ML13135A244

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B - Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), Sheet 1 of 379 Through Sheet 201 of 379

ML13135A244
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/10/2012
From:	Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Lucarelli B, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML131350549	List: L-13-118, Resubmittal of FENOC Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima. ML13135A229 ML13135A230 ML13135A231 ML13135A233 ML13135A234 ML13135A235 ML13135A236 ML13135A237 ML13135A238 ML13135A240 ML13135A241 ML13135A242 ML13135A243 ML13135A244 ML13135A245 ML13135A246 ML13135A247 ML13135A248 ML13135A249 ML13135A251
References
L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159
Download: ML13135A244 (202)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX B SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS) Sheet I of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEI,RS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2N Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks status(?)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXBBATTERY 2NFloor El. 603 Room 428plManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mountingframe consists of single tier/two row braced racl$.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack tofloor anchorage verified and no significant degraded condition identified.3. ls the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Anchorage inspected and no corrosion identified.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Drawings C-752 (Section B) and E-854Q-l I5-l identify the configuration as four cast in placeand it was confirmed in the field during walkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A Y bolts per row N X X X X X X PCe Paul c'-Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTAT{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2NEquipment Description BATTERY 2N Sheet Equip. Class 15. Battery RacksInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby wooden platfurm identified as a seismic concern.During inspection it was verffied in control process that scaffold is within working period..8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwalls 4016 and 4026 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (12/6/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?of 379 statusc;N u 7l2sl20r2 7125/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 3 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2N Equip. Class StatusG)N u I 5. Battery Racks Equipment Description BATTERY 2N Other supporting or relevant documents and 2N plateID Plate of component 2N general General view of component photos (if any): Sheet 4 of 379ENGINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2NPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. Class BATTERY 2NI 5. Battery Racks 2N Anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors 2N Masonry Wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Status/?)N u Equipment Description Sheet 5 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS & CONSULTAT\ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status/?)N U Equipment ID No. 2N Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description BATTERY 2N 2N wood platform Wood platform erected above battery PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2PEquip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment DescriptionBATTERY 2PLocation: Bldg. AUXB Floor El. 603 4284Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mountingframe consists of single tier/two row braced racl<s.Same conJiguration as 2N.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Rack tofloor anchorage verified and no signfficant degraded condition identified.

3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Anchorage inspected and no corrosion identified.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Drawings C-752 (Section B) E-8548-I I5-l identify the configuration osfour cast in place bolts per row and it was confirmed in the field during walkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 6 of379 status$N u X X N/A N/A X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS

& CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2PEquipment DescriptionBATTERY 2P Sheet Equip. Class 15. Battery RacksInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby wooden platform identified as a seismic concern. During inspection it was verified in control process that scaffold is vithin working period..8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwalls 4016 and 4026 verified to be to be seismically odequatebased on ref. VBW20-800l-I00, Rev I 4 (l 2/6/88).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?of 319 statuf)N u 712512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 8 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTA}STS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Status:EN U Equipment Description Location: Blds. AUXBCHECK VALVE AF 19 Floor El.565 Room 237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Valve in line with 6" pipe properly supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Main line supports inspected and no missing bolts/parts identified.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Main line supports showed adequate condition and no missing parts.N/A X X X X X X PC? P-aul-C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUXTAT'{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9 Equip. ClassCHECK VALVE AF Equipment Description Sheet 9 of379 Status(?)N u0d. Other - check/manual valve l9Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NiA X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv: jli , ,./'vl-'/r ,+rejA 7t25t7012Eddie M. Guerra /"'!:' / '/' '/ 'l) ' /,, {,t. t .ir/ 7;I/ t /,b'i 7/'/7l2s/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l0 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AFl9 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment DescriptionCHECK VALVE AF 19 Status(?\N uOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):AFl9 PlateID Plate of componentAF I 9 General General view of component Sheet 11 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI]TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)N/A N/A status(i) N uEquipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN 1-I LINE STOP VLVLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585 Room 303 Manufacturer. Model. Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve in line with 8" pipe properly supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. ts the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X Sheet 12 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS {i CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionAUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLV statusf)N uInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Pipe runs through shield buildingfrom Auxiliary Building.The effect of seismic dffirential displacement between the Auxiliary Building and the Building on this piping was verified from Calc No. I B M I 2 and found acceptable.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A Shield Y X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: 7t2512012Eddie M. Guerra/',",t-i/ . /' ,('i .,'i ,.'

it*{ t ', t!-rt":W'7125/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l3 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description AUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): AF608 plateID Plate of component Status(flN U AF608 general General view of component Sheet 14 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &.

CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. AF608 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description AUX FEED TO STEAM GEN I-I LINE STOP VLV status(?)N u Run of pipe from AF608 from Auxiliary Building to Shield Building Subject to seismic anchor movements Sheet 15 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS .\. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW10 Equip. ClassFlush Connection 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Status:ON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB Floor El. 565'10.25" Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Valve located on pipe around 3" diameter.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSLIIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BWIO Equip. Class Equipment Description Flush Connection Sheet 16 of379 Status0N U0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra 7/25/2012 ,;f;,,,// ,i\#t'i, 7/25/2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet l7 of 379Paul C. Riz,zo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BWl0 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment DescriptionFlush Connection Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):BW l0 Plate and General ID plate and general view of component Status@N U Sheet l8 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Statust?)N U Equipment ID No. BW21 Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Borated Water Storage Tank Outlet Isolation Location: Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Floor El. 586'Room 304 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No degraded conditionfound. Valve located on -l0" pipe.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet 19 of319Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSUilANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW2lEquip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment DescriptionBorated Water Storage Tank Outlet Isolation StatusON U Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.Do attached lines have adequate flexibilif to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich 7/25/2012// ) /, fj/,./h.i7t// 712512012 Sheet 20 of 379Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS 6( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BW21Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Status(?)N u Equipment DescriptionBorated Water Storage Tank Outlet Isolation Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): BW21 Plate ID plate of component BW2l General General view of component Sheet 2l of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S{ IIONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Status:QN U Equipment DescriptionBUS CILocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585 Room 325 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinet could not be opened during walkdown.

Mounting base found inadequate condition. (See also item 5 below)3. Is the anchorage free oxidation?of corrosion that is more than mild surface NiA N/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified. However,SQUG C-C,SS-C1 calculation wqs used and it was verified that anchorage capacity is adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X X X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTAIT{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 3. Medium Voltage BUS CI Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Nearby fire extinguisher not fixed to wall. Judged not to be significant interaction

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X of 319 Status:tf).q U Switchgear Other Adverse Conditions1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: --&/t"UdrrEddie M. Guerra ,..o,,/ .i Lr.//1t,"' ';d'/i"'// b"f iW'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 23 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTAI\TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ClEquip. Class

3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description BUS C IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C I PlateID Plate of component Status'O U C I General General view of component Sheet 24 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-l Statusfl).J u Equip. Class 12. Air Compressors Equipment Description Emergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor 1-1 Location:

Bldg. AUXB Floor El.585Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.lnstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments'Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Compressor rigidly mounted on skidwith 4-l/2" bolts.Skid is welded to a larger skid. Larger skid anchored tofloor with eight I/2" bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Bolts onframe-skid mountingfound in adequate condition 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X N/A X X X PCESeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-1 Equip. Class 12. Air CompressorsEquipment DescriptionEmergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor l-l SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X of 379 StatusON UOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerua Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 26of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C I I - I Equip. Class 12. Air Compressors Status@N U Equipment Description Emergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor 1- I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Cl l-l plate ID Plate of component Cl l-l general General view of component Sheet 27of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, l nc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Cl l-l Equip. Class12. Air Compressors Equipment Description Emergency Diesel Generator Starting Air compressor l-l ,fo--Cl l-l skid anchorPartial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Cl l-l connection to skid underneath Attachment of component to skid underneath StatusON U Sheet 28 of 319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENCINEf, RS ST CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C2l-l Status:QN UEquip. Class 9. Fans Equipment DescriptionCNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-I Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.638 Room 603Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on 4 spring isolators, eachwith 2-5/8" anchor bolts found in good condition.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditionfoundfor bolts on component baseframe

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-CSS-C2I -I calculation identffies the configuration as four springisolators and it was confirmed in thefield duringwalkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?SQUG calculation C-CSS-C2l-l identffied outlier - vibration isolators onfan base did not provide adequate restraint of overturning moment.

Fixity provided to resolve outlier presented in SQUG calc (MOD95-0031). X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTATITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C2l-lEquipment Description SheetEquip. ClassCNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI -I 9. Fans Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identffied in the congested area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? X X X Xof 379StatusON U N/A Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:/'+il'i;Eddie M. Guerra.', -, /:rlit4;//Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 30 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. C2l-l Equipment DescriptionEquip. Class 9. Fans CNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C2l-1 PlateID Plate of component Czl- I General General view of component Sheet 3lof 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Czl-l Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment Description CNTRL RM EMERG VENT SYS FANI-I StatusG)N U Czl- I anchorage typical View of anchorage Sheet 32 of 379 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3 Equip. Class 9. Fans Status:*)N U Equipment Description VENT FAN 3 Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.s85 Room 319 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Fan suspendedfrom aframe, anchor bolted to ceiling.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Fan is part of ventilation system.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Previous SQUG calculation C-CSS-C25-3 identified connection has adequateflexibility (p.5 of 8)SQUG calculation identified anchors that did not achieve full embedment. Anchorage found acceptable after calculation (p 8 of 8)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGI NEERS & CONSULTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment DescriptionVENT FAN 3 Sheet Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? No potential interaction due tofan location.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?of 379 Status(?)N u 712512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra Date: tii,tt'/..,,' . /// / t '/. /b4 /gitilz Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 34 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONST,}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C25-3 Equip. Class 9. Fans StatusG)N u Equipment DescriptionVENT FAN 3Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Vent Fan C25-3 PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip. Class Equipment Description FAN C31-4 Sheet 35 of319 Status:*)N U 9. FansLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 545 Room 105 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Mounted on 4 lV-shape supports.Each W-shape is anchoredwith two 5/8" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Missing closure nuts along one side of the unit.Confirmedwith maintenance that sheet metal screws are used and nuts are 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Slight corrosion found in wide flanges used for mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? not required.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.E *- GIN EERS & L-ONSU LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip.Equipment Description FAN C3l-4Class 9. FansInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Several pipe lines running intofan housing properly supported vithJloormounted HSS sections.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?36 of 379 statusON u N/A 7/25/20t2 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra ,iiir,,fi/ &\fu;;Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 37 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS &. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status@N U Equipment ID No. C3l-4Equipment Description Equip. Class FAN C3I-49. FansOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): C3l -4 plate ID Plate of component C3l -4 general General view of component Sheet 38 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3l-4 Equip. ClassEquipment Description FAN C3l-49. Fans C3l -4 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Status(?)N u Status(?) N u Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment DescriptionEDG 1 CONTROL PANELLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585 Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?3 sectionpanel anchoredwith I0-1/2" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Cabinetwas openedfor inspection and no degraded conditionor missing parts were observed.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Calculation C-CSS-C3615 identifies the configuration as ten anchor bolts and it wasc onfi r me d in the fi e I d dur i ng w al kdow n ins p e c t i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? pc-e Paul C. Riz-zoAs-sociates, lnc. ENCiINEERS S{ CONSULTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615Sheet 39 of 379 X X X X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENC;INEERS S* CONSUIJIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615Equip. Class 20. lnstrument andEquipment DescriptionEDG I CONTROL PANELInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X Xof 379 Statusf)N u Control PanelsOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra i ,""r' / t' ; '/; '/i /ri/:,: :// &', /h !i//{,'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 41 of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. C3615 Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels EDG I CONTROL PANEL C3615 plate ID Plate of component Other supportins or relevant documents andif any): C3615 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 42 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3615 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionEDG I CONTROL PANEL Status(?)N uC3616 anchorage Anchorage from unit C3616 is similarto C3615 which is cuffently energized Sheet 43 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.Ef,." G t N E ERS & C()NSU LTAN'TS status$ u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585 Room 325 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Cabinet anchoredwith 6-I" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Mounting base found in adequate condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?No signs of significant corrosionfound.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in No cracks identified in mounting base.the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-C3645 and C-CSS-C4625 calculations were used and it wasis adequate for the configuration shown.verified that anchorage capacity6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTA]STSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Equipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X Xof 379 Statusfi)N u PanelsOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Mantainance or movable equipmentfound in the areawith proper tight conditions.Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guera ,;i*,///&it'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 45 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS 6{ CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionCONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER) C3645 PlateID Plate of componentC3645 GeneralGeneral view of component Status/?)N U Sheet 46 of 379 Patrl C. Rizzo Associates, lnr'. LN(;INEI:RS & C()NS[ :l'I ANT s StatusffN USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C3645 Equip. Class 20.lnstrument and Control Panels Equipment Description CONTROL PANEL (AUX FEEDWATER)C3645 Achor Bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Ponel is welded to embed with stitch welds around the perimeter of the panel base, similar to as-built shown in Calc. C-CSS-4603.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Component could not be opened during walkdown. Mounting base found in adequate condition.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-CSS-C4606 and C-CSS-C4603 calculations were used ond it was verffied that anchorage capacity is adequatefor the configuration shown.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 47 of379 Status$N U X X X X X X Sheet 48 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS 6i CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606 Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)StatusON UInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Monorail-hoist located in vicinitv deemed not an interaction concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Rigid conduits on end have rigid supports andwill provide lateral restraint10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: 7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra J.." /'/,'/t:/'.,/ /;t, {j,,r'/,1/.,' 7t25t2012Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 49 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C4606 PlateID Plate of component Status(?)N uC4606 GeneralGeneral view of component Sheet 50 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSI.,ILTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C4606 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment Description REACTOR TRIP BREAKER A (TYPICAL OF 4)C4606 stitch weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Status(?)N uC4606 crane int Sliding crane located in component vicinity. Sheet 5l of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC lN E[.RS & CONSU LT.A.nNTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. C5702Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Status0N UEquipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXBoperator console panels - left Floor El.623 Room 505Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Vo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Anchorage not verffied since is coveredwithfire proofing material.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed during inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?No significant corrosion observed in the component.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-CS,9-C5702 calculation was used and it was verified that anchoragecapacity is adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTA}.JTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5702Equipment Description operator console panels - left Sheet 52of379 Statusfi)N uEquip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 7/25/2012 bifi i /,.!{/712512012 Sheet 53 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.EN( ;INEDRS .\ CONSUI-TANT S StatusFN U Seismic Walkdown ChecklistEquipment ID No. C5702 (swc)Equip. Class 20.lnstrument and Control Panels Equipment Descriptionoperator console panels - left Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): c5702 General view of component Sheet 54 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706 Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.623 Room 505 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage not accessible during inspection since it was covered with fireproofing material.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? None observed due tofireproofing materisl.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?N one ob se rve d dur i ng w alkdow n.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-C,S,S-C5702 and C-C,9S-C5706 calculations were used and it was verifiedthat anchorage copacity is adequatefor the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? 314urf9N uEquip. Class

2. Low Voltage Switchgear MANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOM X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOM Sheet Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?of 379 StatusON U N/A 712512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra,,.."/ i // ,/,r. /,,t{L',:,//' .,b', /h'//gAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 56 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, f nc.ENGINETRS & CONSULTAI.ITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706Equipment Description C5706 plateID Plate of component C5706 front General view of component StatusON UEquip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear MANUAL REACTOR TRIP SWTTCHES (2) IN CONTROL ROOMOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): ,Ol Sheet 57 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTANTS StatusG)N u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5706 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTOR TRrp SWTTCHES (2) rN CONTROL ROOMC57 06 typical interior3 Typical view of interior componentsC5706 rearGeneral view of component Sheet 5E of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSULTATIITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status@N U Equipment ID No. C5706 Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionMANUAL REACTORTRJP SWTTCruS (2) MC5706 bolted to left and right sidesCabinets are bolted together on both sides PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENCINEERS & CONSULTAI\iTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5712 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description operator console panels - right Location: Bldg.AUXBFloor El.Room 505 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Anchorage not verffied since is coveredwithfire proofing material.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with 4-l/2" screws.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?None observed during inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?No significsnt corrosion observed in the component.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Panel is similar to Panel C5702. SQUG calculation C-CSS-C5702 verffies that anchorage capacity is adequate for the configuration shown.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 59 of379 Status0N U 623 X X X N/A X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC INEERS .s{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5712 Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and operator console panels - right Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

60 of 379 StatusFN U Control Panels N/A N/A 7/2512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra.1, ./' /. ) l, '" ,rnt:.r/ b/, //,r4l//Adam L. Helffrich PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.E}JC INEERS & CONSULTAN'TSSheet 6l of379Status@ N USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control PanelsEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet roomLocation: Blde. AUXB Floor El. 623 Room 502 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? 7-Sections cabinet. End cabinets connected by -l/l" welded plates.No access available inside of cabinet.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchor bolts are inaccessible for inspection. However, calculation references C-CSS-C5755C, D & G shows anchorage oultiers were resolved.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None obsented during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?None observed during inspection.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified. However, C-C,SS-C5755C, D & G calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns.A nc h o r age ade q uacy de e me d s e i s mi c al ly ade q uate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A X X X X X X of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEE,RS 6. CONSUTTA}TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755Equip. Class 20. Instrument andEquipment DescriptionControl Room cabinet room Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attoched lines found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Sheet 62 Status(?)N U Control Panels 7t2512012 XOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) C-C,S^S-C5755C, D & G indicate cabinets A to G need to be bolted together to prevent pounding interaction. Issue resolved by MOD95-0032. Field walkdown verified top connection of adjacent panels are per MOD?5-0032. Evaluated bv:Eddie M.Adam L. Helffrich Guerra:! /' ./. ) /; 'l , ): {2.:7/ u', /j'i4l/t Sheet 63 of 379 Paul C. Ri z,zo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSUIJTAI\$TS Status@N USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Room cabinet roomOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): C57 55 plateID Plate of component C57 55 anchorage General view of anchorage detailC57 55 generalGeneral view of component C57 55 anchorage Closeup of anchor bolts and channel mounting base. Sheet 64 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSL}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5755 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Status(?)N uEquipment Description Control Room cabinet room C5755 anchorage blocked interiorC57 55 Cabinet bracingTop bracing detail for end cabinetsC57 55 Cabinets welding Welded plates detail for middle cabinets DCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTA]qTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment Equipment ID No. C5792ALB2Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARD Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 623 Room 502Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? No degraded condition identified.Cabinet is attached to adjacent panel C5782 at top. Panel is composed of 2 sections which are attached tagether at top and mounted on some skidwith I2-l/2" bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchor bolts are inaccessible for inspection. However, SOUG calculation C-CSS-C5792A presents no significant degraded condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed during walkdow n. Sheet 65 of379 Status:@N U X X X 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in lVa cracks identffied near cabinet base.the concrete near the anchors?

5. ls the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)At the time of the walkdown the equipment could not be opened.for inspection.

SQUG C-CS^S-CS792 calculation was used and it was verified that anchorage capacity is adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Skid mounting and base framingfound in adequate conditions. X X X Sheet 66 of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment Description SFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARD Status(?)N u XInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Wall identified as 5197 confirmed to be adequqate based on Ref C-CSS-C57929. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiA N/A X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffiich 7/25/2012 7/25/2012 Sheet 67 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment Description SFRCS CHANNEL2 LOGIC BOARDOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): C5792A plateID Plate of component Status(?)N u C5792A generalGeneral view of component RPau_l c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS {iI CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALBZ Equip. Class20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinetEquipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL 2 LOGIC BOARDC5792A anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors C5792A bolted to cabin et at right Adjacent cabinets are bolted togetherSheet 68 of 379 StatusG'\N u Sheet 69 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C5792ALB2 Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment DescriptionSFRCS CHANNEL2 LOGIC BOARD C5792A bolted to cabinet at left Adjacent cabinets are bolted together C5792A logic board inside cabinetView of Logic Board inside the cabinet Status(?)N u Sheet 70 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.EN(}INEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C73-l Status*)N u Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionAFP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.s65 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Fan is mounted onfour spring isolators supported by rod hangers.Rod hangers are attached to steel support structure, which is anchored to the Q-deckwithfour 3/8" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing bolts identified associated with component supports.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?None observed during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

3/8" diameter anchor bolts supporting the fan support assembly are shown to be seismically adequate in Calculation C-CSS-73-1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X N/A N/A N/A N/A X X X X of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INEE RS & CONSUXTAI\TTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C73-lEquipment DescriptionEquip. Class 9. Fans AFP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Calculation C-CSS-73-l evaluates the expansion joints and shows seismic adequacy. Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Sheet 7lStatus@N U 712512012 XAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 72 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)statusG)N u Equipment ID No. C73-l Equipment Description Equip. Class 9. FansAFP ROOM EXHAUST FANOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): C73-l GeneralGeneral view of component C73-l plate and anchorage no lateral bracing View of anchorage, no lateral bracing is visible for hanging fan Sheet 73 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2 Equip. Class 9. Fans Status:O. UEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2Floor El. 603 Room 428/tManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Anchors identified to be tnstalled into decking ridges.SQUG calc C-CSS-C79-L used as reference since is similar component.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?N one observed during w alkdow n.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?None ob served during w alkdow n.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Anchors installed through steel decking.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Yes. Verffication based on calculations for component C78-l , calc ID C-CSS-C78-l .Calcualtion C-CSS-C79-I shows I/2"diam anchors inserted into ridges are acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Asso-ciates, Inc.ENGINEERS S. CONSULTAI.{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2 Equip. Class 9. Fans Equipment DescriptionBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2.2 Sheet 74 of379 StatusG)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Scaffold in the area not a concern due tofan elevation.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capaciQ of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 4016 verified to be seismicolly adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (12/6/58).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Fanfound to be adequately stffined against lateral motionwith bracing and componentframing. Evaluated by: 7125t20r2-_-fu-/Mdr Eddie M. Guerra"..! t I; ,./r"'" t 1' . ,,t./ i/ ./ . / /. .'/J.//,/ ,4r/.,'.{/' ?- t [:,4: ,'7125t20r2 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 75 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2Equip. Class

9. FansEquipment Description BATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):C78-2 Plate ID Plate of component status(?)N uC78-2 General General view of component Sheet 76 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, f nc.ENGINEERS S( CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. C78-2 Equip. Class 9. FansEquipment DescriptionBATTERY ROOM VENT FAN 2-2 Status@N U C78-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 77 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI]TANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. CCl469Equip. Class AOV CC T469 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves StatusO N UEquipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 545 Room ll3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Com pleting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mounted on -16" diam line installed right before containment penetration.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. EN{}INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CCl469 Equip. ClassEquipment Description AOV CC 1469 Sheet 7. Pneumatic-Operated Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do affached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines showed adequote flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions 1 l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?of 319 Status/?)N U Valves 7/2s/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 79 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI,-}LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CC I 469 Equip. ClassEquipment Description AOV CC I469 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves StatusG)N u Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): cc I 469General view of component PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENC INEERS & CONSI,'LTAhJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS1530 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesSheet 80 of379 Statu$ N uEquipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY TRAIN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMP 1-I DISCHARGELocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585 Room 303Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Limitorgue has a nut on the lower part of the actuator that holds thecover on that is notfully torgued down. Judged not to affect operabilityof component.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? N/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Main line anchor support shows not enough grout below anchor plate.Main line presents sfficient lateral bracing. Not considered as adverse condition, 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI-TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CSl530 Equipment DescriptionStatusON UEquip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesCONTAINMENT SPRAY TRATN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMPDISCHARGESheet 8l of379 Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Seismic anchor motion confirmed acceptable per calc I B R/12.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 7/25/2012, '. ,., L/r , #rti{'4/7/25t20r2 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 82 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS S( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS 1530 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Status(?)N u Equipment DescriptionCONTAINMENT SPRAY TRAIN I INJECTION VALVE AT PUMP I-I DISCHARGECS 1530 plate ID Plate of componentCS 1530 generalGeneral view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and DCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description PURGE VALVE ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXB Floor El. 643 Room 600 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Valve located to the side of main line right before wall penetration.Sheet 83 of379Status:@N U X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005Equip. Class 0d. Other - checUmanualEquipment Description PURGE VALVE ISOLATION SheetInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

A tt ac he d I i ne s found w ith adequate fl exib il i ty.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X x 84 of 379 Statusfr)N u valve N/A N/A N/A Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra ,iiot,'/^/,/i/. /{i+r/., Jt z'lFtAdam L. Helffiich Sheet 85 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUI-JTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CV-5005 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description PURGE VALVE ISOLATIONOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status@N U CV-5005 generalGeneral view of valve connected to main lines PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 585 Rooma ^-l JLJManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet 86 of379 ENCTNEERS & CONSULTAT{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DlEquipment Description BUS Dl Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Cabinet composed of I3 sections.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Verified plug welds at the front of one section that was opened.for inspection.Verification of anchorage of other sections deferred to previous SEWS in Calc

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? None observed during inspection.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Panel door was closed and anchorage inside cabinet could not be verified.

However,SOUG C-CSS-DI calculation'was used and it was verified that onchorage capacityis adequatefor the configuration shown. Verified the three 7/8" to 1.25" plugwelds atfront ofone opened panel section.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? statu$ u C-CSS-D1.N/A Y X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEf,RS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class

3. Medium VoltageEquipment DescriptionBUS DIInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from No maintenance equipmentimpact by nearby equipment or structures?identified in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Relative movement not a concern since attached lines are rigidly c onnected w ith component.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Fire extinguisher in area judged not to be operability issue.

X X X X 87 of 379 StatusG)N u Switchgear N/A N/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerrai t , 'r' " ,' .-t / lt ,/ ,t'./,)'ft + ".,7/ E/ r!i,lr't't{' Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 88 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Status'O* U Equipment DescriptionBUS DIOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Dl Plate ID ID Plate of componentDl General General view of component Sheet 89 of 379 Paul C. Rizz,o Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage SwitchgearEquipment DescriptionBUS DID I Inside CabinetView of floor detail inside Dl cabinet Status'O* U PCePaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS ST CONSU LTAN'TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl ED Equip. Class l. Motor Control CentersSheet 90 of 379Statuff\N U Equipment Description MCC 1 Location: Bldg.AUXB Floor El.Room 429 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? MCC composed of I4 sections welded to embedded channels with an cverageof 5.5" long 3/16" welds atfront and back of the unit.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?6033. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is oxidation?N one observed during w alkdow n.more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? N one observed during w alkdow n.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Top bracingverified against drawing C-0233 and SQ(lG colculationC,S^9-CS-D C MCC I verified existing anchorage.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl EDEquipment Description MCC I Equip. Class l Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Cabinets are interconnected and braced to wall at top.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X Xof 319 StatusON u Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: _-_w{&/.drEddie M./ t 't, ./,L/, /hi'i//,,Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 92 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Dl EDEquipment Description MCC I Equip. Classl. Motor Control Centers Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): StatusG)N u Dl ED plate ID Plate of component Dl ED general General view of componentDl ED stitch weld Partial view of welded base detail. Sheet 93 of3l9 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENG INEERS & CONSUITA\TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. Class 14. Distributionstatufr)N u Panels Equipment DescriptionPNL DIN Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 429/i Manufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Similar anchorage configurotion asfor D2N (Drm,ing E-20-4-7).

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Mounting inspected and no missing parts identified.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No signs of excesive corrosion identffied during inspection.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No craclrs identffied at based anchorage grout.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Configurationfor D2N is used as reference. Drowing C-0220D identifies the configuration as four 7/8"diam anchor bolts and it was confirmed in the field during walkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X Sheet 94 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc. ENGINEf, RS & CONST,'LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. Class Equipment Description PNL DINI 4. Distribution Panels Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?No maintenance equipment identified in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X Xof 379StatusG)N uOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (AdditionalComponents YRF3 and pages may be added as necessary) YV3 associated with D I N. Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra,! /' / I ,/,, :if'trr,'/ E', /i'!7,?Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 95 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. CONSULTAhITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?')N u Equipment ID No. DIN Equipment DescriptionEquip. ClassPNL DIN14. Distribution PanelsOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Q0s$3{S$T'46 NO. DIN DIN plateID Plate of component DIN General General view of component Sheet 96 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENC INEERS {S{ CONSUI TANT'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DIN Equip. Class Status(fiN Ul 4. Distribution Panels Equipment DescriptionPNL DIND lN anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.E}I(]INEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description MCC2 Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 428Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., isof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? MCC composed of I4 sections welded to embedded channels of 5.5" long 3/16" welds atfront and back of the unit.Sheet 97 of379 Status$N Uthe item onewith an overage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to inside of component for anchorap;e inspection.Missing bolt mentioned in C-CSS-DCMCC-002.

Resolved by work request 95-1368

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No excesive corrosion identified around base detail.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified at cabinet base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Top bracing provided by numerous top entry conduit. SQUG calculationC,S,S- C,S-, C MC C I and C S- D C MC C 2 v e r ffi ed e x i s t i ng a nc h o r age.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A X X X X X X PCe PaulC. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENG INEERS E( CONSUIXAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description }dCC 2 Sheet 98 of379 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

MCC supported at the top b1t large conduits providing lateral restraint.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Mantainance cartfound near the area. Judged not to be a significant interaction. Status/?)N u N/A 7125t2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra ,;ii',ry/ p',#"i, Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 99 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEE RS S( CONSULTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control Centers Equipment Description MCC2D2 ED plateID Plate of component Status(?'\N u D2 ED general General view of component Sheet I 00 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6. CONSI-ILTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2 EDEquip. Class l. Motor Control Centers Equipment DescriptionMCC 2 Status(?\N uD2 ED stitch weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors D2 ED carts intUnsecured carts near unit can cause relay chatter on impact PC? Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGI NEERS \{{ CONSULT,q.IVNSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2N Equip. Class 14. Distribution PanelsEquipment Description PNL D2NLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 4288 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This panel is part of a line-up thut includes YRF4 and YV4. Each panelis anchored to the concrete withfour 3/4" diameter anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No missing parts or degraded condition identified during the inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No significant corrosion identffied in cabinet and mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV4 includes seismic qualification of the anchorage for this panel.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet l0l of379 StatuseN u X X X NiA N/A N/A Y X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo- Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & C()NSL; l-TAs..T'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2NEquipment Description PNL D2N SheetEquip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified. Blockwall 4016 verffied to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. I/8W20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/SS).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adverselv affect the safetv found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? t02of 379 statu$N u N/A N/A 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: ,4;ffi'4,{/{h,.1".Vr4 Eddie M. Guerra'u,/ / /, / ,/;" ":1{:}:.:r"/ bt, fi, t,'///'/Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 103 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTAI\STS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2N Equip. ClassPNL D2N Statuff) N UI 4. Distribution PanelsEquipment Description Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): D2N plateID Plate of component D2N general General view of component Sheet 104 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S,. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Statuft N U Equipment Equipment ID No. D2N Description Equip. ClassPNL D2N I 4. Distribution Panels tD2N 4 anchor bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors D2N masonry walls Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit Sheet 105 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS &" CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. D2P Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Status(T)N u Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB PNL D2PFloor El.603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? No signrficant c orrosion identifeid4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Drawing C-0220E identffies the configuration as four 3/4" anchor bolts and it wasc o nfi r me d in the fi e I d dur i n g w al kdow n i nspe c t i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. D2P Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL D2PInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Fire extinguisher in area judged not to be an operability issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

106of 379 statusf?)N u 7t2s/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra iiiz',71 /':'fiip Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 107 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DZP Equip. ClassPNL DzP StatusG\N u14. Distribution PanelsEquipment Description D2P plateID Plate of componentOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): DzP general General view of component DzP anchor bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Pcel"tl C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS S{ CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DA-3783 Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB Sheet 108 of379 Status:$rl USOLENOTD VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-I-1, T86.IFloor El. 585 Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mounted on I/4" pipe line.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. DA-3783 Equip. Class 88. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description SOLENOID VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-1.1 T86-1Sheet 109 of379StatusON U Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Components is surrounded by air compressor tanks.N o s i gnrfi c ant p ot e nt ial i nte r act i on w as founde d.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guera!ifn'"'//. t .'/, '/"b',1/*i'#,' Date: 7t25/2012 Date: 7/2s/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I l0 of379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DA-3783 Equip. Class 88. Solenoid Valves Equipment DescriptionSOLENOID VALVE FROM AIR START RECEIVER I-I-I, T86-IOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status/?)N U DA3783 plateID Plate of componentDA3 783 general General view of component Sheet lll of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS & C(}NSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBCIPN Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Invertersstatu$N uEquipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB CHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Floor El. 603 Room 429 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Four ] " diameter anchors at corners and six l " diameter anchors on sides. OKStffined base on -l l/2" grout pad.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to mounting anchorage and/or documentation.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?is more than mild surface N/A N/A N/A N/A4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on previously inspected similar mounting and skid details, it is judged that no potential adverse condition is presented by this newly installed charger. Outside condition looks in good state and noadverse condition were identified for previous similar cases. X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGIN EERS 6. CONSUITAN'TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. DBCIPN Equipment Description (swc)Equip. Class CHARGER (Newly 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters installed equipment) Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? L Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified.Blockwall 4016 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBW20-8001-l 00, Rev I 4 (l 2/6/88).Nearby fire extinguisher judged not to be an operability issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?of 379StatusON U 7/25/2012 X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra ,'ir,t1 / t,' ; '/l '/,';f,* "// i-", 7//" i"{'*'Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 13 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. DBCIPN Equipment Description Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters CHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): DBCIPN plate ID Plate of component DBCIPN general General view of component lI4 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBCIPN Equipment Description Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters status(?)N u CHARGER (Newly installed equipment) DBC I PN anchorage inaccessible Anchorage is not visible PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. E\CINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Sheet I l5 of379 statusc\ u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2P Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionCHARGER 2PLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.603Room 428Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1 Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Skid mounting identffiedwith 4-I" anchor bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? No missing parts or degraded condition identified during the inspection.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?No significant corrosion identffied in cabinet and mounting base.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracks identified at base grout.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%

forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SQUG C-CSS-DBC2P calculation was used and it was verified that anchorage capacityis adequate for the configuration shown.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y Y Y Y Y N/A N/A N/A Y X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo-Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTAXIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2P Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description CHARGER 2PSheet 116 of3l9 StatusON U Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwall 4026 no referencesfoundfor seismic analysis.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra ,'!1 i i. i Zr' /if'r ; 1/ Ett/h"'/'/'t2' Date: 7lzsl20r2 Date: 7/2s120r2Adam L. Helffrich R Paul crlizz-:r Associates. Inc. ENCINET,RS & CONSL]I TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2P Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and InvertersEquipment DescriptionCHARGER 2P Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DBC2P plate StatusffiN U Sheet 117 of 379ID Plate of component DBC2P masonryPotential interaction hazard from wallsmasonry wall near unit Sheet I l8 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc, ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PNEquipment Description Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Status:O U CHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Location: Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 603 Room 428Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No access to inside of cabinets.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No access to mounting anchorage and/or documentation.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on previously inspected similar mounting and skid details, it is judged that no potential adverse condition is presented by this newly installed charger. Outside condition looks in good state and noadverse condition were identifiedfor previous similar coses.N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X 19 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc. ENCINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PNEquipment Description Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters CHARGER (Newly installed equipment)Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified. Blockwall 4016 verified to be to be seismically adequate based onref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev I4 (12/6/SS). Nearby fire extinguisher and barrier judged not to be significant interactions.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Sheet StatusSN u 7t2s/2012 X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Date: Eddie M. Guerra,4.sj' .. i /, / . "/l', '/ii/i'/,,/ /t,"/2 i'{,/i1." Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 120 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEI,RS & CONSULTANTSStatus'S U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DBC2PN Equip. Class16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description CHARGER (Newly installed equipment) Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DBC2PN plateID Plate of component DBC2PN general General view of component DBC2PN anchorage inaccessible Anchorage is not visible PCePaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E NGINEERS 6i CONSL;' LTATHTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DHl0l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valveof 379 Statusff)N UEquipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXBSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHR Floor El.597', Room 312 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Small checkvalve located on -10" diameter pipe line.No degraded condition identified.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y N Y N Y N Y N N Y X X X X X X PC? Paul C. Rizzo Asso-ciates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. DHl0l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual Equipment DescriptionSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHR Sheet Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verffied. Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verffied to be to be seismically odequatebased on ref. VBWI6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) and VBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/SS)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?122of 379StatusFN U valve 7/25/2012 7t25/2012 X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Date: Date: Guerra:t /'/.),/, /. rii/. t:/// it', {j i'412'Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M.Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 123 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DHl0l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment DescriptionSFP Inlet Line Vent from DHROther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):DH l0l generalGeneral view of component StatusG)N u S: ffii$ Sheet 124 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Eir-GINEERS & CONSU ffANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DH9BEquip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesStatusif)N u Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.545MOV DH 98 Room 225 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve located on line attached to containment wall.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A NiA X X X X X X SheetPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS !I CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DH9B Equipment DescriptionMOV DH 98 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with adequote flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? 125 of 379 Status:(V)N u Valves N/A 7/2512012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra-i,", i /.t,'/, '/' r/,r t,7l' b', /l"i :1,'rV./Adam L. Helffrich PC? Paul C. Rizzo-Associates, [nc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearSheet 126 of379 StatusSN UEquipment DescriptionBUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearLocation: Blde. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 429 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Component composed of 7 sections. End panels were opened und verified plug welds at front (2-l/4"diam at I9"oc).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage not vissible thus verification based on adequacy per SQUG calc C-CSS-EI.SQUG calculations show anchorage to be adequatefrom previous outlier resolution.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUUIANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. ClassEquipment Description BUS El, Low Voltageof 3792. Low Voltage Switchgear SwitchgearInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduit rigidly supported.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Sheet t27status(?1N u 7/25/2012 X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 128 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS C( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage SwitchgearEquipment Description BUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):E I plateID Plate of componentE I generalGeneral view of component Status(?)N u Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS S( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El Equip. Class 2.Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description BUS El, Low Voltage SwitchgearE I anchorage inaccessible Anchorage is not visible Sheet 129 of 379Status(?'\N u Sheet 130 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. class l. Motor control centersStatus0N UEquipment Description MCC EI lBLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585 Room 304 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This is a I0 sections trICC. Each section is welded to embedded channel withan average of 6" long, 3/I6" welds. Top bracing provided per drawing C-0233.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Top bracing of this MCC verified against Drmuing C-0233. SQUG calculation C-CSS-EI I B provides qualffication calculationsfor the base welds and the top bracing.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? NiA N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C' Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTATJTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC El1B l. Motor Control Centers Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X X X Sheetof 379 StatusON U N/A Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Date: Date: Sheet 132 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS 6( CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC El lB Status(?)N u l. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):El lB plateID Plate of componentEl lB generalGeneral view of component Sheet 133 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc. ENGINEERS &. CONSUIXAI{TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El lB Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El lB l. Motor Control CentersEl lB stitch weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Status(?)N u El lB is bolted between El lC Units are bolted together to prevent pounding PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENCINEERS & CONSUUTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El2B Equip.Equipment Description MCC El2B Sheet 134 of379Status:f)N U Class 1. Motor Control Centers Location: Bldg.AUXB Floor El.585 Room 318 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a 4 section MCC (including panel YEI), welded to embed channels withan average of 6" long 3/16" fillet welds per section.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Top bracing provided by several top entry conduit. sQ(lG calculationC-CSS-El28 provides qualification calculations for the base welds.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E12B Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El2B Sheetl. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Scafoldingfound near equipment properly braced. No interoction concern.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines rigidly connected to cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?-l/2" gapfound between back of cabinet andwater line.Interactioniudged not to be a problem due to rigidity of cabinet and provided top bracing.X X X X 135of 379Statusrf)N U N/A Other Adverse Conditions1 l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: , '.)tcl t-JvT 4-r Eddie M. Guerra./'j""' / t I //' /u/2',:,',/ li t r' /U'i'tfi, Date: Date: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 136 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENCINEERS & CONSULTAIVTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Elzc Equip. class l. Motor control centersStatus*')N uEquipment DescriptionMCC EI2CLocation: Bldg. INTKFloor El. 576 Room 5lManufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a 4 section MCC, welded to embed channels vith an average of at least 5" long, j/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditions found for base stitch welds.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is oxidation?

more than mild surface4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No cracl<s identified in grout at mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Top bracing of this MCC verified against Drmuing C-0233. SQ(IG calculation C-CSS-EI28 provides qualification calculations for the base welds and the top bracing.Base welds verified against drawing C-04128, section L.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? No significant degraded condition identified during inspection. Anchorage configuration capacity is provided in C-CSS-EI2C and VFI2/800-008 shown to be adequate.N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc. ENCINEERS C. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. El2C Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC El2C l. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?S c afo I ding fo und n e ar c o mp o ne nt a de q uat e ly b r ac e d.No interaction concern.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines rigidly connected to cabinet.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?l/2 gapfound betuueen bock of cabinet andwater line.No interaction concern due to overall rigidity of cabinet and provided top bracing.

X X X X r37of 379Status$ u N/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Missing grout at lower right of component is cosmetic and judged not to be an adverse seismic condition. Evaluated by: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 138 of379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS E4 CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ElzC Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC ElzC status(?\N ul. Motor Control Centers Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): ElzC plateID Plate of component ElzC general General view of component Sheet 139 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. El2CEquipment Description Equip. ClassMCC EI2Cl. Motor Control Centers El2C grout missingView of mounting base showing stitch weld detail and grout Close up view of gap identified between back of cabinet and conduit. ElzC gap conduit and cabinet Sheet 140 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ElzC Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC ElzCStatus(?)N u

l. Motor Control Centers ElzC Scaffold View of scafolding near component Sheet 141 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSLJLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 822-l Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers statusf?)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB CCW HEAT EXCHANGER 1-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-1 Floor El.585Room 328 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?NiA3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Nozzle load issue identffied and documented in PCAQ99-1945, and subsequently resolved by MoD 98-0058. ]QUG calculation c-css-E22-l shows seismic adequacy of the as-installed design.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X X X X X Sheet 142 of379 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, fnc. ENGINEI,RS S. CONSUUIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. E22-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status(?)N u Equipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I.I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-1 X Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified. Blockwalls 3307, 3397 and 3407 verffied to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWl7-8001-088, Rev 6 (6/21/89), vBWl9-8001-094, Rev 5 (6/3/06) and VBWI9-8001-095, Rev t 0 (7/5/06).9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexibilily of drain piping judged acceptable to accommodate thermal growth of the heat exchanger.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A N/A N/A X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:7 t25/2012 Eddie M. Guerra r't',r' / li'/;'/' ';;lht!/ /U"'#';rW' 7t2s/20r2 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 143 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUIJTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-l Equipment DescriptionOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): 822-l plateID Plate of component 822-l generalGeneral view of componentStatus(?)N u Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-I Sheet 144 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus(?)N u Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-I AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-I 822-l anchorage left Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors 822-l Welded Anchor Configuration of the Welded Anchor Plate Sheet 145 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2 Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verificationof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such required (i.e., is the item one verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Nozzle load issue identified and documented in PCAQ9}-t945, and subsequently resolvedby MoD 98-0058. ]QUG calculation G-CSS-E22-l shows seismic adequacyof the as-installed design.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A Status:QN UEquip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers CCW HEAT EXCHANGER I -2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2Floor El. 585 Room 328 X X X X X X Sheet 146of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITAT.TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?)N u Equipment ID No. E22-2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexibility of drain piping judged acceptable to accommodate thermal growth ofthe heat exchanger.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Date: 7/25/20t2 Date:7 /2s/20r2 Sheet 147 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionCCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2 822-2 plateID Plate of component 822-2 generalGeneral view of component Status@N U RPaul c. Rizzo-Ass,ociates, [nc. ENGINEERS & CONSU LTAT -NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 822-2 Equip. Class 2l . Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER I-2 AT DISCHARGE OF CCW PUMP 43-2 822-2 anchorage left side Anchorage at left side of the saddle at fixed end Sheet 148 of 379 StatusON U 822-2 anchorage right side Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Sheet 149 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS S. CONSUXTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-l Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status@N UEquipment Description DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-1 .827.1Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.545 Room ll3 _Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Tank mounted on two saddles, each anchored with 4- I " bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Nozzle load identified and documented in PCAQ?7-0068, subsequently resolvedby MOD97-0068. SQUG Calculation C-CSS-E27-001 shows seismic adequacy of the ss - ins tal I e d c onfi gur at i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionDECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-1 .827.1 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?I 50 of379 StatusON U 7t2512012 7/25/2012 X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra ,u',{ i /,, / {t, i'll.?rt:/ fr', /h4W'Date: X Adam L. Helffrich Date: Sheet 151 of379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment Description DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -1,827-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): 827-l plate ID Plate of componentStatus U 827-l general2General view of component Sheet 152 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, [nc. ENCINEE,RS d{ CONSUIJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. 827-l Equipment Description Equip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat ExchangersStatus$ U DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I.I.E27-I 827 - I anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors E27 -l Slotted hole toSlotted hole between allow for expansionsaddle and component Sheet I 53 of 379 Paul C. Ri zz,o Associates, lnc.En"(j INEERS & CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-1 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -1,827-IStatus$ U 827-l weldedjointJoint welded as specified in MOD 97-0068 PC? t"d c. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITAT\TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-2 Equip. Class

21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBSheet 154 of379 StatusG)N U DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-2. E27-2Floor El.545 Room ll3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Tank mounted on two saddles, each anchoredwith 4-1" bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Nozzle load identified and documented in PCAQ97-0068, subsequently resolvedby MOD97-0068. SQUG Calculation C-CSS-E27-001 shows seismic adequacy of the as - i ns t al I e d c o nfi gur at i o n.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS ST CONSULTA}ITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 827-2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DECAY FIEAT REMOVAL COOLER I-2" 827-2 Sheet Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?155of 379Status:C} u N/A N/A 7t25/2012 X x X XOther Adverse ConditionsI 1. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Eddie M. Guerra X Evaluated bv: Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 1 56 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-2 Equip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -2,E27-2Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): 827 -2 plate ID Plate of component Status: U E27 -2 generalGeneral view of component Sheet 157 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS S( CONSUIiTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E27-2 Equip. Class 21 . Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description DECAY HEAT REMOVAL COOLER I -2,827-2 Status.S U 827 -Z anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors827-2 weldJoint welded as specified in MOD 97-0068 PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENGINEERS & CONSLiLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EFI2C Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC EFI2CSheet 158 of379status(f) N u

l. Motor Control CentersLocation: Bldg.

INTKFloor El.576 Room 52 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage1.ls the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50ah of SWEL items requiring such verification)?2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) This is a 4 section MCC, welded to embed channels with an average of at least5" long, 3/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back). Top bracing provided per drmuing C-0233.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEI,RS & CONSULTAISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. EF12C Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC EFI2C l. Motor Control Centers Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?Seismic capacigt of blockwalls in the area verified Blockwall 2371verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWL0-8001-055, Rev I4 (2/10/57)9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X159 of 379StatusFN UOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra,,-,! . /' i, 1' ;r: '/.rf,t:,/ i/,, /t :1i/,/Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 160 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENCINEERS &. CONSI,ILTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EFI2C Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC EFI}C EFI2C plateID Plate of component Status Ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): EFI2C generalGeneral view of component RPa*l c. Rizzo Associates, Inc. EN(; I N EE,RS & CONSU I,T.{n:TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. EFI}C Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC EFI}C Sheet 16l of 379Status$Irr Ul . Motor Control CentersEF I 2C anchorage hidden View of mounting base showing stitch weld detailEFI2C brace leftView of channel section used to restrain front-to-back motion. Same detail at opposite side. PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS S. CONSULTAN1TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. Fl Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AUXBSheet 162 of379 StatusQN U Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear BUS Fl, Low Voltage Switchgear Floor El. 603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Component composed of 7 sections. Inspected two end sections atfront and verffied n'vo plug welds -3/4" diameter.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Base groutfound in good condition.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Verffication based on adequacy per SQUG calc C-CSS-Ft. SQUG calculations show anchorage to be adequate from previous outlier resolution, page 9 of28.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/A X X X X X X Sheet 163 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl Equip. class 2.Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description IUq Fl, Low Voltage Switchgear Statusf)N U Interaction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI L Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: 7/25/2012Eddie M. Guerra ,,t i,1, 1,';r;.. ,'itir'.:g' E t,lij,'i'W' 7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 164 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, I nc.E NG I N E tlRS 6i CONS[." l.TAl -**T'S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl Equip. Class Equipment Description BUS Fl, Low Voltage StatusftN U 2. Low Voltage Switch gear Switchgear Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Fl general (plate inaccessible) General view of componentF I anchorage inaccessible Sheet 165 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSULTAI\r1TSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F108-l Equip. class 0c. other - sub-component Status$N UEquipment Description EDG I-I INTAKE FILTERLocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El.585 Room 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instruitions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Anchorage could not be verified since it was fully covered by roof cover.SQUG Calc C-CSS-F108 taken as referencefor anchorage condition.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? No detail provided in calc. Unable to view during inspection.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Outlier specified in calculation C-CSS-F108 with respect to anchorage capacity Calculation provides an outliner close out note specifuing a modification (#MOD 95-0029) for additional anchors.N/A X X X X X X pce Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENG TNET,RS & CONSU LTAIJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F108-l Equipment Description EDGSheet 166 of3l9StatusON U Equip. Class 0c. Other - sub-componentI-I INTAKE FILTER Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Filter cover deemed to be capable of resisting external hazards.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: 7t25/20t2 Eddie M. Guerra ,., ! /' ,", ,l ,l; '/'., t{u"": !/ /'/t'/}" !';'!;('7 /25t2012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 167 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI,-'LTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status U Equipment ID No. Fl08-lEquipment Description Equip. Class 0c. Other - sub-componentEDG I-I INTAKE FILTEROther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Fl08-l plate IDID Plate of componentF 108- I general General view of component F I 08- I Encasing AnchroageView of Intake encasing anchroage condition. Sheet 168 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENG IN EERS & CONSULIAINTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. class 1. Motor control centers Statu{TJ N uEquipment Description MCC FI IALocation: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 603 Room 427Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This is an I I section MCC, welded to embed channels with an average of atleast 5" long, 3/l6" fillet welds per section (front and back).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?N o de grade d c onditi ons found for b ase stitch w e I ds.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Separationfound on base grout at end of cabinet.Identified as an aestetic concern, therefore no significant adverse ffict.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)Stitch weld detail verified in detail I 5 of drawing C-02 3 3 and confirmed to beconsistent with walkdown inspection (drawing I /4" weld 3-6oc). SQUG Calculation C-CSS-FI IA provides qualification of as-installedwelded anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTA}TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC F11A1. Motor Control Centers Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Nearby ladderfoundwith poor tie-ffi but judged not a potential hazard to this MCC.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top conduits provide adequate top bracing to MCC.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Adjacent panels CDFI IA-1 and CDFL lA-2 have a gap of -l/4" to this MCC, but the top connection of these panels to the MCC negates any interaction potential.

X X X X 169of 379status N u N/A Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 170 of 379 Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUTJTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N u Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equipment Description Equip. Class l. Motor Control Centers MCC FIIA Other supporting or relevant documents and hotos if any):Fl lA plateID Plate of componentFl lA general General view of component R Pa*l-9. Rr:ro Al,::r:,i1tes, t:rs, EN(;INE[RS & CONSL;I TAI{T SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. Classl . Motor Control Centers Equipment DescriptionMCC Fl IA Sheet 17 l of 379StatusfhN uFl lA stitch weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsFl lA rigid connection to adjoining conduit and MCCA rigid connection is used to fasten the unit to adjoining conduit Sheet 172 of 379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl lA Equip. Class l. Motor Control Centers Equipment DescriptionMCC FI lA Status(?)N uF I I A crack in base of grout on cornerSeparation in base grout. Appears to be aestetic grout only.Fl lA poorly secured ladder in area of MCC Ladder loosely tied off. PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENCINEERS & CONSL]LTA}.TTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 0. Other Traveline water screen F I -2 Sheet 113 of379Statufr)N U Location: BIdg. INTKManufacturer, Model, Etc.Floor El. 585 Room 50 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight corrosion identified in bolts due to humid environment.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Although slight corrosionfound on screen mounting base, no significant degraded condition was identified during inspection. X X X X X X pc"te Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGTNEERS & CONSULTATITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-z Equip. Class Equipment Description Traveling water screenSheet 114 of379StatusFN U

0. Other Ft-2Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigidly attqched lines, no concern of dffirential displacement.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Inside of screen housingwas accessible and no degraded condition was identffied. Motor located on top of screen housingfound in adequate condition. Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 7/25/2012 ,/;-,"*/ lL 4'ir&'.i;7/25120t2 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 175 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-z Equipment Description Status(?)N u Equip. Class 0. Other Traveling water scree n F l -2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Fl-2 plateID Plate of component Fl-2 general General view of component Sheet 176 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINET]RS t! CONSUI TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl-2 Equip. Class 0. OtherEquipment Description Traveling water screen F l -2 Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchorsF l-l is opened for inspection because it is more visible than Fl-2 StatusffiN U"h-1*t ttF l-2 anchorage Fl-l inside Sheet 177 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.ENCINEERS & CONSUI,TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. Fl2A Equip. class l. Motor control centers status$\ u Equipment DescriptionMCC FI2A Location: Bldg. AUXB Floor El. 603Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is an 8 section MCC, but it is in-line with two other MCC sections (MCC FI4 and MCC FI 5).It was verified that all adjacent sections are bolted together. Each section of MCC is welded toembed channels atfront and backwith an average of at least 5" long, 3/16" fillet welds.Y2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No degraded conditions foundfor base stitch welds.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No craclrs identified in sloped grout at mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the S0o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)SOUG Calculation C-CSS-FI2A provides qualification of as-installedwelded anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X X x X X X Sheet 178 of3l9 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc. ENCINEERS ET CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F12A Equip. ClassEquipment Description MCC F12AStatusG)N u

l. Motor Control CentersInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduit rigidly supported to backwall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A X X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) This 8 section MCC is adjacent to MCC FI4 ond MCC Fl5. These MCCs were opened and inspected. It was verffied that theseMCCsareboltedtogether. AtthesouthendofthisMCC,thereisal.5"gaptopanelCDFl2A-l,whichisjudged acceptable to preclude pounding.Evaluated bv: 7/25/2012 p' ,) //( , J --4.-/ti-{h,',RJ/ Eddie M. Guerra tt ,.r,j / ,i' / ,t /, :)d?,':?'t /-", )/,!ri"//Y Adam L. Helffrich 7t25t2012 Sheet 179 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.ENGINEERS &. CONSUUTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)status(?)N u Equipment ID No. FlzAEquipment Description Equip. Class MCC FI2A l. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Fl2A plate ID Plate of component F l2A general General view of component Sheet I 80 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUT-TANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2A Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC FlzAl. Motor Control Centers Fl2A stitch weld Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors StatusG)N u Sheet l8l of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS S{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Fl2D Equip. Class l. Motor control Centersstatu{T)N u Equipment DescriptionMCC FI2D Location: Bldg. INTK Floor El. 576 Room 52 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? This a single section MCC welded to embedwith an overage of 9" of 3/l6" fillet welds atfront and back.No degraded conditionfound around cabinet base.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No significant craclts identified around cabinet mounting base.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Since cabinet could not be opened, configuration is verified basedon SQUG calculotion C-CSS-F12D. This calculation evaluates anchorage based on calculation C-CSS-EL2C which conlcudes anchorage configuration is adequate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Outlier close out note (C-CSS-FI2D, page 7 of 7) indicates comparisonw/ El2Chas shown anchorage is adequate. Anchorage is also checked with section L of dratuing C-041 28 and confirmed to be consistent with walkdown inspection. N X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Equipment ID No. Fl2DEquipment Description Sheet Equip. Class l. Motor Control MCC F12DInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Potential interaction hazard due to near byfire extinguishers without adequate wallfixity. It was agreed thal no significant effect expected during seismic event.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 182 of 379 Status0N U Centers N/A N/AOther Adverse Conditions1l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra',, i /.i /t"/.r/ir1,7r/ rz'/,'r//, iW Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 83 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS C'. CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. F l2D Equip. Class Equipment Description MCC Fl2D Fl2D plate ID Plate of component Fl2D anchorage Mounting base detail with embedded channel Status(?)N ul. Motor Control CentersOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): FlzD general General view of component Potential interaction hazard from fire extinguisherin the vicinity of component.F I 2D fire ext to right PCePaul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANJTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062 Equip. ClassEquipment Description FIRE DAMPER FD Sheet 184 of379statuf)N u0. Other r062Location: Bldg. AUXB Floor El. 603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchorageL Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Component attached to ceiling and braced to wall with HSS sections.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Damper vertical supports connected to upper floor decking behueen ribs.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Damperfound adequately supported against laterol movement HS'S sections found in adequate condition. No signs of corrosion observed on support members. N/A X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062 Equip. ClassFIRE DAMPER FD Sheet0. OtherEquipment Description 1062 Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution and masonry block walls not likely to systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Electric line c onnec te d w ith adequate flexib ility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 185of 379 StatusGlN uOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra , rii*C /*':',rU.

,'r

" Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 86 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS C( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FDl062 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment DescriptionFIRE DAMPER FD 1062 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): FDl062 General view of component Status(?)N u FDl062 anchorage View of anchorage PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.EA*CiINEERS &

CONSUITAIITSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIS l612 Equip. Class EquipmentDescription SFPHX l FIS-I612 Sheet 187 of379 Status*)N u 20. Instrument and Control Panels Cool Water Outlet Flow Indicatine SwitchLocation: Bldg. AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Floor El. 590'6"Room 312 Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Floor mounted rackfound in adequate condition anchoredwith 4-1/2" diam bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No signs of corrosionfound on anchor bolts and bottom-l/2" plate.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks on groutfor bottom plate anchorage.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Anchor spacing to adjacent floor mounted rack is judged adequate.N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X pc-'te Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCINEI.RS & CONSI,ILTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIS 1612 Equip. ClassEquipment Description SFP HX I FIS-1612 Sheet 20. Instrument and Control Panels Cool Water Outlet Flow IndicatineInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verified to be to be seismically adequatebased on ref. VBWL6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) and VBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible line and small piping were identified with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X X X X 188 of 379Status(T)N u Switch N/AOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guema i{r:#'// //.,/' . i;2.i/,r,,./i Adam L. Helffrich Sheet I 89 of 379ENGINEERS & CONSIJLTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels SFP FD( I FIS- 1612 Cool Water Outlet Flow Indicating Switch FIS 1612 plate ID Plate of component FI S 1612 general General view of component Status@N U Equipment ID No. FIS 1612Equipment Description Sheet 190 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FIs 1612 Equip. class 20. Instrument and control Panels Equipment DescriptionSFP HX I FIS-1612 Cool Water Outlet Flow Indicating Switch FIS 1612 anchorage View of anchorage FIS 1612 adjacent masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unitStatus/?)N U PC)e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, [nc. ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3CLocation: Bldg. AUXB Floor El.565 Room 208Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completin g Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 5Ao/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mounted on tube section 6x6 which is attached to concrete wall withfour 1/2" diameter anchors. The lightweight transmitter (<-20 lbs) is attached to the rackwithfour 3/8" diameter machine bolts. OK.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Supporting wall tubesfound in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No signs of coruosionfound on mounting support and piping4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? No cracks identified on wall near flow transmitter.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet l9l of379 Status9 N U X X N/A X X X X PCe PauI c. Rizzo Associates, [nc.Eir-CINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on)Equipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3C SheetInteraction Effects 7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Small piping connected to transmitter found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No potential interaction identified on the vicinity of component.

X X X X 192of 379 Statusfi)N u Racks 712512012 X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that couldfunctions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Pipe lines rigidly attached to containment wall. No adverse fficts due to dffirential motion are expected. Evaluated bv: Eddie M. GuerraAdam L. Helffrich Sheet 193 of 379Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE,RS,& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FTHP3CEquip. Class

18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriptionFLOW TRANSMITTER FT HP3C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Status@N U FTHP3CID Plate of component FTHP3C General General view of component pce Paul C.Rizz-o Asso-ciates, [nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSU1TANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV645l Equip. Class SOLENOID VALVE Sheet 194 of379Status:$ U

88. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description AF645l Location:

Bldg. AUXB Floor El.Room 238 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Installed on a 4" diameter pipe line.2. ls the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Valve and main pipe line found with no signs of corrosion.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Main pipe line adequatelly supported. No excessive unsupported lengths identffied. 565 X X X X X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.ENGINEERS & CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV645l Equip. ClassSheet 195 of379Status0N U8B. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description SOLENOID VALVE AF645IInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No blockwalls or potential interaction hazard identified in the area.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Lines connected with adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NiA X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment? X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 7/2512012 Adam L. Helffrich 7/2st20r2 Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS Cl CONSUTiTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status(?)N uEquipment ID No. FV645l Equipment Description Equip. Class 88. Solenoid ValvesSOLENOID VALVE AF645I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FV-6451 PlateID Plate of component FV-6451 General2General view of component 196 of 379 Sheet 197 of379Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Status:ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452 Equip. Class

88. Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.

AUXBSOLENOID VALVE AF6452 Floor El.565 Room 237Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Mounted on pipe line spannig around l}ft.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?Valve and pipe line found with good surface condition and no signs of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X pc-\e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452 Equip. Class 88. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description SOLENOID VALVE AF6452 Sheet 198 of379Statusfi\N uInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with adequate flexibiliy.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: 7125/2012 Eddie M. Guerra ,r! / /,),,r) 'lt. i/L.:,,/ ,/r rr /n,'/,{1,, 7/2s/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Sheet 199 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTSSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FV6452 Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment Description SOLENOID VALVE 4F6452Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):FV645 2 general General view of component Status@N U PCe Paul C. Rizzo As-sociates, [nc. ENCTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 200 of 319 Status:QN USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 5889A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description AFP TURB 1-l STEAM INLET VALVE inside PNL C5709 Location: Bldg. AUXBFloor El. 623 Room 505 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. Anchorage l Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Inside Panel C5709, which has similar anchorage to Panel C5702.Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with4-l/2" screws.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? None observed.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? None observed.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? X X X X X X PCeIo:l:lER'SJ::c", ""t"r"', h..Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HIS 58894' Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment DescriptionAFP TURB l-l STEAM INLET VALVE inside PNL C5709 Sheet 201 of 379 Status:ON U Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N/A N/A X X X XOther Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: 7/25/2012 Eddie M. Guerra't /' ./, i .r/.,r/'t':/ b,t/2 1"t{/.t 7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich}}