ML20211E235

Rev 2 to T1-CL-I-03, Sys Review Checklist Instructions Form 3

ML20211E235
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	09/26/1997
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20211E051	List: ML20211E046 ML20211E095 ML20211E151 ML20211E204 ML20211E235 ML20211E263 ML20211E279 ML20211E293 ML20211E308 ML20211E330 ML20211E337 ML20211E346
References
T1-CL-I-03, T1-CL-I-3, NUDOCS 9709300070
Download: ML20211E235 (108)

Text

.. _ - _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR P;0 JECT INSTRUCTION PI 411 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O

T1-CL-I-03 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS FORM 3 SjgD.2!IL Dalt Prepared: $ldth 9/M !97 Reviewed: #

SYSR G&up Lead Approved: / 3fu%

• _ 9/,s -/9 y_

rer Company Quanty Approved: _

7. M /]ut/ 4/2//@

Dpih6]ect Director / '

'N Dk DOC 05 0 336

) P PDR

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 39 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 13,1997 l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 i

SYSJ PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 3 - SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST l 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:

o Compare the current system design documentation (including all modifications) to the current system licensing and design basis l

• Provide a resiew of current program / topical areas e

Verify that system components satisfy their current licensing and design basis l 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.

1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Part A.

1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will review the specific checklist requirements l and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Parts C, E.1 through W.1, and X, the assigned l group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /mspector's name to each specific checklist requirement.

p 1.5 System / Program / Topical Summary (Part B.2)

LJ 1.5.1 The OE summarizes the results of the program / topical area review performed in Parts E through W and provides a dispositmn in accordance with the instmetions in Part B.2, signs and dates to indicate that applicable programs were considered in the design basis.

1.5.2 If any program / topical area is determined to not be considered, the OE indicates the program / topical area name, indicates and verifies that it is dispositioned as a discrepancy, signs and dates item 2 of Part B.2.

1.6 System Checklist Requirements (Part C) 1.6,1 Using the FSAR and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) and/or specialist completes Part C of the Checklist following any additional instruction included in Part C.

l 1.6.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient detail. The OE/ inspector determines the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be l used only if required.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pi 40 Revision 2 PI 01. DOC September 23,1997

~

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKilOOK O 1.6.4 Upon completion of review of the checlMst requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a l disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part C, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

1.7 Program / Topical Area Screening Requirements (Parts E to W)

Each program / topical area is screened to determine its applicability to the selected system.

1.7.1 The assigned in;pector/OE completes the screening questions in Parts E through W and determines that the program / topical area was considered and its applicability to the system.

1.7.2 The OE and appropriate program / topical specialist provide disposition in accordance with the instructions, sign and date the form. These signatures indicate that the disposition of the system is correct.

1.8 Programffopical Area Checklist Requirements (Part E.1 through W.1) 1.8.1 Using the FSAR and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) and/or specialist completes Parts E.1 through W.1 of the Checklist additional instruction included in each Part.

1.8.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.8.3 The checklist requirement resuit should be described in suflicient detail. The OE/ inspector determine the depth of the twiew. Wordy paragraphs are to be used only if required.

1.8.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under Item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in each Part, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

1.9 Component Data Verification 1.9.1 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, component tag number, NNECO system code, component description to the form header and indicates the responsible SLE. Repetitive or functionally similar components may be

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

P1 41 Revision 2

4 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRtlCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

{n grouped on the same data sheet. Each non repetitive component requires a separate form and Document ID number.

1.9.2 Upon initiation of Part X, the OE/ review inspector signs and dates the appropriate revision block.

j 1.9.3 The OE/ review inspector completes (Part X) by completing the component data l checklist.

1.9.4 If the component data checklist is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE l is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.9.5 Upon completion of component data checklist, the assigned inspector checks the l appropriate blocks under Item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part X, signs and dates the specific form.

This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

1.9.6 The OE submits the Part X checklist for review and approval in accordance with General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document.

1.10 The OE for Form 3 assures all the reviewer / inspector inputs are included for l s

each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector s signature, and (3) date. The OE counts the number of pages and enters the appropriate total in the header box of the form.

1.11 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Parts C and E through X that are dispositioned as a l

" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B.1 by providing a summary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form.

1.12 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document.

2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The requirements and questions in the following sections are to be used to generate the specific checklist questions to be incorporated on the appropriate form. These questions and rcquhements are based upon the NRC Order, Oversight Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures.

l 2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will S use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review

- J requirements for the selected system.

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

Pl.42 Revision 2

- _ _ - _ _ _ _ . l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2

$VSR PIOJECTINSTRUCTION PI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook.

i O

4 O

- Persons Power Group lac. -

Pl 43 Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION Pi-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O

Q SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST QUESYlONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. The system is reviewed using the following checklist and the results recorded on Form 3.

2. The Systcm Lead Engineer shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the l selected system.

O

4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist questions contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

5. If the selected system does not have a design input use Exhibit 103-1 to prepare a design input checklist.

A. IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN INPUTS AND REOUIREMENTS e

Does a design input exist for the system? Ifyes, use the design input evaluation checklist.

If no, prepare a design input checklist i only the response to the questions need to be filled out). The system will be cviewed against this checklist. Exhibit 1-03-1 is a sample design input checx.

B. DESIGN INPUT EVALUATION Are applicable Codes, Standards and Regulatory Guides referenced in the rwl Design input, Performance Calculations and Specifications?

(G

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 44 Revision 2 PI 01.!XE September 23,1997

l MILLSTC.NE UNIT 2 SYS3 PROJECTINSTRUCTI!N Pi 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK I t%

• Verify that the calculations, specifications, and design specifications incorporate the original licensing basis (as modified).

• If the original design was based on any assumptions are these assumptions still valid?

e Does the PSAR refleu the Current Licensing Basis?

e Does the Design Basis Documentation, as defined by NNECo, identify and define the Design Basis?

• Determine if the System design basis is in accordance with the licensing and regulatory requirements (licensing basis) for the system.

• Is the Design Basis Documentation available, adequately controlled, and revised as required to reflect changes to the Design Basis?

C. CALCULATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

• Do the Calculations confonn to the Design Inputs?

• Are any assumptions used in the calculations technically sound?

e Verify that the system design / performance calculation results envelope any performance requirements used or assumed in the Chapter 14 Accident p

()

• Analysis. Where more than one flow path alignment is used for the system each alignment should be checked.

Are appropriate margins used for establishing the design basis of equipment?

e Were system calculations and analysis performed using recognized and acceptable methods?

e Are the results of the calculations reasonable and consiste :t with the design input?

• Are the calculations performed and verified in accordance with the applicable Design Control procedures?

e Is data in the FS AR consistent with the plant design calculations and analysis?

Do the system calculations / analysis reflect the current plant configuration, Licensed Power Rating and operation?

D. OTHER CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT MEASUREMENTS Do NNECo's Design Guides / Standards etc. provide sutTicient technical guidance for Engineering?

e Verify the seismic and safety classification of those components and portions of a system that perform a critical function.

(

(

Verify that non-safety portions of the system are isolated by automatic valves meeting single failure criteria or that calculations are available demonstrating

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

P1 45 Revision 2 PI ol.1XX: September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION FI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK that any loss of flow to the non-safety branch will not effect the required operation.

• Verify that safety grade power and control signals are provided to the critical '

components.

• Review the control logic, interlocks, power supply, and manual controls associated with pumps and valves for required operation to support system design basis, e Does the system design incorporate and meet the licensing basis commitments?

e Does the data in the FSAR reflect modifications or changes in the licensing l basis?

e Does the current design of the system meet the Design and Licensing Basis requirements?

E. MECHANICAL

• Are the design pressure and temperature correctly selected in accordance with the applicable piping code?

• Are the system design conditions correctly stated in the Procurement Specifications and any ASME Design Specifications?

e Have the code requirements for overpressure protection been correctly applied

' in the design?

e Review valves and orifices in the systems for operating conditions with excessive (flashing or cavitation) pressure drops.

Review the pipe size and flow in the system for Excessive fluid system velocities (erosion),

e Do Valve, Flanges and other piping system components have adequate pressure-temperature ratings?

e Control valve operating conditions are bounded by procurement Specifications or valve vendors as-manufactured data.

Check required (as-built) heat exchanger duty with design requirements.

Review Seismic qualification data for operability of active components.

Has minimum flow protection been provided for pumps that are subject to operation at zero or reduced flow?

e Is there adequate isolation vahing provided in any cross connections between redundant fluid trains?

e Are piping code / code class boundaries clearly identified and correctly applied to the system?

e Dees the design provide instrumentation for performance testing and monitoring?

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 46 Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJEL*1' INS'l-RUCDON PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND'VORKBOOK

(

• Has the design considered the potential transient fluid loadings which may occur in the system?

e Has adequate NPSH been provided for pumps under all operating conditions and alignments?

e Have the effects of pipe whip, jets and flooding been considered in the design?

F. CIVIL. STRUCTURAT&AND PIPING ANALYSIS Does the piping analysis use the correct system configuration, piping material 4 and design pressure / temperature?

e Review piping supports for adequate capacity for piping reaction loads.

• Has the piping analysis considered any applicable post-accident em>ironmental l temperatures that the system may be exposed to and which may exceed the normal piping design temperature?

e Are the design loads, load combinations and allowable values correctly selected in accordance with the applicable codes?

e Review applicability of floor response spectra and equipment damping values for piping analyses, pipe supports, conduit and cable tray supports, tubing design and seismic equipment qualification.

O e Has the correct seismic input been used in the vendor documentation for seismic qualification of electrical and mechanical equipment?

e Were the design calculations for the generic conduit and cable tray supports performed by using accepted methods?

e Does the seismic qualification of electrical cabinets and I&C panels and racks address structural evaluation of host cabinet, cabinet anchorage, housed components and component mounting details?

e Does the number of modes used in the dynamic analyses capture about 90% of the total mass?. If necessary, review how the effects of missing mass are included in the analyses.

Do the dynamic analyses consider three-directional earthquakes where the vertical earthquake response is combited with the larger horizontal earthquake response?

e Are the relative movements between the structures correctly considered in the structural / piping calculations?

e Were the material properties correctly adjusted for high temperatures?

O L./

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 47 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PAOJECTINSTRUCTI"IN PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND V7.!tKBOOK G. ELECTRICAL e

Are the AC and DC electrical systems design bases / inputs including applicable codes, standards, criteria and regulatory requirements identified?

• Are the AC and DC electrical systems design bases / inputs complete and adequate to define the design base?

Are the AC, DC and EDG design base calculations and analyses identified?

e Were the electrical system design base calculations t .malyses performed using organized and accepted methods?

Are the assumptions used in the system calculations or analyses technically sound and do they consider all operational modes and conditions that the AC or DC systems or components or EDG will experience?

e Are the calculations or analyses results consistent with the design inputs?

Do the design base electrical calculations identify available margins?

Are the AC and DC one line diagrams consistent with the supporting analyses?

Do the electrical calculations and analyses support the rating of major safety related equipment / components including but not limited to:

• EDG's p e medium voltage switchgear e low voltage switchgear e power center transformers e batteries and chargers e inverters e distribution panels e motor control centers e cables e electrical penetrations e

Do the AC and DC calculations and analyses represent the current plant configuration?

Is the AC or DC electric power system capable of providing the required l

. power as needed by each component in the system. That is, required voltage, frequency, current maximum and minimums at steady state and transient conditions?

e Can the required power quality be provided for the needed time?

e Do the system component controls meet the design requirements including disconnection from the bus, if required, and load sequencing in the required time?

O V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

P1 - 48 Revision 2 l PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Has the distribution system been adequately designed with regard to cabling, breaker sizes, and coordination?

e is safety-grade IE electrical power and control signals provided to critical components?

e Are the components qualified to perform their safety function in the environment that they will experience?

e Does the component physical arrangement meet requirements such as separation, shielding, barriers, etc. to ensure that single failures do not prevent the system from performing its safety function?

e Do the environmental qualification test conditiens conform to the predicted conditions for that location?

e Is equipment performance specified for the worst accident in which the equipment will be required to perform?

e Do the equipment qualification test reports demonstrate qualification for the required conditions?

e Are the bases for the trip settings for protective devices including breaker, fuses and thermal overloads adequatMo ensure performance of the safety function or protect the equipment in cases of overloads?

Are the valve torque switch settings valid and are the settings tested?

(3 ig H. INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTitOL e

Verify that the Instrumentation and Control design parameters envelope the anticipated nonnal, upset, and design process variables (pressure, temperature, flow) for the Fluid System design ,

e Review the functional, wiring and installation drawings to assure conformance with the licensing and design basis.

Review Qualification documentation to determine ifit is in compliance with the licensing and design basis.?

e Review the alarms or annunciators for the system to determine if the set points and location of the annunciation are appropriate.

Have any required provisions for operation of the System from a remote location for shutdown been included in the design.

Verify that the Instrument and Control system detects and maintains essential parameters during all plant conditions.

Can the required detection and control functions be provided during a loss of offsite power or other anticipated conditions?

e Review the logic functions, interlocks, automatic actuation and other control functions required to assure that they are correctly implemented.

Have the as-built deviations in instrument tap locations and instrument elevations been accounted for in the set point calculations?

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 49 Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

-(O g e Have provisions been made at the control locations (Main Panel or local Panel) to indicate inoperable and bypassed status?

e Does the Instrument and Control design consider separation and redundancy requirements?

e For instrumentation that provides initiation or permissives for system operation verify the range, set point, and set point calculations are adequate, e Has proper signal isolation been provided between safety and non-safety related interfaces?

O

-t O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 50 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK Q,a FORM 3 PART E ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS WITIlOUT SCRAM CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. ATWS is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part E.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

O Q 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. ATWS OUESTIONS FOR SCREENING The following question will be used to screen the system for ATWS applicability.

A yes answer will require more detailed review as defined in Section "B."

Section A - ATWS Screening

• Does this system support plant response to an ATWS event as described in paragraph (b) of 10CFR50.62 and MNPS-2 FSAR Section 7.97 If yes:

Section B - ATWs The following questions should be answered for each system:

. How is this system credited in response to the event?

Does this system function wholly or in part to initiate AFW or a turbine trip in response to an ATWS7 Does this system function wholly or in part as a means diverse from the RTS to interrupt power to the control elements, in response to an ATWS7 b

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 51 Revision 2

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

(~s

- t] FORM 3 PART F CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Control Room Design Review is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Fonn 3 Part F.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

] to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system resiew checklist or Appendix A.

A. CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW The following qusstion will be used w w.cen the system for Control Room Design Review applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B" Section A - Control Room Design Review Screening Does the system contain signals transmitted to the control room for indication, recording, annunciation, computer inputs, or engineered safety features?

N.-

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI-52 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK p

\ Section B - Control Room Desian Review The following questions should be answered for each system.

• Are the controls for the system (main or local panels) located in functional groups related to system stmeture?

e Are secondary controls and displays that are not important to safety located on secondary panels?

e-Is any color coding consistent with other color coding in the control room and does it proside adequate contrast?

Are distinctive enhancement techniques used for emergency controls?

Are frequently used controls located near the center of the preferred visual and manual areas as defined in NUREG 0700? l Are functionally related controls and displays grouped together?

e Are components arranged lefho right and/or top to bottom and in a numeric or alphabetic sequence?

Are the minimum separation guidelines of NUREG 0700 table 7-6 and figure 7-11 complied with?

p e Are displays arranged in horizontal rows?

() . Are controls appropriately and clearly labeled?

e Has a Hierarchical labeling practice in accordance with NUREG 0700, figure 7-12 been applied?

e Are major labels used to identify the system?

e Are labels placed above the device they describe?

e Are labels horizontally oriented to facilitate reading /

Is the nomenclature used on labels the same as that used in the e procedures?

e Are the names, acronyms abbreviations system numbers, etc. used on labels consistent and administratively controlled?

e Is the direction (increase-decrease ) indicated for continuous motion rotary controls?

e Are any lines of demarcation for functions or groups visually distinctive?

e Is any color coding used to identify specific functions applied uniformly throughout the control room?

Are labels clearly readable considering viewing distances and illumination at the panel?

h d

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 53 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCT13N PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

/ \

(j FORM 3 PART G ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CIIECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Environmental Qualification is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 PartG.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall ase the follow'mg l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and g do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l Q to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION REVIEW CRITERIA The following question will be used to screen the system for Environmental Qualification applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in Section "B."

Section A - Environmental Oualification Screening Does the System contain " ACTIVE" components that must be operable during an accident, under post accident environmental conditions or during/after a ,

seismic event?

O O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 54 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

/~T Section B - Environmental Oualification Review t]

The following questions should be answered for each componcnt requiring Environmental qualification:

• Is the component qualified in an approved EQ Documentation Package (File, Binder, etc.)?

e Does the qualification established in the EQDP comply with NRC requirements and consistent with the Licensing Basis (10CFR50.49 - NUREG 0588 Cat. I, Cat. II, DOE Guidelines)?

e- Is the EQDP and the supporting qualification documentation readily auditable?

• Is the EQDP appropriately maintained and updated to reflect

'hanges/ modifications to the original component and plant environment?

e Is the component included in the plant's EQ program for maintenance and replacement as defined in the EQ Data Package?

e Are the electrical and/or control-instrument circuits associated with the component routed using cabics, splices, terminations etc. that are qualified for the post accident conditions in the areas they pass through?

e The installed component in the plant should be checked during the Walkdown O

'd to assure that the installed configuration i.e., manufacturer model, electrical / process spec., interfaces (cables, splices, terminal blocks, etc.); l special EQ ir.stallation (conduit seals, etc.) is in accordance with the qualification documentation.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 55 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK i FORM 3 PART H EROSION / CORROSION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS h

1. Erosion / Corrosion is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part H.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the fallowing questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

A V 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. EROSION / CORROSION PROGRAM REVIEW CRITERIA Has Millstone Unit 2 developed an erosion / corrosion monitoring program?

• Does the program have well-defined criteria for:

- selecting inspection points

- determining inspection frequency

- defining method ofinspection making replacement / repair decisions e Does the program include:

- high-energy single-phase lines, including long-term inspection

- two-phase lines, including guidelines and computer codes

- large moderate-energy single-phase piping systems e

Has a plant-specific history of pipe wall thinning, including failure analysis and l damage mechanism been established?

Has a training program been implemented?

O LJ

+

Have personnel conducting NDE examinations been properly certified?

- Parsons Power Group inc. -

Pi- 56 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 13

'Q FORM 3 PART I EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. External Events / Hazards is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part I.

2, The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l t to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question cantained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS REVIEW CRITERIA Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by wind loads?

Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by snow loads?

Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by seismic loads?

Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by tornado loads?

Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by hurricane loads?

Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by flooding caused by natural phenomena?

e

, Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that could be O affected by possible malevolent use of vehicles?

()

- Panons Power Group lac. -

Pl.57 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK q_s FORM 3 PART J GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV)

CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Generic Letter 89-10 (MOV)is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part J.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and 7 do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

( to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CRITERIA Are there safety related motor operated valves in this system?

Are there safety related position changeable valves in this system?

Are there non-safety related valves in this system that should be included in the G.L. 89-10 program?

e Was the G.L. 89-10 program considered during the installation of new valves in this system?

e Was the G.L. 89-10 program considered during the maintenance of valves in this system?

/

V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

l l

PI- 58 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR P.'.OJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART K HEAVY LOADS CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Heavy Loads are redewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Pan K.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

( to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. HEAVY LOADS REVIEW CRITERIA e

Has a control-of-heavy-loads program been established for the plant in accorrlance with NUREG-0612.

Does the system have any safe shutdown equipment positioned under a overhead load handling system capable oflifting the plant defined heavy load?

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 59 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK A

() FORM 3 PART L HIGH AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAKS (HELB/MELB)

CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (HELB/MELB)is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part L.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and s do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE cr Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. HELB/MELB REVIEW CRITERIA

• Are HELB/MELB location requirements identified in accordance with the Licensing / Design Basis?

Are essential systems / components required for operation of the system being reviewed identified in design documents?

Does system satisfy separation criteria for essential systems / components?

Are break effects considered and mitigatt.d or evaluated correctly?

e Are flooding, jets and spray conditions evaluated or identified in design documents?

Are mitigating or evaluated conditions identified in design documents for use in maintaining configuration?

Are pipe rupture / whip restraints or structural separation provided at break s locations as required to protect other systems required for shutdowns?

[G'

- Parsons Power Group Inc. - l PI- 60 Revision 2 PIO1. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Are safe shutdown components for other systems protected fromjets from the system? -

i O

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 61 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997 '

4 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK (3

g FORM 3 PART M INSERVICE INSPECTION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REC'JIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Inservice Inspection is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part M.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and

,_. do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

( to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system rev;ew checklist or Appendix A.

A. INSERVICE INSPECTION REVIEW CRITERIA

. Are any system components part of the mechanical integrity or pressure retaining capability of a:

- pump

- valve

- piping

- vessel

- storage tank

- Rx Vessel Support Structures

- supports for piping, vessel, storage tank that fall into the boundaries of the ISI Program?

Does the component have any augmented exam requirements identified in the ISI program manual.

• Are any system components listed in the ISI manual, u)

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.62 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

{3) FORM 3 PART N INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Inservice Testing (Appendix J) is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part N.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

( to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. INSERVICE TESTING APPENDIX J REVIEW CRITERIA Is the Primary Reactor Containment peak design pressure supported by appropriate analyses?

Has the pressure test been held for the appropriate length of time?

• Have any containment isolation valve been modified before the test?

e Is the leak rate calculation appropriate?

• Have any leak path to the environment been sealed for the test that would exist during operations?

• Have all penetrations through the primary reactor containment been tested?

e Have leak rate test results been trended?

IIave the appropriate instrument error been incorporated into the analyses?

3 (O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl 63 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK m) FORM 3 PART O IPEEE CHECKl.lST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. IPEEE is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part O.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the Sasis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection aam.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. IPEEE REVIEW CRITERIA Has a " Individual Plant Examination for Extemal Events (IPEEE)" program been entablished and executed for the plant to satisfy Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 47 Does the IPEEE program comply with the guidance of NUREG-1407?

What is the methodology (Seismic Margin Assessment or Seismic Probabilistic Rish Assessment) used in the implementation of the IPEEE program at Millstone Unit 2?

Identify any significant or programmatic deviation from the guidelines in Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, and NUREG-1407.

o Has the IPEEE program been affected by Information Notice 94-32, Revised Seismic Hazard Estimates, issued to advise licensees that the NRC is re-visiting the IPEEE program to assess the impact of the revised seismic hazard curves in b

o

- Parsons Power Group Inc. - j PI- 64 Revision 2 PI-Gt. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PZOJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK NUREG 1488 The original sei;mic hazard curves are documented in NUREG/CR 52507 Was Millstone Unit 2 classified as a " focused scope" or a " reduced scop" plant during the implententation of the IPEEE program?

e Does the system include any active mechanical and electrical coniponents that are part of the IPEEE selected equipment list?

e Does the system include tanks and heet exchangers that are required to achieve and maintain safe shutdown?

e Does the system include any outliers identified during the implementation of the IPEEE program?

e Have all identified IPEEE corrective e tions been addressed to satisfactory conclusions for the subject system?

V i

v

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 65 Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

/3 Q FORM 3 PART P MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL)

CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Master Equipment and Parts List is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part P.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and n do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l (j to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. MEPL REVIEW CRITERIA

• General Is the System and the componems in the system assigned the correct Safety Classification in accordance with the Licensing and Design Basis?

- Is the Safety Function correctly defined for Category I components?

- Is the functional basis for the system safety related determination in agreement with the Tier 2 critical safety functions?

. MEPL changes for Parts

- Has MEPL changes for Parts reflect the component's safety classification and associated licensing / design basis.

Does the evaluation for use of commercial grade items reflect the components safety classification and associated licensing / design basis.

V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 66 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Vendor TechnicalInformation For Key Safety Related Components have the associated vendor documents been reviewed for periodic update?

Periodic updates can be required as a result of plant mocifications, industry experience or equipment vendor changes.

Are periodic updates incorporated in affected O&M procedures, drawings, databases, EQ packages, etc.?

- Have parts and subcomponents updates / changes to VTI been incorporated into the MEPL7

• Phys ,11 Verification (Walkdown)

Do the NNECo drawings identified as operations critical reflect MEPL data for safety related and augmented quality?

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI 67 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

/~'N

! ) FORM 3 PART Q v

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Regulatory Guide 1.97 compliance is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part Q.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and g do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l Q to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the cystem review checklist or Appendix A.

A. R.G.1.97 REVIEW CRITERIA Are all of the instruments required to meet the licensing basis for Regulatory Guide 1.97 for the system included in the MP2 design Basis (SP-M2-EE-0012)?

Is the correct measured variable type (A, B, C, D, or E) assigned in accordance with RG 1.977 Is the RG 1.97 instrumentation qualified for the post accident environmental conditions in the zone where it is located?

Is the RG 1.97 instrumentation powered from safety related power sources where required by RG 1.977 Have the instrument ranges been selected to cover post accident measured variable values?

Do the plant testing programs cover the periodic testing of RG 1.97 instrumentation?

- Parsens Power Group Inc. -

PI- 68 Revision 2 Pb01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 6VSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK o

FORM 3 PART R S EPA RATION /IND EPENDENCE/ DIVERSITY CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Separation /'mdependence/ diversity is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part R.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY REVIEW CRITERIA The following question will be used to screen the system for Separation /

Independence / Diversity applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B" Section A - Separation / Independence / Diversity Review Screening Does the system contain " Active" components that must be operable during an accident, or post accident conditions or during/after a seismic event?

Section B - Seoaration/Indeoendence/ Diversity Review e

If the question is answered yes, a Separation / Independence / Diversity review of the system is required.

I b

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

P1 - 69 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3 PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART S SET POINT CONTROL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQlilREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS ,

1. Set point controlis reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part S.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l

/ to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in

.the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. SET POINT CONTROL REVIEW CRITERIA The following question will be used to screen the system for Set Point Control applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B",

Section A - S_et Point Control Review Screening S e Does the system contain at least one set point, which is critical to operation of t0e system, during an accident, post-accident or during/after a seismic event?

O

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 70 Revision 2 P1-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCIlON PI-01

__SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK Section B - Set Point Control Review For each calculation answer the following questions.

• Are all assumptions reasonable and normal?

e Is good engineering judgement used in making and qualifying the assumptions?

e Are the assumptions complete?

• Are all design inputs complete, documented, reasonable and normal?

Are the sources of data for these calculations reasonable and reliable?

• 'Are all applicable process conditions and effects properly addressed?

e Is the methodology used consistent with the time of the calculation?

e Are all appropriate assumptioris and setpoints transferred to plant documents? >

e Are the setpoints used in the plant enveloped by the calculations?

e Do the calculations support the technical specifications and other design documents? ,

l O'J O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 7I Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBL OK n

FORM 3 PART T SINGLE FAILURE CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS .

1. Single Failure is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part T.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include cach question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

O

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. SINGLE FAILURE REVIEW The following question will be used to screen the system for Single Failure Review applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B" Section A - Single Failure Review Screening Does the system contain any active components that must be operable during an accident or under post-accident conditionf Section B - Single Failure Revieay If the question is answered yes, a single failure review of the system is required.

Was a single failure analysis performed on each component required per (G

q) Section A?

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 72 Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCT 12N PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK A

( J- FORM 3 PART U ,

STATION BLACKOUT CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Station Blackout is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part U.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3 The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as {

required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and

, do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l g to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or 3pecialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. STATION BLACKOUT REVIEW CRITERIA The following questions will be used to screen the system for Station Blackout applicability, A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in l Section B.

Section A - Station Blackout Review Screening Is the system being reviewed identified in the Millstone Unit SBO response scenario as being utilized?

Section B - Station Blackout Review e Are the system SBO functions identified in NNECo's SBO scenario consistent G with the NUMARC document?

) b

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pi- 73 Revision 2 PI4)l. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYS*1P;.0JECTINSTRUCTION FI 411 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Can the components perform the required function as described in the SBO scenario?

• Are all of the system components required to perform the SBO function listed in the SBO equipment list?

• Do the MEPL and PMMS entries for the system identify the SBO function e correctly for the components required for SBO?

e Do any SBO related calculations for the system follow the NUMARC guidance for method, use the correct inputs and are correctly performed to obtain a correct result?

e Verify that any containment isolation valves in the system will fail closed in an SBO or can be manually closed.

• Verify that any system electrical equipment that is powered from the alternate AC source during an SBO can be connected to the alternate AC source and that all of the breakers required are identified on the SBO Component list.

. Verify the DC and AC loads used in SBO Power requirement calculations for system components are correct.

. Verify that any system instmmentation required during an SBO is powered from an available source and is correctly identified in the station operating procedures.

Review SBO Emergency Operating ?roccoures for the system to rssure that they correctly implement the SBO scenario.

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.74 Revision 2 501. DOC September 23,1997

, f _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _

s MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 41 SV$R IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART V APPENDIX R CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Appendix R is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part V.

2, The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l

questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific fonn in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the r, elected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist quecion contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. APPENDIX R CRITERIA The following questions will be used to screen the system for Appendix R applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in Section B.

Section A - Appendix R Resiew Screening

• Is the system (or any portion of the system) necessary for safe p! ant shutdown in the event of a 10CFR50 Appendix R fire?

Section B - Aenendix R Reyim Are the system and the specific safe shutdown components appropriately defined in the plant Appendix R documentation and in the operating O. procedures used by operating personnel for a fire scenario?

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

Pl . 75 Revision 2

. P141. DOC September 23,1997

i

, MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3P'0JECTINSTRUCTION PI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

• Does the Appendix R documentation demonstrate compliance to the separation criteria of 10CFR50 Appendix R, Section III.G.2 for the safe shutdown components and circuits?

• Are local manual operations or local administrative actions (if applicable)

adequately dermed?

i e is alternative or dedicated shutdown capability (e.g. remote shutdown for a 1

main control room fire) provided in accordance with 10CFR50 Appendix R, Section III.L7 i e For the fire areas requiring the use of the system for safe shutdown, does the l

! Appendix R documentation demonstrate the availability of the necessary j i

support systems; e.g. electrical power, control power, service water, IWAC7 .

e llave the equipment and circuits necessary for safe shutdown been identified? I i . lias the impact of fire barriers / wrap on cable derating been addressed?

• For manual actions necessary for safe shutdown, has the required lighting and communication been provided?

e llave associated circuits been identified and their impact addressed?

e For the system under reviews, do the circuits and equipment required for safe shutdown have adequate separation or fire barriers in representative fire zones.

4 O

l l 1

l d

4 I

s 4

4 O

- I' mons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.76 Revision 2 501. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART W USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. USI A 46 Seismic Qualification is reviewed using the following checklist and the recults of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part W.

2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.

3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.

A. SEISMIC OUALIFICATION REVIEW CRITERIA e Has a " Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment, Unresolved Safety issue (USI) A-46" program been established and executed for the plant?

e Does the program in Item 1 comply with the Seismic Qualification Utility Group's (SQUG) Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), including Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report Number 2, to satisfy Generic Letter 87-02?

e Identify any significant or programmatic deviation from the GIP's guidelines for seismic verification of plant equipment.

• Does the system include any active mechanical and electrical components and cable trays that are required during and following a design basis seismic event?

f3 O

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

P1 77 Revision 2 PI 01. DOC September 23, I997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2 PIOJECT INSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

• Does the system include tanks and heat exchangers that are required to achieve and maintain safe shutdown?

e Does the system include any outliers identified during the implementation of the USI A-46 resolution program?

e What is the methodology used for seismic qualification of outliers?

e Has the SGUG's GIP's methodology been utilized for seismic qualification ofnew and replacement components?

e Have allidentified USI A-46 corrective actions been addressed to l satisfactory conclusions for the subject system?

e Was there any integration between the USI A46 and IPEEE programs?

O O

- Persons Power Group loc. -

PI 78 _

Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- Page .1 of MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(Switem Team t rad)

PART A SYSTEM DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 sw .ew se .aw sw ..a=

1. ORIGINATOR

2. REVIEWED - - -

Mechanical Lead Electricallead Control Systems Lead ISping/Structurallead Operations Engineer Procedures Engineer Testing Engineer

3. APPROVAL - - -

A System Lead Engmeer SVSR Lead Engineer PARTB.1 SYSTEM

SUMMARY

lastructions: (1) The SLE will reglew the attached checklists and supplemental material and indicate n hether the system adequately considered or incorporated the Indicated requirements.

(2) The SLE will review the attached program / topical checLllsts and supplemental material and Indicate whether the system adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirements.

(3) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP-07.

REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2

1. lleve System licensing requirements been O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No l adequately addressed?

2. Hase all program / topic 61 area listed been O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No adequately addressed?

3. Arc component requirements satisfied? O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No

4. Summary of Discrepancy (les) Items Signature SLE/Date

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 1 Peckage Sequence No. 4 Wesision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLH. P ge 2 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODEt ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

S\ STEM DESIGN INPUT AND l LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeet; (System Team lead)

PART H.2 SYSTEM PROGRAM /rOPICAL

SUMMARY

Instructions: (1) The OE will summerine ubich of the program areas are included in the licensing besle of the system.

l This Part should not be completed until the detall revice s in Parts E through W hate been completed.

! (2) The Dr. needs to assure ibat NNECo has considered the applicability of EACH program / topical area.

When dispositioning the question below, the OE needs to reiiew the licensing besle or program to the estent that NNECo considered it during in the system design.

j NOTE: Because these are topical areas, NNECo licensing basis needs to consider each program / topical ares

for applicability. However, f,AClj ares may not effect/in pact the system and hence not be applicable to the

licensing / design basis.

Form 3 AI7PLICABLE TO

< Reference PROGRAMfrOPICAL AREA THE SYSTEM Section CURRENT Part LICENSING BASIS

E Anticipated Transients Without SCRAM (ATWS) O Yes O No

F Control Room Design Resiew 0 Yes O No l 0 Emironmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment (EQ) O Yes O No f

11 Erosion / Corrosion O Yes O No 1 External Events /Ilazards O Yes O No

J Generic Letter 8910 (MOV) O Yes O No is Heavy Loads O Yes O No L High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (llELB/MELB) O Yes O No M Insenice Inspection O Yes O No

. N Insenice Testing /10 CFR50 Appendix J Testing O Yes O No j O IPEEE O Yes O No j P Master Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) O Yes O No

. Q Regulatory Ouide 1.97 Compliance O Yes O No R Separation / Independence / Diversity 0 Yes O No S Set Point Control O Yes O No T Single Failure O Yes O No U Station Blackout O Yes O No O

i

~

V

~ Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 2 Package Sequence No. d Resislon 2 F3.CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

. _ - _ _ _ -. . _ - - . . -. = - -. - - _ - - . _ -. -

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLH- Page .) of ss MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

j SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:  !

($vstem Tearn lead) I V 10 CFR$0 Appendix R O Yes O No l W USI A 46 Seismic Qualification 0 Yes O No

1. O Yes O No A review of the program / topical area indicates that the current system licensing / design basis has considered the applicability of ggh program / topical area. (if"Yes," sign and date below. If "No," verify that a discrepancy was processed as part of system program review. Indicate in step 2 the program, sign and date. REMEMBER. APPLICABILITY is a requirement but CONSIDERATIONis a process).

Originating Enginect/Date:

2.a The following Program (s)llas Not Been Considered: lOE Delete this item is not apr'icable)

a. PROGRAM:

q O DISCREPANCY processed h Originating Engineer /Date:

b v

- Persons Power Groep Inc. -

FORM:3 I-03 3 Package Sequence No. 4 ,

Revision 2 l F3.,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

)

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLH. P:ge .4 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING IIASIS CllECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

PART C SYSTEM LICENSING / DESIGN INPUT REQUIREMENT CIIECKLIST Instructions: For each requirrment listed below:

(1) GLE, SLE, OE and system team develops the specific requirements to be reviewed using the generic questions in the Instruction and Attachment A source book. Egik requitement will be given a new item number and include steps A, B, C, and D.

(2) Each requirement will be consecuthely numbered startthg with I (one).

(3) The system lead Engineer will asinga the function group responsible for reviewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M Electrical = E, Controls = IAC. Testing = T. Procedures = P Operations = 0 (4) The individual that reviews the requirement will tien and date.. prwide a disposition, indicated interfaces, and preside a response based upon the following:

a. Yes Requirement is satisfactorily addressed, include ref.rence source, trvision. and date. No esplanation/results is required.

b. No Requirement is not satisfactory addressed. Include reference soutte, revision and date,if applicable. If RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the reference RAI number and subsequent NNECo response reference is to be provided. Provide an esplanation of how you concluded the requirement was not satisfied. Include reference source, revision, and date.,if applicable. Disposition ee a DISCREPANCY, The responsible indhidual shallimmediately advise Oi the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioued as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP-07 mlit be by the OE.

c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Esplanation should be included only ifit clarifles the disposition.

d. INF Requirement could not be serified because infonnation could not be found. Include a statement under results that indicates the information could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY, The responsible individual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP.

07 will be by the OE.

PartC Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O - Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 4 Package Sequence No. 4 Resision 2 F3 CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. Page 5 of1:

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team lead)

D. REVIEW SifMMARY/REStfLT O

O - Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 I-03 5 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- Pcte .6 of ss c MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODEI

( ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM: >

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmect:

PART D TOPICAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS CIIECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS Instructions: For each program / topical requirement listed in EstE throughfali,E below:

(1) The OE/mlener/ specialist completes and Dispoillions Part 11. The miewer/ specialist responsible for the requirement miens the Program / Topical ares to the extent necessary to serify that the system w as considered when the program was developed and indicates this verification in the appropritte area below.

(2) If Part 11 is disposition as Applienble, the CLE, SLE, and OE/ specialist develops ti.e specific requirements to be reviewed using the generic questions in the Instruction and Attachment A source book and enters the requirement to be reviewed in Part 12. Igji requirement will be given a new item number and include steps A, B, C, and D.

(3) Esch requirement will be consecutively numbered starting with I (onek (4) The system lead Engineer will assign the function group responsible for reviewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M, Electrical = E. Controls = I AC. Testing = T. Procedures = P, Operations = 0 (5) The OE/ Specialist reviews the requirement will sinn and date., provide a disposition, Indicated interfaces, and provide a response based upon the following:

a. Yes Requltrment is satisfactorily addressed. Include stference source, revision, and date. No esplanation/rvsults la required.

, b. No Requirement is not satisfactory addressed. Include reference source, revision and date, if applicable if RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the reference RAI number end subsequent NNECo response reference is to be prmided. Prmide an explanation of how you concluded the requirement u as not satisfied. Include reference source, revision, and date., if applicable. Disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible indhidual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY, Initiation of Project Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.

c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Esplanation should be included only ifit clartfles the dispoillion.

d. INF Requirement could not be verifled because information could not be found. Include a statement under results that Indicates the information could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible indhidual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP.

07 will be by the OE.

- Persons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 6 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB- Page .7 of us MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST ~

ResponsiNe Engmeer.

PART E ANTICIPATED TRANSIENT WITIIOUT SCRAM (ATWS)

CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this syr'em for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area within the FSAR7

3. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the

~

program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1. 2, apjl 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07, if response to questions I,2, p.g 3 is "Yes," continue with nest question, b 4. O Yes O No Does the system include the applicable provisions for the licensing basis requirements for Anticipated Transients Without SCRAM (ATWS)?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part E.1 checklists if "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICAELE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 0 PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

O - Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 7 Package Sequence No. 4 Reilslon 2 F3.CLLRD. DOC 9/23/97

i DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. Itge ,8A AlILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O iCAve SvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSrEu:

LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Respmsible Engineer:

(System Team leadi PART E.1 ANTICIPATED TRANSIENT WITllOUT SCRAM (ATWS) CilECKLIST

., Par 1E.1 Review Requirement item Group Statna Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INI' Date

)

A. REOUIREMFNT l

t H. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

4 O SATISFYING TifE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPAl(CY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & sot!RCE/ REVISION / DATE:

O V

D. REVIEW SUMMABY/ RESULT i

t 4

i

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 8 Package Sequence No. 4 Resision 2 QCLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT IDt RC-SLH. Page 3 of. n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

~~~

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST Responsible Engtnect.

PART F CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CONSinERATION/ SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

l. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the inblation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?

3. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or 0) design input?

If th response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07, if response to questions 1,2. g.g 3 is "Yes," continue with nest question.

O 4. O Yes O No Does the system have any controls, labeling or operating procedures effected by the Control Room Design Review or iluman Factors Review??

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part F.1 checkilsts if "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED llUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

H. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 0 }f OGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM

( 0 PROGRAM 15 APPLICABLE Program / Topical Speciallit/Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM:3 1-03 9 Package Sequence No. 4 Revlilon 2 F3 CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. l' age 10 of us MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

PART F.1 CONTROL ROOM DESIGN HEVIEW CilECKLIST Partr.1 Review Requirement item Group Status Resiewer's Signature

1. D Yes D No O NA O DiF Date i

A. REOlflREMENT I

H. REOlflREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISITING THE 1,ICENSING/ DESIGN HASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07)

C. REFERENCEfS) & SOllRCE/ REVISION / DATE:

D. REVIEW SilMMARY/RESlfi,T i

d 5

1 i

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 10 Package Sequence No. 4 Re51sion 2 F3,,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/9'l

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. P:ge 11 of su g MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM Cods:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team lead)

PART G ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EQ)

CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo consideted or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FS AR7

3. O Yes O No lit.s NNECo considered or addressed the potential imract on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, ap.gl 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If p response to questions I,2. gr 3 l= "Yes," continue wIth nest question.

4. O Yes O No Does the system contain " Active" components that must be operable during an accident, under post accident emironmentr.1 conditions or during/after a seismic event?

If"Yes", Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE and complete Part G.1 checklist. If"No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BITT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Prograintropical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date.

- Parson P mer Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03.I1 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3,,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

i l

DOCUMENT ID: RC. Slit. Page _12 of is MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS  ;

CIIECKLIST i

Responsible trigmect:

PART G.1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EQ)

CilECKLIST q

PartG.I Neview Mequirement Item Group Ctatus Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date l

A. }Q:OlllREMENT i

11. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

^

O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

V D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT O

V

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 12 Package Sequence Na 4 Redilon 2 QCLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLH- Page .13 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O iCive SvSa SvSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEul LICENSING BASIS

CIIECK. LIST Respormb'e Engmect

PART 11 EROSION / CORROSION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN HASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

l 2. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FS AR7

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the i

program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design n.put?

If the response to questions I,2,3ad 3 is "No" Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP 07, if response to questions 1,2, pg 31s "Yes," continue with next question.

4. O Yes O No lias the system been evaluated in accord.nce with the crosion/ corrosion program for the

unit?

4 If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part H.1 checklists if

, "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

l H. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE I

Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

i O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM:3 l-03 13 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3.CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLH. Page 14 of1 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O ic^ve SvSn SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEul LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible 1.ngineer:

(System Team I. cad)

PART 11.1 EROSION / CORROSION CHECKLIST Partill Review Requirement Iteen Gmup Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. RE0tilREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S)& SOLIRCE/ REVISION / DATEt O

V D. REVIEW Si!MMARY/RESilLT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 103 14 Package Sequence No. 4 Resition 2 F3_C11BD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: MC SLB. Page .15 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team ind)

PARTI EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS CONSIDERATION /SCMEENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNEco cor.:idered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the p;ogram?

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the progranvtopical area within the FSAR7

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the progranvlopical area being reviewod within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No" Disposillon as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the disertpancy la accordance with PP.417. If r response to questions 1,2, n 3 is "Yes," costlaue with mest questloa.

O .

4. O Yes O No is the system located within building structures or include other features required to protect the system from external rnissiles tornadoes, flooding or other external events included in the licensing basis?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part 1.1 checklists. If "No," dispositlom as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT WPLICABLE TO SYSTEM D PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE Progreenfropical Speelelist/ Dele:

Originating Engineer /Dete:

O - Parsons Power Group inc. -

FORM: 3

-I 43 15 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.S LB. Page 16 ofin MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INDUT AND LICENSING HASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

PART 1.1 EXTERNAL EVENTS /ilAIARDS CllECKLIST PartL1 Review Requirement item Crown $tatus Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INI' Date A. REOt!IREMENT H. REOlllREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS q nicentEPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S)& SOtfRCE/ REVISIONIDATE:

O D. REVIEW St1MMARY/REStil,T O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 16 Package Sequence No. 4 Resision 2 F3.CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. Page 17 of zu MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING HASIS CllECKLIST Responsible Engmeer; (Sistem Team lead)

PARTJ GENERIC LE' ITER 8910 (MOV) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN DASIS SCREENING

l. D Yes D No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. D Yes D No llan NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this sy stem for the program / topical area within the FS AR?

3. D Yes D No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (4 )

modification process or (3) design input?

)

, If the response to questions 1,2 A!!d 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2, p_t3 la "Yes," continue with nest question. I f

A

4. D Yes D No llave the motor operated valves in the s) stem been evaluated under the unit's program for MOV's? (8910)?

{

1 l

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part J.1 checklists. if "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BlTT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE l

Program / Topical Specialist /Date: .

Originating Engineer /Date:

V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

t FORM: 3 l

I-03 17 PackageSequenceNo 4 i

Revision 2 F3 CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB. P:ge 18 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CllECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team 1. cad)

PART J.1 GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CHECKLIST PartJ t Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes D No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07)

C. REFERENCE (Si & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT O

V

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 18 Package Sequence No. 4 Revi lon 2 F3,CLLRD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB- Page 19 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYS'GM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team lead)

PART K HEAVY LOADS CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential ir.. pact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, And 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. De OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP F. If response to questions 1,2, gg 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

g

4. O Yes O No llave any crancs located over the system been evaluated under the Unit's heasy loads program?

If Yes, Dispositlom as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE Comiplete Part K.! checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BlfT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Dets:

Origianting Engineer /Dete:

O - Persons Power G Suplac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 19 Package Sequence No. 4 RevisLon 2 ILCLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB- P ge 20 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

( ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM: 1 SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmect:

PARTK.1 IIEAVY LOAUS CilECKLIST Par 1K.I Reilew Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date l A. FEOUIREMENT i

l B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

I O SATISITING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS

! O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07) l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

i D. REVIEW SUMMAR"/RESUlsT 1

q

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1-03 20 Package Sequence No. 4 Resision 2 ILCLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLil- Page 21 of zu MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O iCAve SvSa SvSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEul LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLT.ST Responsit>le Engmccr:

(System Team lead)

PART L HIGH AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAKS (llELB/MELB)

CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo conslJettu or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FS AR?

3. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) vstem design criteria, (2) modification procese or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2. And 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. T e OE will process the discarpancy in accordance with PP-07. If O 4. O Yes O No response to queitions I,2, gt 3 is "Yes," continue with neit question.

lias the effect of p pc rupture and/or breaks in the system been evaluated for the imrM on safe shutdown coriponents/ systems in accordance with the licensing basis?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Coenplete Part Ll checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

al. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 0 PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAM 15 APPLICABLE PrsgranWopical Specialist /Date: .

Originating Engineer /Date:

O - Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 21 Package Sequence No. 4 4

Resision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

l DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLH. Page 22oiis MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

~

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engineer:

PART L.1 IIIGli AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE HREAKS (IIELH/MELH) CllECKLIST PartLI Neview Requirement item Gmup status Reviewer's Signature

1. D Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOtflRFMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-(17)

C. EEEEEENCEfS) & SOllRCE/ REVISION / DATE:

D. REVIEW SilMMARY/RESilLT s

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-03 22 Package Sequence No. 4 Revlilon 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.S L B- Page 23 of as MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O Q ICAVP SYSR SYSTER '

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST l

Responsit>1e Engmeer:

f System Team I cad)

PART M INSERVICE INSPECTION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topleal area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O 6 lias NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR7 l

3. O Yes O No llae NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design inpet?

If the response to questions 1,2. gd 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2. g 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

[ 4. O Yes O No Are the piping and components of the system included in the unit's insetrice inspection

( program where aompriate?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part M.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYS1 EM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE l Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

O O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I-03 23 Package Sequencs 10, 4 t

Resisjon 2 l F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

2,' DOCUMENT ID: RULB- Page 24 of xx hi 6 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

.O iCAve SvSa SvSTEul SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Jaam Lead)

PART M.1 INSERVICE INSPECTION CIIECKLIST PartM.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status lleviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date i A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

1 0 SATISFYl?'G INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPAhCr* (Process per PP-07)

C. BEFERENCE(S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REV1EW'ttjgt!.li~1Y/ RESULT r

z-O - Parsons Pcwer Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I 24 Package Sequence No. 4 P-t = 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC  % >7

DOCUMEh t'!D: RC.SLB- Pcge.JS of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team lead)

PART N INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No lias NNECo considered or addresseo the potential impact on this system for the progranVtopical area wit:iin the PSAR7

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2, glr 3 is "Yes," continue with next question, d 4. O Yes O No Are the components in the system covered by the unit's insenice testing program where appropriate? (ASME Section XI or Appendix J)

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part N.1 checklists. If "No,"_ disposition as PRQGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT A'?LICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAM IS APPLICADLE Progranvropical Spects!!st/Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I4 3 - 25 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

4 I

I DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLH- Page 26 of xx  !

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: l ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engurer:

(System Team lead)

PART N.1 INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CHECKLIST 4

PartN.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

I D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT l

l l

l O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

' FORM: 3 1 26 Package Sequence No. 4 Resision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 27 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O V ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team 1xad)

PART O IPEEE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING L 0 Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the progrand

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered pr addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR7

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical r.rea being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions I,2, an,d 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2, Er 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

4. O Yes O No Has the protection of the system been considered the unit's Individual Plant Examination for External Events? (IPdEE)

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part 0.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP 07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

l FORM: 3 I 27 Package Sequence No. 4 RevisIan 2 F3_CLLBI' LOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB. Ptge 28 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer.

(System Team Lead)

PARTO.1 IPEEE CHECKLIST PartO.1 Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REV1EW

SUMMARY

/RESUI,T O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I 28 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

4 DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- P:g 29 of xx

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

C'\

U ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND

LICENSING BASIS

CHECKLIST

Responsible Engmeer

(Svstem Team Lead)

PART P MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL)

CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

, 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

4

. 2. O Yes O No lias NNEco considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the

] program / topical area within the FSAR?

3 0 Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2)

modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, an.d 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If

( response to questions 1,2, o.r 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

\ 4. "I Yes O No Are the system components correctly entered into the Master Equipment and Parts List?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE, Complete Part P.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE i TO SYSTEM.

l B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP47 4

O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BlIT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM I O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE 4

Programfropical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineeri ste

I 4

r

!O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 29 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 i_ F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Pcg2 30 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer:

(System Team Lead)

PART P.1 MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL) CHECKLIST PartP.I Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. D Yes D No D NA D INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B, REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT b

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I-03 30 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- P:g2 31 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART Q REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the puential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions I,2,and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07, if response to questions I,2, gr 3 is "Yes," continue with ncrt question.

O 4. O Yes O No Does the system contain the required instrumentation and indication for licensing basis V compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.977 If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part Q.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Proces per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

U

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 31 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3.,CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 32 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART Q.1 REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PartQ.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW S11MMARY/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 32 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLC- Page 33 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(Mstem Team Lead)

PART R SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

l. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addrestal the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being resiewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions I,2, gn,( 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2, p,r 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

4. O Yes O No Does the system comply with the licensing basis for separation / independence / or diversity?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part R.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

H. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE 'lO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABIE Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

O

- Parson Power Group lac. -

FORM: 3 1-0. - J3 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- P:ge 34 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SVSR - SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team lead)

PART R.1 SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY CHECKLIST PartR.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature O Yes O No O NA O INF

1. Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I 34 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CI1BD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-S LB- Page 35 of xx

,_ MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

C ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SYSTEM:

LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART S SET POINT CONTROL CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

l. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O ' es O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, An.d 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07, if response to questions 1,2, p.r 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

O 4. O Yes O No Does the system have instruments that require evaluation for the use of correct prwxtures

\ and controls to establish setpoints?

If Ycs, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part S.1 checkhsts, if "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist!Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

lO - Parsons Power Group Inc. - ,

i FORM: 3 '

! I 35 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 l F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97 l

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- l P:ge 36 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

I ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST  !

Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team lead)

PART S.1 SET POINT CONTROL CHECKLIST i Parts.1 Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date

, A. REOUIREMENT i

4

! B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

!O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT i

I 4

l i

l I

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I 36 Package Sequence No. 4

)  ;

Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

_ _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . - . _ _ _ . _ _ -_._______.__._._._m _ . _ . .

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- P:ge 37 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

l. ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

! SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND

LICENSING BASIS -

! CHECKLIST 5

Responsible Engineer-l (System T-vn Lead)

PART T SINGLE FAILURE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING i

A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING l

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the

, program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

i 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area within the FSAR?

! 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addreM the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area being resiewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) i modification process or (3) design input?

{ If the response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No". Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If j response to questions 1,2 gr 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

l O 4. O Yes O No Does the system design consider single failure vulnerabilities and include prosision for l assuring operability of the safely function with a single failure?

j If Yes, Disposition as i?ROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part T.1 checklists. If

"No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

1 1

l B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 i

O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM

{ O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE e

Programfropical Specialist /Date

I Originating Engineer /Date:

i i

i 1 \

)4 - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I-03 -37 Package Sequence No. 4 Revhlon 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 38 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS '

CIIECKLIST ~

Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART T.! SINGLE FAILURE CIIECKLIST PartT.I Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOtilREMENT B. REOLIIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOliRCE/ REVISION / DATE:

(

O)

D. REVIEW SIIMMARY/ RESULT s

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 I 38 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3 C11BD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 39 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

^\

I (V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team lead)

PART U STATION BLACKOUT CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FS AR?

3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions 1,2, an.d 3 is "No" Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If ersponse to questions I,2 gr 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

4. O Yes O No is the system or any components of the system used for Station Blackout coping?

If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part U.I checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check oaly one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineer /Date:

Ci V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 39 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3,CLLBD. DOC 9/2367

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- Pege 40 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSINC BASIS f'!2CKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART U.1 STATION BLACKOUT CIIECKLIST PartU.1 Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMFNT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O v

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3  ;

I43 40 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC SLB- Page 41 of xs MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O iCive SvSa SvSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEMI

LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST

! Responsible Engineer l

1 PARTV 10 CFR50 APPENDIX R CONSIDERATION / SCREENING 1

, A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREEhlNG 1

1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

s

2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the i program / topical area within the FSAR7

. 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the i

program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) j modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions I,2, ad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and j advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP 07. If sesponse to questions 1,2, gt3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

4. O Yes O No Is the system or any cf the system components required for Appendix R safe shutdown?

i If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE, Complete Part V.I checklists. If

, "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE

TO SYSTEM.

i B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

{

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 1

i O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE 2

l . ProgramfTopical Specialist /Date:

Origina*ing Engineer /Date:

4 1

I 1

i

O l - Parsons Power Group lac. -

4 FORM: 3 1 41 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page .f 2 of xs MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST ~

Responsible lingmeer:

(System Team lead)

PARTV.I 10 CFR50 APPENDIX R CHECKLIST l

PartV.I Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature i

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT -

B, REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (l'.wess per PP-07)

C, REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT l

l

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 1 42 Package Sequence No. 4  !

Revision 2 F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

-. .. . . ~ . - .-- -. . . - - . . . _ - . - - . . - - _ _ . - - . --

DOCUMENT ID: RC.SLB- Prge 43 of xx ]

,f y MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS i

t CHECKLIST ResponsiNe Engmeer:

, (Svstem Team lead)

, PART W USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING l A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING 1, O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?

l 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo censidered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FS AR7

3. O Yes O No Has NNE a considered or addressed the potential h" pact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?

If the response to questions I,2,and 3 is "No", Dispasition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepan:y in accordance with PP.07. If j response to questions 1,2 gr 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.

O 4, O Yes O No Dms the system a id/or the components require seismic qualification / operability capability to

~ V perform a safe shutdown function?

i If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part W.I checklists. If

"No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.

B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one):

O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07 O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGPAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

4 Originating Engineer /Date:

1

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 43 Package Sequence No. 4 i

Resision 2 1

F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUP!ENT ID: RC SLB- Page 44 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Enguscr:

(System Team lead)

. PART W.1 USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST

) PartW.!

Item Review Status Requirement Grour Revicur's Signature ,

I. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:  ?

O SATISFYING INTENT OF LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT h

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 3 1 44 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 2

- F3_CLLBD. DOC 9/23/97

l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 1 CF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEMISYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR PART X SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA REVISION ATTACHED SHEETS ORIGINATOR /DATE REVIEWER /DATE APPROVED /DATE O

1 2

A DATA 'S th'

• mP "*"t "Pt've: O ves O No Component tag numbers indicated in ( ) are repe+rtive.

Component Accessories included.

ITEM DATA AS DESIGNED AS BUILT REFERENCE o w ere nte 1 MOTOR 2 Elec Channel 3 Horsepower i

4 Voltage '

5 FLA 6 KVA Code 7 Serv Factor 8 Design Life '

9 Ctrl Power SCE 10 DC Power SCE 11 AC Power SCE 12 Intertock CH 13 Manufacturer 14 Insul Class FORM. 3X-EE F3X_EEXX. DOC PackPge Sequence No: 4 Revision 2 September 23,1997

G G DATA SHEET NO. PAGE 2 OF X MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EE-DS-XXX-YYY ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR 15 Int / Cont Duty 16 SOLENOID 17 Elec Channel 18 Wattage 19 Voltage 20 Coil lnsul 21 Operation 22 Drpout Volts 23 Design Life 24 CV Rating 25 DC Power SCE 26 AC Power SCE 27 Interiock CH 28 Manufacturer 29 FORM 3X-EE Package 4 F3X_EEXX. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-) OOC-YYY P3GE 3 OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO. .

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE [

DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR  !

B.

SUMMARY

OF COMPONENT LOOP i INSTRUCTIONS: "

I The attributes below are selected based upon NNECo FSAR Licensing and Design Bases. If an attribute is answered "Yes", the licensing / design basis is satisfied. If NNECo has satisfied the attribute by special analysis or by exception, indicate that the attribute is satisfied, but include an explanation on a >

separate page. The Originator (OE) needs to include all i."..e.ce(s) for all attributes. If additional comment is required (1) indicate under references to [

"See Attached Sheet" and (2) attach a separate sheet and indicate the attribute number and additional documentation. The attached sheet shall be Identified as follows : ATTACHMENT [ the same data sheet number) - xx (xx = next consecutive unique number). Attachments shall have unique page i number as well as total. Any attribute that is answered "No," is considered as not complying with the design basis and is processed as a 2:;, ,_ - ;y in - - -

accordance with PP-07. For repetitive components list all applicable references (le Channel A Loop, B, C, D). If a difference exists between the channels or  !

trains that does not have a design and licensing basis, the attribute is answered "No." and is processed as a discrepancy in accordance with PP-07.

Component (s) satisfies licensing and design bases.

Component (s) does not satisfy licensing and design bases / discrepancy noted and processed.

ORIGINATOR DATE:

i I

i l

k FORM. 3X-EE  !

F3X_EEXX. DOC Pacf: age Sequerce No.:4  !

Revision 2 .

September 23,1997  !

G S MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 4 OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM 'IES NO N/A REFERENCE Originator /Dese ATTRIBUTE

1. Does the as-built nameplate data agree with the design documents?

2. Does the voltage calculations adequately address the component for all operating modes?

3. Does the short circuit calculation properly incorporate the load for all operating modes?

4. Is the equipment shor' circuit capabihty in accordance with calculations?

5. Do the electrical calculations use normal and accepted methodology?

6. Are the assumptions in the electrical calculations technically sound?

7. Is the cable size appropriate for the losd?

8. Is the protective device sized by calculation and appropriate?

9. Is the power supply to the safety related process cabinet property sized?

10. Is the load property accounted for in baseline loading / sizing calculations and are all operating modes considered?

11. Is the component shed or sequenced on at the appropriate times?

12. If there are fuses, is there a sizing basis?

13. If there are fuses, are they controlled?

14. If there are overloads, is there a sizing basis?

15. If there are og toads, are they controlled?

16. Are the cable deratings at any point along its' length appropriate?

17. Is the circuit feeding the component coordinated for all protective devices?

18. Does the component receive power from an appropriate (independent) power source?

19. Does a set point calculation exist for the trip or alarm point (s)?

20. Are the set point cak,ulation inputs reasonable?

21. Is the methodolog'/ and output reasonable?

FORM. 3X-EE F3X EEXXDOC

~

Package sequence No.:4 Revrsion 2 september 23.1997

DATA SHEET NC. EE-DS-XXX 'I fY PAGE S OF X MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR i

7 C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM YES NO N/A REFERENCE Originator /Dete ATTRIBUTE

22. Does sufficient margin as described in the Technical Specification exist?

23. Is the set point reflected in the appropriate test, operating and emergency procedures?

24. Is the mov part of the generic letter 89-10 program? ,

25. Is there calculations for correct torque settings using appropriate voltage value?

26. If a 89-10 valve, is the overload device appropriately included in cales?

27. Is it clear that the component is included in the SBO program?

28. If SBO component, is it included in the documentation for coping duration category?

29. If an SBO component, do the criteria and assumptions conform to the licensing basis?

30. If an SBO component does the calculations that are available support the SBO response / procedures? _

31. If the component is in an dominant area of concem (SBO) is it evaluated for the event?

32. If a valve, does the SBO program adequately address containment isolation capability?

33. Does the APP R program documentation property address the component?

34. Will a common fire effect a redundant component or cause a basis for the Fire Hazards Report or hot shutdown capability to become invalid?

35. Is the high/ low pressure bounduty for APP R oorrectly addresseG

36. Is the component included in separation / associated circuit study for APP R?

37. Is the component included in the MHIF study?

38. If an MOV, is the torque and limit switch wiring evaluated? ((

FORM. 3X-EE F3X_EEXX. DOC Package sequence No; 4 Revesion 2 september 23.1997

0 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGEO OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEMISYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM ATTRIBUTE YES NO N/A REFERENCE Origmator/Date

39. Is the component seismically qualified?

40. Is the component mounted in accordance with the design documents including minimum mechanical and electrical separation on a common rack?

41. Is the component mounted in accordance with the seismic requirements?

42. Are there any instances where seismic 2 may affect seismic 1 components, conduits (seismic 2 over 1)?

43. If EQ is the component included in the EQ program per the MEPL7

44. If EQ, does the component have a SCEW sheet that includes installed location, safety function and operating time?

45. If EQ, is the worst case environment for the component addressed for the component performance?(see EQ SCEW sheet to verify information )

46. If EQ, does the installed configuration represent the tested configuration and does it satisfy the worst case environmental conditions including submergence, if applicable?

47. If EQ, have qualified electrical seals (Conax, Namcr.etc.) been used to interface with the component?

48. If EQ, are qualified splices such as Raychem, Kerite, etc. used?

49. If EO, is the qualified life of the component adequately addressed ( see applicable SCEW sheet)?

50. If EQ, are t.. maintenance requirements included in the plant preventive maintenance (PM) program?

51. If an electrical containment penetration is used does 11 satisfy the requirements of the FSAR?

52. If an efectrical containment penetration is used is it adequately addtressed in the short circuit capability study?

FORM 3X-EE F3X_EEXX DOC Package sequence No: 4 Re.ision 2 september 23,1997

l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 7 OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE i

DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM ATTRIBUTE YES NO N/A REFERENCE Originatormate

53. Is the physical mechanical separation in the FSAR met with respect to a redundant motor / valve?

54. Is the physical electrical separation in the FSAR met with respect to a redundant cable or conduit?

55. Is the physical installation of electrical raceway in accordance with spec?

56. Is wiring separation maintained from component to safety related process cabinets in accordance with the FSAR?

57. Are redundant channels electrically independent?

58. Is separation in accordance with the FSAR from the safety related component  !

to the control power interface?

59. Is the safety related process output property interfaced to and terminated to the device / equipment required to perform the safety function?

60. Is component input signal to the safety related cabinets terminated in I accordance with design documents? _ t

61. Does the MEPL have the corTect classification and safety function for the component?  !

62. Is the component configured consistent with one-line drawings?

63. Can the required safety function be achieved?

64. Can all emerDency functions be accomplished?

65. Can all shutdown functions be accomplished ?

l

66. Does the component as-built configuration conform to startup ard preoperational state?

67. Is the component surveillance test based on acceptance tests and design change documents?

FORM. 3X-EE F3X_EEXX DOC Package sequence No.: 4 Revision 2 septamber 23.1997

l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. l EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE B OF X

, ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO. l ELECTRICAL COMPONENT

, SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM E ATTRIBUTE NO M E M NCE C'. ANe

68. Do the operatW procedures match the component tag number, description,

, set point and design change documentation?

69. Do the alarm procedures match the component tag number, description, set point and design change documentation?

M Do the emergency procedures match the compornnt tag number, desenption, setpoint and design change documentation?

71. Do the maintenance and inspedion procedures match the system components, manufacturer's recommendations and desgn change documents?

72. Are component related design changes that indude physrcal installations (se raceway, cable bends, splices, terminations and grounding) consistent with original design and well documented?

73. Is sydtchgear, MCC'S cther electrical equipment associated with, as well as the component itself instaHed and grounded in accordance with spec 7

74. For associated modifications were they in accordance with procedures witt, .he appropriate reviews and signa'ures during both the design and implementation phases?

75.

'I FORM. 3X-EE F3X_EEXX_ DOC Package sequence No : 4 Rewsen 2 september 23. W97

_ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . .- ~._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

G G MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. EE-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 9 CF X l l

ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO. l ELECTRICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE l DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION i

i SYSTEM LEAD ENGR D. SUPPLEMENTAL COMPONENT DATA '

1. Attribute No.  !

[

a. Reference (s):

[

l i i i  !

1 b. Commentis): #

i t

i

}

i Originator Date i

i  :

1 FORM 3X EE F3X_EEXX. DOC Package Secumce No; 4 l Revision 2 '

Ses*w%er 23. t997

DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE1OFX MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR PART X SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA REVISION ATTACHED SHEETS ORIGINATOR /DATE REVIEWER /DATE APPROVED /DATE O

1 2

A DATA '5 * * - * "+"t" P "Pve. O Yes O No Cui w + 4 tag numbers andmated in ( ) are repettrve LOOP Accessories Induded:

ITEM DATA AS DESIGNED AS BUILT REFERENCE cc. rm 1 Instrument Type 2 Instrument Range 3 Instr Elec Channel 4 Instr Seismic Class 5 Instr Equipment Qualifcation per EQ Prog (Yes/No) Line 1 (P.T.RH.Setsmic, RAD) Une 2 6 RG1.97per FSAR(Yes,tJo) Une 1 TypeNariable une 2 7 LOOP OUTPUT 8 Indicator (s) Range / Location 9 Computer range 10 Alarm Set Poirst(s) 11 Interlock set Point (s) (inct typc & value) 12 FORM 3X 8C F3X- ICXX. DOC Padwp Saguence No : 4 Revsen 2 August 28,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 2 OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR B.

SUMMARY

OF COMPONENT LOOP INSTRUCTIONS:

The Atributes below are selected based upon NNECo FSAR Licensing and Design Bases. If an sttribute is answered "Yes",the licensing / design basis is satisfied. If NNECo has satisfied the attribute by special analysis or by exception, indicate that the attribute is satisfied. but include an explanation on a separate page. The Originator (OE) needs to include aII reference (s) for all attributes. If additional comment is required (1) indicate under references to "See Attached Sheet" and (2) attach a separate sheet and indicate the attribute number and additional documentation. The attached sheet shall be identified as follows : ATTACHMEFT [the same data sheet number] - xx (xx = next consecutive unique number). Attachments shall have unique page number as well as total. Any attribute that is answered "No," is considered as not w..,#-;r., 1 with the design basis and is processed as a discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. For repetitive components list all applicable references (le Channel A Loop, B, C, D). If a difference exists between the channels or trains that does not have a design and licensing basis, the attribute is answered "No." and is processed as a discrepancy in a~.:ordance with PP-07.

The OE will also consider any of the following accessories or interfaces as a complete instrument loop and include the results en the same data sheet as the primary process instrument:

a. Indicator (s)

b. Recorder (s)

c. Computer point (s)

d. Alairm(s)

Add other attributes and/or loop accessories as required.

Component (s) satisfies licensing and design bases.

Component (s) does not satisfy licensing and design basest discrepancy noted and processed.

ORIGINATOR DATE:

l FORM 3X-IC F3X_ICXX DOC Package Sequmee No : 4 Reusson 2 August 28,1997

DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 3 Or x MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR

! Ce COMI JNENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM ATTRIBUTE YES NO N/A REFERENCE C4 Ne

1. Does the MEPL indicate the component electrical / seismic class in accordance with the licensing and design basis?

2. Is the instrument range sufficient to measure all normal and emergency process values?

3. Does the component envelope the system design pressure / temperature?

4 Does the as built name tag data agree with the design documents?

5. Is the orientation of the process tap, impulse tubing size and slope in accordance with the design documents?

6. Are impulse tubing blowdown, vent and manifold valves and loop accessories insta!!ed in accordance with the design documents?

7. Is the impulse tubing / piping, fittings, and instrumentation valving specified in accordance with the tubing / piping specifications?

8. If mounted on a common rack with multiple instruments, is the component mounted in accordance with the design documer.ts including minimum mechanical and electrical separation?

9. Is the component mounted on a rack / support in accordance with the design documents?

10. If applicable, is the component mounted in accordance with the vendor seismic mounting requirements?

11. If the component is seismically qualified, is the mounting support / rack seismically qualified?

12. Is the physical mechanical separation in the FSAR met with respect to a redundant instrurr. W or sensing line?

13. Is the physical electrical separation in the FSAR met with respect to a i redundant instrument or conduit?

FORM 3X4

, F3X_ICXX. DOC Packaga sequmce No : 4 Rensson 2 August 29,1997

DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 4 OF X MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW . ._

ITEM YES NO N/A KC2RENCE Orhynsearesse ATTRIBUTE

14. If the component is seismica!!y qualified, are the tubing and supports installed in accordance with the seismic / thermal tubing criteria or analysis?

Check One: Installed by criteria O Installed by analysis 0

15. Does the calibration procedure values / ranges match the component name plate?

16. Does the calibration procedure reflect the location of the laps and instrument to account for zero/ suppression?

17. If the component is in the EQ program, does the PMMS/MEPL indicate the component within the program?

18. If EQ. has the qualified verses design life been considered and property documented in the EQ document package?

19. If EQ, is the component qualified for the worst case location environmental conditions including submergence, IF APPLICABLE 7

20. If EQ, have qualified electrical seals such as Ccnax Namco, Patel, etc. been used to interface with the component?

21. If EQ, are qual:fied splices s ch as Raychem, Kerite, Okonite, etc. used (if applicable)?

22. If EO, do the preventive maintenance procedures include EQ requirements?

23. If EQ. does the installed configuration represent the "as qualified test configuration?

24. If EQ. has the minir.I.sm cable component Insulation value recorded during the accident simulation Jest) been identified and discussed in the EQ document package?

25. Is the component seismic classification in accordance with the licensing and FORM 3X-3C Pr-kage semence No : 4 F3X_ICXX. DOC Revisum 2 August 28.1997

~

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 G

DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY e

PAGE S OF x ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW tTEM ATTRIBUTE YES NO NrA REFERENCE CJ. 1Ne design basis?

26. If a mechanical containment penetration is used, does it meet the requirement of RG 1.11 and FSAR7

27. If an electrical containment penetration is used, does it satisfy the requirements of the FSAR7

? 28. If the component is redundant, are independent process connections utilized?

29. Is wiring separation maintained from component to safety related process cabinets in accordance with the FSAR7

30. Are redundant channels eledrically independerd?

31. Is component input signal ic the safety related process cabinets terminated in accordance with design documents?

32. If the component is redundant, does the component / loop receive power from an independent power source?

33. Does(Do) calculation (s) exist to demonstrate loop accuracy, drift and uncertainty for loops used to actuate / alarm a safety function or used in a maintenance or surveillance procedure? (If any of the calculation factors doesn1 apply, answer"no* . Explain on Attached sheet).

34 Does a set point calculation exist for the trip or alarm point (s)?

35. Are the set point calculation inputs reasonable?

, 36. Is the set point calculation methodology and output reasonable?

l 37. Does the set point (s) and accuracy match the values or margins as described in the Technical Specification or FSAR7

38. Is the set point reflected in the appropriate test, operating and emergency

/ alarm procedures?

39. Do interfaces (outputs) to *other non-safety related system (s)[ computer, FORM 3X-3C F3X_tCXX. DOC Package sw No 4 Revisen 2 August 28,1997

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - _ l  :.

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY FAGEC OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAli ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW irEM ATTRIBUTE E NO N/A REFERENCE N annunciator, etc.) or devices / components

• use qualified isolation devices as described in the FSA.R7

40. If a switch is used to isolate or transfer an analog signal (not within the process cabinet) for local readout, is the signal completely transferred such Laat there are no remote failure paths?

41. Are control board indicators qualified for the intended function?

42. Is the control panel (s) indicator range consistent with the procedures and design documents?

43. Is separation maintained in accordance with the FSAR from the safety related process cabinets to the control panel indicator?

44. Are the safety related process cabinet outputs terminated in accort:ance with the design documents?

45. Are the safety related process outputs property interfaced to and terminated to the device / equipment required to perform the safety function?

46. Is the required safety function of the loop / component as described in the FSAR achieved?

47. Are there any other contacts in the actuation circuit that would inhibit. (1) automatica!!y remove or block an RPS/ESFAS/AF Initiation signal?

48. Are there any instances where seismic 2 may effect seismic 1 components, (1) impulse tubes or conduits (seismic 2 over 1)?

49. Do the operating procedures match the component tag number and description?

50. Do the emergency procedures match the component tag number and description?

51. Can all described emerDency system operating functions be accomplished (via FORM. 3XJC fax _ICXX. DOC PW sequmce No : 4 Rensaart 2 August 25.1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 7 OF K ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW rie" ATTRIBUTE NO N/A REFERENCE Or%==*wNe walkdown)?

52. Do the alarm procedures match the component tag number and fundional description?

53. Can all hot shutdown procedural functions be accompitshed (via walkdown)?

54. Do the maintenance and inspection procedures follow the system component (s) manufadurer's maintenance recommendations?

55. Do the test / calibration procedures match the component tag number, description, calibration and/or set point documentation?

56. If applicable are the system human factors attributes addressed on control boards, panei, procedures and labeling?

57. Does the simu!ator operating / emergency procedures match the *as built

• control room procedures?

58. Does the simulator front view match the apr uprGte main cordrol board section?

59. Does a mechanism exist to allow logic and/or control board hardware changes to be incorporated into the simulator?

60. Will a common fire effect a redundant process variable or cause a basis for the (1)

Fire Hazards Report or hot shutdown capability to become invared?

61. Is the loop capable of being independently tested from sensor to actuated / measured component?

62. If identified in the FSAR as a RG 1.97 variable, does the component meet the requirements of RG 1.97 with respect to range, signal type, qualification and separation?

63. If air is required following a incident, has a safety related air source been provided for the loop to a!!ow the intended function to be satisfed?

FORM 3X-8C F3X_ICXX_ DOC Package Sequence No : 4 Rewman 2 August 25,1997

DATA SHEET NO. PAGE 8 OF X MILLSTONE UNIT 2 IC-DS-XXX-YYY ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW rTEM ATTRIBUTE m) wA masce c.w: ==

l

64. If a safety related air source is used, is it mounted in accordance with seismic l

mounting requirements to the first support beyond the safety dass tubing l break?

65. If a pnmary flow element is part of the loop, has the mstallation (upstream and downstream diameters) effect on loop functionality been cunGered?

Notes: (1) An affirmative response to this question should be treated as a discrepancy and processed accordance with PP-07.

FORM. 3X4C F3X_ICXXDOC Package sequence No: 4 Revisaart 2 August 28,1997 l

1 - i MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. IC-DS-XXX-YYY PAGE 9 OF X ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE COMPONENT LOOP DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION  !

SYSTEM LEAD ENGR  :

i r i

i D. SUPPLEMENTAL COMPONENT DATA t

1. ' Attribute No.  !

a. Reference (s):

I

b. Comment (s): ,

r Originator Date l

l l ,

i I'

i FORM 3X-tC 6 4

F3X_ICXXDOC Package Sequence No.:4

! [

Rension 2 August 28,1997 1

CILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. ME-DS-XXX-YYY l PAGE1 O ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO. '

MECHANICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE !

DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR PART X SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA  :

REVISION ATTACHED SHEETS OftlGINATOR/DATE REVIEWER /DATE APPROVED /DATE ,

O i 1 l 2 j A DATA IS the component repetitive: 0 Yes O no component tag numbers indicated in ( ) are repetitive.

Component Accessones included.

ITEM DATA AS DESIGNED AS BUILT REFERENCE orhPa *re

• 1 PUMP

• 2 Capac::y, GPM 3 TDH, ft.  :

4 NPSH Rqd. ft. ,

5 Min. Flow. GPM 6 VALVE 7 ANSI Class 8 Diff Press. psi 9 Stroke, sec 10 Cv 19 Type  !

12 F3X_MEXX. DOC Package Sequence No . 4 '

Rensson 2 -

se# ember 23.1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. ME-DS-XXX-YYY l PAGE2 O ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

MECHANICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE i DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR B.

SUMMARY

OF COMPONENT LOOP INSTRUCTIONS The attributes below are selected based upon NNECo FSAR Licensing and Design Bases. If an attribute is answered "Yes", the licensing / design basis is satisfied. If NNECo has satisfied the attribute by special analysis or by exception, indicate that the attribute is satisfied. but include an explanation on a separate page. The Originator (OE) needs to include aII reference (s) for att attributes. If additional comer:ent is required (1) indicate under references to  !

"See Attached Sheet" and (2) attach a separate sheet and indicate the attribute number and additional documentation. The attached sheet shall be i identified as follows : ATTACHMENT [ the same data sheet number] - xx (xx = next consecutive unique numter). Attachments shall have unique page i number as well as total. Any attribute that is answered "No," is considered as not complying wP.h the design basis and is processed as a discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. For repetitive components list all applicable AL. m (le Channel A Loop, B, C, D). If a difference exists between the channels or trains that does not have a design and licensing basis, the attribute is answered "No.* and is processed as a discrepancy in accordance with PP47. j Component (s) satisfies licensing and design bases.

O component (s) does not satisfy nicensing and design basest discrepancy noted ane processed.

ORIGINATOR DATE:

i FORM 3X-ME  :

F3 ,'AEXX. DOC Packaga Sequence No : 4

• f l Revisen 2 l Septerter 23,1997 l i

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. ME-DS-XXX-YYY l MGE 3 OFX ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

MECHANICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR s.

C. COMPONENT A: TRIBUTE R NIEW ITEM YES NO N/A REFERENCE c4_ enee ATTRIBUTE

1. Does the pump performance bound the performance used for any accident analysis?

2. Is adequate NPSH provided at runout flow conditions ?

3- Is adequate NPSH provided at minimum suction source level 7

4. Is the driver horsepower adequate for runout / maximum pump operation ?

5. Has reverse flow protection been provided for multi-pump insta!!ations 7

6. Has minimum flow protection been provided and does it meet the vendor's recommendat%ns ?

7. Do the operating or maintenance instructions provide for filling and venting of the pump after maintenance or extended outages 7

8. Does the suction pipe arrangt. prevent vapor fonnation or air entrainment 7

9. Is the pump protected from overpressure from a leaking discharge valve if required 7

10. Is the pressure / temperature rating adequate for the design of the piping 7

11. Does the ISI program demonstrate the required performance for the component 7

12. Has the component been seismically qualified 7

13. Has the operability of active components been demonstrated by test or analysis 7

14. Is the component performance consistent with FSAR data 7

15. For two isolation valves in series have two controllpower trains been used to j assure isolation with a single failure 7 16- Does the valve operator provide adequate closing thrust for maximum conditions 7

17. Have 89-10 program requirements been met for the valve ?

FORM. 3X-ME F3X_MEXX DOC Packaga segumce No; 4 Revesson 2 september 23.1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. ME-DS-XXX-YYY l PACEO O ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

MECHANICAL COMPONENT SYSTEM / SYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR C. COMPONENT ATTRIBUTE REVIEW ITEM ATTRIBUTE NO N/A REFERENCE Origmesoreuse

18. Does the Cv for the valve meet or exceed that used in system calculations ?

19. Do the operat'og procedures match the component tag number, description.

Vendor Manu al Operating Requirements or other documentation ?

20. Do the emergency procedures match the component tag number, description, or other documentation?

21. Has the component been procured or evaluated to meet the worst case environmental conditions for its location?

22. If actuator air is required following an incident, has a safety related air source, tubing, valves, etc. been provided to assure the fundion is satisfied?

23. Has pressure locking and thermal expansion effeds on the valve been considered ?

24. Does the component performance meet any applicable Tech Spec requirements ?

25. Have cooling water or any other required suppo:t systems been induded in the cystem in'erfaces ?

26. Does the MEPL have the corred dassification and safety fundion for the component ?

27. Do air operated valves have the correct failure position on a loss of air 7

28. Do the maintenance instructions for the component incorporate the vendor manual requirements ?

FOR1WL 3X ME F3X_MEXX. DOC Parksge sequence No : 4 Raresor: 2 septee.eer 23.1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 DATA SHEET NO. ME-DS-XXX-YYY l PAGE S OF x ICAVP SVSR COMPONENT TAG NO.

MECHANICAL COMPONENT SYSTEMISYSTEM CODE DATA SHEET DESCRIPTION SYSTEM LEAD ENGR D. SUPPLEMENTAL COMPONENT DATA

1. Attribute No.

a. Reference (s):

b. Comment (s):

Originator Date FORR 3X-ME Package Sequence 4 F3X_MEXX. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 411 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CllECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK g3 PROJECTI IDENTIFIER:

m JOS NOJ WBS No.t SUBJECT DEsiON lhPUT DISCIPLINE: CLAS$1FICATION:

CHECKUST WCLEAR PAGE2OF PmoJacts APPLICABLE DESIGN INPili REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR PROJrcTg:

(f) (N) (if Yes, complete orptenation, including references, on DIR, Form cr13. Note. Rems 1. 2 and 3 are appicatne)

/ (1) Scope / Bas 6c functions of structure, system or component

/ (2) Performance requirements, input servtces (alr, electricity) as well as outputs (capacRy, rating)

/ (3) Codes Standards, and regutatory requirements including appleatdo 6ssue an&or addenda D D (4) Desgn Conditons such as temperature, pressure, fluid, chemistry and voRage D O (5) Loads such as sesmic, wind, thermal and dynamm D D (6) Envuonmental condamns antcipated, such as pressure, temperature, humiday, corrosiveness, site elevaton, wind directen, nuclear radiation, electromagnetc radiaten, and duraton of exposure including 10CFR50 49 appleaton D D (7) Interface requwements and constructabilty including definition of the functonal and physical interisces including structures, systems, and components D D (8) Matenal requirements such items as compatibilty, electricalinsulaton properties, protective coating, and corrosion resistance D O (9) Mechanical requirements such as vibraton, stress, shock and reacton forces D D (10) Structural requ rements covenng such items as equipment foundstons and pipe supports D D (11) Hydraulc requirernents such as NPSH, allowable pressure drops, and flu 6d veloctes D D (12) Chemistry requvements such as provtssons for samphng and bmitations on water chemistry D D (13) Electncal requrements such as source of power, voltage, raceway requirements, electrical insulaton, motor requirements, loafvoltage studes and EDG loading D D (14) Layout and arrangement requrements 3 0 (15) Operational requuements under vanous coridttons such as piant start-up, normal plant operston, plant shutdown, pMt g emergency operation, special or infrequent operaton, and system abnormal or emergency operation

{ .I O (16) instrumentation and control requaements including indsatng instruments, controls and alarms requwod for operaten, testing and maintenance.

D D (17) Access and administrative control requirements required for plant securtty D D (18) Redundancy, dresty, and separaton requirenard .

D D (19) Failure effects t.4uvements including of those events which they must withstand D D (20) Test requwenents including pre operational and subsequent penode in-plant and the conditon under which they must operate D D (21) Accessibility, maintenance, repair and in-service inspecten requirements D D (22) Personnel requirements and limttations D D (23) Tmnsportabikty requnements such as stre and shipping weight O O (24) Fire protecten or fue resstance requnements D D p5) Handling, storage, cleaning and shipping requirements D D (26) Other requirements to prevent undue nsk to the health arid safety of puble O C (27) Matenais, processes, parts, and equipment auttable for applicaten D D (28) Safety requwements for preventing personnel injury D D (29) Quality and quality assurance requwements D D (30) Reliability requnements including their interactons, which may impair safety D D (31) Interface requvements between plant equipment and operaton and maintenance personnel D D (K) Requwements for entcality control and accountabihty of special nuclear matenals D D (33) Special ALARA consideratens D D (34) Special human factors consideratons D D (35) High Energy Line Breaks are affected D D (36) Flooding D D (37) Missiles D D (38) 10CFR50 Appendix R, including Safe Shutdown Anapis D D (39) Setsme Category il over i O O (40) Special HVAC requirements D D (41) Staten Blackout Anatysis

.D D (42) Post Accident Monit:,, reg Requirements D (43) OTHER requrements, as necessary THIS IS A DESIGN RECORD Form EP12 12/H

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.79 Revision 2 Pbol. DOC Septemter 23, I997

. . _