ML17170A198: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                   Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                     Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant                                                               Date of Examination:   02/17/2017 Initials Item                                                     Task Description a     b*       c#
Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination:
1.
02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. w a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Ju. lr T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 8-E c. N J..,. d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
w
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of Ju. ? normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.     J,.. P/A     (j.-
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule fct?-L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and uz-R c. quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
R       b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form iJL L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form. H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.         Ju.            lr I~              8-T E        c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (F-u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of c. ,;?--applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the iJ-appropriate exam sections.
N
G 6l-E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
: d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.         J..,.            ~
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. JZ.. E c. R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. uz-A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
2.
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). t{M oz.-Printed rt:f Date a. Author Dell McNeil 1 W /?tctf?t.
s
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
: a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
Ju.            ?
o.,;, Ree"' I
I M       b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u           mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
: d. NRC Supervisor  
A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
'L
                                                                                                                      ~              fct?-
* Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
T           applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 R
: c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.                       ~              uz-
: 3.       a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w                 among the safety functions as specified on the form A
L (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)                                       ~                iJL K           (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T                 the form.
H R         b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 0
u           (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified                                               ~~              (F-G           (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                               ~                ,;?--
                                                                                                                      ~
: 4.       a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.                                                                                           iJ-G E         b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                 ~              6l-N E
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.           ~                JZ..
R A
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.                                               ~              uz-L       e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                       ~              ~
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).                                   t{M     ~~    oz.-
Printed ~ffiignature        rt:f                                               Date W
                                                                                                                            ~
: a. Author                           Dell McNeil 1                     /?tctf?t.
                                                                                                                            ~.i:IL
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)           n/a
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)         o.,;, Ree"'       I ~
: d. NRC Supervisor                 RobertOrlikowskiL==-~                'L
* Note:                   # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 1 of 28}}
ES-201, Page 1 of 28}}

Latest revision as of 02:59, 30 October 2019

2017 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-201-2
ML17170A198
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/2016
From: David Reeser
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML16242A222 List:
References
Download: ML17170A198 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: 02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Ju. lr I~ 8-T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

N

d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. J..,. ~

2.

s

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

Ju.  ?

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the

~ fct?-

T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~ uz-
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A

L (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~ iJL K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 0

u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ~~ (F-G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~ ,;?--

~

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. iJ-G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~ 6l-N E
c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ JZ..

R A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ uz-L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~ ~
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). t{M ~~ oz.-

Printed ~ffiignature rt:f Date W

~

a. Author Dell McNeil 1 /?tctf?t.

~.i:IL

b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) o.,;, Ree"' I ~
d. NRC Supervisor RobertOrlikowskiL==-~ 'L
  • Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 1 of 28