supply for damper operation from the EDG Air Start System could not be accomplished because the EDG Air Start air compressors could no longer be fully qualified as safety related.

Serial No.12-369 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 6 DC KW-1 0-01101 was performed to provide a normal, unlimited air source to the EDG ventilation dampers from the non-safety related Instrument Air System. In addition, the modification provided an automatic seven day supply of safety related bottled air in the event of a loss of pressure in the Instrument Air System. This change also removed the manual action associated with use of the EDG air start system air receivers.

Summary DC KW-1 0-01101 provided the EDG ventilation damper actuators (air intake, exhaust, and recirculation dampers) with a safety related air supply separate from the EDG Air Start System. This modification resolved OD 273, issued for a lack of proper documentation to support a QA typing downgrade of components in the EDG Air Start System and removed the manual action related to use of the reserve air receivers.

The 50.59 Evaluation performed for the modification addressed the new action to replace the compressed dry air bottle supply to provide EDG ventilation damper operation beyond seven days. The EDG ventilation dampers are designated as components in support of the EDG. If the EDG fails to operate, the EDG ventilation dampers will not operate. The seven day compressed air supply for the EDG ventilation dampers is consistent with the seven day supply of EDG fuel oil and EDG lube oil (ITS 3.8.3 and Bases). The new action to replenish the air bottle supply for the EDG ventilation dampers was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction. Instructions for compressed air bottle replacement have been included in plant operating procedures and operator training has been provided on the procedures. The compressed air bottle system is designed to maintain air pressure to the ventilation dampers during the bottle replacement.

Environmental conditions will not prohibit entry into the area to perform the air bottle replacement post-accident. Recovery from a credible human performance error can easily be remedied. Additional compressed air bottles are maintained onsite to support operation of one EDG for a minimum of 30 days to respond to any plant event. In addition, non-safety related local and remote Control Room alarms are provided as operator aids for advance warning of air supply depletion. Replacing the air bottles occurs approximately seven days after the start of the accident, during the recovery phase of the event, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.

This change was determined not to result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction, and has no impact on the consequence of an accident.

Serial No.12-369 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 6 50.59 Evaluation #11-06-00 Activity Evaluated DC KW-1 1-01121, Main Feedwater Pump Trip on Fast Bus Transfer Brief Description DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected main feedwater pump (MFP) during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the Reserve Auxiliary Transformer (RAT), provided the opposite MFP breaker is closed. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the Main Auxiliary Transformer (MAT).

When both MFPs are running, the new trip feature will be used when the Reserve Supply Transformer (RST) Load Tap Changer (LTC) is operated in Manual; and is required when the LTC is operated in Automatic and the post-trip differential voltage (Delta-V) exceeds a minimum analyzed value. A new selector switch has been installed in the Control Room for the operator to select MFP A, MFP B, or no MFP, to trip during a fast bus transfer.

Reason for Change When a fast bus transfer occurs as a result of energizing relays 86/T1 A and 86/T1 B (instantaneous generator lockout) or 86/T1 C and 86/T1 D (time delay turbine trip), a large amount of electrical load is rapidly applied to the RAT. The recent upgrades to the RAT/RST System increase the system voltage drop and make it more difficult for the RAT to support the added load during a fast bus transfer. A study was performed to review various solutions. The MFP trip during a fast bus transfer was selected as the means to shed unnecessary electrical load.

Summary DC KW-1 1-01121 provided an automatic trip of a selected MFP during initiation of a fast bus transfer of non-safety related buses to the RAT. This change was implemented to ensure that adequate voltage will remain at the RAT during a transfer due to a loss of power from the MAT.

The 10 CFR 50.59 Screen concluded that a relay, control switch or control cable malfunction could result in an inadvertent trip of MFPs A and/or B, resulting in loss of Normal Feedwater, or could result in a failure to trip MFP A or B on a fast bus transfer, which could result in a degraded voltage condition on the RAT and 4.16 kV Supply Bus 1-6.

Serial No.12-369 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 6 A 50.59 Evaluation was performed that indicates the new relays and control switch are the same types used at Kewaunee for other safety related applications. The new relays, control switch and control cables meet applicable design, seismic, material and construction standards. Preventive maintenance for the new components will be implemented. Consequently, the new components will be at least as reliable as other Main Feedwater and Alternating Current power components. The 50.59 Evaluation concluded the activity will not result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a system/structure/component (SSC) important to safety previously evaluated in the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR). A degraded voltage condition on the RAT resulting from a fast bus transfer is not an accident evaluated in the USAR, but has been considered in the existing Kewaunee design and is bounded by the evaluated Loss of Offsite Power event. This change does not result in a more than minimal increase in the frequency of a Loss of Normal Feedwater event.

Additionally, a failure of the modified circuits will not result in an accident of a different type than previously analyzed in the USAR.

This change does not introduce a new failure mode, it did not create a possibility for a malfunction of an SSC important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated, and the potential malfunctions are bounded by events previously analyzed in the USAR.

50.59 Evaluation #12-02-00 Activity Evaluated Engineering Technical Evaluation (ETE), ETE-KW-2012-0020, Revision 0, Implement Calculation C10440, Revision 3, Battery Room Heat Up Following a Station Blackout Brief Description The licensing basis for Kewaunee Station Blackout (SBO) heat up calculations was based on NUMARC 87-00, Revision 0. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, correspondence between the licensee (WPSC) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at the time the SBO Rule was implemented clearly states that the NUMARC 87-00 method was used to determine Battery Room heat up. A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. Therefore, a 50.59 Evaluation was performed to assess the methodology change.

Reason for Change Calculation C1 0440, Battery Room Heat Up Following Station Blackout, Revision 3, was performed and includes recent changes to the Battery Room heat loads. This revision

Serial No.12-369 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 6 was performed using a new methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a, instead of the NUMARC 87-00 methodology used in calculation Revisions 0 through 2. With the recent heat loads added to the Battery rooms and the conservatisms in the NUMARC methodology, the potential existed for the calculated air temperature to exceed acceptable limits. Consequently, the calculation methodology was changed to a more realistic and accepted method, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a.

Summary A new evaluation of the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event was performed using a different methodology, GOTHIC, Version 7.2a. The Kewaunee USAR did not specifically call out the use of the NUMARC 87-00 as the methodology for determining the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event, however, the use of NUMARC 87-00 methodology was stated in earlier correspondence with the NRC.

GOTHIC version 7.2a is used for similar evaluations, such as Kewaunee's post-accident room heat up determinations for the Control Room Exclusion Zone, the Emergency Diesel Generator Rooms, and the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone. GOTHIC is also approved at Kewaunee by the NRC for modeling Containment and the Auxiliary Building for High Energy Line Break analysis. GOTHIC was used at Surry Power Station for evaluating Main Control Room heat up following a loss of heat removal. The Safety Evaluation Report (SER) issued for the associated Surry License Amendments states that the use of the GOTHIC computer code for the room heat up analysis without chilled water was acceptable to provide reasonable assurance that the room ambient temperature would not affect required equipment in the room. The use of GOTHIC for the Battery Room heat up following a SBO event is also consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.155, Station Blackout, issued June 1988, as revised August 1988, that states equipment will be considered acceptable for SBO temperature environments if an assessment has been performed that provides reasonable assurance the required equipment will remain operable. Consequently, the Kewaunee Battery Room heat up calculation provides reasonable assurance that the Battery Room temperature will remain less than 120 OF so that required equipment will not be adversely affected.

The 50.59 Evaluation for the methodology change for the Battery Room evaluation concluded that the use of GOTHIC, a methodology approved by NRC for similar applications and used within the limits of the applicable SER, is not considered a departure from a method of evaluation described in the USAR.

Commitment Change Evaluation Summary There are no commitment change evaluations to report for this period.