ML20211E263

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to Tl-CL-I-04, Sys Corrective Action Checklist Instructions - Form 4
ML20211E263
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1997
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20211E051 List:
References
T1-CL-I-04, T1-CL-I-4, NUDOCS 9709300079
Download: ML20211E263 (7)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKHOOK T1-CL-I-04 SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 4 O

fiignalutt. Dalt Prepared: / 8/ff/#4w 'Ih,!9'/

9 8 Reviewed: -

sisR 6 Leaa /

Approved: 94 4 9/> r/97

'aFer Cornpany Quahty '

Approved: ,7/24,4 h 8!14/'N

'g,. %dty/ Project Dacetor

( [k khoh 0 ho 6

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.80 Revision 2 P!41 IXX' September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 4 - SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CilECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:

Provide review of the NNECo Correction Actions (CAP)

  • Document the results to assure that the CAP adequately addresses the items requiring corrective action 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the rerponsible SLE. Each corrective action requires a separate form and document ID number, 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Pan A.

1.4 The SLE in concert with the OE will review the specific checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part C, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /mspector's name to each specific checklist requirement.

1.5 Checklist Requirement (Part C) 1.5.1 Using the NNECo CAP and other inputs documents as applicable, the OE completes Part C of the form.

1.5.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.5.3 The CAP checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient detail.

The OE/ inspector determine the depth of the review, Wordy paragraphs are to be used only if required.

1.5.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part C, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

1.6 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer /mspector inputs are included for each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector signature, and (3) date. The OE counts the number of pages and enters the appropriate total in the header box of the form.

1.7 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Part C that are dispositioned as a " Discrepancy." The

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl . 81 Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK SLE completes Part B by providing a summary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form.

1.8 The OE of the form reviews each of the individual requirements in Part C that are dispositioned as a " Discrepancy" and indicates the requirement number in Part B of the form.

1.9 The OE cubmits the form and checklist to the interface reviewers in accordance with .ae General Instmetions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document.

2.0 Each Corrective Action associated with the selected system will be placed on a separate form.

2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used ta generate the specific checklist questions to be incorporated onto the fornt These que'tions and requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Overvicw Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures.

2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will

\ use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected system.

2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook.

f'N U

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

Pl.82 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILT 3 TONE UNIT 2 SYS3 PROJECT INSTRUCTI',N PI-01 TR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

,.~

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM CilECKLIST QUESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Corrective actions are reviewed using the following checklist and the results are recorded on Form 4.
2. The SLE shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and does not require the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system, c

4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist questions contained in the licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A.

. is the problem clearly identified?

e Does the solution identify the root cause?

. lias the deficiency been corrected?

If the deficiency has not been corrected is there acceptable documentation that justifies restart without the correction being completed?

Does the solution address any generic or programmatic ssues?

llave the corrective actions been adequately documented and any required configuration control document changes made?

  • ls the corrective action technically and programmatically acceptable?
  • Does the corrective action include procedure or process changes to prevent recurrence?

O d

- Parsons Power Group inc. -

P1 83 Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

I DOCUMENT ID: RC.CA. P:ge .1 of us MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CAP Number CilECKLIST CAP Title Responsible Engmect:

(System Team lead)

PART A CORRECTIVE ACTION CllECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION O REVISION 1 REVISION 2 bar netwo.T)ste nasneewetnote $4rneturs14te

1. ORIGINATOR
2. REVIEWED - -

Mecharucal Lead Electncallead Control Systems lead Piping / Structural Lead Operations Engineer Procedures Engineer Testin;. Engineer

3. APPROVAL - - -

System Lead Engineer SYSR lead Engineer PARTH SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PROGRAM OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS

SUMMARY

Instructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached ches Lijst and supplementu material and indicate whether the NNECo Correcthe Action Program adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirements into the s) stem.

(2) For each DISCREPANCY found during t.ie audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision sad assur e oil discrepancies are processed per PP-07.

REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2

1. Is the correcthe action satisfactorily 0 Yes O No O Yes O No r4 .'es O No incorporated or will be incorporated into the system design?
2. Summary of Discrepancy (les) Items Signature SLE/Date O

- Persons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 4 1-04 1 Package Sequence No. 5 Retision 2 F4_CLCB. DOC 9/23,9 7

DOCUMENT ID: RC CA- Page 2 of u MILLSTONE UNIT 2 system CODEt ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CAP Number ClIECKLIST CAP Title Responsible Engtncer:

(System Team lead)

PART C CIIECKLIST REVIEW INSTRUCTION Instructions: For each regulrement listed below:

(1) GLE, SLE, OE and system team deselops the specific requirements to be reviewed using the generic questions in the Instruction and Attachment A Source Book. Egih requirement will be given a new item number and include steps A, B, C, and D.

(2) Each requirement will be consecuthely number starting with I (one).

(3) The system lead Engineer will assign the function group responsible for reviewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M. Electrical = E, Controls = IAC Testing = T. Precedures = P Operations = 0 (4) The indhidual that reviews the requirement will sinn and date., prmide a disposition, Indicated interfaces, and provide a response based upon the following:

a. Yes Requirement is satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No esplanation/results is required.
b. No Requirement is not satisfactorily addressed. Include reference nurce, revision and date,if applicable, if an RAI was generated to clarify the requirement,,he reference RAI number and subsequent NNECo response reference is to be provided. Prmidi en explanation of how you concluded the requirement was not satisfied. Include reference sorce, revision, and date.,if applicable. Disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible inds,Muni thallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initletion of Project

' Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.

c. NA Requirenient is not applicable. Esplanation should be included only ifit clarlfles the disposition,
d. INF Requirement could not be terified because information could not be found. Include a statement under results that indicates th$ information could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible indhidual shallimmediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.

PartD Review Requirement item Group Status Reviewer's Signature

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT B. REOt!IREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS,1 0 SATISFYING Tile LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C, REFERENCE (S) & SOllRCE/ REVISION / DATE:

Os D. REV1EW SIIMMARY/RESITI,T U

~ Persons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 4 104 2 Package Sequence No. 5 Resisjon 2 F4 CLCILDOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC.CA. Pcge .3 of in l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

O iCive stsR svsTEMI SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CAP Number CIIECKLIST CAP Title Responsible Enginect; (System Team Lead)

O O - Persons Power Group lec, -

FORM: 4 1-04 3 Package Sequence No. 5 Revlilon 2 F4 CLCB. DOC 9/23/97

_ - _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211E263&oldid=3302874"