NL-12-2268, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1, SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11
ML12355A051
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Stewart W
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2268 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A051 (52)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E1 1-CO01A Equip. Class" 6 Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1A Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area Pump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NUI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or 'loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion was observed but was judged not to be a seismic: concern.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question:

only applies if the item is one of the 50% for Which an anchorage configuration, verification is required.)

The anchorage was compared against the SQUG package dated 10/28/88.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0. NEI UL, N/AL]YER NEI U[i N/AL!YED NEI U-] N/AU YI NCi U0- N/AU YE NEI UI-IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 93 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NO] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiDoNo.

EI1-COO A Equip. Class Equipment Descriptioný RHRSW PUMP 1A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment 0r structures?

YZ NEI UE] N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NE:] U0 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the: equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NE] UEr N/AEl YN NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions S1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments.(Additional pages may beaddedas necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 1P41-COO lB.Evaluated by: WESLEY WILLIAMS Date: 9/2512012 9/25/2012 KURSAT KINALI Page 94 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E1 1-CO01A -Equip. Class' 6 Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1A NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI] U[-]Photographs l Page 95 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4'p t I-k* , f.4 Page 96 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YZ N-] UI'J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1EI I-CO1D Equip. Class' 6 Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1D Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area POmp Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the, results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N0 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion was seen on the baseplate.

Overhead channel is also starting to corrode.A general corrosion CR has been initiated (CR516327).

YZ NE] UE] N/AE]YN NE] UE1 N/AE]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks. in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE]: UE] N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is: one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE] UE] N/AN YN NEI UE]IEnter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 97 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE N-] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment'ID No. 1EI-COQID Equip. Class'Equipment Description RHFRSW PUMP ID Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets, free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YI NEI UEI N/All 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI' N/A~l and masonry block walls not likely to. collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate fleXibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction, evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NI] UI0 N/AD]YI NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you .looked for and found no other seismic conditionszthat could YZ NI] UI-adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk by was performed within the package for 1P41-COO.

'B.Evaluated by KURSAT KINAL/WESLEY WILLIAMS Date: 9/12/2012 9/12/2012 V 7 Page 98 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y0 Nn U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1EI1-COOID Equip. Classi 6 Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1D Photographs Page 99 of 436

.ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 100 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 Of 3 Status: YCK, NR U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-COO1A Equip.Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1A Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area Pump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may'be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the resultsofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y0 NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion was observed but judged not to be a seismic concern.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification, is required.)

The anchorage was compared against the SQUG package dated 10/28/88.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NEI U[- N/AE]YN NEI U-] N/All]YZ N[] UE] N/Al]YZ NEI U-I N/All YZ NI U0II' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 101 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE] Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No; 1P41-COO1A Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NEI UE3 N/A[L1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,, ceiling tiles and.lighting, YZ N[] U[I N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based: on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO] UE1 N/A[]YN NO.UE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE ,adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 1P41-COO1B.

Evaluated by: WESLEY WILLIAMS / /'/6. ..-, -Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 102 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IP41-COOIA Equip., Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1A NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ N[E] U[]Photographs Page 103 of 436

.: ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y .NE] UE]Seismic: Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-COQ1B Equip. Class: Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1B Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El' Room, Area PUmD Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO*of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage.

free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y0 NE] UE] N/AE]Y0 NEI ULI N/AE-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage, evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI U-' N/AZNEI UE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix1 B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 104 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status; YZ Ni-] UM]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment'ID.No.

IP41-COOIB Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Description PSW PUMP IS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NEil U-] N/AL]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, :ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1Z NEI U'. N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to. collapse onto:the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on. the above seismic interaction, evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI U!-] N/A[]YO NEl UE-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y23 NEI U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.Evaluated by: WESLEY WILLIAMS KURSATKINALI

_ .4 L Date: 9/12/2012 9/12/2012 Page 105 of 436

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKODOWN CHECKLISTS

~ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-COOIB

-Equip. Class, Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1B NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NEI Ur-Photographs Page 106 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ Nn] UV-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F042A Equip. Class, Equipment Description CRD RM CLR IA AOV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 118 Room, Area NW Diagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc.. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document'the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

INLINE ITEM 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NZ YEI NEI UM N/A2 YEI NEI UE' N/AI YEI NEI UEi N/AZ YEI- NEI U- N/AZ YZ NEI UE-,Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

Page 107 of 436 i% ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F042A Equip. Classi 7 Equipment Description CRD RM CLR IA AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NO] UM N/AEII 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEIl UI- N/AF and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UL] N/Al]YO NEI Ur]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions.that could YZ NEI Ul]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment is in the same, area with Item 1 T41-BOOIA.

Area walk by was performed within that package:.Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali 1 /4&1t ý 44 Date: 9/7/2012 917/2012 Mike Steele Page 108 of 436

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F042A

-Equip. Class, Equipment Description CR0 RM CLR 1A AOV NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE U-]Photographs Page 109 of 436

., ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 110 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YN N[-] U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-FO39A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description RHR/CS RM CLR. 2A AOV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 114 Room, Area SE Diagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checldist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the ,SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the resUlts ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is providedat the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification, required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

INLINE ITEM.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the, anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NO YEI NEI UE- N/A YEI NEI UE- N/AR YEI NEI UE- N/A YEI NEI UE- N/AZ YO NO UE-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 111 of 436

.ATTACHMENT 3
SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3.Status: YO N[I UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-FO39A Equip. Class,: 7 Equipment Description RHR/CS RM CLR 2A AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby .equipment or structures?

YIR NEl UI- N/AU3 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NO UEl N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NUI UU N/AU 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 NEI- UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The area walk by for this equipment was performed for item 1 T41-BOO2A.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kina/i CUMUMM.Y-)Mike Steele Date: 9/1/2012 9/7/2012 Page 112 of 436

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment MI No. 1P41-F039A

-Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHR/CS RM CLR 2A AOV NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NE] Ur-Photographs Page 113 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NM] UM[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-FO35B Equip. Class Equipment Description HPCI RM CLR 50 AOV Location:'

Bldg. REACTOR FloorEl. 105 Room, Area HPCI Room'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the. Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the: SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This equipment is in-line.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NO YE NE U0 N/AO YE' NE UE' N/AZ YE NEI UE N/AO YE NEI UE[ N/A0 YO NEI UE]' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 114 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0.Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U[]-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-FO35B Equip. Class2 7 Equipment Description HPCI RM CLR 5B AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NEI UE[ N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO U"I N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?YZ NO ULI N/A--YZ NEl Ur1 Other Adverse Conditions 1.11. Have you looked for and: found no other seismic conditions that could Y2 NEI, Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Conduit support is located above and close to the handwheel.

The conduit support.is in close proximity.

However both items are rigid in the vertical direction, therefore this is not a seismic concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Walk-by was completed with component package 1E4 1-C001.Evaluated by: Wesley Williams 4 e4IZ A Date: 9/10/12 9/10/12 Kursat Kinali Page 115 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-FO35B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description HPCI RM CLR 5B AOV NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]Photographs Page 116 of 436

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Picture showing the handwheel being very close to unistrut support.Page 117 of 436

'ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1T41-FO40A Equip. Classi Equipment Description REF FL TO SBGT ISO DMPR NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet. 1 of 4 Status: YZ NEI U[-Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area Standby Gas Treatment Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional butrecommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist:

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist.for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline item.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NO YEI NEI UI- N/AZ YEI NEI UE] N/AS 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UIE N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE N[-1 UE- N/AO YM NO UE'I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 118 of 436

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1T41-FO40A Equip. Class, Equipment Description REF FL TO SBGT ISO DMPR NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YI NR UM-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets: free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YED NEI UrI N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Ut, N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE1 N/A[]YNNEI UE3 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The damper is located above the storage area where loose equipment are present. However, these items can not affect the damper Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Mike Steele Date: 9/7/2012 917/2012 Page 119 of 436

' ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKODOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1T41-FO4OA Equip. Class'Equipment Description REF FL TO SBGT ISO DMPR NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y r NM uI]Photographs Page 120 of 436 YATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 121 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-FO04 Equip. Classi 8 Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM CST Location-Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 93 Room, Area HPCi Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be. used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration, verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?:

This equipment is in-line.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible, cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one~of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NO YEI NEI UE- N/AO YEI NEI UE- N/AO YEI NEI UE1 N/AO Y[-E NEI UiE N/A0 Y[ NEI UE1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 122 of 436

.ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YM NEI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-F004 Equip. Class, Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM C~ST Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NOL UEI N/Arl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N[i] UL] N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate.

flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UL N/ALU-OtherAdverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NI- U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may beadded as necessary)

Walk-by was completed with component package 1E4 1-C001 Evaluated by: Wesley Willams Kursat-Kinali f ,:.... Y, Date: 9/10/12 9/10/12 Page 123 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN N[n] uFE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-F004 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM CST Photographs Page 124 of 436 o ,.. ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YM N[] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-FOO Equip. Class, Equipment Description HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPL YVLV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR, Floor El. 96 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, EtC. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such, verification)?

This equipment is in-line.2. IS the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NO YEI NI] UI] N/AO YIO NI] Ui] N/Ag YI-] NI] UI- N/AN YrI NIO UI- N/AI YZ NI ULi I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 125 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN Nn UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-FOOI Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description.

HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI U01 N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NE] UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely-to collapseonto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U0 N/AEl YN NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Walk-by was completed with component package 1E4 1-COO1.Evaluated by: Wesley Williams (44// Y-J.Date: 9/10112 9/10/12 Kursat Kinali Page 126 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-FOOl Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VLV NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y0 NE] U[-Photographs Page 127 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01', "VERSION 1.0-Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ 1N] U13 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F380A Equip. ClassI 8 Equipment Description PSW RX BLDG ISO VL V Location:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 117 Room, Area Unitvl Division 1 Yard pit Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing

'Checpist This checklist may be used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an-item of equipmenton the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to recoid theresults of jUdgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documeting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is theanc.horage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline item 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration Verification isrequired.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially advee seismic conditions?

Y10 NO,-YO NO, UO N/AO YI- NO U13 N/AO YEI NO U130 N/AZ YO) NEI, 130 WARýYONEI U13 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 128 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01 VERSION. 1.0 Sheet 2of 4 Status: N UI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist(SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1P41-F380A Equip. Class! 8 Equipment, Description PSW RX BLDG ISOL VLV Inýteracton)Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO UD N/ADE 8.. Are overhead equipment, dis#ributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YC :N[ UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equpment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiay adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U N/AD Y**Iur Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no othler seismic conditio.nsthat could YO NOI U1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Surface corrosion on the pipe flange was observed.

However, this was judged not to be a potentially adverse seismic condition by the SWEs.Evaluated by- j Date: 9/27/20121 9/27/2012 Page 129 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NO u0'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F380A -Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description PSW RM BLDG ISOL VLV Photographs Page 130 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 131 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YI N[] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1R43-FO15A Equip.Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLE-NOID VLV Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area GENERATOR ROOM 1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc.. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verificationrequired (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Component is an in-line mounted valve and does not contain anchorage.

See pictures 1 and 2.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if theditem is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Basedon the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE N/A9 YE NE UE N/A19 YEI NE UE- N/A YE NEI UE- N/AN YZ Nn UE-I.Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 132 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y N[- UR-Equipment ID No. 1R43-F015A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLENOID VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YIE NEI Ur N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U' N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free.of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U' N/AE YE NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked forand found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.Evaluated by: Juan Wwava Patrick Kelly Date: 09/06/2012 0910612012 Page 133 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1R43-FO15A Equip. Classi 8 Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLENOID VL V NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ Nr-] Ur]Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (1 R43-FO1 5A)Page 134 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 2: Equipment Elevation (1R43-FO15A)

Page 135 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YN NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F422B Equip. Class' 8'Equipment Description Z41-BOOBC Isolation Globe MOV Location:

Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 180 Room, Area Control Room Roof Behind Compressors Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of-the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[-] NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment is line-mounted equipment, so it does not have anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE NWA YO NE U- N/A0 YE- NEI UE N/A[K YO NE UE N/AN YX NO UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 136 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E P41-F422B Equip. Class, Equipment Description Z41,-BOOBC Isolation Globe MQ'L Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?:
9. Do attached lines have'adequateflexibilityto avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI U-I N/AL Y0 NDI U-- N/AD YJZ NDI UI" N/ADI Y0 NEI U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDI UD--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Hoton Date: 09/10/2012 09110/2012 Page 137 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1P41-F4228 Equip. Class'Equipment Description Z41-BOO8C Isolation Globe MOV NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]Phot(Figure I -Equipment ID No (1P41-F422B)

Page 138 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Figure 2- Equipment Elevation (1 P41 -F422B)Page 139 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NE-] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E41-F111 Equip. Class, Equipment Description Vacuum Valve Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 119 Room, Area Torus Room Bay 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at.the end of this. checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEO N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?'

The component is an inline component, so there is no anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visiblecracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations,, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse: seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UE- N/A[9 YE NE UE] NWA Y[E] NE UU N/AZ YEI NE UE] N/A0z YZ NO UtE 1 Enter the equipment class name fromAppendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 140 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDo No. .E4c1-Flll Equip.Cas Equipment Description Vacuum Valve Interaction E~ffects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is a sway strut attached to the pipe feeding in to the vacuum valve that is approximately 1 "from the valve. The valve is located near a bend in the pipe supported by the same sway strut, so there will be very little relative:

movement between the component and the sway strut. Therefore, it is judged that there is no potentially adverse seismic condition 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-1 N/AD]YN NEI Ul] N/AE]YN NEI Ul- N/AE3 YN NEI UE" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic, conditions that could YN NEI U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/17/2012 09/17/2012 Page 141 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E4 1-FLI Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Vacuum Valve Photographs Figure 1 -Equipment ID No (1E41-FI 11)Page 142 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (1E41-FI 11)Page 143 of 436 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 -Sway Strut to Component Spacing (1E41-F1 11)Page 144 of 436

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2268,_Edwin_I._Hatch,_Unit_1,_SNCH082-RPT-01,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_3_of_11&oldid=908738"