ML17170A198: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/31/2016
| issue date = 10/31/2016
| title = 2017 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-201-2
| title = 2017 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-201-2
| author name = Reeser D W
| author name = Reeser D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                   Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                     Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant                                                               Date of Examination:   02/17/2017 Initials Item                                                     Task Description a     b*       c#
Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination:
1.
02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. w a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Ju. lr T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
w
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 8-E c. N J..,. d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.  
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.     J,.. P/A     (j.-
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of Ju. ? normal evolutions, instrument and component  
R       b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T
: failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.         Ju.            lr I~              8-T E        c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule fct?-L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified  
N
: scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s),
: d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.         J..,.            ~
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and uz-R c. quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:  
2.
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form iJL L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form. H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
s
0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (F-u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of c. ,;?--applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the iJ-appropriate exam sections.
: a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
G 6l-E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
Ju.            ?
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. JZ.. E c. R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. uz-A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.  
I M       b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u           mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). t{M oz.-Printed rt:f Date a. Author Dell McNeil 1 W /?tctf?t.  
A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
                                                                                                                      ~              fct?-
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
T           applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
o.,;, Ree"' I  
0 R
: d. NRC Supervisor  
: c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.                       ~              uz-
'L
: 3.       a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
* Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w                 among the safety functions as specified on the form A
L (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)                                       ~                iJL K           (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T                 the form.
H R         b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 0
u           (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified                                               ~~              (F-G           (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                               ~                ,;?--
                                                                                                                      ~
: 4.       a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.                                                                                           iJ-G E         b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                 ~              6l-N E
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.           ~                JZ..
R A
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.                                               ~              uz-L       e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                       ~              ~
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).                                   t{M     ~~    oz.-
Printed ~ffiignature        rt:f                                               Date W
                                                                                                                            ~
: a. Author                           Dell McNeil 1                     /?tctf?t.
                                                                                                                            ~.i:IL
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)           n/a
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)         o.,;, Ree"'       I ~
: d. NRC Supervisor                 RobertOrlikowskiL==-~                'L
* Note:                   # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 1 of 28}}
ES-201, Page 1 of 28}}

Latest revision as of 01:59, 30 October 2019

2017 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-201-2
ML17170A198
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/2016
From: David Reeser
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML16242A222 List:
References
Download: ML17170A198 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: 02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Ju. lr I~ 8-T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

N

d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. J..,. ~

2.

s

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

Ju.  ?

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the

~ fct?-

T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~ uz-
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A

L (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~ iJL K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 0

u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ~~ (F-G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~ ,;?--

~

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. iJ-G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~ 6l-N E
c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ JZ..

R A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ uz-L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~ ~
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). t{M ~~ oz.-

Printed ~ffiignature rt:f Date W

~

a. Author Dell McNeil 1 /?tctf?t.

~.i:IL

b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) o.,;, Ree"' I ~
d. NRC Supervisor RobertOrlikowskiL==-~ 'L
  • Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 1 of 28