ML060950370

2006/03/22-GALL AMP: XI.M15, Neutron Noise Monitoring (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)

ML060950370
Person / Time
Site:	Vermont Yankee
Issue date:	03/22/2006
From:	Morgan M J NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
morgan M J NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232
Shared Package
ML060950189	List: ML060950195 ML060950215 ML060950218 ML060950220 ML060950224 ML060950235 ML060950250 ML060950258 ML060950262 ML060950269 ML060950271 ML060950277 ML060950279 ML060950284 ML060950290 ML060950301 ML060950311 ML060950323 ML060950328 ML060950331 ML060950347 ML060950351 ML060950356 ML060950364 ML060950370 ML060950372 ML060950375 ML060950540 ML060950549 ML060950559 ML060950567 ML060950570 ML060950573 ML060950579 ML060950582 ML060950587 ML060950596 ML060950606 ML060950610 ML060950620 ML060950624 ML060950629 ML060950632 ML060950634 ML060950637 ML060950645 ML061000078 ML061000090 ML061000096 ML061000101 ... further results
References
%dam200611, TAC MC9668
Download: ML060950370 (10)

Text

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 1 AUDIT W ORKSHEET GALL R EPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________

LRA AMP: __________________________

R EVIEWER: ______________________

GALL AMP: XI.M15, Neutron Noise Monitoring DATE: __________________________

Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Program Description A. The program relies on monitoring the excore neutron detector signals due to core motion to detect and monitor significant loss of axial preload at the core support barrel's upper support flange in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This inservice monitoring program is based on the recommendations from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers operation and maintenance standards and guides (ASME OM-S/G)-1997, Part 5, "Inservice Monitoring of Core Support Barrel Axial Preload in Pressurized Water Reactors Power Plants." Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: 1. Scope of Program A. The program includes measures to monitor and detect loss of axial preload (loss of axial restraint) at the core support barrel's upper support flange in PWRs. The loss of axial restraint may arise from long-term changes resulting from abnormal wear at the reactor vessel core barrel mating surface or short-term changes due to improper installation of the reactor internals. The program also includes guidelines for further data acquisition that may be needed to define future plant operation and/or program plans in order to maintain the capability of the structure/components to perform the intended function. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment 2. Preventive Actions A. The program is a monitoring/detection program that provides early indication and detection of the onset of aging degradation of the core support barrelhold-down mechanism prior to a scheduled shutdown, thus reducing outage time and avoiding potential damage to the core support barrel and fuel assemblies. The AMP does not rely on preventive actions. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 2 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding 3. Parameters Monitored/ Inspected A. The program relies on the use of excore neutron detector signals to provide information on the conditions of the axial preload. The excore neutron flux signal is composed of a steady state, direct current (DC) component that arises from the neutron flux produced by the power operation of the reactor, as well as a fluctuating (noise-like) component. This fluctuating signal arises from the core reactivity changes due to lateral core motion from the loss of axial preload. This core motion is mainly the result of beam mode vibration of the core support barrel. Despite the fact that this beam mode vibration provides only a very weak neutron noise source, it may be reliably detected and identified through Fourier Analysis of the fluctuating signal component of the excore neutron flux signal. This signal component has the characteristics of having 180-degree shifts and a high degree of coherence between signals obtained from pairs of excore neutron detectors that are positioned on diametrically opposite sides of the core. The neutron noise signals are characterized by parameters, which include the auto correlation, cross correlation, coherence, and phase. These parameters are to be monitored and evaluated. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: 4. Detection of Aging Effects A. Flow-induced vibration of the core support barrel will change the thickness of the downcomer annulus (water gap). This variation in the thickness will give rise to fluctuating changes in the neutron flux, as monitored by the excore neutron detectors. The natural frequencies and the amplitudes of the vibratory motion of the core barrel are related to the effective axial preload at the upper support flange of the core support barrel. Monitoring of the neutron noise signal obtained with the neutron flux detectors located around the external periphery of the reactor vessel provides detection of anomalous vibrational motion of the core support barrel, and hence significant loss of the axial preload. Decrease in the axial preload leads to decreases in the core support barrel beam mode frequency and an increase in the magnitude of the noise signal. The overall Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 3 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding effect of a decrease in the axial preload is to shift the neutron noise power spectrum toward larger amplitudes for the lower frequency region. 5. Monitoring and Trending A. The neutron noise random fluctuation in the signals from the excore detectors are monitored, recorded, and analyzed to identify changes in the beam mode natural frequency of the core support barrel and its direction of motion for the purpose of a timely determination of the need and urgency for a detailed inspection and examination of the reactor vessel internals hold-down mechanism and mating component surfaces. These activities and analytical methodology are performed, and associated personnel are qualified, in accordance with site-controlled procedures and processes as indicated by vendor, industry, or regulatory guidance documents. The neutron noise monitoring program has three separate phases: a baseline phase, a surveillance phase, and a diagnostic phase. The baseline phase establishes the database to be used as a reference for developing limits and trends in the surveillance phase and to support data evaluation and interpretation in the diagnostic phase. During the baseline phase, data on the time history and DC level of each neutron flux detector and each cross-core detector pair are obtained.

From this database, the characteristic amplitudes and frequencies of the core barrel motion are extracted. The wide and narrow frequency bands with their associated normalized root mean square (NRMS) values are established. The ASME-OMS/G-1997, Part 5, recommends collecting the baseline data during the first fuel cycle that the neutron noise monitoring program is applied to an already operating plant. Whenever Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 4 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding significant changes takes place for the core, reactor internals, or operating conditions, additional baseline data is obtained. " B. In the surveillance phase, routine neutron noise monitoring of normal plant operations is performed over the life of the plant. The DC level and data for frequency analysis of each detector and two pair of cross-core detectors, may be collected. Comparisons of the measured amplitude and frequency data, with limits established from the baseline data, are made. In using neutron noise monitoring, accounts are taken of the effect of core burn-up, decreasing boron concentration, changes in fuel management, and in-core contact with the reactor vessel mechanical snubbers, which may affect the neutron noise signatures. Proper allowances for these factors during the baseline and surveillance phases will help toward detecting loss of axial preload before the core barrel becomes sufficiently free to wear against the reactor vessel and will also reduce the need to invoke the diagnostic phase. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: " C. If the diagnostic phase becomes necessary, then evaluations are carried out to establish whether any deviations from the baseline data detected during the surveillance phase arises from core barrel motion due to loss of axial preload. The need and frequency of additional data collection on the time history and DC level of each neutron flux detector and each cross-core detector pair collection are guided by the results of these evaluations. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 5 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding 6. Acceptance Criteria A. If evaluation of the baseline data indicates normal operation for the applicable structure/component, the surveillance phase may commence. If evaluation indicates anomalous behavior, the monitoring program enters the diagnostic phase. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: " B. During the surveillance phase, if deviations from the baseline fall within predetermined acceptable limits, the surveillance will continue. Otherwise, the diagnostic phase will commence. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: 7. Corrective Actions A. Initial results from the diagnostic phase of the program may be used to determine whether there is a need to increase the minimum frequency with which the surveillance data are acquired. In addition, if necessary, corrective actions may be taken to change the type of data acquisition and analysis from that previously recommended for the surveillance part of the program. The data trends may be established to guide further data acquisition that may be needed to define future plant operation and/or program plans. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: 8.

Confirmation Process A. Site quality assurance (QA) procedures, review and approval processes, and administrative controls are implemented in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the confirmation process and administrative controls. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment: 9.

Administrative Controls A. See Item 8, above. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 6 Program Element Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Comment: 10. Operating Experience A. The neutron noise monitoring program and procedures were developed by the industry and published as a guide in ASME OM-S/G-1997, Part 5, an American National Standard. This monitoring program and procedures have been effective in limited industry use for monitoring and detecting loss of core support barrel axial preload in PWR power plants. Consistent with GALL AMP:

Yes No Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

XI.M15 Neutron Noise Monitoring 7 EXCEPTIONS Item Number Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2. -

ENHANCEMENTS Item Number Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #) 1. 2. -

DOCUMENT REVIEWED D URING A UDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1. 2. 3. 4. -.