SVPLTR 05-0029, Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 19 Revision 2

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 19 Revision 2
ML052080143
Person / Time
Site: Dresden Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/2005
From: Bost D
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SVPLTR: #05-0029
Download: ML052080143 (25)
v • d • e


Text

Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Exekun.

Dresden Nuclear Power Station Nuclear 65oo North Dresden Road Morris, IL 60450-9765 July 19, 2005 SVPLTR: #05-0029 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington D.C. 20555-0001 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-19 NRC Docket No. 50-237

Subject:

Core Operating Limits Report for Cycle 19 Revision 2 The purpose of this letter is to transmit Revision 2 of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Dresden Nuclear Power Station (DNPS) Unit 2 operating cycle 19 (D2C19) in accordance with Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5, "CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)."

Revision 2 of the Unit 2 COLR replaces Revision 1 in its entirety. This revision incorporates a new Reference 28, a revision to Note 5 in Section 5 of the D2C19 COLR concerning plant operation with one turbine pressure regulator out of service, and a number of editorial changes.

Revision 2 does not contain proprietary information subject to 10 CFR 2.390 and 10 CFR 9.17 exemption requirements.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. P. Salas at (815) 416-2800.

Respectfully, Danny Bost Site Vice President Dresden Nuclear Power Station

Attachment:

COLR for Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19, Revision 2 cc: Regional Administrator - NRC Region IlIl NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden Nuclear Power Station

COLR Dresden 2 Revision 1 Core Operating Limits Report for Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................. iii References..... ..........................................................

.......................................................... iv Terms and Definitions ................................................................. vi

1. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (3.2.1, 3.4.1) .1-1 1.1 Technical Specification Reference .1-1 1.2 Description .1-1
2. Minimum Critical Power Ratio (3.2.2, 3.4.1, 3.7.7). 2-1 2.1 Technical Specification Reference .2-1 2.2 Description .2-1
3. Linear Heat Generation Rate (3.2.3) .3-1 3.1 Technical Specification Reference .3-1 3.2 Description .3-1
4. Control Rod Withdrawal Block Instrumentation (3.3.2.1) .4-1 4.1 Technical Specification Reference .4-1 4.2 Description .4-1
5. Allowed Modes of Operation (B 3.2.2, B 3.2.3) . .5-1
6. Methodology (5.6.5) .. 6-1 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 hi Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I List of Tables Table 1-1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) for all ATRIUM-9B Fuel 1-1 Table 1-2 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) for all GE14 Fuel 1-1 Table 2-1 MCPR Option A Based Operating Limits 2-3 Table 2-2 MCPR Option B Based Operating Limits 2-4 Table 2-3 MCPRp for GE and SPC Fuel 2-5 Table 24 MCPRF limits for all fuel types and all operating conditions except TCV Stuck Closed 2-6 Table 2-5 MCPRF limits for all fuel types with a TCV Stuck Closed 2-6 Table 3-1 LHGR Limits for all ATRIUM-9B Fuel 3-1 Table 3-2 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 16, 28, and 29 3-1 Table 3-3 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 17, 31, and 32 3-2 Table 3-4 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 19, 38, and 39 3-2 Table 3-5 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 20, 41, and 42 3-3 Table 3-6 LHGR Limits for Bundle Type 47 3-3 Table 3-7 LHGRFACp for all fuel types 3-4 Table 3-8 LHGRFACF multipliers 3-5 Table 3-9 LHGRFACF multipliers for Turbine Control Valve Stuck Closed 3-5 Table 3-10 LHGR SLO Multipliers for All Fuel Types 3-6 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 iii Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I References

1. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Docket No. 50-237, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-19.
2. Letter from D. M. Crutchfield to All Power Reactor Licensees and Applicants, Generic Letter 88-16; Concerning the Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits from Tech Specs, October 3, 1988.
3. GNF Document, 'Supplemental Reload Licensing Report for Dresden Unit 2 Reload 18 Cycle 19", 0000-0016-1235-SRLR, Revision 0, September 2003.
4. Exelon Calculation Note, "MICROBURN Steady State LHGR Limit Curve Generation for GE-14 Fuel (D2C18)", BNDD:01-008, May 30,2001.
5. Exelon TODI, 'DRESDEN 2 and 3 QUAD CITIES 1 and 2 Equipment Out-Of-Service and Legacy Fuel Transient Analysis", GE-NE-J 11-03912-00-01-R2, TODI NFM01 00091 Sequence 02, September 2003.
6. GE Document, "Instrument Setpoint Calculation Nuclear Instrumentation Rod Block Monitor Dresden 2 & 3", GE DRF C51-00217-01, December 15,1999.
7. Exelon TODI, 'OPL-3 Parameters for Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 Transient Analysis", TODI NF0300049 Sequence 00, June 20, 2003.
8. Exelon TODI, 'Fuel Mechanical Design Report Exposure Extension for ATRIUM-9B Fuel Assemblies at Dresden, Quad Cities, and LaSalle Units", EMF-2563(P) Revision 1, TODI NFM01 00107 Sequence 0, August 2001.
9. Exelon NDIT, "Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 17 Reload Analysis", NDIT NFM9900187, Sequence 01, EMF-2275 Revision 1, November 1999.
10. Exelon Calculation Note, 'Determination of Generic MCPRF Limits", BNDG:02-001, Revision 0, May 17, 2002.
11. General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR II) and US supplement, NEDE-2401 1-P-A-14, June 2000.
12. Exelon Letter from Carlos de la Hoz to Doug Wise and Alex Misak, 'Approval of GE Evaluation of MSIV out of Service for Dresden and Quad Cities", NFM-MW:02-0274, dated August 2, 2002.
13. Exelon TODI, "Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 FRED Form", TODI NFM0300038 Revision 2, August 8, 2003.
14. GE Document, "ICA Stability Evaluation for Dresden Unit 2 C19', GE-NE-0000-0020-4496-R1, October 2003.
15. GNF Letter, "Single Loop Operation (SLO) LHGR Limits", TGO:03-008, May 30, 2003.
16. Exelon TODI, "SAFERIGESTR - LOCA Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis for Dresden Nuclear Station 2 and 3 and Quad Cities Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2", NEDC-32990P, Revision 2, September 2003, TODI NFM01 00086, Sequence 02, October 2003.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 IV Revision 2

COLR Drcsdcn 2 Revision I

17. Exelon Letter from Carlos de la Hoz to Doug Wise and Alex Misak, 'Approval of GE Evaluation of Dresden and Quad Cities Pressure Regulator Out of Service Analysis," NF-MW:02-0413, October22, 2002.
18. GNF Letter from F. R. Lindquist to A. Giancatarino, 'Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 18 Safety Limit MCPR Change," FRL03DR2-003, February 21, 2003.
19. GNF Letter from R. Lindquist to J. Nevling, "TSD NFM-MW-B115 D2C18 CBH Impact from Withdrawing 1OB Rods", FRL03DR2-001 1, dated January 9, 2003.
20. Exelon Calculation Note, 'D2C19 Core Operating Limits Report Creation", BNDD:03-021, October 14, 2003.
21. Exelon Calculation Note, "D2C19 Fuel Type based LHGR Limits for Fresh Fuel" (D2C1 9), BNDD:03-022 Rev. 0, October 9, 2003.
22. GNF Letter from R. Lindquist to J. Neviing, "Dresden and Quad Cities Equipment Out of Service (EOOS) Interpretation Letter", FRL02EX-01 1, dated September 6, 2002.
23. Exelon Letter from Candice Chou to Alex Misak and Doug Wise, "Dresden and Quad Cities Operation with one TSV OOS", NF-MW:03-069, July 28, 2003.
24. Exelon Letter from Carlos de la Hoz to Doug Wise and Alex Misak, "Approval of GE evaluation of Dresden and Quad Cities Extended Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction," NF-MW:02-0081, August 27, 2002.
25. GE Document, GE-NE-0000-0034-6539-R0, "Dresden/Quad Cities Clarification on Required Turbine Bypass Capacity for PRC 04-23 Issue," November 17, 2004.
26. GNF Letter from M. Mneimneh to H. Kim, "Exelon Power Load Unbalance (PLU)

Evaluation - Final," MJM-EXN-EXO-04-038, November 22, 2004.

27. GE Document, GE-NE-0000-0023-0064-R0, "Technical Assessment of the Effects of RWCU Flow on Core Inlet Enthalpy for the Dresden Generating Station," November 2003.
28. Exelon Engineering Change #356168, "Operating with a Pressure Regulator Out of Service for Dresden 2," June 29, 2005.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 v Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision 1 Terms and Definitions APLHGR Average planar linear beat generation rate APRM Average power range monitor ATRIUM-9B ATRIUM-9B fuel BOC Beginning of cycle DLO Dual loop operation EOC End of cycle EOOS Equipment out of service EOR End of rated conditions (i.e. cycle exposure at 100% power, 100% flow, all-rods-out)

FWVHOOS Feedwater heater out of service FW Feedwater GE14 GE14C fuel GNF Global Nuclear Fuel ICF Increased core flow LHGR Linear heat generation rate LHGRFACF Flow dependent LHGR multiplier LHGRFACp Power dependent LHGR multiplier LPRM Local power range monitor MAPLHGR Maximum average planar linear heat generation rate MCPR Minimum critical power ratio MCPRF Flow dependent MCPR MCPRp Power dependent MCPR OLMCPR Operating limit minimum critical power ratio PLUOOS Power load unbalance out of service PROOS Pressure regulator out of service RBM Rod block monitor SLMCPR Safety limit minimum critical power ratio SLO Single reactor recirculation loop operation SPC Siemens Power Corporation SRVOOS Safety-relief valve out of service TBPOOS Turbine bypass valve out of service TCV Turbine control valve TIP Traversing Incore Probe TSV Turbine Stop Valve Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 vi Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I

1. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1.1 Technical Specification

Reference:

Sections 3.2.1 and 3.4.1.

1.2

Description:

Tables 1-1 and 1-2 are used to determine the maximum average planar linear heat generation rate (MAPLHGR) limit for each fuel type. Limits listed in Tables 1-1 and 1-2 are for Dual Reactor Recirculation Loop Operation.

For Single Reactor Recirculation Loop Operation (SLO), the MAPLHGR limits given in Tables 1-1 and 1-2 must be multiplied by a SLO MAPLHGR multiplier.

The SLO MAPLHGR multiplier for SPC fuel is 0.84 (Reference 3 Section 16).

The SLO MAPLHGR multiplier for GE14 fuel is 0.77 (Reference 3 Section 16).

Table 1-1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) for all ATRIUM-9B Fuel ATRM9-P9HATB371-13GZ-SPC100T-9WR-144-T6-3912 ATRM9-P9HATB371-13GZ-SPCIOOT-9WR-144-T6-3914 (Bundles 3912 and 3914 - bundle types 6 and 7)

- (Reference 3 Section 16 )

Planar Average Exposure MAPLHGR (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.52 17.25 13.52 44.09 10.73 70.00 7.84 Table 1-2 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) for all GE14 Fuel GE14-P 1OHNAB408-16GZ-1GOT-145-T6-2483 GE14-PI OHNAB411 -4G7.0/9G6.0-1GOT-145-T6-2484 GE14-PI ODNAB418-16GZ-1GOT-145-T6-2646 GE14-P1 ODNAB389-18GZ-1OOT-145-T6-2650 (Bundles 2483, 2484, 2646 and 2650, bundle types 16,17,19,20, 28, 29, 31, 32, 38,39,41, 42 and 47)

(Reference 3 Section 16)

Planar Average Exposure MAPLHGR (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.00 11.68 16.00 11.68 55.12 8.02 63.50 6.97 70.00 4.36 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 1-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I

2. Minimum Critical Power Ratio 2.1 Technical Specification

Reference:

Sections 3.2.2, 3.4.1 and 3.7.7.

2.2

Description:

The various MCPR limits are described below.

2.2.1 Manual Flow Control MCPR Limits The Operating Limit MCPR (OLMCPR) Is determined from either section 2.2.1.1 or 2.2.1.2, whichever is greater at any given power and flow condition.

2.2.1.1 Power-Dependent MCPR For operation at less than 38.5% core thermal power, the OLMCPR as a function of core thermal power is shown in Table 2-3. For operation at greater than 38.5% core thermal power, the OLMCPR as a function of core thermal power Is determined by multiplying the applicable EOOS condition limit shown In Table 2-1 or 2-2 by the applicable MCPR multiplier Kp given in Table 2-

3. For operation at exactly 38.5% core thermal power, the OLMCPR as a function of core thermal power Is the higher of either of the two aforementioned methods evaluated at exactly 38.5% core thermal power.

2.2.1.2 Flow-Dependent MCPR Tables 2-4 and 2-5 provide the MCPRF limit as a function of flow.

The MCPRF limit determined from these tables Is the flow dependent OLMCPR.

2.2.2 Automatic Flow Control MCPR Limits Automatic Flow Control MCPR Limits are not provided.

2.2.3 Option A and Option B Option A and Option B refer to scram speeds.

Option A scram speed Is the Improved Technical Specification scram speed. The core average scram speed insertion time for 20% Insertion must be less than or equal to the Technical Specification Scram Speed to utilize Option A MCPR limits. Reload analyses performed by Global Nuclear Fuel (GNF) for Cycle 19 Option A MCPR limits utilized a 20%

core average Insertion time of 0.900 seconds (Reference 7).

To utilize the MCPR limits for the Option B scram speed, the core average scram insertion time for 20% insertion must be less than or equal to 0.694 seconds (Reference 7). If the core average scram insertion time does not meet the Option B criteria, but is within the Option A criteria, the appropriate MCPR value may be determined from a linear Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 2-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I interpolation between the Option A and B limits with standard mathematical rounding to two decimal places. When performing a linear interpolation to determine MCPR limits, ensure that the time used for Option A is 0.900 seconds, which is the 20% insertion time utilized by GNF in the reload analysis.

2.2.4 Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Settings Cycle 19 was analyzed with a maximum core flow runout of 110%;

therefore the Recirculation Pump Motor Generator scoop tube mechanical and electrical stops must be set to maintain core flow less than 110% (107.8 Mlb/hr) for all runout events (Reference 13 Section 15). This value is consistent with the analyses of Reference 5.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 2-2 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table 2-1 MCPR Option A Based Operating Limits (Reference 3 Cycle Exposure EOOS Combination Fuel Type <EOR -1385 2 EOR' -1385

_ MWdlMT MWd/MT GE14 1.58 1.68 Base Case ATRIUM-9B 1.54 1.64 GE14 1.59 1.69 Base Case SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.55 1.65 GE14 1.75 1.77 TBPOOS ATRIUM-9B 1.69 1.71 GE14 1.76 1.78 TBPOOS SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.70 1.72 GE14 1.60 1.68 TCV Slow Closure ATRIUM-9B 1.54 1.64 GE14 1.61 1.69 TCV Slow Closure SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.55 1.65 GE14 1.64 1.68 PLUMOS ATRIUM-9B 1.59 1.64 GE14 1.65 1.69 PLUOOS SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.60 1.65 GE14 1.58 1.68 TCV Stuck Closed ATRIUM-9B 1.54 1.64 GE14 1.59 1.69 TCV Stuck Closed SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.55 1.65

1. EOR refers to the end of rated power (i.e., 100% power/100% flow operation with all rods out)

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 2-3 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table 2-2 MCPR Option B Based Operating Limits (Reference 3 Cycle Exposure EOOS Combination Fuel Type <EOR' -1385 2 EOR' -1385 MWd/MT MWdtMT GE14 1.47 1.51 Base Case ATRIUM-9B 1.45 1.47 GE14 1.48 1.52 Base Case SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.46 1.48 GE14 1.58 1.60 TBPOOS ATRIUM-9B 1.52 1.54 GE14 1.59 1.61 TBPOOS SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.53 1.55 GE14 1.47 1.51 TCV Slow Closure ATRIUM-9B 1.45 1.47 GE14 1.48 1.52 TCV Slow Closure SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.A6 1.48 GE14 1.47 1.51 PLUMOS ATRIUM-9B 1.45 1.47 GE14 1.48 1.52 PLUOOS SLO ATRIUM-9B 1.46 1.48 GE14 1.47 1.51 TCV Stuck Closed ATRIUM-9B 1.45 1.47 GE14 1.48 1.52 TCV Stuck Closed SLO GE14 1.46 1.48 ATRIUM-9B 1.46 1.48

1. EOR refers to the end of rated power (i.e., 100% power/100% flow operation with all rods out)

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 24 Revision 2

COLR Drcsden 2 Revision I Table 2-3 MCPRp for GE and SPC Fuel (Reference 5 and 18)

Core Thermal Power (% of rated)

Core Flow EOOS Combination

(% of rated) 0 1 25 1 38.5 1 38.5 1 45 1 60 1 70 1 70 100 Operating Limit MCPR Operating Limit MCPR Multiplier, KP Base Case 5 60 3.19 2.61 2.29 1.32 1.28 1.15 1.00

. > 60 3.81 3.01 2.59 Base Case SLO 5 60 3.20 2.62 2.30 1.32 1.28 1.15 1.00

_ > 60 3.82 3.02 2.60 TBPOOS 1 60 5.60 3.81 2.84 1.37 1.28 1.15 1.00

> 60 6.85 4.66 3.48

  • 60 5.61 3.82 2.85 TBPOOS SLO 1.37 1.28 1.15 1.00

>60 6.86 4.67 3.49 TCV Slow Closure S 60 5.60 3.81 2.84 1.64 1.45 1.26 1.11 1.00

> 60 6.85 4.66 3.48 TCV Slow Closure SLO

  • 60 5.61 3.82 2.85 1.64 1.45 1.26 1.11 1.00

> 60 6.86 4.67 3.49 PLUOOS S 60 5.60 3.81 2.84 1.64 1A5 1.26 1.11 1.00

> 60 6.85 4.66 3.48 PLUOOS SLO *60 5.61 3.82 2.85 1.64 1.45 1.26 1.11 1.00

> 60 6.86 4.67 3.49 S60 3.19 2.61 2.29 TCV Stuck Closed . _ 1.32 1.28 1.15 1.00

>60 3.81 3.01 2.59 TCV Stuck Closed SLO l 60 3.20 2.62 2.30 1.32 1.28 1.15 1.00 TCVStuckClosed__LO____ > 60 j 3.82 3.02 2.60 I 1 Notes for Table 2-3:

  • Values are interpolated between relevant power levels.
  • For thermal limit monitoring at greater than 100% core thermal power, the 100% core thermal power multiplier, Kp, should be applied.
  • Allowable EOOS conditions are listed In Section 5.
  • MCRPp limits are independent of scram speed.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 2-5 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table 2-4 MCPRF limits for all fuel types and all operating conditions except TCV Stuck Closed (Reference 10)

Flow (% rated) l MCPRF 110.0 1.22 100.0 1.22 0.0 1.86 Notes for Table 2-4:

  • Values are interpolated between relevant flow values.
  • Rated flow is 98 Mlb/hr.
  • MCRPF limit Is Independent of scram speed.
  • This table is not applicable to TCV Stuck Closed operating conditions.

Table 2-5 MCPRF limits for all fuel types with a TCV Stuck Closed (Reference 10)

Flow (% rated) I MCPRF 110.0 1.27 108.9 1.27 0.0 1.97 Notes for Table 2-5:

  • Values are interpolated between relevant flow values.
  • Rated flow is 98 MlbIhr.
  • MCRPF limit Is Independent of scram speed.
  • This table is only applicable to TCV Stuck Closed operating conditions.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 2-6 Revision 2

COLR Drcsden 2 Revision I

3. Linear Heat Generation Rate 3.1 Technical Specification

Reference:

Section 3.2.3.

3.2

Description:

The linear heat generation rate (LHGR) limit is the product of the LHGR Limit from Tables 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, or 3-6 and the minimum of either the power dependent LHGR Factor, LHGRFACp, the flow dependent LHGR Factor, LHGRFACF or the single loop operation (SLO) multiplication factor. The applicable power dependent LHGR Factor (LHGRFACp) Is determined from Table 3-7. The applicable flow dependent LHGR Factor (LHGRFACF) Is determined from Tables 3-8 and 3-9. The SLO multiplication factor can be found in Table 3-10.

Table 3-1 LHGR Limits for all ATRIUM-9B Fuel ATRM9-P9HATB371-13GZ-SPC100T-9WR-144-T6-3912 ATRM9-P9HATB371-13GZ-SPC100T-9WR-144-T6-3914 (Bundles 3912 and 3914 - bundle types 6, and 7)

(Referenc 8)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 = 14.40 15.00 14.40 64.30 7.90 Table 3-2 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 16, 28, and 29 GE14-P 1OHNAB411 -4G7.019G6.0-1OOT-145-T6-2484 (Bundle 2484, bundle types 16, 28, and 29)

(Reference 4)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.40 12.58 13.40 13.23 13.23 14.33 12.94 15.43 12.81 16.53 12.69 18.74 12.32 22.05 11.81 27.56 11.08 33.07 10.40 38.58 9.75 44.09 9.13 49.60 8.54 55.12 7.97 56.63 7.97 63.03 5.00 64.58 4.90 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table 3-3 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 17, 31, and 32 GE14-PI OHNAB408-16GZ-1 OOT-145-T6-2483 (Bundle 2483, bundle types 17, 31, and 32)

(Reference 4)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWdIMT) (kWlft) 0.00 13.34 2.20 13.35 3.31 13.28 4.41 13.27 7.72 13.27 8.82 13.29 13.07 13.29 13.23 12.96 14.33 12.56 15.43 12.36 16.53 12.20 18.74 11.82 22.05 11.32 27.56 10.52 33.07 9.77 38.58 9.26 44.09 8.77 49.60 8.28 55.12 7.77 58.30 7.77 59.85 7.00 60.63 5.89 63.61 4.49 -

65.87 4.49 Table 3-4 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 19, 38 and 39 GE14-PI ODNAB418-16GZ-1OOT-145-T6-2646 (Bundles 2646, bundle types 19, 38, and 39)

(Reference 21)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MT) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.40 11.79 13.40 55.34 8.00 61.73 5.00 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-2 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision 1 Table 3-5 LHGR Limits for Bundle Types 20, 41, and 42 GE14-Pl ODNAB389-18GZ-1 OOT-145-T6-2650 (Bundles 2650, bundle types 20,41, and 42)

(Reference 21)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWdIMT) (kW/ft) 0.00 13.40 11.27 13.40 54.58 8.00 60.93 5.00 Table 3-6 .

LHGR Limits for Bundle Type 47 GE14-PlOHNAB408-16GZ-100T-145-T6-2483 (Bundle 2483, bundle types 47)

(Reference 4 and 19)

Nodal Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MT) (kWlft) 0.00 12.40 2.20 12.41 3.31 12.35 4.41 12.34 7.72 12.34 8.82 12.35 13.07 12.35 13.23 12.05 14.33 11.68 15.43 11.49 16.53 11.34 18.74 10.99 22.05 10.52 27.56 9.78 33.07 9.08 38.58 8.61 44.09 8.15 49.60 7.70 55.12 7.22 58.30 7.22 59.85 6.51 60.63 5.47 63.61 4.17 65.87 4.17 Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-3 Revision 2

COLR Drcsden 2 Rcvision 1 Table 3-7 LHGRFACp for all fuel types (Reference 5)

Core Core Flow EOOS Combination (%of rated) 0 1 25 1 38.5 I

S60 _ .

Base Case 0.50 0.56 0.59

>60 Base Case SLO 60 60 _ _

0.50 0

0.56

_ _ _ I0 .59 _

0.68 TBOS>60 > 60 0.33 0.22 _____ .2 1043812OS 1 TBPOOS SLO 5 60 0.22 0.39 0.48 0.54 60 0.33 _____ 0.42 ____

S60 __ 0.22 0.48 TCV Slow Closure 0.39

>60 0.33 0.42

560 10.22 0.48 TCV Slow Closure SLO > 60 03 2 0.39 i-- 0.54 0.73 0.78 PLUOOS 60 0.22 0.39 -4 0.54 0.73 0.78

> 60 0.33 .42j 0____j S60 0.22 0.48 PLUOOS SLO -- 1 0.39

>60 0.33 0.42 TCV Stuck Closed 60 0.50 0.56 0.59 0.68

> 60 TCV Stuck Closed SLO :600.50 0.56 0.59 0.68

>60 Notes for Table 3-7:

  • Values are interpolated between relevant power levels.
  • For thermal limit monitoring at greater than 100% core thermal power, the 100% core thermal power LHGRFACp multiplier should be applied.
  • Allowable EOOS conditions are listed in Section 5.
  • LHGRFACp multiplier Is independent of scram speed.
  • The LHGR multiplier for any core power/flow condition is the limiting of the LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, and SLO Multiplier (if applicable)

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-4 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I Table 3-8 LHGRFACF multipliers (Reference 5)

Flow (% rated) LHGRFACF 0 0.28 30 0.55 40 0.64 50 _ 0.77 80 1.00 100 . 1.00 110 1.00 Table 3-9 LHGRFACF multipliers for Turbine Control Valve Stuck Closed (Reference 5)

Flow (% rated) LHGRFACF 0 0.14 30 0.41 40 0.50 50 0.63 80 0.86 98.3 1.00 100 1.00 110 1.00 Notes for Tables 3-8 and 3-9:

  • Values are interpolated between relevant flow values.
  • 98 Mlblhr is rated flow.
  • For thermal limit monitoring above 100% rated core flow, utilize the 100% rated core flow LHGRFACF multiplier.
  • LHGRFACF multipliers are applicable to all fuel types.
  • Table 3-8 Is valid for all operating conditions for all EOOS scenarios except TCV stuck closed.
  • Table 3-9 is valid for all operating conditions with a TCV stuck closed.
  • LHGRFACF multipliers are independent of scram speed.
  • The LHGR multiplier for any core power/flow condition is the limiting of the LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, and SLO Multiplier (if applicable).

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-5 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Rcvision 1 Table 3-1 0 LHGR SLO Multipliers for All Fuel Types (Reference 3, 15 and 16)

Fuel Product Line SLO LHGR Multiplier ATRIUM-9B 0.84 GE-14 0.77 Note for Table 3-10:

  • The LHGR multiplier for any core power/flow condition is the limiting of the LHGRFACp, LHGRFACF, and SLO Multiplier (if applicable).

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 3-6 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision 1

4. Control Rod Withdrawal Block Instrumentation 4.1 Technical Specification

Reference:

Table 3.3.2.1-1 4.2

Description:

The Rod Block Monitor Upscale Instrumentation Setpoints are determined from the relationships shown below (Reference 6):

ROD BLOCK MONITOR UPSCALE TRIP FUNCTION ALLOWABLE VALUE Two Recirculation Loop 0.65 Wd + 55%

Operation0.65 Wd + 51%

Single Recirculation Loop 0.65 Wd + 51 %

I Operation The setpoint may be lower/higher and will still comply with the Rod Withdrawal Event (RWE) Analysis because RWE Is analyzed unblocked.

Wd - percent of drive flow required to produce a rated core flow of 98 Mlb/hr.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 4-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I

5. Allowed Modes of Operation (B 3.2.2, B 3.2.3)

The Allowed Modes of Operation with combinations of Equipment Out-of-Service are as described below:

-OOPERATING REGION=

Equipment Out of Service Standar M C so_

Options1235.7 .8 d MELLLA Coastdown Base Case, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes Base Case SLO, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TBPOOS, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TBPOOS SLO, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TCV Slow Closure, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TCV Slow Closure SLO, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes PLUOOS, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes PLUOOS SLO, Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TCV Stuck Closed 6 , Option A or B Yes Yes Yes TCV Stuck Closed SLO6 , Option A or B Yes Yes Yes 1 Each OOS Option may be combined with up to 18 TIP channels OOS (provided the requirements for utilizing SUBTIP methodology are met) with all TIPS available at startup from a refuel outage and up to 50%

of the LPRMs OOS with an LPRM calibration frequency of 2500 Effective Full Power Hours (EFPH) (2000 EFPH +25%).

2 Additionally, a single MSIV may be taken OOS (shut) under any and all OOS Options, so long as core thermal power is maintained 575% of 2957 MWt (Reference 12).

3 Each EOOS Option except TBPOOS requires the opening profile for the Turbine Bypass Valves provided In Reference 7 to be met. These conditions also support I Turbine Bypass Valve OOS (TBPOOS) if the assumed opening profile (Reference 7) for the remaining 8 Turbine Bypass Valves is met. If the opening profile Is not met with 8 or 9 operating Turbine Bypass Valves, or if two Turbine Bypass Valves are OOS, utilize the TBPOOS condition. For operation with three or more Turbine Bypass Valves OOS, utilize the TBPOOS Condition for operation above 42% rated power and the PLUOOS Condition for operation at or below 42% rated power. (References 25 and 26) 4 Coastdown operation is defined as any cycle exposure beyond the full power, all rods out condition with plant power slowly lowering to a lesser value while core flow is held constant (Reference 11 Section 4.3.1.2.8). Up to a 15% overpower Is analyzed per Reference 5.

5 For operation with pressure regulator out-of-service (PROOS), the TCV slow closure limits should be applied. For operation with a PROOS and TCV slow closure, the TCV slow closure limits are applicable.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 5-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I For operation with a PROOS and PLUOOS, the PLUOOS limits are applicable. (References 17 and 28).

6 Operation with one TSV OOS Is allowed as evaluated In Reference 23. Combination of one TCV OOS and one TSV OOS Is not allowed.

7The cycle specific stability analysis may Impose restrictions on the Power-to-flow map and/or restrict the applicable temperature for feedwater temperature reduction (FWTR).

8 Each EOOS option allows operation with up to a 10F reduction In feedwater temperature (Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction or Feedwater Heaters OOS) throughout the cycle. For operation with reduced feedwater temperature greater than 10OF and less than or equal to 120 0F, the penalties from Reference 27 shall be applied.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 5-2 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I

6. Methodology (5.6.5)

The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, specifically those described In the following documents:

1. ANF-1125 (P)(A) and Supplements I and 2, 'Critical Power Correlation -ANFB," April 1990.
2. ANF-524 (P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, "ANF Critical Power Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," November 1990.
3. XN-NF-79-71 (P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1, 2 & 3, 'Exxon Nuclear Plant Transient Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," March 1986.
4. XN-NF-80-19 (P)(A) Volume I Supplements 1 and 2, 'Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis," March 1993.
5. XN-NF-80-19 (P)(A) Volume 1 Supplement 3, Supplement 3 Appendix F, and Supplement 4, 'Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," November 1990.
6. XN-NF-80-19 (P)(A) Volumes 2, 2A, 2B and 2C, 'Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: EXEM BWR ECCS Evaluation Model," September 1982.
7. XN-NF-80-19 (P)(A) Volume 3 Revision 2, 'Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description," January 1987.
8. XN-NF-80-19 (P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 1, 'Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors:

Application of the ENC Methodology to BWR Reloads," June 1986.

9. XN-NF-85-67 (P)(A) Revision 1, 'Generic Mechanical Design for Exxon Nuclear Jet Pump BWR Reload Fuel," September 1986.
10. ANF-913 (P)(A) Volume I Revision 1, and Volume I Supplements 2, 3, 4, "COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transients Analysis," August 1990.
11. XN-NF-82 (P)(A) Revision 1 and Supplements 2, 4 and 5, "Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel for Extended Burnup," October 1986.
12. XN-NF-82 (P)(A) Supplement 1 Revision 2, "Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel for Extended Burnup Supplement 1 Extended Burnup Qualification of ENC 9x9 BWR Fuel," May 1988.
13. ANF-89-14(P)(A) Revision 1 and Supplements I & 2, "Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Generic Mechanical Design for Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation 9X9 - IX and 9x9 - 9X BWR Reload Fuel,"

October 1991.

14. ANF-89-14(P), "Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Generic Mechanical Design for Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation 9X9 - IX and 9x9 - 9X BWR Reload Fuel," May 1989.
15. ANF-89-98 (P)(A), "Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs," Revision 1 and Revision I Supplement 1, May 1995.
16. ANF-91-048 (P)(A), 'Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors EXEM BWR ECCS Evaluation Model," January 1993.
17. Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report NFSR-0091, "Benchmark of CASMO/MICROBURN BWR Nuclear Design Methods," Revision 0 and Supplements on Neutronics Licensing Analysis Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 6-1 Revision 2

COLR Dresden 2 Revision I (Supplement 1) and La Salle County Unit 2 benchmarking (Supplement 2), December 1991, March 1992, and May 1992, respectively.

18. EMF-85-74 (P) Revision 0 and Supplement 1(P)(A) and Supplement 2(P)(A), 'RODEX2A (BWR) Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model," February 1998.
19. NEDE-24011-P-A-14 Revision 14, 'General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR),"

June 2000.

20. NEDC-32981 P Revision 0, "GEXL96 Correlation for ATRIUM-9B Fuel", September 2000.
21. ANF-1125(P)(A), Supplement 1 Appendix E, 'ANFB Critical Power Correlation Determination of ATRIUM-9B Additive Constant uncertainties," September 1998.
22. ANF-91-048(P)(A), Supplements I and 2, 'BWR Jet Pump Model Revision for RELAX," October 1997.

Dresden Unit 2 Cycle 19 6-2 Revision 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=SVPLTR_05-0029,_Core_Operating_Limits_Report_for_Cycle_19_Revision_2&oldid=2591691"