ML18128A084

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Attachment 5 - EP-AA-1014, Addendum 1, Revision 0, On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
ML18128A084
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, FitzPatrick, 07201036  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2018
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18128A077 List:
References
[[::JAF-18-0040|JAF-18-0040]], NMP1L3209 EP-AA-1014, Addendum 1, Rev 0
Download: ML18128A084 (76)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 5 Radiological Emergency Plan Addendum Revision EP-AA-1014, Addendum 1, Revision 0, "On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant"

~ Exelon Generation EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant On-Shift S_taffing Analysis Report

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4 II. ANALYSIS

SUMMARY

....................................................................................................................... 4 A. Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing ...................................................................................... 5 B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing ................................................................................... 6 C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS) ....................................................... 6 D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed ................................................................................. 7 Ill. ANALYSIS PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ 7 IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS ................................................................................................................... 9 A. Accident Selection .................................................................................................................. 9

8. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis ........................................................ :............. 9 C. Accident Scenarios not included in the Analysis ............................................................. 10 V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ......................................................................... 11 A. Notes and Assumptions applicable to all accidents in JAF Staffing Analysis: ............ 11 B. NEI 10-05 Rev O Assumptions ........................................................................................... 11 VI. APPENDIX A - ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS ........................................................... 14 VII. APPENDIX B - ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 16 A. Accident Analysis #1 - Design Basis Threat (DST) ........................................................ 16 B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #2 - Control Rod Drop Accident ................................ 22 C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Loss of Coolant Accident ................................... 28 D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4 - Fuel Handling Accident ...................................... 34 E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Main Steam Line .Break ...................................... 40 F. Accident Analysis #6 -Aircraft Probable Threat ............................................................. 46 G. Accident Analysis #7 - Control Room Fire Requiring Evacuation and Remote Shutdown ............................................................................................................................... 52 H. Accident Analysis #8 - Station Blackout ........................................................................... 58 I. Accident Analysis #9 - LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR ............... 64 VIII. APPENDIX C- TIME MOTION STUDIES SUPPORTING THE STAFFING ANALYSIS ...... 70 IX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED .......................... 74 A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures ................................................................... 74 Page 2 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis X. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 74 XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM ............................................................................................................ 74 Page 3 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis I. INTRODUCTION This document is a revision to the James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report added to the JAF Emergency Plan on December 20, 2012. This revision incorporates the use of a dual-role individual to perform the function and task of the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) as allowed by NEI 10-05. The NEI 10-05 Tables in Sections VI I of this report were also updated to reflect the corrective actions taken for task overlaps listed in Section IX of the original report (Revision 0). Additionally,Section VII. D. of this report was revised to reflect plant mode requirements for STA staffing as required by station Technical Specifications.

This revision continues to satisfy the requirement of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9, which states that nuclear power licensees shall perform "a detailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency plan implementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timely performance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan." A structured approach was utilized to perform this analysis using the guidance found in NEI 10-05, Rev. 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities. This analysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in Table 5-1 of the JAF Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, until augmenting Emergency Response Organization (ERO) staff arrives in accordance with the E-Plan.

II. ANALYSIS

SUMMARY

The OSA team determined that an on-shift staff of fourteen (14) is required to respond to the most limiting accident scenario reviewed, main control room fire and shutdown at the remote shutdown panel. The on-shift staff consists of individuals necessary to support each of the emergency plan functional areas or tasks:

  • Emergency Direction and Control
  • Fire Fighting (FB)
  • Accident Assessment
  • Radiation Protection and Chemistry
  • Notification/Communication
  • Technical Support
  • Accountability NEI 10-05 states it is acceptable for certain function to be assigned to personnel already assigned other functions/tasks. These include Repair and Corrective Action, Rescue Operations and First Aid.

' Page 4 of 74 I

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis A. Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing Per 10 CFR 50.54 (q)(1 )(iii), Emergency planning function means a capability or resource necessary to prepare for and respond to a radiological emergency, as set forth in the elements of section IV of Appendix E and, for nuclear power reactor licensees, the planning standards of§ 50.47(b).

The following table indicates the result of the NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing basis requirement for each on-shift position.

These positions are included on Table 1 of each accident analysis.

On-Shift Licensing Basis Staffing Position E-Plan Functional Area Requirement Analysis Results 50.54m Emergency Direction Shift Manager (SM) E-Plan Table 5-1 1 and Control 50.54m Control Room Supervisor (CRS) E-Plan Table 5-1 SSD 1 Shift Technical Advisor (STA)/ E-Plan Table 5-1 2 Technical Support 1 Field Support Supv. (FSS) 50.54m SSD Senior Nuclear Operator (RO #1) 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 50.54m Senior Nuclear Operator (RO #2) SSD 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 50.54m FB Senior Nuclear Operator (RO #3) 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Operator (NPO #1) E-Plan Table 5-1 SSD 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 FB Nuclear Plant Operator (NPO #2) 1 Nuclear Plant Operator (NPO #3) E-Plan Table 5-1 FB 1 Nuclear Plant Operator (NPO #4) E-Plan Table 5-1 FB 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 Communications Nuclear Plant Operator (NPO #5) 1 Notifications 1

Fire Brigade #5 E-Plan Table 5-1 FB 1 E-Plan Table 5-1 Accident RP/ Chemistry Technician 1 AssessmenUChemistry Radiation Protection (RP) E-Plan Table 5-1 Radiation Protection 1 Technician Security Contingency Per Security Security Plan/E-Plan Table 5-1 Accountability Contingency Plan TOTAL 14 1 . .

May be filled by Fire Brigade qualified staff from Operations or other departments such as Security .

2 STA function may be filled by SM, CRS or FSS qualified as STA.

Page 5 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing None C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS)

1. The primary responsibility for the on-shift Chemistry Technician is chemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were noted as being required within the first 90 minutes of any of the analyzed events. The task of dose assessment is implemented when directed by the Shift Manager and therefore will not overlap. It is therefore acceptable to assign the Chemistry Technician the E-Plan function of dose assessment. No further analysis or TMS is required.
2. The Shift Manager is assigned the responsibility to make some site specific event notifications such as to the Duty Plant Manager, Operations Manager, and Resident Inspector. These notifications by phone are considered communications that are approximately one minute in length and are acceptable tasks for the Shift Manager. No further analysis or TMS is required.
3. Station staff are required to maintain continuous communications with the notification source during an aircraft threat in accordance with 10CFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. There are no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is not required to be assigned in advance. The analysis of this event identified there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this task during the event. Specifically, a Nuclear Plant Operator or the RP/Chemistry Technician can be made available to fill this function. No further analysis or TMS is required.
4. The STA position at JAF is normally filled by an individual with the title STA/FSS as noted in the staffing table located in Section II.A. of this report. The JAF Emergency Plan Table 5-1, "Plant Personnel - Emergency Activity Assignments", states the STA position may also be filled by the SM or CRS. This allowance is in-line with NRG Generic Letter 86-04, "Policy Statement on Engineering Expertise On-Shift", and NEI 10-05 that states it is acceptable for the STA position to be filled by an STA qualified individual already serving in another on-shift role (dual-role individual). Additionally, the ability of the on-shift staff to implement emergency response functions while serving in the dual-role capacity is periodically observed and evaluated during Operations Training. This analysis was conducted assuming the STA role was filled by the SM, but as noted above, the role may also be filled by the CRS or FSS. As stated in NEI 10-05, this is an acceptable collateral duty assignment that does not require a TMS.
5. Security or the Shift Manager may perform the task of notifying the off-shift ERO of the emergency. A TMS was conducted to ensure the Shift Manager could perform the concurrent tasks of maintaining emergency direction and control while notifying the ERO of the event using Everbridge. The TMS found in Appendix C demonstrated the Shift Manager was able to maintain Emergency Direction and Control during the approximate 1 minute and 55 seconds it took to notify the ERO using Everbridge. The TMS shows that notifying the ERO is an acceptable task for the Shift Manager and no further analysis or additional TMS are required.

Page 6 of 74 L_

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed

1. Repair and Corrective Action - Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-1, repair and corrective action tasks may be performed by shift personnel assigned other functions. Repair and corrective action is defined as:
  • An action that can be performed promptly to restore a non-functional component to functional status (e.g., resetting a breaker), or to place a component in a desired configuration (e.g.,
  • open a valve), and which does not require work planning or implementation of lockouUtagout controls to complete.

In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.5, the analysis included a review of repair and corrective action tasks. Fe>r the purpose of this analysis, the tasks were considered to fall into two broad categories:

  • Unplanned/unexpected actions that address equipment failures. These actions are contingent in nature and cannot be specified in advance.

At JAF, Nuclear Plant Operators are trained to perform the actions associated with this functional area. Actions (e.g., reset breakers, valve manipulation) directed by the Control Room Supervisor to mitigate the event per procedures were performed by the Nuclear Plant Operators in this analysis. Repair and Corrective Action is an acceptable collateral duty per the guidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed

2. Rescue Operations and First Aid: In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.6, the analysis also included a review of rescue operations and first aid response although neither task was required during the evaluated scenarios. Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-1, rescue operations and first aid may be performed by shift personnel assigned other functions. Two staff members per shift (Operations and/or RP/Chemistry Technician are trained and assigned to perform first aid duties. The station fire brigade staff is trained in rescue operations and is available if required. Rescue operations and first aid response are acceptable collateral duties per the guidance of NEI 10-05.

Ill. ANALYSIS PROCESS This analysis was conducted by a joint team of corporate Emergency Preparedness (EP) personnel and station personnel from the Operations, Training, Radiation Protection, Chemistry and Emergency Preparedness (EP) departments. Additionally, members of the Security staff provided input to the analysis. The team members are identified in Section XI of this report.

The emergency response to each event was determined by conducting a tabletop of the event using the emergency plan and procedures and the applicable department procedures such as Operations emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

Each scenario was reviewed by the cross disciplinary team to determine what plant actions and emergency plan implementation actions were required based on plant procedures prior to staff augmentation. These actions were then compared to the minimum staffing for Emergency Plan implementation as described in the Emergency Plan Table 5-1, ensuring that no actions were assigned to staff members that conflicted with either their dedicated Page 7 of 74 L J

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis emergency plan role or their dedicated operational role as appropriate. In cases where multiple tasks were assigned to an individual in their role, the team evaluated timing of the tasks to ensure that they could be performed by the individual in series within any specified time requirements.

The results of the analysis for each of the scenarios are included in Section VII, APPENDIX B - ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS. Note that NSIR DPR-ISG-01 states that only DBA accidents "which would result in an emergency declaration" should be evaluated in the staffing assessment. Each of JAF DBA's were evaluated and classified according to its FSAR Chapter 14 description. If the accident description alone did not result in a classification, the projected accident EAB dose found in the FSAR was utilized to determine if an EAL threshold would be exceeded within the first 90 minutes using the Abnormal Radiation Level EAL thresholds. In cases where several projected dose rates were provided or release data was not detailed significantly to determine an EAL, the assessment used the radiological consequences associated with the realistic case in accordance with NEI 10-05.

Page 8 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS A. Accident Selection

1. The OSA scenarios were chosen using the guidance of NEI 10-05 and NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance- Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants." The evaluation considered the station Design Basis Accidents (OBA) described in the USAR along with additional scenarios specified by the guidance documents. The scenarios considered were:
  • Design Basis Threat (DBT) ground assault as described in NEI 10-05
  • OBA Loss of Coolant Accident, (LOCA) as described in FSAR 14.6.1.3.
  • OBA Fuel Handling Accident (FHA) as described in FSAR 14.6.1.4.
  • Aircraft Probable Threat as described in NEI 10-05
  • Fire requiring evacuation of the Control Room and plant shutdown from remote location, (Appendix R Fire) as described in NEI 10-05.
  • General Emergency with radioactive release and PAR as described in NEI 10-05.
  • Appendix R Fire That Results in a Reactor Trip B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis
1. Design Basis Threat
  • The event evaluated for this analysis assumes a land based threat that is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed.
2. Control Rod Drop Accident
  • The control rod drop event results in fuel damage and radioactivity that is retained within the turbine, condensers, and the offgas system. Release to the environment is due to leakage from the various contaminated systems into the turbine building. The FSAR does not contain detailed radiological conditions or release rates to determine an EAL classification. Since the shift staffing analysis is reviewing tasks for the ERO augmentation period, this review starts at an assumed ALERT declared on Turbine Building Vent radiation levels.
3. Loss of Coolant Accident
  • The event results in a release of radioactive material from the reactor coolant system to the primary containment from a complete circumferential break of one of the recirculation loop lines. This accident is established as the Design Basis of Loss of Coolant Accidents.

Page 9 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Fuel Handling Accident (FHA)
  • The FHA is assumed to occur when the primary containment is open and the reactor vessel head has been removed. The OBA for this case involves the dropping of a fuel bundle on top of the core. The FSAR does not contain detailed radiological conditions or release rates to determine an EAL classification. This analysis assumed an ALERT declaration based on Refuel Floor Vent Duct Radiation Monitor level.
5. Main Steam Line Break Accident
  • This event results in radioactive material releases outside secondary containment and was due to a complete severance of a 16" line leading to the turbine bypass steam chest.

The FSAR does not provide adequate guidance to determine the EAL expected for this event. For the purpose of this analysis, an Alert level classification on EAL was assumed.

6. Aircraft Probable Threat (50.54hh)
  • Notification is received from the NRC that a probable aircraft threat exists (>5 minutes,

<30 minutes).

7. Fire requiring evacuation of the Control Room and plant shutdown from remote location, (Appendix R Fire)
  • A fire occurs in the main control room requiring the evacuation of the control room and procedures implemented to remotely shutdown the reactor.
8. Station Blackout
  • A loss of all offsite AC power occurs and the failure of the emergency diesel generators to start. The SM determines power cannot be restored and declares a SAE due to the loss of off-site power.
9. General Emergency (GE) with radioactive release and PAR
  • This event is based on the same initial conditions of the LOCA but assumes system failures meet the GE conditions of a loss of 2 fission product boundaries with the potential loss of the third.

C. Accident Scenarios not included in the Analysis

1. Appendix R Fire That Results in a Reactor Trip
  • The team concluded the Control Room fire to be the most limiting for resources and therefore a staffing analysis for an additional fire scenario is not required. The emergency plan and fire brigade responsibilities are the same for both events.
2. General Emergency with entry into Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMG).
  • This event assumes an accident occurs and adequate core cooling cannot be maintained, requiring entry into SAMGs. Reactor level is assumed to be below the top of active fuel but is above the bottom of active fuel. A review of the SAMGs associated with the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Actions concluded that no actions would require on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators. No analysis required.

Page 10 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS A. Notes and Assumptions applicable to all accidents in JAF Staffing Analysis:

1. The RP and Chemistry tasks reviewed were those directed by the Shift Manager to support actions in Abnormal Operating Procedures (AOP), Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP),

Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EAP), and Emergency Plan Implementation Checklists (IAP). Any additional tasks directed by the Technical Support Center (TSC),

Operations Support Center (OSC), or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) procedures were not reviewed.

2. JAF has 60 minute emergency responders when augmented while the ERO is offsite. This analysis was conducted assuming a 90 minute response of the augmented ERO to allow the use of this analysis for a possible future extension in ERO augmentation times. The only specific emergency response task assigned to the augmented ERO prior to a 90 minute response is the activation of EROS by the on-call IT staff member. The task of EROS activation by the SM was also analyzed to ensure the task could be assigned without impacting the SMs ability to perform the SMs primary emergency functions and tasks.
3. The OSA team determined there are no time critical RP or Chemistry tasks and that task performance is directed and prioritized by the Shift Manager. The time RP or Chemistry is directed to perform a task and the amount of time taken to complete tasks are estimated. No Chemistry samples are required by Tech Specs within the 90 minute period after a declaration.

Since the Shift Manager directs when the tasks are performed, there are no overlapping RP or chemistry tasks.

B. NEI 10-05 Rev O Assumptions

1. Response time used for this analysis was the maximum acceptable number of minutes elapsed between emergency declaration and the augmented ERO position holder at a location necessary to relieve an on-shift position of the emergency response task. As noted above, this analysis assumed a 90 minute augmentation time although the times noted in the Table 1 accident analysis tables reflects the E-plan required staffing times of 60 minutes.
2. On-shift personnel complement was limited to the minimum required number and composition as described in the site emergency plan. If the plan commitments allow for different minimum staffing levels (e.g., a variance between a normal dayshift and a backshift), the staffing with the smallest total number of personnel was used for the analysis.
3. Although the temporary absence of a position may be allowed by Tech Specs, the analysis was performed assuming that all required on-shift positions are filled.
4. Each analyzed event occurred during off-normal work hours where the ERO was offsite and all required minimum on-shift positions were filled.
5. On-shift personnel reported to their assigned response locations within timeframes sufficient to allow for performance of assigned actions.

Page 11 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

6. On-shift staff had necessary Radiation Worker qualification to obtain normal dosimetry and enter the radiological control area (RCA) (but not locked high or very high radiation areas) without the aid of an RP technician. *
7. Personnel assigned plant operations and SSD met the requirements and guidance (analyzed through other programs such as operator training) and were not evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
8. In-plant (manual) safety related operator actions to manipulate components and equipment from locations outside the control room to achieve and maintain safe shutdown was done by a member of the on-shift staff as defined in the unit's Tech Specs.
9. Fire brigade (FB) staff performance is analyzed through other station programs (e.g., fire drills) and was not evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
10. Individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.
11. Security was not evaluated unless a role or function from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
12. Communications, briefings, and peer checks are acceptable collateral duties.
13. All on-shift staff positions were evaluated, even if they had no known collateral duties, to ensure they can perform the tasks assigned to them. [Ref NSIR/DPR-ISG-01]
14. The Staffing Analysis specified the resources available to perform "Repair and Corrective Actions" and "Rescue Operations and First Aid" but these may be assigned as collateral duty to a designated on-shift responder.
15. For assessment purposes, NRC notifications were treated as a continuous action per 10CFR50.72(c)(3) and 73.71(b)(1). This means once the initial NRC communications are established, the NRC will request an open line be maintained with the NRC Operations Center.
16. DBA (postulated accident, Condition IV event, or limiting fault) is considered as "Unanticipated occurrences that are postulated for accident analysis purposes but not expected to occur during the life of the plant. A postulated accident could result in sufficient damage to preclude resumption of plant operation. As a result, a greater number and variety of actions would need to be implemented by plant personnel."
17. Unless otherwise specified in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, or by the USAR initial conditions of a DBA analysis, it was assumed that the unit was in Mode 1, Power.
18. DST assumed a hostile force breached the protected area fence but was neutralized with no adverse consequences to plant safety. Damage inflicted on plant systems, structures and components was not sufficient to prevent safe shutdown or cause a radiological release. There was no fire significant enough to warrant firefighting efforts prior to arrival of offsite resources and/or the augmented ERO.

Page 12 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

19. The Staffing Analysis used OBA analysis assumptions, inputs, timing of events, plant protective response, and specified manual operator actions and their timing, as documented in the FSAR.
20. In cases where a OBA analysis included a radiological release, and the starting point of the release was not clearly defined, the staffing analysis assumed that the release began 15-minutes after the initiating event.
21. Severe Accident Management Guideline (SAMG) - this analysis assumed the accident progressed to conditions requiring a severe accident response; it did not include determining specific failures and the accident sequence.
22. SAMG - The actions analyzed included those that implement the initial site-specific actions assuming the core is not ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure), and there is no actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.

Page 13 of 74 I .

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis VI. APPENDIX A - ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS Summary Event Plant Reference Analysis Event Type Description of 1 Event ECL

  1. Mode Document(s) Required?

Event 1 DBT Land and/or 1 NEI 10-05 Site Area Yes waterborne Emergency HOSTILE ACTION directed against the Protected Area by a HOSTILE FORCE.

Assume adversary characteristics defined by the Design Basis Threat (DBT).

2 OBA Control Rod Drop 1 FSAR 14.6.1.2 Alert Yes Accident 3 OBA Loss of Coolant 1 FSAR 14.6.1.3 Site Area Yes Accident Emergency 4 OBA Fuel Handling 5 FSAR 14.6.1.4 Alert Yes Accident 5 OBA Main Steam Line 1 FSAR 14.6.1.5 Alert Yes Break outside secondary containment 6 Assumed Aircraft Probable 1 10CFR50.54hh(1) Alert Yes for analysis Threat purpose RG 1.214 7 Assumed Control Room 1 10CFR50 Alert Yes for Analysis Evacuation and Appendix R Purpose Remote Shutdown (fire in main control Procedure AOP-room) 43 8 Assumed Station Blackout 1 10CFR50.63 Site Area Yes for analysis Emergency purpose 9 Assumed LOCA - General 1 ISG IV.C General Yes for Analysis Emergency with Emergency Purpose radiological release and PAR 10 Assumed Appendix R Fire 1 ISG IV.C Alert No" for Analysis Purpose 11 Assumed LOCA - General 1 ISG IV.C General No~

for Analysis Emergency and Emergency Purpose entry into severe accident procedures.

Page 14 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis 1

Plant mode per FSAR or assumed for analysis purpose 2

Appendix R Fire is bound by the Control Room Fire and Remote Shutdown.

3 JAF does not meet the NEI 10-05 intent for the analysis of implementing SAMG. NEI 10-05 Section 2.11 states that the analysis of the ability to implement SAMG focuses on the reasonably expected initial mitigation action that would be performed by on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators. The actions taken by on-shift personnel to mitigate an event at JAF are performed by licensed and non-licensed operators.

Page 15 of 74

1 I

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis VII. APPENDIX B - ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS A. Accident Analysis #1 - Design Basis Threat (DBT)

1. Accident Summary
  • Land and/or waterborne HOSTILE ACTION directed against the Protected Area by a HOSTILE FORCE. Assume adversary characteristics defined by the Design Basis Threat.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed.
  • Assume at power in Mode 1
  • Security notifies the Shift Manager of condition of hostile action occurring within the protected area (Security code RED)
  • Assume all non-security staff is located inside the protected area at their normal work station when the event occurs.
  • Assume all systems function and the core remains covered. No fuel damage and no release.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • AOP -70, Security Threat
  • AOP-1, Reactor Scram (if shutdown due to the event)
  • EOP - 2, RPV Control (if shutdown due to the event)
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergency Conditions
  • EAP- 1, Offsite Notifications
  • EAP-8, Personnel Accountability
  • EAP-10, Protected area evacuation Page 16 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis # 1 Ca! ~~!;cLICib£ !bC~iilt Augmentation Role in Line Unanalyzed TMS Table#/
  1. On-shift Position Basis Document Elapsed Time Task? Required?

(min)* Line#

T2/L 1 T2/L3 T5/L 1 T5/L3 Shift Manager I Emergency Plan T5/L5 1 60 No No STA Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L7 T5/L8 T5/L 10 T5/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2 NIA T2/L2 No No Supervisor Table 5-1 Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2/L7 3 NIA No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 4 T2/L4 No No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5 N/A T2/L5 No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 6 N/A N/A No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 7 N/A T2/L6 No No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 8 No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator#4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 T5/L 13 No No Operator#5 Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A 12 Fire Brigade #5 No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 N/A No No Technician Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A 14 RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency Plan /

15 Security NIA T5/L 15 No No Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 17 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2-PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room ANALYSIS # 1 DBT Security Threat Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program CRS Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 7 Field Support Supervisor Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Task Analysis Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 18 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING ANALYSIS# 1 DBT Security Threat Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1

N/A N/A 2

N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4

NIA N/A 5

N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 19 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis # 1 DBT Security Threat L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)

I Function / Task N 0-5 5-10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 E 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey: N/A 2 On-site Survey: N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring: NIA 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad

~ssessment: N/A 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe)

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)

N/A No chemistry or RP job function tasks for the conditions described in the DBT assumptions. RP and Chemistry take cover as directed.

Page 20 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5- EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis# 1 tUU ~~~a1cilx Ibc~al Function / Task On-Shift Task Analysis Controlling Method Line#

Position Declare the emergency classification level Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) Manager Program I EP Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Emergency Planning Training 3

Manager Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program I Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., Shift 5 to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Emergency Planning Training Program Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program Shift 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event Licensed Operator Training Program Manager Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Perform State/local notifications Emergency Planning Training 9 NP0#5 Program Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager Activate EROS Emergency Planning Training 11 (Note 1)

Program 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications NP0#5 Program Perform other site-specific event notifications Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager 15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training Program I EP Drills Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 21 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #2 - Control Rod Drop Accident

1. Accident Summary
  • The control rod drop accident (CRDA) results in fuel damage and radioactivity that is retained within the turbine, condensers, and the offgas system. Release to the environment is due to leakage from the various contaminated systems into the turbine building. The FSAR does not contain detailed radiological conditions or release rates to determine an EAL classification. Since the shift staffing analysis is reviewing tasks for the ERO augmentation period, this review starts at an assumed ALERT based on Turbine Building Vent radiation levels.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • As a result of elimination of the MS IV-closure and reactor-shutdown functions of the main steam line radiation monitors, the MSIVs stay open and the release is to the condenser and offgas system.
  • The released radioactivity is retained within the turbine, condensers and the offgas system. Release to the environs is due to leakage from the various contaminated systems into the turbine building.
  • The leakage rate from contaminated systems into the turbine building amounts to 1% per day and lasts for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The release to the atmosphere is at ground level and there is no holdup or mixing within the turbine building.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • EAP-1, Offsite Notification
  • . EAP-4 Dose Assessment Calculations
  • EAP-5.3, Onsite/Offsite Downwind Surveys and Environmental Monitoring
  • EAP-17, Emergency Organizatfon Staffing
  • EOP - 2, RPV Control (Low power so probably no entry)
  • Coolant sample
  • AOP-15 Isolation Verification and Recovery
  • AOP-32, Unexplained/ Unanticipated Reactivity Change
  • SP-01 :02, Chemistry Reactor Water Sampling & Analysis
  • CHS0-03, Chemistry Guidelines for Scram Page 22 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis 4 Tables JAF TABLE 1 -ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis # 2 ~gatcgl B12d t21lU2 a,,id~at Augmentation Role in Line Unanalyzed TMS On-shift Position Basis Document Elapsed Time Table #I

  1. Task? Required?

(minl* Line#

T2IL 1 T2IL3 TSIL 1 T5IL3 Shift Manager I Emergency Plan T5/L5 1 60 No No STA Table 5-1 T5/L6 TS/LB T5/L 10 T5/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2

Supervisor Table 5-1 NIA T2/L2 No No Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2IL7 3 NIA No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A No 4 T2IL4 No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A No 5 T2/L5 No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 6

Operator#3 Table 5-1 N/A NIA No No Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 7

Operator#1 NIA T2/L6 No No Table 5-1 8

Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan NIA NIA No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A NIA No 9 No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator#4 Table 5-1 NIA N/A No No 60 T5IL9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 T5/L 13 No No Operator#5 Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No 12 Fire Brigade #5 No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 T5/L 12 No No Technician Table 5-1 T4/L 1 Emergency Plan 14 RP Technician 60 T4/L2 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency Plan /

15 Security N/A T5/L 15 No No Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 23 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2 - PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room ANALYSIS # 2 Control Rod Drop Accident Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 24 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3 - FIREFIGHTING ANALYSIS # 2 Control Rod Drop Accident Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 25 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis # 2 Control Rod Drop Accident L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function / Task N 10 20 30 40 50- 55 65 75 85-0-5 5-10 E 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey:

RP#1 X X X X X 2 On-site Survey:

RP#1 X X X X X X X 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad

!Assessment:

Chemistry (Included in Table 5) 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) -

NIA 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe) -

N/A RP will perform the above task as directed by the Shift Manager. Tasks are not time critical.

The time* to commence and complete the tasks are estimated.

Page 26 of 74 J

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis # 2 Control Rod Drop Accident Line Function / Task On-Shift Position Task Analysis

  1. Controlling Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program I EP (ECL)

Drills

~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program I 5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program Licensed Operator 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Training Program Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NPO#S Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 11 ~ctivate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program Offsite radiological assessment Emergency Planning 12 RP/Chemistry Technician Training Program Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NPO#S Training Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training Program INPO, ANI, etc.)

Security Training Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security VEP Drills Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 27 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Loss of Coolant Accident

1. Accident Summary
  • This event results in a release of radioactive material from the reactor coolant system to the primary containment from a complete circumferential break of one of the recirculation loop lines with a concurrent loss of offsite power. This accident is established as the Design Basis of Loss of Coolant Accidents.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • .Leak isolation time assumed to be 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
  • .Assume release starts 15 minutes after the event.
  • Release pathways:

o Drywell leakage o MSIV leakage o ESF component leakage in secondary containment (reactor building) o All leakage to the environment is through SGT with assumed charcoal filter efficiency of 90% for all radionuclides, except noble gases.

o Leakage from the OW (includes MSIV leakage) is at the rate of 1.5% per day

3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • EAP-1, Offsite Notification
  • EAP-4 Dose Assessment Calculations
  • EOP 5/6 Secondary Containment/ Radiological Release
  • AOP-15, Isolation Verification and Recovery
  • AOPs - Loss of Offsite Power
  • EAP-5.3, Onsite/Offsite Downwind Surveys and Environmental Monitoring
  • CHS0-03, Chemistry Department Guidelines for Start-up, Shutdown, and Scram (if requested by SM, not required until 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> after transient)
  • SP-01.02, Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis (If sample is requested)

Page 28 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis 4 Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis # 3 Lg:a:z gf ~ggls1at ~,,itlca1 Augmentation Role in Line Unanalyzed TMS On-shift Position Basis Document Elapsed Time Table#/

  1. Task? Required?

(min)* Line#

T2/L 1 T2/L3 T5/L 1 T5/L3 Shift Manager/ Emergency Plan T5/L5 No 1 60 No STA Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L8 T5/L 10 T5/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2 N/A T2/L2 No No Supervisor Table 5-1 Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2/L7 3 N/A No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan No 4 N/A T2/L4 No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5 N/A T2/L5 No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 6 N/A No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A 7 T2/L6 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No 8 No Operator #2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator#4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 T5/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A 12 Fire Brigade #5 No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 T5/L 12 No No Technician Table 5-1 Emergency Plan T4/L2 14 RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency Plan /

15 Security N/A T5/L 15 No No Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 29 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2-PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room ANALYSIS # 3 Loss of Coolant Accident Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 30 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING ANALYSIS # 3 Loss of Coolant Accident Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 31 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis # 3 Loss of Coolant Accident L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function/ Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80- 85-0-5 5-10 E 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey: N/A 2 On-site Survey:

RP#1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:

(Included in Table 5) 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) -

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe) -

N/A Task is not time critical. The time* to perform the task and the time to complete the task is estimated.

Page 32 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis # 3 Loss of Coolant Accident Line Function / Task On-Shift Position Task Analysis

  1. Controlling Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program I EP (ECL)

Drills

!Approve Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 [Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program I 5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 Abbreviated NRG notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NP0#5 Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRG event notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 11 Activate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program Emergency Planning 12 Offsite radiological assessment RP/Chemistry Technician Training Program Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRG notifications NP0#5 Training Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training Program INPO, ANI, etc.)

Security Training Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security

/ EP Drills Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 33 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4 - Fuel Handling Accident

1. Accident Summary
  • The FHA is assumed to occur when the primary containment is open and the reactor vessel head has been removed. The OBA for this case involves the dropping of a fuel bundle on top of the core.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • The FSAR does not contain detailed radiological conditions or release rates to determine an EAL classification. This analysis, therefore, assumed an ALERT declaration based on Refuel Floor Vent Duct Radiation.
  • Additional station personnel, including Operations and Health Physics Technicians, would be on-site during refueling activities. Additional station personnel were not required, however, to support initial response actions.
  • JAF Technical Specifications Section 5.2.2. (f) requires an STA qualified individual be available to provide advisory technical support to the operations shift crew in modes 1,2, or 3. The Fuel Handling Accident is assumed to occur while in Mode 5, therefore the STA was not considered available for this accident.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • EAP-1, Offsite Notification
  • EAP-4 Dose Assessment Calculations
  • EAP-5.3, Onsite/Offsite Downwind Surveys and Environmental Monitoring
  • SP-01.02, Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis (If sample is requested)

Page 34 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis #4 - Fuel Handling Accident Augmentation Role in Table #

Line Unanalyzed TMS On-shift Position E-Plan Reference Elapsed Time /Line#

  1. Task? Required?

(min)

T2/L1 T5/L1 T5/L3 Emergency Plan TS/LS 1 Shift Manager 60 No No Table 5-1 T5/L6 TS/LB TS/L 10 TS/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2

Supervisor Table 5-1 N/A T2/L2 No No Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan N/A T2/L7 3 No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A No 4 T2/L4 No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5

Operator#2 Table 5-1 N/A T2/L5 No No Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A N/A 6 No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A 7 T2/L6 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No 8

Operator #2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator #4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 TS/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 12 Fire Brigade #5 Emergency Plan NIA N/A No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 TS/L 12 No No Technician Table 5-1 Emergency Plan T4/L2 14 RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency 15 Security Plan / Emergency N/A TS/L 15 No No Plan Table 5-1 Page 35 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2 - PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room ANALYSIS # 4 - Fuel Handling Accident Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program 3 Shift Technical Advisor N/A N/A Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A NIA 8 Electrician N/A NIA 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A NIA 11 Other N/A N/A Page 36 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING ANALYSIS# 4 - Fuel Handling Accident Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 NIA N/A This accident does not include the need for firef1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 37 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis #4 - Fuel Handling Accident L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function / Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80- 85-E 0-5 5-10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In- lant Survey:

~

2 On.ijite Survey:

X X X X X X X X X X X X X RP#1 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:

(Included in Table 5 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe)

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)

N/A The time* to commence and complete the task is estimated.

Page 38 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5-EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis #4 - Fuel Handling Accident Line Function / Task On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling

  1. Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program / EP (ECL)

Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action N/A 2 N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g.,

5 Shift Manager Program / Emergency to assemble, evacuate, etc.)

Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NPO#S Training Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning 11 Activate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program Emergency Planning 12 Offsite radiological assessment RP/Chemistry Technician Training Program Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NPO#S Training Program Perform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training 14 Shift Manager (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Officer Security Training Program Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 39 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Main Steam Line Break

1. Accident Summary
  • This event results in radioactive material releases outside secondary containment and was due to a complete severance of a 16" line leading to the turbine bypass steam chest.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • The FSAR does not provide adequate guidance to determine the EAL. It is assumed that the steam line break release for the 2 µCi/gm 1-131 DE would cause the following instruments to alarm: MSL radiation monitors, Off Gas radiation monitors, Turbine Building area monitors. For the purpose of this analysis, an Alert level classification on is assumed
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • EAP-1, Offsite Notification
  • EAP-4, Dose Assessment Calculations
  • EOP 5/6 Secondary Containment/ Radiological Release
  • EAP-6, In-Plant Emergency Surveys
  • EAP-5.3, Onsite/Offsite Downwind Surveys and Environmental Monitoring
  • CHS0-03, Chemistry Department Guidelines for Start-up, Shutdown, and Scram (if requested by SM, not required until 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> after transient)
  • SP-01.02, Reactor Water Sampling and Analysis (If sample is requested)

Page 40 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 -ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis # 5 - Main Steam Line Break Augmentation Role in Table #

On-shift Unanalyzed TMS Line# E-Plan Reference Elapsed Time /Line#

Position Task? Required?

(min)

T2/L 1 T2/L3 T5/L 1 T5/L3 Shift Manager/ Emergency Plan No 1 60 T5/L5 No STA Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L8 T5/L 10 T5/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2 N/A T2/L2 No No Supervisor Table 5-1 Field Support Emergency Plan N/A T2/L7 3 No No Supv. (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 4 T2/L4 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 5 T2/L5 No No Operator #2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A N/A No 6

Operator #3 Table 5-1 No Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A No 7 T2/L6 No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 8 No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator#4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 T5/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A 12 Fire Brigade #5 No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 T5/L 12 No No Technician Table 5-1 T4/L 1 Emergency Plan 14 RP Technician Table 5-1 60 T4/L2 No No Security Contingency 15 Security Plan / Emergency N/A T5/L 15 No No Plan Table 5-1 Page 41 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2 - PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room ANALYSIS # 5 - Main Steam Line Break Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 !Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A Page 42 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3 - FIREFIGHTING ANALYSIS # 5 - Main Steam Line Break Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 43 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis # 5 - Main Steam Line Break L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function/ Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0-5 5-10 E 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey:

RP#1 X X X X X 2 On-site Survey:

X X X X X X X RP#1 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment: (refer to Table 5) 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe)

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)

N/A Tasks are not time critical. The time* to commence and complete the tasks are estimated.

Page 44 of 74 L

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis # 5 - Main Steam Line Break Function / Task On-Shift Position Task Analysis Line#

Controllina Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program I EP (ECL)

Drills

~pprove Offsite Protective Action N/A 2 N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A. NIA Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program I 5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A NIA Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NP0#5 Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 11 Activate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program Emergency Planning 12 Offsite radiological assessment RP/Chemistry Technician Training Program Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NP0#5 Training Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training Program INPO, ANI, etc.)

Security Training Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Officer

/ EP Drills Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 45 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis F. Accident Analysis #6 -Aircraft Probable Threat

1. Accident Summary
  • The analysis includes all emergency response actions taken prior to an aircraft impact in accordance with RG 1.214 for an aircraft threat that is greater than 5 minutes, but less than 30 minutes from the site, and considers the dispersal of the site fire brigade away from target areas for firefighting.
  • The analysis does not include a scenario or response actions taken during or after a crash.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • The Shift Manager receives the call from the NRC of probable aircraft threat.
  • All non-security on-shift personnel are inside the protected area fence at their normal workstation.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • EOP -2, RPV Control (if shutdown due to the event)
  • EAP-8, Personnel Accountability
  • EAP-10, PA Evacuation Page 46 of 74 L ___

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis #6 - Aircraft Probable Threat Augmentation Role in Table Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Basis Document Elapsed Time # I Line# Task? Required?

(min)

T2/L1 T2/L3 TS/L 1 T5/L3 Emergency Plan 1 Shift Manager/ STA 60 TS/LS No No Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L8 TS/L 10 TS/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A No 2 T2/L2 No Supervisor Table 5-1 Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2/L7 3 N/A No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 4 T2/L4 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 5 T2/L5 No No Operator #2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 6

Table 5-1 NIA No No Operator #3 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A 7 T2/L6 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 8

Operator #2 Table 5-1 No No Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator #4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 TS/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A 12 Fire Brigade #5 No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan N/A 13 60 No No Technician Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A 14 RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency Plan 15 Security N/A TS/L 15 No No

/ Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 47 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2-PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room Analysis #6 - Aircraft Probable Threat Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 48 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING Analysis #6 - Aircraft Probable Threat Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for frref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 49 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis #6 - Aircraft Probable Threat L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I FuN/Anction / Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80- 85-0-5 5-10 E 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey: N/A 2 On-site Survey: N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:

/Included in Table 5

-NIA 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) -

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe) -

N/A

  • Times are estimated The RP Technician is available to perform Job Coverage for Fuel Pool Cooling and Reactor Water Clean-up isolations. The RP Technician will then relocate with survey vehicle to outside the protected area. No specific Chemistry tasks are performed for this event. The Chemistry Technician is available to support NRC communications if needed.

Page 50 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis #6 - Aircraft Probable Threat Line Function / Task* On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling

  1. Method Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning 1 Shift Manager (ECL) Training Program I EP Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action N/A 2 N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g.,

5 Shift Manager Program I Emergency to assemble, evacuate, etc.)

Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NPO#S Training Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning 11 Activate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NPO#S Training Program Perform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training 14 Shift Manager (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training Program Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 51 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis G. Accident Analysis #7 - Control Room Fire Requiring Evacuation and Remote Shutdown

1. Accident Summary
  • This event involves a large transient fire requiring evacuation of the Control Room. The event has the potential to include shorts and/or spurious signals producing potential LOCA pathways and/or incorrect system lineup for shutdown.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • The Senior Nuclear Operator will initiate a manual reactor trip prior to evacuating the control room.
  • The Shift Manager will make the plant announcement prior to evacuating the control room.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • AOP 43, Plant SD from Outside CR
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • EAP-1, Offsite Notification Page 52 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis #7 - CR Evacuation & Remote SD Augmentation Role in Table Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Basis Document Elapsed Time #/Line# Task? Required?

(min)

T2/L 1 T2/L3 T5/L 1 T5/L3 Emergency Plan 1 Shift Manager/ STA 60 T5/L5 No No Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L8 T5/L 10 T5/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2

Supervisor Table 5-1 N/A T2/L2 No No Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2/L7 3 N/A No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 4 N/A T2/L4 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5

Operator #2 Table 5-1 NIA T2/L5 No No Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 6 T3/L 1 No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 7 N/A T2/L6 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T3/L2 8 No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T3/L3 9 No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator #4 Table 5-1 N/A T3/L4 No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 T5/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 12 Fire Brigade #5 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L5 No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 N/A No No Technician Table 5-1 14 Emergency Plan N/A RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency Plan 15 Security I Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No Table 5-1 Page 53 of 74

l James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2 - PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room Analysis #7 - CR Evacuation & Remote SD Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 54 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3-FIREFIGHTING Analysis #7 - CR Evacuation & Remote SD Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 Senior Nuclear Operator #3 Fire Brigade Training Nuclear Plant Operator #2 2 Fire Brigade Training Nuclear Plant Operator #3 3 Fire Brigade Training Nuclear Plant Operator #4 4 Fire Brigade Training Fire Brigade #5 5 Fire Brigade Training Page 55 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4- RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis #7 - CR Evacuation & Remote SD L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function/ Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 E 0-5 5-10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey: N/A 2 On-site Survey: N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad

~ssessment:

(Included in Table 5 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) -

NIA 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe) -

N/A No spec1f1c RP or Chemistry related emergency tasks were identified for this event.

Page 56 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5- EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis #7 - CR Evacuation & Remote SD Line Function I Task* On-Shift Position Task Analysis

  1. Controlling Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program / EP (ECL)

Drills 2

Approve Offsite Protective Action N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program /

5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A 8 Complete State/local notification form Emergency Planning Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NP0#5 Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Training Program 11 Activate EROS Emergency Planning (Note 1)

Training Program 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NP0#5 Training Program Perform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator 14 Shift Manager (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Training Program 15 Personnel Accountability N/A N/A Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 57 of 74

  • * ~

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis H. Accident Analysis #8 - Station Blackout

1. Accident Summary
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • Assume all automatic actions occur
  • Assume RCIC is operable and equipment operated per the procedure perform as expected
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • AOP -49, Station Blackout (Rev 18)
  • AOP-1, Reactor Scram (if shutdown due to the event)
  • EOP - 2, RPV Control (if shutdown due to the event)
  • IAP-2, Classification (Rev. 30)
  • EAP-8, Personnel Accountability Page 58 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis #8 - Station Blackout Augmentation Role in Table Unanalyzed TMS Line Basis On-shift Position Elapsed Time # I Line# Task? Required?
  1. Document I

(min)

I T2/L1 T2/L3 TS/L 1 T5/L3 Shift Manager/ Emergency Plan 1 60 TS/LS No No STA Table 5-1 T5/L6 T5/L8 TS/L 10 TS/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A 2 T2/L2 No No Supervisor Table 5-1 Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan N/A T2/L7 3 No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 4 T2/L4 No No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5

Operator#2 Table 5-1 NIA T2/L5 No No Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 6 N/A NIA No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A 7 T2/L6 No No Operator#1 Table 5-1 8

Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No Operator#2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator#3 Table 5-1 10 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No Operator#4 Table 5-1 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 TS/L 13 No No Operator#S Table 5-1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A 12 Fire Brigade #5 No No Table 5-1 RP/ Chemistry Emergency Plan N/A 13 60 No No Technician Table 5-1 14 RP Technician Emergency Plan N/A No 60 No Table 5-1 Security Contingency 15 Security Plan/ N/A TS/L 15 No No Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 59 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2-PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room Analysis #8 - Station Blackout Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 60 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING Analysis #8 - Station Blackout Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 61 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis #8 - Station Blackout L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function / Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80- 85-E 0-5 5-10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey: N/A 2 On-site Survey: N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring: N/A 4 Job Coverage: N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:

(Included in Table 5 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) -

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe) -

N/A RP/Chemistry and RP Technician do not have any assigned emergency tasks for this event. RP/Chemistry Technician is available for dose assessment if a release occurs.

Page 62 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis #8 - Station Blackout Line Function/ Task* On-Shift Position Task Analysis

  1. Controlling Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program / EP (ECL)

Drills 2

~pprove Offsite Protective Action N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program /

5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DST event N/A N/A Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NP0#5 Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 11 Activate EROS (Note 1)

Training Program 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NP0#5 Training Program Perform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator 14 Shift Manager (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Training Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training Program Note 1: See Section V.A.2 Page 63 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis I. Accident Analysis #9 - LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR

1. Accident Summary (Assumed for Staffing Analysis Purpose)
  • The unit is in a Site Area Emergency when the Shift Manager is given a dose assessment update that projects >1 Rem TEDE dose at the site boundary.
2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
  • All actions for SAE are complete.

I

  • The ERO would be activated at an Alert or SAE. For Staffing Analysis purpose, the T=O clock is used for the emergency plan actions to evaluate the capability to implement the GE classification, PAR and notification functions before the ERO arrives.
3. Procedures for Accident Response
  • IAP-2, Classification of Emergencies
  • AOP-15, Isolation Verification and Recovery
  • EAP-5.3, Onsite/Offsite Downwind Surveys and Environmental Monitoring Page 64 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis

4. Tables JAF TABLE 1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Analysis #9 - LOCA/GE with PAR Augmentation Role in Table Unanalyzed TMS Required?

Line Basis On-shift Position Elapsed Time # I Line# Task?

  1. Document (min)

T2/L 1 T2/L3 TS/L 1 T5/L2 Shift Manager I Emergency Plan T5/L3 1 60 No No STA Table 5-1 T5/L4 TS/LS TS/LB TS/L 10 TS/L 14 Control Room Emergency Plan 2

Supervisor Table 5-1 N/A T2/L2 No No Field Support Supv. Emergency Plan T2/L7 3 N/A No No (FSS) Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 4 N/A T2/L4 No No Operator#1 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan 5 N/A T2/L5 No No Operator #2 Table 5-1 Senior Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A 6

Operator #3 Table 5-1 N/A No No Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 7 N/A T2/L6 No No Operator #1 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 8 No No Operator #2 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A 9 No No Operator #3 Table 5-1 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 10 Operator #4 Table 5-1 N/A N/A No No 60 T5/L9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 11 TS/L 13 No No Operator #5 Table 5-1 12 Fire Brigade #5 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No Table 5-1 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 13 60 T5/L 12 No No Technician Table 5-1 Emergency Plan T4/L4 14 RP Technician 60 No No Table 5-1 Security Contingency 15 Security Plan/ N/A T5/L 15 No No Emergency Plan Table 5-1 Page 65 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 2-PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN One Unit - One Control Room Analysis #9- LOCA/GE with PAR Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator 1 Shift Manager Training Program CRS Licensed Operator 2 Unit Supervisor Training Program Shift Manager Licensed Operator 3 Shift Technical Advisor Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 4 Reactor Operator #1

  1. 1 Training Program Senior Nuclear Operator Licensed Operator 5 Reactor Operator #2
  1. 2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1
  1. 1 Training Program Field Support Supervisor Licensed Operator 7 Field Support Supervisor Training Program Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling Method 7 Mechanic N/A N/A 8 Electrician N/A N/A 9 l&C Technician N/A N/A 10 Other N/A N/A 11 Other N/A N/A Page 66 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Fire Brigade JAF TABLE 3- FIREFIGHTING Analysis #9 - LOCA/GE with PAR Line Performed by Task Analysis Controlling Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A This accident does not include the need for f1ref1ghtmg, first aid or search & rescue.

Page 67 of 74 L__

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 4 - RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY Analysis #9 - LOCA/GE with PAR L Position Performing Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*

I Function / Task N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80- 85-E 0-5 5-10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 In-Plant Survey:

RP#1 2 On-site Survey:

RP#2 3 Personnel Monitoring:

4 Job Coverage: RP#1 support (including in plant and out of plant X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X surveys) as directed by the SM.

5 Offsite Rad

~ssessment: See Table 5 6 Other site specific RP (describe): N/A 7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe)

N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)

N/A RP Technician will perform the above task as directed by the Shift Manager. Tasks are not time critical. The time*

to commence and complete the tasks are estimated.

RP/Chemistry Technician does not have an assigned chemistry task for LOCA. Chemistry is available for dose assessment.

Page 68 of 74 J

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis JAF TABLE 5 - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Analysis #9- LOCA/GE with PAR Line Function / Task* On-Shift Position Task Analysis

  1. Controlling Method Emergency Planning Declare the emergency classification level 1 Shift Manager Training Program / EP (ECL)

Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action Emergency Planning 2 Shift Manager Recommendations Training Program Emergency Planning 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 4 Approve extension to allowable dose Shift Manager Training Program Licensed Operator Notification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program /

5 Shift Manager (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Emergency Planning Training Program Emergency Planning 6 ERO notification N/A Training Program Licensed Operator 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Training Program Emergency Planning 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 9 Perform State/local notifications NP0#5 Training Program Licensed Operator 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager Training Program Emergency Planning 11 ~ctivate ERDS N/A Training Program Emergency Planning 12 Offsite radiological assessment RP/Chemistry Technician Training Program Emergency Planning 13 Perform NRC notifications NP0#5 Training Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training Program INPO, ANI, etc.)

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training Program Page 69 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis VIII. APPENDIX C - TIME MOTION STUDIES SUPPORTING THE STAFFING ANALYSIS A. RP/Chemistry performance of dose assessment

1. See Section 11.C.1 for the exception taken for the RP/Chemistry Technician to perform dose assessment. No Time Motion Study or corrective action required Page 70 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis B. ERO Notification (Everbridge Activation)

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK TIME MOTION STUDY OF OVERLAPPING TASKS TASK 1: ACTIVATE THE ERO USING EVERBRIDGE JOB:

SHIFT MANAGER TASK 2: EMERGENCY DIRECTION AND CONTROL JOB: SHIFT MANAGER Page 71 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis PURPOSE:

Perform a Time Motion Study to evaluate whether assigning the performance of ERO notification using Everbridge to the Shift Manager or STA can be justified as an acceptable overlap to the Shift Manager's primary emergency plan function of direction and control.

NOTE The Time Motion Study may be completed during simulator training/evaluation or during EP drills LOCATION:

Simulator (to use the "TRAINING" event code to avoid inadvertent ERO activation for an EMERGENCY event.)

Codes are site specific.

REQUIRED TOOLS/EQUIPMENT:

A. Individual performing the procedure actions must be logged on to the computer being used.

B. PC with Internet 7.0 and internet access.

C. Instructions/codes for activating Everbridge in the TRAINING mode. [Staged Instruction sheet for activating Everbridge may be used in lieu of EN-EP-310, Emergency Response Organization Notification System)]

Page 72 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Function / Responsibility (Task) Analysis Template Event: ALL Site: JAF Position: Shift Manager Line #: 1 Function Responsibility (Task) Action Step Duration 1.Notification 1.1 Initiate notification to Retrieve the Everbridge instruction that contains the [TRAINING] Access code 15 seconds the ERO via the ERON and Pass code.

Program

1. (On the PC) Open ERO Notification System by clicking: 49 seconds Start-->Nuclear Corporate Apps (ESM)--> Nuclear Emergency Response (ESM) --> ERON
2. Enter Access code (XXXXX) and Pass code (XXXXX) and click the SUBMIT 17 seconds button
3. Select the appropriate classification by clicking on it. 34 seconds (step 3-9)

(Select ALERT or scenario ECL)

4. Answer "Yes" or "No" to Security EAL question, 'Was the event declared on a Security EAL?" [ Click on "NO"]

5.Select proper response action by clicking on it.

[Select "Activate All ERFs"}

6.Review the message that was generated in the User Message box at the bottom of the screen. Ensure the message contains the information to communicate to the ERO. Additional information can be added to the message by clicking in the User Message box and typing.

7 .Once satisfied with the message content, click send notification button. [Click "Send Notification"]

a.Answer YES" to send verification question, "Are you CERTAIN you want to send this message?" [Click "YES"]

9.lf message was successfully sent, you will see a dialog box. [Click "Return"]

END OF INITIATE NOTIFICATION TO ERO TASK 2.Emergency 2.1 Maintain emergency Oversight of the emergency response. Maintained throughout Direction and direction and control of the Control event response.

Initiate any emergency actions. Maintained throughout END OF EMERGENCY DIRECTION AND CONTROL TASK Task Performer: John Walkowiak Position: Shift Manager Date: 11 /8/12 Name Job Title Evaluator: Pete Cullinan Position: Sr. Emergency Planner Date: 11/8/12 Name Job Title Page 73 of 74

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant EP-AA-1014 Addendum 1 Rev 0 On-Shift Staffing Analysis IX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures NONE X. REFERENCES

  • NEI 10-05, Rev 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities
  • NSIR DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants
  • NUREG-0654, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants.
  • NRC Generic Letter No. 86-04, "Policy Statement of Engineering Expertise on Shift" XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM
  • Fred Guynn, Entergy ECH Project Manager, EP
  • Myra Jones, Contractor CMCG
  • Fran, Lukaczyk, Asst. Operations Manager
  • Fred Catella, Training Instructor
  • William Creego, Training Instructor
  • Mark Riffle, Chemistry Specialist
  • Mike Slocum, Chief Journeyman Chemistry
  • Bernie Landers, Chemistry Supv.
  • Adam King, Radiation Protection Supv.
  • Ron Owen, Security Supv.

Cover Page User: na532 Document: 0900e54e824154d6pdf Server: PRT17359C Time: 03/30/2018 15:53:43 Selected Page Range: All Status: OK Notes 1:

Notes 2:

Instructions:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18128A084&oldid=2406050"