IR 05000219/2011502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 75: Line 75:
===4. OTHER ACTTVTTTES (OA)4OA1 Performance ===
===4. OTHER ACTTVTTTES (OA)4OA1 Performance ===


lndicator Verification (71151- 3 Samples)a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed data for the Oyster Creek EP Pls, which are: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP); (2) ERO Drill Participation; and, (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability.
lndicator Verification (71151- 3 Samples)a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed data for the Oyster Creek EP Pls, which are:
: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);
: (2) ERO Drill Participation; and,
: (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability.


The last NRC EP inspection at Oyster Creek was conducted in the third quarter of 2010, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills, tr.aining records, and equipment tests from the third calendar quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2Q11, to verify the accuracy of the reported Pl data. The review of these performance indicators (Pls) was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02,"Regulatory Assessment Performance lndicator Guidelines," Revision 6.This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples on an annual cycle.Enclosure b.3 Findinqs No findings were identified.
The last NRC EP inspection at Oyster Creek was conducted in the third quarter of 2010, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills, tr.aining records, and equipment tests from the third calendar quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2Q11, to verify the accuracy of the reported Pl data. The review of these performance indicators (Pls) was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02,"Regulatory Assessment Performance lndicator Guidelines," Revision 6.This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples on an annual cycle.Enclosure b.3 Findinqs No findings were identified.

Revision as of 09:48, 18 September 2018

IR 05000219-11-502; 09/26/2011 - 09/29/2011; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Exercise Evaluation; Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes; Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators
ML113130149
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 11/09/2011
From: Trapp J M
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Pacilio M J
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR-11-502
Download: ML113130149 (11)


Text

UNITED STATES N UCLEAR REGU LATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PA 19406-1415 fiovember 9, 2011 Mr. Michael Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, lL 60555 OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE _ INSPECTION REPORT NO. 0500021912U1542

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On September 29, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the September 27, 2011, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 29,2011, with Mr. R. Peak, Oyster Creek Plant Manager, and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.3g}of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,?n1"4l-James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety November 9,2011 Mr. Michael Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, lL 60555

SUBJECT: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO. 0500021912011502

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On September 29,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the September 27,2011, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Oyster Creek Nuclear. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 29,2011, with Mr. R. Peak, Oyster Creek Plant Manager, and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license, The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencynvide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ SUNSI Review Complete:

JMT (Reviewe/s Initials)ADAMS ACCESSION NO. Ml113130149 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\Plant Support Branch 1\Barr\EP Ex1 1 Oc\Oyster Creek EP EX2O115O2 neport.dOcX After declaring this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public.indicate in the box: 'C" = Copv without attachmenVenclosure "E" =with attachmenUenclosure "N" = No To receive a coDv of this DATE 11t7t11 Docket No. 50-219 License No. DPR-16

Enclosure:

NRC f nspection Report 0500021912011502 cc Wencl: Distribution via ListServ Distribution w/encl: W. Dean, RA (RIORAMAIL RESOURCE)D. Lew, DRA (RIORAMAIL RESOURCE)D. Roberts, DRP (RIDRPMAlL RESOURCE)D. Ayers, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURCE)C. Miller, DRS (RIDRSMAlL RESOURCE)P. Wilson, DRS (RIDRSMAIL RESOURCE)M. Franke, Rl, OEDO T. Tate, DRP S. Barber, DRP N. Lafferty, DRP A. Dugandzic, DRP L. Kern, DRP J. Kulp, DRP, SRI J. Ambrosini, Rl J. DeVries, AA D. Bearde, DRS RidsNrrPMOysterCreek Resource RidsNrrDorllpl 1 -2 Resource ROPreports Resource J. Trapp, DRS S. Barr, DRS R. Kahler, NSIRYEPD S. LaVie, NSIRYEPD Docket No.: License No.: Report No.: Licensee.Facility: Location: Dates: Inspectors:

Approved by: U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 0500021 9 DPR-16 0500021912011502 Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon)Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek)Forked River, New Jersey September 26 - 29,2011 S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), Region l (Lead)S. Lavie, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR)F.Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Specialist, NSIR J. Kulp, Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek, Region I C. Crisden, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

f R 0500021912011502;0912612011 - 0912912011;

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station;Exercise Evaluation;

Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes; Emergency Preparedness Performance I nd icators.This was an announced inspection conducted by three region-based and two headquarters-based inspectors.

No findings of significance were identified.

The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight ProceSS," Revision 4, dated December 2006.

Cornerstone: Emergency

Preparedness A. NRC-ldentifiedandSelf-RevealinqFindinqs No findings were identified.

B. Licensee-ldentified Findinos None.Enclosure

REPORT DETAILS

1. REACTOR SAFEW Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness (EP)1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01-1 Sample)a. Inspection Scope Prior to the September 27, 2011, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Oyster Creek Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)50.47(bX14).

This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:. The adequacy of Exelon's performance in the biennialfull-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the risk-significant planning standards (RSPS)described in 10 CFR 50.47(bX4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; and protective action recommendations, respectively.. The overall adequacy of Exelon's Oyster Creek emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, "Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities," and Emergency Plan commitments.

The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center (TSC), Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and the Joint Information Center (JlC).r A review of other performance areas, such as: the Oyster Creek emergency response organization's (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control; intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.

o A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Oyster Creek EP exercise inspection report and Exelon's Oyster Creek EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the September 27 , 2011, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).. The licensee's post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelon's self-assessment of its ERO performance during the September 27, 2011, Oyster Creek exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section lV.F.2.g.The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.Enclosure 2 b. Findinqs No findings were identified.

1EP4 Emerqencv Action Level and Emeroencv Plan Chanqes (71114.04 - 1 Sample)a. Inspection Scope Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, in August 2010, Exelon implemented various revisions of the different sections of the Exelon Oyster Creek Emergency Plan. Exelon had determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), any change made to the Plan, and its lower{ier implementing procedures, had not resulted in any decrease in effectiveness of the Plan, and that the revised Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR 50. The inspectors reviewed all emergency action level (EAL) changes that Exelon had made since August 2010, and conducted a sampling review of other Emergency Plan changes, including the changes to lower-tier emergency plan implementing procedures, to evaluate for any potential decreases in effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. However, this review was not documented in an NRC Safety Evaluation Report and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes. Therefore, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.b. Findinqs No findings were identified.

4. OTHER ACTTVTTTES (OA)4OA1 Performance

lndicator Verification (71151- 3 Samples)a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed data for the Oyster Creek EP Pls, which are:

(1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);
(2) ERO Drill Participation; and,
(3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability.

The last NRC EP inspection at Oyster Creek was conducted in the third quarter of 2010, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills, tr.aining records, and equipment tests from the third calendar quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2Q11, to verify the accuracy of the reported Pl data. The review of these performance indicators (Pls) was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02,"Regulatory Assessment Performance lndicator Guidelines," Revision 6.This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples on an annual cycle.Enclosure b.3 Findinqs No findings were identified.

Meetinqs.

Includinq Exit On September 29, 2011, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. R. Peak, Oyster Creek Plant Manager, and other members of the Exelon staff.No proprietary information was provided to the inspectors during this inspection.

A-1 ATTACHMENT

=SUPPLEMENTAL

INFORMATION=

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

M. Chanda, Oyster Creek Emergency

Preparedness

Manager

V. Cwietniewicz, Exelon Mid-Atlantic

Corporate

Emergency

Preparedness

Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS

REVIEWED Section 1EPl: Exercise Evaluation

gP+A-1990, Exelon Nuclear Standardized Emergency Plan (Revision

20)EP-M-1010, Oyster Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan Annex (Revision
3)Exelon Nuclear Emergency Plan lmplementing

Procedures

Oyster Creek September
27,2011, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package Oyster Creek Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, January 2010 - August 2011 Condition Reports generated as a result of the September
27,2011, Exercise (As documented in Oyster Creek 2011 Graded Exercise Evaluation Report, dated October 26,2011)

Section 1EP4: Emerqencv

Action Level and Emersencv Plan Chanqes gP-nn-tOO0, Exelon Nuclear Standardized Emergency Plan (Revision
20)EP-AA-1010, Oyster Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan Annex (Revision
3)EP-AA-120, Emergency Plan Administration (Revision
13)EP-
AA-120-1001, 10
CFR 50.54(q) Change Evaluation (Revision
6)LS-AA-104, Exelon 50.59 Review Process (Revision
6)Emergency Plan Change Packages: 1 0-08; 1 0-1 01 ; 1 0-1 03; 1 0-1 20; 1 1 -Q3; 1 1 -1 1 ; I 1 -25; 1 1 -40 I 1 -45; 1 1 -47 ; I 1 -54; 1 1 -61 Section 4OA1 : Performance lndicator Verification
EP-AA-125-1001, EP Performance Indicator Guidance (Revision
6)Alert Notification System Pl data, July 2010 - June 201 1 DEP Pl data, July 2010 - June 2011 ERO Drill Participation Pl data, July 2010 - June 201 1 Attachment
ANS CR DEP EAL EOF EP ERO Jrc NEI NRC oc osc PI RSPS TSC A-2

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Alert Notification

System Condition

Report Drill and Exercise Performance

Emergency

Action Level Emergency

Operations

Facility Emergency

Preparedness

Emergency

Response Organization

Joint Information

Center Nuclear Energy Institute Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Oyster Creek Operations

Support Center Performance

lndicator Risk Significant

Planning Standard Technical

Support Center Attachment