ML20211K042

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 8 to Procedure CP-QP-16.0, Nonconformances. Related Info Encl
ML20211K042
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/03/1983
From: Scott B
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20211J491 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-QP-16.0, NUDOCS 8606270134
Download: ML20211K042 (38)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. ISSUE l PROCEDURE REVISION PAGE .I NUMBER j DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO CPSES I CP-QP-16.0 i 8 1 1 of 7 i j lFEB 0 31983; i r I PREPARED BY: M 3 DATE NONCONFORMANCES APPROVED BY I / 3 ~ UATE l 0.\\ LY

1.0 REFERENCES

1-A CP-QP-15.0, " Tagging System" 1-B CP-SAP-6, " Control of Work on Station Components after tilSTORICAL FILE Release from Construction to TUGC0" 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this procedure is to establish a method ( of documenting the identification, resolution, and closecut of nonconfomances as defined in Parag,raph 2.2. It is the responsibility of all site employees to report items of nonconfonnance to their supervisor or to the TUGC0 Site l QA Supervisor. The requirements contained herein are applicable to nonconformances identified for materials, i services or items associated with safety-related structures, I systems and components not under the jurisdiction of the ASME Code, Section III, Division 1. I NOTE: When nonconfomances ar'e detected by inspection and testing, they shall be reported in accordance with quality procedures / instructions describing the inspection or testing functions. Where specific guidelines are not given in quality procedure / instructions, the provisions of this procedure shall govern. 2.2 DEFINITION 2.2.1 Nonconfomance A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure f which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or in-I detenninate. ( 8606270134 860517 h, j i i PDR FOIA f I = CARDE85-59 PDR y l TUGCC oA l e., % : 'S," nd-. T & --

. -... ~. - -._.--. __ ..( PR E E I REVISION PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. ( CPSES CP-QP-16.0 8 FEB 0 3 1981 2 of 7 t 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1, ,NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION 3.1.1 Field Identification ' When'a nonconfoming condition as defined in P.aragraph 2.2.1 is identified, the individual shall imediately apply a Hold l 1 A) and note his name and telephone Tag -(Reference-extension on the tag. He snall return and note on the Hold Tag the appropriate NCR number when obtained.from the NCR Coordinator, t NOTE: For electrical activities, the inspector may use his judgement to apply a Hold Tag to a nonconforming internal component. For example, the inspector may apply a Hold Tag to a broken / damaged terminal strip j and note on the Hold Tag wording such as " Applied to Teminal Strip Only." On the NCR the statement would be " Applied to Terminal Strip Only - other unrelated activities may proceed." 3.1.2 Reporting Nonconforming) conditions shall be reported on the NCR form (Attachment 1. Supporting documentation, e.g., Inspection Reports, NDE reports, drawings shall also be attached to the i NCR where appropriate. The system / subsystem number (with or without " Structure" information) shall be recorded on the NCR I fom. s NOTE: The system / subsystem number is not required for discrepancies relating to conduit, cable trays, protective coatings, cable tray hangers or anchor bolt locations provided that the structure is identified. The inspector will sign and forward the draft NCR to the Discipline QC Supervisor or designee. Individuals assigned to departments other than QA/QC shall forward the draft Nonconfomance Report to the NCR Coordinator for further processing. j 3.1.3 Numbering the NCR Before sending the NCR to the Quality Control Supervisor, or k his designee, the individual reporting the nonconformance I shall obtain a number from the TUGC0 NCR Coordinator. This TUGCO OA

e

( ~ (- PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO. f CPSES ,.EB 0 3 583 3 of 7 CP-QP-16.0 8 r . number shall be noted on the NCR. and on the Hold Tag per Reference ' 1-A that is ' applied to the nonconforming item / equipment. The NCR Coordinator shall assign numbers as follows: 'e.g. "NCR M 00214 80 sequential NCR number for that year year Discipiine (TnstumentatTon,.C_ivil) Mechanical, Electrical For NCR's on items / components turned over to TUGCO, the NCR Coordinator shall add the letter "S" after the NCR number. The NCR Coordinator enters the NCR number and brief description of the nonconforming condition in the NCR log (Attachment 2). { 4 3.1.4 Pre-Issuance Review The reported nonconformance shall be evaluated by the Discipline Quality Control Supervisor or his designee for clarity, accuracy, validity and specificity. 3.1.4.1 If the QA/QC Supervisors detennine the NCR to be not valid, he may void the NCR by stating under the disposition "Not a Nonconforming Condition" or similar wording and justification. 3.1.4.2 If the NCR is detennined to be val id, the Discipline QC Supervisor signs and forwards the draft NCR to the NCR Coordinator. 3.1.5 NCR Preparation The NCR Coordinator prepares a typed original using the information on the draft NCR and obtains the Discipline ..jj QC Scpervisor's signature. NOTE: The name of the person reporting the nonconforming i: condition is entered on the typed original but 't is not signed. I The NCR Coordinator enters the date issued in the NCR Log and forwards a copy of the NCR to an " Action Addressee". I moco oA p2 ?A.r9A , lf

1_ -.-_.___.2 7 PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE' NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. 1 ( CPSES CP-QP-16.0 8 FEB 0 31983 4 of 7 (The. " Action Adressee" nonnally is the responsible CPPE Discipline ~ Group' Supervisor who evaluates and di.spostitions.the reported nonconformances.) NOTE: For, NCR.'s with an "S" after the number, TUGC0 Startup shall also. be forwarded a copy upon , issuance. for infonnation. 3.1.6' Disposition The " Action Addressee" evaluates and dispositions the NCR, attaches supporting documentation, and forwards the NCR for QE review. t For those nonconforming items which Construction / Engineering desires to continue to process on a " risk removal" basis, authorization shall be requested in the NCR disposition. In order to receive this authorization to continue the process, the following conditions must be satisfied: ( The NCR disposition shall include sufficient informa-a. tion and direction for accomplishing the work. Detail shall be provided to permit adequate evaluation of potential impact to affected parties (i.e., construction, engineering, QA/QC, records, start-up and operations); b. Engineer Review / Approval shall be by the Discipline Group Supervisor or above; c. Quality Engineering Review / Approval shall be by the QA/QC Supervisors or above. Af ter approval of the disposition a Blue Temporary Waiver Tag, per Reference 1-A, shall be affixed to. the item. The NCR number shall be noted on the Temporary Waiver Tag. 3.1.7 Quality Engineering Review The NCR disposition shall be reviewed by Quality Engineering i; for adequacy and conformance to applicable specifications i and/or code requirements. If review is satisfactory the NCR Coordinator will have the 4 disposition entered on the original, obtain the required signatures, and enter the' date on the NCR log. If the

{

disposition is not satisfactory, the Quality Engineer shall resolve all comments with the Engineer who dispositioned the NCR. m coOA ponm 3 q i! _,,_.~_..________._. -

_1, - _ _... _ ii _ _Z,._ ...u u_ - 7 PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. !'( CP-QP-16.0 8 FEB 0 01983 5 of 7 Upon Quality Engineering approval of the disposition, and prior to beginning any rework /. repair, QC shall remove the red hold tag and blue waiver tag (if applicable). 3.1.8 Implementation of the Disposition For NCR's dispositioned as " Rework", " Repair" or " Scrap" a copy of the NCR shall be sent by the NCR Coordinator to the - respons.ible Construction / Operations Supervisor for implementation to correct the nonconforming condition. For NCR's dispositioned as " Rework" or " Repair" and identified with an "S" after the NCR number, an information i copy will also be sent to TUGC0 Startup. Construction will contact TUGC0 Startup for authorization in accordance i with Reference 1-B, to implement the disposition. 3.1.9 Verification / Closure l r The QC Discipline Supervisor shall ensure that the NCR ll ('. disposition work items are verified and/or witnessed by QC. QC shall document their inspections (via, inspection reports, checklists, travelers, etc. as' required. The QA/QC Supervisors, or their designee, shall sign the " Verification" block of the original NCR upon assuring that sufficient QC inspection documentation exits to support implementation of the disposition. The closed NCR will then be transmitted by the NCR Coordinator to the Permanent Plant Records Vault and the date entered.,in the NCR log. I t t k i i i ~ I TUCCO CA ,, g 3 s--- 'm - + + -t

m-,--a v--%-

---ye- -w,i---yg =w w +

y--y+nw

- - -my-w- - - - - -N-w--- -e r-

) ( ( ISSUE PROCEDURE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE I TEXAS UT!UTIES GENERATING CO. i CPSES~ ( CP-QP-16.0 8 FEB 0 31983 6 of 7 ATTACH. MENT 1 .-=-e-o COMAECHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION mgm NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) seNEAArme Co. l UNir sinuCiumE/sysTau sTguiCouPoNewt TAe/so NuueEn LOCATION OR ELEVATON RIA PC. p. ,1. L. MeNCOMPomuuso anomon l$ Ie E l e2P s 4 .(. f

  • g.'

_- Cid nEv. ,Aan mereneNCE ooeuwsNT-oA1 E-f neromTEo ev: OATE: QS REvtEW/ APPROVAL; I qq DEPARTMENT O ACTION ADORESSEE OsBPOg m ON. f4WOfut REPAsR USE AS IS 3CAAP \\ us i I v l DATE: ENEL REV1EW/ APPROVAL j 5 / I I OATE: j OE REVIEW APPmovat; I / / 1' DISPOSITION VEmeFICATIQN & CLOSURE: DATE: 1 .l COMMENTS: Porm NeL3 """N4NN-66P-N gw mm..g.,,

~ -. .( c ISSUE ' INSTRUCTION REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTluTIES GENERATING CO. / CPSES CP-QP-16.0 8' FEB 0 31983 7 of 7 ATTACHMENT 2 ,3 5 .F? I i i i i 1 s 1 i 5 I4 E!! l hl II l a h Dl ' I l l d y

{

a b5 a.: 33 se r Ej 3

  • I -[i i

8 i I l l#j 3 1 ) I $35 l t i si! i la! <15 e i ( i l I -TUGCO CA hm res 1 ~ e.,

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

  • TEXA8 UTILITIES GENERATIN2 CO.

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) UNIT STRUCTURE / SYSTEM ITEM / COMPONENT TAG /ID NUMBER LOCATION OR ELEVATION RIR NO. %Kif / 0/946 /E / hatfn Alde. QtM/dic Am' 38i&-63P6 A/e40. f&n'_ ____ _&_ NONCONFORMING CONDITION VN Ml".UUNU l 7 . -mw &aw as ine amp hte z;u Uk hamuf Jete-63r6 - n = Nj '(" Z SURELE N 8 ncR j Ac&: appy'. 2674"dwa&, sis 40, sinda ou awte w_g r y -wal, w n.e. izatelai i t, judah daiaawl butg. ARMS E (i>deth1a~gaglid 1NDEXED DATE: /~/70/ /E REFERENCE DOCUMENT

  • REV PARA REPORTED BY:

DATE: AlY Ef%Y1 V/N /$3 OE REVIEW / APPROVAL: DATE: w / / O ACTION ADDRESSEE DEPARTMENT DISPOSITION: REWORK REPAIR USE AS IS SCRAP / /199 (NLl2b All0/lb' $($ 4tt*1& Of7f/%0f lb/ftud'IEllu g a

  1. "#4 <Atratuv.

Isic-43rs. dt<a mio de l Et5 - 0%stt. Wefd /2eixo< & av h k qed j e---- gpura au e s // pp,/ i., / ,7;,y p,yn D; ENO.REV,EWiAP RO. I L1 11 W / 1 I OE REVIEW APPROVAL: DATE-O l DISPOSITION VERIFICATION & CLOSURE: V DATE: COMMENTS: g

== %l3f3 l 'I

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TEXAS UTILITIES dENERATING CO. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) ff./s (c2 ~ UNIT STRUCTURE / SYSTEM ITEM / COMPONENT TAG /lD NUMBER LOCATION OR ELEVATION RIR NO. ' ' * " " ' ^ * " FD-X-150-7eo-Recul19 8 77g 1 Aux /FD Ci.+sc 5 RPme E3sc NONCONFORMING CONDITION A I R c R A r r C a sue WAS fc uND l 0 OE C u r in HA L F. Y d HANMR WAS PRE & Jamrro he AcdWba Ey GC, E 8 5 Q. 5 Ol O N//[h CP-GP-/&.0 /c ,y, c -/ bio'5 IN (M REFERENCE DOCUMENT-REV PARA REPORTED BY: p DATE: 0 0 L A IM, tlltAAAV - _dN' M A /0 /19/ W-? ~ '3OE REVIEW / APP V .D DATE: W MM bOUM f0/hh w ~ C ACTION ADDRESSEE j DEPARTMENjT N ///./ W A./,/ & A L Z lk / WeAIEf. DISPOSITION: REWORK XXX REPAIR USE AS IS SCRAP M10N DHl.Y a b W. E. to issue mod. pk.,for craft to rework, to E 66 3 QA RECORD l0 i s 8 Q1 ob.de'5 /g j ' i M i e tV 6v m. . m, e 4'\\ o - K. I (g/n z 6f I n'E W- /4/ ( h Ilh [ SUBFILE NO. yoto nes-sasPI l i ARN3 _..en I' '\\ QQC.U. DATE: M,, Ad a m y _/ 10 /28/s 3 ENG. REVIEW /AP7 ROYAL OE REVIEW APPROVAL: DATE: NfO /0L.T/ / I] wO SPOSITION VERIFICATION & CLOSURE: DATE: / / n COMMENTS: l

=- ( ( [f.8#f*a wA3 TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC. OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM To Chuck Smanev Glen Rose, Texas November 30, 198'3 Subject COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PIPE SUPPORT STATUS (Void) ', Ref: CMC-90511 Rev. 1 Due to a re-route per the above refer'enced design change, the following support is no longer required and is to be voided. 35-1195 FD-X-150-700-E35C RECEIVED DEC 011983 ( UMENT CONTROL h Y (>w-sl GMC/JK/ C.fl. CHAMBERLAIN cc: Material Control D. Frankum K. Liford D. Westbrook R. Williams /D. Rencher f G. Bunt /J. Sherrer 8 g EXE0 R. Johnson R. Hay

04rg, R. Whitley C. Bhatt C. Moore R L 0 0."" S T.

PROJEC1 hM'.____ t l PPDJECT ENGR 1. I QA MGR. PROJECT CONT. OG{\\ TUCC0 QA i PROJECT GEN. ME ARMS } e CPPA- \\ ,-,._,.-e-_ _... -...... - -. -

7. i7. SIS RECORD FOR MONITORIN Q.A./Q..dR00 HAMS / o#36' i.

  • JN" Tite IIARTFol4D STEA.st D INSPECTI and INStJRANCE CO.\\tPC h '* '# ** * #* **- N'8 sun mmu.i:ussa ni:rr e.nu g

CASE E IBI , e ' ic on,eme ene r.nor wt ~ gagt

g lj Gordon Purdy, Site Q.

A. Manacer Octche. >1 1oqq 3 Ci.slCuta s (tiessar hast =.7 sAas.On .ns7 At;4m 04 feit.;N 0;bh3AT lea (G4Cuas ggg gagy; f Folics Up e g Brown is Root, Inc. I t: r., e.... w aecmree UC!cred E '"17tten gu'** - F: eld Repair / CPSES Glen Rose, Texas C5hc8 TAssemmy CArterinan Cinserwee I, the undersigned. have monitored your QA/QC manual on: 10/21/83 and find the fo!!owing sections: ~~ < ca<., n o..e no-we ene rmeno a satisfactory: treenery QasCC manuar ses: son (no. ene rette} Cn menery sne sneestne noneamermence en ansonssaees Unsatisfactory: Section 16 Non Conforming Items The following listed findings were found to be unsatisfactorv. See i.O..q attached sheet. s.i 7 Although specific examples are given, the orablems found are not 3 limited to just these examples. 3 COVER CUSTOMER: Pleare descaibe the resolution of these item

the " CUSTOMER'S RESOLUTION" section below and give i

date for completion of orrective action, so that items may be remonitored by: November 7, 1983 scares Please keep the Original of this form for your records and return a copy to inspector named below. l'!gmaur:cm g wt ma m2 sa in o==, !E_tes. utr/n;e$ g,,,;g, ,,,,,,10/21/83 h j nuaur.cn ce reicst irtus etsaisto asevi as ua.c i asaranc:an,,c.nna..n ae.e,.e s.ne.,gue,, _ O) C M, cuite oresenrauve f / ^ ]$ "7Tp l$U i I [. 5.i 4t5/- #/

4. I i

h _,,s c-Covra C - ~.. . art c:anic:nt acten wu at c:witrts cart sota soto rce e,,,es,e.en,,,, e, I k it, the undersigned, have remonitored the above unsatisfactory conditions on: iand found them: C Satisfactory UUnsatisfactory (Explain eeIQw) li I 0 ~ t i'*'**"'" $15 foreign l ass. "E Sua sota tass =s==# ,h ,I tet. Mar Aeoresentative File s Mk . - = = =.... y _ _.w=e--- - ~ + - ,W"

n. y,~.. ..a SIS Raport #366 Pega 2 of 3 3 (1) NCR's are being voided that should not be. Examples: M10,136 Rev. 1 - Should have been closed, M10,188 - This NCR references another NCR for justificacion when the two NCR's (and documents attached to them) do not deal with the same problem and/or area. M10,193 - No dbjective evidence given for justification. (2) 10 open NCR's were picked at random from the log books in f each task force area. Only 1 Task Force NCR Coordinator / could track the NCR's any further than through ANI review, and his tracking device was not the one prescribed by Brown & Root. (3) NCR's being presented to ANI's for review without having f the. referenced drawing's revision number. Examples: / M 6752S Rev. 1, M 7116S Rev. 1. M 6577S Rev. 1, M 6620 Rev.1, M 71195 Rev. 2, M 6756S Rev. 1, M6619 Rev. 1, M 6188S Rev. 1. (4) Trend categories for NCR's are inconsistent. Example: Some NCR's written for missing welds were trended C-ll or p/ C-12, while other NCR's written for the same reason were trended C-16. (5) NCR M 7169S Rev. 0 - Action Addressee was Finneran (Engineer-ing). The review by Engineering was not signed on Rev. O ~.., and the review blocks for Engineering had been NA'd on Rev. 1; therefore, the NCR had never been reviewed by the Action Add-ressee, making the disposition indeterminate. (6) NCR's being revised by organizations other than the organiza-tion that originally prepared them. Example: f-NCR 5803S Rev. 1 - Rev. O was written by Weld Engineering and was revised by the Action Addressee (Engineering). (7) Additional information being added to NCRs without being re-vised (added after initial reviews). Example: NCR M 11,0065. (8) NCR log books state NCR M 11,003 is void, but'no date was r' entered. (9) NCR log books do not give Action Addressee. Examples: p-M 11,029, M 10,050, M 10,056, and M 10,058. (10) MCR log books do not give trend category. Examples: y' M 11,029, M 9650, and M 11,441. u i L 4 w-m e

_ _.. _ _ _ ~ e '. / I ~ '* - SIS Rnport #366 Page 3 of 3 s (11) NCR log books state a NCR is closed when it was actually ,/~ voided. 4 (12) NCR's written in one Task Force area, r.nd entered on that log book, then transfered to another arei are not being ./ f tracked. Example: M 10,205 logged in Auxiliary Building Task Force, sent to Safeguard Task Force on 8-2-83, closed on 9-29-83 by Safe-guard Task Force, and log book in Auxiliary Building Task Force shows it to still be open. '(13) Inspection Reports issued after ANI acceptance of hanger packages. Example: v/ CC-1-SB-035B-006-3; CC-1-SB-035B-007-3; CH-1-A3-040-009-3; CH-1-AB-042-006-3. These were found during ANI re-review. (14) CP-QAP 11.1 and CP-QAP 16.1 are inadequate in giving Quality s/' Control personnel direction on what is permitted to be written up on,an Inspection Report and what must be written up on an NCR. Txample: AM 03097 written 10-7-83-is a clear procedural viol'ation, but hasybeen closed with an"NCR as of 10-20-83. n,r ~ (15) Trend Analysis is not being accomplished for Inspection- .f Reports. Reference CPSES Quarterly Report on Q. A. Depart-V ment and Q. A. Program Activities for the Third Quarter of 1983. (16) Trend categories given to Inspection Reports are very incon-sistent. Example: g C-16 is listed for missing welds, incomplete welds, welds needing NDE, undersized welds, slag in welds., etc., and 1 Inspection Report (AM-00027) is trended C-16 while the re-port has nothing to do with welds or welding. l (17) No objective evidence found that Q. C. Leads are reviewing Inspection Reports. Example: Safeguard Task Force. i a i .~. v

.-... : = =. - - - .=

  1. .dk30t.k1C.

INTEROFFI MEMO IM# 26,404 DATE: November 8, 1983 To: J.W. Lytle FROM: R. Siever

SUBJECT:

CPSES, 35-1195 SIS Report #366. 1. NCR 10,136 R.1 was void with justification. The above NCR was written against Sway Strut RH-1-002-013-C41R, Rev. 1. This strut was installed on Hanger CC-1-057-004-A33R, Rev. 4, which was documanced on NCR 10,794A. NCR 10.1935 s.as void with justification. Field wel'ds 2 & 3 are Eull fillet welds by application, not design and as such are not noncon-i. forming and do not need MI/PT evamination. NCR 10,188S and Ref. NCR 52125 R.2 do reference the same problem. NCR 10,1885 should not have been written on BRP-RC-1-RB-021 (piping). ll The nonconformance is on hanger lug for support RC-1-018-003-C515. Justification for voiding NCR 10,1885 vill be revised. 2. NCR Iag Books have been updated and Task Force NCR Coordinators reinstructed as to their proper use. 3. Quality personnel have been reinstructed to include revision number of drawings on NCR's. 4. Trending codes are subjective and interpretive, the codes you described in this Item C-11, component supports fabrication (incomplete / incorrect), C-12 component support installation (incomplete / incorrect), or C-16 component support welding could all be used for missing welds. Quality personnel have been reinstructed on a more consistant use of trend codes. 5. At the time this NCR (7169S R-1) was written, our procedure required Quality Engineering to disposition NCR's " Rework", without Engineering approval. 6. NCR 5803S Rev. I was prepared to corrtet the disposition of NCR 5803S Rev. O. This revision was prepated by the engineer that made an error on his description of the disposition. We find no evidence of a nonconforming condition being revised by other than the action / addressee. 7. Qus11ty personnel have been reinstructed. 8. Same as Item 7. d 9. This condition has been corrected and personnel reisstructed. l 10. Same as Item 9. it' L a 4 i l4 e-e,,, ,, g ,--,--y ,,.,.------,-,--------e,- -.,,-n.-.---._-.

==

:=
=:

=-. c.. =.. .-.a 5. Pag 3 2 of 2 i SIS Repcrt #366 i

11. When an NCR is void, it is closed per CP-QAP-16.1, Para. 3.1.1.4.
12. NCR 10,205 has been closed by Auxiliary Task Force on 9/29/83.

Currently in Safeguard Task Force for tracking.

13. As previously agreed to by Hartford Steam Boiler and B&R, any documentation that was generated after ANI review of a package would require the Attachment 1 to be void and the package resubmitted to ANI for review.
14. We do not feel CP-QAP-11.1 and CP-QAP-16.1 are ' inadequate. IR AM 03097 may result in an NCR, but this IR has not been answered as of 10/20/83.
15. An amend==nt to the Quarterly Report for the Third Quarter of 1983 was issued on November 1,198f for IR's.

All future Quarterly Reports will include an IR trend.

16. This is the same finding as Item 4.
17. There is no procedural requirement that QC Leads sign IR's to indicate their review.

We feel that most of the above items, if addressed during the Audit, would have been corrected to the, satisfaction of the Inspection Agency. We also request an exit meeting to discuss any future' findings identified during any of your monitoring actions. W Sdiver ~ QC Group Supervisor i RS/ba ec: G.R. Purdy J.T. Blixt i G.L. Morris, Jr. l-QA File D I I +. k W_

_.,____._-.J- ' * * - ' ) s:S RECORD FOR MONITORING QAdQ,C. PROGRAidS THE HARTFORD STEA.41 KOII.EH INSPECTION and INSCRANCE CO.%1PANY IIT N 8'l 4)MI). I:ON.% IICI'It'.L*r lan ges;; ?LC/ l ro,n.. w r.u.s l satt

; rett cs s!

4R 99_E.d.on Purdy $ i,g Q_,,Q,, A,_,_M3:10,g e,:* I l %e-m-ho - 7 1o.07-1 1 ] * : : srewca s csasean, name . =si seamen

ny.t;cs
s scaic c:6n a,

.taaceca46 vsa on6rs -v". Erown & Root, Inc l l'nousten l-relicw-Up l~'C18588 8 g ' w cia m g - tecui H - v- - i ma _ rieia aesairr - 8 CPSES Glen Rose, Texas b3h*8 'M' Assemely CAlterinen ' inservice l1. the undersigned nave monitored your QA/QC manual on: December 7. 8 3and find the following sections: .c.... a a n - r.<, -. satisfactory: This SIS report is issued to indicate satisfactory response e i to the Remonitorinc of SIS Recort

  • 366.

v os.ac -.a , neu (n r.e.} on m.m.or an. am.a >, .~e~me n.n .o umonar Unsatistactory: e I s 5 ::: NI e 3= COVER CUSTOMER: Please describe the resolution of theae items in the " CUSTOMER'S RESOL.UTION'* section below, and give date for completion of corrective action, so that items may be remonitored by: NA e o.<. o Please keep the Original of this form for your record. and return a copy to inspector named below. ~

ss niw nca onst me sacato s\\.ase ares

_,,a.s. mc hgggg,,,,,, Ob,,si. 6 r..un.. to_7_g3 ) n.,._ _ C ). .t:.nuno=

  • racsc.rtiss cucaseta aeovt as stiac m..sa.;ron, sc a, n,.s

.s n./ re / J O E' E5 Es G u. COVER i sa:t ansacn=t acros au et cowttrto esit scato s:catoic ,ea ,n.n, t h l the undersigned. have remonitored the above unsatisfactory conditions on: p o.a.o e a:1d found them: Satisfactory

t. 4 Unsatisfactory (Esplain cetow) a k.*' !

=5- ,$ U l =i t i ' as &#.uMom l n.s.uchgggp,,,g, r,,,,,g,gg, l east me D sete insa sase.oro,s nuv. . _ u. !$ DET tiilt asas .pa,, w w~*=* MM -, .g.. g

,e N SIS RECORD FOR MONITORING Q.A./Q.C. PROGRAMS '5 M THE HARTFORD STI.*A.n Bot!.ER INSPECTION and INST;RANCE COAtPANY HAM Il UNI), i:ONNI.CI'ICLT 96402 i

5366 io,.... e r.,e, i Cars is cs

( $~"} Gordon Purdy, Site Q. A. Manacer I ! mo l, Oc cha-71 1oci i o M" Ci.srcute s ::w, ant =aut esp 4AamGn e.n57 a(G.ca ca f;AEM C l.mrat i amf G3CNAL was omsr; l -f ollow.U p sE Brown & Root, Inc. ":C:osee tu~.e .-t eeviree L UU asnc:oi toc 41cm 8 C1h*8 '1' Assemoir CAtteration Claservice Field Repair / CPSES Glen Rose, Texas

1. the undersigned have monitored your QA/QC manual on: 10/21/83 and find the following sectioris:

..e...n... ,3atisf actory: i steened, QAt0C manuar seersen [.e, one resse) Gn seenne the seessene noneenroemenee.. noeveneret b unsatisfactory: r Section 16 Non Conforming Items The following listed findings were found to be unsatisfactorv. See 'i. attached sheet. 3E ' Although specific examples are g. 'en, the eroblems found are not 2 limited to just these examples. CovtR CUSTOMER: Please describe the resolution of these items in the " CUSTOMER'S RESOLUTION" section M and give date for completion of corrective action, so that items may be remonitored by: November 7, 1933 Please' keep the Original of this form for your rec:rds and return a cocy to inscector named below. scares iL'L'*'"0" stst rategn n inso. UL '*** at:wca e, r ass i:4 s ou:=.uo on.: u.o wsas.si.crea,,-- I )_. lu,e [ la c. u r/ represenutive .x. rire !10/21/83 ) (; ) r m _e.nno,a,eegese...,,, f See accached IM 26,404. dF ll f MV e COVER 488 00ml(Cf.vt aCICm mit 8( Come,t:Lo Cait sota 33CMO #C aeemes e Aee,esea 77 / November 9. 1983 Nov. 9, 1983 ) / y /

1. the undersigned, have remor tored the acove unsatisfactory conditio on:

11f11fg3 and found them: C $atisf actory $ Unsatisfactory (Esotana metows ',j See. Attached. l e 1 l

= =

i sis r.,e,. ins, ip -o n j bles. War teoresentative.X. File I11/11/83 ...n. e, f % /,,j ,L. _j / ns, n,,, y j a u-

c = z. w..

u...

^ . + a

i

(. DATE: November 11, 1983 TO: Gordon ourdy FROM: Jerrv W. Lytle

SUBJECT:

Resconse to IM9 26,404 i SIS Report #366 Response given, IMS 26,404 is acceptable except for the following items: (1) NCR 10,193S - Non conforming condition as written bv the originator states the fillet welds in cuestion. "are full fillets requiring MT/DT". Justification for voiding would be referenced to a crocedure. Code inter- .l pretation, etc.. not an evaluation by a Q.C. Lead. (6) The non conforming condition of Rev. O of NCR 58035 h was also changed by Rev. 1, not just the disposi, tion. (..l (13) Response as stated is correct; however, this resconse does not address the problem as stated - i.e., deficien-cies discovered after final accentance is a non conform-ing condition per Brown & Root G. A. Manual. (14) CD-CAD 11.1 gives direction to O.C. Inspector to write an Inspection Recort (unsat) on everything excect "N" stamped and final accepted items. This is in conflict with Brown & Roots Q. A. Manual, 16.4.1, which states (among other things) "a procedural violation shall be identified and documented on an NCR". (17) CP-OAP 11.1 - 2.2 states "q.C. Leads will review Inspection Recorts". Without their initials or some other device, there is no objective evidence of their review. Most, if not all, of the listed items were addressed to the involved'O.A. personnel in the field, as exemplified by item 2 of the report. Additionally, as stated on the original report. the problems extend bevond just these examples. 1 ,( i i s 1 (.- 4 'l "~

- ; m o e. INTEROFFIC 20 IM# 26,537 December 5, 1983 M. Coats, LANI FROM: J.T. Blixt

SUBJECT:

CPSES, 35-1195 Unsatisfactory Ramonitoring on SIS #366. Findina #1. "NCR 10,193S - Nonconforming conditions as written by the originator states the fillet welds in question "are full fillets requiring MT/PT". Justifica-tion for voiding would be referenced to a procedura, code interpretation, etc., not an evaluation by a QC Land". Requirement: QAM 16.4.4 Voidian an NCR ".... he shAll provide justification for such a disposition on the NCR, and shall sign for closure". Requirement: CP-QAP-16.1, Rev. 20, Para. 3.1.1.4 Voiding an NCR - "....he shall provide justification for such a disposition on the NCR and shall sign for closure....". B&R disagrees with the inspector's statement that " Justification for voiding would be referenced to a procedure, code interpretation, etc., not an evaluation by a QC Lead". In fact, if B&R did comply with the inspector's it wo ld be in non-compliance with QA Manual Section 16.4.4 which

request, u

inpart states "The QE, cognizanc supervisor or higher authority may, during processina, disposition an NCR to. state "Not a conconforming condition" or similar wording. He "shall provide _iustification for sud a disposition on the NCR and shall sign for closure:. Further, as requireu ~y the " Document Violated" QE-QAP-11.1-28, Rev. 22, Para. 4.4.1.1 (ref. "Not.:enforming Condition" entry NCR #10,1935), "QCI shall evaluate all Class 1 fillet welds to determine if they are full fillet welds", and per the reply to Brown & Root's ASME code require #N183-092, the QCE's justification that "Not designed full fillets" is a valid evaluation of the code and procedure requirements. Thus, unless the inspector can provide additional references, there appears to be no valid committments to substantiate the inspectors concern. Since all of the'ANI's " specific examples" of NCK's being voided that should not be", were correctly voided, B&R feels that NCR's are being processed in compliance with QA program requirements, but to alleviate any further concerns, the B&R Site QA Manager has by IM dated November 17, 1983, restricted the voiding of NCR's to the QC/QE supervisors and the Site Level III's. 1 o c - w g.e m ,9-1 sg

,r

---er g +y---t--- y9,or+fy y--w,y-y f-- g ye e ,mee-------.- w -+--,We--irw --%-w---.- us---m'-

s. ANI Finding #6. "NCR's being revised by organizations other than the organization that erginally prepared them". Example: NCR 5803S, Rev. 1 - Rev. O was written by Welding Engineering and revised by the action / addressee (Engineering). 4. Requirements: QAM 16.4.1 "NCR revisions shall be initiated by the same organization that performed the original preparation providing they have signature authority. NCR revisions shall receive the same review and approval cycle as the original NCR". CP-QAP-16.1, Rev. 19 Para. 3.1.5.1 "....NCR revisions can be initiated by QE/QC, ANI or Engineering providing they have signature authority. NCR revision shall receive the same review and approval cycle as the original NCR". B&R Response Finding #6. "NCR 58035 revision was prepared to correct the disposition of NCR 58035, i Rev. O. This revision was prepared by the engineer that made an error on 1. his description of the disposition. We find no evidence of a nonconforming i-condition being revised by other than the action / addressee. ANI Response Findinz #6. The nonconforming condition of Rev. 0.of NCR 5803S was also changed by Rev. ' 1, not just the disposition. The NCR #M5803S, Rev. 1 was submitted to the individual who reported the nonconformance for concurrence with the correction made to the condition description. That individual signed the revision indicating his concurrence. ANI Findinz #13. " Inspection Reports issued af ter ANI acceptance of hanger packages. Example: CC-1-SB-0355-006-3 CC-1-SB-0355-007-3 CE-1-AB-040-009-3 CH-1-AB-042-006-3 These were found during ANI re-review". Requirements: QAM Section 16.3.1: "The final acceptance of supports shall be performed by QC per a Vendor Certified Drawing / Design Review Drawing i. (VCD/DRD) valkdown, including document review, in accordance with site procedures. The final acceptance of the piping system shall be performed on an N-5 valkdown, including document review, in the same manner. CP-QAP-16.1, Rev. 19, Para. 3.2.2.2, Nonconformances - When a deficiency which can not be resolved by an unsat IR or any deficiency related to an N-Stssped component or any deficiency which is identified af ter final acceptance of piping system or support in accordance with Reference 1-E (CP-QAP-12.1) (i.e., Hydro Release or VCD/DRD walkdown including document review), shall be reported on an NCR in accordance with this procedure.... CP-QAP-11.1, Rev. 3, Para. 2.3.2 of Attachment 1 - Same as above. !i -v ym mv. ~ ww w 1.

L.:

:.:. = = =.

= - '^~ ~ ^ -~ ,. e i i Brown & Root Response. The inspection reports addressed in this SIS report were written during August and September. During this time frame, there was no QAM requirement that adequately addressed final acceptance and the initiation of an NCR for this condition. In October (10/10/83) the B&R QAM Section 16, Para. 16.3.1 was revised to clarify this item. Therefore it is felt that the IR's were correctly implemented and that NCR's were not required. QCI's have received documented classroom training on this subject and are fully aware of this B&R QAM requirement. I ANI Finding #14. CP-QAP-11.1 gives direction to QC inspector to write an Inspection Report (unsat) on everything except "N" stamped and final accepted items. This is in conflict with B&R QA Manual,16.4.1 which states (among other things) "A procedual violation shall be identified and documented on an NCR". B&R Response. of CP-QAP-11.1, Para. 1.0, NOTE: was written to clarify IR's and direcc reference to Para. 2.3.2 which identifys NCR's. In CP-QAP-16.1, Para. 2.2.1 and 2.2.3 will clarify this inspectors concern. ANI Tindins #17. CP-QAP-11.1, Para. 2.2 states "QC Leads will review Inspection Reports", without their initials or some other device, there is no objective evidence of their review. B&R Response. li 1. CP-QAP-11.1, Attachment 1, Para. 2.2. requires in part, that: The QCI shall obtain the serial number for an IR from the QC Lead. Prior to assigning the IR number, the QC Lead shall review the IR..... 2. C.R. Purdy's IM#26,019 additionally requires that, "at the time of assigning the serial number...., the responsible QC Lead shall also assign the applicable deficiency trend code... and document the trend code in the comments section of the IR log". Therefore the objective evidence of the QCL's review was the IR number itself on the IR and the trend code indicated in the log and on the IR l itself. But to help porvide the " objective evidence" requested by the inspector, the QC Leads have received additional instruction to initial the trend code in the IR comments section. } 4 e 'l 4 e -.-,, -4.-~..-m-m ,4 e 4+-n ,, -.. - + +---,,.m, s.--

e. It is felt by B&R QA Management that with better communications between ANI and B&R QA personnel, the type of concerns addressed in this SIS Report would have been corrected or resolved prior to the initiation of many reports. Should you have any questions in regards to this response, please contact as at extension 459. >3 ( J.T. Blixt QE Group Supervisor JT3/be cc G.R. Purdy R. Siever G.L. Morris, Jr. p., .,= e S iI s S ~, I% '.e i 9 e v - erymp,- - - Mw

BRCWN & ROOT, INC. 0A RECORD Quality Assurance Departnent NCR N0 b N Nonconfonnance Report (NCR) CPSES-35-1195 PAGE / OF 8

W 'NG/ IDENTIFICATION TAG /ID NUM3ER LOCATION OR ELEVATION RIR NO.I er / 09/ 00/ 892 2

%V RJ / G l'0 7 0 !NONCONCRMINGCONDITION N# Y#

  1. I-I j

TREND j 00CUMENT VIOLATED: //- /-39 REY. 2/ PARA. 8 2 CATEGORY d-/7 h;WDC A o 3 3 z. we eds or w.s Done pes a s,dapc a ss h ey o l fo S 7'o r.r s o.sve s ./ QA RECORD o SC C. CCf y Cf W QC Rm u Rww , t.,["* /f ## w we-t /= ~ a, & a e c. ARMS INDEXED SUBFILE NO j i Meto rn, s y,*l.s e.o DATEe 'h LYR'S y.'j. o l "' 9 "j# M o^7E:

f. f.,.,

g /,.....-: AOME55di 'h' STAMP- .1P0NEhi CAR NO.: ASM C005 ITEM: Barsa. ics no s 41 / tes no ... f- ;.. T i ON : A.-?fERA / S-REPAIR AS IS 0-SCPAP E-RETUR'i TO VENDCR 054T10 o> vorr m t om >d w w wa D a.+L a.x,JkLa t"L .w.as.-.. .s .s. e. -q 9 '- .h AAS 's9-CY74. G1) Ae-d A'U= f VT p % ~ //S / 047.2. (1) Al -- -: sicR Mt i ) s f festc, ou fff A-0172 / o o AHdd W.r/Af3 EhG. Ridliw/AFPROVAL: 0 ATE: l ' RE 'EW: DA E: A so e-s-r3 i 7-2/-B TUGC0/QA RE m W/ APPROVAL: DATE: 11 EV EW: DATE:. l A /A G D 7* S fi /7-21-9'1 l 0 ~1CA Ch: CATE: Pyhi!Au.TRi?OTA5Li res V NG I M i0.?V-n~% / / ~ DAin INITIAL /DATE: /0/ M /d ANi C ' " ~ 't 3 e- /o 2 4/ b lME5ilNGn005E C0t4CURRENCE: 2m

(

/b/en.3 h A 7 -$~-f f / s r 1 f [L gy. a - o +.z m +=ou - -. ~,,.. - --=,-.--. --. 4 + -. -

~ -{ [ 0$h _ ~ INS"'Al.t.ATION 70 SE IN WCC Serial No. [-d 3 N _ ACCO8tDANCE WITWPROCEDURES RD AIR PRC N $NEIT Drawing No. ##/-##/-te/-//// REFERENCED IN.- CPM 6.11 Weid No. /# /,/ DESCRIPTION OF DUICT (!XETCi) w t' s-r:t-Ws/S /- l /smsn' ww Losas no Musy3 Mem Jeiik.o fa rwicW l sd. 2 4 WD .//. 3 i l I HOLr) POINTT

  • $a LN5r W LUN m uLi3 (5IGli AND CATE$

DPtit. OPDATION WT QC, ML COM or QC or WT tiGE cz.ii ML NO. afa Lf'iEL // Asaffit /s/A'W l' ( i;. A &nwo 14 MA #A I 8 &as AA v W4-d

//t~s m D

'1A V ^/ '- 1 l n A M.44 W DA /, a c-l s IsiaAc sr-ib f twV l l / & is ai. MC sL/ dede -fLD u) -i l ll l l fnn l ll 1 l 1 ,i ' ' ' /Ac,.. I I I I ' ugh,. l l l I '!/LW l I ' offl u l l l l l l 1 I I I I l l l 1 -l l l l l .I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I l i I I I I l e 2 K OC ^ ' ANT G4H u en,,- n . ii - i.. 1 R u ?" T'L,'""."us, =... = l! as msg aannic m a.( (-

/- -g, BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 g g g iagt 1 of 20 CP-Q AP-12.1 10 TIT 1.E: ORIGINATOR:( Ark Gr) or 1 ir.;g/q DATE INSPECTION CRITERIA [ AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWED BY: /'N

w...

- /.1/f rj REQUIREMENTS PRIOR v" JOATE [ M 8 R CAT ON APPROVED BY: Site QA Manager F DATE '

1.0 REFERENCES

1-A QI-QAP-2.1-5, " Training and Certi fication of Mechanical Inspection Personnel" -f QI- -11.1-28, " Fabrication, Installation Inspection of g kA Component Supports, Class 1, 2, and 3" -C CP-QAP-16.1, " Control of Nonconfonning Items" f f CP-QAP-12.3, " Testing Phase Quality Assurance Functions ( j' I Prior to ASME Code Certification and Stamping" g/ CP-QAP-12.2, " Inspection Procedure and Acceptanc for ASME Pressure Testing" Q AP-11.1-26, "ASME Pipe Fabrication and Installation /}/ pections" 6 d 1-G QI-QAP-11.1-39, " Mechanical Equipment Installation Inspection" b)T hg / CP-QAP-11.1, " Fabrication and Installation Inspection of { [ Components, Component Supports, and Piping" d' GENERM. ) /2 i! PURPOSE 1 f The punose of this procedure is to establish requirenents j for a system / subsystem walkdown and verification by the () )/g Quality Control (QC) Group prior to: f' a. Pressure testing b. Release for penetration sealing ,4 1 F01A 9 roRINFORMATION ONLY U VkLL 1 ry / r 9 -

=- . - _ = = ~ 7_ BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-QAP-12.1 10 2 or 20 g.4 81983 c. Verification that piping hangers comply with vendor certified drawings (large bore) or design reviewed drawings (small bore). d. Release for preparation on N-5 Data Report. 2.2 SCOPE The scope of this procedure applies to all ASME Section III piping and components. 2.3 RESPONSIBILITY The QC Group Supervisor shall be responsible fo the overall implementation of this procedure. All inspection personnel perfonning inspections required by this procedure shall be trained, qualified and certified in accordance with Reference 1-A. The QA/QC Building Supervisor shall be responsible for assuring that design drawing's (i.e, BRP's, VCD 's, DRD, etc.) used to perform system / subsystem walkdown per Paragraph 2.1 shall be the current revision. The frozen or N-5 copy of the BRP shall be used for all hydro's. The QC Inspector shall document the drawing, revision number and all CMC's that have not been incorporated into the drawing on the applicable QC checklist. 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PRE-PRESSURE TEST WALK 00WN The pre-pressure test walkdown status of the piping system / subsystem shall be performed using the "QC Pre-pressure Test Checklist" (Attachment 1), and BRP drawing and any CMC's that have not been incorporated into the latest drawings. Valves, pumps, component supports and vessels shall have thei r identification / serial number recorded l on the walkdown BRP. 3.2 RELEASE FOR PENETRATION SEALING The Area Management Penetrations Seals Supervi sor shall notify QC Systems Superintendent of piping penetratio.ns they .j want released for sealing.

l BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE 4 CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-QAP-12.1 10 DEC 2 8 lor 3 3 or 20 The QC Systems Lead shall verify the penetration meets the following acceptance requirements: a. All welds inside penetrations are completed, pressure tested and acceptable. i b. No base material defects. c. Free of foreign material. 4 d. Hangers and pemanent attachments required are installed. e. Pipe clearance and gradient. i' The QC Group will notify Area Management of penetrations acceptable for sealing. Prior to releasing a penetration for sealing, the Penetration Seal Release Fonn (Attachment 2) shall be completed and submitted to the ANI for his. concurrence. Completed Penetration Seal Release Forms shall be forwarded to Area Management. 3.3 COMPONENT SUPPORT DESIGN VERIFICATION I The QC Leads shall be responsible for perfonning an inspection of all ASME cnmponent supports to verify they are 4 in compliance with the vendor certified (Large Bore) or design reviewed (Small Bore) drawings. i : Inspections of component supports shall be perfomed using ~; the "QC Component Support Checklist" (Attachment 5). Any weld on component supports that are not required by the vendor or design reviewed drawing shall be inspected in l' accordance with the requirements of Reference 1-B. Actual weld sizes shall be documented ~on the vendor certified or design review drawings, if they-have not been documented on Attachment 13 of Reference 1-B. Unsatisfactory items l shall be documented in accordance with Reference 1-C/1-H. 1 ) 3.3.1 The physical measurement of structural welds shall be conducted in accordance with the following guidelines: a. On supports where welds have been mapped on Attachment 13 of Reference 1-B, remeasurement of the welds is not I l ? l - =- l [ w --e .w..-,, -.-,-+,-3%g- -m y4-+ -., m ei- -e-e m ,-.,_4v - - - - - - - + -,,, -,. ,,,._.,,,-7, ,,,,,,.,_y. ,-y w,--,.pme---p.---,-------,,,,,*,-9,7 y ,r+--- - - - - - -

. m: .: '.. _'. :- ' = a - = = = - = BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE 4 J08 35-1195 CP-QAP-12.1 10 DEC 281983 4 or 20 f-i required unless the weld visually indicates contour 4 l modification that indicates a reduction of the weld size, or the weld size is changed by a starred (*) revision to the VCD/DRD; b. On supports where welds have not been mapped on Attachment 13 of Reference 1-B, remeasurement of i accessible welds shall be perfonned due to weld contour modi fication, to assure compliance to the j VCD/DRD. 3.3.2 Pipe to support clearances are established by Engineering to provide adequate support for the piping, while permitting expected growth or movement due to the operating environment. 3 Clearances indicated on a VCD/DRD are construction. j installation clearances and do not require rameasurement after clearances are verified on process control documents, j unless; l a. The support configuration is modified by design. change, ~ b. The support is being reinstalled following removal to I i accomplish a design change or other constuction, or c. Directed by Engineering. d. Visual examination indicates the sum of the clearances have not changed after verification at time of installation. l-3.3.3 Initial load or travel settings are established by Engineering to provide adequate support for the piping, while pemitting expected growth or movement due to the operating i environment. Load or travel settings indicated on a VCD/DRD are construction installation clearances and do not require l remeasurement after settings are verified on process control 1-doctments or QA checklists, unless: i a. The support configuration is modified by design change, j. or directed by Engineering. it I 3.4 N-5 WALKDOWN Ij The final status walkdown to verify completion of the system / sub-system shall be performed using the "QC N-5 Checklist" (Attachment 3). - --.2--...------.J-

~ BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-QAP-12.1 10 5 f 20 )EC 281983 The QCE shall be responsible for assuring that all component supports are installed in compliance with the VCD/0RO and i the support package has been transmitted to the PPRV. The piping / equipment Task Force QCE shall be responsible for verifying all operations on the "QC N-5 Checkli st" (Attachment 3) have been inspected and are acceptable. 3.5 SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM DOCUMENTATION All items defined on the "QC Checklist" as unsatisfactory shall be doctmented on the "QC Deficiency List" (Attachment

4) and entered on the Master Data Base Input Fonn (Attachment 61 The Master Data Base Input Form shall be transmitted to Project Management for input into the Master Data Base.

3.5.1 The QA/QC Building Supervi sor shall verify that all deficiencies have been resolved prior to N-5 certfication of the system / subsystem. 3.5.2 A system or portion of a system shall not be considered completed until Quality Assurance has verified through the above mentioned QC walkdown and QE Systems doctnentation review that all pennanent piping, valves, pumps, vessels and hangers are complete and intact and have been installed in accordance with current design documentation (i.e., BRP drawings, VCD/ORD, CMC's, etc.). Also the pressure test shall have been completed and accepted by the ANI and the Owner in accordance with Reference 1-E. 3.6 REPORTING DEFICIENCIES /NONCONFORMANCES 3.6.1 INPROCESS Deficiencies /Non-Confonnances shall be reported and documented in accordance with References 1-C/1-H. I Base material defects and arc strikes shall be identified and resolved per Reference 1-C, in addition to being recorded on the "QC Deficiency List". t t t l =_ M ,m +

~ ~ ~." - - -- BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 6 or 20 CP-QAP-12.1 10 DEC 281983 3.6.2 Nonconfomances Identified After ISO has had an N-5 Data Report Completed The QA/QC Building Supervi sor shall be responsible for maintaining a log of all. IS0's that have had a completed l 150 N-5 Data Report signed off by the ANI. I This log shall be distributed to the QCE's repsonsible for controlling the issuance of NCR numbers. The NCR QC Engineer shall assure that any NCR generated on ISO's that appear on the N-5 ISO log are identified per reference 1-C and a copy sent to the responsible QA/QC Building Supervisor. The QA/QC Building Supervisor shall void, as applicable, the completed ISO N-5 Data Report and i assure the nonconfonning condition is corrected. When the NCR is closed, he shall prepare an amended N-5 Data Report, when applicable and resubmit the N-5 package to the ANI for his review and signature. fi l l e

n

.. 'ZJ __u

AGL-3 c/M--3l BROWN & ROOT, INC. cA RECOR. Cuality Assurance Depar::.en: SCE N'. ?:- G ~ Scncenfor:ance Report (N CF. ) C?SES-35-1195 FAGE 1 CF 13 DRAWING / IDENTIFICATION (REV) TAG /ID NUh5ER LOCATICN OR ELEVAT!CN RIR NO. d6-2-46-/CO /f-SEE BELOW M 9/O N/A !::et: CON 70px!Nc CONDITIcN SUISYSTEM M Jes-2 ROCM NO. /94[262' l DOCUMENT VI0I.ATED: MS-100 REV. 5 PARA.4.4.1 ORY M-4 I l All PDRF's for d5-2-AS-/co have been placed on this NCR for closure, with cross reference of NCR number addressed on NCR M-3058. 1 i Al6-W/2. - 292. ..,L Nif ~ 0076 - Sq 2, l ggS l R-l / _so """"" "%/uaKKp ^=512"%A i.icM ct^ = =' ACTION ADDRESSEE 'N' STAMPED ITEM NISJ2 REGUIRED ASME CODE ITEM: YES X NO YES X NO X TES NC Moehlman [DISPOSI!!ON: 1 A-REWORK B-REPAIR C-USE AS IS X D-SCRAP E-RETURN TO VCIDOR 1 I i THE PROJECT MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING GROUP / FIELD MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION WILL NOTIFY Q.E. IN WRITING AS FINAL i CODE STRESS ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED AND ACCEPTED. i QA RECORD I e l RTN. QA REVIEW L DIMM FOR INFORMATION ONLY ""8/ I SUSFILE NO. l M-/O M Y l -x A & n,,u oc a ss 1 l -bl/b l-& Y- ' "'% RTM'l-z</-WV ^"'dZ"'TM*7 0 1%

    • tTD'7ttab i--zWrd

%H M W 1 Ni#s a '""=' ^"' ^" U "F " "f M EL "MDF)f/"Pf##v i !"cDiFfi^hd i-zf4V F01A-6b-w gg

-n / ' r/ r~ PIPING DEVIATION RECOF.D FORM /.- 1~ Nonconformance Report M l Attachment No. /*' 0*- 7/ N. [;7 /. Line No. / M-I- << 77-W//-Z T/O No. 2 - 970 b ,l BRP C A8- /00 I Stress Prob-MA Safety Related [ Non-Safety Related h 1. Gradient tolerance deviation Degree of Deviation spool no., component no., or other descriptione Use-as-is Rework to comply with design tolerance 2. Centerline tolerance deviation Degree of Deviation spool no., component no.. or other descriptions Use-as is O Rewo,k to compiy with design toie,ance 3. Sleeve centerline tolerance deviation MA/wom h 4 044:F" Degree of Deviation Pipe Spool No-Wal\\lReerm A/A 20 '- /k s / PA Use as-is VdkJ R4 Rework to comply with design tolerance f,.oo ga (./ Enr1~ 4. Clearance deviation spool no. component no., or other descr6ption is from distance spool no.. component no., other description a, location (elevation & coordensteel FOR INFORMATION ONLY u - -i-Rework to comply with design tolerance L / Dispositioned byt [ M-w .,,,,,-,h ,d-M M tsgnaturel properor neviewer Date i. Design Review !I Mech. ik Final Approval Signature idequired for Safety Rotated Deviation tor 1 & 2 only) Date

t. White OA' File 2. Green F.P.E. 3. Canary. Pipe Supp. Eng'. 4. Pink Tech. Services 5. Golden R D.. Construction

-,- - - n..,. . ~. _. .s-.-

r I.~. '1" PiriNG DE.VIATION RECORD FORT.', '1' Attachment No. /1 D kif_ Nonconf ormance Report M-f BRP. G A& lootine no.} 5 2 -6D-oIP-2io no. G-M O ) $-yt. Stress Prob-E/ C Safety Related Non-Safety Related ] f / A //A l 1. Gradient tolerance deviation Degree of Deviation epool no., component no., or other descriptione Use-as-is O Rewo,k to compiy witn design toie,ance g ggggg gg

2. g Centerline tolerance deviation Degree of Deviation M

epool no., component no.. or other des o Use-as is 3 f Rework to comply with design tolerance M 0 A stl f(d* " 'f'&c49

3. g Sleeve centerline tolerance deviation Degree of Deviation Pipe Spool No.

Wall / Floor hff fk/CACY Use-as-is Rework to compiy with design tolerance S hw.'. o.v is Mct b )ft $Er dwrev N1 C/ 4. Clearance deviation Dot -// // Spool no.. com nt no., or other description s b /O l k., comYo nont,no 2fo NIEP O -7 8 A - b d is IN from i b'l,odoolno dietence NWA S~0gherdes ption / an d 'L G L S19W's IV ' ' location 168evation & coord6neteel J"Cf. Q.87f -2Sdid-Q N ~ l h5.2.-677 -/y/g-2. o Use-as-is Rework to com ith design tolerance fg" j Dispositioned by! "b kSig ) Properor Reviewer Date lj Mech. Design Review _ l' Final Approval signature (Required for Safety Related Deviation for 1 & 2 only) Date /

1. White. QA!Fue 2. Green. F P.E. 3 Canary. Pipe Supp Engr. 4. Pink Tech Services $. Golden R D. Construction

., e ?- ,,...m.',.,.n,,,_7..._-,,_,,

In :-"ll - di TEX.W. UTILITIES SERVICES INC. O FFICE M E M O R A!;D U M R.C. Toison Glen Rose. Tex.u December 12, 1933 ro i Sutiect COMANrW PW M*m M M'Tc 97tTW? PIPING DEVIATION RECORD FORM Attachac.2t (1) lists several attachments to the referenced NCR. These have been reviewed against applicable final stress analysis and found to be acceptable. Per paragraph 3.6.2 of CP-EI-16.1-1, these items shall be considered closed. Q.A. log needs to be revised accordingly. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Sailesh Lakdavala; ext. 510. k m fG//I-C.R. SMA5tY / CRS/PC/SCec Project Pipe Support Engineer / attachments c'c ARMS D FOR INFORMATl0N OND i 'l I i o

      • "'N*n-

_D++ pesd - "r. mew _p, __g

m m.. %--k } Cu:11cy Assurance Depart::en:::CR 30. M-_ \\ \\ b'k$ QA RECORD Nonecutorsance Repur: (NC't) p% f, f oF C?SES-35-L195 PACE DRAVING/IDENTIFICAIION (RIV) \\G I NUMBg I.0 CATION OR EI.IVATION RIA No. C M-l-S R. C A 4' b sh/ c H - r-411 A NA NA NONCONTORMINC CCNDITICN SUBSYSTDi /CH4 RCCM NO. /V4 DOCUME'TT VTOIATO: C_ P.QA O / @ 7 REY. / PA'!A. 3 /. / b bORY M M /., N-5 BArA Acft4T S/N 4'73A wAs FisvAc.each cW J-7-@#^' Howe VG, 'r H e FLnc. W va C.P s i~ce PL w cc.S Ot3, Wh ( /Y\\P 2 I - O G,G 7 8 - 3/c0 ( /hP 6/ -JG 39A-3/oO), HA 0 /YOT-hem F, n A<_. Re vie.uc.b 8 A/N E r Scry'r' D THE 3 PPw Pei<* n A cewwves or i 8e nsDm Re Pot r. NCIFE J bcv riNc rhATcAi% c.cRT'iFid orN IN -5 DAT A kEbdT NAS k M dCmor/CD A I 3-/.3-G 3 fe3h ACTIONgD102SEE 'N'ST.\\MPE/ITy! I NIS-2 REQUIXED ASME CCDE ITDt: {.Qfy TES I ' 1.IC TES Jo L *TES no 'DISPOSITICN/ V A-RDORK 3-REPAIR C-USE AS IS Y D-3 CRAP E-iL..;rd TO VCfDoR Oue to addition of new bolting material Ref, this NCR on traveler, l-process flange traveler $ to ANI for review. Upon acceptance by ANI, transmittravelerIoPPRVandamendN-5DataReport. l t QA RECORD' See attached for corrective action. F ARMS 3,"y g am DMD j rii.c no. ^ / S. / SUDFILE NO.

  • ^ ' ' '

MeR-A-H&7 L f\\

    • MW' M **

fNJ

  • ^9W 3 dW' lCCh5T.

1 % 0{\\% f! - +,R d8 t-/f *7/ 1 OA !' ANI RET 'E'J/ ' NCURACICE : cafe: "/IC ROVAL: ) NMM N64-Nk"N' dM ' "^ l A:rt ' oA Ej, wEsTInCacustgC4Ct.{ AI 1 PS2ED'"W/a/ VAWry o 1.D v \\ 'M NP W.;,4

&tCA.- #2Reaihrtht--w.

i- ~ ~

ll g * / go O a W&rv For the non-conformances reported on NCR's 11652N thru 11687N,11697N, 11695N and 11698N, the following steps have been taken to preven. this problem from re-occuring:

1) The 1-5 Group will be utilizing the attached N-5 checklist, which will be completed prior to submitting the N-5 Data Report to ANI for review.
2) The N-5 and Document Review Groups have been consolidated into one generalized area.
3) All documentation in QES area.will be filed with N-5 status packages.

Any documentation that has not been ANI final reviewed will be sent to ANI with N-5 Data Report. x ? , = 'G.M. BeWhetzen [ y-GMB/bg FOR INFORMATION ON e I i l i M o 1 k l '.6 -d - 7 (o.- +,b d i 3 i e 5.,,th t, 3 v.) $ ? I [- J hWoh 'N4 2{. {'N]_I].I. M3y {..' T--{-3$ y 4-N

llLii[/b BRP NO. s J '. ap m N6/ N-5 CHECKLIST Check for open NCR's Ched for documents at QES Check for latest flange traveler and for s/n if applicable. Check line list for accuracy Check for Attachment 3 Check for base metal repairs If BMR are present make sure that they are shown on IS0's in hydro pkg. Make sure hydro is complete Make sure HITS printout matches BRHL and/or GHH Make sure weld attachments are shown on Hydro 150 in vault If thereare threaded connections shown on ISO, list threaded IR number '( Check welding engineering printout for outstanding documents Check data reports (NPV-1, N1, N1A etc.) for completeness and accuracy (sign-offs, pressure and temperature). 4, 1 FOR INFDMATION ONU o j ljJ .t

e l

li 't 5 i ' s i d ,I .'-.m.e....-.,~. ,.,...s.r._.... .:.mn.:,._..-_...--..

m. ._....2. J0dy Yd/ Y s ..c ~ ~~ Brownf5 Root.Inc. INSPECTION REPORT \\'O i PAGE e. t we m erpied o-i 4asA a a e i s i e a e s e a a e a a e e i t ig 1 i e a a a n . a a e a a a e t a a t I a PLANT SYSTEM COMPONENT TAG /SPtNitOENT NO. I OR AmNG/ SPECIFIC ATION NO. I SF Rf AL NO CCOE CODE CODE A l 8iCl 0i El F l ' G ; tun.us i H, EUntel l J; a ungel i. it.i. ii. ......t ... i t .3 t PURCH ASE ORDER VENO NUMOER CODE .s.. 1sn e ib a a a a e a e e I f e e e e e i t t t t I I t t t t i 1 t t I t i 1 e f t t a t t t t t t 2 MRR RIR VENDOR *S COUNT l UNsT5 PURCM'S RLS/ HOLO NO.lCOOE INPUT NUMSER NUMSER ME AT/ LOT /sATCH NO. Q U AN TI T y OR NO. ST ATus DATE 74.re enes esos ss ios tos.t i s _ i2 12 iz2.i27 E IIMb Nb b PURPOSE AND TYPE OF INSPECTION / SURVEILLANCE: I e e AOPR &E. MW RESULTS OF INSPECTION /SURVEbLANCE:A.6eer To PFW.45 DATA i RedsEvJs:h Bf ~ G Po er 4 (J d t -4:B A 146-GEED kMEMDE.D. MCR 6 0:ACW PbR < r twrRE. 1 1 4 9 _ - - waere 4 5 3 8 ran IN Em3MMiHiM th4U IUn un vama"-~ - i l. I} I I 3 } l, 2 I r In (J r l i 1wed JULm A-AA NcR No QC ENGINEER /INSPEC R DATE I CA-15.1/1-0(4-1 77) _-= - - _ l --. A * %*4emmesenrag**3;;*,,1gt? ** s+.24.- -=== ~

  • rc --.e-g,ga

.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211K042&oldid=5482116"