ML102230125: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
of Allowables (RMS) ............................................ | of Allowables (RMS) ............................................ | ||
35 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Short Form Description ACM Acoustic Circuit Methodology ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers CLTP Current License Thermal Power (Formerly 3489 MWth)EPU Extended Power Uprate FE Finite Element FIV Flow Induced Vibration Hz Hertz (Cycles per Second)HPCI High Pressure Coolant Injection LCF Limit Curve Factor Mlbm/hr Millions Pound-Mass per Hour MSL Main Steam Line MWth Mega-Watts | 35 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Short Form Description ACM Acoustic Circuit Methodology ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers CLTP Current License Thermal Power (Formerly 3489 MWth)EPU Extended Power Uprate FE Finite Element FIV Flow Induced Vibration Hz Hertz (Cycles per Second)HPCI High Pressure Coolant Injection LCF Limit Curve Factor Mlbm/hr Millions Pound-Mass per Hour MSL Main Steam Line MWth Mega-Watts | ||
-Thermal OLTP Original License Thermal Power (3293 MWth)PSD Power Spectral Density RCIC Reactor Core Isolation Cooling RHR Residual Heat Removal RMS Root Mean Square RWCU Reactor Water Clean-Up SRV Safety Relief Valve (Main Steam)VPF Vane Passing Frequency 1.0 Executive Summary This report provides a summary of the SSES Unit 1 replacement steam dryer monitoring instrumentation (Main Steam Line Strain Gage) and flow induced vibration (FIV)measurements at the targeted 114.0% CLTP test plateau (3952 MWth). This data was collected at the actual power levels and core flows indicated in Table 1: Table 1: Power/Core Flow Data Collection Conditions Test Point Thermal Power MWth Core Flow (Mlbm/hrl 1 3948 102.0 2 3948 99.8 3 3916 106.3 The main steam line (MSL) strain gage locations are documented in Reference | -Thermal OLTP Original License Thermal Power (3293 MWth)PSD Power Spectral Density RCIC Reactor Core Isolation Cooling RHR Residual Heat Removal RMS Root Mean Square RWCU Reactor Water Clean-Up SRV Safety Relief Valve (Main Steam)VPF Vane Passing Frequency | ||
===1.0 Executive=== | |||
Summary This report provides a summary of the SSES Unit 1 replacement steam dryer monitoring instrumentation (Main Steam Line Strain Gage) and flow induced vibration (FIV)measurements at the targeted 114.0% CLTP test plateau (3952 MWth). This data was collected at the actual power levels and core flows indicated in Table 1: Table 1: Power/Core Flow Data Collection Conditions Test Point Thermal Power MWth Core Flow (Mlbm/hrl 1 3948 102.0 2 3948 99.8 3 3916 106.3 The main steam line (MSL) strain gage locations are documented in Reference | |||
: 1. Plant data log sheets for each Table 1 test point is contained in Appendix A. The data log sheets provide a record of plant conditions at these power conditions. | : 1. Plant data log sheets for each Table 1 test point is contained in Appendix A. The data log sheets provide a record of plant conditions at these power conditions. | ||
The MSL strain gage data indicates that sufficient steam dryer margin (2)}}} to the ASME endurance limit of 13,600 PSI exists. This data supports and validates the final steam dryer stress assessment documented in Reference | The MSL strain gage data indicates that sufficient steam dryer margin (2)}}} to the ASME endurance limit of 13,600 PSI exists. This data supports and validates the final steam dryer stress assessment documented in Reference | ||
Line 139: | Line 143: | ||
: 4. These monitoring curves provide guidance for evaluating the measured dryer response with respect to the structural analysis results.Table 5 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 102 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 1) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth (110.5% CLTP) @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain were below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 1 through 8.Table 5: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 102.0 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 1)Table 6 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm./hr (Test Point 2) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr (114%CLTP). { {{Page 3 | : 4. These monitoring curves provide guidance for evaluating the measured dryer response with respect to the structural analysis results.Table 5 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 102 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 1) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth (110.5% CLTP) @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain were below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 1 through 8.Table 5: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 102.0 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 1)Table 6 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm./hr (Test Point 2) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr (114%CLTP). { {{Page 3 | ||
.(2)} } } The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 9 through 16.Table 6: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 2)(2}}}Table 7 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 3) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at and 3948 MWth (114%CLTP) @ 102 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain are below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 17 through 24.Table 7: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 3)After reaching 100% power, a stress evaluation was conducted using the F-Factor and RMS methodology documented in Reference 3 and Reference | .(2)} } } The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 9 through 16.Table 6: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 2)(2}}}Table 7 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 3) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at and 3948 MWth (114%CLTP) @ 102 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain are below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 17 through 24.Table 7: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 3)After reaching 100% power, a stress evaluation was conducted using the F-Factor and RMS methodology documented in Reference 3 and Reference | ||
: 4. The results of that analysis are documented in Section 2.3 below and in Tables 8 through 10. {{{(2)}}}Page 4 2.2 Trending For trending purposes, filtered MSL strain gage PSDs for powers up to 114.0% of CLTP (3952 MWth) have been plotted in a waterfall format and are presented in Figures 25 through 32. Figure 33 is a trend plot of the RMS value of the sample time histories plotted against total steam flow. Figures 25 through 33 show that MSL strains are M{ .12)}}}MSL strain gages mounted on the A and D steam lines have the highest magnitude readings. | : 4. The results of that analysis are documented in Section 2.3 below and in Tables 8 through 10. {{{(2)}}}Page 4 | ||
===2.2 Trending=== | |||
For trending purposes, filtered MSL strain gage PSDs for powers up to 114.0% of CLTP (3952 MWth) have been plotted in a waterfall format and are presented in Figures 25 through 32. Figure 33 is a trend plot of the RMS value of the sample time histories plotted against total steam flow. Figures 25 through 33 show that MSL strains are M{ .12)}}}MSL strain gages mounted on the A and D steam lines have the highest magnitude readings. | |||
This is attributed to the 15 Hz peak being reinforced by the safety relief valve (SRV) dead-legs on these two steam lines, as discussed in References 5 and Reference 6.The Unit 1 MSL strain gage PSDs measured at 3948 MWth are similar to the PSDs measured on Unit 1 3733 MWth in frequency content and with the anticipated magnitude increase. | This is attributed to the 15 Hz peak being reinforced by the safety relief valve (SRV) dead-legs on these two steam lines, as discussed in References 5 and Reference 6.The Unit 1 MSL strain gage PSDs measured at 3948 MWth are similar to the PSDs measured on Unit 1 3733 MWth in frequency content and with the anticipated magnitude increase. | ||
Figures 34 through 41 show Unit 1 data plotted at 3733 MWth and 3948 MWth.An examination of Figures 34 through 41 demonstrates that the acoustic signatures are similar.2.3 Unit 1 Steam Dryer Stress Estimates As an additional analysis of the acoustic data generated by Unit 1, an F-Factor and RMS analyses (as described in Reference 3 and Reference | Figures 34 through 41 show Unit 1 data plotted at 3733 MWth and 3948 MWth.An examination of Figures 34 through 41 demonstrates that the acoustic signatures are similar.2.3 Unit 1 Steam Dryer Stress Estimates As an additional analysis of the acoustic data generated by Unit 1, an F-Factor and RMS analyses (as described in Reference 3 and Reference | ||
Line 154: | Line 161: | ||
Significant electrical noise occurred on the extraction steam system piping at the 60 Hz multiples of the power supply frequencies. | Significant electrical noise occurred on the extraction steam system piping at the 60 Hz multiples of the power supply frequencies. | ||
The application of notch filters was required.Multiples of the reactor recirculation pump vane passing frequency (VPF) were observed;however, the VPF frequencies were not filtered, since they represent true mechanical vibration (i.e., displacement/stress). | The application of notch filters was required.Multiples of the reactor recirculation pump vane passing frequency (VPF) were observed;however, the VPF frequencies were not filtered, since they represent true mechanical vibration (i.e., displacement/stress). | ||
Page 8 3.4 Results Throughout power ascension no accelerometers degraded to the point where their output was judged to be questionable (i.e., a "near zero" output). Figures 42 through 44 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus total main steam flow/feed water flow trends during the power ascension to 3952 MWth. In addition, Figures 45 through 49 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus core flow trends for the Reactor Recirculation, RHR, and RWCU system instruments. | Page 8 | ||
===3.4 Results=== | |||
Throughout power ascension no accelerometers degraded to the point where their output was judged to be questionable (i.e., a "near zero" output). Figures 42 through 44 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus total main steam flow/feed water flow trends during the power ascension to 3952 MWth. In addition, Figures 45 through 49 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus core flow trends for the Reactor Recirculation, RHR, and RWCU system instruments. | |||
The walk downs were performed for piping and components located in accessible and inaccessible (i.e., high radiation) areas. As expected, the vibration observed increased with power ascension. | The walk downs were performed for piping and components located in accessible and inaccessible (i.e., high radiation) areas. As expected, the vibration observed increased with power ascension. | ||
All observed vibration was within previously established acceptance criteria.At the 106.3 Mlbm/hr core flow (Test Point 3) one accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system and 2 accelerometers on the RHR system (see Figures 45 and 49)exceeded their conservative Level 2 RMS limits but were within the Zero-to-Peak pre-established Level 2 limits. This ensures that the ASME OM-3 allowable stresses for vibration were met.A second accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system exceeded both its Level 2 RMS allowable and its Level 2 Zero-to-Peak allowable values (see VE16730 on Figure 45). The increase in steam and feed water flows does not affect the Reactor Recirculation and RHR system piping vibration but Reactor core flow rates do directly affect vibration levels on these systems. There was no Level 1 piping vibration limits for these piping systems. A condition report in the Susquehanna corrective action program evaluated and tracked this condition. | All observed vibration was within previously established acceptance criteria.At the 106.3 Mlbm/hr core flow (Test Point 3) one accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system and 2 accelerometers on the RHR system (see Figures 45 and 49)exceeded their conservative Level 2 RMS limits but were within the Zero-to-Peak pre-established Level 2 limits. This ensures that the ASME OM-3 allowable stresses for vibration were met.A second accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system exceeded both its Level 2 RMS allowable and its Level 2 Zero-to-Peak allowable values (see VE16730 on Figure 45). The increase in steam and feed water flows does not affect the Reactor Recirculation and RHR system piping vibration but Reactor core flow rates do directly affect vibration levels on these systems. There was no Level 1 piping vibration limits for these piping systems. A condition report in the Susquehanna corrective action program evaluated and tracked this condition. | ||
Condition Report 1270880 determined that the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable. | Condition Report 1270880 determined that the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable. | ||
3.5 Piping Summary During the Unit 1 power ascension to 3952 MWth, piping vibration levels were monitored to assess effects of flow-induced vibration (FIV). Trending was performed, and all accelerations/displacements were within pre-established limits, based on ASME OM-3 allowable stresses with the exception of the one Reactor Recirculation instrument at a core flow of 106.3 Mlbm/hr mentioned above. After additional analysis, the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable by 31%.The piping/components walks down results were as expected; general vibration levels increased during power ascension but the overall response of piping and components were within established criteria.Page 9 4.0 | |||
===3.5 Piping=== | |||
Summary During the Unit 1 power ascension to 3952 MWth, piping vibration levels were monitored to assess effects of flow-induced vibration (FIV). Trending was performed, and all accelerations/displacements were within pre-established limits, based on ASME OM-3 allowable stresses with the exception of the one Reactor Recirculation instrument at a core flow of 106.3 Mlbm/hr mentioned above. After additional analysis, the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable by 31%.The piping/components walks down results were as expected; general vibration levels increased during power ascension but the overall response of piping and components were within established criteria.Page 9 4.0 | |||
==References:== | ==References:== |
Revision as of 02:40, 14 October 2018
ML102230125 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Susquehanna |
Issue date: | 07/15/2010 |
From: | Rausch T S Susquehanna |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
PLA-6633, TAC MD3309, TAC MD3310 | |
Download: ML102230125 (70) | |
Text
Timothy S. Rausch Sr. Vice President
& Chief Nuclear Officer PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3445 Fax 570.542.1504 tsrausch@pplweb.com PP JUL 1 5 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Stop OP1-17 Washington, DC 20555"rM SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT 1 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-14 LICENSE CONDITIONS 2.C.(36)(a)3, 2.C.(36)(b)7 and 2.C.(36)(f)
PLA-6633 Docket No 50-387 Reference.
1.) Letter, R. V. Guzman (NRC) to B. T. McKinney (PPL), "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 -Issuance ofAmendment Regarding the 13-Percent Extended Power Uprate (TAC Nos. MD3309 and MD3310), "dated January 30, 2008.2.) Email, D. L. Filchner (PPL) to R. V Guzman (NRC), "Susquehanna Unit 1 Dryer Report Ready for Download from PPL File Transfer Center ", dated May 31, 2010.3.) Email, R. V. Guzman (NRC) to D. L. Filchner (PPL), "Susquehanna Unit 1 EPU Power Ascension, Review of Data Package re: Steam Dryer Performance at 107 and 110.5%", dated June 3, 2010.The purpose of this letter is to provide notification that Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) Unit 1 license conditions 2.C.(36)(a)3, 2.C.(36)(b)7, and 2.C.(36)(f), established in Reference 1, have been met.On May 31, 2010 PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL) submitted the SSES Unit 1 Steam Dryer Report for NRC evaluation of steam dryer performance (Reference
- 2) based on data collected at the 3.5% power ascension step corresponding to 110.5% CLTP, as required by license condition 2.C.(36)(a)(3).
NRC review of this information (Reference 3)concluded that ascension to the full EPU power level (3952 MWt) was acceptable.
Accordingly, license condition 2.C.(36)(a)3 has been met.Enclosure 1 contains the PPL proprietary version of "SSES Replacement Steam Dryer and Flow Induced Vibration Report -Unit 1 Start-Up 114% Power Test Plateau" which is the written evaluation of steam dryer performance.
This evaluation is based on data collected during SSES Unit 1 power ascension to the full Extended Power Uprate (EPU)operating conditions at 3952 MWt (114% CLTP), in accordance with SSES Unit 1 license condition 2.C.(36)(b)7. DocumentControl Desk PLA-6633 The evaluation of data collected demonstrates that the new SSES steam dryer design possesses sufficient structural margin to the steam dryer ASME endurance limit of 13,600 PSI for continued power operation at 3952 MWt and therefore license condition 2.C.(36)(b)7 has been met.The report also includes a summary of the results of piping and component walk down results. General vibration levels increased during power ascension as expected, and the overall response of piping and components remained within established criteria.Enclosure 2 contains the non-proprietary version of the "SSES Replacement Steam Dryer and Flow Induced Vibration Report -Unit 1 Start-Up 114% Power Test Plateau" evaluation results discussed above.Enclosure 3 provides the results of the steam dryer visual inspections conducted during the SSES Unit 1 16th Refueling and Inspection outage. These results meet the intent of SSES Unit 1 license condition 2.C.(36)f.
Additionally, SSES Unit 1 license condition 2.C.(36)(e) requires that visual inspections be conducted of all accessible, susceptible locations of the steam dryer. These future inspections will be performed in each of the next two SSES Unit 1 refueling outages in 2012 and 2014 in accordance with this license condition.
The information contained in Enclosure 1 is proprietary as defined by 1 OCFR2.3 90.Therefore, PPL, as the owner of the proprietary information, has executed the enclosed affidavit (Enclosure 4), which identifies that the enclosed proprietary information has been handled and classified as proprietary, is customarily held in confidence, and has been withheld from public disclosure.
The proprietary information has been faithfully reproduced in the enclosed information such that the affidavit remains applicable.
PPL hereby requests that the proprietary information in Enclosure 1 be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.390 and 9.17.The header of each page in Enclosure 1 carries the notation "PPL Proprietary Information." PPL proprietary information is identified inside triple brackets.{ { {This sentence is an example. {2} } } In each case, the superscript notation 12} refers to Paragraph (2) of the PPL affidavit, which provides the basis for the proprietary determination.
Specific information that is not so marked is not PPL proprietary.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Duane L. Filchner at (610) 774-7819. Document Control Desk PLA-6633 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on: "_________
T. S. Rausch Enclosure 1 -"SSES Replacement Dryer and Flow Induced Vibration Report, Unit 1 Start-up, 114% Power Test Plateau" -PPL Proprietary Information Enclosure 2 -"SSES Replacement Dryer and Flow Induced Vibration Report, Unit 1 Start-up, 114% Power Test Plateau" -Non-Proprietary Information Enclosure 3 -"Unit 1 License Condition 2.C.(36)(f)
Steam Dryer Inspection Results" Enclosure 4 -Affidavit Copy: NRC Region I Mr. R. R. Janati, DEP/BRP Mr. P. W. Finney, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. B. K. Vaidya, NRC Project Manager Enclosure 2 to PLA-6633 Non -Proprietary Version of "SSES Replacement Dryer and. Flow Induced Vibration Report, Unit 1 Start-up, 114% Power Test Plateau" IL is41?L~IIM SSES Replacement Steam Dryer and Flow Induced Vibration Report Unit 1 Start-Up 114.0% Power Test Plateau July 2010 Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved by: John A. Bartos Kevin G. Browning John E. Krais TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 E xecutive Sum m ary ..........................................................................................
1 2.0 Main Steam Line Strain Gage Data Analysis ...........................................
1 2.1 Power Spectral Density ...............................................................
1 2.2 T ren ding ...........................................................................................
5 2.3 Unit 1 Steam Dryer Stress Estimates
......................................
5 2.4 Steam Dryer Evaluation Summary ...........................................
7 3.0 Piping Flow Induced Vibration
...............................................................
7 3.1 Introduction
.....................................................................................
7 3.2 Data Collection Scope ..................................................................
8 3.3 Data Analysis Methodology
.........................................................
8 3.4 R esults ...............................................................................................
..9 3.5 Piping Summary ..............................................................................
9 4.0 R eferences
....................................................................................................
10 Appendix A -Plant Data Log Sheets ...............................................................
36 i LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Power/Core Flow Data Collection Conditions
...........................................................
1 Table 2: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 102.0 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 1) ..............
2 Table 3: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 99.8 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 2) ...............
2 Table 4: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 106.3 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 3) ..............
2 Table 5: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 102.0 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 1) ...............................
3 Table 6: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 2) ..............................
4 Table 7: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 3) ..............................
4 Table 8: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF ACM Analysis F-Factor M ethod .............................................................................
6 Table 9: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF Supplemental Analysis F-Factor M ethod ...............................................................
6 Table 10: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF Supplemental Analysis RM S M ethod ......................................................................
7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 ............................................
11 Figure 2: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 ............................................
11 Figure 3: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 ........................................
12 Figure 4: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 .................................
12 Figure 5: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 .....................................
13 Figure 6: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 .......................................
13 Figure 7: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 ..................................
14 Figure 8: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 .......................................
14 Figure 9: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 ........................................
15 Figure 10: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 .....................................
15 Figure 11: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 ...................................
16 Figure 12: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 ......................................
16 Figure 13: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 ......................................
17 Figure 14: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 .....................................
17 Figure 15: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 ......................................
18 Figure 16: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 .....................................
18 Figure 17: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 ......................................
19 Figure 18: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 .....................................
19 Figure 19: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 .................................
20 Figure 20: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 ....................................
20 Figure 21: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 .....................................
21 Figure 22: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 .....................................
21 Figure 23: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 ......................................
22 Figure 24: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 .....................................
22 Figure 25: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot .........................................
23 Figure 26: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot ............................................
23 Figure 27: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot .......................
24 Figure 28: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot ............................................
24 Figure 29: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot .......................
25 Figure 30: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot ...............................................
25 Figure 31: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot ...............................................
26 Figure 32: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot ...............................................
26 LIST OF FIGURES (cont'd.)Figure 33: Figure 34: Figure 35: Figure 36: Figure 37: Figure 38: Figure 39: Figure 40: Figure 41: Figure 42: Figure 43: Figure 44: Figure 45: Figure 46: Figure 47: Figure 48: Figure 49: MSL Strain Gage Time History RMS Trends ..................................................
27 MSL A Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
.................................
28 MSL A Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
.................................
28 MSL B Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
...................................
29 MSL B Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
.................................
29 MSL C Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
..................................
30 MSL C Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
.................................
30 MSL D Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
..................................
31 MSL D Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison
.................................
31 Main Steam Line 'B' Piping -% of Allowables (RMS) .................................
32 Main Steam Line 'C' Piping -% of Allowables (RMS) .................................
32 Feedwater Piping -% of Allowables (RM S) ....................................................
33 Reactor Recirculation
'A' Loop Piping -% of Allowables (RMS) ................
33 RHR 'A' Loop Inside Containment Piping -% of Allowables (RMS) ..........
34 Reactor Recirculation
'B' and RHR 'B' Loop Inside Containment Piping ....... 34 RHR HV151FO15A
& B Valves (Outside Containment)%
of Allowables (RMS) ............................................
35 RHR HV151FO17A
& B Valves (Outside Containment)%
of Allowables (RMS) ............................................
35 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Short Form Description ACM Acoustic Circuit Methodology ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers CLTP Current License Thermal Power (Formerly 3489 MWth)EPU Extended Power Uprate FE Finite Element FIV Flow Induced Vibration Hz Hertz (Cycles per Second)HPCI High Pressure Coolant Injection LCF Limit Curve Factor Mlbm/hr Millions Pound-Mass per Hour MSL Main Steam Line MWth Mega-Watts
-Thermal OLTP Original License Thermal Power (3293 MWth)PSD Power Spectral Density RCIC Reactor Core Isolation Cooling RHR Residual Heat Removal RMS Root Mean Square RWCU Reactor Water Clean-Up SRV Safety Relief Valve (Main Steam)VPF Vane Passing Frequency
1.0 Executive
Summary This report provides a summary of the SSES Unit 1 replacement steam dryer monitoring instrumentation (Main Steam Line Strain Gage) and flow induced vibration (FIV)measurements at the targeted 114.0% CLTP test plateau (3952 MWth). This data was collected at the actual power levels and core flows indicated in Table 1: Table 1: Power/Core Flow Data Collection Conditions Test Point Thermal Power MWth Core Flow (Mlbm/hrl 1 3948 102.0 2 3948 99.8 3 3916 106.3 The main steam line (MSL) strain gage locations are documented in Reference
- 1. Plant data log sheets for each Table 1 test point is contained in Appendix A. The data log sheets provide a record of plant conditions at these power conditions.
The MSL strain gage data indicates that sufficient steam dryer margin (2)} to the ASME endurance limit of 13,600 PSI exists. This data supports and validates the final steam dryer stress assessment documented in Reference
- 2. The analysis of the piping accelerometer FIV data confirms that there is adequate margin{{{ (2)} } } to the ASME limits in the SSES main steam, feed water, extraction steam, and HPCI steam supply system piping. The reactor recirculation, RHR, and RWCU system piping also are within ASME limits.2.0 Main Steam Line Strain Gage Data Analysis 2.1 Power Spectral Density Figures 1 through 32 provide power spectral density (PSD) plots of MSL strain gage readings.
The level 1 and level 2 monitoring curves for each strain gage location are also plotted on Figures 1 through 24. The strain values represent average strain values observed over a 180 second test time period. A data-sampling rate of 2500 Hz was used in the data processing. The test data was band-pass filtered between 3 and 250 Hz to be consistent with the load definition used in the replacement dryer structural analysis in Reference
- 2. There is substantial noise from the 60 Hz alternating current and the recirculation pump power supply, thus filtering of this electrical noise was performed.
Also the reactor recirculation pump vane passing frequencies were filtered from the data sets. Testing on the instrumented Unit 1 steam dryer { { {.(2)} } } Reference 2 documented that the { { {(2)The filters applied to the data collected at the respective test points are identified in Tables 2, 3 and 4 below: Page 1 Table 2: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 102.0 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 1)Table 3: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 99.8 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 2)M{I* I Table 4: PSD Notch Filter Specifications for 106.3 Mlbm/hr Data (Test Point 3)+ 4 2)}} }-t 4+ 4 4 Page 2 A noise peak at approximately 136 HZ was noted during the primary system hydrostatic test prior to plant start-up. This is a condition where systems are pressurized, to operating levels but no steam flow exists. As Unit 1 ascended in power, this noise peak did not increase in proportion to the power increase. Minor random amplitude and frequency fluctuations were observed. The source of this noise could not be determined but it has been conclusively shown that it is not related to power and/or steam flow and therefore a filter has been applied to eliminate it.PSDs were calculated on 2 second blocks of data from the test time period (180 seconds).In order to increase the number of spectral averages, the data blocks were overlapped by 50%. The PSDs were calculated using a Hanning window and a 0.5 Hz bin size. The resulting PSDs were then linearly averaged and are presented as Figures 1 through 32.This method of data processing was used to provide the results in a format consistent with the processing used to develop the monitoring curves.There are also two monitoring (limit) curves included with the PSD plots. The level 1 monitoring curve represents the response of the SSES dryer finite element (FE) model under the design acoustic load conditions factored by the minimum component analysis margin to the endurance limit. The level 2 monitoring curve is based on 80% of the level 1 curve. A more complete description of the limit curves and how they are generated is included in Reference 3 and Reference
- 4. These monitoring curves provide guidance for evaluating the measured dryer response with respect to the structural analysis results.Table 5 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 102 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 1) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth (110.5% CLTP) @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain were below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 1 through 8.Table 5: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 102.0 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 1)Table 6 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm./hr (Test Point 2) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at 3850 MWth @ 99.4 Mlbm/hr (114%CLTP). { {{Page 3
.(2)} } } The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 9 through 16.Table 6: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3948 MWth and 99.8 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 2)(2}}}Table 7 below shows the maximum strain gage reading for 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr (Test Point 3) as a percent of monitoring limits generated in accordance with Reference 4 using a baseline data set from Unit 1 collected at and 3948 MWth (114%CLTP) @ 102 Mlbm/hr. All values of strain are below the level 1 and level 2 monitoring limits. The data is plotted with the monitoring limits in Figures 17 through 24.Table 7: Maximum MSL Strain Gage Readings @ 3916 MWth and 106.3 Mlbm/hr Expressed as a Ratio of the Monitoring Limits (Test Point 3)After reaching 100% power, a stress evaluation was conducted using the F-Factor and RMS methodology documented in Reference 3 and Reference
- 4. The results of that analysis are documented in Section 2.3 below and in Tables 8 through 10. {{{(2)}}}Page 4
2.2 Trending
For trending purposes, filtered MSL strain gage PSDs for powers up to 114.0% of CLTP (3952 MWth) have been plotted in a waterfall format and are presented in Figures 25 through 32. Figure 33 is a trend plot of the RMS value of the sample time histories plotted against total steam flow. Figures 25 through 33 show that MSL strains are M{ .12)}}}MSL strain gages mounted on the A and D steam lines have the highest magnitude readings. This is attributed to the 15 Hz peak being reinforced by the safety relief valve (SRV) dead-legs on these two steam lines, as discussed in References 5 and Reference 6.The Unit 1 MSL strain gage PSDs measured at 3948 MWth are similar to the PSDs measured on Unit 1 3733 MWth in frequency content and with the anticipated magnitude increase. Figures 34 through 41 show Unit 1 data plotted at 3733 MWth and 3948 MWth.An examination of Figures 34 through 41 demonstrates that the acoustic signatures are similar.2.3 Unit 1 Steam Dryer Stress Estimates As an additional analysis of the acoustic data generated by Unit 1, an F-Factor and RMS analyses (as described in Reference 3 and Reference
- 4) was conducted on a set of MSL strain gage data. This analyses generated estimates of dryer stresses at the current operating plateau. Data was taken on Unit 1 at Test Point 1 (3948 MWth and a core flow of 102 Mlbm/hr).As described in Reference 3 and Reference 4, three separate analyses were performed on the data set. Filtering of the data sets removed the recirculation system pump vane passing peaks. The results presented below exclude estimates of stresses that result from pump vane passing peaks. The effects of the vane passing peaks on total steam dryer stresses are discussed in Reference
- 2. Tables 8 through 10 contain the results of the analyses.Page 5 Table 8: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF ACM Analysis F-Factor Method i 2)1 } }Table 9: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF Supplemental Analysis F-Factor Method I.(2)} } }Page 6 Table 10: Adjusted Stress with Bias and Uncertainty and LCF Supplemental Analysis RMS Method++-I--I-+-1-(2)},}An examination of Tables 8 through 10 further demonstrates that {Template:(2)2.4 Steam Dryer Evaluation Summary The stress values presented in Tables 8 through 10 are bounded by the benchmarked stress and margin values contained in Table 7 of Reference 2 (Susquehanna Replacement Steam Dryer Updated Stress Analysis At Extended Power Uprate Conditions).
Based on the current margins indicated by the stress values in Tables 8 through 10 and in Figures 1 through 33, there is adequate projected margin {{{ (2)}}} to the steam dryer ASME endurance limit of 13,600 PSI for continued power operation at 3952 MWth.3.0 Piping Flow Induced Vibration 3.1 Introduction Piping accelerometers on the main steam, feed water, reactor recirculation, residual heat removal (RHR), reactor water cleanup (RWCU), extraction steam and HPCI piping systems were monitored during start-up. Key locations were selected based on geometry and the expected potential for vibration-related problems or maximum pipe stress. For main steam, the accelerometers were located on the "B" and "C" lines, since these are expected to be the most active. These steam lines have active flow under the SRV branch lines, as well as the HPCI and RCIC system steam supply branch connections. Accelerometers were also located at, or near, the above mentioned branch lines of interest. In all, 87 accelerometers at 36 locations were monitored during power ascension. Page 7 Prior to the start-up, two RMS acceptance levels were calculated for each accelerometer on the main steam, feed water, extraction steam, and HPCI piping systems. A level 1 value was determined based on vibration calculations using ASME OM-3 (Reference 7)allowable stresses. A level 2 value was conservatively established for each accelerometer at 80% of level 1. The accelerations used in the vibration analyses were "zero to peak" values (consistent with ASME OM-3) and conservative factors were used to determine equivalent RMS values.The Reactor Recirculation/RHR/RWCU system accelerometers were assigned only conservative level 2 RMS and "zero-to-peak" allowable values, since these systems were negligibly affected by EPU. If both criteria (i.e., RMS and "zero-to-peak") were exceeded for a given instrument, then a more detailed engineering evaluation was performed. 3.2 Data Collection Scope Data collection commenced with background data collection during the operational hydro before the Unit 1 was at power. Formal power ascension monitoring for the effects of FIV on piping initiated at the target test point of 2569 MWth (-65% full EPU power).Data was also collected and analyzed at targeted test points of 3293 MWth (OLTP), 3733 MWth (107% CLTP), 3864 MWth (- 10% CLTP) and for several core flow conditions at 3952 MWth (-114% CLTP), as described in Table 1 above. In addition, piping FIV was monitored on an hourly basis, and general plant walk downs were continuously performed during power ascension from 3733 MWth to 3864 MWth, as well as from 3864 MWth to 3952 MWth.Detailed plant walk downs of piping and components were performed for most systems affected by Extended Power Uprate located outside the drywell. These walk downs were performed at the targeted test points 3293 MWth, 3733 MWth, 3864 MWth, and 3952 MWth. The walk downs were performed for piping and components located in accessible and inaccessible (high radiation) areas. A remote controlled, mobile camera was used to observe the vibration in the inaccessible areas.3.3 Data Analysis Methodology Spectral analyses for each accelerometer were performed at each of the test points for a time period of 160 seconds. The data was evaluated based on 4 second blocks of data and to increase the number of spectral averages, the data blocks were overlapped by 50%.The data was band-pass filtered between 2 Hz and 250 Hz, with a 0.25 Hz bin size to provide for consistency with the method used to develop the acceptance criteria for the accelerometers. Significant electrical noise occurred on the extraction steam system piping at the 60 Hz multiples of the power supply frequencies. The application of notch filters was required.Multiples of the reactor recirculation pump vane passing frequency (VPF) were observed;however, the VPF frequencies were not filtered, since they represent true mechanical vibration (i.e., displacement/stress). Page 8
3.4 Results
Throughout power ascension no accelerometers degraded to the point where their output was judged to be questionable (i.e., a "near zero" output). Figures 42 through 44 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus total main steam flow/feed water flow trends during the power ascension to 3952 MWth. In addition, Figures 45 through 49 indicate the percent of allowable RMS acceleration versus core flow trends for the Reactor Recirculation, RHR, and RWCU system instruments. The walk downs were performed for piping and components located in accessible and inaccessible (i.e., high radiation) areas. As expected, the vibration observed increased with power ascension. All observed vibration was within previously established acceptance criteria.At the 106.3 Mlbm/hr core flow (Test Point 3) one accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system and 2 accelerometers on the RHR system (see Figures 45 and 49)exceeded their conservative Level 2 RMS limits but were within the Zero-to-Peak pre-established Level 2 limits. This ensures that the ASME OM-3 allowable stresses for vibration were met.A second accelerometer on the Reactor Recirculation system exceeded both its Level 2 RMS allowable and its Level 2 Zero-to-Peak allowable values (see VE16730 on Figure 45). The increase in steam and feed water flows does not affect the Reactor Recirculation and RHR system piping vibration but Reactor core flow rates do directly affect vibration levels on these systems. There was no Level 1 piping vibration limits for these piping systems. A condition report in the Susquehanna corrective action program evaluated and tracked this condition. Condition Report 1270880 determined that the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable.
3.5 Piping
Summary During the Unit 1 power ascension to 3952 MWth, piping vibration levels were monitored to assess effects of flow-induced vibration (FIV). Trending was performed, and all accelerations/displacements were within pre-established limits, based on ASME OM-3 allowable stresses with the exception of the one Reactor Recirculation instrument at a core flow of 106.3 Mlbm/hr mentioned above. After additional analysis, the measured acceleration at this location resulted in stresses that were less than ASME OM-3 allowable by 31%.The piping/components walks down results were as expected; general vibration levels increased during power ascension but the overall response of piping and components were within established criteria.Page 9 4.0
References:
- 1. PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-6176 (Figure 31-1), "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Proposed License Amendment No. 285 For Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF-14 And Proposed License Amendment No. 253 For Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF-22 Extended Power Update Application Regarding Steam Dryer And Flow Effects Request For Additional Information Responses", dated 4/27/2007 2. GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Engineering Report 0000-0095-2113-P-RO, "Susquehanna Replacement Steam Dryer Updated Stress Analysis At Extended Power Uprate Conditions", Class III, February 2009 (Provided via PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-6484, dated 2/27/09)3. GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Engineering Report 0000-0096-5766-P-R1, "Revised Susquehanna Replacement Steam Dryer Limit Curves -Main Steam Line Mounted Instrumentation", Class III, February 2009 (Provided via PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-6484, dated 2/27/09)4. GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Engineering Report 0000-0101-0766-P-RO, "Main Steam Line Limit Curve Adjustment During Power Ascension", Class III, April 2009 (Provided via PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-65 10, dated 5/12/09)5. PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-6076 (Attachment 10), "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Proposed License Amendment No. 285 For Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF-14 And Proposed License Amendment No. 253 For Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF-22 Constant Pressure Power Uprate", dated 10/11/2006
- 6. PPL Letter To USNRC, PLA-6176 (Questions 4, 7, and 31), "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Proposed License Amendment No. 285 For Unit 1 Operating License No.NPF-14 And Proposed License Amendment No. 253 For Unit 2 Operating License No.NPF-22 Extended Power Update Application Regarding Steam Dryer and Flow Effects Request for Additional Information Responses", dated 4/27/2007 7. ASME OMb-S/G-2005, "Standards and Guides for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants", Part 3, "Requirements for Preoperational and Initial Start-Up Vibration Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Piping Systems" (ASME OM-3)Page 10 (21))Figure 1: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 Figure 2: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 (21111 Page 11 (2) 1})}Figure 3: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 Figure 4: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 (2)} } }Page 12 (2)} }}Figure 5: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 Figure 6: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 (2)}} }Page 13 (2)} } }Figure 7: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 Figure 8: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 1 (2)}}}Page 14 (2) }1}Figure 9: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 Figure 10: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 (2)} }}Page 15 2)} }}Figure 11: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 Figure 12: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 (2)}} }Page 16 21)}}}Figure 13: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 Figure 14: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 (2)} }}Page 17 (2)} } }Figure 15: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 Figure 16: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 2 (2)} }}Page 18 (2)} } }Figure 17: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 Figure 18: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 Page 19 (2)}} }
(2)} } }Figure 19: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 Figure 20: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 (2)} } }Page 20 (2)} } }Figure 21: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 Figure 22: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 (2)} } }Page 21 (2)} }Figure 23: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 Figure 24: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Plot at Test Point 3 (2)} 1 )Page 22 (2)} } }Figure 25: MSL A Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot Figure 26: MSL A Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot (2)}}}Page 23 (2)}}}Figure 27: MSL B Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot Figure 28: MSL B Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot Page 24 (2)}} } (2)}} }Figure 29: MSL C Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot Figure 30: MSL C Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot (2)}} }Page 25 (2)} }}Figure 31: MSL D Upper Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot Figure 32: MSL D Lower Strain Gage PSD Waterfall Plot (2)} }}Page 26 j F2)i } }Figure 33: MSL Strain Gage Time History RMS Trends Page 27 (2)}} }Figure 34: MSL A Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWthComparison Figure 35: MSL A Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison (2)} } }Page 28 Figure 36: MSL B Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison Figure 37: MSL B Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison (2)~(2)}}Page 29 (2)} }}Figure 38: MSL C Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison Figure 39: MSL C Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison Page 30 (2)} } } (2)} }}Figure 40: MSL D Upper 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth Comparison Figure 41: MSL D Lower 3733 MWth vs. 3948 MWth ComparisonPage 31 Unit I -Spring 2010 -Main Steam Line 'B' Piping -Percent of Allowables 100%90%80%70%£0* 60%50%0 40%0.30%20%10%0%0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Main Steam Flow -Mlbs/hr Figure 42: Main Steam Line 'B' Piping -% of Allowables (RMS)Unit I -Spring 2010 -Main Steam Line 'C' Piping -Percent of Allowables 0.eU 100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%2 4 6 8 10 Main Steam Flow -Mlbs/hr 12 14 16 18 Figure 43: Main Steam Line 'C' Piping -% of Allowables (RMS)Page 32 Unit I -Spring 2010 -Feedwater Piping -Percent of Allowables 4, as 0!0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Feedwater Flow -Mlbs/hr Figure 44: Feedwater Piping -% of Allowables (RMS)Unit I -Spring 2010 -Recirculation Loop 'A' Piping -Percent of Allowables Note: Excludes 100 Mlbs/hr test data U, U a 3 U 0 0 0 U 0 0.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Total Core Flow -Mlbs/hr Figure 45: Reactor Recirculation 'A' Loop Piping -% of Allowables (RMS)Page 33 Unit I -Spring 2010 -RHR inside of Containment Piping -Percent of Allowables Note: Excludes 100 Mlbs/hr test data 100% .-- --------------------- .0 a.90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Core Flow -Mlbslhr 70 80 90 100 110 Figure 46: RHR 'A' Loop Inside Containment Piping -% of Allowables (RMS)Unit I -Spring 2010 -RRS 'B' and RHR 'B' loop Piping Allowables Note: Excludes 100 Mlbs/hr test data 100%90%80%70%U)2 0 60%50%V 40%3.30%Level2 4 100%of aceptance 'rtra Both RM 1 > an ZerajTo-PeakEcee --VE16749 RHR-B F050B vert-4--VE16750 RHR-B F050B E-W VE16751 RHR-B F050B N-S-X- VE16752 RHR-B F050B body*-VE16744 RRS-B N2E riser--*-VE16745 RRS-B 4" byp riser--+-VE16746 RRS-B 4" byp run-VE16747 RRS-B 2" rwcu e-w-VE16748 RRS-B 2" nwcu n-s 20%10%0%, V7---I. 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Core Flow -Mlbslhr 70 80 90 100 110 Figure 47: Reactor Recirculation 'B' and RHR 'B' Loop Inside Containment Piping% of Allowables (RMS)Page 34 Unit I -Spring 2010 -HVI51F015A & B Valves -Percent of Allowable 100%90%80%70%____Note: E Ws100 1 Akh ata ...i\ Le2=0%oa rl_____~a'N Dtailed E .glneaehin .wRequired if BohRMSrad Zerro-l o-Peaek bceVe.0'U 0 0 C a a'0.60% i 50% 1 VE16769 RHR-A F15Ao horz-U-- VE16770 RHR-A F15Ao vert VE16771 RHR-A F15Ao para---VE16772 RHR-A F15Av horz--N VE16773 RHR-A F15Av vert--*-VE16779 RHR-B F15Bo horz---VE16780 RHR-B F15Bo vert-VE16781 RHR-B F15Bo para-VE16782 RHR-B F15Bv horz VE16783 RHR-B F15Bv vert 9 40% -30% -If 20%10%0%A 1I[1J7K N's t1- I-Ma 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Core Flow -Mlbsihr 70 80 90 100 110 Figure 48: RHR HV151FO15A & B Valves (Outside Containment)% of Allowables (RMS)Unit I -Spring 2010 -HVI51FO17A & B Valves -Percent of Allowable 0 3'U 0 0 C 0 0 a-150% ___ ___ ___0NoT: EL 100 1 W tefi data 140%130% L .. ..120% ___ ___1VE 1 84 7 both 8 110% --100% .----- ----- -- ---.-. --90% Lai2.-.E of -r-4--VE16774 RHR-A F17Ao horz Detaled rviee, if 80% -U-VE16775 RHR-A F17Ao vert Rnt' M dA --70% VE16776 RHR-A F17Ao para-X-VE16777 RHR-A F17Av horz 60% -INVE16778 RHR-A F17Av vert 50% ---VE16784 RHR-B F17Bo horz-a- VE16785 RHR-B F17Bo vert 40% -VE16786 RHR-B F17Bo pare 30% -VE16787 RHR-B F17Bv horz VE16788 RHR-B F17Bv vert 20% -_10%0% k 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Core Flow -Mlbslhr 70 80 90 100 110 Figure 49: RHR HV151FO17A & B Valves (Outside Containment)% of Allowables (RMS)Page 35 Non-Proprietary Appendix A Plant Data Log Sheets Page 36 Non-.Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Start jDate/Time 6/512010 12:46 (Start)Comouter ID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) uO1.nba01 3946.78 MWth Thermal Power (15 min Ave.) uO1.nbal01 3934.39 MWth Electrical Power uO1.traI78 1303.50 Mwe Total Core Flow uO1.traO26 101.85 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop Flow A uO0.traO28 51.15 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow B uO0.traO29 50.74 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop A Suction Temperature uO1.nrt01 525.55 oF Recirc Loop B Suction Temperature uO0.nrt02 525.81 OF Core Plate D/P uO0.traO27 16.64 PSI Indicated Steam Flow Line A uO1.nff01 4.22 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line B uOI.nffO2 4.37 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line C uOl.nffO3 4.39 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line D uO1.nffO4 4.24 M Ibm/hr Indicated Total Steam Flow uO0.traO97 17.24 M Ibm/hr Indicated Feedwater Flow uOI.traO98 16.81 M Ibmlhr Feedwater Temperature Line A uO0.traIO2 400.70 -F Feedwater Temperature Line B uO0.tralO3 401.91 OF Feedwater Temperature Line C uO0.tra104 402.65 OF Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range uO0.tra2O8 1032.79 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range uOI.tra2O9 1032.81 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature uO0.nfa05 550.19 °F Recirculation Pump A Speed vm.lp4OIa/la rrp tac 1499.00 RPM Recirculatlon Pump B Speed vm.lp4OIb/lbrrp tac 1503.00 RPM Reclrculation Pump A Power u01.nrj51 4.28 MWe Reclrculation Pump B Power uOl.nrj52 4.27 MWe CR0 Cooling Header Flow uO0.nef03 64.46 GPM CRD System Flow uO0.nef01 63.34 GPM CRD System Temperature uO1.ndtO5 142.57 OF Bottom Head Drain Temp uO1.tra2O6 533.15 OF Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO0.tra142 34.94 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfl02 34.10 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO1.nflO3 33.51 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range uO1.tra143 37.31 Inches H20 Recirculation Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a 124.92 Hz Recirculation Pump B Vane Passing Freq. n/a 125.25 Hz Recirculation Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 50.47 Hz Reclrculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 50.61 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) uOl.nff77 5.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) uOl.nff78 5.54 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) uO0.nff79 5.50 M Ibm/hr CRD Flow uOl.ndf0l 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.56 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.06 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.20 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C nla 4.22 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line 0 n/a 4.08 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.56 M Ibmlhr Test Point I -3948 MWlh / 102 Mlbm/hr -Start Page 37 Non-Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Finish jDate/Tlme, 6/15/2010 12:49 (Finish)ComouerlID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) uO0.nba01 3948.67 MWth Thermal Power (15 min Ave.) uO1.nbal0 3940.32 MWth Electrical Power uO0.traI78 1308.85 Mwe Total Core Flow uO0.traO26 102.11 M Ibmlhr Reclrc Loop Flow A uO01traO28 51.18 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow B uOl.traO29 50.77 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop A Suction Temperature uO1 .nrt01 526.57 °F Recirc Loop B Suction Temperature uO1.nrt02 525.83 oF Core Plate DIP U01.tra027 16.59 PSI Steam Flow Line A uO1.nff01 4.22 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B u01.nff02 4.38 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C uO1.nffO3 4.39 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D u01.nff04 4.24 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow uO0.traO97 17.28 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Flow uO1.traO98 16.75 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Temperature Line A uO.tralO2 400.73 °F Feedwater Temperature Line B uO0.tralO3 401.95 °F Feedwater Temperature Line C uOi.traIO4 402.66 TF Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range u01.tra2O8 1032.90 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range uO1.tra2O9 1032.70 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature uOI.nfaO6 560.20 TF Recirculation Pump A Speed vm,1 p401 a/la_rrp_tac 1497.00 RPM Recirculatlon Pump B Speed vm.1 p401 b/lb rrpjtac 1502.00 RPM Recirculation Pump A Power uO0.nrj5I 4.29 MWe Recirculation Pump B Power uO0.nrj52 4.28 MWe CRD Cooling Header Flow uO0.nef03 64.46 GPM CRD System Flow uO0.nef01 63.34 GPM CRD System Temperature uO1.ndt05 142.66 T Bottom Head Drain Temp uO1.tra2O6 535.16 TF Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO1.tra142 35.88 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uOl.nfiO2 34.16 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO1 .nfl03 36.07 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range uOI.tra143 36.68 Inches H20 Recirculatlon Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a 124.75 Hz Recirculation Pump B Vane Passing Freq. n/a 125.17 Hz Recirculatlon Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 50.40 Hz Recirculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 50.57 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) uOI.nff77 5.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) uOI.nff78 65.3 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) uO0.nff79 5.50 M ibm/hr CRD Flow uO0 .ndf01 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.66 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.05 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.20 M ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C n/a 4.22 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D n/a 4.08 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.55 M Ibm/hr Test Point I -3948 MWth @ 102 MlIh/hr -Finish Page 38 Non-Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Start Date/Time 6/9/2010 12:50 (Start)Comp~uter ID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) u01.nba0l 3947.23 MWth Thermal Power (15 min Ave.) u01.nbal0l 3947.18 MWth Electrical Power uO1.tral78 1337.57 Mwe Total Core Flow uOl.traO26 99.47 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow A u01.tra028 50.68 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow B uOl.traO29 49.89 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop A Suction Temperature uOl.nrt0l 525.30 OF Recirc Loop B Suction Temperature uO0.nrt02 525.61 OF Core Plate D/P uOl.traO27 15.96 PSI Indicated Steam Flow Line A uOl.nff0l 4.27 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line B uOl.nff02 4.37 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line C u01.nff03 4.39 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line D uOl.nff04 4.25 M Ibm/hr Indicated Total Steam Flow uOl.traO97 17.16 M Ibm/hr Indicated Feedwater Flow uO0.traO98 16.78 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Temperature Line A u01.tral02 400.76 OF Feedwater Temperature Line B u0l.tral03 402.17 OF Feedwater Temperature Line C u0l.tral04 402.68 OF Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range uOl.tra2O8 1032.81 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range u01.tra209 1032.06 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature uOl.nfa05 550.22 OF Recirculation Pump A Speed vm.lp4Ola/la rrptac 1472.00 RPM Recirculation Pump B Speed vm.lp401b/lb rrp tac 1479.00 RPM Recirculation Pump A Power uOl.nrj5l 4.07 MWe Recirculatlon Pump B Power u01.nrj52 4.08 MWe CRD Cooling Header Flow uOl.nef03 64.28 GPM CRD System Flow u01.nef0l 63.35 GPM CRD System Temperature u0l.ndt05 132.25 OF Bottom Head Drain Temp uOl.tra2O6 534.70 OF Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.tral42 36.43 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfl02 35.78 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u0l.nfl03 36.91 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range uOl.tra143 37.24 Inches H20 Recirculatlon Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a. 122.67 Hz Reclrculatlon Pump B Vane Passing Freq. n/a 123.25 Hz Recirculation Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 49.56 Hz Recirculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 49.80 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) uOl.nft77 5.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) uOl.nff78 5.53 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) uOl.nff79 5.50 M Ibm/hr CRD Flow uOl.ndf0l 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.55 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.09 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.18 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C n/a 4.20 M ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D n/a 4.08 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.55 M Ibm/hr Test Point 2 -3948 MWth / 99.8 Mlbm/hr -Start Page 39 Non-Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Finish Date/lime 6/9/2010 12:53 IIZ (Finish)Computer ID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) u01.nba0t 3946.43 MWth Thermal Power (16 min Ave.) u01.nbal01 3947.36 MWth Electrical Power u0l.tra178 1326.86 Mwe Total Core Flow uOl.traO26 100.09 M Ibmlhr Recirc Loop Flow A u01.tra028 50.69 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop Flow B u01.tra029 49.91 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop A Suction Temperature u01.nrt01 625.30 OF Reclrc Loop B Suction Temperature u01.nrt02 525.60 OF Core Plate DIP u01.tra027 16.08 PSI Steam Flow Line A u01.nff01 4.27 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B u01.nff02 4.37 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C u01.nff03 4.39 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D u01.nff04 4.25 M Ibmlhr Total Steam Flow uOl.traO97 17.23 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Flow u01.tra098 16.75 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Temperature Line A u0l.tral02 400.75 OF Feedwater Temperature Line B uOl.tralO03 402.18 OF Feedwater Temperature Line C u01.tra104 402.70 =F Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range u01.tra208 1033.51 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range u01.tra209 1032.54 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature uOl.nfa05 560.22 OF Recirculation Pump A Speed vm.lp4Ola/la rrpjtac 1470.00 RPM Reclrculation Pump B Speed vmrtp401b/1b rrptac 1477.00 RPM Recirculation Pump A Power uOl 4.08 MWe Recirculation Pump B Power uO1,nrd52 4.09 MWe CRD Cooling Header Flow u01.nef03 64.27 GPM CRD System Flow u01.nef01 63.34 GPM CRD System Temperature u01.ndt05 132.26 OF Bottom Head Drain Temp u0l.tra206 626.14 °F Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.tra142 34.08 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfl02 35.16 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfl03 33.86 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range uOl.tral43 37.28 Inches H20 Recirculation Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a 122.50 Hz Recirculatlon Pump B Vane Passing Freg. n/a 123.08 Hz Recirculation Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 49.49 Hz Recirculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 49.73 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) uO1.nff77 5.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) u01.nff78 5.54 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) uOl.nff79 5.50 M Ibm/hr CRD Flow u01 .ndf01 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.56 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.09 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.19 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C n/a 4.21 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D n/a 4.08 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.56 M Ibm/hr Test Point 2 -3948 MWmb / 99.8 MIbm/hr -Finish Page 40 Non-Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Start I Date/Time 6/1012010 19:54 I (Start)Compouter ID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) uO1.nba01 3916.20 MWth Thermal Power (15 min Ave.) uO1.nbal01 3902.81 MWth Electrical Power uO1.tra178 1296.68 Mwe Total Core Flow uOl.traO26 106.42 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop Flow A uOl.traO28 51.98 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow B uOl.traO29 54.04 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop A Suction Temperature uO1.nrt01 526.36 TF Reclrc Loop B Suction Temperature uO1.nrt02 526.60 °F Core Plate DIP uOl.traO27 17.82 PSI Indicated Steam Flow Line A u01.nffO1 4.16 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line B uO1.nffO2 4.32 M Ibm/hr Indicated Steam Flow Line C uO1.nffO3 4.39 M Ibm/hr IndIcated Steam Flow Line D uO1.nffO4 4.21 M Ibm/hr Indicated Total Steam Flow uOl.traO97 17.12 M Ibm/hr Indicated Feedwater Flow uO1.traO98 16.66 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Temperature Line A uG1.tral02 400.16 .F Feedwater Temperature Line B uO1.tralO3 401.47 *F Feedwater Temperature Line C uO1.tralO4 402.13 *F Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range uO1.tra2O8 1031.36 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range uO1.tra2O9 1031.14 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature uO1.nfa05 550.05 T Recirculatlon Pump A Speed vm.lp401a/la rrp tac 1543.00 RPM Recirculation Pump B Speed vm.lp401bIlbrrp tac 1577.00 RPM Reclrculation Pump A Power uO1.nrJ51 4.62 MWe Recirculatlon Pump B Power uO1.nrj52 4.90 MWe CR0 Cooling Header Flow uO1.nef03 64.36 GPM CRD System Flow uO1.nef01 63.34 GPM CR0 System Temperature uO1.ndt05 138.22 TF Bottom Head Drain Temp uO1.tra2O6 534.71 OF Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO1.tra142 35.47 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfi02 35.17 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range uO1.nflO3 35.10 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range uO1.tra143 36.90 Inches H20 Recirculation Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a 128.58 Hz Recirculation Pump B Vane Passing Freq. n/a 131.42 Hz Recirculation Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 51.95 Hz Recirculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 53.10 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) .uO.nff77 5.45 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) uO1.nff78 5.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) uOl.nff79 5.46 M Ibm/hr CRD Flow uO1.ndfO1 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.43 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.00 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.15 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C n/a 4.22 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D n/a 4.05 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.43 M Ibm/hr Test Point 3 -3916 NIW,h /106.3 Mlb,/hr -Start Page 41 Non-Proprietary Steam Dryer Data Log Sheets Finish[Date/Time 611012010 19:57 I (Finish)Value Units Computer ID Value Units Thermal Power (Instantaneous) u01.nba01 3917.11 MWth Thermal Power (15 min Ave.) u01.nbal0I 3906.11 MWth Electrical Power u01.tra178 1298.14 Mwe Total Core Flow u01.tra026 106.11 M Ibm/hr Recirc Loop Flow A u0t .tra028 62.01 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop Flow B u01.tra029 54.02 M Ibm/hr Reclrc Loop A Suction Temperature u01.nrt01 526.38 =F Recirc Loop. B Suction Temperature u01.nrt02 526.61 °F Core Plate D/P u01.tra027 17.76 PSI Steam Flow Line A u01.nff01 4.16 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line B u01.nff02 4.32 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C u0I.nff03 4.39 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D u01.nff04 4.21 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow u01.tra097 17.11 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Flow u01.tra098 16.66 M Ibm/hr Feedwater Temperature Line A u0t.tral02 400.18 OF Feedwater Temperature Line B u01.tra103 401.49 OF Feedwater Temperature Line C u01.tral04 402.15 OF Rx Dome Pressure Narrow Range u01.tra208 1031.45 PSIG Rx Dome Pressure Wide Range u01.tra209 1031.06 PSIG Steam Dome Temperature u01.nfa06 550.06 OF Recirculation Pump A Speed vm.lp4Ola/la rrpjac 1642.00 RPM Recirculation Pump B Speed vm.lp401b/lb rrptac 1575.00 RPM Recirculation Pump A Power u01.nrj61 4.63 MWe Recirculation Pump B Power u01.nr162 4.91 MWe CRD Cooling Header Flow u01.nef03 64.36 GPM CRD System Flow u01.nef01 63.33 GPM CRD System Temperature u01.ndt05 138.19 OF Bottom Head Drain Temp u01.tra206 631.20 OF Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.tra142 35.76 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfI02 35.05 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Narrow Range u01.nfl03 36.07 Inches H20 Reactor Water Level Wide Range u01.tra143 36.86 Inches H20 Recirculation Pump A Vane Passing Freq. n/a 128.50 Hz Recirculation Pump B Vane Passing Freq. n/a 131.25 Hz Recirculation Pump A Motor Frequency n/a 51.92 Hz Recirculation Pump B Motor Frequency n/a 53.03 Hz Enhanced Steam Flow Calculations Feed Flow Line A (LEFM) u0t.nff77 5.45 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line B (LEFM) uOl.nff78 6.49 M Ibm/hr Feed Flow Line C (LEFM) u01.nff79 6.45 M Ibm/hr CRD Flow u01.ndf01 0.03 M Ibm/hr Total Feedwater Flow n/a 16.43 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line A n/a 4.00 M Ibmlhr Steam Flow Line B n/a 4.16 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line C n/a 4.22 M Ibm/hr Steam Flow Line D n/a 4.05 M Ibm/hr Total Steam Flow n/a 16.43 M Ibm/hr Test Point 3 -3916 MWth / 106.3 MIb /hr -Finish Page 42 Enclosure 3 to PLA-6633"Unit 1 License Condition 2.C.(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results" Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results This report provides the results of the Unit 1 16RIO Steam Dryer visual inspections in accordance with Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f). Summary of Results: The Unit 1 steam dryer was inspected in accordance with the requirements of BWRVIP-139 and recommendations from General Electric, the steam dryer manufacturer. The examination consisted of 406 separate welds and components with the following non-conforming conditions identified:
- Cracks were discovered in non-structural tack welds on all four lifting eye anti-rotation set screws. The tack weld cracks were functionally repaired by a modification in which additional weld metal was added between the lifting eye and lifting rod. These new welds have been included in the steam dryer inspection program and will be inspected during the next Unit 1 refueling outage." Three small cracks were discovered in the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) of one drain channel weld. The cracks in the drain channel Heat Affected Zone were concluded to be Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (IGSCC) and the disposition was use-as-is.
The drain channel IGSCC cracks will be inspected during the next Unit 1 refueling outage to determine if any crack growth has occurred.There were no other non-conforming conditions identified during the inspection process.This complete inspection scope will be repeated in each of the next two refueling outages (2012 and 2014). the inspection scope beyond these outages will consist of a sampling program.Inspection Methods Used: The VT-i visual examination was utilized to visually determine the condition of a part, component or surface and to reveal such conditions as cracks, wear, corrosion, erosion and/or physical damage to such parts, especially welded joints.The VT-3 visual examination was utilized to determine structural integrity, the measurement of clearances, detection of physical displacement, determination of the structural adequacy of supporting elements, the soundness of connections between load carrying structural members, and tightness of bolting.Inspection Results Identification: NRI -No Recordable Indication. The weld or component was in compliance with the inspection acceptance criteria, no cracks or deformation during inspection was discovered. No further actions were required.RI -Recordable Indication. The weld or component contained a defect such as a crack or deformation that resulted in further evaluation and disposition in the Corrective Action Program.Page 1 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER 140-DEG LIFT ANCHOR WELDS 3/11/2010 vF-r-NRIJ .....Repair -Add additional weld material between lifting eye and lifting rod DRYER 140-DEG LIFTING EYE TACK WELDS Cracked tack weld 3/6/2010 VT-3 RI 1240628 DRYER 220-DEG LIFT ANCHOR WELDS DRYER 220-DEG LIFT ANCHOR WELDS 3/6/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI Repair -Add additional weld material between lifting eye and lifting rod DRYER 220-DEG LIFTING EYE TACK WELDS DRYER 320-DEG LIFT.ANCHOR WELDS DRYER 320-DEG LIFT.ANCHO_9R WELDDS.3/6/2010 VT-3 RI Cracked tack weld 1239962..3/1-2/20-1.0 -I....N !RI.....NRI 3/14/2010 VTI-I................ .~ ~ ~~~............ ................. i Repair -Add additional weld material.between lifting eye d I and lifting.I.d rod DRYER 320-DEG LIFTING EYETACK WELDS 3/6/2010 VT-3 RI I IDRYER 40-DEG LIFT ANCHOR WELDS -P 311/ 1-1 NRI DRYER 40-DEG LIFTING I EYE TACK WELDS _ 3/9/2010 -VT-3 NRI _Crackec tack we 241230 Page 2 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results Add additional weld material between lifting eye Cracked and lifting tack weld rod DRYER 40-DEG LIFTING EYE TACK WELDS DRYER COVER PLATE WELDS 270 DEG 3/13/2010 3/17/2010 VT-3 RI 1243888 VT-1 NRI DRYER COVER PLATE WELDS 90 DEG DRYER HOOD A 3/20/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/19/2010 Iv-r-3 INRI DRYER HOOD A 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD A 0 DEG I HOOD SUPPORT 3/12/2010 VT-I .NRI .DRYER HOOD A 180 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI ___DRYER HOOD A 180 DEG SEAM WELD I DRYER HOOD A 180 DEG SEAM WELD DRYER HOOD A DIVIDER 11PLATE .. 0 DEG DRYER HOOD A DIVIDER IPLATE 180 DEG DRYER HOOD A P6 PLUG DRYER HOOD A UPPER HORIZONTAL WELD DRYER HOOD B DRYER HOOD B 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD B 0 DEG I SEAM WELD 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/11/2010 VT:ijNF~.3/1, 11/2-0-10 VT-i 3/11/2010 VT-i 3/16/2010 1 VT-3 NRI NRI NRI NRI 3/16/2010 3/21/20 10 3/11/2010 3/10/2010 VT-1 VT-3 VT-1 NRI NRI.......... ...VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD B 180 DEG[HOOD SUPPORT I DRYER HOOD B 180 DEG..SEAM WELD 1 DRYER HOOD B CENTER S E A.M W E LD........................... ........................ I DRYER HOOD B DIVIDER I PLATE 0 DEG 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI N R .......... 3/9/2010 oVT-i........ .... ... ... .... ... ....... ... ........... 3/110/2010 ..3/11/201.0. 3/11/2010* -I [N*-... .... NRI VT-I NRI Page 3 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER HOOD B DIVIDER PLATE 180 DEG 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD B DIVIDER PLATE MID 3/11/2010 DRYER HOOD B MID HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD C DRYER HOOD C 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD C 0 DEG SEAM WELD-. E.A..... ..... .. L... ............. .... .... ........ -.. -. ..... ......... .......... DRYER HOOD C 180 DE'..H o o su_.P.PO R T ......... ...................... DRYER HOOD C 180 DE SEAM WELD DRYER HOOD C CENTE SEAM WELD DRYER HOOD C DIVIDE PLATE 0 DEG DRYER HOOD C DIVIDE1-8-0 ......D. ........DRYER HOOD C DIVIDE PLATE MID DRYER HOOD C MID HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD C MID HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 3/22/2010 VT-1 VT-3 NRI 3/1120101 VT-I-3./11..1/2010. VT-I NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI 3/11/2010 1'VT-I 3/9/2010 VT-1 I...... .. ..... ......... ........................ ....3/11/2010 VT-I 3/11/2010 3/.1/20910 VT-1 VT-1 I NRI NRI NRI i'[3/11/2010 1 VT-1 i NRI 3/11/2010 3/12/2010 VT-I NRI VT-i R DRYER HOOD D 3/20/2010 VT-3 NRI-F --- _____ ______4 DRYER HOOD D 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD D 0 DEG HOODSU..P-PORT ...................... DRYER HOOD D 0 DEG.SEA.M _W E LD ............................ DRYER HOOD D 0 DEG SEAM WELD NRI 3/12/2010 1 VT-1 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI VT-1 NRI VT-1i NRI-f-DRYER HOODD 180 DEG HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD D 180 DEG SEAM WELD DRYER HOOD D CENTER....S .E.A M _W E D .................. ...-..... .......... DRYER HOOD D DIVIDER PLATE 0 DEG DRYER HOOD D DIVIDER PLATE 180 DEG 3/11/2010 VT-i ItNRI 3/6/2010 1 VT-I 3ý/6/-2.0.10 VT7-i 3/11/2010 VT-1 3/11/2_0_10_ VT-I_iJ' NRI NRI NRI Page 4 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER HOOD D DIVIDER I PLATE MID DRYER HOOD D MID HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD D MID HOOD SUPPORT DRYER HOOD E DRYER HOOD E 3/11/2010 ý VIT-I 3/12/2010 1 vr-NRI NRI 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/20/2010 VT-3 NRI I. -~3/22/2010 VT-3 NRI--~----------t--- *- --F -I--.DRY.ER HOODE DRYER HOOD E 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT.1 ...... ..... .-3/23/2010 3/12/2010 VT-I.N R1..NRI DRYER HOOD E 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E 0 DEG SEAM WELD 3/6/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E 180 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 VT-i NRI DRYER HOOD E 180 DEG SEAM WELD 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E 180 DEG ISEAM WELD 3/16/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E CENTER SEAM WELD 3/6/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E DIVIDER , ..__ .A ..T... ....... _ .) D ... .... .... ..... ..................... ..... .......... ...... ... ....... ........... ............... ........ ......... .. ............ ....... .. ......... ................... ............. .............. ........ ...... ............ .............. .... .........DRYER HOOD E DIVIDER IPLAT.E.-180 .DEG .... 3/ 1 2 1 VT-i ...NR..I....... ... ... ........ ........DRYER HOOD E DIVIDER PLATE MID 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD E MID HOOD SUPPORT 3/12/2010 VT-I NRI DRYER HOOD E MID HOOD SUPPORT 3/12/2010_VT-1 NRI DRYER HOOD F 3/20/2010 VT-3 NRI DRYER HOOD F 3/22/2010 VT-3 I NRI _DRYER HOOD F 0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 DRYER HOOD F0 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/13/2010 I DRYER HOOD F 0 DEG 1..SEA M W E.-LD ......3........./...-.-............... ........... 2............ 3 6/ 2-0-1-0... L DRYER HOOD F 180 DEG HOOD SUPPORT 3/11/2010 DRYER HOOD F DIVIDER PLATE 0 DEG 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 NRI VT-i VT-1 IjVT'-I NRI NRI NRI Page 5 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER HOOD F DIVIDER PLATE 180 DEG VT-1 NRI 3/11/2010- -.~ 4 DRYER HOOD F UPPER HORIZONTAL WELD DRYER HOOD F180 DEG SEAM WELD DRYER LOWER GUIDE 0 DEG DRYER LOWER GUIDE 180 DEG I VTI-1I NRI 3/17/2010 3/11/2010 313/132010 3/12/2010 VT-i VT-3 VT-3 NRI NRI NRI.. .... ....DRYER LUGLL-A 40 DEG DRYER LUG LL-A 40 DEG ANCHOR WELD DRYER LUG LL-A 40 DEG ANCHOR WELD 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 VT-3 VT-1 NRI NRI- -4------4 4 3/14/2010 VT-i NRI+ -I -+ + --- ------4-DRYER LUG LL-A 40 DEG LOWER BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-A 40 DEG MIDDLE BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-A 40 DEG UPPER BRACKET................. DRYER LUG LL-B 140 DEG DRYER LUG LL-B 140 DEG ANCHOR WELD DRYER LUG LL-B 140 DEG LOWER BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-B 140 DEG MIDDLE BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-B 140 UPPER BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-C 220 DEG DRYER LUG LL-C 220 DEG ANCHOR WELD DRYER LUG LL-C 220..D.EG U PPE.R BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-C 220 LOWER BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-C 220 LOWER BRACKET DRYER LUG LL-C 220 MIDDLE DRYER LUG LL-D 320....-P E P. .................... .................. ............ -._ .._....... ... .............. DRYER LUG LL-D 320 DEG ANCHOR WELD 3/11/2010 1 VT-1 NRI 3/ .1/20 0 ....... .....{j ,V T -I .........N R ,! ............................. 3/11/2010 VT-3 NRI 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/11/2010 jVT-I NRI---------3/11/2010 VT-I'-NRI NRI 3/11/2010 VT-1 3/6/2010 3/6/2010 3/6/2010 3/6/2010 VT_3 VT-I NRI NRI VT-I VT-I.. N.RI...NRI 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI-- -- L 3/6/2010 "VT-1 NRI 317/2.010 ..VT-3..N R.I.NRI 3/7/2010 vTr-1 Page 6 of 17 Unit I License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER LUG LL-D 320 DEG LOWER BRACKET 3/7/2010 v-r-I NRI DRYER LUG LL-D 320 DEG MIDDLE BRACKET 3/7/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER LUG LL-D 320 DEG UPPER BRACKET DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG A LUG A DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG B DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG B DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG B DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG C 3/7/2010 VT-1 3/10/2010 VT-3 3/13/2010 VT-1 3/13/2010 F VT-1 3/13/2010 VT-3-3/1-4/2.010.... VT-3 3/14/2010 VT-I 3/16/2010 VT-3 3/16/2010 I VT-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI.I.. ... ... ..-I--4 4- 4 -----4.---DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG D DRYER SEISMIC RING LUG D NRI NRI DRYER SKIRT DRYER SKIRT DRYER SKIRT..... .DRyER .I SKI RT ............... ....DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT 1 3/13/2010 VT-3 NRI 3/17/2010 VT-3 NRI-1 + ------4 --3/19/20101 VT-3 3/20/2010 ] VT-3 3/12/2010 VT-I NRI NRI NRI.... ... ............. ___DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT 2 DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT 3 DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT4 DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT 5 DRYER TRANS BRACE BRACEKT 6 VT-1 3/12/2010 3/12/2010_ VT-1 3/12/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 vr-1 3/12/2010 vr-I NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI.. ... .... .... .DRYER WELD DC-A-1 3/8/2010 I VT-I 4- 4 --NRI DRYER WELD DC-A-2 DRYER WELD DC-A-3 DRYER WELD DC-A-4 3/1 312010 Vi-r-1 _3/9/2010 VT-i 3/13/2010 VT-i NRI NRI}---F-i-1 DRYER WELD DC-A-4 NRI DRYER WELD DC-B-1 DRYER WELD DC-B-2 DRYER WELD DC-B-2 DRYER WELD DC-B-2 DRYER WELD DC-B-3 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI 1 3/13/20101 VT-1 NRI _3/20/2010 .VT-1 NRI 3/13/2010 LVTf- 1 [NRI _---* -... ......... .. ......Page 7 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results UKYhK WELU UD-B-4 DRYER WELD DC-C-1 DRYER WELD DC-C-2 DRYER WELD DC-C-3 r 31i312i 1 U 3/13/2010 3/15/2010 3113/2010 3/13/2010 316/2010 3/8/2010 V I.-I VT-1 VT-1 VTi1 NKI NRI NRI NRI J+- ------------------ DRYER WELD DC-C.DRYERWELD DC-D-1 DRYER WELD DC-D-2 VT-i vT-I VT-I NRI NRI NRI DRYER WELD DC-D-3 3/12/2010 I VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD DC-D-4 3/6/2010 VT-1i_ NRI DRYER WELD ER-A-1 3/13/2010 VT-1i NRI-1. ..T _.. _W..E. _ _ .E...... ................. -.1. ....... 30..!.2.. ..1...... _v.... -l .. ........ ... -N... ...... ................... ........... .......... .. ..... ................................. ................ ......... .......................... i DRYER WELD ER-B-1 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD ER-B-2 3/11/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD ER-C-1 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI!DRYER WELD ER-C-2 3/14/2010 VT-1 NRI DR k*Y- ER- W**E,-L, D- *E-R- ,D-1 3 1 3/1 3-/ 0-1-0 1FVT-I NRI-L. ..DRYER WELD ER-D-2 3/12/206i0[V-I.. NRI I DRYER WELD ER-E-i 3/9/2010 1VT-I NRI DRYER WELD ER-E-i 3/13/2010 I VT-I NRI DRYER WELD ER-E-2 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI DRYER WELD ER-F-1 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD ER-F-2 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI _DRYER WELD HE-A-1 3/16/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD HE-A-2 3/13/2010 VT-1i NRI DRYER WELD HE-B-I 3/16/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD HE-B-2 3/13/2010 VT-i .NRI DRYE -R --WEL -..... ..NRI_DRYER WELD HE-C-i 3/16/2010 VT-I NRI_______ __DRYER WELD HE-D-2 3/14/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD HE-E-1 3/7/2010 VT-1 NRI[ D-R-Y-ER- -W-E.-LD HE-E-2 3/i4/2010 IVT-I NRI_______ ..R- E [ - ...... ........... .-- ...... .... ........ -i .. ......... .......... ......- ..... ........ ........................ ................ ........ ................. ............ DRYER WELD HE-F-2 3/17/2010 1 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD LOWER MID SUPPORT RING 0-180 DEG DRYER WELD LOWER MID SUPPORT RING 180 -360 DEG 3/21/2010 jVT-1 NRI NRI 3/17/2010 VT-1 DRYER WELD PLATE TO R IN G .*.0 D E G *. ...................... DRYER WELD PLATE TO RING 0 DEG INTERIOR 3/1.4/2.0i.l .0-3/22/2010 VT-I VT-I NR. I ............... NRI I DRYER WELD PLATE TO RING 180 DEG 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI Page 8 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results UKYI-K VVI-LU I-L/AItI-IU RING 180 DEG INTERIOR DRYER WELD SKIRT 135 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT 225 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT 315 DEG 3/21/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/10/2010 VT-I NRI 311312010 VT-rlI NRI 17 DRYER WELD SKIRT 45 LDG DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL TO LOWER RING 0 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL TO LOWER RING 180 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL 0 DEG LEFT DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL 0 DEG RIGHT DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL 0 DEG RIGHT DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL 180 DEG LEFT DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL 180 DEG RIGHT DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL TO MID RING 0 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT PANEL TO MID RING 180 DEG I DRYER WELD SKIRT 1 RING 0-180 DEG DRYER WELD SKIRT RING 180-360 DEG DRYER WELD SN-B-1 DRYR WEDSN-B- I INTERIOR DRYER WELD SN-B-2 SDRYER WELD SN-B-2 JINTERIOR DRYER WELD SN-C-I DRYER WELD SN-C-I!INTERIOR L ..DR Y. ER .. ..... ..2 ......W. .S..............N.2 ..3/6/2010 VT-I..... ! ..-. ....... .....3/14/2010 VT-"-1 3/14/2010 VT-1 3/14/2010 VT-i 3/8/2010 VT-i_3/8/20i10 VT-i 3/16/2010 VT-I 3/13/2010 VT-I 3 ...1 .......................... .3 ........ ......3... .3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI 3 small IGSCC 1245549 cracks.........Use-as-is... ... .. ... ..... ... ... ... .... ... ...... ... .. .... ..3/13/2010 3/14/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 NRI......................... ...... .... ...... .. ..... ........3/21/2010 VT-1 3/21/2010 VT-1 3/1612010 VT-1 NRI.... NRI 3/10/2010; VT-I i NRI....... ... .. ....... ...... .. ... ........ ....... .... ...... ........... .. ... ......S3/10/2010'iVT-1i NRI 3/16/2010 VT-i NRI..... .......... ............................. ........3/720l I. -r1 _NRI S3/10/2010_ Vr-1. ....... _.NRI. .................... ............----------Page 9 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(1) Steam Dryer Inspection Results I UKYl:( WV-LI) :N-L;-Z[INTERIOR i DRYERWELD SN-D-1 DRYE R WELD- S-N --D-i---] DRYER WELD SN-D-1 I INTERIOR DRYER WELD SN-D-2 DRYE WELD SN--D--2'INTERIOR[DRYER WELD SN-E-1[ DRYER WELD SN-E-1 DRYER WELD SN-E-1 INTERIOR 3/10/2010 VT-1I I NRI 3/7/2010 VT-I NR14I ,{ ....... .--,-,.+3/7/2010 3/13/.2010 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI 3/7/2010 31/10/2010-V'T-1 NRI~- -A---VT-1 NRI NRI 3/7/2010 VT-1 DRYER WELD SN-E-2 -3/12/20i0 vT-i NRI .DRYER' WLDj§ SE- ---INTERIOR 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYERWELD TB-AB-1A_ 3/12/2010 VT-I NRI -£DRYER WELD TB-AB-1A 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-.B 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI I ....DRYER WELD TB-AB-1B 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-2A 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-2A 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-2B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI-DRYER WELD TB-AB-2B .3/10/2010 VT-I NRI .DRYER WELD TB-AB-3A 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI I DRYER WELD TB-AB-3A 3/10/2010 VT-1 .NRI DRYERWELD TB-AB-3B-3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-3B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI i DRYER WELD TB-AB-3B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI D R Y E R. W EA...........B -... .........0 0 V..............L. .T. .. ... .. .... .. .... .......................... ........................................................... DRYER WELD TB-AB-4A 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-4B 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-4B 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-5A 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI.... [ 6 i i : i -i ... ..9 6 6 " -........... ... ..................... ............. .. ... .......... .: .......... ................ ...... .................. ......................... ...DRYER WELD TB-AB-5A 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI-D-R --Y E-,R -WE+L-+D -TB- -A-B,--5,--B-- / 12/2-01 V T*--+i- -N-R-I -......DRYER WELD TB-AB-5B 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-6A 3/12/2010 VT-I NRI DRYER WELD TB-AB-6A 3/12/2010 VT-i NI DRYER WELD TB-AB-6B 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI rDRYER__ __DRYERWELD TB-AB-6B 3/i212010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-iA 3/12/2010,t VT-i NRI ___DRYER WELD TB-BC-iA 3/12/2010 VT- +____ 1__ _____DRYER WELD TB-BC-1B DRYER WELD TB-BC-i B DRYER WELD TB-BC-2A 1 DRYER WELD TB-BC-2A DRYER WELD TB-BC-2A DRYER WELD TB-BC-2B 3/12/2010 3/12/2010 3/12/2010 VT-1 VT-i_VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI 3/13/2010 3/12/2010 VT-i NRI VT-1 NRI ,J Page 10 of 17 Unit I License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results I DRYER WELD TB-BC-2B!-DRYER WELD TB-BC-3A DRYER WELD TB-BC-3A I DRYER WELD TB-BC-3B 3/1212010 _V_-I. NRI 311012010 1 vt-1 LNRI 3/10/2010 ] VT-I NRI 3/10/2010 1VT-1I NRI F-- --*--t------- DRYER WELD TB-BC-3B DRYER WELD TB-BC-4A DRYER WELD TB-BC-4.A DRYER WELD TB-BC-4B DRYER WELD TB-BC-4B 3/110/2010 VT-i 3/1012010 ý VT-I 3/10/2010 VT-I 3/10/2010 VT-I NRI NRI 4 --------.--.------ 4 -- F -----'----------~+----.-------------------.-----.' NRI NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-5A DRYER WELD TB-BC-5A DRYER WELD TB-BC-5B 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 3/10/2010 VT-1 VT-1 VT-i NRI NRI NRI.1- 1 ..... ..... .. ............... ... ........... ... ... -.............. ..... .... ............. 1 -DRYER WELD TB-BC-5B VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-6A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYERWELD TB-BC-6A 3/91/2010 VT-1 NRI .DRYER WELD TB-BC-6B 3/10/2010 VT-I NRI .DRYER WELD TB-BC-6B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-7A 13/9/2010 VT-1 NRI[DRYER WELD TB-BC-7A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-7B .. 3/10/20_10 v-i NRIV___ ____ ___DRYER WELD TB-BC-7B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-8A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-8A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-BC-8B 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-.C-1A 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-2A 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI[DRYER WELD TB-CD-I B .3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-lB 3/10/2010 VT-1 __NRI DRYERWELD TB-CD-. A 3/12/2010 VT-i _ NRI D .RYER.WELD TB-CD-3A 3/12/2010 VT-i .NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-2B 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-2B 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI ___DRYER WELD TB-CD-3A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI --DRYERWELDTB-CD-3A -3/91/201-0 V-rl-- NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-3A 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI _ __ _DRYER WELD TB-CD-3B 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI DRYER WELD TB-CD-4A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI I DRYER WELD TB-CD-4A 3/9/20101 VT-I NRI __DRYER WELD TB-CD-5A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI 1 DRYER WELD TB-CD-5B 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI _DRYER WELD TB-CD-5B 3/9/2010 1 VT-I NRI Page 11 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER WELD TB-CD-6A 3/9/2010 vT-i__DRYER WELD TB-CD-6B 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI NRI!DRYER WELD TB-CD-6B 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI __ _DRYER WELD TB-DE-1A 3/8/2010 VT-1i NRI. ...DRYER WELD TB-DE-1A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYERWELD TB-DE-1A 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI -I DRYER WELD TB-DE-1B 3/8/2010 VT-1 NRI _ ' _ _DRYER WELD TB-DE-1B 3/8/2010 VT-1 NRI WELDV ...DE-*.3/8/2010.VT--]----.... --............... DRYER WELD TB-DE-2A 3/8/2010 VT-I NRI ___ _.. ......... .. ... ..... ............. .................... ......................... .......... ..... .... .......... ................... ......... ...... ........ ... ........ .. ............. ... -........ ... .... .... ... ....DRYER WELD TB-DE-2A 3/8/2010 VT"1-I .............. NRI__ __ -DRYER WELD TB-DE-2B 3/8/2010 VT-I NRI ! _ _DRYER WELD TB-DE-3A 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI .DRYER WELD TB-DE-3A 3/9/2010 VrT- NRI ..... ........... ........ -- -- ......... ...,2 :i " ... .. ....... .. ... ...i~~i DRYER WELD TB-DE-3B 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI _i__ -DRYER WELD T.B-DE-3B
- 3. VT-I N DRYER WELD TB-DE-4A 3/8/2010 VT-I'NRI DRYER WELD TB-DE-4A.....i ..w....i3: E.. I..............
..D.R-YEýR WEL.D -TýB.-.DIEý-,4..B DRYER WELD TB-DE-4B DRYER WELD TB-DE-5A DRYER WELD TB-DE-5A 3/8/2010.....3./.8/"2.0-10 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 VT-1.... ... i ......... ...vr-1 VT-I NRI NRI NRI NRI v-r1 NRI.DRYER WELD TB-DE-5B I DRYER WELD TB-DE-5B DRYER WELD TB-DE-6A DRYER WELD TB-DE-6A DRYER WELD TB-DE-6B 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 VT-1 VT-I VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 VT-1-_-.V _: .................. VT-i VT-i VT-I_.N ,R !.. ... .... ............. NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI..N R ............ ..... ........... NRI NRI NRI..... .... .. ........ ...... .DR .ERY ........ .... .E ...T B-D E_ .6. B ....DRYER WELD TB-DE-7A DRYER WELD TB-DE-7A DRYER WELD TB-DE-7B DRYER WELD TB-DE-7B DRYER WELD TB-DE-8A DRYER WELD TB-DE-8A DRYER WELD TB-DE-8B 3/9/2010 VTr-1 NRI................... ..... ........ i 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 3/8/2010 VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI DRYER WELD TB-DE-8B DRYER WELD TB-EF-1A DRYER WELD TB-EF-1A 3/8/2010 VT-1 DRYER WELD TB-EF-1 B 3/7/2010 VT-1 DRYER WELD TB-EF-1B 3/7/2010 VT.- -I DRYER WELD TB-EF-2A 3/8/2010 VT-1 DRYER WELD TB-EF-2A 3/8/2010 VT-1 F T 1........................--.--.--. DRYER WELD TB-EF-2B [ 3/7/2010 [VT-1 Page 12 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER WELD TB-EF-3A DRYER WELD TB-EF-3A DRYER WELD TB-EF-3B 3/8/2010 v NT--3/8/ "2010 vT-r-_3/8/2010 o -i__.3/8/2010 VT-1............... t NRI NRI NRI 4" 4" DRYER WELD TB-EF-3B DRYER WELD TB-EF-4A DRYER WELD TB-EF-4A NRI NRI+... ..... .......... 3/8/2010 i VT-'i-NRI NRI DRYER WELD TB-EF-4B DRYER WELD TB-EF-4B DRYER WELD TB-EF-5A DRYER WELD TB-EF-5B DRYER WELD TB-EF-5B 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2010 3/8/2 010 VT-1.SVT-i_VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI DRYER WELD TB-EF-6A DRYER WELD TB-EF-6A DRYER WELD TB-EF-6B DRYER WELD TB-EF-6B 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI--I ______, 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI DRYER WELD VS-A-1 3/DRYER WELD VS-A-1 3/DRYER WELD VS-A-1 INTERIOR 3/DRYER WELD VS-A-2 3/1 DRYER WELD VS-A-2 INTERIOR 3/DRYERWELD VS-B-1 3/9/2010 VT-1 9/2010 VT-1 7/2010 VT-I NRI NRI NRI NRI 0/2010 9/2010 9/2010 VT-1 JV T-1 NRI-_________T-1 NRI DRYER WELD VS-B-1 INTERIOR DRYER WELD VS-B-1 INTERIOR DRYER WELD VS-B-2 DRYER WELD VS-B-2 INTERIOR DRYER WELD VS-C-1 DRYER WELD VS-C-i INTERIOR DRYER WELD VS-C-2 DRYER WELD VS-C-2 INTERIOR 3/7/2010 3/7/2010 3/10/2010 3/9/2010 3/7/2010 3/7/2010 3/13/2010 VT-I NRI VT-II NRI VT-1i NRI VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI.................................................. ... ... .. ... .. ... .3/9/2010 NRI DRYER WELD VS-D-i-1 3/9/2010 VT-I NRI .I......DRYER WELD VS-D-1 INTERIOR 3/7/2010 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD VS-D-2 3/13/2010 !VT-i NRI DRY'{ER WELD VS-D-2 .INTERIOR 3/9/2010 1 VT-1 NRI DRYER WELD VS-E-1 3/6/2010 VT-1 NRI i DRYER WELD VS-E-1 , _INTERIOR 3/7/2010 VT-1i NRI _i DRYER WELD VS-E-2 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI I i Page 13 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER WELD VS-F-1 INTERIOR DRYER WELD VS-F-2 INTERIOR_ _____DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD A 0 DEG 3/9/2010 Vr-1i_3/7/2010 Vr-1 3/72/2010 vr-i 3/2/01 VT.. .. -I.......NRI-NR I 3/12/2010 VT-I 3/8/2010 DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD A 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN.P.P. E_ H O ..A. .... ... 0 G. .E. ...E....... ........... ......DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD A 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD A 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD A 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD B 0 DEG--. .. ..P E .... _.... o .... E G... ... ..... .............. DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD B 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD B 0 DEG 3/8/2010..3/9/.20..1..0..10 3/9/2010 VT-1 VT-1 i .......... V17-1 NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI NRI 3/10/2010 1T-11 3/10/2010 VT-1 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 VT-I..N.RI.VT-1 NRI VT-1 NRI 3/9/2010 DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD B 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD B 180_DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 0 DEG 3/10/2010 VT-1 i NRI 3/10/20._0 3/10/2010 3/9/2010 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 180 DEG 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI 3/9/2010 j VT-1 NRI DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD C 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 0 DEG 1 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 3/912010 L3/10/2010 VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI VT-I NRI Vr-1 NRI Page 14 of 17 Unit I License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 0 DEG 3/10/2010 NRI DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 0 DEG 3/10/2010 VT-I NRI I I-i --4 4---- 4----DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD D 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 80 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD E 180 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD F 0 DEG DRYER WELDS DRAIN DRYER WELDS DRAIN PI.PEP H.0OD...F-9 .E.G .H.OO DEG .................. DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD F 180 DEG VT-i jNRI 3/9/2010 3/9/2010 VT-1 NRI NRI 3/9/2010 VT-I 3/10/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 NI 3/10/2010 3/11/2010 VT-1 3/9/2010 VT-I 3/9/2010 VT-I 3/9/2010 VT'-I NRIt-SI'd r~l NRI NRI---4--- -4 3/11/2010 VT-1..3./ 11/2-01 y-i 3/9(2010 VT-i NRI I NRI NRI NRI 1 ......... .. ...DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD F 180 DEG 3/9/2010 1 VT-1 NRI----4----., DRYER WELDS DRAIN PIPE HOOD F 180 DEG DRYER WELDS HOOD B UPPER HORIZONTAL DRYER WELDS HOOD C UPPER HORIZONTAL 3/9/2010 VT-i NRI 3/19/2010 VT-1 NRI 3 0 -I II 3/20/2010 VT-1I NRI--4---DRYER WELDS HOOD D UPPER HORIZONTAL DRYER WELDS HOOD E UPPER HORIZONTAL DRYER WELDS HOOD E UPPER HORIZONTAL STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE A-B 3/20/2010 3/17/2010-3/.2.3-/"2.0.1.0.I VT-iI. NRI VT-1I NRI IVT-i I NRI INRI 3/13/2010 VT-1 Page 15 of 17 Unit I License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results 0 , 1 -m Ur/' , l I r -.r- I::p' l o.r-PLATE A-B STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE C-B rSTEAM DRYER BASE 1 PLATE C-B 3/14/2010 j VT-1 NRI 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI NRI 3/14/2010
- j. VTQ_-I STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE D-E STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE D-E STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE E-F STEAM DRYER BASE PLATE E-F STEAM DRYER HOOD A TROUGH STEAM DRYER HOOD A TROUGH STEAM DRYER HOOD A!TROUGH r STEAM DRYER HOOD B TROUGH STEAM DRYER HOOD B T 1--1RO 1U.1G- H. .............................
..... ... ....STEAM DRYER HOOD C TROUGH 3/13/2010 VT-I NRI NRI 3/14/2010 3/12/2010 VT-1 VT-1 __NRI 3/14/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 v--1 NRI NRI NRI 3/12/2010 VT-1 3/15/2010 3/13/2010 3/13/2010 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI VT-1 NRI VT-1 VT-1 NRI NRI STEAM DRYER HOOD C!TROUGH 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI I STEAM DRYER HOOD D TROUGH -.3/1-3/2010 V1 NRI STEAM DRYER HOOD D TROUGH 3/14/2010 -VT-1 NRI ............ .........STEAM DRYER HOOD E!TROUGH 3/13/2010 VT-1 NRI -STEAM DRYER HOOD i'TROUGH 3/14/2010 1 VT-1 NRI STEAM DRYER HOOD F TROUGH STEAM DRYER HOOD F TROUGH TRANS BRACE STRANkS BRACE 3/13/2010 VT-_NRI NRI 3/13/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 VT-1 NRI LTRANS BRACE[-TRANS BRACE TRANS BRACE fTRANS BRACE 3/12/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 VT-1 3/12/2010 VT'-I-I---- H --NRI NRI NRI NRI I Page 16 of 17 Unit 1 License Condition 2.C(36)(f) Steam Dryer Inspection Results~m4I~ /b -2/- /0 Prepared by: Review by: Fred Habib / Date IVVI Engineer Scott Sienkiewicz / Date Supervisor -NDE-SSES/,,- x /K.,cyw~ /Approved by: Mark Mjaatvedt / Date Mgr -Nuclear Design Engineering77N.ilu.) \,,j 7]j2 10 Page 17 of 17}}