ML14121A179: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| project = TAC:MF0481, TAC:MF0482
| project = TAC:MF0481, TAC:MF0482
| stage = Approval
| stage = Withholding Request Acceptance
}}
}}


Line 35: Line 35:
Non-proprietary copies of these documents have been placed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) library (Package Accession No. ML14058A131).  
Non-proprietary copies of these documents have been placed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) library (Package Accession No. ML14058A131).  


The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:  
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.  
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:    (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of 3 CA W-14-3884 Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.  
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:    (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of 3 CA W-14-3884 Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.  
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.  
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.  


(iii) There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:  
(iii) There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:  


(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a  
(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a  


competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position. (b) It is information that is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.  
competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position. (b) It is information that is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.  (d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire com ponents of proprietary information, anyone component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage. (e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.  
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.  (d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire com ponents of proprietary information, anyone component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage. (e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.
(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.  
(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.
(iv) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.  
(iv) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.  


(v) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.  
(v) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.  


    (vi) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is contained in LTR-RIDA-13-172, Revision 1, Attachment 1 "Final Response to U.S. NRC  
(vi) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is contained in LTR-RIDA-13-172, Revision 1, Attachment 1 "Final Response to U.S. NRC  


RAI B.1.34-8 on the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Reactor Lower Radial Support Clevis Insert Bolts" (Proprietary), for submittal to the Commission, being transmitted by Tennessee Valley Authority letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk. The proprietary information as submitted by Westinghouse is that associated with Unites States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Letter, "Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (T AC NOS. MF0481 and MF0482) - SET 14," MLl4263A338, September 26,2013, and may be used only for that purpose.  (a) This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to: (i) Support reactor vessel internals aging management. (b) Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows: (i) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for the purpose of supporting reactor internals aging management relative to lower radial support operational justification with degraded clevis insert cap screws.  
RAI B.1.34-8 on the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Reactor Lower Radial Support Clevis Insert Bolts" (Proprietary), for submittal to the Commission, being transmitted by Tennessee Valley Authority letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk. The proprietary information as submitted by Westinghouse is that associated with Unites States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Letter, "Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (T AC NOS. MF0481 and MF0482) - SET 14," MLl4263A338, September 26,2013, and may be used only for that purpose.  (a) This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to: (i) Support reactor vessel internals aging management. (b) Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows: (i) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for the purpose of supporting reactor internals aging management relative to lower radial support operational justification with degraded clevis insert cap screws.
(ii) The information requested to be withheld reveals the distinguishing aspects of a methodology which was developed by Westinghouse. Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar technical evaluation justifications and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.
(ii) The information requested to be withheld reveals the distinguishing aspects of a methodology which was developed by Westinghouse. Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar technical evaluation justifications and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.
The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.  
The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.  

Revision as of 08:17, 28 April 2019

Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for the Review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (TAC Nos. MF0481 and MF0482)
ML14121A179
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/28/2014
From: Sayoc E C
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
To: Gresham J A
Westinghouse
Sayoc E C, 415-4084
References
TAC MF0481, TAC MF0482
Download: ML14121A179 (6)
v • d • e


Text

May 28, 2014

Mr. James A. Gresham Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company, Suite 310, 1000 Westinghouse Drive, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066

Reference CA W-14-3884

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR THE REVIEW OF THE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NOS. MF0481 AND MF0482)

Dear Mr. Gresham:

By letter L44 140116 001 dated January 16, 2014, Tennessee Valley Authority submitted affidavit dated January 13, 2014, executed by James A. Gresham, requesting that the responses to the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390:

Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, 3.0.3-1 (Requests 3b, -3a, 4b, 6b); B.1.34-8; B.1.34-9; A.1-2; Tables 3.3.1, 3.3.2-11, and 3.6.1 (TAC Nos.

MF0481 and MF0482)

Non-proprietary copies of these documents have been placed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Public Document Room and added to the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) library (Package Accession No. ML14058A131).

The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.

(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of 3 CA W-14-3884 Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability. (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.

(iii) There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:

(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a

competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position. (b) It is information that is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.

(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense. (d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire com ponents of proprietary information, anyone component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage. (e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.

(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.

(iv) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.

(v) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.

(vi) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is contained in LTR-RIDA-13-172, Revision 1, Attachment 1 "Final Response to U.S. NRC

RAI B.1.34-8 on the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Reactor Lower Radial Support Clevis Insert Bolts" (Proprietary), for submittal to the Commission, being transmitted by Tennessee Valley Authority letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk. The proprietary information as submitted by Westinghouse is that associated with Unites States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Letter, "Requests for Additional Information for the Review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application (T AC NOS. MF0481 and MF0482) - SET 14," MLl4263A338, September 26,2013, and may be used only for that purpose. (a) This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to: (i) Support reactor vessel internals aging management. (b) Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows: (i) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for the purpose of supporting reactor internals aging management relative to lower radial support operational justification with degraded clevis insert cap screws.

(ii) The information requested to be withheld reveals the distinguishing aspects of a methodology which was developed by Westinghouse. Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar technical evaluation justifications and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.

The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.

In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended.

We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of your statement, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary financial and commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.

Therefore, portions of Enclosure 2 of the letter from Mr. Shea dated January 16, 2014 "Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application, 3.0.3-1 (Requests 3b, -3a, 4b, 6b);

B.1.34-8; B.1.34-9; A.1-2; Tables 3.3.1, 3.3.2-11, and 3.6.1 (TAC Nos. MF0481 and MF0482)," marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. We note that you provided a non-proprietary version, of said January 16, 2014 letter, which is publicly available under ADAMS Accession No. ML14057A808.

Withholding from public disclosure shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public disclosure should change in the future, such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 301-415-4084 or by e-

mail at emmanuel.sayoc@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, /RA Richard Plasse for/

Emmanuel Sayoc, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328

Enclosure:

Requests for Additional Information

cc w/encl: Listserv

ML14057A808.

Withholding from public disclosure shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public disclosure should change in the future, such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 301-415-4084 or by e-

mail at emmanuel.sayoc@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA Richard Plasse for/ Emmanuel Sayoc, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328

Enclosure:

Requests for Additional Information

cc w/encl: Listserv

DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS Accession No.: ML14121A179 *concurred via email OFFICE LA:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR ME:RARB:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR NAME IKing ESayoc RKalikian YDiazSanabria ESayoc (RPlasse for) DATE 5/6/2014 5/19/2014 5/21/2014 5/21/2014 5/28/2014 Letter to J. Gresham from E. Sayoc dated May 28, 2014

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR THE REVIEW OF THE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NOS. MF0481 AND MF0482)

DISTRIBUTION

HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource

RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource

beth.mizuno@nrc.gov

brian.harris@nrc.gov john.pelchat@nrc.gov gena.woodruff@nrc.gov siva.lingam@nrc.gov wesley.deschaine@nrc.gov galen.smith@nrc.gov scott.shaeffer@nrc.gov jeffrey.hamman@nrc.gov craig.kontz@nrc.gov caudle.julian@nrc.gov generette.lloyd@epa.gov gmadkins@tva.gov

clwilson@tva.gov hlee0@tva.gov dllundy@tva.gov

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14121A179&oldid=1535663"