NOC-AE-03001448, Submittal of Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions for South Texas Project. Includes OPGP05-ZV-0005, Emergency Response Program, Revision 3 & OPGP05-ZV-0010, Emergency Plan Revision, Revision 6
| ML030210114 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 01/06/2003 |
| From: | Serra P South Texas |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| ER 20030000, NOC-AE-03001448, STI: 31540629, Z18 | |
| Download: ML030210114 (24) | |
Text
Nuclear Operating Corpan)
P.a ar289 faswo=b T 77483
.s January 06, 2003 NOC-AE-03001448 STI: 31540629 FILE NO: Z18 ER 20030000 10CFR50.4(b)(5)
IOCFR50 App E U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498; STN 50-499 Changes to Emergency Plan Procedures In accordance with 10CFR50.4(b)(5) and 10CFR50, Appendix E, Section V, the STP Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the attached Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure revisions.
If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact either Mr. Morgan at (361) 972 7004 or me at (361) 972-8053.
P. L. Serra Manager, Plant Protection PLSlmk
Enclosure:
Letter of Receipt Description of Changes OPGP05-ZV-0005, Emergency Response Program, Rev. 3 OPGP05-ZV-0010, Emergency Plan Revision, Rev. 6
V NOC-AE-03001448 STI: 31540629 FILE NO: Z18 ER 20030000 Page 2 cc:
(paper copy) (electronic copy)
Emergency Planning Coordinator (2 copies) A. H. Gutterman, Esquire Regional Administrator, Region IV Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 M. T. Hardt/W. C. Gunst Arlington, Texas 76011-8064 City Public Service U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mohan C. Thadani Attention: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike R. L. Balcom/D. G. Tees Rockville, M1D 20852 Texas Genco LP Richard A. Ratliff A. Ranmirez Bureau of Radiation Control City of Austin Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street C. A. Johnson/A. C. Bakken III Austin, TX 78756-3189 AEP - Central Power and Light Company Cornelius F. O'Keefe Jon C. Wood U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Matthews & Branscomb P. O. Box 289, Mail Code: MN16 Wadsworth, TX 77483 C. M. Canady City of Austin Electric Utility Department 721 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704
W, NOC-AE-03001448 STI: 31540629 FILE NO: Z18 ER 20030000 Page 3 To: P. L. Serra Manager, Emergency Response STP Nuclear Operating Company P. O. Box 289 Wadsworth, TX 77483 From: Emergency Planning Coordinator Region IV Office of the Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064
Subject:
Receipt Acknowledgment for Changes to STP Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure I hereby acknowledge having received changes to the STP Nuclear Operating Company's Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures transmitted by STP letter NOC-AE-03001448.
Signature Date
Description of Changes Procedure OPGP05-ZV-0005, Emergency Response Program, Rev. 3, Editorial corrections, Page 4, step 3.6, changed Information Technology Infrastructure to Manager, Applications & Business Software. Page 4, step 3.7, changed Vice President, Business Services to General Manager, Station Support.
Procedure OPGP05-ZV-0010, Emergency Plan Revision, Rev. 6, Page 2, step 2.1, changed Vice President, Business Services to General Manager, Station Support. Page 4, 4ih star, change review concurrence to approval. Page 4, 5d' star, changed Vice President, Business Services to General Manager, Station Support.
Page 5, step 3.3.1, identifies implementing procedures. Page 5, step 3.3.2, identifies when procedures require PORC review. Page 12, changed Vice President, Business Services to General Manager, Station Support and made other editorial clarifications.
D0527*
STI 31532257 OPGP05-ZV-0005 Rev. 3 Page 1 of 5 Emergency Response Program Quality Non Safety-Related Usage: Available Effective Date: 12/11/02 Max Keyes N/A N/A Emergency Response Division PREPARER TECHNICAL USER COGNIZANT ORGANIZATION Table )fContents Page 1"o Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 Procedure ......................................................................................................... .................................. 4 5.0 References ......................................................................................................................................... 5 6.0 Support Documents ................................................................................................................. 5
Emergency Response Program
1.0 Purpose and Scope
1.1 This procedure provides a coordinated approach to emergency response at the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS).
1.2 The Emergency Response Program is applicable to both onsite and offsite personnel assigned to respond to an event at STPEGS. The scope of this procedure delineates responsibilities for the various elements required to implement an effective and coordinated Emergency Response Program. These elements include:
1.2.1 STPEGS Emergency Plan 1.2.2 Emergency Plan Implementing and Administrative Procedures 1.2.3 Emergency Response Audit and Surveillance Program 1.2.4 Emergency Response Drill and Exercise Program 1.2.5 Emergency Response Training Program 1.2.6 Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment 1.2.7 Emergency Response Organization 1.2.8 Emergency Communication Systems 1.2.9 Prompt Notification System 1.2.10 Public Information and Public Education Program 1.2.11 Emergency Notification and Response System 2.0 Definitions 2.1 Emergency Response Organization (ERO): A designated group of personnel who respond to declared emergencies at the STPEGS.
IIOPGPOS-ZV-0005 Rev. 3 Page 3of 5 I
I Emergency Response Program I 3.0 Responsibilities 3.1 Supervisor, Emergency Response or designee shall:
3.1.1 Maintain the Emergency Plan.
3.1.2 Maintain the Emergency Plan Implementing and Administrative Procedures.
3.1.3 Ensure the Emergency Response Program provides for adequate staff, training, and facilities to comply with current regulatory guidance.
3.1.4 Ensure an adequate Emergency Drill and Exercise Program is maintained.
3.1.5 Ensure necessary revisions to procedures, facilities, staff, and training are accomplished to correct program deficiencies identified during an exercise, drill, audit or surveillance.
3.1.6 Ensure required emergency preparedness training in accordance with the responsibilities in procedure OPGP03-ZT-0139, Emergency Preparedness Training Program.
3.1.7 Ensure compliance with surveillances.
3.1.8 Review the Emergency Response documents to ensure compliance with current regulatory requirements and commitments.
3.1.9 Provide Emergency Response Program documents necessary for licensing to the appropriate State, Federal and local agencies in accordance with current regulatory guidance.
3.1.10 Ensure an adequate public information program is established and maintained to inform the public about the Emergency Response Program.
3.1.11 Provide for maintenance of the Prompt Notification System.
3.1.12 Provide for maintenance and testing of the ENRS.
3.2 STPEGS Department Managers shall:
3.2.1 Provide personnel to staff the ERO.
3.2.2 Assist the Emergency Response Division in drill/exercise scenario development as requested.
OPGP05-ZV-0005 Rev. 3 Page 4 of 5 Emergency Response Program 3.3 Manager, Quality or designee shall:
3.3.1 Coordinate review of the Emergency Response Program in accordance with 10CFR50.54(t).
3.3.1.1 Applicable portions of the findings will be made available to the appropriate County, State and federal governments.
3.4 Superintendent, Security or designee shall:
3.4.1 Provide security to the STPEGS in accordance with the Physical Security Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan to control ingress and egress and traffic control during emergency situations or drills/exercises.
3.4.2 Operate the Emergency Notification and Response System (ENRS).
3.4.3 Ensure required emergency preparedness training in accordance with the responsibilities in procedure OPGP03-ZT-0139, Emergency Preparedness Training Program.
3.5 Manager, Training or designee shall:
3.5.1 Ensure required emergency preparedness training in accordance with the responsibilities in procedure OPGP03-ZT-0139, Emergency Preparedness Training Program.
3.6 Manager, Applications & Business Software or designee shall:
3.6.1 Provide for maintenance and testing of the Prompt Notification Siren Subsystem.
3.6.2 Provide for maintenance and testing of communication networks in conjunction with the operation of the Emergency Response Facilities.
3.7 General Manager, Station Support, shall:
3.7.1 Maintain overall authority and responsibility for radiological emergency response planning.
4.0 Procedure 4.1 Program maintenance and implementation shall be in accordance with the descriptions provided in Section 3.0 of this procedure.
IIOPGP05-ZV-0005 Rev. 3 Page 5of 5 I Emergency Response Program I 5.0 References 5.1 STPEGS Emergency Plan 5.2 Operations Quality Assurance Plan (OQAP) 5.3 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.47, Emergency Plans 5.4 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix E, Emergency Planning and Response for Production and Utilization Facilities 5.5 ANSI/ANI 3.7.3, Radiological Emergency Response Exercises for Nuclear Power Plants 5.6 NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP- 1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Response in Support of Nuclear Power Plants 5.7 NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities 5.8 NUREG/CR-325 1, The Role of Security During Safety-Related Emergencies at Nuclear Power Plants 6.0 Support Documents 6.1 None
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION D0527 T1O31534961 0PGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 1 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Quality Non Safety-Related Usage: Available Effective Date: 12/18/02 Max Keyes N/A N/A Emergency Response Division PREPARER TECHNICAL USER COGNIZANT ORGANIZATION Table of Contents Page
1.0 Purpose and Scope
............................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 Procedure ........................................................... 3 4.0 References .......................................................... 6 5.0 Support Documents ............................................................................................................... 6 Form 1, Emergency Plan Revision Checklist .............................................................................. 7 Form 2, Emergency Plan Approval Form ................................................................................. 12 Form 3, Emergency Response Program Evaluation .................................................................. 13
OPGPO5-ZV-0010 ]Rev. 6 Page 2 of 14 I Emergency Plan Revision J
1.0 Purpose and Scope
1.1 This procedure provides guidance for the revision and approval of the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) Emergency Plan and implementing procedures.
1.2 This procedure defines the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.54(q), for submission of revisions of the Emergency Plan to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
I 1.3 This procedure provides for the evaluation of proposed plant changes or procedures that may affect the Emergency Plan or the emergency planning effort at the STPEGS.
1.4 This procedure implements appropriate portions of the STPEGS Emergency Plan.
2.0 Responsibilities 2.1 The General Manager, Station Support, is responsible for 2.1.1 Final approval of Revisions and Interim Change Notices (ICNs) to the Emergency Plan.
2.1.2 Approval of select implementing procedures.
2.2 The Supervisor, Emergency Response, or designee, is responsible for:
2.2.1 Maintaining the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures in accordance with appropriate regulations.
2.2.2 Performing an annual review of the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures, to include:
"* Written critiques and evaluations of drills/exercises;
"* Changes in key personnel that are part of the Emergency Response Organization;
"* Changes in the organizational structure;
"* Changes in applicable Federal and State regulations;
- Changes in functional capability of support organizations;
- Modifications to the Station facilities, procedures, emergency response facilities, site or operating status that could affect emergency response;
- Recommendations received from other organizations, such as Federal, State, or County agencies or private support groups;
- Independent audit findings;
I"" OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 3 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision
- Comments from the State and County;
- Documented Condition Report or NRC Inspection Report identified items; and
- Changes to implementing procedures.
2.2.3 This review shall be performed and documented in accordance with OPGP05-ZV-0014, Emergency Response Activities.
2.3 Appropriate Department Managers, or designees, are responsible for:
2.3.1 Reviewing and commenting on proposed Revisions and ICNs to the Emergency Plan.
2.4 The Plant General Manager is responsible for:
2.4.1 Recommending for approval Revisions and ICNs to the Emergency Plan.
2.4.2 Approving Revisions to select implementing procedures.
3.0 Procedure 3.1 Emergency Plan Revision 3.1.1 Revisions to the Emergency Plan shall be accomplished, as needed, and shall include items identified in Section 2.2.2.
3.1.2 Revisions shall be prepared as follows:
"* Revisions that decrease the effectiveness of the emergency response program shall be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to implementation.
"* Revisions that decrease the effectiveness of the emergency response program shall be discussed and agreed on by the state and county governmental authorities.
"* Every page of the Emergency Plan shall be marked to reflect the proposed revision number.
" The proposed Revision shall be reviewed in accordance with procedure OPAPO1-ZA-0103, License Compliance Review, Form 1. Revisions are exempt from 10CFR50.59 Screening so skip questions 1 through 4 and go to question 5.
" The proposed Revision shall be reviewed for compliance with 10CFR50.54 and NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, standards. This review shall be documented on Form 1, Emergency Plan Revision Checklist.
OPGPO-ZV-0010 I Rev. 6 I Page 4of 14 Emergency Plan Revision
- An independent technical review shall be performed utilizing 0PAP01-ZA 0102, Form 4, Technical Review Checklist.
- Review & Comment Requirements:
- 0- Forward the proposed revision and applicable forms in accordance with procedure OPAP01-ZA-0102, Plant Procedures, to Quality and all departments that could be affected by the revision.
-:o At least one facility manager from each of the emergency response facilities (Emergency Operations Facility, Technical Support Center and Operations Support Center).
o Once the proposed Revision has completed the review and comment cycle, and all comments have been resolved, it shall be forwarded to the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) for recommendation for approval.
- If the proposed Revision is recommended for approval by PORC, it shall be forwarded to the Plant General Manager for approval as documented on Form 2, Emergency Plan Approval Form.
°:o The proposed Revision shall be submitted to the General Manager, Station Support, for final approval, as documented on Form 2.
o Once the revision has received final approval, the revision's effective date shall be typed on the bottom of every page of the Emergency Plan.
+*° Once the effective date has been typed on all pages of the Emergency Plan, it shall be forwarded to Document Control for distribution.
3.2 Interim Change Notice (ICN) 3.2.1 In instances where a revision to a page or several pages of the Emergency Plan is necessary, outside the full revision, an ICN may be processed as follows:
"* ICNs that decrease the effectiveness of the emergency response program shall be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to implementation.
"* ICNs that decrease the effectiveness of the emergency response program shall be discussed and agreed on by the state and county governmental authorities.
"* The affected page(s) shall be marked with the ICN number (e.g., current revision number-dash-sequential ICN number: 18-1, 18-2, etc.)
9 The ICN shall be processed the same as a plan revision.
I OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 5 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision
"* Once the ICN has received final approval, the ICNs effective date shall be typed on the bottom of all affected pages.
"* Once the effective date has been typed on all affected pages, the affected pages shall be forwarded to Document Control for distribution.
3.3 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions:
3.3.1 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures are listed in the Emergency Plan, Attachment 2, Implementing Procedures.
3.3.2 PORC review and Plant General Manager approval is necessary if revising the responsibilities, purpose and scope, safety classification, or other departments are assigned tasks not previously required (Intent Change).
- All other revisions are considered administrative in nature and only require the Supervisor, Emergency Response approval.
3.3.3 Revisions to implementing procedures shall be processed in accordance with OPAP01-ZA-0102, Plant Procedures.
3.3.4 Revisions other than editorial clarifications shall be reviewed in accordance with Form 3, Emergency Response Program Evaluation.
3.3.5 Emergency Action Level changes shall be discussed and agreed on by the state and county governmental authorities (this list may not be all inclusive):
"* State of Texas, Division of Emergency Management,
"* State of Texas, Bureau of Radiation Control,
"* Matagorda County.
3.4 30 Day NRC Transmittal (10CFR50.54(q))
3.4.1 All Emergency Plan Revisions, Implementing Procedure Revisions or Interim Change Notices shall be sent to the NRC Within thirty (30) days after effective date:
a Draft a cover letter including the changed pages/procedure, Summary of Changes and Receipt Acknowledgement Form.
@ Forward the package to the Licensing Department for transmittal to the NRC.
3.4.2 Revisions requiring NRC approval prior to their effective date shall be submitted to the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) and be approved by the Plant General Manager prior to NRC Submittal.
1 I OPGP05-ZV-0010 I Rev. 6 1 Page 6of 1471 I Emergency Plan Revision I
"* Draft a cover letter including the changed pages/procedure, Summary of Changes and Receipt Acknowledgement Form.
"* Forward the package to the Licensing Department for transmittal to the NRC.
3.4.3 Any changes made during the NRC approval process require PORC submittal and approval by the Plant General Manager prior to effective date.
4.0 References 4.1 STPEGS Emergency Plan 4.2 10CFR50, Appendix E 4.3 10CFR50.47 4.4 10CFR50.54(q) 4.5 IOCFR50.4 4.6 NUREG 0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1 4.7 NUMARC/NESP-007, Rev 2 4.8 OPAPO1-ZA-0102, Plant Procedures 4.9 OPGP05-ZV-0014, Emergency Response Activities 5.0 Support Documents 5.1 Form 1, Emergency Plan Revision Checklist 5.2 Form 2, Emergency Plan Approval Form 5.3 Form 3, Emergency Response Program Evaluation
SIOPGP05-ZV-0010 I Rev. 6 Page 7 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Emergency Plan Revision Checklist Page 1 of 5 I Form 1 Proposed revisions to the STPEGS Emergency Plan shall be checked against each of the following checklist items. The Reviewer shall answer each checklist item by initialing in the space provided. Any item answered YES shall be described in full detail. Provide supplemental sheets, as required.
10CFR50.54(q) states, in part:
The nuclear power reactor licensee may make changes to these plans without Commission approval only if the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the plans and the plans, as changed, continue to meet the standards of 10CFR50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E of this part. NUREG 0654/FEMA REP-1, Rev. 1 provides specific guidance in regard to the requirement of these standards.
a) Does the revision affect this standard?
b) Does the revision decrease the effectiveness of the STPEGS Emergency Plan?
c) Bases for answer to a) and/or b).
Standards
- 1. Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the licensee and State and County organizations within the Emergency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various supporting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a continuous basis a) YES__ NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 2. Onshift licensee responsibilities for emergency response are defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timely augmentation of response capabilities is available and the interfaces among various onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities are specified.
a) YES NO_ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
I OPGP05-ZV-0010 I Rev. 6 Page 8 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Form 1 Emergency Plan Revision Checklist Page 2 of 5
- 3. Arrangements for requesting and effectively using assistance resources have been made, arrangements to accommodate State and County staff at the licensee's Emergency Operation Facility have been made, and other organizations capable of augmenting the planned response have been identified.
a) YES NO __ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 4. An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme, the basis of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the licensee, and State and County emergency management plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures.
a) YES NO __ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO__ N/A c) BASES:
- 5. Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and County response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) have been established.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 6. Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
I OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 9 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision E Form 1 Emergency Plan Revision Checklist Page 3 of 5
- 7. Information is made available to the public on a periodic basis on how they will be notified and what their initial actions should be in an emergency (e.g., listening to a local broadcast station), the principal points of contact with the news media for dissemination of information during an emergency (including the physical location or locations) are established in advance, and procedures for coordinated dissemination of information to the public are established.
a) YES_ NO__ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 8. Adequate emergency response facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are provided and maintained.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 9. Adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are in use.
a) YES_ NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 10. A range of protective actions have been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
I OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 10 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision P
E Form 1 Emergency Plan Revision Checklist 7 Page4 of 5
- 11. Means for controlling radiological emergency exposures, are established for emergency workers.
The means for controlling radiological exposures shall include exposure guidelines consistent with EPA Emergency Worker and Lifesaving Activity Protective Action Guidelines.
a) YES NO__ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 12. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals.
a) YES NO__ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO__ N/A c) BASES:
- 13. General plans for recovery and reentry are developed.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 14. Periodic exercises are conducted to evaluate major portions of emergency response capabilities, periodic drills are conducted to develop and maintain key skills, and deficiencies identified as a result of exercises or drills are corrected.
a) YES_ NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
OP-GPO5-ZV-OO01O Rev. 6 Page -11 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Form 1 Emergency Plan Revision Checklist Page 5ofg
- 15. Radiological emergency response training is provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency.
a) YES NO (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO N/A c) BASES:
- 16. Responsibilities for emergency plan development, review, and distribution are established, and planners are properly trained.
a) YES NO_ (If NO, skip b and c) b) YES NO_ N/A c) BASES:
REVIEW FINDINGS:
REVIEWER: DATE:
REVIEW APPROVAL: DATE:
Supervisor, Emergency Response This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 12 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Form 2 Emergency Plan Approval Form Page 1 of I U Revision Is attached for your review and approval of the STPEGS U] Interim Change Notice Emergency Plan.
PORC Meeting No. /
Date Approved:
Plant General Manager Date Approved:
General Manager, Station Support Date I Effective Date:
When completed, this form shall serve as certification and accompany the STPEGS Emergency Plan change package.
When completed, a copy of this form shall become the cover page of the revision for controlled distribution This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 13 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision__
I Form 3 Emergency Response Program Evaluation Page I of 2 Document: Rev.:
This Form shall be used to determine if a proposed change to an Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure decreases the effectiveness of the STPEGS Emergency Response Program.
- 1. Does the proposed change differ from the requirements of NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1, Rev. 1 or prior NRC Emergency Response Program Commitments in any of the following areas:
- a. Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) Q Yes [U No
- b. Onsite Emergency Organization U Yes U No
- c. Emergency Response Support and Resources [3 Yes U No
- d. Emergency Classification System U Yes U No
- e. Notification Methods and Procedures U Yes U No
- f. Emergency Communications U Yes U No
- g. Public Education and Information U Yes U No
- h. Emergency Facilities and Equipment U Yes U No
- i. Accident Assessment U Yes U No
- j. Protective Response -Yes 1 No
- k. Radiological Exposure Control U Yes Ui No I. Medical and Public Health Support U Yes -' No
- m. Recovery and Reentry Planning and Post-Accident Operations 13 Yes Q No
- n. Exercises and Drills U Yes U No
- o. Radiological Emergency Response Training U Yes U No
- p. Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, U Yes U No Periodic, Review and Distribution of Emergency Plans
- 2. If YES was answered for any of the previous questions, then provide justification that the document would not decrease the effectiveness of the Emergency Response Program per 10CFR50.54(q):
This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
OPGP05-ZV-0010 Rev. 6 Page 14 of 14 Emergency Plan Revision Page 2 of 2 I Form 3 Emergency Response Program Evaluation
- 3. Does the document involve changes to:
3.1 Emergency Action Levels (EAL) EBYes, UNo 3.1.1 If yes, does the proposed EAL changes differ from the requirements of NUMARC/NESP-007, Rev 2 OYes U No
- 4. Evaluation Comments:
- 5. Evaluated by: Date: I I
- 6. L] Approved El E-Plan Revision Required Before Implementation El Disapproved/Reason:
/ /
Supervisor, Emergency Response Date This page when completed, shall be retained as per the Document Type List (DTL).
. . . . . .......-. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ra =e 1 Emih, tan-ia - flIwitinn nf inntm IrA Aiithnritv rage ]*
It- = z L. ý . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .~
From: Emily Garcia To: Out of Office Memos Date: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:36AM
Subject:
Delegation of Signature Authority January 6, 2003 NOCNOC03007724 STI 31540592 H05 Paul Serra will be offsite on January 6-9. In his absence, Alan Mikus will assume the duties of the Plant Protection Manager, including signature authority.
This e-mail should be attached to any documents signed by Alan Mikus during this time.
CC: Broadwater, Terry; Hall, Maudester; Maler, Richard; Maxey, Shanda; Mikus, Alan; Mills, Lois; Morgan, Aubrey; Serra, Paul