ML17040A220

Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2016004

ML17040A220
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/08/2017
From:	Fred Bower Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:	Browne K, Mccartney E NextEra Energy Seabrook
References
IR 2016004
Download: ML17040A220 (31)

See also: IR 05000443/2016004

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100

KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713

February 8, 2017

Mr. Eric McCartney

Site Vice President

Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

c/o Mr. Kenneth Browne

P.O. Box 300

Seabrook, NH 03874

SUBJECT: SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT

05000443/2016004

Dear Mr. McCartney:

On December 31, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an

inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook). On January 19, 2017, the NRC

inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff.

The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.

The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection

and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Fred L. Bower, III, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No. 50-443

License No. NPF-86

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000443/2016004

w/Attachment: Supplementary Information

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ

E. McCartney -2-

SUBJECT: SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT

05000443/2016004 dated February 8, 2017

DISTIRBUTION w/encl: (via e-mail)

DDorman, RA (R1ORAMAIL Res)

DLew, DRA (R1ORAMAIL Res)

MScott, DRP (R1DRPMAIL Res)

DPelton, DRP (R1DRPMAIL Res)

RLorson, DRS (R1DRSMAIL Res

JYerokun, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RES)

FBower, DRP

RBarkley, DRP

MDraxton, DRP

RVadella, DRP

PCataldo, DRP, SRI

PMeier, DRP, RI

ACass, DRP, Resident AA

JBowen, RI, OEDO

RidsNrrPMSeabrook Resource

RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource

ROPreports Resource

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRP\BRANCH3\Inspection Reports\Seabrook\2016\16Q4\SB IR16004 FINAL.docx

ADAMS Accession Number: ML17040A220

SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Publicly Available

Sensitive Non-Publicly Available

OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRP RI/DRP

NAME PCataldo/email RB RBarkley FBower

DATE 2/8/2017 2/8/2017 2/8/2017

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

1

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Docket No.: 50-443

License No.: NPF-86

Report No.: 05000443/2016004

Licensee: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

Facility: Seabrook Station, Unit No.1

Location: Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874

Dates: October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016

Inspectors: P. Cataldo, Senior Resident Inspector

P. Meier, Resident Inspector

R. Vadella, Project Engineer

B. Dionne, Health Physicist

W. Cook, Senior Reactor Analyst

J. DeBoer, EP Inspector

P. Ott, Operations Engineer

Approved by: Fred L. Bower, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 3

1. REACTOR SAFETY ........................................................................................................... 4

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection ..................................................................................... 4

1R04 Equipment Alignment ............................................................................................... 4

1R05 Fire Protection .......................................................................................................... 5

1R06 Flood Protection Measures ....................................................................................... 6

1R07 Heat Sink Performance ............................................................................................ 6

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance ... 7

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 8

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control .................................. 9

1R15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments ...................................... 9

1R18 Plant Modifications ..................................................................................................10

1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing .......................................................................................10

1R22 Surveillance Testing ................................................................................................11

1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes .........................................11

2. RADIATION SAFETY.........................................................................................................12

2RS1 Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls .......................................12

2RS5 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation ......................................................................13

4. OTHER ACTIVITIES ..........................................................................................................13

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification ...........................................................................13

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution .....................................................................14

4OA5 Other Activities ........................................................................................................18

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit...........................................................................................20

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION....................................................................................... A-1

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT .................................................................................................. A-1

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED .................................... A-1

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED....................................................................................... A-1

LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................. A-9

3

SUMMARY

IR 05000443/2016004; 10/01/2016-12/31/2016; Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1; Routine

Integrated Inspection Report.

This report covered a three-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and announced

baseline inspections performed by regional inspectors. The NRCs program for overseeing the

safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor

Oversight Process, Revision 6.

4

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Plant Status

Seabrook operated at full power for the entire assessment period, with the exception of a minor

down-power on December 9, 2016, to perform scheduled main turbine control valve testing.

Documents reviewed for each section of this inspection report are listed in the Attachment.

1. REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection (71111.01 - 1 sample)

Readiness for Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed NextEras readiness for the onset of seasonal cold

temperatures. The review focused on the emergency feedwater pump building, the

service water (SW) pumphouse and the cooling tower (CT) pump area. The inspectors

reviewed the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), technical specifications

(TSs), control room logs, and the corrective action program (CAP) to determine what

temperatures or other seasonal weather could challenge these systems, and to ensure

NextEra personnel had adequately prepared for these challenges. The inspectors

reviewed station procedures, including NextEras seasonal weather preparation

procedure and applicable operating procedures. The inspectors performed walkdowns

of the selected systems to ensure station personnel identified issues that could

challenge the operability of the systems during cold weather conditions.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R04 Equipment Alignment

.1 Partial System Walkdowns (71111.04 - 4 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed partial walkdowns of the following systems:

• CT SW train B during A train maintenance on October 11

• 480V AC Bus 52 transformer PM on October 18

• 480V AC Bus 52 secondary breaker maintenance on October 18

• Startup feed pump following maintenance run on October 20

The inspectors selected these systems based on their risk-significance relative to the

reactor safety cornerstones at the time they were inspected. The inspectors reviewed

applicable operating procedures, system diagrams, the UFSAR, TSs, work orders

(WOs), condition reports (CRs), and the impact of ongoing work activities on redundant

trains of equipment to identify conditions that could have impacted the systems

performance of its intended safety functions. The inspectors also performed field

5

walkdowns of accessible portions of the systems to verify system components and

support equipment were aligned correctly and were operable. The inspectors examined

the material condition of the components and observed operating parameters of

equipment to verify that there were no deficiencies. The inspectors also reviewed

whether NextEra staff had properly identified equipment issues and entered them into

the CAP for resolution with the appropriate significance characterization.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Full System Walkdown (71111.04S - 1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

On November 17, 2016, the inspectors performed a complete system walkdown of

accessible portions of the A train voltage direct current (VDC) system alignment

following battery replacement, to verify the existing equipment lineup was correct. The

inspectors reviewed operating procedures, surveillance tests, system diagrams,

equipment line-up check-off lists, WOs, work requests, CRs, TSs, and the UFSAR to

verify the system was aligned to perform its required safety functions. The inspectors

also reviewed electrical power availability, component lubrication and equipment cooling,

hanger and support functionality, and operability of support systems. The inspectors

performed field walkdowns of accessible portions of the systems to verify system

components and support equipment were aligned correctly and operable. The

inspectors examined the material condition of the components and observed operating

parameters of equipment to verify that there were no deficiencies. The inspectors also

reviewed whether NextEra staff had appropriately evaluated and resolved any

equipment issues and other performance deficiencies and entered them into their CAP

for resolution with the appropriate significance characterization.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R05 Fire Protection

Resident Inspector Quarterly Walkdowns (71111.05Q - 5 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted tours of the areas listed below to assess the material

condition and operational status of fire protection features. The inspectors verified that

NextEra controlled combustible materials and ignition sources in accordance with

administrative procedures. The inspectors verified that fire protection and suppression

equipment was available for use as specified in the area pre-fire plan, and passive fire

barriers were maintained in good material condition. The inspectors also verified that

station personnel implemented compensatory measures for out of service, degraded, or

inoperable fire protection equipment, as applicable, in accordance with procedures.

• Cable spreading room (CB-F-2A-A) on October 18

• Containment enclosure ventilation area (CE-F-1-A) on October 19

• Turbine building 50 (TB-F-2-0, TB-F-2-Z) on December 29

6

• Turbine building 75 (TB-F-3-0) on December 29

• Service & circulating water pump house (SW-F-1A-Z) on December 29

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R06 Flood Protection Measures (71111.06 - 1 sample)

Internal Flooding Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the UFSAR, the site flooding analysis, and plant procedures to

identify internal flooding susceptibilities for the site. The inspectors review focused on

the cooling water tower pump room to verify the adequacy of drains, electrical

connections and boxes, and control circuits. It verified the adequacy of equipment seals

located below the flood line, floor and water penetration seals, watertight door seals,

common drain lines and sumps, sump pumps, level alarms, control circuits, and

temporary or removable flood barriers. It assessed the adequacy of operator actions

that NextEra had identified as necessary to cope with flooding in this area and also

reviewed the CAP to determine if NextEra was identifying and correcting problems

associated with both flood mitigation features and site procedures for responding to

flooding.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R07 Heat Sink Performance (711111.07A - 1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the B emergency diesel generator (EDG) heat exchanger leak

repair to ensure readiness and availability from November 16 through 18. They

observed maintenance activities, which included tube leak investigation and

plugging. The inspectors discussed the results of the most recent inspection with

applicable NextEra staff and observed the as-found and as-left conditions. The

inspectors verified that NextEra initiated appropriate corrective actions for identified

deficiencies. The inspectors also verified that the number of tubes plugged within the

heat exchanger did not exceed the maximum amount allowed.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

7

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance

(71111.11Q - 2 samples, 71111.11A - 1 sample)

.1 Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification Testing and Training

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed licensed operator simulator training on October 19, 2016,

which included an anticipated transient without scram scenario. The inspectors

evaluated operator performance during the simulated event and verified completion of

risk significant operator actions, including the use of abnormal and emergency operating

procedures. The inspectors assessed the clarity and effectiveness of communications,

implementation of actions in response to alarms and degrading plant conditions, and the

oversight and direction provided by the control room supervisor. The inspectors verified

the accuracy and timeliness of the emergency classification made by the shift manager

and the technical specification action statements entered by the shift manager.

Additionally, the inspectors assessed the ability of the crew and training staff to identify

and document crew performance problems.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance in the Main Control Room

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed infrequently performed test or evolution briefings, pre-shift

briefings, and reactivity control briefings to verify that the briefings met the criteria

specified in NextEras Administrative Procedure OP-AA-100-1000, Conduct of

Operations, Revisions 18 and 19. In addition, on October 6, 2016, the inspectors

observed: control room operators utilize alarm response procedures (ARP) following an

unexpected ground on unit substation (US)-52; reactivity (dilution) activity and setup for

reactor coolant system hotleg calibration, which included: (1) the placement of

condenser steam dump valve control system into steam pressure mode, (2) initiation of

forced pressurizer sprays, (3) placement of the rod control system into manual control,

and (4) placement of the pressurizer level control system into manual control. The

inspectors also observed a deviation log entry for configuration control of power

operated relief valve (PORV) RC-456B Block Valve, RC-V-124, which was left open

during instrumentation and controls (I&C) performance of surveillance testing.

Additionally, on December 19, 2016, the inspectors observed a pre-job brief and

performance of a pressurizer pressure operational test and a quarterly PORV block

valve timing test, conducted with both Operations and I&C technicians; several

annunciator alarm response activities resulting from field activities; recovery from venting

the pressurizer relief tank (PRT); and verified senior reactor operator (SRO) TS entries

for testing and technical requirements manual (TRM) review for emergent work.

On December 21, 2016, inspectors observed a pre-job brief and high risk discussion,

including the reactivity effects of steam usage during performance of the turbine-driven

emergency feedwater (EFW) pump surveillance testing and associated valve timing

testing, as well as coordination with the emergency news manager for the steam release

and chemistry pre-requisites for the testing; and unexpected annunciator response

involving SW travelling screen high d/p. The inspectors, as applicable, observed

8

operator performance to verify that procedure use, crew communications, and

coordination of activities between work groups similarly met established expectations

and standards.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Annual Operator Testing

a. Inspection Scope

On December 15, 2016, one NRC region-based inspector conducted an in-office review

of results of the licensee-administered annual operating tests for 2016 for Seabrook

Station Unit No.1 operators. The inspection assessed whether Pass/Fail rates were

consistent with the guidance of NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix I,

Operator Requalification Human Performance Significance Determination Process.

The review verified that the failure rate (individual or crew) did not exceed 20 percent.

• None of the 47 operators failed any section of the Annual Exam. The overall

individual failure rate was 0.0 percent.

• None of the 10 crews failed the simulator test. The crew failure rate was 0.0

percent.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness (71111.12Q - 4 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the samples listed below to assess the effectiveness of

maintenance activities on structure, system, and component (SSC) performance and

reliability. The inspectors reviewed system health reports, CAP documents,

maintenance WOs, and maintenance rule (MR) basis documents to ensure that NextEra

was identifying and properly evaluating performance problems within the scope of the

MR. For each sample selected, the inspectors verified that the SSC was properly

scoped into the MR in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations

(10 CFR) 50.65 and verified that the (a)(2) performance criteria established by NextEra

staff were reasonable. As applicable, for SSCs classified as (a)(1), the inspectors

assessed the adequacy of goals and corrective actions to return these SSCs to (a)(2).

Additionally, the inspectors ensured that NextEra staff was identifying and addressing

common cause failures that occurred within and across MR system boundaries.

• SW system leak downstream of 1-SW-V5 on October 4

• A VDC battery cell replacement activities during October - November 2016

• Instrument air system repair history and improvement activities in November 2016

• Breaker maintenance and several associated component failures PC during

November - December 2016

9

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (71111.13 - 3 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed station evaluation and management of plant risk for the

maintenance and emergent work activities listed below to verify that NextEra performed

the appropriate risk assessments prior to removing equipment for work. The inspectors

selected these activities based on potential risk significance relative to the reactor safety

cornerstones. As applicable for each activity, the inspectors verified that NextEra

personnel performed risk assessments as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and that the

assessments were accurate and complete. When NextEra performed emergent work,

the inspectors verified that operations personnel promptly assessed and managed plant

risk. The inspectors reviewed the scope of maintenance work and discussed the results

of the assessment with the stations probabilistic risk analyst to verify plant conditions

were consistent with the risk assessment. The inspectors also reviewed the technical

specification requirements and inspected portions of redundant safety systems, when

applicable, to verify risk analysis assumptions were valid and applicable requirements

were met.

• CT SW pump A relay testing on October 14

• A vital DC battery inoperable and solar magnetic disturbance off

normal condition procedure entry on October 25

• A primary component cooling water (PCCW) pump motor change out on

November 15 & 16

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (71111.15 - 1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed operability determinations for the following degraded or

non-conforming conditions based on the risk significance of the associated components

and systems:

• CT SW pump A discharge piping leak on October 14

The inspectors evaluated the technical adequacy of the operability determinations to

assess whether technical specification operability was properly justified and the subject

component or system remained available such that no unrecognized increase in risk

occurred. The inspectors compared the operability and design criteria in the appropriate

sections of the TSs and UFSAR to NextEras evaluations to determine whether the

components or systems were operable. The inspectors confirmed, where appropriate,

compliance with bounding limitations associated with the evaluations. Where

compensatory measures were required to maintain operability, the inspectors

determined whether the measures in place would function as intended and were

properly controlled by NextEra.

10

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R18 Plant Modifications (71111.18 - 2 samples)

.1 Temporary Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the temporary modifications listed below to determine whether

the modifications affected the safety functions of systems that are important to safety.

The inspectors reviewed 10 CFR 50.59 documentation and post-modification testing

results, and conducted field walkdowns of the modifications to verify that the temporary

modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance

capability of the affected systems.

• A VDC battery cell replacement during October - November 2016

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Permanent Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated a modification to the SW pumphouse ventilation system,

implemented by engineering change (EC) 287688, Service Water Pumphouse

Thermostat Setpoint Change, Revision 0. The inspectors verified that the design bases,

licensing bases, and performance capability of the affected systems were not degraded

by the modification. In addition, the inspectors reviewed modification documents

associated with the design change, including WO 40497981, which implemented the

applicable thermostat setpoint changes. The inspectors verified that affected interface

documents, such as the calibration procedures utilized to adjust the setpoints, had been

revised to the settings consistent with the modification requirements.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing (71111.19 - 5 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the post-maintenance tests for the maintenance activities listed

below to verify that procedures and test activities adequately tested the safety functions

that may have been affected by the maintenance activity, that the acceptance criteria in

the procedure were consistent with the information in the applicable licensing basis

and/or design basis documents, and that the test results were properly reviewed and

accepted and problems were appropriately documented. The inspectors also walked

down the affected job site, observed the pre-job brief and post-job critique where

possible, confirmed work site cleanliness was maintained, and witnessed the test or

11

reviewed test data to verify quality control hold point were performed and checked, and

that results adequately demonstrated restoration of the affected safety functions.

• CT SW pump A relay testing on October 17

• 480V AC Bus 52 transformer PM/secondary breaker maintenance on October 18

• A residual heat removal (RHR) pump seal cooler flow instrument leak repair on

November 4

• A PCCW pump motor change out on November 15 and 16

• B EDG heat exchanger leak repair on November 16 through 18

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R22 Surveillance Testing (71111.22 - 3 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed performance of surveillance tests and/or reviewed test data of

selected risk-significant SSCs to assess whether test results satisfied TSs, the UFSAR,

and NextEra procedure requirements. The inspectors verified that test acceptance

criteria were clear, tests demonstrated operational readiness and were consistent with

design documentation, test instrumentation had current calibrations and the range and

accuracy for the application, tests were performed as written, and applicable test

prerequisites were satisfied. Upon test completion, the inspectors considered whether

the test results supported that equipment was capable of performing the required safety

functions. The inspectors reviewed the following surveillance tests:

• TS surveillance frequency change project and evaluation for the analog channel

operational test frequency extension

• B train RHR quarterly flow and valve stroke testing on November 29 (in-service test)

• 2B charging pump flow testing on December 5

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes (71114.04 - 1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

NextEra implemented various changes to the Seabrook Emergency Action Levels

(EALs), Emergency Plan, and Implementing Procedures. NextEra had determined that,

in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(3), any change made to the EALs, Emergency

Plan, and its lower-tier implementing procedures, had not resulted in any reduction in

effectiveness of the Plan, and that the revised Plan continued to meet the standards in

50.47(b) and the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E.

The inspectors performed an in-office review of all EAL and Emergency Plan changes

submitted by NextEra as required by 10 CFR 50.54(q)(5), including the changes to

lower-tier emergency plan implementing procedures, to evaluate for any potential

12

reductions in effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. This review by the inspectors was

not documented in an NRC Safety Evaluation Report and does not constitute formal

NRC approval of the changes. Therefore, these changes remain subject to future NRC

inspection in their entirety. The requirements in 10 CFR 50.54(q) were used as

reference criteria.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

2. RADIATION SAFETY

Cornerstone: Public Radiation Safety

2RS1 Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls (71124.01 - 3 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed Next Eras performance in assessing and controlling

radiological hazards in the workplace. The inspectors used the requirements contained

in 10 CFR Part 20, TSs, applicable Regulatory Guides (RGs), and the procedures

required by TSs as criteria for determining compliance.

Inspection Planning

The inspectors reviewed the performance indicators (PIs) for the occupational exposure

cornerstone, radiation protection (RP) program audits, and reports of operational

occurrences in occupational radiation safety since the last inspection.

Radiological Hazard Assessment (1 sample)

The inspectors conducted independent radiation measurements during walkdowns of the

facility and reviewed, air sampling and analysis, continuous air monitor use, and any

changes to plant operations since the last inspection to verify sampling/monitoring

adequacy of any new radiological hazards for onsite workers or members of the public.

Contamination and Radioactive Material Control (1 sample)

The inspectors observed the monitoring of potentially contaminated material leaving the

radiological controlled area and inspected the methods and radiation monitoring

instrumentation used for control, survey, and release of that material.

Radiological Hazards Control and Work Coverage (1 sample)

The inspectors assessed the use of continuous air monitoring, air sampling and

engineering controls; and dosimetry monitoring were consistent with the present

conditions.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

13

2RS5 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation (71124.05)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed performance in assuring the accuracy and operability of

radiation monitoring instruments used to protect occupational workers during plant

operations and from postulated accidents. The inspectors used the requirements in

10 CFR Part 20, RGs, American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 323A, N323D, and

N42.14, and procedures required by TSs as criteria for determining compliance.

Inspection Planning

The inspectors reviewed Next Eras UFSAR, RP audits, records of in-service survey

instrumentation, and procedures for instrument source checks and calibrations.

Calibration and Testing Program

The inspectors reviewed radioactive effluent discharge system surveillance test results

based on TS acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that high-range effluent

monitors used in emergency operating procedures are calibrated and operable and have

post-accident effluent sampling capability.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4. OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151)

.1 Mitigating Systems Performance Index (3 samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed NextEras submittal of the Mitigating Systems Performance

Index for the following systems for the period of October 1, 2015, through September 30,

2016:

• Safety System Functional Failures (MS05)

• RHR System (MS09)

• Cooling Water System (MS10)

To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, the inspectors

used definitions and guidance contained in NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory

Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7. The inspectors also

reviewed NextEras operator narrative logs, mitigating systems performance index

derivation reports and basis documents, event reports, and NRC integrated inspection

reports to validate the accuracy of the submittals.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

14

.2 Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness (1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed licensee submittals for the occupational radiological

occurrences PI for the fourth quarter 2015 through the third quarter 2016. The

inspectors used PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02,

Revision 7, Regulatory Assessment of Performance Indicator Guidance, to determine

the accuracy of the PI data reported. The inspectors reviewed electronic personal

dosimetry accumulated dose alarms, dose reports, and dose assignments for any

intakes that occurred during the time period reviewed to determine if there were

potentially unrecognized PI occurrences. The inspectors conducted walkdowns of

various Locked High and Very High Radiation Area entrances to determine the

adequacy of the controls in place for these areas.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Radiological Effluent Technical Specification/Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

Radiological Effluent Occurrences (1 sample)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed licensee submittals for the radiological effluent TS/Offsite Dose

Calculation Manual (ODCM) radiological effluent occurrences PI for the fourth quarter

2015 through third quarter 2016. The inspectors used PI definitions and guidance

contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Revision 7, Regulatory Assessment of

Performance Indicator Guidance, to determine if the PI data was reported properly. The

inspectors reviewed the public dose assessments for the PI for public radiation safety to

determine if related data was accurately calculated and reported.

The inspectors reviewed the CAP database to identify any potential occurrences such as

unmonitored, uncontrolled, or improperly calculated effluent releases that may have

impacted offsite dose. The inspectors reviewed gaseous and liquid effluent summary

data and the results of associated offsite dose calculations to determine if indicator

results were accurately reported.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution (71152 - 3 samples)

.1 Routine Review of Problem Identification and Resolution Activities

a. Inspection Scope

As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, the

inspectors routinely reviewed issues during baseline inspection activities and plant

status reviews to verify NextEra entered issues into the CAP at an appropriate threshold,

gave adequate attention to timely corrective actions, and identified and addressed

adverse trends. In order to assist with the identification of repetitive equipment failures

15

and specific human performance issues for follow-up, the inspectors performed a daily

screening of items entered into the CAP and periodically attended CR screening

meetings. The inspectors also confirmed, on a sampling basis, that, as applicable, for

identified defects and non-conformances, NextEra performed an evaluation in

accordance with 10 CFR Part 21.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Semi-Annual Trend Review

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a semi-annual review of site issues to identify trends that

might indicate the existence of more significant safety concerns. As part of this review,

the inspectors included repetitive or closely-related issues documented by Seabrook

personnel in trend reports, site PIs, major equipment problem lists, system health

reports, maintenance rule assessments, and maintenance or CAP backlogs. The

inspectors also reviewed Seabrooks CAP database for the third and fourth quarters of

2016 to assess CRs written in various subject areas (equipment problems, human

performance issues, etc.), as well as individual issues identified during the NRCs daily

CR review (Section 4OA2.1). The inspectors reviewed Seabrooks quarterly trend report

for the third quarter of 2016, conducted under PI-AA-207-1000, Station Self-Evaluation

and Trending Analysis, Revision 6, to verify that Seabrook personnel were appropriately

evaluating and trending adverse conditions in accordance with applicable procedures.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

The inspectors evaluated a sample of CRs generated over the course of the past two

quarters by departments that provide input to the quarterly trend reports. The inspectors

determined that, in most cases, the issues were appropriately evaluated by Seabrook

staff for potential trends and resolved within the scope of the CAP. Moreover, the

inspectors identified instances where potential adverse trends were identified by

department staff during the course of the assessment period, which were consistent with

similar station-level trends, and confirmed that station personnel were utilizing statistical

and trending tools to identify potential emerging trends. Additionally, the inspectors

verified that discussions between department and performance improvement staff were

occurring to ensure emerging trends were appropriately captured either in the CAP or

the quarterly trend report, as applicable. One such example was the declining rate of

CR initiation recognized by Maintenance personnel under CR 2168318, and the

MRC-identified trend of CR initiation rate under CR 2167899.

The inspectors also confirmed one area of concern of very low safety-significance in

the area of housekeeping. NextEra closed out housekeeping as an adverse trend in

Seabrooks 3rd quarter trend report due to an improved trend noted by station

performance improvement personnel in the previous two quarters. However, the

inspectors observed that the 4th quarter statistical analyses demonstrated that

housekeeping issues were still an area that warranted attention based on the increase

of this metric exceeding the Upper Control Limit and flagged as a potential trend that

warranted further discussions among Seabrook staff. Moreover, this trend was entirely

16

consistent with inspector observations of housekeeping issues during implementation

of baseline inspection throughout the assessment period.

.3 Follow-up of Seal Penetration Degradation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed an in-depth review of Seabrooks corrective actions

following the identification of a degraded containment enclosure ventilation area

(CEVA) penetration seal, in February 2016, as detailed in CR 2107678, Gap

Identified in CEVA Seal 1-PB-021-EV101-7602. The inspectors reviewed the initial

seal inspections conducted in accordance with MX0599.02, 18 Month Inspection of

Technical Requirement Fire Rated Assembly Penetration Seals, Revision 5, and any

associated expansion of inspections required under the inspection program for

identified seal failures.

The inspectors assessed Seabrooks problem identification threshold, applicable cause

analyses, extent of condition reviews, compensatory actions, and the prioritization and

timeliness of corrective actions to determine whether Seabrook was appropriately

identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with this issue and

whether the planned or completed corrective actions were appropriate. The inspectors

compared the actions taken to the requirements of Seabrooks CAP and 10 CFR

Part 50, Appendix B. In addition, the inspectors performed field walkdowns and

interviewed applicable Seabrook personnel to assess the effectiveness of the

implemented corrective actions.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

The inspectors verified that Seabrook had effectively evaluated the failed CEVA seal

penetration, and had previously assessed operability of the seal as documented in the

First Quarter 2016 NRC Inspection Report, 2016-001. The inspectors further observed

and evaluated seal restoration activities, which included a configuration that required

laboratory testing and certification. The repair and installation activities were conducted

under WO 40446460, and the inspectors verified the installed seal design was

consistent with applicable design and licensing basis attributes, and tested in

accordance with the original requirements, based on review of the final vendor test

report.

The inspectors questioned Seabrook staff regarding the condition of other seals within

the similar Category 12 (special seals, fire stops, seismic gaps, etc.) seal population,

based on the standard 10 percent population of seals that are inspected every 18-

months under MX0599.02. Moreover, the inspectors were concerned that seal No. 7602

could have been degraded for years without being appropriately identified, and the

condition of other seals in the same 10 percent population could be potentially degraded

without adequate assessment. As a result, Seabrook personnel initiated CR 2108874,

and evaluated the extent of condition of the other seals that had been previously

inspected during the same timeframe as seal No. 7602. The inspectors evaluated the

resultant response as documented in the CAP and determined that Seabrook staff had

addressed the applicable performance aspects that could have resulted in additional

seals being identified as potentially degraded and not be appropriately addressed within

the CAP.

17

The inspectors evaluated several additional seal inspection results during the

assessment period, i.e., through the fourth quarter of 2016, to verify that continued seal

inspections were being conducted in accordance with applicable program requirements.

In addition, the inspectors verified that as applicable, degraded conditions were being

addressed under the CAP.

.4 Alkali-Silica Reaction Monitoring

a. Inspection Scope

An objective of periodic site visits to Seabrook Station over the past few years has been

to review the adequacy of NextEras monitoring of Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) on

affected reinforced concrete structures, per their Maintenance Rule Structures

Monitoring Program (SMP), and to determine whether the results were appropriately

considered for impact to the Seabrook prompt operability determinations for

ASR-affected structures. A region-based inspector was onsite between October 11-13,

2016, to conduct an inspection of ongoing ASR-related activities relevant to this

objective and to review NextEras corrective actions in response to Notice of Violation

[NOV 05000443/2016008-01]. This NOV was issued by the NRC for failure of the

Seabrook Station staff to complete, in two instances, immediate and prompt operability

assessments for nonconforming conditions when pertinent new information was

developed (see Section 4OA5 below for additional details). The inspector also

conducted in-office reviews of ASR-related documentation.

The inspector assessed the problem identification threshold, operability and functionality

assessments, extent of condition reviews, and the prioritization and timeliness of

corrective actions to determine whether NextEra personnel were appropriately

identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with the ASR-affected

structures. The inspector evaluated NextEras actions to verify compliance with

Engineering Department Standard 36180, SMP, Revision 09, the CAP and in the quality

assurance requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

The inspector toured Seabrook Station with the NRC resident inspectors and NextEra

staff to observe several ASR-affected structures and systems and to status NextEras

activities associated with the installation of new crack monitoring instrumentation and

through-wall expansion monitors (extensometers). The inspector also:

• observed field activities involving the removal of cover concrete from the containment

enclosure building missile shield impinging on the containment outer wall

(EC No. 287308 and Foreign Print 101071)

• examined crack gauges and extensometers in the RHR/CS Equipment Vault and B

Electrical Tunnel, including a review of preliminary data collected from the first three

months of extensometer installation

• reviewed and discussed use of onsite concrete core testing equipment

• reviewed EC No. 285349, Revision 003, Design Change Package for

(RHR/containment spray (CS)) Equipment Vault Monitoring using InVar Rod

Assemblies and the associated 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation, No. 2015-306

• reviewed preliminary results from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

(ASME)Section XI, 2004 Edition, IWL inservice inspection of containment

18

The inspector concluded that NextEra appropriately implemented the station SMP per

procedure and that information from ASR-related activities was appropriately entered

into the Seabrook CAP for proper resolution. However, the inspector noted that the

current revision (Rev. 09) of the Seabrook Station SMP provides a more detailed phased

approach to monitoring and assessing ASR-affected reinforced concrete structures. The

inspector did not review for adequacy the recently implemented structures monitoring

methods. Interim monitoring results and NextEras consideration for impact to current

ASR-affected structures operability determinations were considered reasonable and

appropriate. The SMP, Revision 9, is currently under NRC staff review consistent with

the processing of NextEras license amendment request (LAR) 16-03, dated August 1,

2016 (ML16216A250).

4OA5 Other Activities (3 samples)

.1 (Closed) Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515-192, Inspection of the Licensees Interim

Compensatory Measures Associated with the Open Phase Condition Design

Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Systems

a. Inspection Scope

The objective of this performance-based TI is to verify implementation of interim

compensatory measures associated with an open phase condition (OPC) design

vulnerability in electric power systems for operating reactors. The inspectors verified

NextEra has implemented the following measures to mitigate the potential impact of an

OPC:

• NextEra had identified and discussed with plant staff the lessons-learned from the

OPC events at the US operating plants including the Byron station OPC event and its

consequences. This included conducting operator training for promptly diagnosing,

recognizing consequences, and responding to an OPC event;

• NextEra had updated plant operating procedures to help operators promptly

diagnose and respond to OPC events on off-site power sources credited for safe

shutdown of the plant;

• NextEra had established and continues to implement periodic walkdown activities to

inspect switchyard equipment such as insulators, disconnect switches, and

transmission line and transformer connections associated with the offsite power

circuits to detect a visible OPC; and,

• NextEra had ensured that routine maintenance and testing activities on switchyard

components have been implemented and maintained. As part of the maintenance

and testing activities, NextEra assessed and managed plant risk in accordance with

10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) requirements.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings of significance were identified; therefore, this one-time TI is considered

closed for Seabrook.

19

.2 Licensee Strike Contingency Plans (92709)

a. Inspection Scope

NextEra Energy Seabrook developed a Staffing Contingency Plan to ensure a sufficient

number of qualified personnel were available to continue operations in the event that:

(1) the Utility Workers Union of America (UWUA) Local 555, personnel engaged in a job

action upon the expiration of their contract at midnight, on December 2, 2016; and,

(2) Seabrook Nuclear Security LLC personnel (Formerly known as United Federation of

Special Police and Security Officers (UFSPSO) Union Local 501) engaged in a job

action upon expiration of their contract on December 31, 2016.

Using the guidance contained in NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 92709, Licensee Strike

Contingency Plans, the inspectors reviewed NextEra Energy Seabrooks Staffing

Contingency Plan content, and verified that adequate qualified personnel were identified

to perform key functions necessary for safe operation of the facility. Additionally, the

inspectors selected several key positions that required updated qualifications to ensure

applicable training requirements were met prior to any proposed job action. The

inspector reviewed and/or observed training for key positions including: (1) training of

fire brigade personnel through hands on fire-fighting at the Brentwood Fire Facility, (2)

re-activation of Senior Reactor Operators through requisite amount of hours in the

control room to meet watchstanding requirements, (3) equivalence qualification for key

maintenance activities such as Seismic Monitor calibrations, as well as signed

agreements for switchyard services through New Hampshire Transmission, and (4)

qualification of contingency security officers consistent with NRC rules through live-fire

weapons qualifications at the indoor range.

The inspectors verified the control room staffing plan complied with TS and other NRC

requirements.

On November 28, 2016, NextEra Energy Seabrook and UWUA, Local 555, tentatively

agreed to a new contract and union members approved the contract on December 1,

2016. Additionally, on December 2, 2016, G4S and Seabrook Nuclear Security, LLC,

approved a rolling no job action bridge agreement until contract negotiations could be

finalized.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 (Closed) NOV 05000443/201600801: Failure to Complete Operability Determinations

for ASR-affected Structures

a. Inspection Scope

The objective of IP 92702 is to verify that the root cause(s) for licensee performance

deficiencies resulting in enforcement action have been appropriately identified and to

determine that adequate corrective actions have been implemented to prevent

recurrence. The purpose of this inspection was to review the adequacy of corrective

actions implemented to address an NOV (see EA-16-101 at ML16127A155) involving

NextEras inadequate implementation of NextEra Nuclear Fleet Administrative

Procedure, EN-AA-203-1001, Operability Determinations/Functionality Assessments.

Specifically, NextEra did not prepare and approve Immediate Operability Determinations

20

(IOD) and Prompt Operability Determinations (POD) following the identification of

nonconforming conditions impacting the RHR and CS Equipment Vaults and the

Containment Enclosure Building (CEB). By letter dated June 6, 2016, (ML16161A534)

NextEra provided their response to the NOV.

The inspector used the NOV response to focus the in-office review of associated

documentation and on-site follow-ups, verifications and interviews with responsible

Seabrook staff. The inspector reviewed NextEras causal analysis and actions to

prevent recurrence that included: establishment of a cross-discipline team that provides

routine oversight and review of all ASR-related issues and developments; development

and promulgation of lessons learned from the untimely implementation of

EN-AA-203-1001 and the associated IODs and PODs to all responsible Engineering and

Operations staff members; a comprehensive revision to the Engineering Department

Standard 36180, Structures Monitoring Program, that more closely focuses on ASR

progression monitoring and assessment; and, a revised integrated ASR corrective action

plan that includes the submission of a LAR to reconcile the current licensing basis. This

action was completed with NextEras submittal of a LAR 16-03, dated August 1, 2016

(L16216A240). NextEra has proposed a first-of-its-kind methodology for monitoring the

progression of material property changes caused by ASR and for monitoring structural

deformation (bulk expansion) impacts on overall structural performance. These

monitoring methods are currently being reviewed by NRC staff in the Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulations consistent with the NRC staffs processing of NextEras LAR.

b. Findings and Observations

This violation is closed. Additional observations were documented above in

Section 4OA2.4.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On January 19, 2017, the inspectors presented the inspection results to you and

other members of the Seabrook Station staff. The inspectors verified that no

proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

A-1

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

E. McCartney, Site Vice President

C. Domingos, Plant General Manager

C. Adams, General Supervisor, Operations Training

K. Boehl, Senior Rad Protection Analyst

V. Brown, Licensing Engineer

K. Browne, Licensing Manager

A. Chesno, PI Manager

J. Crowley, CIP Manager

D. Currier, Emergency Planning Manager

T. Fouts, Operations Training Requalification Supervisor

A. Giotos, Sr Analyst

R. Guthrie, System Engineer

M. Hansen, Engineering Site Manager, Systems

D. Hickey, Radiation Protection Supervisor

D. Ritter, Operations Director

D. Robinson, Chemistry Manager

D. Strand, RP Manager

T. Smith, Radiation Protection Supervisor

C. Thomas, Licensing Engineer

J. Tucker, Security Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED

Closed

05000443/2016008-01 NOV Failure to Complete Operability Determinations

for ASR-affected Structures (Section 4OA5.3)

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection

Procedures

OP-AA-102-1002, Seasonal Readiness, Revision 15

Condition Reports

2153879 2155622 2157259 2168322 2169984 2175241

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40426602 40457257 40474933 40507473 40507511 94151166

94151422

Attachment

A-2

Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment

Procedures

OS1016.01, Service Water System Fill and Vent, Revision 19

OS1035.02, Startup Feed Pump Operation, Revision 16

OS1046.07, Vital 480V Operation, Revision 24

OS1048.13, Vital Bus 11A Operation, Revision 15

OX1446.03, Electrical Bus Weekly Operability (Operating), Revision 12

Drawings

1-CO-B20426, Condensate System Detail, Revision 31

1-FW-B20684, Feedwater System Overview, Revision 10

1-FW-B20687, Feedwater System Detail, Revision 30

1-NHY-310013, 480V Unit Substation Buses E-51 & E-52 One Line Diagram, Revision 22

1-NHY-310041, 125VDC & 120VAC Instrument Buses Key One Line Diagram, Revision 18

1-NHY-310042, 125VDC Vital Distribution System One Line Diagram, Revision 4

1-SW-B20794, Service Water System Nuclear Detail, Revision 37

Section 1R05: Fire Protection

Condition Reports

2163607 2163620

Miscellaneous

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume I, Containment Enclosure

Ventilation Area, CE-F-1-A

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume I, Control Building Cable

Spreading Rooms and Mechanical Rooms, CB-F-2A-A

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume II, Service & Circ. Water Pump

House, SW-F-1A-Z

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume II, Turbine Building 50, TB-F-2-0

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume II, Turbine Building 50, TB-F-2-Z

Seabrook Station Fire Protection Pre-Fire Strategies, Volume II, Turbine Building 75, TB-F-3-0

Section 1R06: Flood Protection Measures

Miscellaneous

Report TP-7, Seabrook Station Moderate Line Break Study, Revision 5

UFSAR Section 3.6B Revision 8; Section 9.2, Revision 14

Drawings

9763-F-604139, Cooling Tower Ventilation and Drainage System, Revision 12

Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance

Procedures

MS50515.60, Heat Exchanger Tube Cleaning and Inspection, Revision 1

ES1807.025, Inservice Inspection Visual Examination Procedure, Revision 06

Condition Reports

2169614

A-3

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40502704 4050460

Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program

Procedures

CS0910.01, Primary Systems Sampling at SS-CP-166A, Revision 25

TR-AA-230-1007, Conduct of Simulator Training and Evaluation, Revision 4

OP 9.2, Transient Response Procedure Users Guide, Revision 17

OX1401.03, RCS Vent Path Block Valve Quarterly, Cold Shutdown, and 18 Month Surveillance

Test, Revision 14

OX1436.02, Turbine Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Quarterly and Monthly Valve

Alignment, Revision 27

OX1456.81, Operability Testing of IST Valves, Revision 25

Condition Reports

2176172

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40450687 40451046 40451048

Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness

Procedures

EC-287539, Temporary Clamping Device for Through Wall Leak Repairs, Revision 0

EN-AA-205-1100, Design Change Packages, Revision 19

ES1850.003, Motor Operated Valve Performance Monitoring, Revision 12

PEG-5, Maintenance Rule Program Monitoring Activities, Revision 11

Condition Reports

0188033 0202006 1681551 1790872 1803668 1850566

1853148 1890951 1907568 1968335 2004541 2060360

2081769 2089810 2135419 2136567 2137168 2158711

2159845 2160307 2164045 2166011 2168141

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

01968335 40312977 40438519 40493072 94056612

Drawings

PID-1-SW-B20795, Service Water System Nuclear Detail, Revision 45

Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

Procedures

WM-AA-100, Risk Management Program, Revision 0

WM-AA-100-1000, Work Activity Risk Management, Revision 8

ON1246.03, GSU Trouble, Revision 11

Condition Reports

0000300 0209321 2162696 2164045

A-4

Miscellaneous

EC 287668, 286883

UFSAR Section 8.3, Revision 14

Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments

Procedures

EN-AA-203-1001, Operability Determinations / Functionality Assessments, Revision 22

Condition Reports

2162696

Section 1R18: Plant Modifications

Procedures

EN-AA-202-1001, Engineering and Change Scope Screening, Revision 7

EN-AA-203-1201, 10 CFR Applicability and 10CFR50.59 Screening, Revision 8

EN-AA-203-1201-F02, 10 CFR 50.59 Screening Form, Revision 1, Screen # 2016-246

EN-AA-203-1202, 10CFR50.50 Evaluation, Revision 1

EN-AA-205-1100, Design Change Packages, Revision 19

EN-AA-205-1102, Temporary Configuration Changes, Revision 8

IS1674.414, SWA-T-5610 SW Pump House Fan-38A Control Calibration, Revision 9

IS1674.415, SWA-T-5611 SW Pump House Fan-38B Control Calibration, Revision 7

LX0556.95, 1-EDE-B-1-A Battery Performance Test, Revision 6

LX0556.10, 18 Month Technical Specification Battery Surveillance, Revision 2

LX0556.101, 1-EDE-B-1-A Quarterly Technical Specification Battery Surveillance, Revision 11

MA 3.5, Post Maintenance Testing Guide, Revision 3.5

Condition Reports

2159845 2164045 2166011

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40438519

Miscellaneous

Procedure Change Request (PCR) 02170573, Service Water Pumphouse Ventilation System

Operation, Revision 11

Drawings

1-NHY-300219, Service Environment Chart, Revision 30

Section 1R19: Post-Maintenance Testing

Procedures

AD-AA-100-1006, Procedure and Work Instruction Use and Adherence, Revision 9

ES1807.025, Inservice Inspection Visual Examination Procedure, Revision 6

FP71537, Metal Tube Rotameter Instruction Manual, Revision 0

LS0563.11, Testing of Agastat 125 VDC (7000 Series) TDPU Timing Relays, Revision 11

LS0564.38, 4160 Volt Dynamic Motor Monitoring, Revision 7

LX0557.02, 60 Month PM of 480V US Breakers, Revision 21

MA3.5, Post Maintenance Testing, Revision 19

MA-AA-203-1000, Maintenance Testing, Revision 15

MA3.5, Post Maintenance Testing, Revision 19

A-5

MA-AA-203-1000, Maintenance Testing, Revision 15

OX1412.01, PCCW Train A Operability, 18 Month Position Indication, and Comprehensive

Pump Testing, Revision 21

OX1426.05, DG 1B Monthly Operability Surveillance, Revision 44

Condition Reports

2161853 2162103 2162696 2169614

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

00209321 00628988 40397416 40397420 40437463 40437593

40494053 40502704 40504060

Miscellaneous

EC 287668

MM-AA-201, Minor Maintenance Process, Revision 11

Drawings

PID-1-CC-B20207, Primary Component Cooling Loop A, Revision 12

Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing

Procedures

OP-AA-200, Surveillance Frequency Change Process, Revision 1

OP-AA-200-1001, Evaluation of Proposed Changes to Surveillance Test Intervals, Revision 4

Condition Reports

2072481 2072484 2076687 2171703

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40446945 40451097

Miscellaneous

NEI 04-10, Revision 1

SBK-PRAE-16-004

UFSAR, Revision 17

Section 1EP4: Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

Procedures

ER 3.5, Joint Information Center Operations, Revision 40

ER 3.6, Assembly Area Operations, Revision 31

ER 5.4 Protective Action Recommendations, Revision 35

Section 2RS1: Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls

Procedures

HD095817, Performance of Routine Radiological Surveys, Revision 13

HD0955.50, Far West REM-500 Operation, Revision 6

HN0960.10, Radiological Requirements for Entry Beneath Reactor Vessel, Revision 31

HN0960.17, Radiological Controls for Transfer of Spent Fuel between the Containment and the

Spent Fuel Pool, Revision 4

OA 13-007 Pre-Planned Posting and Survey Instructions, Revision 0

RP-AA-102-1001, Area Radiological Surveys, Revision 1

A-6

RP-AA-103-1001, Posting Requirements for Radiological Hazards, Revision 2

RP-AA-103-1002, High Radiation Area Controls, Revision 3

RP-AA-107-1001, Radioactive Material Receipt, Revision 2

RP-AA-107-1003, Unconditional and Conditional Release of Material, Revision 1

Condition Reports

02142895 02150257 02150260 02151850 02152748 02153269

02154926 02155077 02156307 02170204

Miscellaneous

Air Sample Results AS 16-93 for WPC -8 El, March 2, 2016

Air Sample Results AS 16-95 for CTMT D SG Platform, March 2, 2016

Air Sample Results AS16-280 for FSB 11 El, June 24, 2016

Air Sample Results AS 16-93 for FSB Transfer Canal, June 28, 2016

HD0958.03 Form A Personnel Contamination Report, Badge No 6540, November 13, 2015

HRA\LHRA\VHRA Briefing Acknowledgment Form for Containment Entry, December 7, 2016

LHRA Stay Time Tracking Form for RWP 16-0010, December 7, 2016

LHRA/VHRA Entry Verification for Containment, December 7, 2016

Next Era WBC Analysis Results, SID N130658, July 1, 2016

Next Era WBC Analysis Results, SID N130674, July 1, 2016

Quick Hit/ Department Assessment Report # 02114213 - 2015 Radiation Protection Program

Assessment, July 20, 2016

RP-AA-104-1000-F06 TEDE ALARA Assessment, RWP 16-0091 Transfer Canal Decon and

Liner Repair, May 31. 2016

Seabrook Air Sample Log 2016

Seabrook Station Radiation Protection Program, Revision 67

SB RWP-16-0010, Containment Entry at Power, December 7, 2016

Section 2RS5: Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation

Procedures

HX0958.12, Radiation Protection Response to RDMS Tech Spec and Cat 2 or 3 Monitor

Failures, Revision 15

Condition Reports

02144082 02148262 02148271 02167707 02172340

Miscellaneous

SB System Health Report RM Rad Monitoring 3rd Quarter 2016

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification

Procedures

CS0917.02, Gaseous Effluent Releases, Revision 14

CX0917.01, Liquid Effluent Releases, Revision 20

HD0958.33, Performance of Radiation Protection Supervisory Plant Walkdowns, Revision 6

JD0999.910, Reporting Key Performance Indicators per NEI 99-02, Revision 8

Condition Reports

2159224 2159236

A-7

Miscellaneous

CP 4.1C Release Index Log 2016, November 30, 2016

CS0908.01 Form F - Radioactive Effluent Dose Assessment Report 2016 (Sheets 1 and 2),

December 5, 2016

JD0999.910 Figure 1 Occupational Exposure Occurrence, October, November and

December 2015, dated January 20, 2016

JD0999.910 Figure 1 Occupational Exposure Occurrence, January, February and March 2016,

dated April 6, 2016

JD0999.910 Figure 1 Occupational Exposure Occurrence, April, May and June 2016,

dated September 7, 2016

JD0999.910 Figure 1 Occupational Exposure Occurrence, July, August and September 2016,

dated October 21, 2016

LIC-16014, Documentation Supporting the Seabrook Station 3rd Quarter 2016 Performance

Indicator Submittal, dated October 21, 2016

LIC-16011, Documentation Supporting the Seabrook Station 2nd Quarter 2016 Performance

Indicator Submittal, dated July 27, 2016

LIC-16006, Documentation Supporting the Seabrook Station 1st Quarter 2016 Performance

Indicator Submittal, dated April 20, 2016

LIC-16002, Documentation Supporting the Seabrook Station 4th Quarter 2015 Performance

Indicator Submittal, dated January 27, 2016

LIC-16014, Seabrook Station NRC 3rd Quarter 2016 Performance Indicator Submittal

MSPI Derivation Report for Seabrook Unit 1, September 2016, MSPI Cooling Water System UAI

MSPI Derivation Report for Seabrook Unit 1, September 2016, MSPI Cooling Water System URI

MSPI Derivation Report for Seabrook Unit 1, September 2016, RHR System UAI

MSPI Derivation Report for Seabrook Unit 1, September 2016, RHR System URI

NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7

SBK-PRAE-15-001, Seabrook MSPI Basis Document Update 2014, Revision 0

NextEra - Seabrook Station 2015 Annual Radioactive Release Report, April 24, 2015

Section 4OA2: Problem Identification and Resolution

Procedures

C-S-1-61035, Allowable CEVA Penetration Seal Opening Size, Revision 3

EC-285777, 1-PB-021-EV101-7602, CEVA Penetration Seal Design Detail, S-33, Revision 1

FP4497R-02, Penetration Seal Design, Seal No. PB-021-EV101-7602, Revision 1

PI-AA-207, Trend Coding and Analysis, Revision 11

PI-AA-207-1000-10000, Performance Improvement Trending Analysis Tools, Revision 1

Condition Reports

2004748 2100572 2145108 2146039 2146805 2167947

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40292272 40408502 40436442 40436446

Miscellaneous

Final Report, dated May 3, 2016, Hydrostatic and Pneumatic Pressure Integrity Testing of PCI

Promatec Low Density Foam SE-Foam

Engineering Change (EC) 0287308, dated 9/21/16

Engineering Department Standard 36180, Structure Monitoring Program, Revision 09

Foreign Print No. 101071, CEB Assess Seismic Gaps and Effect of Cutting Missile Shield,

dated 8/30/16

NextEra License Amendment Request 16-03, SBK-l-16071, dated August 1, 2016,

(ML16216A240)

Prompt Operability Determination (POD) AR 02134569, Fuel Storage Building, dated 6/30/16

A-8

POD AR-1977456, RHR/CS Vault, Revision 2

POD AR-2094762, CEB, Revision 1

POD AR-1804477, Containment, Revision 0

Seabrook Station Engineering Procedure, ES1807.031, Inservice Inspection Procedure Primary

Containment Section XI IWL Program, Revision 4

Section 4OA5: Other Activities

Procedures

ES1807.16, Thermography Program, Revision 5

OP-AA-100-1001-F01, License Watch-Standing Record, Revision 0

OP-AA-100-1001-F02, License Activation/Reactivation Approval, Revision 0

OP-AA-100-1001-F05, Seabrook Comprehensive Plant Tour, Revision 0

OAI.22A, Returning to Shift Checklist, Revision 46

TR-AA-230-1004-F06, Alternate Qualification Form, Revision 2

QM 3.1, Maintenance Group Job Incumbent Qualification Worksheet, Revision 6

Condition Reports

02120109 02134569 02140522 1732579 1731646

Maintenance Orders/Work Orders

40464635 40460820

Miscellaneous

Apparent Cause Evaluation Report CR2130728, dated 5/26/16

Day & Zimmerman Agreement dated 10/21/16, Article XXVI: Work Stoppages

Engineering Evaluation EE-13-016, Seabrook Station Response to NEI Open Phase Condition

Initiative, Revision 0

ERO Staffing Succession Plan - 10/14/16

G4S RSS Seabrook Nuclear Station Staffing Contingency Plan, dated September 19, 2016

Miscellaneous Badge Access Transaction Reports

NextEra Energy Seabrook letter SBK-L-16076, dated June 6, 2016 (ML16161A534)

NextEra Energy Seabrook Staffing Contingency Plan

SBK LOP L3554C122, Seabrook Licensed Operator Requalification Training, Phase 12-02

SBK LOP L5076C123, Seabrook Licensed Operator Requalification Training, Phase 12-03

Strike Contingency Primary Watch Station Qualification Guide, #SBK NLO N0050Q, Revision 0

A-9

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agencywide Document Access and Management System

ANSI American National Standards Institute

ARP alarm response procedure

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASR alkali-silica reaction

CAP corrective action program

CEB containment enclosure building

CEVA containment enclosure ventilation area

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CR condition report

CS containment spray

CT cooling tower

EAL emergency action level

EC engineering change

EDG emergency diesel generator

EFW emergency feedwater

I&C instrumentation and controls

IOD immediate operability determination

IP inspection procedure

LAR license amendment request

MR Maintenance Rule

NEI Nuclear Energy Institute

NOV notice of violation

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

OPC open phase condition

PCCW primary component cooling water

PI performance indicator

POD prompt operability determination

PORV power operated relief valve

PRT pressurizer relief tank

RG Regulatory Guide

RHR residual heat removal

RP radiation protection

RWP radiation work permit

SMP structures monitoring program

SRO senior reactor operator

SSC structure, system, or component

SW service water

TI temporary instruction

TRM technical requirements manual

TS technical specification

UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

UFSPSO United Federation of Special Police and Security Officers

US unit substation

UWUA Utility Workers Union of America

VDC voltage direct current

WO work order