IR 05000247/2014301: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511 | Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511 | ||
-0249 | -0249 SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20 143 0 1 | ||
SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20 143 0 1 | |||
==Dear Mr. Ventosa:== | ==Dear Mr. Ventosa:== | ||
Line 48: | Line 46: | ||
Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511 | Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511 | ||
-0249 | -0249 SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20143 0 1 Dear M : | ||
SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20143 0 1 Dear M : | |||
On February 1 9, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Indian Point , Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 10, 2014, with Mr. Frank Inzirillo, and other members of your staff. | On February 1 9, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Indian Point , Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 10, 2014, with Mr. Frank Inzirillo, and other members of your staff. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 18 May 2019
ML14091A692 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/31/2014 |
From: | Jackson D E Operations Branch I |
To: | Ventosa J A Entergy Nuclear Operations |
Shared Package | |
ML13252A147 | List: |
References | |
ER-14-301 | |
Preceding documents: |
|
Download: ML14091A692 (10) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406
-2713 March 31, 2014 Mr. John Ventosa, Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511
-0249 SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20 143 0 1
Dear Mr. Ventosa:
On February 1 9, 20 1 4, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Indian Poin t , Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 10, 20 1 4, with Mr. Frank Inzirillo, and other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicant s for reactor operator license s , seven applicant s for instant senior operator license s , and two applicant s for upgrade senior operator license s. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG
-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The license examiners determined that nine of the eleven applicant s satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate license s were issued on March 10, 2014. No findings were identified during this examination.
One applicant for an instant senior reactor operator failed the operating portion of the exam and was denied a license. Another senior reactor operator applicant will be issued his license upon notification by you of completion of his eligibility requirements. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams/web
-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.: 05000247 License No.: DPR
-26 Enclosure:
NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000 247/20 14 30 1 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
Mr. John Ventosa, Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511
-0249 SUBJECT: INDIAN POINT , UNIT 2 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 247/20143 0 1 Dear M :
On February 1 9, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Indian Point , Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on March 10, 2014, with Mr. Frank Inzirillo, and other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses, seven applicants for instant senior operator licenses
, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG
-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The license examiners determined that nine of the eleven applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on March 10, 2014.
No findings were identified during this examination.
One applicant for an instant senior reactor operator failed the operating portion of the exam and was denied a license. Another senior reactor operator applicant will be issued his license upon notification by you of completion of his eligibility requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams/web
-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/ Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Distribution: See Next Page DOCUMENT NAME
- G:\DRS\Operations Branch
\SILK\Exam FY14-IP2 Feb 10 (U01890)
\EXAM REPORT.docx ADAMS PKG: ML13252A147 ADAMS ACCESSION NO.
- ML14091A692 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRS NAME DSilk DJackson DATE 3/27/14 3/31/14 OFFICIAL RECORD CO PY Distribution w/encl
- (via E-mail) W. Dean, RA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE)
D. Lew, DRA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE)
M. Scott, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE)
E. Benner, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE)
R. Lorson, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE)
J. Trapp, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE) A. Burritt, DRP T. Setzer, DRP L. McKown, DRP J. Petch, DRP S. Stewart, DRP, SRI Ami Patel, DRP, RI G. Newman, DRP, RI D. Hochmuth, DRP, AA D. Silk, Chief Examiner, DRS D. Jackson, DRS DRS Master Exam File (C. Bixler) (w/concurrences)
E. Quinones, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1
-1 Resource ROPReports Resources
i Enclosure EXAMINATION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket: 50-247 License: DPR-26 Report : 05000 247/20 14 3 0 1 Licensee: Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc.
Facility: Indian Point, Unit 2 Location: 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan , NY 10511-0249 Dates: February 10
-18, 2014 (Operating Test Administration)
February 19, 2014 (Written Examination Administration)
February 26, 2014 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package
) March 5, 2014 (NRC Examination Grading)
March 10, 2014 (Licenses Issued)
Examiners: J. Tomlinson, Chief Examiner Under Instruction, Operations Branch D. Silk, Senior Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer M. Patel, Operations Engineer Approved By:
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
ii Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ER 05000 247/201 4 30 1; 2/10/2014
- 2/1 9/2014; Indian Point, Units 2; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report
.
Four NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicant s for reactor operator license s , seven applicant s for instant senior operator license s and two applicant s for upgrade senior operator license s at Indian Point, Unit 2. The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9 , Supplement 1. The written examination was administered by the facility on February 19, 2014. NRC examiner s administered the operating tests on February 10
-18 , 201 4. The NRC examiner s determined that nine of the 11 applicant s satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
No findings were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
.1 License Applications
a. Scope
The examiners reviewed all of the license applications submitted by the licensee to ensure the applications reflected that each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, "Persona l Qualification Statement," and NRC Form 396, "Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee." The examiner s audited the applicants' eligibility and experience which includ ed control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance
a. Examination Scope
On February 19, 2014 , the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all 11 applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on February 26, 2014
.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to all 11 applicants on February 10
-18 , 2014. The two applicants for reactor operator licenses participated in two dynamic simulator scenarios, in a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four administrative tasks. The seven applicants seeking an instant senior operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenario s, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks. The two applicants for upgrade senior operator license s participated in one dynamic simulator scenario, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of five system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks.
b. Findings
Ten of the applicants passed all parts of the operating test. One instant senior reactor operator applicant failed the administrative part of the operating test.
All 11 applicants passed the written examination. For the written examinations, the reactor operator applicants' average score was 82.66 percent and ranged from 80.0 to 85.33 percent, the senior operator applicants' average score was 88.0 percent and ranged from 81 to 96 percent. The overall written examination average was 87.0 percent.
The NRC examiners completed the final grading of the written examination on March 5 , 2014, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions.
In accordance with current NRC policy
, the release of this written examination will be delayed for 2 years. The text of the examination questions and the licensee's post
-examination comments may be accessed in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under the accession numbers noted in
1. Chapter ES
-403 and Form ES 1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner.
The licensee submitted two post-examination questions comments on February 26, 2014. The NRC reviewed the facility's post
-exam comment submittal package and accepted the facility recommendations regarding these two question s. The key answer was changed on Question 15 from "C" to "A" or "C" and changed on Question 21 from "A" to "A" or "B." The text of the examination questions, the licensee's examination analysis, and the licensee's post
-examination comments and technical references may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the
1.
.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development
a. Examination Scope
The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG
-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The facility licensee submitted both the written and operating examination outlines on November 18 , 201 3. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG
-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on December 18 , 2 01 3. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG
-1021, and provided final comments to the licensee on the examination on February 4, 2014. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of January 13, 2014. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution on February 10, 2014.
b. Findings
The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.
The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
No findings were identified.
.4 Simulation Facility Performance
a. Examination Scope
The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.5 Examination Security
a. Examination Scope
The examiners reviewed examination security for examination development and during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG
-1021 requirements. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
The chief examiner presented the examination results to Mr. Frank Inzirillo, Training Manager , and other members of the licensee's management staff on March 10, 2014. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.
s: Supplemental Information ATTACHMENT 1
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- S. Davis, Superintendent Operations Training
- F. Inzirillo, Training Manager
- T. Jenkins, Senior Staff Operations Instructor
- C. Ko csis, Senior Staff Operations Instructor
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened
NONE
Closed
- NONE
Discussed
NONE
ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED
Accession No. ML14080A507 -
- FINAL-Written Exam (Note:
- In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for 2
years.) Accession No. ML14080A508 -
- FINAL-Operating Exam Accession No. ML14085A415 -
- FINAL-Post Exam Comments and Technical References