JAFP-16-0094, Transmittal of Emergency Plan Updates for James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Transmittal of Emergency Plan Updates for James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant

ML16174A123
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	05/31/2016
From:	Jackie Jones Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
JAFP-16-0094 EN-EP-900, Rev 3
Download: ML16174A123 (14)

Text

JAFP-16-0094 May 31, 2016 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Transmittal of Emergency Plan Updates James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-333 License No. DPR-059

Dear Sir or Madam:

Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear*operations, Inc. James A. FitzPatrick NPP P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Tel 315-342-3840 James D. Jones Emergency Preparedness Manager The documents enclosed with this letter are changes to the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant's (JAF) Emergency Plan made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(q).

This transmittal fulfills the requirements of 1 O CFR 50.54( q), 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section V, 10 CFR 70.32(i), and 1 O CFR 72.44(f) to inform the Commission of changes that have been made which do not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. The following documents (including change documentation and screening) are attached:

• EN-EP-900

-Revision 3 This letter contains no new regulatory commitments.

If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. James D. Jones at (315) 349-6030.

Sincerely, James D. Jones Emergency Preparedness Manager JDJ:cfv Enclosure( s ): Including change documentation and screening:

• EN-EP-900, Revision *3 cc w/o procedure documentation and screening:

USNRC (l&E) Regional Administrator, Region I -Controlled -2 Copies NRC Resident Inspector

-Controlled -1 Copy NRC Director NMSS -Uncontrolled -1 Copy JAFP-16-0094

• Page 2 of 2 NRC Director Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation

-Uncontrolled -1 Copy NRC Director, Division ot Security Policy -Uncontrolled -1 Copy

• NYSEMO -Controlled -1 Copy OCEMO -Controlled -1 Copy JAFP-16-0094 Enclosures EN-EP-900

-Revision 3 (including change documentation and screening)

• NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-Ll-106 REV.15 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 1 OF2 NRC Correspondence ATTACHMENT 9.4 NRC SUBMITTAL REVIEW Letter ff.: JAFP-16-:0094 Response Due; 6/8/2016

Subject:

Tra*nsmittal .of Plan Updates Date for 5/31/2016 Preparer I Phone.#: Cathee Vickery 31'5-349-9771 Section I Letter Concurrence and Agreement to Perform Actions POSITJON I NAIV!E Action* . Signature (concurrence, certification, etc.) . (sign, interoffice e-njail, or telecom) Emergency Planning Dept. Preparer/Reviewer Cathee Vickery '!tt;!it! .r,j C LI Licensing Department Concurrence Mark Hawes I Ji---I ' Emergency Preparedness Approver James D. Jones I Manager v -COMMENTS -EN-EP-900, Revision 3 Section II Correspondence Screening Does this letter contain commitments?

If "yes," identify the commitments with due Yes 0 dates in the submittal and in Section Ill. When fleet letters contain commitments, a No PCRS LO (e.g., LO-LAR, LO-WT) should be initiated with a CA assigned to each applicable site to enter the commitments into the site's commitment management system. Does this letter contain any information or analyses of new safety issues performed at Yes 0 NRC request or to satisfy a regulatory requirement?

If "yes," reflect requirement to No update the UFSAR in Section Ill. Does this letter require any document changes (e.g., procedures, DBDs, UFSAR, TS Yes 0 Bases, etc.), if approved?

If "yes," indicate in Section Ill an action for the responsible No department to determine the affected documents. (The Correspondence Preparer may indicate the specific documents requiring revision, if known or may initiate an . action for review.) Does this letter contain information certified accurate?

If "yes," identify the information Yes 0 and document certification in an attachment. (Attachment 9.5 must be used.) No EN-Ll-106 REV 15

• • NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-Ll-106 REV.15 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 20F2 NRC Correspondence ATTACHMENT 9.4 NRC SUBMITTAL REVIEW Section Ill Actions and Commitments Required Actions Note: Actions needed upon approval should be captured in the Due Date Responsible Dept. appropriate action tracking system N/A Commitments Note: When fleet letters contain commitments, a PCRS LO should be initiated with a CA assigned to each applicable Due Date Responsible Dept. site to enter the commitments into the site's commitment management system. N/A Section IV Final Document Signoff for Submittal Correspondence Preparer Cathee Vickery I &z;r...£.t' Final Submittal Review (optional) ( N/A Responsible Department Head James. D. Jones I t._ -1t_)

' \I EN-Ll-106 REV 15

• *

• NON-QUALITY RELATED EN-EP-900 REV.3 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL REFERENCE USE PAGE 1OF6 Emergency Preparedness Forms Procedure Revision Type: New D NON-Editorial

[8J Editorial D TC D Cancellation D HQN Procedure Owner: Dean Burnett Governance Owner: Mary Ann Wilson Effective Title: Director, Emergency Title: Director, Emergency Date Site: Programs Site: Programs 05/27/16 HQN HQNWPO Site Site Procedure Champion Title ANO N/A N/A BRP N/A N/A CNS N/A NIA GGNS Jeff Seiter ManaQer, EP IPEC Lori Glander Manager, EP JAF James Jones Manager, EP PLP Dan Malone Manager, EP PNPS N/A N/A RBS Tim Schenk Manager, EP VY N/A N/A W3 N/A N/A HQN N/A N/A For site implementation dates see ECH eB REFLIB usmg site tree view (Nav1gat1on panel) Site and NMM Procedures Canceled or Superseded By This Revision N/A Process Applicability Exclusion:

All Sites: LJ Specific Sites: ANO D BRP D GGNS D IPEC[8] JAF D PLP D PNPSO RBS D VY D W3 D Change Statement Revision 3 adds guidance to revise EP Fleet Forms and storing Forms in EB . Associated PRHQN #: PRHQN 2016-00174 j Procedure Writer: D. Townsend Contains Proprietary Information:

YES D NO l:8l NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL REFERENCE USE PAGE 2 OF 6 Section 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 Emergency Preparedness Forms TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE ............................................................... , .........................................

3 REFERENCES

..................................................................................................

3 DEFINITIONS

....................................................................................................

3 RESPONSIBILITIES

..........................................................................................

3 DETAILS .........................................................................................................

3 INTERFACES

....................................................................................................

4 RECORDS .........................................................................................................

4 SITE SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS

.......................................................................

4 ATTACHMENTS

................................................................................................

4 ATTACHMENT 9.1 CURRENT LIST OF EFFECTIVE FORMS ...................................................

5 ATTACHMENT 9.2 FORM REVIEW AND APPROVAL .............................................................

6 * *

• *

• NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED REFERENCE USE EN-EP-900 REV.3 PAGE 3 OF6 Emergency Preparedness Forms 1.0 PURPOSE [1] This procedure controls Forms used by the Emergency Response Organization during emergencies.

2.0 REFERENCES

[1] Sites Emergency Plans [2] Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 [11 5.0 5.1 [11 [2] 5.2 [11 NONE RESPONSIBILITIES The Emergency Planning Department is responsible for maintaining forms used by the Emergency Response Organization in accordance with this procedure.

DETAILS USE OF FORMS The Implementing Procedure that calls for a form to be completed will control the actual use of forms. Any needed instructions for form completion will either be on the form itself or in the procedure calling for its use. CONTROL OF FORMS Forms are numbered sequentially as the need for them is defined by other implementing procedures. (a) Form numbers will be formatted as "EP-n-Site or All Rev x", where n is the sequential number of the form and x is the current revision of the form. For the Site, the designator will be as designated in PCRS. If All sites use the form, then All will be used. 5.3 METHOD OF PLACING FORMS IN THIS PROCEDURE

[1] Forms are attached as addendums to this procedure.

They will appear formatted in the end use format. There will be no annotation on the addendums or actual forms showing addendum number or procedure page number. [2] Attachment 9.1, Current List of Effective Forms will list all effective forms and the number of pages in each form. [3] The Effective Forms are located Echelon-+eB-+Forms-+Emergency Preparedness.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL REFERENCE USE PAGE 4 OF 6 Emergency Preparedness Forms 5.4 METHOD OF REVISING FORMS [1] Acquire current Form to be revised from eB -+Echelon

-+Forms-+EP Forms. [2] Revise Form as necessary and save as next sequential revision number. [3] Send Revised Form to appropriate Sites and EP Director for review and comment. [4] Incorporate or resolve any comments received during reviews. [5] Send Final Form to appropriate sites and Director, EP for approval using Attachment 9.2. [6] Transmit the revised form (native and PDF File) and the completed Form Review and Approval (Attachment 9.2) to Records in accordance with EN-AD-103.

[7] Communicate Effective Date to the appropriate sites with a 2 week lead time, if possible.

6.0 INTERFACES

[1] EN-EP-609, Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Operations

[2] EN-EP-610, Technical Support Center (TSC) Operations

[3] EN-EP-611, Operations Support Center (OSC) Operations 7.0 RECORDS [1] Forms completed by members of the ERO during an actual declared emergency are permanent quality records and are maintained in accordance with EN-AD-103.

8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS

[1] None 9.0 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 9.1 Current List of Effective Forms Attachment 9.2 Form Review and Approval * *

)*. I ,

• ATTACHMENT 9.1 Page 1of1 Form Number EP-1-ALL EP-2-ALL EP-3-ALL EP-4-ALL EP-5-ALL EP-6-ALL EP-7-ALL EP-8-ALL EP-9-ALL

• EP-10-ALL EP-11-ALL EP-12-ALL EP-13-ALL EP-14-ALL

• NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED REFERENCE USE EN-EP-900 REV.3 PAGE 5 OF 6 Emergency Preparedness Forms CURRENT LIST OF EFFECTIVE FORMS Form Title Interfacing (number of pages if> 1) Procedures This has been intentionally left blank None Essential Information Form (2 pages) EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Log Sheet Form EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Exposure Authorization Form (2 pages) EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Team Dispatching Form EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Team Tracking Form EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Facility Sign-In/Accountability Form (2 pages) EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Kl Instructions/Briefing Form EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 NRC Form-361, Reactor Plant Event Notification EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Worksheet (2 pages) Filling an ERO Vacancy During Facility Site Specific CR procedures/EN-EP-Activation/Operation Form 609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Repair & Corrective Action Assignment Form (3 pages) EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611 Engineering Task Assignment Form (2 pages) EN-EP-610 NRC Briefing Form EN-EP-609 Briefing Form EN-EP-609, EN-EP-610, EN-EP-611

' -

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL REFERENCE USE PAGE 6 OF 6 Emergency Preparedness Forms ATTACHMENT 9.2 FORM REVIEW AND APPROVAL Page 1of1 Form No: I Revision No: Title: Preparer's Name: Reason for Revision:

Review I Approval (Approval can be via email): Site Name Date ANO GGNS RBS WF3 IPEC PLP JAF VY N/A N/A PNPS N/A N/A Form change approved by: Director, EP Date Effective Date: *

• *

• ATTACHMENT 9.1 SHEET 1OF3 Procedure/Document Number: EN-EP-900 EquipmentJFacility/Other:

JAF Title: Emergency Preparedness Forms 10CFR50.54(q)

SCREENING

-I Revision:

3 Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): Item 1. Changes the location where the EP Fleet Forms are stored from a Fleet drive to EB Ref-Lib. This change makes the forms retrievable by ERO members. Item 2. Added guidance to procedure for revising EP Fleet Forms. Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed?

DYES 1:8;] NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q)(3)

Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Evaluation is next part NOT required.

Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justification ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and proposed change is documented below: complete Part VI. Justification:

D Bounding document attached (optional)

Part Ill. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes Check if any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activity.(Refer to EN-Ll-100)

NOTE: For example, when a design change is the proposed activity, consequential actions may include changes to other documents which have a different change control process and are NOT to be included in this 50.54(q)(3)

Screeninq.

APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 1:8;] If there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(3)

Screening.

D One or more controlling change processes are selected, however, some portion of the activity involves.the emergency plan or affects the implementation of the emergency plan; continue the 50.54(q)(3)

Screening for that portion of the activity.

Identify the applicable controlling change processes below. D One or more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the activity.

50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation is NOT required.

Identify controllinq chanqe processes below and complete Part VI. CONTROLLING CHANGE PROCESSES 10CFR50.54 (q) PartlV.EdttorialChange DYES 50.54(q)(J)

C\>ntinue to next Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, paragraph Evaluation is part numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT required.

Justification:

Enter justification and complete Part VI. EN-EP-305 REV 3 ATTACHMENT 9.1 SHEET 2 OF 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SCREENING

--**---. Procedure/Document Number: EN-EP-900 I Revision:

3 EquipmenUFacility/Other:

JAF Title: Emergency Preparedness Forms Part V. Emergency Planning ElemenUFunction Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in brackets)

Does this activity affect any of the following, including program elements from NU REG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? 1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned.

(1 J D 2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (24/7 D staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1 J 3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned.

[2J D 4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained.

[2J D 5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3) D 6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3] D 7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D 8. Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of D the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications.

[5J 9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. [5) 10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. [5J 11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations.

[6J 12. Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel.

(6J D 13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). [7J 14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established.

[7J D 15. Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response.

[8J D 16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response.

(8) D 17. Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. (9) 0 18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies.

(1 OJ D 19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are 0 available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities.

(1 OJ 20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including 0 those for hostile action events.[1 OJ EN-EP-305 REV 3 * *

'1111.*' * *

• ATTACHMENT 9.1 SHEET 3 OF 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SCREENING Procedure/Document Number: EN-EP-900

\ Revision:

3 EqulpmenUFacflity/Other:

JAF Title: Emergency Preparedness Forms 21. The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established.

[11] Ll 22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals.

(12] D 23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed.

[13] u 24. A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program Ll areas) is established.

(14] 25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, Ll maintain, and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses.

(14] 26. Identified weaknesses are corrected.

(14] u 27. Training is provided to emergency responders.

(15] u 28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established.

(16] D 29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. (16] Ll APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for conclusion below and complete Part VI. O If any Part V criteria are checked, complete Part VI and perform a 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation.

BASIS FOR CONCLUSION Item 1 -This change reflects the EP Fleet Forms, used by the sites, are stored on the company's Electronic Data Management System (eB) verse a fleet drive. This change makes the Form retrievable by ERO members. Only select individuals had access to the fleet drive where the Forms were previously stored. This change does not result in a change to the Emergency Plan, alter the meaning or intent of this procedure, affect any facilities or equipment, or any process described in the procedure.

No further evaluation is required on this change. Item 2 -This change added guidance to the procedure for revising EP Fleet Forms. This guidance ensures that form revisions are processed in a consistent manner and the sites are aware of and approve of changes made to any Form. This change does not result in a change to the Emergency Plan, alter the meaning or intent of this procedure, affect any facilities or equipment, or any process described in the procedure.

No further evaluation is required on this change. Part VI. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print) JQ;hp;rer

/ (j 0;/ 3//i Debrll J. \kaAer*h (Optional)

Reviewer Name(Printi' Reviewer Signature u 0 Date: "F"-/ Date: ,e

-5/cf/lr; Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print) AW""'* Date: '-t-1o [I,, EP manager or designee EN-EP-305 REV 3