ML20211J615
| ML20211J615 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/05/1983 |
| From: | Scott B BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211J491 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 DCP-3, NUDOCS 8606260449 | |
| Download: ML20211J615 (52) | |
Text
.
- ,5d. fr.oub'A O' s
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
\\
~
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 1 of 8 TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
.. h d,
m/, /-#45 REVIEWED BY:
M f
0 83 01g UGC0 4A j D TE 8I APPROVED BY gr f
LNN UCTION' 0 JECT MANAGER
/DATE o.i TABLE OF CONTENTS k
1.0 REFERENCES
h{[
2.0 INTRODUCTION
i r
2.1 PURPOSE j
2.2 SCOPE p
3.0 PRQCEDURE T
3.1 REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION 3.1.1 Scoce of Controlled Documents 3.1.2 Controll ed Dist_ribution 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.4 Soecial Distributton
[
3.2 RsCEIPT AND ACCOUNTI FOR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS 3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Documents 3.2.2 Accounting for Controlles_Dpcuments 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE rd DOCUMENTS k[
3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents
%b 3.3.2 Storage of Documents 3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCUREMENT OR HYDRO PACKAGES 4.0 ATTACHMENTS No. 1 Design Change Log i
No. 2 Document Disposition No. 3 Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet i
No. 4 Controlled Distributuion Request No. 5 Document Distributuion Log
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manual 1.2 35-1195-CP-CPM 6.3 1.3 35-1195-DEI-9 e606260449 e60617 O
I 1.4 TUQ-552 PDR FOIA PDR 1.5 IM-15260 GARDEOS-59 3
-g(-
r
)
1.6 35-1195-DCP-7 1.7 35-1195-DEI-7 i
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE l
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 1 of 8 TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
- see original signature sheet **
DATE CPSES DOCUMEhT CONTROL REVIEWED BY:
- see original signature sheet **
PROGRAM B&R QA DATE
- see original signature sheet **
TUGC0 QA DATE APPROVED BY
- see criainal sionature sheet **
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER DATE o.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS s
1.0
' REFERENCES
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1
' PURPOSE 2.2 SCOPE i
i 3.0 PROCEDURE C
3.1' REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION
'7
~
3.1.1 Scoce of controlled Documents 3.1.2 Controlled Distribution l
3.1.3 Other Distribution l
3.1.4 Special Distribution 3.2 RECEIPT AND ACCOUNTING FOR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS l
3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Documents l
3.2.2 Accounting for Controlled Documents 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents 3.3.2 Storage of Documents 3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCUREMENT OR HYDRO PACKACES 4.0 ATTACHMENTS No. I Design Change Log No. 2 Document Disposition i
No. 3 Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet No. 4 Controlled Distributuion Request No. 5 Document Distributuion Log
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manual 1.2 35-1195-CP-CPM 6.3 1.3 35-1195-DEI-9 1.4 TUQ-552 1.5 IM-15260 1.6 35-1195-DCP-7 1.7 35-1195-g-]0 35-1195-1.8 J5YPJbfL N
1 JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-ocp_3 Rev.
1s.
This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the foHowing pages with the attached:
Page 5 of.8 Page 6 of 8 Page 1 of 1; Attachment 1 Please attach Page 1 of 8 on original signature <@iet.
l t
Reviewed by:
./
//-t-83 Y
$rown&RootQualityAssurance Originator
/
Date Date k' f (liYI Approved by:
Date TUGC0 Quality fssurance
. h/,9
/ /d8 November 16, 1983 l
Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date l
H
~
)
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEldt ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 4
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-
- nro_,
Rev.ig This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
s Please repla'ce the following page(s) with the attached:
Page 4 of 8 Reviewed by:
/.
/8-Y-83
$;n
/dbo #1 Originator
/
Date gcFBrown & Root Qualit'y ' Assurance Date i1 gg
}eh[
'l'd3 Approved by:
TUGC0 Quality Assurance Date
/u 2/e# /O-V/-9 22 October 11. 1983 Construclion Project Manager Date Effective Date i
I
3 J08 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUM8ER 3
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195 _DCP-3 Rev. 16 This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the folloWng pages with the attached:
Page 4 of 8 Page 5 of 8
- Page 6 of 8 Page 7 of 8 Page 8 of 8
,y s
~
l Procedural change on page 4 only.
Pages 5 through 8 show paragraph movement.
l Reviewed by:
f-Z4*d3 h5 9
t-5 a
Originator,
/
Date
,f rown & Root Quality Assurance Date f7~EJ'A' dorWyb Approved by:
TUGC0 Quality As,sfrance Date huu ptsQ?1 f[J7//3 September 27, 1983 popruction Project Manager Date Effective Date 1
l Nw
l 1
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 2
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-DCP-3 Rev. 16 This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
t Please replace the following page(s) with the attached:
Page 5 of,8
.r
~=--
l l
l Reviewed by:
W 24$
f-2-f_d' ',,
f fy Originator Date i Brown & Root Qu'ality Assurance Date WR awf' Approved by:
TUGC6 Quality gs'urance Date
/
l b
dWdkA&s ?-/V $
Seotember 12. 1983 Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date
/L*-
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure '
DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-ncp.a Rev. is This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please repIace the fo?iowing page(s) with the attached:
Page 7 of 4 c
~ 7
~
(
P Reviewed by:
S'*NY i% V 7
J Crfginator Date 8
,.\\0 rown & Root Quality ssurance Da e i
Approved by:
ji'UGC0 Quatity' Asqurance Date s
/Af f-14-6']
August 24, 1983 Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date h
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE
~
REVISION DATE PAGE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER CPSES JCB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 2 of 8
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the document control activities at the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES).
2.2 SCOPE This procedure addresses the activities of and responsibilities for the control, receipt, reproduction, distribution, storage and retrieval of construction and design documents generated at the site or received by the Document Control Center (DCC).
Instructions, procedures, and/or drawings shall be rea'dily available for use at locations where the prescribed activities are performed, and for use_
by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI).
3.0
'PROCEDUliE 3.1 REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION t-3.1.1 Scooe of Controlled Documents DCC will be resonsible for the reproducifon of controlled documents including, but not limited to, drawings,. specifications, design changes, procedures, instructions, and construction hold notices.
3.1.1.1 Controlled documents (control stamped only)'shall be distributed to the satellites and the several control numbered recipients on the Distribution Routing Control List (DRCL). This in accordance with the Document Disposition (Attachment 2) which is prepared by the DCC Supervisor and lists the satellite control numbers and the several recipient control numbers, the document number and quantities distributed.
DRCL's are prepared in accordance with Construction Procedure DEI-7.
Design changes are distributed to holders of affected controll.ed documents.
3.1.1.2 Distribution of B&R initiated construction procedures is in accor-dance with the " Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet" (Attachment 3) which is received with the procedure from the Pro-cedures Department.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE
~~
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER ~ -
REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 3 of 8 3.1.2 Controlled Distribution 3.1.2.1 Controlled documents will be identified by the red " controlled copy" stamp (shown below) with the satellite and recipient number in the shaded area of the sta CPSES 35-111D5 ot 1
g u
g) b~
oc T COH 3.1.2.2 Upon receipt of project or design documents, the DCC Supervisor shall review the document to ensure the document has been properly approved for use.
Documents not approvad_ or not released for use shall not be issued for construction,1trt may be issued a3 uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3. ~
3.1.2.3 G&H Design drawings must have a numerical. revision designation of a least "0" for issuance.
Drawings without numerical revision designations or with alpha revision designations shall be considered preliminary ' drawings and shall not be issued for construction. These documents may be issued as uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3.
NOTE:
If G&H approval letter revises the status of a preliminary drawing to a TUSI Status 1, it may be issued as a controlled drawing.
t l
3.1.2.4 Controlled documents affected by design change documentation shall be stamped as follows:
lIHIS DOCUMENT AFFECTED BY D.ESIGN CHANGES 3.1.2.5 Revisions to documents including but not limited to, design changes i
and document change notices, which affect other controlled documents, i
shall be distributed to the same control recipients receiving the I
affected document. Revisions to these types of dccuments shall be processed in the same manner as the original issue.
?
. =,
c l
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES 3
I JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 4 of 8 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.3.1 Documents may_be distributed upon request by authorized site personnel for purposes othsr than production (physical construction) or QC inspection activities.
The DCC Supervisor shall maintain a roster of authorized personnel.
DCC shall maintain no responsibility for revisiot, status of documents distributed in this manner.
3.1.3.2 Documents distributed in this manner shall be stamped "FOR OFFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" as follows:
- 0R O-CE AD BG1EEUG_Si0).Y.
~
3.1.3.3 These documents shall be stamped per 3.1.TW ("THIS DOCUMENT
~
AFFECTED BY DESIGN CHANGES") when applicable. DCC shall make available a list of design changes upon request.
3.1.3.4 Documents may be upgraded to controlled status by including the provisions of 3.1.2.
3.1.4 Special Distribution "Special Distribution Schedules" (SDS) will form the basis of all limited engineering document distribution requirements. (See DEI - 10) 3.1.5 Transmittal of Engineering Documentation 3.1.5.1 BRHL's will be issued to engineering organizations as controlled documents per paragraph 3.1.2.
These drawings can be issIIed' to construction organizations per paragraph 3.1.3 Documents issued per paragraph 3.1.3 will be current upon issue only.
It shall be the responsibility of the user or holder to assure current revision control.
3.1.5.2 Documents issued per paragraph 3.1.2 may be used to transmit information to engineering organizations by copying.
These documents shall be stamped "FOR OFFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" and.in. addition the
" CONTROL STAMP" shall be crossed out.
3.2 RECEIPTf AND ACCOUNTING FOR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS l
3.2.1 Receint of Controlled Documents t
PROCEDURE EFFECTZYE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES I
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 5 of 8
- 3. 2.1.1 Satellite Docu=ent Control Centers are the file custodians.
Prior to interface with the crafts and disciplines in the distribution of any controlled documents, DCC personnel shall have completed both of the following requirements:
1.
Document Control Orientation Class 2.
Passing grade on DCC test which is based on a thorough knowledge of DCP-3.
Documentation supporting such. qualification shall be maintained by DCC.
Records for maintainence of qualification are retained by the Training Department in accordance with CP-CPM 2.2.
3.2.l.2 Design change documentation shall be distributed to and maintained at the same location as the affected documents. The satellites shall log design changes as applicable.
No other design changes need be distributed, posted, or maintained in these areas.
If the design change received is the first issue against the affected document, the satellite shall stamp controlled copies of the affected docu=ent(s) with design change indicator'syamp, shown in paragraph 3.1.2.4, make a logsheet (Attachment 1), as applicable, for the affected'docu=ent, and note the design chan'ie number on the logsheet.
NOTE:
Classification of hangers will be governed by the current revision of DCA-5021 which will not be posted in the design change logbooks. DCC will stamp controlled copies of all hanger drawings.
i with the following stamp:
CHECK CURRENT NEVilIIUf3 l
01 DCA - 5021 FO R. H ANGER Cl LLSSIFiCATI17 Nf.f m
1
.4 NOTE:
Small bore hanger logs shall reflect all open and"*" '
incorporated design changes but not drawing revisions.
EXCLUSION:
Design change information shall be distributed to l
organizations holding the affected docunents.
The design change shall be reviewed by responsible personnel to ensure it does not affect the discipline's work activities.
Where they do affect.:he activities, they shall be posted and maintained as discussed above.
If they do not af fect the work activities, the changes need not be posted or maintained.
,_ c
.s,. u
,e et-i
,e e
l i
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE i
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
[
(
JOB 35-1195 i
(
DCP-3 16 8/5/83 6 of 8 l;
3.2.1.3 A record of whom a document was checked out to shall be maintained F
by the satellite.
Documentation issued to the craf t for daily work activities shall be returned at the end of the shif t to the distribution source. Upon receipt of a revised document, the
~
superceded document shall be retreived and replaced with the current document.
Superceded documents may be retained by the I
holder.
If retained the drawings shall be stamped " VOID" and
(
"FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY".
l NOTE:
Documents (controll'ed),may be checked out to persons in the disciplines or groups other than the crafts for extended periods of time.
It is mandatory however, that the signout i
log list the name, group, location and telephone extension t
of the copyholder so that the document may be updated should it go out of revision or a design change be entered against the document.
It is the satellites obligation to maintain-this update.
~
3.2.1.4 If the' document being received is a DCN, the satellite custodian must mark the DCN number on the cover sheet of the affected pro cedure and file the DCN with the procedu're.
=-
7 NOTE:
Only when a new revision of a document is distributed j
will a new updated log sheet be distributed with that document.
Upon receipt of the new log sheet from the i
DCC, file custodian,s should replace the old log sheet j
in their Design Change Log Book with the new one, and discard the old log sheet.
j f
3.2.1.4
" Mail-out" distribution is made by letter accompanied by DRCL.
[
l 3.2.2 Accounting for Controlled Documents i
p i'
3.2.2.1 All satellites and the severa1 control numbers will be the subject j
of monitoring by an independent monitoring team. This team shall report directly to the Superv.isor of DCC.
This group sha11-nonitor all controlled document files to ensure that all applicable design i
documents are current and that design change logs, manual and computer, show the current approved and issued design change infor=ation.
All monitoring will be a continuing operation -
7 I
satellite to satellite.
3.2.2.2 Monitoring shall be perfermed by using the " Recipient Trace" issued to each satellite and the several control numbers by7he central DC,C, which will indicate:
1.
~ Those documents they are shown as having.
2.
Appropriate revision of liocu=ent.
3.
The number of copies of tche document they have.
I l
L
1 T
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVIS10N DATE PAGE CPSES i
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 7 of 8 To monitor the design change logs, the monitoring team will compara j
the Master Dec logs with satellite and control number logs.
When that has been done, the physical design change files shall be checked at each file location.
3.2.2.3 The monitoring team group leader shall write a memo to the DCC Supervisor indicating the monitorieg activity has been completed and noting any discrepancies and corrective action taken.
These monitoring reports shall be maintained in the DCC central office.
i 3.2.2.3 When a controlled document is checked out to a foreman or crafts-man, he becomes responsible for its security.
In the event the document is lost, the DCC satellite from which the document was logged out sffbuld be notified as quickly as possible.
The satellite supervisor shall notify the craft superintendent in writing of the loss and Tequest that appropriate action be taken.
i To obtain a." replacement" copy of a controlled document the satellite supervisor must complete a " Controlled Distribution Request" form j
(Att'achment 4) specifying document numbe7 revision and number of copies to be replaced.
This request must be signed and submitte'd i
to the DCC Computer Distribution Group. W replacement DRCL will then be issued to the Document Reproduction Group for processing.
l l
3.2.2.4 If for any reason, a superceded document is retained, the face of the ~
document must be stamped'or marked " VOID".
When no longer required, s,uperceded documents should be destroyed.
EXCLUSION:
Drawings issued in accordance with paragraph 3.4 and drawings issued for use in Hanger Packages are not subject to the aforementioned audits. '
DCC will maintain a file for DRCL's with signed acknowledgement by File Custodians verifying actual receipt of controlled documents.
A cross-check will be performed to ensure receipt of documents and the appropriate discipline will be notified of any discrepencies.
3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents The DCC shall maintain a file of current document revisions and as-built drawings as they are received.
Additionally, a listing of all such documents and a list of all active chaTg'es shall be maintained.
h A # 9"T f n 9 an
j PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE I
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 8 of 8 3.3.2 Storage of Documents Project Record files are stored by the DCC. These include, but are not limited to, specifications, proce~dures, correspondence, manuals, drawings, aperture cards, and silver microfiche originals.
3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCUREMENT OR HYDRO PACKAGES Documents required for fabrication, installation and/or inspection may be issued for inclusion into a traveler, procurement or hydro package. The document shall be identified as being part of the package and that it cannot be used independently of the package by stating on the document "This document shall be used only in conjuction with Operation Traveler i NOTE:
For hydro packages, the hydro number shall be entered instead of the traveler number, and the number identified as a hydro test number.
NOTE:
For procurement packages, the bidtpurchase order number shall be entered instead of the tfaveler number,.and the number identified as bid /purcWe order number.
-It shall be the responsibility of the orga'nization controlli$g the package to ensure the current document revision number is referenced in the package.
EXCLUSION:
Traveler packages containing drawings which have weld numbers assigned by Welding Engineering, and all_ Hanger Packages, are excluded from the aforementioned control alternative.
i i
Q.
$Y
~
i PROCEDURE EFFECTZVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES i
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN CHANGE LOG (Typical)
V622 C =\\/
1 i es,
n,,8 Uc ic.1 c w,
ia,,,0
,e,,
w i
l i
l i l
l l
- l l
l l
l _
i I
l l
l l
I l l
l l
1 4*
I l i i
i i
l I
i l i l
I l
i l
i I &
I i
i l
l l
l l
6 I
i i
i I 6 i
i l
i 7
I i
i i l
I 1
- [,
1 I
I b
_.I I
e i
I f
I I F 1
i
-I l_
l I
i !
I i
i i
l i
i b
': l ' I i
l t
i 1 P
.I I
i l_
i l
4 6 i
l i
-l l
l l I l
l l
e 1
i i
l i i
i l-0 I
i >
l i
1 l
l l l
1 8
i 1
0 1
1 b l
l l
l 6
i i 1
)
I e
l.
I l
i i t I
1 1
1 6
I I
i i
i 1
i e
e i i i
i I
1 I
i 1 1 i
i I
L i
8 6 6
I I
J ___ _
l i
.I i
i e
i l
l l
l l
6 l
]
1 I
i l
i i
f
}
f a
i_
1 1
1 l
l 1
1 1 1 1
4 8
i i
i e i e
?
I e
1 I
i l
s i
i e
e e
t 1
1 1
I i
1 6
3 I
e i 1 e
1 6
I t
i t
i i
t 4
e e
i i
e i
e I
?
e t
n s
PROCEDURE E.:FECTIVE l BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE j
PAGE CPSES i
I l
JOB 35-1195 l
DCP.3 16 l
8-5-83 1 of 1 ATTAC.W ENT 2 DOCUMENT DISPOSITION t CF 2 SCCU.*ENT.0:27C1;M :M
!'-t[97 C 7 07 2'*"' * * '
- i CCM' M d?
E 1
4 nE?M C U:T*:N..MC'U.*
- 7*
46 C::C !!!U2 ACUNN L:27 XE?T
- E' I::UE 4ETU FM t. :T' 4t??
07 04 001 001. 000 000 000 002 001 000 000 000 09 00i 003 000 000 000 005 001 000 000 000 11 007 00%
000 000 GCC 041 00:
400 000 400 tL 012 0 0 *,
000 000 003' 0;?
001 000 000 000 12 022 001 000 000 000 02h 00:
000 000 000 13 023-
- 002 000 000 000 02E "0 02 000 00
.000 ta.Osa Oct 400 Ce9 000 G:3 7 001 000 000 000-15 040 001 ' 000 000 000 Cat 00t 000 000. 600 t h 0 45-001 000 007 000 044 00; 000 Oc0 000 17 Gaa 0:I 000 Oca 400 050
-401 000 000 400 e
I l
l I
I i
I
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE :
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE j
PAGE CPSES t
JOB 35-1155 DCP-3 l
16 8-5-83 l of 1 ATTACENENT 3 OCC2Tf7 ACUT!*:3 "3 Tr3 :::: TIT C iTIO. Or:*It DCC: TIT!..:
TitCM CATE:
(C E:.1i.A ;;::)
E1:L 13 *.C4':" 013:
O sisma:a -
C Hold
, C Fl*e Only :..o :is-Mhtt:=
m C tcuts ':r 1:; : val (6.:.te: ns :aly)
- 7 Q cue.:
L
~-
6 DI53:!UT::::
SPT::.A:. L%'C-*..;3:
e E.idcalot ac. nies;acant i4utes ay, eata
.A".a l
Nw
FRCCEURE
! EF:ECTIVE EROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION l OATE PAGE CPSE3 JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 4 -
l CCNTRCL NO.
CONTROLLED OtSTRISLITION REQUEST N9 1 $g7 ACCITIONAL REPtACsvtNT AtTURN NAOCEUSIONLY s
JATE i
CaCL CAft I
i l
. AfV.,' NUMe t R C F P'J ACN A$E t
CCCUMENTra AwthG NuuSER
! PACE W.
NC.
CCPIES vtNC *4 C AC(A e
!"A 't.$
i i
l s
i i
- I l-D 1
l i
l i
l 1
i i
l i
I l
l n.c.s
..a.i.e w. -ir
.a.a.
l'
.NgtnuCTfCMS 70 #EcutITCA-
* a * *in m e t.passemeeses 1 Asia a vaw C.we 18v: vuswee & 85as Cae g.a A* ment toises u
i I
l 1
I t
h l
l l
l
{
?
^7 4
D"
PROCEDURE E :ECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER
' REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 OCP-3 16 8-5-83 1 of 1 ATTACHf1ENT 5 l
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LOG
- :. t :::-t:t.- ;.::
- .:... n PQC -
- _i - s<ms: :< i:: :::
8e : :-
i I'
4e si.n i
a.:. :.:: - t
..c w :r i
em am. s i sm -.n au l
74 >
e
- s'**
I I
I i
i l
i I
I li.
I i
I-I l
.l*
,I l
l l
1 l
1 1
i I
I l
I I
I I
l
-l 1
L I
I l
I I
I llj i
l l
l 1
1
' i.
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
l I
i l
i i
l I
I I
I I
I I
1 i
1 v
-AL-
j hodCPS [yj,t t y PG-29 Paga 1 of 20 r
{
- 29. SITE REVIEW OF CMC'S, DCA'S and S-0910's A.
Objective This procedure establishes the guidelines under which the CPSES site-based design change review team shall operate.
B.
Desfinitions CMC's/DCA's Document changes or deviations to specified design / construction requirements initiated by authorized field personnel after release of engineering documents approved for fabrication or construction.
CMC Component Modification Card DCA Design Change Authorization S-0910 :
Sheet providing design details for supporting electrical conduits.
C.
General The site design change review team members shall be employees of Gibbs & Hill, Inc.
TUSI Nuclear Engineering (TNE) personnel, C.?
subject to the approval of Gibbs & Hill, may be team members for the review of those CMC's within the screening criteria established in GTN-46771.
The team supervisor shall be an experienced Gibbs & Hill employee appointed by the Gibbs & Hill Vice President - Power Engineering and the Project Manager, with the approval of the TUSI Comanche Peak Manager of Engineering.
For site administrative purposes only, the team supervisor shall report to the
- Manager, TUSI Nuclear Engineering.
On all technical matters, excluding design review, the site team members shall be responsible, through the team supervisor and the G&H Project
- Manager, to their respective discipline job engineers, chiefs and managers.
Design reviewers shall be responsible to the appropriate Chief Engineer for their design review activities.
On all G&H project administrative matters, the site team personnel shall be responsible, through the team supervisor, to the Gibbs & Hill Project Manager.
The team supervisor shall be authorized by the Vice President -
Power Engineering to sign-off as job engineer for all disciplines.
The team supervisor may appoint an alternate job engineer for the design change review effort, subject to approval by the Vice President - Power Engineering.
V-128 2323 Project Guide Revised 4
PG-29 Page 2 of 20 4
j f' Team members shall be designated as design reviewers for CMC's/DCA's/S-0910's and associated calculations by the appropriate discipline chief engineers, as necessary.
1 i
D.
Scope The site design change review team shall review CMC's, DCA's and S-0910's except as detailed below for G&H NY review.
Additionally, they may review certain CMC's in accordance with the screening criteria established in GTN-46771, (refer. to Project Guide section V, procedure No. 24, paragraph 0).
The following design changes shall continue to be reviewed in New
]
York:
1 i
All security system (safeguards information) design e
changes.
I All Unit 2 CMC's and DCA's, excepting those which affect Unit 1 completion and those which are Structural lead.
E.
Application - CMC's ar.3 DCA's J
j 1.
Gibbs & Hill Site
) (*,
In principle, the site design change review team shall conduct its reviews in accordance with Project Guide Section V, procedure 4
no.
24,
" Processing CMC's and DCA's".
The following exceptions to this procedure apply:
a)
The TUSI Design Change Tracking Group (DCTG) shall j
forward copies of CMC's/DCA's to the G&H Team Supervisor.
Supporting documentation referenced on j
design changes shall be provided by the DCTG.
Additional documentation is available to the site review team on request.
i i
b)
.The Team Supervisor or designee shall stamp all incoming
]
design changes with a G&H received date stamp.
The Team Supervisor or designee shall maintain a log for CMC's and DCA's received.
c)
The Team -Supervisor or designee shall attach a change verification checklist on top of each CMC /DCA, and add the received
- date, and CMC /DCA number and revision number to the checklist.
i j
d)
The design change shall be forwarded to the lead j
discipline team personnel for review.
The lead j
discipline enginerr shall arrange for and coordinate i k-V-129 2323 Project Guide Revised February 28, 1984
.-- L.- ---.-.--
PG-29 Pcga 3 of 20
(-
by the team members, as appropriate.
interdiscipline engineering review, and design review, e)
On completion of all. phases of review, the design change package (including telecon records, calculations, etc.)
shall be returned to the Team Supervisor or designated job engineer for sign -off.
f)
Completed design change packages shall be distributed as follows:
For CMC's - design change package with original checklist telecon records and calculations to DCTG l
files.
Copy of checklist only to G&H New York, attention Project Manager, under cover of standard TSG transmittal letter and 1,isting (refer to Attach-ment A).
For DCA's - design change package with oriainal checklist to G&H New York, attention Project Manager, under cover of standard TSG trqnsmittal letter and listing (refer to Attachment A).
Copy of checklist, telecon records and calculations to site DCTG file.
l 2.
Gibbs & Hill New York a)
Incoming transmittals of completed checklists (CMC's) and design, change packages (DCA's) shall be forwarded to the Project Coordinator for CMC's/DCA's (PC).
Transmittal memos / listings shall be Tiled.
b)
PC or designee shall enter in the appropriate master.
index log all required information from the CMC /DCA checklist.
The note "G&H site review" shall be entered in the remarks column of the index.
(Note:
effective October 10, 1983, G&H NY no longer maintains the G&H DCA Master Index, per TSG-3070 dated October 4, 1983).
l c)
PC or designee shall make internal G&H New York distribution of the checklist or design change package as indicated on the checklist.
d)
On completion of index entry and distribution, the checklists and design change packages shall be filed in the appropriate individual file.
('
V-130 2323 Project Guide Revised February 28, 1984 l
PG-29 Page 4 of 20
[
t F.
Application - S-0910's 1.
Gibbs & Hill Site In principle, the site design change review team shall conduct its reviews in accordance with Project Guide Section V, procedure no.
27,
" Processing the ;2323-S-0910 Package."
The following exceptions to this procedure apply:
a)
CPPE Civil shall forward copies of S-0910's and supporting documentation to the G&H Team Supervisor, or designee.
b)
The Team Supervisor or designee shall stamp all incoming S-0910's with a G&H received date stamp.
The Team Supervisor or designee shall maintain a log for S-0910's received..
c)
The Team Supervisor or designee shall attach a change verification checklist on top of each S-091-0
- package, and add the received
- date, and S-0910 number and revision number to the checklist.
. d ).
The S-0910 package shall be forwarded to the lead
(~.
discipline team personnel for review.
The lead discipline engineer shall arrange for and coordinate interdiscipline engineering review, and design
- review, by the team members, as appropriate, e)
On completion of all phases of
- review, the S-0910 package shall be returned to the Team Supervisor or designee for sign-off.
The Team Supervisor or designee shall sign-off as lead discipline job engineer, f)
Completed S-0910 packages shall be distributed as follows:
i S-0910 package with original checklist, telecon record and calculations to DCTG files.
Copy of checklist only to G&H NY, attention Project Manager, under cover of standard TSG transmittal letter and listing.
l V-131 2323 Project Guide Revised February 28, 1984 i
PG-29 Pcgo 5 of 20 j,
2.
Gibbs & Hill New York Effective October 3,
1983,. G&H New York no longer enters checklist information for site reviewed S-0910's in the G&H S-0910 log.
A log or index for site reviewed S-0910's shall be maintained by the Client.
G.
Calculations
- Calculations may be required to verify the acceptability of proposed design changes or deviations.
They shall be handled as follows:
1.
For design changes issued with supporting new.cnf revised calculations prepared by the originator, the appropriate site design change review team member shall check the calculations in accordance with Project Procedures Manual DC-7.
Site generated calculations need not be l
performed on G&H standard calculation sheets.
- However, the content of these calculations shall be in accordance with DC-7.
4 2.
For design changes issued without supporting calculations, the appropriate site design change review
(~
team member shall prepare new calculations, or revisions to existing calculations, in accordance with DC-7.
For non-safety related
- changes, a site design change review team member, independent of the
- preparer, shall check the calculations.
For safety related changes, the calculations shall be checked by either of the following:
a)
An available G&H site based employee with appropriate experience.
b)
A TUSI Nuclear Engineering - employee with appropriate experience.
c)
A CPPE employee with appropriate experience.
Note:
For non-G&H personnel, the Team Supervisor shall be responsible for QA indoctrination in the application of Procedures DC-7 and DC-8.
This indoctrination shall be documented.
3.
A copy of the completed calculations generated by either
- 1) or 2) above shall be attached to the design change kJ V-132 2323 Project Guide Revised February 28, 1984
PG-29 Page 6 of 20
- package, unless the calculation has been fully approved and incorporated in an original calculation book.
4.
During the course of the independent design review of the design change, the G&H design reviewer shall design review the supporting calculations, if any.
5.
The Team Supervisor or designee shall transmit the original of site generated new or revised calculations to the cognizant G&H NY Job Engineer on a regular basis, except where the site generated calculations are fully approved and incorporated in an original calculation book at the site.
The New York Job Engineer shall be responsible for either the incorporation or referencing of these calculations in the original cal'culations maintained in New York, assigning revision numbers and making entries on the calculation cover sheet as required.
The New York engineering disciplines shall verify tha,t the site calculations do not conflict with recent calculation revisions generated in New York but not yet received by the site duplicate file.,
6.
The original calculations need not be design reviewed in New York when they are revised solely for the purpose of C'i incorporating CMC's/DCA's which have already been design reviewed.
H.
Miscellaneous 1.
If it is necessa,ry to change the status of a design change which has completed the site team review cycle and has been forwarded to G&H New York, the site Team Supervisor shall coordinate with the New York Project Coordinator in the implementation of the guidelines established in Project Guide section V, procedures no.
i 24 and 27.
2.
If it is necessary to change the status of a design l
. change which has completed the site team review cycle l
and has been forwarded to the DCTG files, the site Team l
Supervisor is responsible for implementation of the change of status guidelines.
3.
In the event of a disagreement between an engineering l
reviewer and a design reviewer, they shall discuss the l
issue with the Team Supervisor to obtain resolution.
If j
the Team Supervisor is unable to resolve the problem, or i
needs additional technical
- guidance, he shall l
communicate with the appropriate discipline job engineer i
in New York.
,[\\..
l V-133 2323 Project Guide Revised l
February 28, 1984 E
PG-29 P&go 7 of 20
,f s
4.
In accordance with established procedures, the functions of design review and job engineer review canot be performed by one individual on a
specific CMC /DCA.
Accordingly, for those CMC's/DCA's design reviewed by the Team Supervisor, he shall designate another team member from his discipline as Job Engineer.
5.
For the PBS and Chemical Engineering disciplines, the appropriate chief engineers shall provide limited authorization to the Mechanical discipline team members to perform engineering and design review of CMC's/DCA's.
These ' limits shall be delineated in guidelines attached to the authorization memorandum (Refer to Attachments 8 and C).
6.
For the Architectural discipline, the chief architect shall provide limited authorization to the Structural discipline team members to perform engineering and design review of CMC's/DCA's.
These limits shall be delineated in guidelines attached to the authorization memorandum (Refer to Attachment D).
(Noter-effective July 21,
- 1983, responsibility for review of Architectural design changes has been transferred to the Structural discipline).
7(-
7.
Where interdiscipline review input may be required from other supporting disciplines not represented in the site
- team, (e.g. Applied Mechanics, Special
- Analysis, Nuclear / Shielding, QA/QC, Consulting Engineering, etc.),
the lead discipline engineer shall communicate with the appropriate G&H New York personnel.
Telecons which have a
bearing on the disposition shall be documented by handwritten telephone conversation records.
8.
Discussions with design change originators shall be documented by handwritten conversation records (telecon records or memoranda, as appropriate).
(
9.
Conversation records shall be assigned sequential number identification from a log.
Conversation records shall i
be referenced on the checklist and a copy attached to l
the design change package.
I i
I.
Audits The Gibbs & Hill QA Department shall be responsible for auditing the site design review team in accordance with this procedure.
I' i
d' V-134 2323 Project Guide Revised February 28, 1984 i
Attrhment A P.G.
29 PCg3 8 Of 20 i;-
- i
.t!..s.;,';.n.l.\\ei
'r.d W.
! r --
- ..? i 3 8 4 9 s. s) l Mr. R. E. 5allard, Jr.
7i:fs i Hill. Inc.
.;;-3 Seventh Avenue
..a York. *1ew York 10001 COMANCHE PEAR 51EAM El.i.CTRIC STAT 10ti DESIGriED REVIEWED DCA'S/ CMC'S
Dear Mr. Ballard:
Attached is Transmittq,1 r@f 002, which includes a listing and the DCA's/ CMC's with associated change verification checklist that have been reviewed and aporoved by Gibbs & Hill site.
'!cej *.e uly jo. re,.
~
y..
D. R. Wayman Duplicate file REncevgo g
cc:
ARMS R. Tolson-TUGC0 Site (w/lis t) ggg3 g g g u
P'<.o.e acknowledge receipt and completeness of transmittal paci.aje by.ip.ing, dating and returning this letter to:
Duplica te file-TNE, C.P.S.E.S.
Signature:
Da te I
i V-135,
2323 Proiect Guide February 26, 1984
i P.G. 29
* *. :w * ' {gtactunent A Pcc3 9 of 20
.C-TS ". %,1,R,,,,,,,,
f'
..:CA TRAll!77A*..J -
ATT. Tw". s.L. 4_
- 'icTE
- c:5C:o'::E..-....
wm a py,,
N "-
ro n n"UM-C'5ES t;;:1T =
3.. g=..
- -n.
.m
- = -
Otner
.ti
'l I
Cther i
C:'C Ca}culations Sucoorting
[
C:'Ch
. Calculatices Sw: corti Ti.
i attacned Doc'nents 40.
Attacaec hc. er.r g,
' s Rev. t;c.
. t E5@/i:R)
, Attached
,V l
l (YES/p0J d yJ, I __ _ _,__
_,l._('iES,*:ic/nK)
S Rev. No.
,At(;cn.,-
g
.{.1..fNO.I
^"
21 J b8 L R RO
- M-1.
1
/ f* 9 9 f13 lL< Kg Qol' l
lIL 1 f3 no
'22 2
- IM1771$
M* /[T U
l f*, T2R*f #J)23 I i
i 3
.i L L o C 9 0 i
A 1 L 2._9 f.S.0.1
^*
14 19 0 39 7 '$
~~
frt Tf/YU
- - _ l. 6.s.a s..R.Q l_
2 s ! i A o S 7 7 2,,_ _____,,,, _
j
'n
^~
26 % 9 9 7 _R d,.,,. _ __,,,,,,,y,gg,A
~6. J.L'f.ko. 1 3,.
n 27 : 1 % 4 ')..U :
~'
^-
('-
_ l L s s L _a o I i
i:
- 1939._2.,
s i c e9 e g o.i..
_~.
28
29 jly,gQ_],(
I u sJr_JLo'L.._..
l
^-
~
9 l'30 R &(,_
i
',I QLL3 93 __
~'~
10
, g s-s I 11
)33s9 94 5
'31 il b iR310!
I
^*
~~
- M m 'n 12
- Lqno Ro
. ~ -
'32 l L 14] gg i
23
.I6904 10 13 lM_9 R0 l
i i
_ ~ ~
3'
' LL2.o_7._3_Qi _.....
~
14
'lLeoc_.R.n l
^*
(5 i L6 L31 li
^
15 I l L qu 09 j'36
. J (g')$' lo
^
i 16 iL413 90 lIRDAO 9 %
- i. _.T
/
l 17 i ei L,9 R IV 31
^~
i t
i ysp w.u M1tre i
e 18
!!Lo9i
'A 1 l 38
! l.69_o.4: T.3...
l
^'
S9 !/c,t L3 R l !
i
^y _m,is9iL 9 f, lYT, * 'd/ /7 (
l e
~
1C,.l.4lt_1 M. m. _.__ _
,...-......... - 9_
! @_T!.$-.11 J
/,j-2323 Project Guide V-136 February 28, 1984
Attcchm:nt B P.G.
29 i?
(,'
,I'
,) pega 10 of 20 NN8 b N!!' EN*
Interoffice Memorandum u
N.N.Keddis/M.S. Miller April 13, 1983 T0,:
DATE:
G.D.Weatherford 2323 JOB NO:
FROM:
Designation of Design Reviewers, Project Bldg. Services Effective April 5, 1983, the following Mechanical Discipline personnel are a#thorized to perform engineering and design review of CMC's and DCA's at site on behalf of Project Building Services in accordance with the attached guidelines:
Section 11212 G.J.Finnerty Section 11212 P.Yallouris r~
GDWalc
~
Attachment CC:
M.A.Vivirito R.E.Ballard/M.Sims/.850 L.F. Giannuzzi J. Irons G.D.Weatherford E.Nicolaysen P.Gilson (G&H Site)
M.w.cnaoman.
M. Strange (TUSI THE Site) i l
b 2323 Project Guide February 28, 1984 y_137 r.tas,s.re
P.G.
29 AttEchment B
( ;
Pago 11 of 20 l
.,.e April 13, 1983
- p REVIEW OF PROJECT BUILDING SERVICES CMC /DCA DOCUMENTS AT JOBSITE The following guidelines are to be used when reviewing CMC /DCA 1
i documents pertaining to Project Building Services systems:
i l.
Fire Protection System The Fire Protection System is a non-safety QA program i
applicable system, in accordance with G&H Project Procedures Manual and Project Guide.
Therefore, design i
j
. changes written against the Fire Protection System require design review.
Documents that may be reviewed'by non-PBS personnel l
a.
are those which make no change to the system or specifications and do not violate any NFPA Codes, 4
for example:
j
- pipe rerouting within same fire area
- electrical conduit rerouting within same fire area
- typographical error 4
1
[(['
b.
Any addition / modification / deletion in any fire j
protection or fire detection system shall be reviewed j
in consultation with Andy Bartlik of Gibbs & Hill, 4
New York (x6320) either by:
f (i) calling him for review by phone j
(ii) transmitting the change by telecopy and then contacting him on the phone j
(iii) sending the CMC /DCA for review at G&H i
NY if both parties agree.
i
)
Any CMC /DCA changing a specification shall be trans-c.
i mitted to Gibbs & Hill New York for review.
Arrange for one copy of each CMC /DCA reviewed at site to be sent to A. Bartlik, G&H, New York.
2.
HVAC System l
Changes involving ductwork rcrouting or any other i
a.
- i ductwork modifications have to be analyzed checking the system requirements, flow diagrams, air distribution, standards of design and construction.
l -
j\\-
l
- l 2323 Project Guide V-138 Feoruary 28, 1984
Attcchment.B
[. '.
(,
([)
Pags 12 of 20 P.G. 29 f'.
+..
b.
Pressure losses have to be taken into consideration, especially when duct changes involve so called " longest run"; the original pressure drop calculation has to be revised and a new calculation has to be added to the CMC /DCA showing the pressure drop increase.
Fan capacity shall be checked.
When new equipment is added, heat loads have to be, c.
checked, as well as the ambient temperature, to determine whether the existing air change is suf-ficient to keep the ambient temperature within design criteria.
d.
CMC's/DCA's pertaining to the following shall be discussed with G&H, New Yorks
- HVAC equipment changes or modifications
- Specification changes
- Changes affecting FSAR commitments These changes shall be handled in accordance with 1'
paragraph 1(b) above except that the contact is l-N. Kun (x6313).
3.
Plumbing Systems All CMC's/DCA's may be reviewed at site.
If cons.ultation with GsH/NY is required, contact J. Stone (x4891).
If there are any questions on these guidelines, contact Emil Nicolaysen (x4871).
l l
I k.
i I
V-13'9 2323 Project Guide l
February 28, 1984 t
-Attcchm:nt C Page 13 of 20
(
)
OE 8 b NIN' EN" Interoffice Memorandue N.N.Keddis/M.S. Miller April 12, 1983 H.A.Schlesinger 2323 g
Designation of Design 3gg Reviewers, Chemical Engineering Effective April 5, 1983, the following Mechanical Discipline personnel are authorized to perform engi-neering and design review of CMC's and DC.i's at site on behalf of Chemical Engineering in accordance with the attached guidelines:
Section 11212 G.J.Finnerty Section 11212 P.Yallouris
-(~ '
S.
c Attachment CC:
M. A.Vivirito R.E.Ballard/M.Sims/850 L.F.Giannuzf,i J. Irons H.A.Schlesinger M.Chiruvolu P.Gilson (G&H Site)
C.T. Chapman,
M. Strange (TUSI TNE Site)
Q.*
2323 Project Guide V-l'40 February 28, 1984 p., u,,,,,
Attachmint C P G.
29
{ '.
}Page 14 of 20 April 12, 1983 REVIEW OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CMC /DCA DOCUMENTS AT JOBSITE i
The following guidelines are to be used when reviewing CMC /DCA documents pertaining to Chamical Engineering systems:
I 1.
Documents that may be reviewed by non-Chemical Engineering personnel are those pertaining to:
)
- Minimum wall thickness violation
- Pipe gradient deviation from specification i
- Valve number revision
- Line number revision
- Misfabrigated pipe spool
- Weld relocation
~
- Document revision to correct typos or other minor l
errors previously cited and documented 1
I 2.
All the other CMC /DCA's are to be discussed with Mr. Chirvuolu.
If the documents cannot be promptly dispositioned by a telephone call, they shall be telecopied for review in New York.
The reply will be sent back in 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />.
For your guidance, the documents that are to be' discussed with Chemical Engi1eering personnel pertain to:
- Process changes (changes tu basic system design)
- Pipe rerouting
- Protective coatings l
- Radioactive waste management (RWMS-QA) l
- Materials oficonstruction changes
- Specification changes 3.
The following is a list of Chemical Engineering systems, drawings and specifications:
l A.
Systems - CF, SS, PS, SB,.CP, WP, GH, WT i,
!-,L 2323 Project Guide i
V-141 February 28, 1984 i
...,----.----,__-,n.-
Atttchment.C p,G, 29
{'
Pegs 15 of 20 o
- r.. ;
i B.
Drawings 2323-M1-0221 2323-M2-0222
-0222 0228
-0224 0228-01
-0224-01 0239
-0228 0244
-0228-01 0264
-0239
-0244
-0264 thru 0270 C.
Specifications 2323-MS-150 152 154
\\
155 156 159A 160A r..
161
' L' 161A 162A 162B 163 163A 164 165 l
If you have any comments or questions on the above, please i
contact Mr. M. Chiruvolu (x5206) or Mr. K. Talk (x5148).
I i
V #
i i
(
2323 Project Guide V-1.42 February 28, 1984 I
,..,-_,_ _ _ __ _ _.____. - _.,_ _ r__
Attachmipt, D P.G.
29 k.
) Pago 16 of 20 t.
G /$3d78 8 NIlle8 N =
Interoffice Memorandum
\\.\\
N.N.Keddis/M.S. Miller April 12, 1983 D.E.MacDonald 2323 Designation of Design REF. N0:
Reviewers, Architectural Department Effective April 5, 1983, the following Structural Discipline pe,rsonnel are authorized to perform engineering and design review of CMC's'and DCA's at site on behalf of Architectural Department in accordance with the attached guidelines:
Section 11237
- J. Borzooyeh Section 41142
- R. P.
Shah
\\..
'/
DEMacDile Attachment CC:
M. A. Vivirito R. E. Ballard/M. Sims/850 C. M. Jan E. L. Bezkor D. E. MacDonald H. Raemsch P. Gilson (G&H Site)
^ A 1. Cnapmam-
B. Czarnogorski
\\.;
2323 Project Guide V 143 February 28, 1984
!~'****'*
- O*
28 Attachmeyt D
'l
'. /
Page 17 of 20 April 12, 1983
- f-,..
GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING ARCHITECTURAL CMC's/DCA'r BY REVIEW TEAM AT THE SITE General - The attached list of specifications generally covers all architectural materials and equipment to be furnished.
Desi$n changes relating to the majority of these items may be processed without reference to New York, except as noted hereinafter.
1.
Refer questions on the following Safety Related items to New York, except questions which obviously have only minor impact:
a.
Watertight Doors - Specification 2323-AS-27 b.
Missile Resisting Doors - Specification 2323-AS-54 c.
Protective Coatings - Specification 2323-AS-31 For items a and b (drawings) call:
Jerry Stern (x4660)
For items a and b (specifications) call:
Bill Fergus (x4462)/
Hank Raemsch (x4659)
For item c call Chemical Engineering:
Keith Falk (x5148)
, -(_
Changes in some architectural lead items may impact the 2.
~
requirements of other disciplines and need their approval, for example:
a.
Tornado venting (Mechanical) :
Affected by changes in wall, floor and roof openings, grilles, registers,
' dampers, doors, walls, etc.
b.
Fire protection:- Affected by wall and floor construction, fire separation walls, doors, stairs, spray-on fire-proofing, etc.
c.
Security:
Affected by changes in walls, doors and frames, door. hardware, penetration and bullet-resisting l
doors, guard' houses, etc.
d.
Various code _ requirements will, of course, be affected
.by changes in the items noted above and others.
If there are any queries relating to these guidelines, please contact Bill Fergus (x4662) or Hank Raemsch (x4659).
If in the opinion of Mr. Borzooyeh or Mr. Shah, there is any doubt about action to be taken on any matter it should be discussed or forwarded to Mr. Raemsch or Mr. Stern.
auMB -
l 2323 Project Guide V,144 February 28, 1984
Attechmapt D P.G.
29 g,g r3,___
(;raye 10 or 20 LIST OF ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS Specification No.
Title
~
2323-AS-2 Site Fencing 2323-AS-3 Plastic Skylights 2323-AS-4 Unit Masonry 2323-AS-5 Miscellaneous Metal Work 2323-AS-6 Metal Stairs-Railings & Handrails 2323-AS-7 Metal Gratings 2323-AS-8 Ornamental Metals 2323-AS-9 Metal Siding 2323-AS-10 Carpentry 7-2323-AS-ll Millwcrk 2323-AS-12, Roofing & Insulation 2323-AS-13 special Roofing 2323-AS-14 Sheet Metal Work 2323-AS-15 Fluid Applied Waterproofing 2323-AS-16 Caulking & Sealants 2323-AS-17 Aluminum Doors & Frames 2323'-AS-18 Hollow Metal Doors & Frames 2323-AS-19 Aluminum Windows 2323-AS-20 Roof Hatches 2323-AS-21 Glass & Glazing
'2323-AS-22 Finishing liardware 2323-AS-22A Finish Hardware-(,
2323 Project Guide V-145
- #""#Y
P.G. 29
'D
/
AttachmIyi Paga 19 of 20 s
i rI Specification No.
Title 2323-AS-23 Folding Doors 2323-AS-25 Rolling Steel Doors I
2323-AS-26 Vinyl Wall Covering 2323-AS-27 Watertight Doors 2323-AS-28 Metal Pan Ceiling 2323-AS-29 Ceramic Tile Work 2323-AS-30 Painting 2323-AS-31 Protective Coating 2323-AS-32 Acoustical Treatment 2323-AS-33 Resilient Flooring 2323-AS-34 Metal Furring & Lathing 2323-AS-35 Plastering
-(,
2323-AS-36 Gypsum Drywall 2323-AS-37 Movable Metal Partitions 2323-AS-38 Toilet Partitions 2323-AS-39 Toilet Access 2323-AS-40 Lockers & Benches 2323-AS-41 Shop Furniture 2323-AS-42 Kitchen Cabinets r
2323-AS-43 Special Coatings 2323-AS-44 Hydraulic Elevator 2323-AS-45 Traction Elevator 2323-AS-47 Sprayed-on Fireproofing 2323-AS-50 Ladder Climbers Safety Device 2323-AS-52 Laundry Room Equipment A
f l
V-145a
-323 Projec,t Guide February 28, 1984
~Attachasat D P.G.
29 Page 20 of 20 Specification No.
Title i-2323-AS-53 Hydraulic Lift 2323-AS-54 Missile Resistant Doors 4,323-AS-55 Spray-On Insulation 2323-AS-56 Bldg Insulation (Rigid) 2323-AS-57 Louvered Ceiling 2323-AS-59 Railroad Doors 2323-AS-60 Seamless Polyvinyl Chloride Flooring 2323-AS-61 Bullet Resisting & Penetration Resisting Doors
%.s l
l l
x V-145b 2323 Project Guide February 28, 1984
90 k - h
@Tvf dl b
{6 -[ 6D
,M@
DG Mfg 1
A I don't know if I uncerstand that.
- r.
" f' 2
Q Well, it's an all-encompassing question now:
do 3
you, while you were supervisor there, did you ever know of
{
any instance where anybody in your satellite falsified any 4
5 of the documents they were hahdling; that you knew in your 6
mind they were creating false documentation.
7 I know you were just handling these documents.
8 But did you ever know of any instances of anybody falsifying 9
any documents?
j 10 A
You mean like sticking a CMC into a package that 11 it didn't po?
j 12 Q
That it was not supposed to be in?
{'
13 A
Yuh, 'cause if it wasn't on the computer and 14 they had to wait for an hour to get it on the computer and 15 somebody would put one in or something?
16 Q
No.
I was thinking more in terms of actually 17 altering the documents themselves; have you ever seen that?
18 A
Not that I can remember.
Not richt' now.
l 19 Q
I think I've already asked ycu this, but I want to l
20 make sure I've got it one more time:
kl 21 Do you know of any instances where anybody destroyed l
NI
- p docuey,ts?
22 23 A
Yes, sir.
24 Q
Tell me about that?
A d
.. q f 25 A
You mean just destroyed them?
i 91 1
Q Destroyed docuuments that shouldn't have been
- l."
'. c 2
destroyed?
3 In other words, I know you said you had copies, 4
where you were supposed to have two copies, you would make 5
more because you used them; there were more going out in the 6
field and I understand about those.
7 But do yo.. know of any instances where peccle 8
destroyed documents they shouldn't have?
9 A
Um, yuh, the document that was destroyed that 10 shouldn't have been destroyed.
11 Q
Give me an example?
12 A
Well, when they pulled out-- when Unit I which
(
~
13 was nearly completed, a lot of Unit 1 documents were p
14 destroyed and they shojldn't have been; because Unit 1 isn't
\\()
15 completed right now.
hk 16 Q
What kind of documents?
17 A
All the CMCs, DCAs, blueprints and everything.
18 We had orders to get rid of them.
19 Q
What systems?
20 A
All Unit 1, all Unit 1, except the 2000 -- they're
~
21 numbered, like, 2600 or 2601, 2603 something like that, you l
22 know.
23 Q
The originals of these you're talking about that 24 were destroyed, are the originals in the vault?
l 25 A
The originals are kept on microfilm.
i
s 8
92 1
Q The originals were destroyed in the field?
C.;
s'. -
2 A
Our copies are destroyed.
t 3
MR. IPPOLITO:
I'd like to understand this a little 4
bit better.
5 Were these drawings or documents that_were desrroyed 6
do you know as to whether or.not they were as to completed t
7 systercs ?
8 In other words, that system has been, you know, 9
c'onstructed, QC guy did his job; and that was the end of it.
10 They turned it over to TUCO and said, here is a finished 11 room.
N N
U Do you know that?
j l
~
13 THE WITNESS:
They were never turned ove-14 We..were just told that they're not going to be l
~
i 15 working in Unit 1 right now; part of Unit l's complete, so l
{16 if you have the files, throw them away.
And the next day i
t;17 people would be in asking for them.
They'd need them --
l l
- 18 instrumentation would need them to work on them.
I N
MR. IPPOLITO:
What would you do in that case?
20 THE WITNESS:
We had to go back and do a whole 21 lot of work.
22 MR. IPPOLITO:
Recreate the files?
i D
THE WITNESS:
Yuh.
24 MR. IPPOLITO:
You still had the. vaults, in other go, GI-8 words, they had their copy?
93 I
1 Is that right?
Or the comeuter still had informa-l W
2 tion on the computer?
3 THE WITNESS:
So we put the packages back together.
i 4
MR. IPPOLITO:
So you pushed the button on the i
i 5
computer and said, okay, here's what I need out of that j
6 package; and then you go to the right place and get copies 7
of all of these and you make them up again?
l 8
THE WITNESS:
Um-huh.
\\
j 9
BY MR. GRIFFIN:
[
10 Q
Because your --
y) 11
\\'
s i
2
}
13 But if we find in the future those events are i
I i
l 14 something we..need to pursue, then we will not hesitate to
\\
15 recentact you on those.
16 There is one part of your testimony, one part of 17 your affidavit, relating to the events leading to your i
l i
18 termination that I would like to clarify:
i l
19 You indicated you had a wreck in the parking lot.
20 And you indicated security checked your truck.
And you 1
indicated that they found an old house blueprint under the d
front seat.
Was this blueprint, was this your personal property?
M A
Yes.
-r; l
r Lh*
25 Q
Okay.
94 j
t 1
Now, you indicated before we started today that 2 'a 2
you had some other information you wanted to talk about.
j 3
I want you to feel free at this point to either explain 4
thi.gs we've already talked about -- if we didn't get it done right, asked you everything that you think we should have; 5
6 or if there are any new items that you have that you'd like f
i to tell us about; you can do so'at this time?
l 7
A One was the incident where the guy came in and
{
8 threw that deleter.
He did that a. couple of times.
And I l
8
't i
had to call his general foreman and ask him to please make 10 II him stop, you know.
12
- Q What was his name?
13 g
14 And there was another one I've forgotten.
15 We had a subsatellite down at pipe department and 16 they was just allowed to look at the blueprints there in the t
cffice; they were not allowed to take them out in the field.
17 18 And they was taking them out in the field.
And 1
19 that was a violation of procedure.
20 Q
Who did this?
21 A
Craft.
l 22 The subsatellite was releasing the documents out of Q
23 procedure, also?
24 A
Yuh.
gp
~ :3.>
1
95 1
It was just a little window, and they could take
.:,~,.
' A' 2
them -- the documen~ts -- back into their office; and they'd 3
run out in the field and look at them real fast and walk righ:
4 back to 306 to get the rest of what they needed.
5 Q
Okay.
6 Did the person in the subsatellite realize that 7
this was taking place?
8 A
Well, I had to substitute in the subsatellite a 8
couple of times and I knew it was taking place.
I had to 10 tell them then that you couldn't take them out in the 11 field.
You can tell, you know, they've been out in the field 12 because they've been folded up, stuck in their back pockets,
/~ -
13' real dirty, everything.
14 You can tell the.y've been out in the field.
i 15 Q
They are only supposed to stand there and read 16 them, and then give them back to you?
i 17 A
They could take them into their adjourning office, 18 but it's not supposed to go outside the door.
l l
l a
They're supposed to go back to the satellite and l
20 get the package there.
21 Q
Do you believe you were -- the ultimate reason that 22 you were terminated was because of your adhe ence to the 23 procedures?
r.-
A Um-hth.
'g:
Q You think that's wh you?
m
l 96 A
That, because4lgggggtaught me -- like I said, I
"~; ;
come from craft.
And1lEllg come from DCC.
That's two 3
completely different things.
SolllgpDandIhelpedeachother.
I told her what 5
I knew about craft and she told me what she knew about DCC.
l 6
And so we worked together pretty closely together.
And we l
had ever since July.
8 And qllgg believed in following procedures.
9 I mean, if they wanted her to break procedures, she wanted 10 a three part memo saying, stating that they had her do this.
11 And I followed procedures and I tried to get my n
girls to follow procedures.
13 Q
Did you also ever get three part memos to violate 14 procedures or go outside procedures or exceptions from
~
procedures?
16 A
They just verbally told me this.
17 Q
That they wanted you to?
18 A
Um-huh, violate procedures.
19 Q
And what was your response when your supervisors 20 told you to violate procedures?
21 A
I did.
Q Youdidwhathetoldyou--orylllggtoldyou?
A What told me.
24 g.5,.;
Q Are you talking about instances other than the 25 one we talked about earlier?
I
97 I
A Yuh.
I b.4 2
Any that g told me -- anythin M told me l
3 to do, I did.
And, becausehlllgyknewwhatwasagainst procedure 4
s and what wasn't more so than I because she'd been there 6
five years, where I'd only been a year.
I Q
Andhowmanytimesdidlllll>tellyoutodothings 8
that were in violation of procedure?
8 A
Right offhand I can't think of anything that 10 she might comeupandsay,9llggpsaidlet'sdoso-and-so, 11 you know; but as far as right offthetopoftdEllll$ head comingupandviolatingprocedures,llggggwouldn'tdothat.
13 Q
But in how many instances did she tell you to do 14 something that was a viola, tion of procedures, where she was passing instructions from M 16 Did that come up very often?
Oh,ah,acoupleoftimes;orllggwouldjustcall A
18 on the phone and tell me what to do.,
19 Q
And you followed his instructions even if it was 20 a violation of procedures?
u A
Yes.
Q I want to ask you your opinion, now:
If I go and talk to and I ask him about 24 people who work under his supervision and instructions to them CJ 25 that were in violation of procedures; do you think he will
98 I
admit he on numerous occasions instructed his subordinates
-0 1 2
to violate procedures?
3 A
I don't think he'd going to admit to it.
4 0
You think he would be untruthful to me?
5 A
I'm pretty sure.
I don't think he's. going to tell 6
you that.
I He might admit to it; yuh; I told some people to 8
violate procedures.
But he's not going to tell you everythinc 8
no.
10 I thought there was another incident where I needed 11 some welding procedures WPSs, and I was on distribution for U
14 and I was supposed to be on distribution for 18.
-(
And I had to go t h and --
13 14 Q
Who is h 15 A.
He's right across from 16 office; he's way up there.
17 And he gave me a real hard time just because I had 18 to get his okay to add to my distribution.
I also had to take 18 him oct to the field and show him my welding procedure 20 i
books and how many I needed and who they were for and i
21 everything.
i 22 And he threw a real big fit.
And come to find out, l r
23 I was allowed to get up to 64 of them.
And he just come down 24 on me real hard on the procedures, wanting to know where they
. fr..,
q::7
~
25 were going and what I was doing with them and everything.
1 Q
Do you have anything else?
' c.
2 A
Not that I can think of right now.
3 Q
Okay.
4 Is it okay as we pursue our inspection and our 5
investigation, if we contact you?
6 I am still mindful of the terms of the confiden-7 tiality.
8 Is it okay if we contact you if we need further 9
information to ask more questions?
10 A
Yes.
11 MR. IPPOLITO:
Can we take a two-minute recess?
U (Recess) 13 MR. GRIFFIN:
Back on the record.
14 lEggEg$, have I o,,r any other NRC representative 15 offered you any rewards in return for your statement?
16 THE WITNESS:
No, sir.
i i
17 MR. GRIFFIN:
Have you given this statement freely j
18 and voluntarily?
i 19 THE WITNESS:
Yes.
l 30 MR. GRIFFIN:
Is there anything further you would 21 like to add for the record?
22 THE WITNESS:
Not that I can think of right now.
E3 MR. GRIFFIN:
Do you 'have anything, Tom?
24 gy MR. CARPENTER:
No.
e
.w 25 MR. GRIFFIN:
If you're content, I'm content.
1 Okay, thank you vary much, es Q.~-
2
-(Whereupon, at 4:09 p.m.,
Thursday, April 5, 3
1984, the interview was concluded.)
1 4
5 i
i 6
i 7
l 8
9 i
10 j
11 12 i~
l,C 13
> q%
14 O
15 l
16 17 18 19 l
' 30 1
N I
J g
.Q.
M::.
i a
I i
+
j 1
i i
'(
2 (J.-
This is to certify that the attached proceedings before the 3
NRC CotG1!SSION 4
In the matter of:
CONFIDENTIAL INTERVIEW 3
Date of Proc ~eeding:
April 5, 1984
~
Place cf Proceeding:
Arlington, Texas were held as herein appears, and that this is the original transcript for the file of the Commission, to James R.
Burns, Jr.
it Official Reporter - Typed s
12
.T i
\\t 3
j W'lf7W k,
[YW
/
Of ficiad Reporter - Si,gnature d
'/
/
i 15 16 17 e-is kA A-l 2o 21 22 i
i l
23 t
24 th l %+: '-
s 25 TAYLOE ASSOCIATES nzctsTrato Peortss QNAt. REPORTERS i
NCRFcLK. VIRGINIA i
- '. ' f:k %&.L*Lf ?y;t*:6y4(~4;f!f.A.*ARQ ?3.?;$.Mid_VG.%$.I$~_@,%Q,i>r.t _ : ? w 2-nYy : _
c e."\\,e er,,
g 1
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
- i DCP-3 13 05/09/84 f t j f 10
{~
Date 8-8"8 N
TITLE:
ORIGINATOR
/
CPSES DOCUMENT REVIEWED BY: A4s/ -
Date CONTROL PROGRAM QA
/U D <fl
- I Da:e Iuwu QA APPROVED BY:
Da:6; CONSTRUCTION PROJECI MGR nd
/ n 1
o.1 TABIE m CONTENTS g
WR.
1.0 REFERENCES
OR l
(RUA.
IIM
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE l
EN INEEllNG USE ONLY o
3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 REPRODUCIION AND DISTRIBUTION I
((
[ gMg 3.1.1 Scooe of Controlled Document s
- nlY J l
3.1.2 Controlled Distribution l
77 i':='='
'w l
f 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.4 Special Distribution 3.2 REGIPT AND ACCOUNTING Fm CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS 3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Docments J
3.2.2 Account ing for Controlled Document s i
3.3 MAINTENANCE AND SINAGE W DOCUMENIS 3.3.1 Maintenance o f Document s 3.3.2 Storage of Documents i
3.4 DISTRIBUIION T DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, 2 BYDRO PAGAES l
j 3.5 DISTRIBUTION & DOCUMENIS Fm PROCUREMENT USE l
4.0 ATTACHMENTS No. 1 Design Change Iog No. 2 DCC Drawing Distribution (Summary) l No. 3 Document Routing to the Document Control Center Shee.
No. 4 Controlled Distributuion Request f
No. 5 Document Distributuion Log No. 6 Computer Update List 1
~
A (3-4 aswww F0'A-85-55
~-
.:.d :., -; * : Vx y -- :' " - '
- Y -W4SWJYh.& Nn.:b.'r:.
- -~.ja &: w 4 Ti I
- 6. ';
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1 Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-ocp-3 Rev.
18 This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the following pages with the attached:
Page 3 of 10 6 of 10 7 of 10 9 of 10 Q
10 of 10 Reviewed by:
i.
SV/ W
\\eu A C / d ?E'/f
<- +
y aty Originpr g/
Date '
f wn
/A urance W
[ON/
\\.
- / S$'
' Approved by:
i TUGC0 Quality Agsurance
- Date, r
uM A
[ /h 05/11/84 uctioFProject Manager Date Effective Date w
- l v.
_...;....,c - c u ;,s;U*.,.:_- ~1:_ f.+ - ::r.A M%WMM:Mik:s -r-i C,ria 'hu: tG :r in.,s e -;E;.;inki -
a BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EF7ECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE -
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 2 o f 10 1.0 REFERFNCES 1.1 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manual 1.2 35-1195-CP-CPM 6.3 1.3 35-1195-DE I-9 1.4 3 5-1195-DCP-7 1.5 35-1195-DEI-7 1.6 3 5-1195-DEI-10 1.7 35-1195-DE I-11 35-1195-DEI-12 1.8
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the docuent control i
activities at the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES).
2.2 SCOPE This procedure addresses the activities of and responsibilities fior l
the control, receipt, reproduction, distribution, storage and retrieval of construction and design docuents generated at the site or received by the Document Control Center (DCC).
Instructions, j
procedures, and/or drawings shall be readily available for use at locations where the prescribed activities are performed, and for use i
by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI).
3.0 PROGDURE 3.1 REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION 3.1.1 Scope of Controlled Doement s DCC will be responsible for the reproduction of controlled doements including, but not limited to, drawings, specifications, design changes, procedures, instructions, and construction hold notices.
O t
w^'
l
=. _. -.
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFTECTIVE
'g CPSES NUMBEB.
RE71SION DATE PAGE -
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 1 e ir in 3.1.1.1 controlled docments shall be distributed to the satellites and the several control numbered recipients on the Distribution Routing Control List (DRCL). This in accordance with the Distribution Summary (Attachment 2) which is prepared by the DCC Supervisor and lists the satellite control nubers and the recipient control nebers, the doctanent number and quantities distributed. DRCL's are prepared in accordance with Construction Procedure DEI-7.
Additions or deletions to current distribution may be requested by file custodians or satellite personnel by submittal'of the
" controlled distribution request" form (Attachment 4) to the DCC Computer Distribution Group. A " Computer Update List" (Attae.hment 6) will be submitted daily to the Computer Distribution l.
Group to reflect controlled docments and quantities reproduced in the satellites.
Design changes are distributed to holders of affec~ted controlled documents.
Issuance and receipt of design changes are docmented on the Docment Distribution log (Attachment 5) by signature or initial of the file custodian.
O 3.1.1.2 Distribution of B&R initiated construction procedures is in accor-dance with the "Doceent Routits to the Document Control Center Sheet" (Attachment 3) which is received with the procedure from the Pro-cedures Department.
3.1.1.3 Distribution to TUGC0 Operations' and TUCCO Nuclear Ooerations Support's Doceent Control Centers shall be controlled under their respective procedures STA-306 and NOC-102. This shall include Aperture cards, bluelines, Ierox copies, DCA's, OfC's Specifications and other requested documents.
These items shall bear identifying markings to indicate thsy were in fact issued to TUGCo Operations Document Control Centers.
TUGCo Operation's Doctanent Control Centers shall be fully responsible for proper controls of these docments.
All doctanents with the stamp shown below will be under the control of TUGCo's Document Control Center:
DISTRIBUTED BY TUSCO OPERAll0NS DCC DCP-3 Rev. 18 DCN #1 05/11/84 Sheet 2 of 6
.. ~.
.S BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCIDURI DTECTIVE
'Lt CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE -
PAGE -
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 4 o f 10 3.1.2 Controlled Distribution i
3.1.2.1 Controlled documents [1l be idenH U=d by the red " controlled copy"
~
stamp (shown below) with the recipient number in the shaded area of the stamp.
C 35-1195 fk en o
TcogW J
Ncta: Vaulted redlined BOP hanger packages which are removed from the vault for rework do not require a' red control stamp.
3.1.2.2 Upon receipt of project or design doceents, the DCC Supervisor shall review the document to ensure the docunent has been properly
.s
'Q approved for use. Docunents not approved or not released for use shall not be issued for construction, but may be issued as uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3.
3.1. 2.3 G&H Design drawings must have a numerical revision designation of a least "0" for issuance. Drawings without numerical revision designations or with alpha revision designations shall be considered preliminary drawings and shall not -be issued for construction. These docunents may be issued as uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3.
NOIE:
If G&H approval letter revises the status of a preliminary drawing to a TUSI Status 1, it may be issued as a controlled drawing.-
3.1.2.4 Controlled docunents affected by design change documentation shall be stamped as follows:
THIS DOCUMENT AFFECTED BY DESIGN CHANGE
~
l S *h
~&, a. ' - -
a.
- -y.+;v. u,
a.
._. ;m i
<'s BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE
. [;2 CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE -
I i
l JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 5 o f 10 3.1.2.5 Revisions to documents including but not limited to, design changes and document change notices, which affect other controlled doctments, shall be distributed to the same control recipients receiving the affected document. Revisions to these types of documents shall be processed in the same manner as the original issue.
3.1.3 Other Distribution
- j 3.1.3.1 Docu'nents may be distributed upon request by authorized site personnel for purposes other than production (physical construction) 1 l
or QC inspection activities. The DCC Supervisor shall maintain a rostes of authorized personnel. DCC shall maintain no responsibility for revision status of doctanents distributed in this manner.
3.1.3.2 Doctanents distributed in this manner shall be stamped "FGL OFFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" as follows:
O FOR 0 lCE AN)
ENG N EER.NG lSE ON _Y 3.1.3.3 These doctaments shall be stamped per 3.1.2.4 ("THIS DOCUMENT AFTECTED BY DESIGN CHANGES") when applicable. DCC shall maka available a list of design changes upon request.
1 3.1.3. 4 Doctments may be upgraded to controlled status by including the I
provisions o f 3.1.2.-
3.1.4 Special Distribution "Special Distribution Schedules" (SDS) will fbra the basis of all limited engineering doctment distribution requirements. (See DEI - 10) 3.1.5 Transmittal of Engineerina Doctanentation 3.1.5.1 BRHL's will be issued to engineering organizations.as controlled doctaments per paragraph 3.1.2.
These drawings can be issued to construction organizations per paragraph 3.1.3 Doctments issued per paragraph 3.1.3 will be current upon issue only. It shall be the responsibility of the user or holder to assure current
- s...
revision control.
[
El1-
. _. n. -. -.
a.c._.._.
t BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE I
CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE.
PAGE -
I JOB 35-1195 05/09/84 6 of to nep_3 is 3.1.5.2 Docuents issued per paragraph 3.1.2 may be used to transmit information to engineering organizations by copying. These docuents shall be stamped "FOR WFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" and in addition the " CONTROL STAMP" shall be crossed out.
l 3.2 RECEIPT AND ACCOUNTING FOR CONTR0 LIED DOCUMENIS 3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Docuents
'3.2.1.1 With the exception of the several existing control nebers, Satellite.
Document Control Centers are the file custodians.
Prior to interface with the crafts and disciplines in the distribution of any controlled doceents, all personnel shall have completed both of the following requirements:
1.
Document Control Orientation Class 2.
Passing grade (15 of 16 correct) on DCC test which is based
'i on a thorough knowledge o f DCP-3.
.a Docunentation supporting such qualification shall be maintained by DCC. Records for maintainance of qualification are retained by the Training Department (for departments other than DCC) in accordance l
with CP-CPM 2.2.
l 3.2.1.2 Design change docuentation shall be distributed to and maintained at the same location as the affected documents. The "Open Report" from the TNE Design change computer data base provide the logs where all Gibbs and Hill and vendor doceentation are concerned.
l This is also true of specifications. All other logs are maintained l
manually. No other design changes need be distributed, posted, or I
maintained in these areas.
If the design change received is the first issue against t'ha affected doceent, the satellite or control amber l
shall stamp controlled copies of the affected document (s) with the design change indicator stamp, shown in 3.1.2.4, make a logsheet l
(Attachment 1), as applicable, for the affected document, and note the design change nuber on the logsheet.
Computerized design change log sheets will be issued weekly for drawing l
I documents on extended check out. Updates may ocurr during the l
l interia should a design change be issued.
The design change document shall also be stamped 91th'the l
satellite or department control number in red ink when issued l
with a controlled drawing. When issued with drawing or docuents stamped with the " Office and Engineering Use Only" stamp, design 1
changes will also be stamped in red with the " Office and Engineering Use only" stamp. Design changes which have been reproduced and bear a black control ntsaber or " Office and Engineering Use only" stamp are not valid documentation.
DCP-3 Rev. 18 DCN #1 05/11/84 Sheet 3 of 6 f -
~.=M.
f
-w BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EITECTIVE C
CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE.
PAGE JOB 35.-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 7 o f 10 NOTE:
Classification of hangers will be governed by the current revision of DCA-5021 which will not be posted in the design change logbooks 7CC will stamp controlled copies of all large bore. hanger drawings with the following stamp:
CHECK CURRENT RIMS 10N oF DcA-5021 FOR MANGER CLASSIFICATION.
NorE:
Small bore hanger logs shall reflect all open and incorporated design changes but not drawing revisions.
EXCLUSION: Design change information shall be distributed to organizations holding the affected documents.
The design change shall be reviewed by responsible personnel to ensure it does not affect the discipline's work activities. Where they do affect the activities, they shall be posted and maintained as discussed above.
.gq)
If they do not affect the work activities, the changes need not be posted or maintained.
3.2.1.3 A record of whom a doctanent was checked out to shall be maintained by the satellite and control number recipients. Doctanentatica issued to the craft for daily work activities shall be returned at the end of-the shift to the distribution source. Upon receipt __
of a revised _doctament, the superceded doctanent shall be retrieve.d_
ag, laced with the current doctament. Superceded doctanents may be retained by the holder. If retained the drawinge shall be stamped " VOID" and/or "FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY".
NOIE: Document (controlled) may be checked out to persons in the disciplines or groups for extended periods of time.
It is mandatory however, that the signout log list the name, group, location and telephone extension of the copyholder so that the
~
doctanent may be updated should it go out of revision or a design change be entered against the doctanent.
It is the satellites' obligation to maintain this update. Doctanents checked out for statusing purpose need not be accompanied by the affected designScharges. Computerized. design change log sheets for statusing purpose documents will be upon request.
i 3.2.1.4 If the doctanent being received is a DCN, tha satellite / file custodian must mark the DCN number on the cover sheet of the affected procedure and file the DCN with the procedure.
If the m
DCN replaces the cover sheet, the old cover sheet with approval signatures shall be retained.
05/11/84 sheet 4 of 6 DCP-3 Rev. 18 DCN #1 w IE.. -
,a
BROWN 3r ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EF7ECTIVE
- ,' Q, CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 3 of to NOTE
- When a new revision of a document is distributed a new updated log sheet will be distributed with that document. Upon receipt of the new log sheet from the
.DCC, file custodians should replace the old log sheet in their Design Change Iag Book with the new one, and discard the old log sheet.
3.2.1.5
" Mail-out" distribution is made by letter accompanied by DRCL.
3.2.2 Accountitu for Controlled Doceents 3.2.2.1 All satellites and the several control ntsabers will be the " subject of monitorig by an independent monitortug team. This team shall report to the Supervisor of DCC. This group shall monitor all controlled doctament files to ensure that all applicable design doctaments are current and that design change logs, manuals and computers show the current approved and issued design change info rmatio n.
All monitoring will be a continuing operation -
satellite to satellite.
.q 3.2.2.2 Monitoring shall be performed by using the "DCC Recipient List" V
issued to each satellite and the several control numbers by the
__..- central DCC, which wil1 indicate:
1.
Those documents they are shown as having 2.
Appropriate revision of each document 3.
The utsaber of copies of the doctament they have.
To monitor the design change logs, the monitoring team will compare the Master DCC logs with satellite and control ntsaber logs. When that has been done, the physical design change files shall be checked at each file location.
l 3.2.2.3 The monitoring team group leader shall write a memo to the DCC Supervisor indicating the monitorig activity has been completed and noting any discrepancies and corrective action taken. These monitoriq reports shall be maintained in the DCC central office.
3.2.2.4 When a controlled" document package" or doctament is checked out to a craftsman or a task force paper flow group they become responsible fbr its security.
In the event the package is lost, or misplaced, the DCC satellita from which the document package was logged out should be notified as l
quickly as possible. The satellite supervisor shall notify the craft superintendent or department head of the loss and request that appropriate action be taken.
[
'~ "
i
_L
_.w a:
.e
.w__.
A BROWN & ROOT, l'NC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE
%/
NUMBER REVISION DATE.
PAGE -
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 9 o f 10
.. ~. -
To obtain a " replacement" copy of a controlled document the file custodian / satellite supervisor must complete a " Controlled Distribution Request" form (Attachment 4) specifying docuent neber, revision and nsaber of copies to be replaced. This re(uest must be signed and submitted to the DCC Computer Distribution Group. A replacement DRCL will then be issued to the Docuent Reproduction Group for processing.
3.2.2.5 If for any reason, a superceded document is retained, the face of the document must be stamped or marked " VOID".
When no longer required, superceded documents should be destroyed.
EXCIdSION:
Drawings issued in accordance with paragraph 3.4 and drawings issued for use in Hanger Packages are not' j
subject to the aforementioned audits.
DCC will maintain a file for DRCL's with signed acknowledgement by File Custodians verifying actual receipt of controlled doctaments.
A cross-check will be performed to ensure receipt of doctaments and the appropriate discipline will be notified of any discrepancias.
- 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents The DCC shall maintain a file of current document revisions and
)
as-built drawings as they are received. Additionally, a listing of all such documents and a list of all active changes shall be maintained.
l t
'3.3.2 Storane of Doctments Project Record. files are stored by the DCC. These include, but are not limited to, specifications, procedures, correspondence, manuals, drawings, aperture cards, and silver microfiche originals.
3.4 DISTRIBUTICH & DOCUMENTS TO TRAVEIZR, HYDRO, INSPECTION, OR WORK PACKAGES.
i.
Doctanents required for fabrication, installation and/or inspection may be issued for inclusion into a traveler, hydro, inspection report, or work package. The doctanent shall be identified as being part of the package and that it cannot be used independently of the -
package by stating on the document "This docssment shall be used only in conjuction with Operation Traveler #
~
4 DCP-.3 Rev. 18 DCN #1 05/11/84 Sheet 5 of 6
_=_
_-~
. _ _ _, ~,_
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE 3
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 10 o f 10 NOTE:
For packages, other than travelers, the package identi-fication and number will be entered instead of the traveler number.
It shell be the responsibility of the organization controlling the package to ensure the current docuent revision neber is referenced
~
in the package.
EECLUSION: Traveler packages containing drawings which have weld nebers assigned by Welding Engineering, and all Banger Packages, are excluded from the aforementioned control alternative.
3.5 DISTRIBUTION O? DOCUMENIS FOR PROCUREMENI USE Drawings, specifications and/or design changes used for trans-mittal to vendors shall be issued as "Fcr Office & Engineering Use Only."
It shall be the responsibility of the organization controlling the procurement package to ensure the current doceent revision is transmitted.
l w
05/11/84 Sheet 6 of 6 DCP-3 Rev. 18 DCN #1 y,
e e
m BROWN & ROOT INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE NUMBER RE7ISION DATE PAGE
,,)
CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 1 of 1 ATTACEMENI 1 DESIGN CHANGE LOG (Typical)
OS$
5eY M,)/
ef s s. :r-;..:
syc ses c.1 e
e-=r.s.
%a e
2 t
i e 6 f
I 8
- I 4
i 6
6_
I i
t i
i l i t
i e_
l t
I a i e
I f
4 I
I t
4 8
8 i
e i
i i 6 8
e i
l 8
6 6 6 t
6 i
l 0
1 I 6 1
8 6_
e i
l 4 6 i
l i
t t
i b
t t
e
- l a
a i
e i r i
i i
6 i
a i f
I
('5 t_
i i
e b e
i e
Q, l
1 6
I P
e e
a 8
I a
6 6 6
I I
l l
l l
t I
i e
~ *-
~*
l 6
I t
i 6
e i
i i
I t
t t
t f
i i
1 l
t 4
'l a
a f L i
6
!~
e l
0 h
l 0
8 i
e i
a 4 a
e 6
e I
a 6
I I
i i l I
e l
i I
a 6
1 6 &
_t __. _
1 0
.4 i
I t
e 6
t - - -.
- e
,f -
3 J
.W l
t 4
6 e
i e
e s'
I 1
8 I I I
I e
e i
a a
e 4
t I i
i 8
a a
t I
e I
i
~f f l 1
i a
I i
l i I
a e
e e e
. g i
t i t e
e
- e h -=
g I
P g,
m
m
- mw _
BROWN & ROOT, D C.
PROCIDURE EFFICTIVE c,
';-)
CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE-JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 i og 1 ATTACEMENT 2 I
.I DCC DRAWING DISTRIBUTION
(
SUMMARY
)
?
g g
l DATE : 05/08/84 DCC DRAWING DISTRIBUTION i
DCT DCN~
SHEET REV
. TSAS 2323-AS-031:
l
~
TIT:.E t PROTECTIVE.CDATINGS MEDIUM
'. ?
CRIGIN t
.b c i
' - -. '.,.'; *.i - ' -- '.
~. " -
.. ' 4 4,
~
g 57. 1.
l t 202 1..
211 1
.~
I f k C.
302 3.
i; 304 30s 2-
, * ^
. 308 4.
.s.
i.,
l
.,.?
. ~,
~. ',.
1
'e.,,.,.,'.
- y.,*'....
=
e
- ".t s
l s.r..
.#*4
'g C
- i r
l 3.
.}
~ s s
r I
J e> <ee
.=.
./
,q.
1 I
BROWit & ROOT, DC.
PROCEDURE EFFICTIVE CPSES NUMBER RE7ISION DATE PAGE 05/09/84 i og t JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 ATTACHMENT 3 M*ENT !.0.:
(GesaIZATICs)
G HANDt.DN1 InsTmences:
.a i.-
a ir O ruacat ' = d58'r5**$*
p, C q fe approval (W mly)
." " C.Others gtsTRIBUTI2:
N D
g
.w McIAL, DisTRic CRs:
8 Routes q gr pecates Acane.tesgement i-
'?"
Data f
s./
i i _
1 I
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE I
h.;
CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 i af i ATTACEMENT 4 mcosmwmie neouesr N1'ljis7 N as W E E D,Y AOctTIO8eAA
_RWLACSASIT RETURN o.a. =T REV.
InasSSR OW
"'---Z_^""
00CuesENT4AAustess asussetA PAsafe.
88 0.
COMS WWWOR OaOst e STATUS l
I m
~ ~ ~
l I
t l
a I
l
- Pee Cussoman's sipuesse soeussed ese as sessanes w sammann usTsucTicsssTo neeJesTom:
- 1. Fu as puesums
& muuan veems came
& pus esse & rena Casse em amuseus emesma nr m
,w
= __.s :.,. w.... _*% -2. y.,m..., ;.:.. x,.,,.,.._,,,,._.,_...,.
,,w d e._ -
t BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PEDCEDURE EFFECTIYZ C.,
CPSES NUMBER.
RIVTSION DATE PAGE' JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 1 or i ATTACHMENT 5 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LOG 1
season armsamm ins
~
o et 3IYS-as esin tm.-
navisk ~
~
oseness affected (If aeolica6tel i
Accipient Os striessie:s anseer eP testpasit.1 pam Caen Mts em tog
. )
l G
- s.
g 6
og
~
O e
G
.P
-I d
e E
sr. -
.m
-m
^
_.. _:,... r.na.., wnt.. _ w.- :.s. _g:s; :.w.-en.w,n,. ;.,.,_
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE DTECTIVE n.
(.)
CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE' PAGE' JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 18 05/09/84 i og i ATTACHMENT 6 (AftLLITE
- 047Cl
~CCWPUWR UPDATE LIST-
~
- owoc auwace-tatt ADO \\QELEE)
~ CGMtNT3 =
I i -
t t
)
i I
l 8
I i
l t
I i
i i
i i
l i
{.-g i
i i.
s,-
j l
1 t
t I
t I
i i
i l
I
}
l l
1 i
i I
4 i
i i
i t
i l
i i
I I
l 1
Mmm
(CRAFT)
OPERATING / ADMINISTRATIVE-GUIDELINES FOR DCC. SATELLITES g
g I
~
f&
i DCC i
1.s.0eu <., u au.a.
0
.ar Gau.,eP.s.a. -n.au.C 1
0a l
i l DRAWINGS !
! DESIGN CHANGES l' u
REVISIONS REQUEST (('OR TR4/ELERS REVl$10NS NEW NEW' DWG S ISSUES
~
%&f> ksAnter1WWY i
DAILY LONG c
EO<
TEI \\8v8 %OkA[ )
t fell out Cat atout$r PG A v & vthify stouttste
& LOG esego saf ftteig
& a(Pfaf STEPS 1 SwC'S & asDfk esuutta CF 00Cuwtati ang on 900ak paa mEvatessas
.. COPEL leavitia 3.ast 10 PaCam6gs ass GP Siamess n'===use I N#
g g'aa, g[gY NM
- d. s.
attas0WE W0s0 SwE
& ACCESS Comaruyga 10 f acts int.
IGND esoLDEa S taasef a 3 ACC855 CMitse ton Ot4N aresesasts saamasse e eN
& aN1dal Set'uf ging
& aues entw Of Sagas Ca8G(
DilaGN CataWs.
1 apes to oc enesogat
%' i stana SaPaCf 0N SiauP.
8 g Mg paCaa6C wetM p
3 Ausessstw MSaGM
- 4. Assfues t o C fimues f at t s i vadiey aivassons er 4.
a,esuff 70s PF CMA E2 LOGS ano g
sutw GeuG Sur0aff W a DaawsNCE at M sit e.
ur0Alf PalmaGE.
g.aCKaGE eftMstl P
06 Sagas CHa886($ P(A E gas 1Em a0Ctudset asumenta.
4 es5ut DocuwEmys 30 sanGg assess 0TE One
- 4. LOG Out Dw& To as(W LOG.
maME. Esit M5eDff AN0 0TV.
htQut 51( A.
SE$sr.ee CasahGE LOG.
I 38M8-4 AEST M 04 Stater Iss Coasputin.
1 DCC misPonsaastst y
" ~
S v(nafV ConfEssIS goes eLS enJurassSL
- 6. IS$ut owe 4 eaavE sag #ege Snes sethE.
884WE CUST00 san SaGmica.
- "I" # "#""IE
& seawg AECarsENT Ss6m 70s.
& ef E4Cusaf set 85 880F g,e g'g g
70s A(We$eOst I ar paaLY CHECR0uf,400 E,",",
,,I,I, 0u5 6 Wesesf Y CONT 4NIS pg pg gg gggyg g gH,eu 4
.,,)
PuCEm tt5 7 IF atOutSrt0 00CuwtnI
[ '
(OmaatseG)e$ CManGEO 3
BN CuMPulih to "d
Sa It t t eIt ~54No Ce t ( e 4GN On ht PUCIMLNI y
g pl*3u(5I 10 CNT 10
.)
Namraw aCCumarc Count 6
Ctasteet asoTE E W dd__
a setCareCarsons ano Pn0Crousers mac 1 vies wa* casiGas CuaeeGa Coururta
- 6. auf Otviatiose 10 inis Cuaar assut parts 8mt 30 tf a(Pn0DuCap see Saf ttLatti gigpong gs us.O wngs a55t wetanG asult et atPomfie 30 a C0seIIeOLLAD COPith ami Catassete paaweeG paCaaGgs, saittLest De oCC StsPEnveE08L aPPD4NEOs
%%=:=.
1.E"&l&==
' = ' " ~ ' ~ " " * ~ ~
~
/
a aCCf 55tB 70 CM(Ca CuanfMI alvtssDee tress eN06Caf L 5 a ktvsL80N
& #0a essCatMescaf S spe 1HE iscascuC cara aPPmOWE S:
IS (se,euuBE Bu GCC.
Da1E-COsefacT OCIG FcN nt:utus soss-SET 6m.
/
__,,_,g_,
y Q h.a:3 hak F A '
s s
.o kI BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
.i
~
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 1 of 8 TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
.. h d.
af, /-f45 9
0 TE REVIEWED BY:
M 9f 0
63 01p g
=
8 8t3 APPROVED BY.
Is Wei f
CQN UCTI0ff OJECT MANAGER
/DATE o.i TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 REFERENCES
a
2.0 INTRODUCTION
r f
[
2.1 PURPOSE l
2.2 SCOPE p
g Y'
3.0 PRQCEDURE
~
3.1 REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION 7
3.1.1 Scoce of Controlled Documents 3.1.2 Controlled Distribution 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.4 Soecial Distributton
[
3.2 RECEIPT AND ACCOUNTI FOR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS 3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Documents 3.2.2 Accounting for ControlleLDocuments 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE Of DOCUMENTS
-trh 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents
%b 3.3.2 Storage of Documents 3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCUREMENT OR HYDR 0 PACKAGES 4.0 ATTACHMENTS No. 1 Design Change Log No. 2 Document Disposition No. 3 Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet No. 4 Controlled Distributuion Request No. 5 Document Distributuion Log
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manual 5
1.2 35-1195-CP-CPM 6.3 H9 1.3 35-1195-DEI-9 1.4 TUQ-552
,4 j
' W 1.5 IM-15260 5:ll:5:88:?
- yqwe
=
4 J
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE
' EFFECTIVE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE,
3 i
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 1 of 8 TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
- see original signature sheet **
DATE CPSES DOCUMENI CONTROL REVIEWED BY:
- see original signature sheet **
PROGRE B&R QA DATE
- see original signature sheet **
l TUGC0 QA DATE APPROVED BY
- sue cricinal sianature shedt **
l CONS"RUCTION PROJECT MANAGER DATE o.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0
' REFERENCES
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1
' PURPOSE 2.2 SCOPE 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1*
REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION 7
~
3.1.1 Scoce of Controlled Documents r.
3.1.2 Controlled Distribution 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.4 Special Distribution 3.2 RECEIPT AND ACCOUNTING R)R CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS 3.2.1 Receipt of Controlled Documents 3.2.2 Accounting for Controlled Documents 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents l
3.3.2 Storage of Documents 3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCUREMENT OR HYDRO PACKAGES 4
4.0 ATTACHMENTS l
No. 1 Design Change Log i
No. 2 Document Disposition i
No. 3 Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet No. 4 Controlled Distributuion Request No. 5 Document Distributuion Log
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manual 1.2 35-1195-CP-CPM 6.3 l'. 3 35-1195-DEI-9 1.4 TUQ-552 l
1.5 IM-15260 1.6 35-1195-DCP-7 1.7 35-1195-bbk~-}0 35-1195-1.8 w
i s'
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER g
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-ocp-3 Rev.
1s.
This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the foklowing pages with the attached:
Page 5 of,8 Page 6 of 8 Page 1 of 1; Attachment 1 Please attach Page 1 of 8 on original signature sh;eet.
l Reviewed by:
~-l
//-E -83 ll
.,r Originator
/
Date
'Trown & Root Quality Assurance Date ff,_(iftl4h
^
Approved by:
Date TUGC0 Quality fssurance
. hp,p
/ ////-P$-
November 16, 1983 Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date
-m-11 %
~
3 JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 4
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-nro,
Rev.is This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the following page(s) with the attached:
Page 4 of 8
~
Reviewed by:
/8 - Y-ff 3 hk
._i.
/0 C #1 Originator
/
Date gc N own & Root Quality' ' Assurance
' Dite f 1 J
Jehh
'b3 Approved by:
TUGC0 Quality Assurance Date l
Ms d/e# /O--//- f' 3 October 11. 1983
)
Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date
~
,.I i
O 4
JOB 35-1195 l
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER
-3 Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-DCP-3 Rev. L.
This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the folloWng pages with the attached:
Page 4 of 8 Page 5 of 8 '
Page 6 of 8 Page 7 of 8
~.
Page 8 of 8 Procedural change on page 4 only.
Pages 5 through 8 show paragraph irovement.
Reviewed by:
f-ZA~d3 h$
Y 9L y
Originator.
/
Date g irown & Root Quality Assurance Date
$7RfAc/F$.5h Approved by:
TUGCEQuality Aspflrance Date uu pl4@7 f[J7//3 September 27, 1983 puctiotvProject Manager Date Effective Date M-
i t
il
~
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 2
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-DCP-3 Rev. 16 This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the following page(s) with the attached:
Page 5 of,8
~=-
Reviewed by:
- Y f-Id3 f
ff 9 h,.,
Originator Date rown & Root Qu~ality Assurance ~
Date 2LR aw#
Approved by.
TUGC0 Quality g/urance Date Construction Project Manager -N/M Seotember 12. 1993 (Mte Date Effective Date m
-7
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Construction Procedure '
DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1
Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195-ncp.a Rev. is This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please repiace the foNowing page(s) with the attached:
Page 7 of 4 l
\\
Reviewed by:
S '* l S ' N 7
J i%
l Crfginator Date gy rown & Root Quality tB ssurance Da e l
Approved by:
jnJGC0 Quatity'Asqurance Date
//w f-N-@3 Auoust 24, 1983 Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date
.- T,
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER
~
REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 2 of 8
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the document control activities at the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES).
2.2 SCOPE This procedure addresses the activities of and responsibilities for the control, receipt, reproduction, distribution, storage and retrieval of construction and design documents generated at the site or received by the Document Control Center (DCC).
Instructions, procedures, and/or drawings shall be readily available for use at locations where the prescribed activities are performed, and for use by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI).
3.0
' PROCEDURE 3.1 REPRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION u-3.1.1 Scoce of Controlled Documents 7
DCC will be resonsible for the reproducifo'n of controlled documents including, but not limited to, drawings, specifications, de'ign changes, s
procedures, instructions, and construction hold notices.
3.1.1.1 Controlled documents (control stamped only)'shall be distributed to the satellites and the several control numbered recipients on the Distribution Routing Control List (DRCL). This in accordance with the Document Disposition (Attachment 2) which is prepared by the DCC Supervisor and lists the satellite control numbers and the several recipient control numbers, the document number and quantities distributed.
DRCL's are prepared in accordance with Construction i
Procedure DEI-7.
Design changes are distributed to holders of affected controlled documents.
I 3.1.1.2 Distribution of B&R initiated construction procedures is in accor-I dance with the " Document Routing to the Document Control Center Sheet" (Attachment 3) which is received with the procedure from the Pro-cedures Department.
._P_ROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER ~ ~
REVISION DATE PAGE
}
CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8-5-83 3 of 8 l
3.1.2 Controlled Distribution 3.1.2.1 Controlled documents will be identified by the red " controlled copy" stamp (shown below) with the satellite and recipient number in the shaded area of the stam CPSES 35-1195 o n.
g g
o k
o, q
e
~
y ggg 3.1.2.2 Upon receipt of project or design documents, the DCC Supervisor shall review the document to ensure the document has been properly approved for use.
Documents not approved or not released for use shall not be issued for construction, btrt may be issued a3 uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3.
I 3.1.2.3 G&H Design drawings must have a numerical revision designation of a least "0" for issuance.
Drawings without numerical revision designations or with alpha revision designations shall be considered preliminary drawings and shall not be issued for construction. These documents may be issued as uncontrolled documents per 3.1.3.
NOTE:
If G&H approval letter revises the status of a preliminary drawing to a TUSI Status 1, it may be issued as a controlled drawing.
3.1.2.4 Tontrolled documents affected by design change documentation shall be stamped as follows:
- rHIS DOCUMENT AFFECTED BY D.ESIGN
. CHANGES 3.1.2.5 Revisions to documents including but not limited to, design changes and document change notices, which affect other controlled documents, shall be distributed to the same control recipients receiving the affected document.
Revisions to these types of dccuments shall be processed in the same manner as the original issue.
I PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 4 of 8 3.1.3 Other Distribution 3.1.3.1 Documents may be distributed upon request by authorized site personnel for purposes other than production (physical construction) or QC inspection activitics.
The DCC Supervisor shall maintain a roster of authorized personnel.
DCC shall maintain no responsibility for revision status of documents distributed in this manner.
3.1.3.2 Documents distributed in this manner shall be stamped "FOR OFFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" as follows:
u-3.1.3.3 These documents shall be stamped per 3.1.W4'("THIS DOCUMENT AFFECTED BY DESIGN CHANGES") when applicable.
DCC shall make available a list of design changes upon request.
3.1.3.4 Documents may be upgraded to controlled status by including the provisions of 3.1.2.
3.1.4 Soecial Distribution "Special Distribution Schedules" (SDS) vill form the basis of all limited engineering document distribution requirements. (See DEI - 10) 3.1.5 Transmittal of Engineering Documentation 3.1.5.1 BREL's will be issued to engineering organizations as controlled documents per paragraph 3.1.2.
These drawings can be iisued' to construction organizations per paragraph 3.1.3 Documents issued per paragraph 3.1.3 will be current upon issue only.
It shall be the responsibility of the user or holder to assure current revision control.
3.1.5.2 Documents issued per paragraph 3.1.2 may be used to transmit information to engineering organizations by copying.
These documents shall be scamped "FOR OFFICE AND ENGINEERING USE ONLY" and.in, addition the
" CONTROL STAMP" shall be crossed out.
3.2 RECEIPT.'AND ACCOUNTING FOR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS 3.2.1 Receiot of Controlled Documents C
PROCEDURE EFFECTlVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVIS10N DATE PAGE CPSES
)
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 5 of 8
- 3. 2.1.1 Satellite Document Control Centers are the file custodians.
Prior 1
to interface with the crafts and disciplines in the distribution of any controlled documents, DCC personnel shall have completed both of the following requirements:
1.
Document Control Orientation Class 2.
Passing grade on DCC test which is based on a thorough knowledge of DCP-3.
Documentation supporting such. qualification shall be maintained by DCC.
Records for maintainence of qualification are retained by the Training Department in accordance with CP-CPM 2.2.
.e 3.2.I.2 Design change documentation shall be distributed to and maintained at the same location as the af fected docu=ents. The satellites shall log design changes as applicable.
No other design changes need be distributed, posted, or maintained in these areas.
If the design change received is the first issue against the affected document, the satellite shall stamp controlled copies of the affected document (s) with design change indicator syamp, shown in paiagraph 3.1.2.4, make a logsheet (Attachment 1), as_ Applicable, for the affected document, and note the design change number on the lopsheet.
NOTE:
Classification of hangers will be governed by the current revision of DCA-5021 which will not be posted in the design change logbooks. DCC will stamp controlled copies of all hanger drawings with the following stamp:
CHECK CURRENT NEVINIUM O f" D CA - S C 21 F'OR HAMf1Fil CJ ftssinCATIONf.
m NOTE:
Small bore hanger logs shall reflect all open and*"
- incorporated design changes but not drawing revisions.
(
EXCLUSION: Design change information shall be distributed to organizations holding the affected documents.
The design change shall be reviewed by responsible personnel to ensure it does not affect the discipline's work activities. Where they do affect.r.!;te activities, they shall be posted and maintained as discussed above.
If they do not affect the work activities, the changes l
need not be posted or maintained.
(
CPSES h
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 6 of 8 I
ti 3.2.1.3 A record of whom a document was checked out to shall be maintained
)
by the satellite.
Documentation issued to the craf t for daily work activities shall be returned at the end of the shift to the distribution source.
Upon receipt of a revised document, the
~
superceded document shall be retreived and replaced with the l
current document.
Superceded documents may be retained by the I
holder.
If retained the drawings shall be stamped "VolD" and i
"FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY".
I t
NOTE:
Documents (controlfed),may be checked out to persons in the disciplines or groups other than the crafts for extended periods of time.
It is mandatory however, that the signout
(
log list the name, group, location and telephone extension F
of the copyholder so that the document may be updated should it go out of revision or a design change be entered against the document.
It is the satellites obligation to, maintain this update.
}il 3.2.1.4 If the document being received is a DCN, the satellite custodian 5
must mark the DCN number on the cover sheet of the affected pre-l cedure and file the DCN with the procedure.
i i
NOTE:
Only when a new revision of a document is distributed
[
will a new updated log sheet be distributed with that
(
document.
Upon. receipt of the new log sheet from the i
DCC, file custodians should replace the old log sheet in their Design Cha'nge Log Book with the new one, and discard the old log sheet.
,(.
.. ~.
7 3.2.1.4
" Mail-out" distribution is made by letter accompanied by ORCL.
[
i
?
3.2.2 Accounting for Controlled Documents l
l l
t 3.2.2.1 All satellites and the several control numbers will be the subject f
of monitoring by an independent monitoring team.
This team shall r
l report directly to the Superv.isor of DCC. This group shah-snonitor i
all controlled document files to ensure that all applicable design i
documents are current and that design change logs, manual and l
computer, show the current approved and issued design change j
information.
All monitoring will be a continuing operation -
J' I
satellite to satellite.
b h
3.2.2.2 Monitoring shall be performed by using the " Recipient Trace" issued
[' l to each satellite and the several control numbers by7he central DC,C, which will. indicate:
( ;
i1 1.
' Those documents they are shown as having.
2.
Appropriate revision of
- document.
l i
l 3.
The number of copies of the document they have.
j i
i I
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVIS10N DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 7 of 8 To monitor the design change logs, the monitoring team will compara i
the Master Dec logs with satellite and control number logs.
When that has been done, the physical design change files shall be checked at each file location.
3.2.2.3 The monitoring team group leader shall write a memo to the DCC Supervisor indicating the monitoring activity has been completed and j
noting any discrepancies and corrective action taken.
These monitoring
)
reports shall be maintained in the DCC central office.
3.2.2.3 When a controlled document is checked out to a foreman or crafts-man, he becomes responsible for its security.
In the event the document is lost, the DCC satellite from which the document was logged out sfould be notified as quickly as possible.
The satellite supervisor shall notify the craf t superintendent in writing of the loss and Taquest that appropriate action be taken.
i To obtain a," replacement" copy of a controlled document the satellite supervisor must complete a " Controlled D,1.stribution Request" form (Att'achment 4) specifying document number, revision and number of copies to be replaced.
This request must be signed and submitted to the DCC Computer Distribution Group. SKr~eplacement DRCL will r
then be issued to the Document Reproduction Group for processing.
3.2.2.4 If for any reason, a sup,erceded document is retained, the face of the document must be stamped or marked " VOID".
When no longer' required,
]
s.uperceded documents should be destroyed.
i EXCLUSION:
Drawings issued in accordance with paragraph 3.4 and drawings issued for use in Ranger Packages are not l
subject to the aforementioned audits.
DCC will maintain a file for DRCL's with signed acknowledgement by File Custodians verifying actual receipt of controlled documents.
A cross-check will be performed to ensure receipt of documents and the appropriate discipline will be notified of any discroyancies.
i 3.3 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 3.3.1 Maintenance of Documents The DCC shall maintain a file of current document revisions and as-built drawings as they are received.
Additionally, a listing of all such documents and a list of all active chaEses shall be maintained.
l
PROCEDURE EFFECTfVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVfSTON DATE PAGE
^
CPSES JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 8 of 8 3.3.2 Storage of Documents Project Record files are stored by the DCC. These include, but are not limited to, specifications, proce'dures, correspondence, manuals, drawings, aperture cards, and silver microfiche originals.
3.4 DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS TO TRAVELER, PROCITREMENT OR HYDRO PACKAGES Documents required for fabrication, installation and/or inspection may be issued for inclusion into a traveler, procurement or hydro package. The document shall be identified as being part of the package and that it cannot be used independently of the package by stating on the document "This document shall be used only in conjuction with Operation Traveler #
NOTE:
For hydro packages, the hydro number shall be entered instead of the traveler number, and the number identified as a hydro test number.
NOTE:
For procurement packages, the bid / purchase order nunber shall be entered instead of the tfaveler nu=ber, and the' number identified as bid /purchye order number.
It shall be the responsibility of the organization controlling the package to ensure the current docu=ent revision number is referenced in the package.
EXCLUSION:
Traveler packages containing drawings which have weld numbers assigned by Welding Engineering, and all Ranger Packages, are excluded from the aforementioned control alternative.
I l
l l
l t
nepa o.o u nev n omm n
~
PROCEDURE EFFECTZVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE 4
CPSES I
JOB 35-1195 DCP-3 16 8/5/83 1 of 1 ATTAcif4ENT 1 DESIGN CHANGE LOG (Typical)
Ir'de#
ces/
! u s., w,i ec
- e. i e-~ Ic
.I
~,,
l.-
1 I
I I I I
I I
- -1 i
I I
i i
i 1
i i
i i 1
.I I
i
'i e
i l i i
I l
l l
1 I
i l I
i i
t I
i i l i
i i
l i
1 i 6 I
I l_
1 I
I I 6 i
l i
j i
i i
l i i
l l
l
- l.
1 I
I 6 i
i e
i i
l I
i f I
I l
i I
i l
i !
1 I
l j
l_
i i
1 4 Ol l
I l
1 l
i P i
I i
i l
l_
i l
I 6 i
l 8
=l l
l i i l
l i
j i
l i $
1 1
l I
i i >
l l
l i.l l l l
l l
l l
l l
L l
l l
I I
I i &
6 I
e l
i i
i k l
i i
j I
6 I
i i
i i
i l
i 1
I l 1
i 1
I 1
1 8 8 8
e i
L i
l I i e
I i
.1 ___ _
i I
.I I
I I
I 1
i i i l
i 1
J l
I l
l 4
i i
i I
[ _
i i
e i i
f f
(
l 1
i i l i
I 8
e i
e i e
3 i
I I
i e
1 l
4 i
i e
i e
e e
i l
1 l
i i l
i 8
I i
i i 1 I
i I
I e
i i i
i l
f I
f
+
9 I
s e
e I
l l
i
....e PROCEDURE l
EFFECTIVE l BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE j
TAGE CPSES i
l JOB 35-1195 I
OCP-3 16 l
8-5-83 1 of 1 ATTAChNENT 2 DOCUMENT DISPOSITION 1
1 CF 2 QCcu.'DT.c::PC1:~~.:n OCM MC? -!!-!197-C:?-07
- * ' * ~ -
I M E?MC U...:N..vC 2.S t 7.*
46 C::E !!!UE AWN L:37 A t?T C::C 23 UE lititrN t. 37 4 gs?
07 04 Oct 001. 400 000 000 00E 001 000 000 C00 09 CCi 002 000 000 000 00!
001 000 000 C00 12 007 Cet C00 000 00C 048 C01 000 0C0 40C tt 012 0 0 '.
400 000 000*
015 401 000 000 000 12 022 001 000 000 000 026 101 000 C00 000 L.T 03
- 002 00C 000 10c 02T " 002 010 00:
400 LL 234 00t 400 OCC 000 CIS 7 001 CCC 0C0 CCO t! 04C 002
- 000 000 000 Cat J CL 000 000. 400 L4 Cat CC; 000 007 C00 014 0C; CCC Occ 000 17 cad Cer Oca Oca eCe 450 40:
00e 000 Ce4 l
'l l
4 e
t I
. zv -
t
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE :
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE j
PAGE CPSES I
JOB 35-1155 DCP-3 l
16 8-5-83 1 Of 1 ATTACENENT 3
- CC: TIT RCtJ7 ".3 *3 DI : :Ctf C:::TX*.'. w. 4.s
~.
(GE:.1137;;;:)
%1:L* :3 lL 4l:*::".3:
C itsettuta Hold n
, C File laly '...o :isvik.rtt:..
u.
O teuta f:r :; : val (7 :ca: ts :aly) 7
~
C Cee.-t 5'
3153:3U7::::
!?t::AL lL%': :::38 M.Aacaist.c r.u ies;icant Acuus ay
.4 u
.no b
t FRCCEURE
! EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER
! RE/ISION l OATE PAGE CP!c.a JOB 35-1195 i
8-5-83 OCP-3 16 r
1 of 1 ATTAC!fiENT 4 -
j l
1 coatao' ac.
cournou.ao oimisuvion neove:7 Nil14$97 I
accmona6 asPtacawsNT
_ a m an non oc: vst on6v DAfg I
Onct satt t
f I
i l
[ pact % arv. l Nuusaa :s NacNasa OcevutNT CaawtNC Nt usta NC.
CO*'85 vtNcca cacta e t A't.3 l
o 1
s j
l 1
I l
A I
i j
i l
i l
l l
I l
l i
[
l
- pa. com n o i.,we,re reeviree en en reewen
.sesTWuCTIONS TO aGQUESTOa-
m'**'**
- 6 W w e f
- f. Pa8 as a, o.e L a,en,n v.*se Case 1 #ws uswo e paa Cae ae an aeosset 6 asset a
m
- I i
e l
t t
4 PROCEDURE E. :ECTIVE SROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION !
DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 i
DCP-3 16 8-5-83 1 of 1 ATTACHNENT 5 l
1 I
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LOG l
e t: :::-t:1.*::.::
1 l
- ,.g.
- O
- 3..:'*
=
l 1
- set.'* :ta: ld t::' * :::' 8 -
88 ' !* :*
1
\\
e 44;* 3 t e.i*.
.; & % ?' 8. t ' 8 *
- fM P 8F
'lO h3 M% I' In4 *4 q
- w
- t u
".rt?
i i
I i
i i
t i
i l-j i
I-t I
l l'=
I I
l l
I 1
I i
j l
l I
I t
i I
1 I
l 1
l l
i l
l i
h
'l.
8 s
'l l
l
'l 1
I I
I I
I l
I I
I I
l i
I i
i I
I I
I 4
I I
i I
i I
I i
1 I
l Nw
.-n
-, _,.. -