ML14111A376

Miscellaneous Exam Materials (Folder 1)

ML14111A376
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	02/19/2014
From:	David Silk Operations Branch I
To:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
Jackson D
Shared Package
ML13252A147	List: IR 05000247/2014301 ML14043A526 ML14080A500 ML14080A501 ML14080A502 ML14080A503 ML14080A504 ML14080A506 ML14080A507 ML14080A508 ML14091A692 ML14111A374 ML14111A375 ML14111A376
References
TAC U01890
Download: ML14111A376 (2)

Text

IPEC Unit 2 2014 Written Exam Analysis Page 1 of2 Numb Description of Question Conclusions 6 This question was missed by 7 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The com;ept is included in the training This question asks the long term material.

system lineup if RHR is lost during The canelidates did not recognize the long time RCS vacuum refill. period at1d 1the lineup that would exist after 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

This que stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl ter action is necessary.

13 This question was missed by 5 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The con';ept is included in the training This question addresses the normal material.

lineup ofPORV Block valves (Closed) All5 of the applicants selected the same and the impact of a loss of power to incorrec1:answer. The answer selected was the Block Valve incorrect because it was not procedurally directed.

This que stion was reviewed with all applican ts.

No furtl1er action is necessary.

28 This question was missed by 5 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. This con cept is included in the training This question evaluates RCP materiaL conditions and determines actions This candidates did not recognize that the based on those conditions. actions f or a# 1 RCP seal failure with low flow are the same as a failure with high flow.

This que: stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl1er action is necessary 32 This question was missed by 8 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. This concept is included in the training This question evaluates what could be materiaL the cause ofleakage into the PRT. The can'iidates misunderstood the status of RHR vallves during testing.

This que: stion was reviewed with all applican ts.

No furtlter* action is necessary 48 This question was missed by 5 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. This conlCept is included in the training This question tests a requirement to material.

have MTG voltage above system This is a note in the procedure that some voltage when synchronizing. candidat es did not remember when answering the ques tion.

This que: stion was reviewed with all applican ts.

No furtlter* action is necessary

IPEC Unit 2 2014 Written Exam Analysis Page 2 of2 58 This question was missed by 5 of 11 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The cone ept is included in the training This question tests knowledge of Tech material.

Spec associated with misaligned rods. This que stion is challenging in a closed book format.

This que stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl ter action is necessary 82 This question was missed by 6 of 9 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The con<~ept is included in the training This question tests requirements for material.

SG Tube Leak after taking unit off There an~ subtle differences between the line. actions t;:~.kt:::n for a leak when compared to a rupture.

This que stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl ter action is necessary 88 This question was missed by 7 of 9 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The canelidates were confused as to when the This question tests knowledge of 480V bu s LCO applies.

electrical Tech Specs. This que stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl ter action is necessary 91 This question was missed by 7 of 9 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. The con<~ept is included in the training This question tests knowledge of the material.

refueling gripper interlocks and actions The canelidates were confused by terminology for a dropped fuel assembly that does for refue ling equipment.

not cause fuel damage. This que stion was reviewed with all applicants.

No furtl ter action is necessary 99 This question was missed by 9 of 9 There is no problem with this question.

applicants. Howeve1r, it may be too challenging without This question tests knowledge of EALs the EAL chart.

for loss of annunciators. The con<~ept is included in the training material.

No furtl ter action is necessary 100 This question was missed by 5 of 9 There is no problem with question.

applicants. The con<~ept is included in the training This question tests knowledge of material.

expected alarms during transfer to hot The canelidates were unsure of what procedure leg recirculation and procedural to transit ion to.

transition after this activity. No furtl ter action is necessary