ML20211E095

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to PI-01, Sys Vertical Slice Review (Svsr) Project Instruction:Svsr Implementation Checklists & Workbook
ML20211E095
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1997
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20211E051 List:
References
PI-01, PI-1, NUDOCS 9709300038
Download: ML20211E095 (39)
v • d • e


Text

. - _ .. . . . . . _ - -- .. . . .. . . - . . - __ -

1 4

i i U

SYSTEM VERTICAL SLICE REVIEW (SVSR)

PROJECT INSTRUCTION l

)

PI-01 l

O sysR imetemenririOs cuecKtisrs i AND WORKBOOK l

l l

Signature Dgg Prepaed: #M#W f/23!97 Reviewed: =

~

f[,tf[//

l Approved: 9M i[9 7 l h 'ager Co ,any Quality Approved: d2 / h' '

/ft/17

/

p %t1[y Pfoject Director

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI41. DOC "*

September 2 ,1997 k[3gbhg050 em36 e g

1 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

( TABLE OF CONTENTS Section lific Pagt 1.0 PURPOSE iv l 2.0 DEFINITIONS 1 3.0 OVERVIEW 3 l 4.0 REQUIRED INPUTS (PREREQUISITES) 12 4.1 Required from NNECo: 12 4.2 Required from Tier 2 Review Team: 12 4.3 Required from Regulatory Review Team: 12 4.4 Required from Tier 3 Team 12 5.0 PROCESS 13 5.0.1 General 13 5.0.2 SVSR Verification and Validation 13 5.0.3 Use of Site Team 13 5.0.4 SYSR Instructions and Forms 13 5.0.5 Interfaces with Other Tier / Regulatory Review Teams 14 5.0.6 Review Boundaries 14 O 5.0.7 Initial Actions 15 5.1 Modification Review, Scope and Boundary 16 5.2 Determine Licensing Bases 18 5.3 Prepare System Specific Checklists / Requirements 19 5.4 System Design Input and Licensing Design Bases 20 5.5 Programmatic / Topical Review 22 5.6 Corrective Action Checklist 23 5.7 Modification Screening Review 24 5.8 System Modification Review 25 5.9 Operating Procedures Review 26 5.10 Training and Testing Review 27 5.11 As Built (Walkdown) Review 29 5.12 Tier 1 SVSR Review Close-out 30 5.13 ICAVP Report 31

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

i Revision 2 PI4)l. DOC Sept tnber 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS

! Sectior. Title PAEt

! 6.0 WORKBOOK FORMS 32 6.1 General 32 SYSTEM SCOPE AND BOUNDARY INSTRUCTIONS - FORM I 34 SYSTEM LICENSING BASES CURRENT DESIGN LISTING INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 2 37

' SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 3 39 SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS -

FORM 4 80l SYSTEM MODIFICATION

SUMMARY

SCREENING INSTRUCTIONS -

FORM.* 84l SYSTEM MODIFICATION

SUMMARY

LISTING INSTRUCTIONS -

FORM 6 86l 4

SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS -

l FORM 7 88l SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING 4

l' PROCEDURES - FORM 8 95l SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS TESTING -

FORM 9 100l 1 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS WALKDOWN -

FORM 10 105

, SYSTEM REVIEW CLOSE-OUT INSTRUCTIONS - FORM CO 111 EXHIBITS i Exhibit 3-1 ICVAP Implementation Activities 5 Exhibit 3-2 SVSR Checklist Requirements (Confirmatory Order) 6 Exhibit 3-3 SYSR Check Requirements (Oversight Inspection 4

Plan Actions 7 ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A SVSR Source Book of Additional Questions

- P&rsons Power Group Inc. -

ii Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-ol SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK REVISIONS Section Erlhlon No. Description pgg All 0 InitialIssue June 09,1997 All 1 Revisions June 30,1997

All 2 Revisions September 23,1997 1

l 1

NOTE: PI-01 and associated checklists (Forms CO,1 10) are being reissued in

their entirety as Revision 2. All revisions l are notal with a " revision bar"in the right hand margin. The Source Book (Attachment A)is not being resised. Page i revisions are as noted under effective Pages.

^\

1 I

i O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

iii Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHFCKLISTS AND WORKBOOK LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES PareNo. Revision No. Paec No. Revision No.

i 2 43 2 ii 2 44 2 iii 2 45 2 iv 2 46 2 y 2 47 2 1 2 48 2 2 2 49 2 3 2 50 2 4 2 51 2 5 2 52 2

_ 6 2 53 2 7 2 54 2 8 2 55 2 9 2 56 2 10 2 57 2 11 2 58 2 12 2 59 2 13 2 60 2 14 2 61 2 15 2 62 2 16 2 63 2 17 2 64 9 18 19 20 2

2 65 66 2

2 2

2 67 2 21 2 68 2 22 2 69 2 23 2 70 2 24 2 71 2 25 2 72 2 26 2 73 -2 27 2 74 2 28 2 Form 3 2 29 2 75 2 30 2 76 2 31 2 77 2 32 2 78 2 33 2 Form 4 2 34 2 79 2 Form 1 2 80 2 35 2 81 2 36 2 Fonn5 2 Form 2 2 82 2 37 2 83 2 38 2 Form 6 2 39 2 84 2 40 2 85 2 41 2 9 42 2 86 87 2 2

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

iv Revision 2 PI4)llXX' September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION P1-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1

e LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES V

Pane No, Revision No. Pane No. Revision No, i'8 2 89 2

. 90 2 91 2 92 2 93 2 94 2 Form 7 2 95 2  ;

% 2 l 97 2 98 2 I

i 99 2  !

Form 8 2 100 2 101 2 102 2 103 2 104 2

, 105 2 1

Form 9 2 '

p)

(

106 107 107a 2

2 2

]

l 108 2 109 2 110 2 Form 10 2 111 2

[ l12 2 CO 2

, ATTACHMENT A SB-47 1 SB-48 1 All other pages Revision 0 NOTE: PI-01 and associated checklists (Forms CO,1 10) are being reissued in their entirety as Revision 2. All resisions are noted with a " revision bar"in the right hand margin. The Source Book (Attachment A) is not being revised. Page revisions are as noted under effective

pages.

t 2

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

v Revision 2 Pl.01. DOC September 23,1997

.. . -. - . _ - . ~ .. .

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCT13N Pl 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 PURPOSE Provide a process for systematically defining the selected system scope and boundary conditions through the use of system functions and critical design characteristics of the selected system.

This workbook provides the instructions and documentation to be used by the ,

System Vertical Slice Resiew (SVSR) team during the course of the Millstone Unit 2 audit. This workbook is intended to r pplement Project Procedure PP-01 and provide the detail directions necessary to assure a thorough and consistent review process.

2.0 DEFINITIONS

a. SYSR Group Leader Engineer (GLE) - The individual responsible to direct and lead the Tier 1 SVSR review team effort,
b. SVSR System Lead Engineer (SLE) - The individual responsible to develop, direct, and perform the scope of the system audit. The System Lead Engineer is selected by the SVSR Group Lead Engineer with the concurrence of the Deputy Project Director.
c. Deouty Project Director - The individual who is responsible to assure
~

compliance to the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Audit Plan and the technical adequacy of the final reports.

d. Originating Engineer (OE) - The individual assigned the responsibility to l complete a particular task or function.
c. Discipline Lead Engineer (LE) - The individual responsible for directing the collection, analysis, and processing of audit data including the review of the technical adequacy of the checklist responses prepared by the OE's, reviewers, and/or specialists. This individual may also function to provide 4

discipline interface ruiew.

f. Operations Lead Engineer (OLE) - The individual assigned to collect,

! analyze and review data associated with plant operations. This individual may also function to provide operations interface review.

g. Maintenance Lead Engineer (MLE) - The individual assigned to collect, analyze and review data associated with plant maintenance. This individual may also function to provide maintenance interface review.

O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 1 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

I MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ,

SYS3P'OJECTINSTRUCTI3N PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

('~S")- h. Testing Lead Engineer (TLE) - The individual assigned to collect, analyze and review data associated with plant testing and training. This individual may also function to provide testing and training interface review. j

i. Specialist - The individual who has a particular exrertise required to resiew program / topical areas and/or provide technical consulting.
j. Reviewer - The individual who reviews or inspects documents and is responsible to provide input for a checklist item.
k. BAl- Request for additionalinformation. This is the formal process to l obtain additional information from NNECo in response to a particular SYSR request.
1. Discrepancy - A condition, such as an error, omission, or oversight which l t

prevents consistence among the physical configuration, information sources (e.g. documentation and databases), design basis and/or regulatory requirements.- Discrepancies are processed in accordance with Project Procedure PP-07. l 3 m. Modification - Any documented method that alloivs a change to be made to l q the licensing or design basis of the plant.

V

n. Minor Modification - A documented package that does not change the l licensing or design basis of the plant.
o. Current Licensing Basis (CLB)is the set of NRC requirements applicable l to a specific plant and a licensee's written commitments for ensuring compliance with and operation within applicable NRC requirements and the plant-specific design basis (including all modifications and additions to such commitments over the life of the license) that are docketed and in effect.

The CLB includes the NRC regulations contained in 10 CFR Parts 2,19, 20, 21, 26, 30, 40, 50, 51, 54, 55, 70, 72, 73,100 and appendices thereto; orders, license conditions; exemptions; and technical specifications. It also includes the plant specific design-basis information defined in 10 CFR 50.2 as documented in the most recent final safety analysis report (FSAR) as required by 10 CFR 50.71 and the licensing correspondence such as

~

licensee responses to NRC Bulletins, generic letters, and enforcement actions, as well as licensee commitments documented in NRC safety evaluations or licensee event reports.'

p. Design Basis That information that identifies the specific functions to be l

performed by a structure, system, or component of a facility and the (D

-() ' 10 CFR 51.3 (a)

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 2 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

- . . . - - - _ - . _ _--_ .. _. _~

ff' as MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

( specific values or ranges of values chosen for controlling parameters as

{

reference bounds for design. These values may be (1) restraints derived I from generally accepted state-of-the-an practices for achieving functional goals or (2) requirements derived from analysis (based on calculation i and/or experiments) of the effects of a postulated acc! dent for which a structure, system, or component must meet its functional goals.'

3.0 OVERVIEW This workbook provides a generic framework based on checklist modules that can be used to develop and conduct a system specific Design Bases and l Configuration Management Assessment checklist to support the System Vertical i Slice Reviews (SVSRs). Exhibit 3-1 provides an overview of the generic SVSR l checklist development process. The SVSR is based on the process outlined in )

Exhibit 3-1, which identifies the system specific licensing requirements and l

commitments, and the generic checklist modules in this workbook.

=

1 i

The generic checklist modules in this workbook are based on the requirements of 1 the Confirmatory Order, the NRC Oversight Inspection Plan, and NRC  !

Inspection Guidelines. Exhibits 3-2 and 3-3 provides matrices to cross reference of Confirmatory Order and NRC Oversight Plan requirements to the generic checklist modules included in this workbook.

(

4 All checklist modules contained in this workbook are generic and applicable to a variety of systems. After system identification by the NRC, the generic modules are used as the framework to incorporate system specific considerations. A requirement will be reviewed to a level that verifies it complies with its licensing basis.

The SVSR checklist development process noted in Exhibit 3-1 is used to prepare a system specific checklist by defin:ng system boundaries, identifying licensing and design requirements, and identifying configuration management considerations.

4 A

(/ 2 10 CFR50.2

- Parsons Power Group Inc. - l PI 3 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 I

SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK i

-V Generic checklist modules guidance provided in this workbcok that supports checklist development includes:
  • System Scope and Boundary l
  • - Licensing and Design Basis Requirements 4

e Modifications e Corrective Action Plan

. Testing and Maintenance E e Operating Procedures e Walkdowns t

The responsible SLE will prepare a workbook for egh selected system. Each workbook is comprised of various types offorms and a System Close-out I

checklist that are prepared in the sequence indicated in the SVSR review work process.

1 After the systems for review have been selected, the generic forms contained in

this workbook will b . expanded to make " system specific" workbooks.
- Applicable checklist / review requirements will be added to cover the areas

! (N discussed in the NRC Order, Oversight Plan and applicable Standard Review

d Plan (SRP) topics.

f

- The directions given in the instructions in this workbook will be used by the i

SVSR teams to govern the methodology and provide a standard documentation format for each system. Where a confl ct in the instmetions exists, the Deputy Project Director _will resolve the discrepancy.

4 l

E l

i i

O l

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

i f

PI- 4 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION Pl.01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK bh t/

I lll h' s i, >

.a

~

E -..I!.l u

s

!! g l*

g a

""' u  ! !

-' ~

- "C{Eg*gl' llll Ihli J i,li! l l!!. s'llll 2 i,

. . . l . i.

a a i  : e 5 C

n M  : jill -+ J E' liji -i:

i i =.i. M '

!!il

< g -

=s -

y Q z T "Cj;g,i !  !*-i ~

gg-o  ;@ >

[52;3 1

el 4

!!!! !w a

, l um sunu Mau usui 0  :  ;

t e  :  : . E i,; > s 7 ' i sgl a 'i -

' I.k F- l:

-: ,a

-4

!lI mi - ,

^

G

tit  ; ..

!'i

  • 5 j55:n its si l l g!"

mummme  !

!  ! ri n l- l 15 l l5: 'l  :

i E!h! ,

. - p 9 kI l.........!E!l ] 8

  • ! I nv di

- Parseas Power Group Inc. -

Pl. 5 Revisim 2 l PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK (3

G Exhibit 3 2 SV8R Checklist Requirements AREA

'8 $ I

  • E s 6 Confirmatory Order Actions y, m ee j n.

j W 2 3 g

a8f a g

o. E=

Licensee committed to the scope of the ICAVP review encompassing modifications to the selected systems since initial licensing, including :

Review engineering design X X Review configuration control processes X X X Verify current as-modified plant conditions against design basis X X X Verify current as-modified plant conditions against licensing basis documentation X X X Verify that design requirements are translated into operating procedures X Verify that design requirements are translated Into mainterant', procedures X Verify that design requirements are translated into test procedures y A Verify that licensing bases is translated V into operating procedures Verify that licensing bases are translated into maintenance procedures X Verify that licensing bases is translated into test procedures y Verify system performance through review of specific test records X Verify system performance through observation of selected testing of particular systems X Review proposed and implemented corrective actions for Licensee-identified design deficiencies X O

v

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI - 6 Revision 2 FI.01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTICN PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK (p{ Exhlt't 3 3

\v' SVSR Checklist Requirements AREA _

'8h PS a n. E @= b Oversight inspection Plan Actions

} g }S 3y Q.

Design modifications are adequate X Control of the design has been maintained since issuance of the initial operating X license Control of the design bases has been maintained since issuance of the initial X X operating license System's current configuration conforms to its licensing bases and will be capable of X X X performing its intended function System's original design that has not been modified conforms to its licensing bases and X X X will be capable of performing its intended function System modifications made since issuance of the initial operating license conform to its

('} licensing bases and will be capable of

's / performing its intersded function Verify that the licensee's design engineers had efficient technical guidance to perform X X assigned engineering functions.

Verify that the regulatory requirements are correctly implemented and the system can X X X perform its specified functions g Verify that the licensing-bases are correctly j implemented and the system can perform X X X 4 its specified functions The updated Final Safety Aaalysis Report (FSAR) accurately reflects the current X X licensing bases, The updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) accurately reflects the current plant X X configuration The updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) accurately reflects the operational X X X characteristics The analyzed facility configuration in the design bases is consistent with the current X X plant configuration of the unit The analyzed facility configuration in the design bases is consistent with the current X X X

/9 plant operational characteristics of the unit Q)

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

1 Pi - 7 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILIATONE UNIT 2 -

.. _ SYSR PR3JECTINSTRUCTICN FI SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK AREA Oversight inspection Plan Actions h -

The conect licensing-bases information has 6 1 1 been reflected in the maintenance - X procedures -

The correct licensing-bases information has been reflected in the responsible X engineering procedures The conect licensing-bases information has X

been reflected in the operations procedures System design changes have not .

invalidated preoperationaltesting. X' X System design changes have not X X invalidated startup acceptance Design controls have been applied t temporary modifications design chan0es X 1 Design controls have been applied to design X

procedure changes ,

O y

Design controls have been applied t change the configuration of the facility, Design controls have been applied to X X j

change the operation of the fac!Iity.

X- X Verify the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions as past of the CMP and in X X response to the ICAVP findings.

Assess the adequacy of the licensee's effectiveness of implementation of the -

X X corrective actions developed as part of the CMP and in response to the ICAVP findings.

Review of procedural controls for modifying or changing the facility operational - X X characteristics.

Verify tlW current configuration accurately reflects the licensing-bases, including the X X updated FSAR.

The calculations and analyses were performed using recognized and acceptable X X analytical methods.

The assumptions made in calculations supportina the change are technically -X X sound-The :.ssumptions made in analysis __ _ _ _

f supporting the change are technically l sound.

X X

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

Pl . 8 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC' September 23,1997

+

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION Pi 0t.

SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

-AR

- Oversight inspection Plan Actions h

The results of calculations supporting the unmodified portions of the original configuration and design changes are X reasonable (based on engineering i jud0ement) for the scope of the chan08.

The results of analysis supporting the unmodified portions of the original configuration and design changes are X reasonable (based on engineering jud0ement) for the scope of the change.

The licensee considered the effect of a change on design margins. X- X The appropriate level of engineering and management review existed during the X X desiqn phase and prior to implementation.

The licensee considered the effect of a.

change on pre-operational acceptance test X X results.

O

\

The licensee considered the effect of a change to startup acceptance test results. X X The licensee considered the effect of a change to system baseline accepance test X X '

results.

Design changes were accomplished in accordance with the licensee's approved - X X procedures.-

Design changes are accurately reflected in

. operating procedures.

X X Design changes are accurately reflected in maintenance procedures. X- X '

Design changes are accurately reflected in test procedures X X Design changes are accurately reflected in training materials. X X Proposed design chan0es, subsequently cancelled, were not replaced by procedural y changes that imposed excessive burdens on pylt operators.

The walkdowns will. be multi-disciplinary -

reviews including, as a minimum, -

Mechanical systems, X Mechanical components, X Electrical power, X h

(/

Civil and structural design, and Instrumentation and control.

X X

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pt 9 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

(' --.

AREA e6 Oversight inspection Plan Actions h y a, 3 Walkdowns will verify adequate control of X

surveillance procedures Walkdowns will vedfy adequate control of X

operating procedures, Walkdowns will verify adequate control of X

maintenance procedures, Walkdowns will verify adequate control of X

test procedures, Walkdowns will verify adequate control of y operator training, Walkdowns will verify adequate control of X

plant simulator configuration.

Verify that the current configuration is .

consistent with the licensing bases at the -

level of detail contained in Piping and instrumentation diagrams '

X X X (P&lDs)

O Verify that the current configuration is d  ! consistent with the licensing bases at the X X level of detail contained in piping isometric drawings Verify that the current configuration is consistent with the licensing bases at the X X level of detail contained in electrical single-line diagrams Verify that the current configuration is consistent with the licensing bases at the level of detail contained in emergency, X X X abnormal, and normal operating procedures.

Vedfy the licensing-bases information X

contained in the upriated FSAR.

Verify the licensing-bases information X

contained in docketed correspondence.

Verify the analyzed configuration is consistent with the current plant X X configuration.

Verify equipment location and identification X

numbers are as indicated on the P&lD Verify equipment name plate data is X

consistent with design specifications.

Verify equipment name plate data is X

consistent with analyses.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI-10 Rcvision 2 M-01M September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01

. WSR IMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O

Q

, AREA se Oversight inspection Plan Actiom. -

h -

Verify that the location of pipe supports, d .

snubbers, and other p.pe restraints are X consistent with design specifications.

Verify that the location of pipe supports, snubbers, and other pipe restraints are X consistent piping stress analyses.

Veriff that divisional separation of safety-related systems, structures and components, seismic II/l, and other topics addressed by the licensee's hazards X analyses are reflected in the current plant configuration.

Mullfications that appear to have been

, cor.ipleted recently will oe screened to X assure adequste documentation D

N

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 11 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September:3,1997

i.

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

()

V l This workbook is comprised of the following:

a. Activities Flow Chart
b. Insuuc', ions
c. Workbook Form.=

4,0 REQUIRED INPUTS (Prerequisites) 4.1 Required from NNECo:  %

a. List of Modifications and Descriptions
b. P&ID
c. FSAR
d. UFSAR
e. Technical Specification
f. Safety Evaluation Report (SER)
g. Procedures
h. Corrective Action Program Information and Data
i. Selected System Documents such as:

n . Elementaries d e e

Logics Control Loops e Physical Drawings e Component Drawings

  • Specifications / Data Sheets
  • System Description l

e Design Base 4.2 Reauired from Tier 2 Review Team:

a. Critical Design Characteristics 4.3 Required from Regulatory Review Team:
a. Regulatory Review Input
b. Commitments
c. Licensing Basis Evaluatica Support 4.4 Required from Tier 3 Team
a. Summary of NNECo procedural process

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 12 Revision 2 PMt. DOC September 23,1997 l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR P OJECTINSTRUCTION PI el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5,0 PROCESS 5.0.1 General Each system will be reviewed in accordance with the work flow activities indicated in Exhibit 3 1 and in accordance with the associated system instructions and documentation contained in this workbook. When the process requires the use of a workbook form, the detailed direction will be provided under the heading " FORMS." The process description will only make mention of the need to complete the associated form.

5.0.2 SVSR Verification and Validatio.n The inspection activities based on Independent Corrective Action Verificadon Program (ICVAP) requirements shown in Exhibit 3-1 will be implemented through the use of Generic Checklists, modified as necessary to provide System l Specific Checklists. The checklist is comprised of a series of previously developed cl:eries to guide the inspection.

Typical iequirements and questions for a Specific Checklist are contained in the appropriate Checklist Instruction, Attachment A provides additional" detailed" p level questions that the SLE may used in formulating the system specific Q. inspection requirements. Additional questions will be added during the inspection as CC ' nstances warrant.

5.0.3 Use of Site Team The primary functions of the site team will be to provide system walkdown support, to provide daily document collection for the home office based review l

team and to assist the home office in obtaining 'or clarifying information. The site team is considered an extension of the home oflice review team.

CommunSation between the site and home oflice review team is considered as intemal and will be treated in accordance with the project procedures.

5.0.4 SVSR Instructions and Forms The inspection process and the use of the checklists will be documented throughout the use of Tier i Review Forms and concluded with the System Review Close-out (Form CO). The review will be documented in the various checklist instructions listed below which are part of this workbook.

Instruction litic

'g "rCL-I 01 System Scope and Boundary Instructions TI-CL-I-02 System Licensing Bases Current Design Instructions

- Parsons Power Croup Inc. -

PI- 13 Revision 2 I PI-01. DOC September 23,1997 l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PZOJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK TI-CL-I 03 System Review Checklist Instructions l TI-CL-I-04 System Corrective Action Checklist Instructions ..

TI-CL-I-05 System Modification Summary Screening Instructions TI-CL-I-06 System Modification Summary Listing Instructions T1-CL-I-07 Systern Modification Review Checklist Instructions TI CL-I-08 System Review Checklist Instructions - Operating l Procedures T1-CL-I 09 System Review Checklist Instructions - Testing Procedures TI-CL-I-10 System Review Checklist Instructions - Walkdown TI-CL-I-CO System Review Close-out Instructions 5.0.5 Interfaces with Other Tier / Regulatory Review Teams The Tier 1 review team will receive inputs from the Regulatory Review and Tier 2 review teams. This input will be used by the Tier 1 team in establishing the current licensing and design bases for the Unit and to establish the critical characteristics required of the system to support the accident analysis. A form will be used by these groups for this purpote. Tier 1 SVSR uses this information, adds additional information as required and returns the form to the l originating group. The following outlines the process for this interface:

p a. The SLE assigns an individual (OE) to be responsible for providing Q b.

information, The OE completes the form by providing the requested missing information

c. The OE signs, dates and returns the forms to the applicable group.

5.0.6 Review Boundaries A 100% review of the system against licensing and design basis shall be

' performed during Tier 1. The review will include (but not be limited to) mechanical, electrical, I&C, and civil / structural requirements such as calculations, analyses, assumptions, and conclusions. Appropriate design documents and data for the selected system and the system components shall be reviewed to the extent necessary to verify 100% of the selected system requirements.

For repetitive, standard, or identical functional components the verification will include a screening process to confirm that the components are repetitive and identical followed by validation cf the licensing or design basis requirement using a component group process.

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 14 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

i MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR P!.OJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK -

5.0.7 Initial Actiold

. After the systems are selected, the GLE in concert with the Deputy Project Director selects the responsible SLE's.

  • The GLE in conjunction with the responsible SLE's and LE's selects the l system review teams from the pool of SYSR team engineers and specialists to best match the indisidual skill levels.

The SLE assures that the team members have been indoctrinated in accordance with the Project Administrative Manual (PAM).

e The SLE selects an Originating Engineer (OE) for each Form and'or functional area to be reviewed. The SLE can function as both the OE and Approver ifindependent review is provided.

O O

- Panons Power Group lac. -

Pl .15 - Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILISTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

_' 5.1 - System Scone and Boundarv l

5.1.1 Purpose Document the review of system interfaces and the determination of system boundary.

5.1.2 Prerequisites / Documents e FSAR e P&ID 5.1.3 Determine System Boundary Interfaces with, and portions of, other systems will be included within the boundary of the selected system to the extent they are necessary to support the functional requirements of the selected system. System boundaries may be defmed at appropriate components that provide physical isolation, as long as the selected boundary does not split the component between systems. All passive devices such as supports and restraints, within the system boundary are included within the scope of the SVSR.

The extent of support system boundaries for mechanical, electrical, I&C, structural and piping are defined in PP-01 and included in the instruction for Instruction TI-CL-I-01.

5.1.3.1 Determine the system functional requirements.

l 5.1.3.2 Review the simplified P&ID prepared by Tier 2 team to assure the system boundary includes the critical portions shown on the Tier 2 drawing.

5.1.3.3 Review system boundary definition with the NRC and resolve differences prior -l to proceeding. NNECo may participate in the boundary review if the NRC determines their participation is required.

5.1.4 Complete and document the System Scope and Boundary using Workbook l Form 1.

5.1.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.

4 5.1.6 When the modification reviews are completed, the SLE will prepare a simplified P&ID summarizing the portions of the system that have been modified. The modified portions will be highlighted with a oifferent color.

O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 16 Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION P1-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

~

S.I.7 Revise and issue Form 1 to incorporate the simplified P&ID showing the applicable major modification.

O 4

O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 17 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

. - . . . - - _ . .. .~-- . - . . - ~_ . . . . - . - - .

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.2 Determine Licensinn Bases 5.2.1- Purpose Document the listing of Licensing Basis Requirements.

5.2.2 Prerequisites / Documents:

  • The Current FSAR l e The Current Technical Specifications
  • The Current Accident Analysis Calculations
  • Regulatory Review Team Input
  • Critical Design Characterittics-(Tier 2) l 5.2.3 The OE, review team and specialists review the current revision of the FSAR l l

and docketed correspondence, license amendments, and technical specification l

, made since the initial operating license to determine the current licensing bases for the selected system; documenting the results using Workbook Form 2. i 5.2.4 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.

a 4

i

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 18 Revision 2 PI-01. DOL September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N PI el

- SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKUSTS ann WOPS.BOOY.

5.3 - . Prepare System Specific Checklists /Reauirements

'5.3.1 Purpose Provide a mechanism for the customization of the generic checklists into specific system and supporting syrtem related review checklists that are (1) in agreement .

- with the boundary definition and (2) allow fer a systematic review and assessment of checklist requirements.

5.3.2 Prerequisites / Documents

a. List of Modifications and Other Formal Documented Changes (including proposed, in process, temporary, implemented, canceled) b List of Corrective Actions
c. Boundary Definitica
d. List of Procedures 5.3.3 The SLE in concert with the LE, review team and specialists reviews the system l modifications, licensing bases, NNECo Corrective Action Program, and NRC Order together with the typical review questions contained in the appropriate instruction in this workbook. - Dased upon these reviews the team modifies the generic checklists into specific system and supporting system checklists. The O* following checklists will be customized based upon this review: l
a. Corrective Action Modifications
b. Design Input and Licensing Basis c, Component Data Sheets -

d.- Modifications

e. Operating Procedures
f. Testing and Maintenance Procedures
g. Walkdowns '

O

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 19 Revision 2

. MIN September 23,1997

j 9 +

- MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS11PROJECTINSTRUCTI'JN PI41 h, '

sysK IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

. 5.4 System Review l

'5.4.1 - Purpose Document and verify that the selected system complies with the current unit Licensing and Design Basis requirements.

5.4.2 Prerequisites / Documents l

  • Design Spscifications e Design Input Documents +

e- System Scope and Boundary Documentation e Critical Design Characteristics Documentation e Original Design Specifications

  • ICAVP Regulatory Requirements / Commitments Documentation List of A/E Identified Design Deficiencies Issued at Initial Startup e Performance Calculations
  • Technical Specifications -

e FSAR.

Applicable Codes, Standards, and Regulatory Guides e Accident Analysis Calculations

  • Equipment Specifications e Instrument Setpoint/ Calculations e

Design Guides / Design Standards etc. prepared by or for NNECo. 1

  • - Design Basis Documentation as dermed by hWECo e Inventory of System Components

-5.4.3 The OE in concert with reviewers from other disciplines completes the checklist l

- and reviews each requirement at the system level in accordance with the System Review Checklist (Form 3 Part C).

5.4.4 The OE assigned to a component completes the component data sheets obtaining input from other disciplines or specialists as required (Form 3 Part X).

5.4.5 The SLE may ele:t to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or l other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular

- requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and

- incorporating the inputs of others.

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 20 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS Ai4D WORKBOOK O 5.4.6 . Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l s

9 0

O

- Persons Power Group lac. -

PI- 21 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997 {

l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SY!GPROJECTINSTRUCTCN Pl-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTArl0N CHECKLLSTS AND WORKBOOK 5.5 Progrt'nmatic/ Topical Review 5.5.1 Purpose Document and verify the correct application of the applicable programmatic / topical areas as part of the selected system level review.

5.5.2 Each of the selected systems will be reviewed with respect to the following l NNECo programmatic / topical areas:

3 A;.ticipated Transients Without SCRAM (ATWS) e Control Room Design Review e Enwonmental Qualification of Electrical Equipmem (EQ)

. Erosion / Corrosion

  • External Events /11azards e

Generic Letter 8910 (MOV) e 11eavy Loads e liigh and Moderate Encrgy Line Breaks (IIELB/MELB) e Inservice Inspection e Inservice Tesdng/10 CFR50 Appendix J Testing e IPEEE e Master Equipment and Parts List (MEPL)

Ov e Regulatory Guide 1.97 Compliance e Separation / Independence / Diversity e Set Point Control e Single Failure e Station Blackout

USl A-46 Seismic Qualification 5.5.3 Each program / topic in addressed by a separate Part of the System Review l Checklist. The OE preparcs the checklist and reviews each requirement at the system level in accordance with the program being reviewed (Form 3 Parts E through W).

5.5.4 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular reouirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs of others.

6 5.5.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.

O

- Persons Power C oup inc. -

PI- 22 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2PZOJECTINSTRUCT12N PI 411 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.6 Corrective Action Checklig 5.6.1 Purpose Document the review and assessment of proposed and implemented corrective actions for design deficiencies identified by NNECo during the implementation of the Configuration Management Corrective Action Program.

5.6.2 Prerequisites / Documents

a. NRC Significant Action List
b. NNECo Corrective Action Plan / List 5.6.3 The OE, review team and specialists review the system specific NNECo Corrective Actions and documents the results using the System Corrective l Action Checklist Form 4.

5.6.4 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to specialists or l other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs of others.

5.6.5 Prepare a separate Checklist for each corrective action being reviewed. l 5.6.6 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l 0

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

PI 23 -Revision 2 Plat. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTl!N PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORKilOOK A

5.7 hiodification Screening Review

{}

5.7.1 Purpose Provide a mechanism to screct. e son modifications and to identify those l l modifications that do not effect the licensing or design basis of the unit. l 5.7.2 Prerequisites / Documents l

e List of NNECo modifications and associated descriptions i 5.7.3 Using the Unit's modification lists and descriptions, the OE determines which I modifications are applicable to the system being reviewed, and lists all applicable i modifications including those that have been canceled or in process.

5.7.4 The OE, review team and specialists review the list of system modifications and l perform modification screening; documenting the results using Workbook Form

5. hiodification screening is performed to identify minor modifications that do not efTect the licensing basis. l 5//.5 The OE completes a modification screening form (Form 5) for each applicable l system modification.

(O) 5.7.6 Any modification that passes the screening questions will be reviewed in l accordance with the system specific modification checklist. hiodifications that are in process or canceled also will be screened and summarized. Workbook Form 6 is used to summarize the applicable modifications to be used for the detail review.

5.7.7 Request a copy of each modification package contained in the hiodification Listing Summary from NNECo.

5,7.8 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l f

v

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.24 Revision 2 P141 JXX' September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS~1PROJECTINSTRUCTIEN Pi-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CilECKLISTS AND WORK 1100K

( ) 5.8 System hiodification Review 5.8.1 Purpose l

Provide a mechanism for the systematic resiew and assessment of modifications contained in the hiodification Summary Listing for the subject system to verify the maintenance of configuratic,n control since the initial operating license.

l 5.8.2 hiodifications may include any of the following types of NNECo documents:  !

  • Design Change Records e hiinor hiodifications I
  • Maintenance Support Engineering Evaluations
  • Setpoint Change Records l

e item Equivalency Evaluations (formerly Replacement item Evaluations) 5.8.3 Prerequisites / Documents List of hiodifications (Proposed, implemented, canceled, temporary)

  • Design Control Procedures
  • Copies ofhiodifications and all Change Attachments (N
  • Program / Topical Area Applicability b

5.8.4 The OE prepares the checklist and reviews each modification contained in the System hiodification Summary Listing, (Form 6) in accordance with the System Modification Review Checklist (Form 7).

5.8.5 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to specialists or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE tetains responsibility for completing the resiew and incorporating the inputs of others.

5.8.6 Prepare a separate hiodification Checklist for each modification being reviewed.

5.8.7 Based upon system modification resiew, the OE marks up a copy of the simplified P&ID to indicate which portions of the system have been changed by the modification. The modification number is included next to the marked-up portion of the P&ID associated with the modification. When the simplified P&ID resiew is completed it is forwarded to the SLE.

5.8.8 Obtain interfacing signatures nd approvals. l fm N

- brions Power Group Inc. -

PI 25 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ._ _ .- ._ _ . _. _ _.. _ __ __ .~ -

1 MILLSTONE tlNIT 2  ;

SYS3 PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41  !

( SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK

( 5.9 Operatinn Proc (dures Revim l 5.9.1 Purpose Provide a process for the systematic review and assessment of the system related operating and maintenance procedures.

5.9.2 Prerequisites / Documents e Operating Procedures

. Abnormal Operation Procedures e Emergency Procedures e Alarm Response Procedures i e Maintenance Procedures t

  • Pre , Post Operating Testing Procedures i

e Operations Critical Diagrams  !

  • Functional / Logic Diagrams j

. Input from Modification Reviews

O 5.9.3 The OE prepares the checklist and reviews the applicable operating and '

emergency procedures associated with the applicable system to verify that applicable modifications are reflected in the current operating procedures; documenting the results in accordance with the specific Procedure Review i

Checklist (Form 8).

5.9.4 The Procedures Lead Engineer assures the input required to complete the system and component level checklists (Fonn 3 Part C and X) is provided, i

! 5.9.5 The Procedures Lead Engineer consults with the SLE to assure that the operating procedures do not permit operation in an unanalyzed condition.

l 5.9.6 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or _

~

l other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs of others.

5.9.7 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.

l

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

i PI.26 Revision 2 1%I. DOC September 23,1997

L 6

4

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKNOOK 5.10 Itaining and Testina Resiew 5.10.1 Purpose Prmide a process for the systematic review and assessment of training and testing requirements for the selected system by evaluating
  • Training Procedures
  • Test Acceptance Criteria and Basis

. Testing Conditions, and System Boundary Considerations

  • Test Performance and Documentation e Post Testing Review and Evaluation l

5.10.2 Prerequisites / Documents

  • Training Procedures l
  • Pre-Operation Test Procedures
  • Pre-Operation Test Results e Ma 8ntenance Tests e Maintenance Test Results e Sun >eillance Testing Procedures
  • Sunreillance Testing Results j e Calculations related to testing
  • Completed Critical Function Checklist

. Input from Modification Reviews 5.10.3 The OE prepares the checklist and reviews the applicable training and test procedures associated with the applicable system to verify that applicable

, modifications are reflected in the current operating procedures; clocumenting the resulis in accordance with the System Specific Test Review Checklist (Form 9).

5.10.4 The Testing Lead Engineer assures the input required to complete the system and component level checklists (Form 3 Part C and X) is provided.

5.10.5 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or l other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that panicular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for corapleting the review and incorporating the inputs of others.

- Persons Power Group inc. -

P! 27 Revision 2 P141. DOC Sepember 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCFlON PI 41

$YSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS11i AND WORKBOOK O $.10.6 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l O

O

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

Pl.28 Revision 2 1401M September 23,1997

____.____--a

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PZOJECTINSTRUCTION Pi 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.11 As Built (Walkdown) Review 5.11.1 Purpose Provide a process for the systematic identification of requirements for system walkdowns to verify the physical plant installation, primary drawing information, and the implementation of the configuration management program.

5.11.2 Prerequisites / Documents

  • P&lDs e Piping Physical Drawings (Isometrics)
  • One Line Diagrams
  • Elementaries e Instrument Loop Drawings
  • Instrument Installation Drawings
  • Specifications
  • Requirements / Commitments List from other Primary Checklists and q Discipline Checklist Requiring Verification D

5.11.3 The OE prepr.res the checklist and verifies the existing plant physical arrangement associated with the applicable system to verify that as built condition match the current plant design documentation; documenting the results in accordance with the System Specific Walkdown Review Checklist (Form 10). The OE will modify this checklist as the review progresses based upon home office review team input.

5.11.4 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement.

The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs of others.

5.11.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.

O

- Persons Power Group Inc. -

PI 29 Revision 2

4 MILLSTCNE tlNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRtlCTION PI 81 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.12 Tier 1 SVSR Resiew Close-out j 5.12.1 The SLE is responsible to verify that all items and reviews required by the NRC Order have been completed by the system review team and completes the Tier 1

System Review Close-out (Form CO). j

, 5.12.2 The SYSR GLE and Deputy Project Director approve that the system review is j completed.

i l

1 d

i 1

iO I

1 i

O

- Persons Power Group lac. -

Pl.30 Revision 2 PI41. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION Pi el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.13 ICAVP Report Prepare Tier 1 input to the final ICAVP report in accordance with the format and direction from the Project Director.

O O

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 3 I Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

4 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTISN Pl.01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 6.0 WORKBOOK FORMS After the system specific checklists are prepared the workbook will be comprised of the appropriate forms including a System Review Close-out Checklist. The purpose of this section is to provide instructions for the completion of the workbook forms. The forms are assembled using the sequence number on the lower right hand corner ofeach form.

6.1 General 6.1.1 Form Document identification shall have the following format:

[ Form Typcl-(NNECo System Alpha ID] . [ Parsons Unique Number] l For example:

LBCD.MS-01 Licensing Bases Current Design for Main Steam System RC-CA-MS-01 Corrective Action Checklist for Main Steam System Parsons' Form Document Identification starts at 01. Each form will have the document ID filled out. l 6.1.2 The OE(s) reviews NNECo documents to the level required to answer a specific requirement and/or question. The forms may be used to document the depth of the review and the reference source (s).

6.1.3 The interface reviewers and specialists review the OE's response (s) only to the level required to assure that the requirement and/or question is satisfactorily dispositioned.

6.1.4 Interface Review and App.myAl 6.1.4.1 When the resiew is completed, the OE presents the completed form including any supplemental documents to each of the discipline reviewers and or specialists.

6.1,4.2 The OE resolves any interface review comments.

6.1.4.3 The discipline leads and or specialist sign and date in Part A to indicate their interface review is ^ompleted.

6,1.4.4 The OE presents the completed form to the SVSR SLE and GLE for approval.

6.1.4.5 The OE resolves any Approver comments and reviews these with the interface reviewers to assure that the change will not impact their reviews.

- Persons Poner Group loc -

Pl.32 Revision 2 Pl4t. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O 6.1.4.6 The SVSR SLE and GLE sign and date Part A to indicate their approval. The form is considered completed after obtaining the required Approval signatures.

6.1.5 Form Revision 6.1.5.1 After a form has been approved further changes will be via revision. Each revision will be noted with a revision bar and the change noted.

6.1.5.2 Review and approval requires the same process as indicated above.

O o

v

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

P1 33 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC Sepember 23,1997

- _ _ _ _ -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211E095&oldid=3302953"