ML21202A078

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Issuance of Amendment Nos. 338 and 320 Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections
ML21202A078
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/2021
From: James Kim
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Carr E
Public Service Enterprise Group
Kim J
References
EPID L-2021-LLA-0077
Download: ML21202A078 (30)


Text

September 3, 2021 Mr. Eric Carr President and Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear LLC - N09 P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038

SUBJECT:

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT NOS. 338 AND 320 RE: REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TO ADOPT TSTF-577, REVISED FREQUENCIES FOR STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2021-LLA-0077)

Dear Mr. Carr:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment Nos. 338 and 320 to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, in response to your application dated April 28, 2021.

These amendments adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections, which is an approved change to the Standard Technical Specifications, into the Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, technical specifications.

A copy of the related safety evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions monthly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

James S. Kim, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 338 to DPR-70
2. Amendment No. 320 to DPR-75
3. Safety Evaluation
4. Notices and Environmental Findings cc: Listserv

PSEG NUCLEAR LLC EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-272 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 338 Renewed License No. DPR-70

1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment filed by PSEG Nuclear LLC, acting on behalf of itself and Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensees), dated April 28, 2021, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance: (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

Enclosure 1

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-70 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 338, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. PSEG Nuclear LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications, and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Digitally signed by James James G. G. Danna Date: 2021.09.03 Danna 13:52:01 -04'00' James G. Danna, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 3, 2021

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 338 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 Replace the following page of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-70 with the attached revised page. The revised page is identified by amendment number and contains a marginal line indicating the area of change.

Remove Insert 3 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A, Technical Specifications, with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

Remove Insert 6-19b 6-19b 6-19c 6-19c 6-19d 6-19d 6-19e 6-19e 6-24a 6-24a 6-24b 6-24b

instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5) PSEG Nuclear LLC, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (6) PSEG Nuclear LLC, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.

C. This renewed license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Section 40.41 of Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level PSEG Nuclear LLC is authorized to operate the facility at a steady state reactor core power level not in excess of 3459 megawatts (one hundred percent of rated core power).

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 338, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. PSEG Nuclear LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

(3) Deleted Per Amendment 22, 11-20-79 (4) Less than Four Loop Operation PSEG Nuclear LLC shall not operate the reactor at power levels above P-7 (as defined in Table 3.3-1 of Specification 3.3.1.1 of Appendix A to this renewed license) with less than four (4) reactor coolant loops in operation until safety analyses for less than four loop operation have been submitted by the licensees and approval for less than four loop operation at power levels above P-7 has been granted by the Commission by Amendment of this renewed license.

(5) PSEG Nuclear LLC shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the approved fire protection program as described in the Updated Final Safety Renewed License No. DPR-70 Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

7) Limitations on the dose rate resulting from radioactive material released in gaseous effluents to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to the doses associated with 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1,
8) Limitations on the annual and quarterly air doses resulting from noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each unit to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50,
9) Limitations on the annual and quarterly doses to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from Iodine-131, Iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released from each unit to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50,
10) Limitations on the annual dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources conforming to 40 CFR Part 190.

6.8.4.h Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program A program shall be provided to monitor the radiation and radionuclides in the environs of the plant. The program shall provide (1) representative measurements of radioactivity in the highest potential exposure pathways, and (2) verification of the accuracy of the effluent monitoring program and modeling of environmental exposure pathways. The program shall (1) be contained in the ODCM, (2) conform to the guidance of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, and (3) include the following:

1) Monitoring, sampling, analysis, and reporting of radiation and radionuclides in the environment in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM,
2) A Land Use Census to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by the results of the census, and
3) Participation in a Interlaboratory Comparison Program to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring.

6.8.4.i Steam Generator (SG) Program An SG Program shall be established and implemented to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained. In addition, the SG Program shall include the following:

a. Provisions for condition monitoring assessments. Condition monitoring assessment means an evaluation of the as found condition of the tubing with respect to the performance criteria for structural integrity and accident induced leakage. The as found condition refers to the condition of the tubing during an SG inspection outage, as determined from the inservice inspection results or by other means, prior to the plugging of tubes. Condition monitoring assessments shall be conducted during each SALEM - UNIT 1 6-19b Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS outage during which the SG tubes are inspected or plugged to confirm that the performance criteria are being met.

b. Performance criteria for SG tube integrity. SG tube integrity shall be maintained by meeting the performance criteria for tube structural integrity, accident induced leakage, and operational leakage.
1. Structural integrity performance criterion: All in-service SG tubes shall retain structural integrity over the full range of normal operating conditions (including startup, operation in the power range, hot standby, and cool down), all anticipated transients included in the design specification, and design basis accidents. This includes retaining a safety factor of 3.0 against burst under normal steady state full power operation primary-to-secondary pressure differential and a safety factor of 1.4 against burst applied to the design basis accident primary-to-secondary pressure differentials. Apart from the above requirements, additional loading conditions associated with the design basis accidents, or combination of accidents in accordance with the design and licensing basis, shall also be evaluated to determine if the associated loads contribute significantly to burst or collapse. In the assessment of tube integrity, those loads that do significantly affect burst or collapse shall be determined and assessed in combination with the loads due to pressure with a safety factor of 1.2 on the combined primary loads and 1.0 on axial secondary loads.
2. Accident induced leakage performance criterion: The primary-to-secondary accident induced leakage rate for any design basis accident, other than a SG tube rupture, shall not exceed the leakage rate assumed in the accident analysis in terms of total leakage rate for all SGs and leakage rate for an individual SG.

Leakage is not to exceed 1 gallon per minute per SG.

3. The operational leakage performance criterion is specified in LCO 3.4.6.2, Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage.
c. Provisions for SG tube plugging criteria. Tubes found by inservice inspection to contain flaws with a depth equal to or exceeding 40% of the nominal tube wall thickness shall be plugged.

The following alternate plugging criteria shall be applied as an alternative to the 40%

depth based criteria:

1. Tubes with service-induced flaws located greater than 15.21 inches below the top of the tubesheet do not require plugging. Tubes with service-induced flaws located in the portion of the tube from the top of the tubesheet to 15.21 inches below the top of the tubesheet shall be plugged upon detection.
d. Provisions for SG tube inspections. Periodic SG tube inspections shall be performed.

The number and portions of the tubes inspected and methods of inspection shall be performed with the objective of detecting flaws of any type (e.g., volumetric flaws, axial and circumferential cracks) that may be present along the length of the tube, from the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube inlet to the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube outlet except for any portions of the tube that are exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria, and that may satisfy the applicable tube plugging criteria.

SALEM - UNIT 1 6-19c Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS The portion of the tube below 15.21 inches from the top of the tubesheet is excluded from this requirement.

The tube-to-tubesheet weld is not part of the tube. In addition to meeting the requirements of d.1, d.2, and d.3 below, the inspection scope, inspection methods, and inspection intervals shall be such as to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained until the next SG inspection. A degradation assessment shall be performed to determine the type and location of flaws to which the tubes may be susceptible and, based on this assessment, to determine which inspection methods need to be employed and at what locations.

1. Inspect 100% of the tubes in each SG during the first refueling outage following SG installation.
2. After the first refueling outage following SG installation, inspect 100% of the tubes in each SG at least every 54 effective full power months, which defines the inspection period. If none of the SG tubes have ever experienced cracking other than in regions that are exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria and the SG inspection was performed with enhanced probes, the inspection period may be extended to 72 effective full power months. Enhanced probes have a capability to detect flaws of any type equivalent to or better than array probe technology. The enhanced probes shall be used from the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube inlet to the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube outlet except any portions of the tube that are exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria. If there are regions where enhanced probes cannot be used, the tube inspection techniques shall be capable of detecting all forms of existing and potential degradation in that region.

SALEM - UNIT 1 6-19d Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

3. If crack indications are found in portions of the SG tube excluding any region that is exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria, then the next inspection for each affected and potentially affected SG for the degradation mechanism that caused the crack indication shall be at the next refueling outage, but may be deferred to the following refueling outage if 100% inspection of all SGs was performed with enhanced probes as described in paragraph d.2. If definitive information, such as from examination of a pulled tube, diagnostic non-destructive testing, or engineering evaluation indicates that a crack-like indication is not associated with a crack(s), then the indication need not be treated as a crack.
e. Provisions for monitoring operational primary-to-secondary leakage.

6.8.4.j Deleted 6.8.4.k Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Inspection Program In addition to the requirements of the ISI Program, each Reactor Coolant Pump flywheel shall be inspected per the recommendations of Regulatory Position C.4.b of Regulatory Guide 1.14, Revision 1, August 1975. In lieu of Position C.4.b(1) and C.4.b(2), a qualified in-place UT examination over the volume from the inner bore of the flywheel to the circle one-half of the outer radius or a surface examination (MT and/or PT) of exposed surfaces of the removed flywheels may be conducted at 20 year intervals.

SALEM - UNIT 1 6-19e Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

2. WCAP-8385, Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures -

Topical Report, (W Proprietary) Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference.

3. WCAP-10054-P-A, Westinghouse Small Break ECCS Evaluation Model Using NOTRUMP Code (W Proprietary), Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor.
4. WCAP-10266-P-A, The 1981 Version of Westinghouse Evaluation Model Using BASH Code, (W Proprietary) Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor.
5. WCAP-12472-P-A, BEACON - Core Monitoring and Operations Support System, (W Proprietary).
6. CENPD-397-P-A, Improved Flow Measurement Accuracy Using Crossflow Ultrasonic Flow Measurement Technology.
c. The core operating limits shall be determined such that all applicable limits (e.g.,

fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) limits, nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits) of the safety analysis are met.

d. The COLR, including any mid-cycle revisions or supplements, shall be provided upon issuance for each reload cycle to the NRC.

6.9.1.10 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTION REPORT A report shall be submitted within 180 days after the initial entry into HOT SHUTDOWN following completion of an inspection performed in accordance with the Specification 6.8.4.i, Steam Generator (SG) Program. The report shall include:

a. The scope of inspections performed on each SG,
b. Then nondestructive examination techniques utilized for tubes with increased degradation susceptibility;
c. For each degradation mechanism found:
1. The nondestructive examination techniques utilized;
2. The location, orientation (if linear), measured size (if available), and voltage response for each indication. For tube wear at support structures less than 20 percent through-wall, only the total number of indications needs to be reported;
3. A description of the condition monitoring assessment and results, including the margin to the tube integrity performance criteria and comparison with the margin predicted to exist at the inspection by the previous forward-looking tube integrity assessment;
4. The number of tubes plugged during the inspection outage; and SALEM - UNIT 1 6-24a Amendment No. 338

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

d. An analysis summary of the tube integrity conditions predicted to exist at the next scheduled inspection (the forward-looking tube integrity assessment) relative to the applicable performance criteria, including the analysis methodology, inputs, and results.
e. The number and percentage of tubes plugged to date, and the effective plugging percentage in each SG,
f. The results of any SG secondary side inspections;
g. The primary to secondary leakage rate observed in each SG (if it is not practical to assign the leakage to an individual SG, the entire primary to secondary leakage should be conservatively assumed to be from one SG) during the cycle preceding the inspection which is the subject of the report,
h. The calculated accident induced leakage rate from the portion of the tubes below 15.21 inches from the top of the tubesheet for the most limiting accident in the most limiting SG. In addition, if the calculated accident induced leakage rate from the most limiting accident is less than 2.16 times the maximum operational primary to secondary leakage rate, the report should describe how it was determined,
i. The results of monitoring for tube axial displacement (slippage). If slippage is discovered, the implications of the discovery and corrective action shall be provided.

SPECIAL REPORTS 6.9.2 Special reports shall be submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Administrator, USNRC Region I within the time period specified for each report.

6.9.3 DELETED 6.9.4 When a report is required by ACTION 1, 4, 8 or 9 of Table 3.3-11 "Accident Monitoring Instrumentation", a report shall be submitted within the following 14 days. The report shall outline the preplanned alternate method of monitoring for inadequate core cooling, the cause of the inoperability, and the plans and schedule for restoring the instrument channels to OPERABLE status.

SALEM - UNIT 1 6-24b Amendment No. 338

PSEG NUCLEAR LLC EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NO. 50-311 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 320 Renewed License No. DPR-75

1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment filed by PSEG Nuclear LLC, acting on behalf of itself and Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensees), dated April 28, 2021, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance: (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

Enclosure 2

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-75 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 320, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. PSEG Nuclear LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Digitally signed by James James G. G. Danna Date: 2021.09.03 Danna 13:52:42 -04'00' James G. Danna, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 3, 2021

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 320 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 2 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-75 DOCKET NO. 50-311 Replace the following page of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-75 with the attached revised page. The revised page is identified by amendment number and contains a marginal line indicating the area of change.

Remove Insert 3 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A, Technical Specifications, with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

Remove Insert 6-19b 6-19b 6-19c 6-19c 6-19d 6-19d 6-19e 6-19e 6-24a 6-24a 6-24b 6-24b

(4) PSEG Nuclear LLC, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess and use at any time any byproduct, source or special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5) PSEG Nuclear LLC, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (6) PSEG Nuclear LLC, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to possess but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.

C. This renewed license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level PSEG Nuclear LLC is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 3459 megawatts (thermal).

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 320, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. PSEG Nuclear LLC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

Renewed License No. DPR-75 Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

7) Limitations on the dose rate resulting from radioactive material released in gaseous effluents to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to the doses associated with 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1,
8) Limitations on the annual and quarterly air doses resulting from noble gases released in gaseous effluents from each unit to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50,
9) Limitations on the annual and quarterly doses to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from Iodine-131, Iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released from each unit to areas beyond the SITE BOUNDARY conforming to Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50,
10) Limitations on the annual dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources conforming to 40 CFR Part 190.

6.8.4.h Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program A program shall be provided to monitor the radiation and radionuclides in the environs of the plant. The program shall provide (1) representative measurements of radioactivity in the highest potential exposure pathways, and (2) verification of the accuracy of the effluent monitoring program and modeling of environmental exposure pathways. The program shall (1) be contained in the ODCM, (2) conform to the guidance of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, and (3) include the following:

1) Monitoring, sampling, analysis, and reporting of radiation and radionuclides in the environment in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM,
2) A Land Use Census to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by the results of the census, and
3) Participation in a Interlaboratory Comparison Program to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring.

6.8.4.i Steam Generator (SG) Program An SG Program shall be established and implemented to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained. In addition, the SG Program shall include the following:

SALEM - UNIT 2 6-19b Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

a. Provisions for condition monitoring assessments. Condition monitoring assessment means an evaluation of the as found condition of the tubing with respect to the performance criteria for structural integrity and accident induced leakage. The as found condition refers to the condition of the tubing during an SG inspection outage, as determined from the inservice inspection results or by other means, prior to the plugging of tubes. Condition monitoring assessments shall be conducted during each outage during which the SG tubes are inspected or plugged to confirm that the performance criteria are being met.
b. Performance criteria for SG tube integrity. SG tube integrity shall be maintained by meeting the performance criteria for tube structural integrity, accident induced leakage, and operational leakage.
1. Structural integrity performance criterion: All in-service SG tubes shall retain structural integrity over the full range of normal operating conditions (including startup, operation in the power range, hot standby, and cool down), all anticipated transients included in the design specification, and design basis accidents.

This includes retaining a safety factor of 3.0 against burst under normal steady state full power operation primary-to-secondary pressure differential and a safety factor of 1.4 against burst applied to the design basis accident primary-to-secondary pressure differentials. Apart from the above requirements, additional loading conditions associated with the design basis accidents, or combination of accidents in accordance with the design and licensing basis, shall also be evaluated to determine if the associated loads contribute significantly to burst or collapse.

In the assessment of tube integrity, those loads that do significantly affect burst or collapse shall be determined and assessed in combination with the loads due to pressure with a safety factor of 1.2 on the combined primary loads and 1.0 on axial secondary loads.

2. Accident induced leakage performance criterion: The primary-to-secondary accident induced leakage rate for any design basis accident, other than a SG tube rupture, shall not exceed the leakage rate assumed in the accident analysis in terms of total leakage rate for all SGs and leakage rate for an individual SG.

Leakage is not to exceed 1 gallon per minute per SG.

3. The operational leakage performance criterion is specified in LCO 3.4.7.2, Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage.
c. Provisions for SG tube plugging criteria. Tubes found by inservice inspection to contain flaws with a depth equal to or exceeding 40% of the nominal tube wall thickness shall be plugged.

SALEM - UNIT 2 6-19c Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

d. Provisions for SG tube inspections. Periodic SG tube inspections shall be performed. The number and portions of the tubes inspected and methods of inspection shall be performed with the objective of detecting flaws of any type (e.g., volumetric flaws, axial and circumferential cracks) that may be present along the length of the tube, from the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube inlet to the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the tube outlet, and that may satisfy the applicable tube plugging criteria. The tube-to-tubesheet weld is not part of the tube. In addition to meeting the requirements of d.1, d.2, and d.3, below, the inspection scope, inspection methods, and inspection intervals shall be such as to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained until the next SG inspection. A degradation assessment shall be performed to determine the type and location of flaws to which the tubes may be susceptible and, based on this assessment, to determine which inspection methods need to be employed and at what locations.
1. Inspect 100% of the tubes in each SG during the first refueling outage following SG installation.

2 After the first refueling outage following SG installation, inspect 100% of the tubes in each SG at least every 96 effective full power months, which defines the inspection period.

SALEM - UNIT 2 6-19d Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

3. If crack indications are found in any SG tube, then the next inspection for each affected and potentially affected SG for the degradation mechanism that caused the crack indication shall be at the next refueling outage. If definitive information, such as from examination of a pulled tube, diagnostic non-destructive testing, or engineering evaluation indicates that a crack-like indication is not associated with a crack(s), then the indication need not be treated as a crack.
e. Provisions for monitoring operational primary-to-secondary leakage.

SALEM - UNIT 2 6-19e Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

2. WCAP-8385, Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures -

Topical Report, (W Proprietary) Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference

3. WCAP-10054-P-A, Westinghouse Small Break ECCS Evaluation Model Using NOTRUMP Code, (W Proprietary), Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor.
4. WCAP-10266-P-A, The 1981 Version of Westinghouse Evaluation Model Using BASH Code, (W Proprietary) Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor.
5. WCAP-12472-P-A, BEACON - Core Monitoring and Operations Support System, (W Proprietary).
6. CENPD-397-P-A, Improved Flow Measurement Accuracy Using Crossflow Ultrasonic Flow Measurement Technology
7. WCAP-10054-P-A, Addendum 2, Addendum to the Westinghouse Small Break ECCS Evaluation Model Using the NOTRUMP Code: Safety Injection into the Broken Loop and COSI Condensation Model.
c. The core operating limits shall be determined such that all applicable limits (e.g.,

fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) limits, nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits) of the safety analysis are met.

d. The COLR, including any mid-cycle revisions or supplements shall be provided upon issuance for each reload cycle to the NRC.

6.9.1.10 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTION REPORT A report shall be submitted within 180 days after the initial entry into HOT SHUTDOWN following completion of an inspection performed in accordance with the Specification 6.8.4.i, Steam Generator (SG) Program. The report shall include:

a. The scope of inspections performed on each SG;
b. Then nondestructive examination techniques utilized for tubes with increased degradation susceptibility;
c. For each degradation mechanism found:
1. The nondestructive examination techniques utilized;
2. The location, orientation (if linear), measured size (if available), and voltage response for each indication. For tube wear at support structures less than 20 percent through-wall, only the total number of indications needs to be reported; SALEM - UNIT 2 6-24a Amendment No. 320

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

3. A description of the condition monitoring assessment and results, including the margin to the tube integrity performance criteria and comparison with the margin predicted to exist at the inspection by the previous forward-looking tube integrity assessment;
4. The number of tubes plugged during the inspection outage; and
d. An analysis summary of the tube integrity conditions predicted to exist at the next scheduled inspection (the forward-looking tube integrity assessment) relative to the applicable performance criteria, including the analysis methodology, inputs, and results.
e. The number and percentage of tubes plugged to date, and the effective plugging percentage in each SG;
f. The results of any SG secondary side inspections.

SPECIAL REPORTS 6.9.2 Special reports shall be submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Administrator, USNRC Region I within the time period specified for each report.

6.9.3 DELETED 6.9.4 When a report is required by ACTION 1, 4, 8 OR 9 of Table 3.3-11 "Accident Monitoring Instrumentation", a report shall be submitted within the following 14 days. The report shall outline the preplanned alternate method of monitoring for inadequate core cooling, the cause of the inoperability, and the plans and schedule for restoring the instrument channels to OPERABLE status.

SALEM - UNIT 2 6-24b Amendment No. 320

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 338 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 AND AMENDMENT NO. 320 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-75 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 Application Safety Evaluation Date April 28, 2021, ADAMS Accession September 3, 2021 No. ML21118B060 Principal Contributors to Safety Evaluation Clinton Ashley

1.0 PROPOSED CHANGE

S PSEG Nuclear LLC (the licensee) requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, by license amendment request (LAR). In its LAR, the licensee requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) process the proposed amendment under the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CLIIP). The proposed changes would revise the Salem Steam Generator (SG) Program and the Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report TSs based on Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-577, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections (TSTF-577) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML21060B434), and the associated NRC staff safety evaluation (SE) of TSTF-577 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21098A188).

The tubes within an SG function as an integral part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary and, in addition, isolate fission products in the primary coolant from the secondary coolant and the environment. SG tube integrity means that the tubes are capable of performing this safety Enclosure 3

function in accordance with the plant design and licensing basis. Salem, Unit No. 1, SGs have Alloy 600 thermally treated (Alloy 600TT) tubes and Unit No. 2 SGs have Alloy 690 thermally treated (Alloy 690TT) tubes.

1.1 Proposed TS Changes to Adopt TSTF-577 In accordance with NRC staff-approved TSTF-577, the licensee proposed changes that would revise Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, TS 6.8.4.i, Steam Generator (SG) Program, and TS 6.9.1.10, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report. Specifically, the licensee proposed the following changes to adopt TSTF-577 (note: the brackets at the end of each bullet below designate Salem unit applicability):

TS 6.8.4.i, Steam Generator (SG) Program:

TS 6.8.4.i.d.2 would be revised by deleting the requirement to base inspection frequency on the more restrictive metric between either the effective full power months (EFPM) or refueling outage and to use just the EFPM metric. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

TS 6.8.4.i.d.2 would be revised by deleting the allowance to extend the inspection period by 3 months and by deleting the discussion of prorating inspections. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

TS 6.8.4.i.d.3 would be revised from shall not exceed 24 effective full power months or one refueling outage (whichever results in more frequent inspections) to shall be at the next refueling outage. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

TS 6.8.4.i.d would be revised by adding a phrase regarding portions of the tube that are exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria. [Salem, Unit No. 1].

TS 6.8.4.i.d.2 would be revised by changing the requirement to inspect 100 percent of the tubes during each period in paragraphs d.2.a, d.2.b, and d.2.c (120, 96, and 72 EFPM, respectively) and by adding a requirement to inspect 100 percent of the tubes in each SG at least every 54 EFPM, which defines the inspection period. A 72 EFPM inspection period would be permitted if none of the SG tubes has ever experienced cracking (not including regions exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria) and the SG inspection was performed with enhanced probes. [Salem, Unit No. 1].

TS 6.8.4.i.d.3 would be revised by adding a phrase regarding portions of the tube that are exempt from inspection by alternate repair criteria. An additional phrase would be added that permits deferring SG inspections after crack indications are found if the 100 percent inspection of all SGs was performed with enhanced probes. [Salem, Unit No. 1].

TS 6.8.4.i.d.2 would be revised by deleting the requirement to inspect 100 percent of the tubes during each period in paragraphs d.2.a, d.2.b, d.2.c, and d.2.d (144, 120, 96, and 72 EFPM, respectively) and by adding the requirement to inspect 100 percent of the tubes in each SG every 96 EFPM, which defines the inspection period. [Salem, Unit No.

2].

TS 6.9.1.10, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report:

Existing reporting requirement b. would be renumbered as c. and be revised by editorial and punctuation changes. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

New reporting requirement b. would be added to require the nondestructive examination (NDE) techniques utilized for tubes with increased degradation susceptibility to be reported. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirement c. would be renumbered as c.1. and be revised by editorial and punctuation changes. [Salem Unit, Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirement d. would be renumbered as c.2. and be revised to note that the location, orientation (if linear), measured size (if available), and voltage response do not need to be reported for tube wear indications at support structures that are less than 20 percent through-wall. However, the total number of tube wear indications at support structures that are less than 20 percent through-wall would be reported. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

New reporting requirement d. would be added to require an analysis summary of the tube integrity conditions predicted to exist at the next scheduled inspection relative to the applicable performance criteria, including the analysis, methodology, inputs, and results.

[Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirement e. would be renumbered as c.4. and be revised by editorial and punctuation changes. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirements f. and h. would be combined, be renumbered as e., and be revised by editorial and punctuation changes. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

New reporting requirement f. would be added to require the results of any SG secondary side inspections to be reported. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirement g. would be renumbered as c.3. and be revised to add the requirements to report the margin to the tube integrity performance criteria and a comparison with the margin predicted to exist at the inspection by the previous forward-looking tube integrity assessment. In addition, the requirement to report the results of tube pulls and in-situ testing would be deleted. [Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2].

Existing reporting requirements h., i., and j. would be renumbered as g., h., and i.,

respectively. [Salem, Unit No. 1].

1.2 Additional Proposed TS Changes In addition to the changes proposed consistent with the traveler discussed in Section 1.1, the licensee proposed the following variations.

1.2.1 Editorial Variations The licensee noted that Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, TSs have different numbering than standard technical specifications (STSs). Also, the licensee proposed to replace existing occurrences of the term Steam Generator with the abbreviation SG and a Steam Generator with an SG.

1.2.2 Other Variations The licensee noted that the Salem, Unit No. 1, SG Program TS currently contains a provision for an alternate tube plugging or repair criteria and that the descriptions of the alternate tube plugging or repair criteria in the proposed change are equivalent to the descriptions in the current TS.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) paragraph 50.36(c)(5),

Administrative controls, state that [a]dministrative controls are the provisions relating to organization and management, procedures, recordkeeping, review and audit, and reporting necessary to assure operation of the facility in a safe manner. Each licensee shall submit any reports to the Commission pursuant to approved technical specifications as specified in

[10 CFR] 50.4. Technical Specification Section 5.0, Administrative Controls, requires that an SG Program be established and implemented to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained.

Programs established by the licensee, including the SG Program, are listed in the administrative controls section of the TS to operate the facility in a safe manner.

The NRC staffs guidance for the review of TSs is in NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR [Light-Water Reactor]

Edition (SRP), Chapter 16.0, Technical Specifications, Revision 3, dated March 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100351425). As described therein, as part of the regulatory standardization effort, the NRC staff has prepared STSs for each of the LWR nuclear designs.

Accordingly, the NRC staffs review includes consideration of whether the proposed changes are consistent with NUREG-14311 as modified by NRC-approved travelers.

TSTF-577 revised the STSs related to SG tube inspections and SG tube inspection reporting requirements. The NRC approved TSTF-577, under the CLIIP on April 14, 2021 (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML21099A086).

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3.1 Proposed TS Changes to Adopt TSTF-577 The NRC staff compared the licensees proposed TS changes in Section 1.1 of this SE against the changes approved in TSTF-577. In accordance with SRP Chapter 16.0, the NRC staff determined that the STS changes approved in TSTF-577 are applicable because Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, are pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and the NRC staff approved the TSTF-577 changes for PWRs. The NRC staff finds that the licensees proposed changes to the 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants, NUREG-1431, Volume 1, Specifications, and Volume 2, Bases, Revision 4, April 2012 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12100A222 and ML12100A228, respectively).

Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, TSs in Section 1.1 of this SE are consistent with those found acceptable in TSTF-577.

In the SE of TSTF-577, the NRC staff concluded that the TSTF-577 changes to STS 5.5.9, Steam Generator (SG) Program, and STS 5.6.7, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report, were acceptable because, as discussed in Section 3.0 of that SE, they continued to ensure SG tube integrity and, therefore, protected the public health and safety. In particular, the structural integrity performance criterion and accident-induced leakage performance criterion (explained in STS 5.5.9.b, items 1 and 2, respectively) will continue to be met with the proposed revised SG inspection intervals (maximum allowable time between SG inspections) and inspection periods (maximum allowable time between 100 percent of SG tubes inspections). Additionally, the proposed changes to the reporting requirements will provide more detailed and consistent information to the NRC. Therefore, the NRC staff found that the proposed changes to the SG program and inspection reporting requirements were acceptable because they continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(5) by providing administrative controls necessary to assure operation of the facility in a safe manner. For these same reasons, the NRC staff concludes that the corresponding proposed changes to the Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, TSs in Section 1.1 of this SE continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(5).

3.2 Additional Proposed TS Changes 3.2.1 Editorial Variations The licensee noted that Salem, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, TSs have different numbering than STS.

Also, the licensee proposed to replace existing occurrences of the term Steam Generator with the abbreviation SG and a Steam Generator with an SG. The NRC staff finds that these changes are acceptable because they do not substantively alter TS requirements.

3.2.2 Other Variations The licensee noted that the Salem, Unit No. 1, SG Program TS currently contains a provision for an alternate tube plugging or repair criteria and that the descriptions of the alternate tube plugging or repair criteria in the proposed change are equivalent to the descriptions in the current TS.

The NRC staff notes that alternate tube plugging or repair criteria are permitted by the STSs.

The current Salem, Unit No. 1, TS that addresses alternate tube plugging criteria (i.e.,

TS 6.8.4.i.c) reflects NRC-approved changes described in Amendment No. 303 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13072A105) and in Amendment No. 309 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15153A230). As part of the request to adopt TSTF-577, the licensee did not propose any changes to these criteria. Therefore, the staff considers this noted variation as information for awareness purposes, rather than a variation from the traveler or a change to the plant-specific TS.

3.3 TS Change Consistency The NRC staff reviewed the proposed TS changes for technical clarity and consistency with the existing requirements for customary terminology and formatting. The staff finds that the proposed changes are consistent with Chapter 16.0 of the SRP and are therefore acceptable.

4.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) there is reasonable assurance that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

NOTICES AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 338 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 AND AMENDMENT NO. 320 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-75 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 Application Safety Evaluation Date April 28, 2021, ADAMS Accession September 3, 2021 No. ML21118B060

1.0 INTRODUCTION

PSEG Nuclear LLC (the licensee) requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, by license amendment request (LAR). In its LAR, the licensee requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) process the proposed amendment under the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CLIIP). The proposed changes would revise the Steam Generator (SG)

Program and the Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report TSs based on Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-577, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections (TSTF-577) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML21060B434), and the associated NRC staff safety evaluation (SE) of TSTF-577 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21098A188).

2.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the New Jersey State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments on July 6, 2021. The State official had no comments.

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendments relate, in part, to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements. The amendments also relate, in part, to changing requirements with respect to the installation or use of facility components located within the restricted area as defined in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding Enclosure 4

published in the Federal Register on June 15, 2021 (86 FR 31743). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9) and 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.

ML21202A078 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL1/PM NRR/DORL/LPL1/LAiT NRR/DORL/LPL3/LA NRR/DSS/STSB/BC(A)

NAME JKim KEntz SRohrer NJordan DATE 7/21/2021 7/26/2021 7/27/2021 06/16/2021 OFFICE OGC - NLO NRR/DORL/LPL1/BC NRR/DORL/LPL1/PM NAME JWachutka JDanna JKim DATE 8/13/2021 9/3/2021 9/3/2021