ML20211E337

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to T1-CL-I-09, Sys Review Checklist Instructions Testing - Form 9
ML20211E337
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1997
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20211E051 List:
References
T1-CL-I-09, T1-CL-I-9, NUDOCS 9709300102
Download: ML20211E337 (20)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION P1-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O

T1-CL-I-09 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS TESTING - FORM 9 O

Sienatutg. DJLtc l Prepared: 4t/Au #/[M!'f(

Reviewed: w\- / .r p SYSR C4)uLead ' Y l

Approved: /940 _ / )/9 dr/9g Appioved: f/fd /97 Der 6tyMject Director / '

O P O 3b PDR

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.100 Revision 2 Pl.01.!XX' 9 September 23,1997

l MILL 4 TONE UNIT 2 SYS2PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 9 - SYSTEM TESTING REVIEW CllECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:

  • Validate compliance of the NNECo hiodification Design Process and results relating to testing; l e Evaluate testing against the licensing bases including the technical specifications to determine compliance; and l
  • Document the results to demonstrate whether the requirement has been incorporated.

l 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.

1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Part A.

1.4 The TLE in concert with the OE will review the specific checklist requirements l and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Pan E through G, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer / inspector's name to each specific checklist requirement.

O V 1.5 The OE interfaces with the modification reviewers to obtain the list of applicable modifications and completes Pan C adding the appropriate NNECo modification number, modification title, and Parsons modification review checklist identification number, 1.6 Procedure Checklist Requirements (Pan E through G) 1.6.1 Using the applicable NNECo hiodification Package (s) noted in Part C and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Parts E through G of the Checklist following any additional instructions included in Pan D.

1.6.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is prosided.

1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in suflicient detail. The OE/'mspector determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used only if required.

1.6.4 Upon completion of resiew of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instmetions in Part D, signs and dates the

- Panone Power Group Inc. -

N .101 Revision 2 PI 01. DOC September 23.1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSR P2.OJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK w specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

l.7 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer / inspector inputs are included for i cach requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector signature, and (3) date.

l 1.8 The OE submits the fonn and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Parts E through G that are dispositioned as a

" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a summar/disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing ad dating the form.

1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in i

accordance with the General Instmetions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document.

2.0 CHECKLIST REYlEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate the specific checklist questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questions and

/ requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Overview Plans, and SSFl/IDI procedures.

2.2 The system review team (SLE, TLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will l use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected system.

2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook,

- Persons Power Group lac. -

P1 102 Revision 2 P141. DOC Sep mber23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2P2OJECTINSTRUCTION Pl.01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK TRAINING AND TESTING CilECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS

1. Testing is reviewed using the following checklist (s) and the results of the review are recorded on Form 9,
2. The Testing Lead Engineer (TLE) shall use the following questions / requirements l as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
3. The TLE, OE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and l completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: These questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and does not require the TLE, OE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system.

4. If applicable, the TLE, OE may use other checklist question contained in the l licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A.

A TRAINING PROCEDURES Do the training procedures reflect the present plant configuration?

Do the training procedures reflect the current plant configurations and equipment of the system?

Review the operator training procedure for the system for technical completeness. Ensure that the training procedures incorporate system modifications and that the operators are trained on the modifications.

Determine ifimplementing personnel receive adequate training for the system and if the training is consistent with the level of detail in the implementing procedures.

  • lias the Simulator been updated to reflect modifications to the unit?

- Psnons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.103 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC -

September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK B. PRE-OPERATION AND POST MAINTENANCE TESTING e

Verify that the Pr, operational or post maintenance test and acceptance criteria l demonstrated that the System met the required critical performance / functional requirements.

e Verify the system alignment and test conditions demonstrate performance functional / requirements.

Review calculations used to establish test results acceptance criteria for acceptable analytical approach and correct testing configuration.

  • Verify that the Design Basis information was correctly incorporated into the pre-operational testing procedures with appropriate acceptance criteria.

The reviewer should determine if the system has been adequately tested to demonstrate that it can perform the intended safety function. This review should include initial tests performed by the manufacturer, start up testing and pre-operational testing.

  • Review the program for post maintenance testing of components prior to declaring them operable. The post modification testing should demonstrate that the system functional capability has been restored / maintained.

Review the measuring and test equipment requirements to ensure the p)

(

equipment can measure the parameter to the accuracy necessary to assure proper operation.

Review the testing procedures to ensure that the method for measuring the parameter is appropriate for the physical condition of the plant.

  • Review post test data reduction and analysis. Are the results of the analysis consistent with test conditions / assumptions and recognized analytical methods?

Does the post test analysis satisfy test acceptance criteria?

e Review data sheets for signatures of personnel performing the test (s).

C. SURVEILLANCE AND PERIODIC TESTING e

Verify that the procedure satisfies the requirements contained in technical specifications, the FS AR, and the current licensing basis and design basis.

Verify the test conditions accurately reflect actual plant conditions during system critical function operations.

Detenaine if system modifications identified by Tier 1 review process were incorporated in the procedure.

O

- Panons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.104 Revision 2 PI 01. DOC September 23, !997

DOCUMENT ID: RC. TEST. Page 1 of :

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODEl ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM TESTING l

CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team Irad)

PART A TESTING CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION I REVISION 2 s mtw sw msw sw imaw

1. ORIGINATOR
2. REVIEWED - - -

Mechanicallead Electrical Lead Control Systems Lead Piping / Structural Lead Opera' ions Engineer Procedures Engmect Testing Engmeer

3. APPROVAL - - -

System Icad Engineer C SYSR Lead Engmeer PART B SYSTEM TESTING OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS

SUMMARY

Instructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached checklist and supplemental nalerial and indicate whether NNECo inservice inspection and Testing adequately considered or incorporated the Indicated requirements into the system.

(2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP 07.

REVISION O REVISION 1 REVISION 2

1. llave the inservice inspections and tests es O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No as they relate to the system satisfactorily incorporated or nill be incorporated into the system design?
2. Summary of Discrepancy (les) Items Signature SLE/Date

.v

- Parsons Poner Group Inc. -

FORM: 9 l-09. I Package Sequence No.10 Resision 2 f9_CLT. DOC 9/23/97

l l

DOCUMENT ID: RC. TEST. Page .2 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM TESTING CIIECKLIST Responsible IMgmeer:

muumuuammensumamusumut PART C APPLICAHLE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS Instructions: (l) The TLE summerlies the applicable modincetions that may effect the system prmedures and indicates l them below.

Note: Only these modi 6 cations afTecting the system are to be reviewed 'Ihe input is provided from the system modancation chedlist.

1. APPLICAHLE MODIFICATIONS The following modincations are applicable and need to be reviewed agelnst the checkilst requirements and licen Ing basis:

NNEco Mod Reference Modincation item Number Modincation Title Review Checulit 1.

O O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 9 l-09 2 Package Sequence No.10 Resiolon 2 F9_CLT. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC. TEST. Page 3 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM TESTING CilECKLIST Respormble Lnpnect:

(System Team Iend)

PART D CHECKLIST REVIEW INSTRUCTION Instructions: For each requirement listed in EgI11 through fatLQ below:

(1) SLE, TLE, OE and system team deselops the specine requiresnents to be reviewed using the generic l questions in the lastruction and Attachment A Source ik>ok.13111 requirement will be given a new item number and include steps A, B, C, and D.

(2) Each requirement will be consecutively numbered starting with 1 (one).

(3) The lead Englacer will assign the function group responsible for reviewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M. Electrical = E. Controls = I AC. Testing = T. Procedures = P. Operations = 0 (4) The individual that reviews the requirement will sinn and date., provide a disposition, indicated laterfaces, and provide a response based upon Ge following:

a. Yes Requirement is satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No esplanation/results is required.
b. No Requirement is not satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, revision and date,if applicable. If an RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the neference RAI number and subsequent NNECo response reference is to be prmided. Provide en esplanation of how you concluded the requirement was not sationed. Include reference source, revision, and date. lf applicable. Disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible individual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP-07 will be by de OE.
c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Esplanation should be included only ifit clarines the disposition.
d. INF Requirement could not be serined because information could not be found, include a statement under results that indicate; the infor nation could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY The responsible Individual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Pniject Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.

Note: System reglew to consider test procedures, results, and/or calibrations.

O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 9 l-09 3 PacLage Sequence No.10 Revision 2 F9 CLT. DOC 9/23/97

l DOCUMENT ID: RC TEST. Page i.glu MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM TESTING CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer:

PART E TRAINING AND TESTING PROCEDURES Parte Resiew Requireenent item Group Status Resiewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA D INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT o

v

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 9 I-09 4 Package Sequence No.10 Resision 2

. F9_CLT. DOC 9/13/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC. TEST. Pcg2 5 of us l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM TESTING CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeer; (System Team lead)

PART F PRE-OPERATIONAL AND POST TESTING I

PortF Ret 6ew Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS C DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

O V D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT t

U

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 9 149-5 Package Sequence No.10 Revision 2 F9_CLT. DOC 9/23/97

. - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - . - . . - _ - . --- ___ -_-___ =_ . -

DOCUMENT ID: RC. TEST. Pcge .6 of MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

, SYSTEM TESTING CilECKLIST Responsible lingineer:

(Svetem Team lead)

PART G SIJRVEILLANCE AND PERIODIC TESTING PartG Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT H. REOUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISITING TIIE LICENSING / DESIGN HASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE:

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT l

l l

(3

%J

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 9 l-09 6 Package Sequence No.10 Rethion 2 F9,CLT DOC 9/23/97

. - = , . . . , - _-- - , .

MIL 1MONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK l

T1-CL-I-10 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS WALKDOWN - FORM 10 o

U Eignature lhls Prepared: MM/4 W 9/a3 '/

Reviewed: [ P(/

Approved: r/[ >

Approved: 9/2g/17 Depyff14ofect Director ' '

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.105 Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMEh TATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 10- SYSTEM WALKDOWN REVIEW CHECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:

  • Provide in plant review of system configuration; l e Evaluate status of physical system configuration against design documents and requirements; and l

e Document the results to demonstrate whether the requirement has been incorporated.

l 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.

1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Part A.

1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will review the specific checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) reviewer, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part C, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer / inspector's name to each specific checklist regiirement.

p\ 1.5 The OE uses the modification summary listing (Form 6) to obtain a list of modifications that must be walked down. Additionally, the OE walks down the system for any system changes not reflected in the current configuration drawings.

Unmodified portions of the system shall be walked down to confirm conformance with the P&lD. Piping supports type, general location, and l configuration shall also be verified.

Modified portions of the system shall be walked down in detail to verify that the as built condition conforms with the design base drawings and documents, including verification of-

a. Support type, location (dimensional verification), and configuration.
b. Instrument line route, supports, and slopes.
c. Separation and support of raceways carrying circuits of the modified portion of the selected systems.

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

P1 106 Revision 2 l'l.01.1XE September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE tlNIT 2 SYS3PZOJECTINSTRt1CTION PI el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.6 Procedure Checklist Requirements (Part C) 1.6.1 Using the applicable NNECo Modification Package (s) noted in Form 6 and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Part C of the Checklist following any additional instruction included in Part C.

1.6.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient detail. The OE/ inspector determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used only if required.

1.6.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part C, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

1.7 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer / inspector inputs are included for each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector signature, and (3) date, The OE counts the number of pages and enters the O' appropriate total in the header box of the form.

1.8 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Part C that are dispositioned as a " Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a summary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form.

1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document.

2.0 CIIECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate tho specific checklist questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questiom and requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Overview Plans, and S9Fl/IDI procedures.

2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these requirements / questions to generate the systern specific review requirements for the selected system.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.107 Revision 2 Pl.01.1XX:

September 23,1997--

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKNOOK 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the resiew team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook.

O O

- Persons Power Group Inc. ---

Pi 108 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2PROJECTINSTRUCT12N PI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK i

WALKDOWN (AS-BUILT VERIFICATION)

CIIECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS

1. The unit's system configuration is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 10. The modifications selected for review are listed on Form 6.
2. The System Lead Engineer shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: These questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the O

O selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist question contained in the licensing basis checklist or Appendix A.

A.WALKDOWN

  • Does the FSAR text description reflect the system "as built" configuration, for the systems (excluding figures)?
  • Verify that equipment ( including valves and instrumentation ) nameplate data is consistent with specifications and analysis.

Verify the location and type of pipe restraints installed against the piping analysis and Design Specifications.

  • Confirm physical separation of systems.
  • Confirm Electrical and Control channel separation of systems.

Verify that the System is adequately protected from fire, missiles, pipe rupture / whip, flooding and other hazards.

  • Verify that the systems and components located above the system being reviewed are seismically supported.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.109 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS'3PZOJECTINSTRUCTIIN PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CllECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

()

  • Note any Modifications that appear to have had recent installation activity.

This information shall be r oted on the checklist and shall be passed on to the SLE who will determine if further review per the Modification Checklist (Form 7) of this procedure is required.

Verify that the current latest revision of P&lDs, One Line Diagrams, Elementary and other critical drawings are available for reference by plant operations.

Verify that critical control room drawings reflect partially installed rnodifications which are tumed over to operations.

Verify the capability to perform local operation or equipment and the l availability ofindication for local operation is in accordance with the operating procedures. Emironmental conditions tnat will exist in the area under post accident conditions should be considered in determining the capability to perform local operation.

  • Perform a detailed verification to assure that the system as-built ccnfiguration agrees with the P&lD. The verification should include a review of the following characteristics of the system:
1. Access to system components requiring local operation and accurate labeling? '
2. Are motor operated valves and check valves installed in the orientation (n) required (or qualified as an active component) by the manufacturer?
3. Are the As-built physical ( Isometric ) piping drawings and the P&lD consistent?

e Verify the intmity of the fire barriers and/or wraps associated with the system.

Verify the intyrity of rated (fire, pressure, radiation) w all penetration associated with the system?

e Verify housekeeping type of hazards such as combustible, unrestrained scaffolding, tool box, etc. in proximity to safety related or seismic components.

V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.I10 Revision 2 P14LIXX' September 23,1997

DOCUMENT IDI RC WALK. Page.I of us MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM WALKDOWN CIIECKLIST Responsible lingmect:

(System Team 1. cad) l PART A WALKDOWN CIIECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 sw i-sww aw - m.w n. .tww I. ORIGINATOR

2. REVIEWED - - -

Mechanical Lead Electrical Lead Control Systems lead hping/ Structural Lead Operations Engineer Procedures Engineer Testing Engineer

3. APPROVAL - - -

System Lead Engtre SVSR Lead Engineer PART B SYSTEM WALKDOWN OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS

SUMMARY

Instructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached checklist and supplemental material and indicate whether the *as built" conditions are in conformance with the applicable system design documentation.

(2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP-07.

REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVl510N 2

1. Does the as built conditions reflect the O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No design documentation as it relates to the system?
2. Summary of Dit" - pancy(les) Items Signature SLE/!hite

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 10 110 1 Package Sequence No. ?! l Revision 2 F10 CLWR. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC. WALK. l' age .2 of us MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

l O iC^ve svsn SYSTEM WALKDOWN svsreul CIIECKLIST Responsible Engmeer; PART C WALKDOWN CIIECKLIST lastructions: For each requirement listed below:

l (t) GLE, SLE, OE and system team develops the specine requirements to be reviewed using the generic questions in the Instruction and Attachment A Source Book Lp,.tti requirement will be given a new item number and include steps A B, C, and D.

(2) Each requirement will be consecutitely number starting with I (one).

(3) De system lead Engineer will assign the function group responsible for reviewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M. Electrical = E. Controls = lac, Testing = T. Procedures = P. Operations = 0 (4) The Individual that reviens the requirement will sign and date., provide a disposition, Indicated interfaces, and provide a response based upon the following:

a. Yes Requirement is satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No esplanation/results is required.
b. No Requirement is not satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, restslon and date,if applicable. If an RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the reference RAI number and subsequent NNECo response reference is to be provided. Provide an explanation of how you concluded the requirement w as not estioned. Include reference source, revision, and date.. lf applicable. Disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responalble individual shallimmediately advise

, the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY, Initiation of Project

[ Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.

\ c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Esplanation should be int aded only ifit clarines the disposition.

d. INF Requirement could not be serined because information could not be found. Include a statement under results that indicates the information could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responilble individual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initletion of Project Procedure PP.

07 mill be by the OE.

PartC Review Requirement item Group Stttus Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOlllREMENT H. JtE0111REMENTIS CONSIDERED ASt O SATISFYING TIIE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCF(S)& SOURCFJ REVISION / DATEt I

(

- Persons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 10 110 2 Package Sequence No. I1 l Flo,,CLWB. DOC Revision 2 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.WAt& Page 3 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM WALKDOWN CilECKLIST Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team lead)

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT O

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 10 110 3 Package Sequence No.11 l Resision 2 F10_CLWB. DOC 9/23/97 J

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211E337&oldid=3302825"