ML20238B296
| ML20238B296 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1987 |
| From: | ABB IMPELL CORP. (FORMERLY IMPELL CORP.) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-5-A-012D, OL-5-A-12D, NUDOCS 8709010156 | |
| Download: ML20238B296 (32) | |
Text
... . LIL.C o Gx & nhihN I 2 cl 50-32.2-06 5 5jie/g 7 m r-
/9 - /2 3
'87 AL7i 20 P4 :33 r u.
RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS l
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) !ODULE l RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OBSERVER DATA Facility: 10 ( I )n: ' II:" t V.in . .i )
Date: :- c. * *> ' 7
Ch ,u yy . '
Specific Assignment: Czo 6 u/e . IXo- N ee st o o d Team Leader: __
Name:
Organization: -% r: ' l l
Titie: E' b i *ee.-
Business Address: . A C C 8A'.. ./ R / c.J [ / , /77elv .':.
Business Phone:
8709010156 87051R PDR ADOCK 05000322 !
G PDR l
l
\ _-__--__-_---__w
R@At #FCULAmRY C005133108 Bodel fla. hb *)I E' b ' c,fficial gig, no. I 7,_d
> the rasner of h10 rt.baM hh? k 6 RW 7boCY I!d'
- - . . - - . . . . MkTIFilC
/
!.- SLCE!VED
______ . RIJECTED p 4 u,e.
s,Wter \
T* \ \N
\ 2 l
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . e
INSTRUCTIONS Introduction This form is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and evaluating an exercise. There are several different " modules" corresponding to Pfferent observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should hav0 the "EOC Module", an observer assigned to the Emergency News Center should have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on. The module you have should correspond to your assignment.
You should bring the fom along with you when you go to observe. The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to look for.
You may w1sh to fill out lome or all of the questions while on location.
NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is rated under another part of the response organization, i
Directly below is a short explanation of what is in the form and how to !
fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible. !
Concept of Form and Instructions for Use (1) Structure and Format. Each module is composed of several sections. Eacn section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example, " equipment,"
" communications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two parts. The first part is a series of questions for you to rate the perfomance. The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay sumarizirig your overali impressions.
(2) Rating Questions. You have four options when answering these questions: Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0.
o " Satisfactory" means that personne! and equipment performed at an ac:eptable level. Errors noted were not severe and the task was completed in an acceptable manner. For )
example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once everj 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks his dosimeter only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, his perfonnance is satisfactory. However, your narrative summary should explain the rating, o " Unsatisfactory" means that personnel and equipment generally performed below.an acceptable level. There were i
deficiencies of a significant nature. The area's ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.
l e .#
e
. . :: . ... A :
i o "N/A" stands for "not applicable." Fo r example , i f the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced or checked?
should be "not applicable". In some cases, a wnole section may be not applicable. For exa.mple, if you will be observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your EOC module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media relations are conducted at another facility.
o "N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was done properly. If something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory".
(3) Short answer questions. These are generally self-explanatory.
Most are informational, asking you to list the participants at your location, or to describe a certain procedure observed, etc. Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived. Be alert for these events. )
1 I
(4) Sucinary. On the summary page, you should write a brief essay j (one paragraph to one page) to describe and evaluate the i
1 i activities and resources covered by that section. Describe the j resources available and what occurred, in your own words. You j should cover the main points raised in the rating and short J answer questions, and any other observations you consider f relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or "ljnsacisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are encouraged. j Miscellaneous Notes (1) The front cover of the critique fom has blank lines for you to i l write your name, assignment, etc.
l (2) Please do not use blue ink - it does not photo-copy.
Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on this form will be i the basis for future reports and decisions. Be thorough and clear; this will c'eoid the necessity of contacting you later for clarification.
f
e EMERGErCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMEJjQ I. Opera; ions Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was an individual effectively , , ,
in charge? V
- 2. If so, name this individual.
- 3. Was the person in charge the person so designated in the plan? /
- 4. Is there a direct link to the ,
onsite emergency organization? v
- 5. Was this link effectively /
utilized?
l 6. Was information and data trans-I mitted from the onsite emergency ,
organization in a timely manner? v dec dtw. c,su s-;,w,* c),cq kM dW6c t.n,o C bte ni, :, chh Q ig gk'F m cs Th bl ig, g g , , ( ,,lt 7
1 ces uu+ 1 ace ;w aw,9 or; n.
l l
l l
a____-_________.
1 1
9 9 Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnance.
i l
1 i
l
)
l
)
i l
l l
l 1
l l l 1
II. Dose Assessment and Protective A: tion Recommendations A. Dose Projection Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Were expected doses derived from:
- plant release data? v'
- field readings? ./ _ _
- 2. Was the ability to make dose calculations via computer or programable calculator demonstrated effectively? V_
l 3. Were hand calculations demonstrated effectively? An og,,,pu eure v' ukspuhvud
- 4. Were dose calculations made promptly? '/
- 5. Were dose calculations checked l
for accuracy? V
- 6. Was field monitoring data promptly and accurazely plotted on a map? '/
- 7. Were monitor teams promptly directed to new locations, to define the extent of the plume? #
- 8. Was the plume correctly defined? /
- 9. Did field readings come in promptly? /
?x a - v..m .. e .c:: m:>. s ewvi
- 10. Was there' a periodic estimation of total population exposure? #
10a. Where field data became available were dose calculations reassessed premptly? /
B. Protective Action Recommendations
- 11. Were the procedures followed for reaching protective acticn decisions with respect to:
- plume pathway hazards? ,
- ingestion pathway hazards? v
- 12. Were the decisions cased on EPA exposure guidelines?
- plume pathway V
- ingestion pathway v k_.___________________
Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 13. Were procedures followed and other factors (e.g. plant status, evacuation time estimates, weather) considered in making the protective action recommendation for:
- plume pathway /
- ingestion pathway /
~
14 Were protective action recommendations promptly reviewed and updated as conditions changed?
- plume pathway V
- ingestion pathway / __
- 15. Were protective action recommendations coordinated among states (if more than A//l one state was involved)?
- plume pathway .
- ingestion pathway
- 16. Was use of KI recommended for:
- emergency workers in the field? v'
- selected populations (persons whose imediate evacuation man be infeasible or very difficult)? N/A
- the general population? r4/A
- 17. Were decisions about KI (whether or not its use was recomended)
- consistent with the plan? -
- properly based on actual or expected radiof odine release? / ~
cleeisicsiuac j> u h sc/v:,e a/ ,,,5+,,,;y ,
J
- 18. If use of KI was recomended:
- Who gave the authorization? f/u/d h.cc fe,< / ~
- When was this decision reached? / ao ( G u.f,rie vr.[~I7)
- When, and to whom, was it '
transmitted? Shten .4 d u 4 /2<4.vu (
4ditt Yidios a
e e l
i i
Sumary ,
i I
In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the. facts recorded in the questions in perspective. !
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
l 1
-7
III. Protective Action A. Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was active.+1on of traffic control points promptly ordered? N/A
- 2. Were estimates of expected traffic volume discussed? N/A
- 3. According to EOC staff, are appro-priate resources available to keep evacuation routes clear:
- Du ring bad weather? N/A
- In event of stalled or wrecked cars? N/A l
l 4. Were these resources activated for the exertise? N/A
- 5. Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the contaminated area:
- All roads blocked? N/A l
- Ai r traffi ' rerouted? N/A
- Water traffic stopped? W7K-
- Rail traffic stopped? N/ A G. According to EOC staff, are local resources adequate to cover all traffic and access control functions simultaneously:
- In terms of available personnel? N/A
- In terms of available vehicles? ~i000-
~~
- If not, was help promptly requested? __
N/A l 7. Were relocation centers ordered to be activated in a timely f ashion: _ ,,,_
N/A
B. Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was evacuation of onsite individuals N/A demonstrated?
- 2. If so was it: I 1
- Promptly activated? --
N/A
- Well organized? N/A
- 3. Were the EOC staff aware of the location of mobility-impaired indi-viduals in the area (whether insti-N/A tutionalized or at home)?
N/A
- 4. Was this infonnation in written form?
l 5. Were they aware of these persons par-ticular special needs? N/A
- 6. Was this information in written form? N/A
- 7. Were arrangements made for transpor-tation of these persons? N/A
- 8. If school children are to be evacu-ated by bus:
- According to participants, are enoug5 buses and drivers available to cover the schools in the plume EPZ? N/A
- How are drivers contacted?
- Was contact of drivers demonstrated? N/A
- Was an EBS message prepared to inform parents as to where children were being taken? N/A l
- 9. (Whether or not schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic jams (of parents) at the schools? N/A i
1 j 1
L________________
Pathway .. Sat /
stion of Inge ntat oin on ~-
Impleme available C.
v' ~ ~~'"~~~
information v current i of: 7 MeO 1 Was the locat on /
plants? _
fams?sing intake points?
DairyFood processupply available
( ~l Water there detailed mapsinformation?
made re-t GA N'"ll
- 2. Werewing crop s werey protectiven?
sho nd: tion od trichvt ingestion pathwa thgy based odlbhais;0D
- 3. What reco:::me nd gardingctions, a what were a
N[C is there -
ff t0 #h o '
d st mers,$ s.
t ording fa d ions?
- 4. Acc body o ith utilities, an a
individua33y r w wof{'fhp#eent 5em ProtectiV' l
l l
e j,-
.- J i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ ___________n _
I' l l
Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the f acts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances.
1 I
l I
l l
l
IV. Radiological Exposure Control Answer the following questions only if this A ECC is in the plume (10-eile) EPZ, or if N JI dosimetry was distributed to field workers from this EOC.
Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was the following dosimetry equipment available:
(Direct-Read Dosimaters)
- Low range (0-200 mR)?
- Mid range (0-20 R)? ,_
- High range (0-200 R)?
- Charger for the dosimeters?
- Recc.*d keeping cards?
- Permanent record dosimeters, as film badges or TLD's?
- 2. Was the supply of dosimeters adequate:
- 3. Were appropriate instructions issued along with the dosimeters?
4.
Was iodide an(KI adeq)uate supply of potassium available? __
- 5. Was someone there aware of proper pr ocedures concerning its use? ,__
- 6. Was someone there aware of the maximum dose allowed without authorization?
- 7. Was someone there aware of decontam-ination procedures (i.e. , when and where to go for decontamination)? __
- 8. If the EOC was in the pleme, were
, measures taken to protect the EOC personnel against exposure (e.g.,
closing down ventilation)?
Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances.
l
V. Recovery and Re-Entry Yes No N/A N/0
- 1. If evacuation was ordered:
- Were arrangements made to secure the evacuated areas? N/A
- Were policy / procedures developed on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g.,
to milk dairy cows)? N/A
- 2. Was relaxation of protective actions based on monitor data indicating safe levels of radioactivity? /
- 3. Werc re-entry / recovery decisions communicated promptly to all response organizations? Y
- 4. Were arrangements made to provide the public with information on:
- Safety precautions during recovery? N/C
- Possible health effects of low-level er.posure? NF
- Availability of compensation for financial losses sustained? _
N/A i CE C C H e y l Y C - C *(Nu.p G Q 1ry.fl831 IlNl<0 u 8 0 yas( r !C-cin .it k u n on ctiac o.
l l
I 1
i i
Summary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances. 1 1
i l
l 1
VI. Scenario Sumary Consent on the adequacy of the scenario. Did it provide enough activity? Was it realistic? Did it test areas of earlier deficiency?
dlL W * !G u c' Lc-3 izcl if Lkd LLiCLTL > m +5Lic i:
as way e n ,s,a < va;pc ,,,p eno,,e si,,aaaao h<l et ud cf fud t an 10 c a. t t g a c t t, u i
eyews.
- ue,yar<us"pAhcaiu ostcpuund cpau m x (p.tp,cc3.uquJca l c , t ct C0scassai mii nait " Ifi vu /apcut C'"Tf (
c1A 4. EOF.
7c ct,,i 3 pcilti odct catt t ciw ist}-tius ctsil .
1
,. '\
n,7 y c' 9/ 2 /
4v g; , ,1(
l's o. r bs G * . /g C ' ,f ,u , . her. s
, 'I
/
.,t-9.- /?i. r i A r m - iJ ' < TO ' S ' ,
^, a az;/gtg . t,
. - L, .'-aw .1
,' :e-'
$ b"
.,,.,n, k_ L% ,*;t,z 7:yi* . t[* .y.* o.'f .,,e ,. , ra .. .r. :e ;
. :.. J
?-
" , e -/ csef.' !
- .. ~. .. .. ' yc* t
.x ?. : , < <.. w : v-s .* *yW // o * - OC ~ Y/ M '! "" ' _
w+*< 4 -as yt .)/ % ;, s e w-y - wey,.u eli s cycz ;<b d
- 4 Ec
- \ r;:e *w c* OA%e d- C ' 'b i # ' ' "~
' ,,. t t , ?...:<
C935 6f tL h.r J 3a iJ a' ,. % ;! s'. .r a n 4 Ac NECT /14 s ,ay g e _.; ,.,, i ', '
a,,i y,, ,,.
O'a n +
YY m~!u s r'?ceJ J i hNI E 3AE S ' " ' '
)
' /
~
c,) e'
j_)(' t'~ 'li C 1> 3
- N b. .b "'I E3k '.l / [kN W j '-', ! '
FC c-4 rvs k '. ' ,~ cl' // . ~iHyc s , , 3 .v
- A ,, .7 3 -
, 9gg ih it' 4 3 / % t ,e c , < b >, C 4 ca . /4, . ,s.
t ,.,, .e ,v.Ju. .' r s
/,
Y
' ' ' * 3 ' ': rirc'k Q-l b; i , ,.' .
E L' ah lD u f1'"' 0 }' ' kl
/~diT b i( U l '-t a U- Oin J . A(._xp q 4c,g fc C- p r_ -
- ~+
hsG. it:l o; a n
-c T r _ssh l : - "'.- U(-' n ~ ' *. .
._~T~.1u,[
lb c , , <, , , ' /," > <' ,,(,)
7 Cu6 7, . s, ,
( g ( ,. , /. to f n ,, ,.
'> '< ' <~ p' " -
u.<,e
,g ,, t v o -h . c , ,,/
' t. v s
Yb*.- - n m .iu4 s
'/ b ra ;i g. , A -n -
T > b . ~r- (, .
se n i
g , ,7, , ,% , ,, ,1 ,.
- e (tve t e 3 )
S
(. f l9 [f: . Ws0J' L *
.r~ *
- J
'.) = ' f 4, ,
s
.'<- f' % .
. O b% -
%qh R .
$ b*
g g* ,
\'l 30k r aeei' , -
.e oa& '; J , j ,+. , . ,, . :
\
Y w a. _, ,
s r,s ea , _ m: m. p % . . i. - .
b ' ' filf / Y r C * .
01 L i}, r '
- m-E',e ,*'.u,'
'('t h \,, \? ,' ; ;-,. E'y.
k ,", - i gg, btI d b '
x.w- .
G& *
- Q;,"(( g '
~
1:
1 ls( Q.. ~ U.k 1.sf*LA c' 1 & ll*>.L:4-y/l /.t.I .f IQLL 2,'L' ( ,, (f , k < ,'d L *' r cr &.LM ' 5 U a ,. . .. .u . e .w. a i
RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE SPECIAL EVACUATIONS OBSERVER DATA Facility: V__G C.__ l Date: \DkIE Specific Assignment: %9WNA\ h \\\\ \* "g i Team Leader: _
Name:
Organization: _ __
Title:
Business Address: 4') Sr M LhM N t '">'aG Business Phone: _
l 1
l INSTRUCTIONS, Introduction This fom is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and evaluating an exercise. There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should have the "EOC Module", an observer assigned to the Emergency News Center should have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on. The module you have should correspond to your assignment.
You should bring the fom along with you when you go to observe. The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to look for.
You may wish to fill out some or all of the questions while on location.
NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is rated under another part of the response organization.
Of rectly below is a snort explanation of what is in the form and how to fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible.
Concept of Form and Instructions for Use (1) Structure and Format. Each module is composed of several sections. Eacn section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example, " equipment,"
" communications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two parts. The first part is a series of questions for you to rate the performance. The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay summarizing your overall impressions.
1 (2) Rating Questions. You have four options when answering these questions: Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0. {
o " Satisfactory" means that personnel and equipment performed at an acceptable level.
' Errors noted were not severe and i the task was completed in an acceptable manner. For '
example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks his dosimeter only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, y his perfomance is satisfactory. However, your narrative ;
summary should explain the rating.
o " Unsatisfactory" means that personnel and equipment generally performed below an acceptable level. There were deficiencies of a significant nature. The area's ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.
j
i i
o "N/A" stands for "not applicable." For exaniple, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced ot c ecked? ,
should be "not applicable". In some cases, a whole section I may be not applicable. For example, if you will be l observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your F,0C l module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since i media relations are conducted at another facility, o "N/0" stand for "not observed"; cear.ing you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was done properly. If i something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn' t, then you should mark "unsatisf actory".
(3) Short answer questions. These are generally self-explanatory.
Most are informational, asking you to list the participants at i your location, or to describe a certain procedure observed, e tc. Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived. Be alert for these events.
(4) Summa ry. On the summary page, you should write a brief essay (one paragraph to one page) to describe and evaluate the activities and resources covered by that section. Describe the ,
resources available and what occurred, in your own words. You should cover the main points raised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations you consider relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or " Unsatisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are encouraged. !
Miscellaneous Notes j l
(1) The front cover of the critique form has blank lines for you to write your name, assignment, etc. !
(2) Please do net use blue ink - it does not photo-copy.
Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on this form will be the basis for future reports and decisions. Be thorough and clear; this will avoid the necessity of contacting you later for clarification.
I l
l l
i l
l l \
l l
_2-
I. Evacuation Operations Management Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was an individual effecitvely in charge?
- 2. If so name this ir.dividual. l
- 3. Was the person in charge the person so designated in the plan? ______
- 4. Were periodic briefings held, to l update staff on the situation?
- 5. Were staff (as appropriate) involved in decisionmaking? ,
- 6. Was a copy of the plan available for reference?
- 7. Did staff have written procedures or checklists for reference?
- 8. Were message logs kept?
- 9. Were messages reproduced and dis-tributed, if appropriate? ,
- 10. If so, was message handling ,
e fficient? l l
- 11. Was access to the EOC controlled? N/A
- 12. When was the EOC notified on the following events (as applicable)?
- Pl ant at " Alert" status N/A
- Plant at " Site Area Dnergency" status N/A
- Plant at " General Emergency" status N/A
- 13. When were the following protective action orders issued (or received)?
- Take shelter ~
N/A
- Evacuate N/A
Sat Unsat N/A N/0 )
i
- 14. If appropriate, were actions taken to coordinate emergency activiites, such as (indicate time, or write "No,"
"N/A," or "N/0"):
- Call placed to activate radiological monitoring teams? N/A
- Call placed to activate relocation center? N/A
- 15. Was Federal assistance requested? N/A
- 16. If so, indicate who requested it N/A and what they asked for:
1' l
l l
l l
l l 1 L_______________________________.______._____ _ _ _ ______________J
- $*&<$# lo IMAGE EVALUATION
//// c.,$Ng,
((o'dt'h
TEST TARGET (MT-3) g
+ s 1.0 lff a El u m p=
tm l,l IE b 1.8 l
1.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm >
4 6" >
b ok %7, -
/!b
<> a /4 4> *vu3 o,
7//
<p+% 4+
s$+
\
4 %ft k M' IMAGE EVALUATION
////
//o/ e[ /
TEST TARGET (MT-3) / d*4g*
+ <-
1.0 lf a M y3M i,l !!!!M
[2 l.8 I l .4 1.6 I l.25 'I l
l 4 150mm >
4 6" >
@!V,># $
07 h.(6.fr,Q c{b
_ ____ . ____:=___-_______ __-______1-__--_________________-_--_
$e ?' $# 9 S0 g
IMAGE EVALUATION fe 4,
//o jp// 9,@O'
\ # 4**c%ff TEST TARGET (MT-3) /
- /(,4&
- 4#,
$p W' %,, ;;yh
+gp,/ <a 1.0 5lN [:1 Ikills M i,l ((E WlE I.8 1.25 1.4 i.6 l4 150mm >
4 6" >
h
$?%i
<> .a, ,
/<> !b J/h
'v
- ,C& 4*4 1
O
Sunnary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances.
l l
1 l
l l
II. Protective Action A. Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was activation of traffic control points promptly ordered? __
N/A
- 2. Were estimates of expected traffic volume discussed? N/A
- 3. According to EOC staff, are appro- ,
priate resources available to keep evacuation routes clear:
- During bad weather? N/A
- In event of stalled or wrecked cars? N/A l 4. Were these resources activated for the exercise? ,,____
- 5. Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the ;
contaminated area:
- All roads blocked? N/A
- 7Gl~ traffic rerouted? ~
N/A
- Water traffic stopped? N/A ;
- Rail traffic stopped? N7X-i
- 6. According to E0C staff, are local resources adequate to cover all traffic and access control functions simul taneously:
- In terms of available personnel? N/A
- In terms of available vehicles? N/A ~~
- If not, was help promptly requested? N/A l 7. Were relocation centers ordered to be activated in a timely fashion: N/A l
i 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - - - - - . - - - _ _ _ - - J
B. Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was evacuation of onsite individuals demonstrated? ,N/A
- 2. If so was it:
- Promptly activated? N/A
- Well organized? N/A _
- 3. Were the E0C staff aware of the location of mobility-impaired indi-viduals in the area (whether insti-tutionalized or at home)?
- 4. Was this information in written form?
l
- 5. Were EOC staff aware of the particular special needs of mobility-impaired f residents? , l
- 6. Was this infomation in written fom?
- 7. Were arrangements made for transpor-tation cf mcbility-impaired persons? [
- 8. If school children are '.o be evacu- I ated by bus:
{ n { %
- According to participants are enough N( -
buses and drivers available to cover '
the schools in the plume EPZ? ~~~
N/A
- Ho. are drivers contacted?
D G
- Was contact of drivers demonstrated? N/A
- Was an EBS message prepared to inform parents as to where children were being taken? N/A
- 9. (Whether or not schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic jams (of parents) at the schools? N/A _
C. Implementation of Ingestion Pathway' Protective Actions Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was current information available on the location of:
- Dairy f arms? N/A
- Food processing plants? [ N/A _
- Water supply intake points? N/A
- 2. Were there detailed maps available showing crop information? N/A
- 3. What recommendations were made re- N/A garding ingestion pathway protective actions, and what were they based on?
- 4. According to EOC staff, is there a body of trained staff to work individually with farmers, food-workers, water utilities, and so on to implement protective actions? N/A __
i Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances, i
l I
1 I
.g.
III. Radiological Exposure Control Answer the following questions only if this EOC is in the plume (10-< nile) EPZ, or if dosimetry was distributed to field workers from this EOC.
Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Was the following dosimetry equipment available:
(Direct-Read Dosimeters)
- Low range (0-200 mR)?
- Mid range (0-20 R)?
- High range (0-200 R)?
- Charger for the dosimeters?
- Record keeping cards?
- Permanent record dosimeters, as film badges or TLD's?
- 2. Was the supply of dosimeters adequate: _
- 3. Were appropriate instructions issued along with the dosimeters?
- 4. Was an adequate supply of potassium iodide (KI) available? ~
i l
- 5. Was someone there aware of proper ;
procedures concerning its use? l
- 6. Was someone there aware of the maximum dose allowed without authorization?
- 7. Was someone there aware of decontam-ination procedures (i.e., when and where to go for decontamination)?
- 8. If the E0C was in the plume, were measures taken to protect the E0C personnel against exposure (e.g.,
closing down ventilation)?
i I
Sunrnary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the ficts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
I i
I i
l l
l l
I l
l IV. Recovery and Re-Entry Sat Unsat N/A N/0
- 1. Tf evacuation was ordered:
- Were arrangements made to secure the evacuated areas? N/A l i
- Were policy / procedures developed on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g.,
to milk dairy cows)? N/A
- 2. Was relaxation of protective actions based on monitor data indicating safe levels of radioactivity? N/A
- 3. Were re-entry / recovery decisions communicated promptly to all response organizations?
- 4. Were arrangements made to provide the public with information on:
- Safety precautions during recovery? N/A
- Possible health effects of low-level exposure? N/A
- Availability of compensation for financial losses sustained? N/A l l
l I
l f