ML21013A505

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Initial License Exam Form ES-201-2
ML21013A505
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/2020
From:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Nuclear Management Co
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML19127A315 List:
References
Download: ML21013A505 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Monticello Date of Examination: 10/12/20 Initials Item Task Description a

b' c"

1.
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

?1; Q w

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

'I {){.

R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

,/)

I T

C, Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

.'-h VJt T

a E

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

/) Ct..

N

2.
a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of

/> ().

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s

transients.

I M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

,1 Qt L

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at

,.9 A

least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

C.

/)

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D and in

{)(.,

Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).

3.
a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1)

The ouUine(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form.

),~ [li_

A (2)

Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3)

No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K (4)

The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5)

The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H

tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1)

The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

A Qk'.

G (2)

At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3)

No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.

C.

Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

-~

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

t1 QI...

4.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual f)(,

plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

tJ G

" ';)I(

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

/;)

N

  • 1 01..

E C, Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

h R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.
0 fJt..

A A,. V_

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

,,4) '..\\'.

.,..,--)

Printed_ Na!11e/S_ig_~t~~ -; _, 7

~

a.

Author D~f~~v~~ /&il:.£:'

b.

Facility Reviewer(')

1./

C.

NRC Chief Examiner(#)

d.

NRG Supeivisor

  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

Charles D. Zoia Digitally signed by Charles D. Zoia Date: 2020.05.19 15:31:04 -05'00' Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2020.05.20 15:51:40 -05'00'