ML20211E308

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to T1-CL-I-07, Sys Mod Review Checklist Instructions - Form 7
ML20211E308
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1997
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20211E051 List:
References
T1-CL-I-07, T1-CL-I-7, NUDOCS 9709300092
Download: ML20211E308 (16)
v • d • e


Text

-_ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ - - - - - -

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK T1-CL-I-07 SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 7 1

O Signature Date Prepared: Nf&.2-- - 7[2k7 Reviewed:

O 9fA /

S 'SR'Clojp Lead /

Approved: 14 0 m 7/_)i/Sp M '

Company (7udisty Approved: 2. 92//Q/s f/24/97 Dep%1'foj4ct Director 9709300092 970926 PDR P ADOCK 05000336 PDR

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 88 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC qtp September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTlHN PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O

Q 1.0 FORM 7 - SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:

  • Provide review of the NNECo Modification Design Process; e

Evaluate the modification to ensure that configuration management has been considered; and Document the results of the modification review.

1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, NNECo mod number, NNECO mod title and l

indicates the responsible SLE. Each modification that is reviewed requires a separate form and Document ID number.

1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Part A.

1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will review the specific checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) reviewer, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part E, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /mspector's name to each specific checklist requirement.

C

( l.5 Modification Package Initial Configuration Control Review Using the modification descriptions and modification packages, the OE answers the questions in Part C following any additionalinstmetion included in Part C.

1.5.1 If the response to all questions is "Yes," the modification will be reviewed in detail. The OE dispositions the screening for additional review, signs and dates Part C of the form and continues with Parts D and E.

1.5.2 If the response to any question is "No," a discrepancy may exist. The OE appraises the SLE and does not do any additional review of the modification until adsised by the SLE.

1.5.3 The SLE or OE will request additional documentation from NNECo using an RAL Based upon the response, the SLE may direct the OE to proceed and document the basis under comments / observation. Ifit is concluded that a discrepancy exists, it is processed in accordance with Project Procedure PP-07, 1.6 Modification Program / Topical Area Review (Part D)

The intent of this step is to review a modification with respect to program / topical areas to a level that demonstrates that NNECo meets the configuration

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 89 Revision 2 I PI-01. DOC September 23,1997 l

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CllECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK gw

( ) management control aspects of the modification. A review of the program / topical area for conformance to the selected system current licensing basis will be reviewed during the System Design Input, Licensing Bases and Programfropical review.

1.6.1 The OE reviews the modification package and completes Part D.1 of the l program / topical area modification checklists following any additional instruction in Part D. This purpose of this step is to document whether NNECo has l considered the program / topical area.

1.6.2 The OE screens the modification for applicability to each of the program / topical areas in accordance with Part D.2 and determines the applicability using the decision matrix in the instructions.

1.6.3 The OE and review specialist disposition the program / topical area in Part D.2, Item 1, s:gns and date the form. This signature indicates that the inspection of this step is complete.

1.6.4 The OE/ review specialist summarizes any programs that were not properly considered and indicates the program and discrepancy number in Part D.2, Item

2. Any additional comments / observations, if required, are documented in Part rw ) D.2, Item 3.

(

G 1.7 Checklist Requirement (Part E) 1.7.1 Using the NNECo Modification Package and other inputs documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Part E of the Modification Checklist following any additional instruction included in Part E.

1.7.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is l responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided.

1.7.3 The Modification checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient l

detail. The OE/mspector determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used only if required.

1.7.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B, prosides a disposition in accordance with the instmetions in Part E, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete.

Note: Modifications that have interface with procedures or testing require Part E, Item E to be completed. Any interface indicated in Part E, item E, will be o reviewed in accordance with the requirements of the Procedures and Testing d checklists (Forms 8 or 9). l

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

PI- 90 Revision 2 PI-01. DOC September 23,1997

l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI 41 s

SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK g

1.8 The OE of the form assures all the resiewer/ inspector inputs are included for l each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector signature, and (3) date. The OE counts the number of pages and adds the appropriate total in the header box of the form.

1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Parts C, D, and E that are dispositioned as a

" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a summary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form.

1.10 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in l accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval.

1.i Each Modification listed on the Modification Summary Listing (Form 6) will be placed on a separate form for review.

Note: For canceled modifications only applicable questions need to be answered.

2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate the specific checklist questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questions and requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Oversiew Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures.

2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected system.

2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review tearn will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook.

(VD

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 91 Revision 2 P141. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTCNE UNIT 2 SYSR P'OJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK (D) SYSTEM MODIFICATION CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS

i. Modifications which are selected for further review by the screening process are reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 7. The modifications selected for review are listed on Form 6.

Form 6 also contains a list of all in process and canceled modifications for the l

system.

2. The System Lead Engineer shall us'e the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding the.n as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.

V) Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the l selected system.

4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist question contained in the licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A.

A. GENERAL e

Was the modification performed in accordance with an Approved Design l Control Program?

e Does the modification meet the design input requirements?

If the modification has the potential to change either bases, was the as-modified design / licensing basis correctly revised as part of the modification process?

If the modification includes a Safety Evaluation is it complete and adequate?

Has the modification, if adding non safety equipment or modifications to em stmetures, considered and evaluated seismic class 2-over-1 concerns?

- Panons Power Group lac. - I PI-92 Revision 2 P!-01. DOC September 23,1997

1 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3 PROJECT INSTRUCTION Pq -01 SYS.. IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e

Are the cumulative effects of the modification on support systems, such as l !

Cooling Water, HVAC, Electrical Power Supply etc. adequately addressed and reviewed as part of the modification process?

e Is there an Interface Reviews by other groups such as Operations, Training, Simulator Training, Testing, Maintenance, etc.?

e Verify that non-safety portions of systems are isolated by automatic valves l meeting single failure criteria, or that calculations are available demonstrating that a failure in the non-safety branch will not affect the system to perform its safety function.

Verify that safety grade IE electrical power and control signals are provided to critical components and that non-safety portions have proper isolation devices, e Does the modification identify a list of Configuration control documents and databases that could require revision as a result of the modification. The following is a list of typical documents to be considered:

  • P&ID Drawings e Operating Procedures
  • FSAR text, figures and tables e Surveillance Test Procedures
  • Elementary Diagrams e ASME Design Specifications
  • One Line Diagrams e Training and/or Simulator

. Instrument Set Points e Fire Protection Evaluation Report (FPER)

  • Calculations e System Descriptions e Maintenance Procedures e

Classification /EQ lists

. For new or revised calculations that were performed for the modification did they use recognized analytical methods and are in accordance with design input?

e For new or revised calculations that were performed for the modification are all assumptions technically sound and consider all operating modes?

e Does Post-Modification testing demonstrate that the modified system meets A the performance requirements? l

() I

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI 93 Revision 2 P14)l. DOC September 23,1997

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSR PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 m SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Does Post-Modification testing validate the Pre-Operational acceptance testing?

'f e Does the modification have the potential to change the design margins for a system?

4 e

Did the modification contain any " temporary" changes? Were these changes analyzed and controlled?

e If a proposed modification was canceled did it result in procedural changes that could impose an excessive burden on the plant operators during normal or emergency operating conditions?

t

, e Was a canceled modification partially implemented and not documented properly?

! . Were field changes, if performed during the implementation of the modification, incorporated into the "as built" documentation?

Has the impact of the modification on the original design analysis, applicable to the unmodified portions of the system been adequately addressed?

e Have the program requirements been followed for " temporary" modifications?

\ . Was the modification re lected on the appropriate P&ID's,1-line/ load list and logic / loop diagrams, if a pplicable?

e For the applicable progn ms/topicals has the modification addressed the requirements?

e For the applicable program vtopicals were required document changes -

identified?

e If the modification added or revised a component that effects a setpoint, alarm, calibration or operation (log _c and/or sequence) have the appropriate procedures interfaces been identified?

e If the modification added or revised a component that effects operation, 4

function, surveillance, performance, or timing characteristics have appropriate testing procedures interfaces been identified?

If the modification added or revised a component that effects operation, logic, control board, or maintenance has the training interface been considered in the modification?

4 V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

PI- 94 Revision 2 P!-01. DOC September 23,1997

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pege 1 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW M D Numbu CHECKLIST MOD '

Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team Lead)

PAR'I A MODIFICATION CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 SignaarsDate SygnatwtDate SignatwsDate I. ORIGINATOR

2. REVIEWED - - -

Mechanical Lead Electrical Lead Control Systems Lead Piping / Structural Lead Operations Engineer Procedures Engineer Testing Engineer

3. APPROVAL - - -

System Lead Engineer

/D SVSR Lead Engineer O PART B MODIFICATION

SUMMARY

Instructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached checklist and supplemental material and indicate whether the modification adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirements.

(2) The SLE will review Part D and any supplemental material and indicates whether the system adequately l considered the ludicated program / topical requirements. The detailed review of the program / topical areas will be reviewed as a part of the SYSTEM Review.

l (3) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to !ndicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP-07.

REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2

1. Has the modification satisfied the licensing O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No basis and configuration control?
2. Are the applicable program / topical areas O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No adequately considered in the modification?
3. Summary of Discrepancy (les) Items (Part C, D, E)

Signature SLE/Date

- Parsons Power Group lac. --

FORM: 7 1 1 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 F7 CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- P:ge 2 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW M D Numhr CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead)

PART C SYSTEM LICENSING, DESIGN, CONFIGURATION SCREEN

Purpose:

This purpose of this screen is to determine if basic configuration management /desigt considerations were not addressed when the modification was prepared and to process any potential discrepancy in accordance with Project Procedure PP-07.

Instructions: 1. Review the modification and provide response to the following questions. The modification package is reviewed to the level necessary to determine the applicability of the screening question.

2. Complete review of all Part C questions.

L 3. If the answers 10 311 questions are "Yes", Modification will be reviewed in accordance with the system audit checklists.

4. If the answer to any question (s)is "No", the Modification may constitute a discrepancy. ANY "NO" MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH THE SLE. THE SLE WILL PROVIDE THE ORIGINATOR WITH DIRECTION WHETHER TO PROCEED WITH THE MODIFICATION REVIEW.
5. Project Procedure PP-07 will be used to disposition any potential discrepancy. Initiation of PP-07 will be by the originating engineer.
6. Complete Part C.1, sign and date.

Question Applicability SCREENING QUESTIONS:

1. O Yes O No Has a 10 CFR50.59 screenmg/cvaluation been addressed?
2. O Yes O No Were unreviewed safety question adequately resolved? (If the unreviend safety questions were sent to the NRC and NRC concurrence received prior to completing the modification , this question was properly addressed and it should be dispositioned as "Yes")
3. O Yes O No Have documents requirmg change been identified?
4. O Yes O No Have FSAR revisions been addressed?
5. O Yes O No if there are applicable system interfaces, have they been identitied?

-f PART C.1 MODIFICATION INITIAL CONFIGURATION SCREEN '

j A. STATUS:

O DISCREPANCY O INITIAL MODIFICATION CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE CONTINUE WITH DETAILED REVIEW Originating Engineer /Date:

B. COMMENTS / OBSERVATIONS (If Applicable):

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 I 2 Package Sequence No. 8 Re51sion 2 F7-CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pcg2 3 0f xx q MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW M D Number CHECKLIST mod e Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

PART D SYSTEM MODIFICATION PROGRAM /FOPICAL CHECKLIST General Instructions: (1) The intent of thl Part of the checklist is to verify that the program / topical areas were considered and in accordance with the NNEco Configuration Management procedures (2) From a Configuration Management viewpoint, each modification should be reviewed against each of the NNEco program / topical areas for applicability. In reality, only certala areas may apply to the modification. The purpose of Part D of this form is to document whkh area have been considered by l NNECo for the modification.

(3) For eeth program / topical area listed below, the system ORIGINATING ENGINEER (OE) determines if the applicable area was considered by NNEco for the modification and indicate in the appropriate box in Part D.I. Where applicable, the OE may request input from program specialists.

(4) The OE signs and deus to indicate that Part D is completed.

Remember that for early modifications, certain programs were not in effect and may not have been considered during the course of the modification. For these cases, the program / topical ares reviews of the Design input and IJcensing Basis ChecLilst will be utilized ta verify the System has adequately addressed the area.

PART D.1 PROGRAMfrOPICAL AREA MODIFICATION CHECKLIST Instructions: (1) The OE resiews the modification package and indicates whether the program / topical area was considered d by NNECo verifying only to the extent that the area was in accordance with the NNECo Configuration Management Control. If the program / topical area was in effect at the time of the modification, the area must be considered even ifit is not applicable. For this process " CONSIDERED" is defined as being addressed in some NNECo procedure or desigt, basis document (i.e. Design input document, Design Change Record checklist, etc.).

(2) Since the program / topical area may not hase existed when the modification was performed, "Not Applicable (NA)", is an appropriate NNECo action for a particular area. "NA" should ONLY be used if the modification was performed before the program area was initiated. (See below) l Note: The purpose is to validate the program / topical area was considered using the NNECo procedures in effect when the modification was performed. The Reviewer does not need to verify that the modification was prepared in accordance with those prucedures in effect when the modification was prepared. The Reviewer only needs to assure that the modification considered and recognized the necesslty of the program.

NNECo Did NNEco Consider the Applicability item Applicability of PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA Date Program / Topical Area?

I O Yes O No O NA Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM ( ATWS) 2 O Yes O No O NA Control Room Design Resiew 3 0 Yes O No O NA Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment (EQ) 4 0 Yes O No O NA Erosion / Corrosion 5 0 Yes O No O NA External Events / Hazards 6 0 Yes O No O NA Generic Letter 8910 (MOV)

O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 1 3 Package Sequence No. 8 T"/-CLMDE. DOC Resision 2 9/23/97

_ _ _ ~ _ . ._. _. .

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD. P:ge 4 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

, ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNumbn CHECKLIST MD '

Responsible Engmeer (System Team Ind) 7 0 Yes O No O NA Heavy Loads 8 0 Yes O No O NA High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (131 WMELB) 9 0 Yes O No O NA Insenice Inspectiou

, 10 0 Yes O No O NA Insenice Testing /10 CFR50 Appendix J Testing 11 O Yes O No O NA IPEEE 12 O Yes O No O NA Master Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) 13 0 Yes O No O NA Regulatory Guide 1.97 Compliance 14 0 Yes O No O NA Separation / Independence / Diversity

) 15 0 Yes O No O NA Set Point Control 16 0 Yes O No O NA Single Failure 17 0 Yes O No O NA Station Blackout 18 0 Yes O No O NA 10 CFR50 Appendix R 19 0 Yes O No O NA USI A-46(SeismicQualification)

PART D.2 SYSTEM PROGRAMROPICAL SCREENING CHECKLIST Instructions
(1) The OE evaluates each of the following screening questions in columns B.

(2) Using the results from Part D.1 indicate next to the applicable screening question whether NNEco l considered the Program / Topical area.

(3) Discuss differences with the SLE and interface with the Design input and IJcensing Basis reviewer (s) to determine whether the program / topical area satisfies the current licensing basis.

(4) The applicable of the program /topicalis addressed in item 1 of Part D.2.

l (5) The OE uses the following matrix to determine the applicability of the program / topical area with avspect to the applicable modification. Column A represents the venical axis and column D represents the l horizontal axis. The OE dispositions column E *Programfl'opical Area is:

Part D.2 Columns Column D = "Yes" Column D = "No" Coi - sn D = "NA" l Column A = "YE*" Applicable Discrepancy Not Applicable (1)

Column A = "No" Applicable (2) Not Applicable Not Applicable (1)

(1) Not Applicable because modification occurred after program / topical was initiated.

(2) NNECo defined as applicable (6) The OE advises the SLE of the DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP-07 will be by the O E.

O V - Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 7 I 4 Pact age Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 F7-CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97 i

i DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pcge 5 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

NJ ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW N Number CHECKLIST N '

Responsible Eng.ncer:

(System Team lead)

PREMISE RESULTS REF. @"Pomu Fmn PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA PART E Program / Topical D E

^'"

consider Program /

Topical Aren?

A B C D E O Yes Does the modification add, delete or modify the licensing basis Dl.1 O Yes O Applicable O No for the Anticipated Transients Without SCRAM (ATWS)? O No O Not Applicabic 0 NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification involve changes to the main control DI.2 O Yes O Applicable O No board, , local panels, labeling, or the operating procedures O No O Not Applicable O NA requiring a Human Factors Review? O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification add or change components requiring DI.3 0 Yes O Applicable O No evaluation under the licensing basis for environmental O No O Not Applicable O NA qualification? O NA O Discrepancy A)

( O Yes O No Does the modification afTect portion of a system covered by the erosion / corrosion program for the plant?

DIA O Yes O No O Applicable O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification impact doors, hatches, building structure DI5 0 Yes O Applicable O No or other features require to protect the system form external O No O Not Applicable O NA missiles, tornadoes, flooding or other external events included O NA O Discrepancy in the licensing basis?

O Yes Does the modification add or modify any motor operated valves DI.6 0 Yes O Applicable O No requiring review under the plants MOV program? (89-10) O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification change or add cranes / loads requirmg DI.7 0 Yes O Applicable O No evaluation under the heavy loads program? O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification involve high or moderate energy piping Dl.8 0 Yes O Applicable O No that requires evaluation for the impact on asfe shutdown in O No O Not Applicable O NA accordance with the licensing basis? O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Do:s the modification change or add components that are DI.9 0 Yes O Applicable O No covered by the plants inservice inspection program? O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification change or add components that are DI.10 0 Yes O Applicable O No covered by the plants inservice testing program? (ASME O No O Not Applicable O NA Section XI or Appendix J) O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification impact doors, hatches, building Dl.11 O Yes O Applicable O No structures or other features which may etTect the plans O No O Not Applicable a

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 I 5 Package Sequence No. 8 Retision 2 F7-CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pcge 6 of n

( MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW M D Numba CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer.

(System Team Lead)

O NA Individual Plant Exammation for External Events? (IPEEE) O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Will the modification require revisions to the Master DI.12 O Yes O Applicable O No Equipment and Parts List?(MEPL) O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification impact instruments required for DI.13 0 Yes O Applicable O No licensing basis compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.977 0 No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification involve changes which could impact the DI.14 0 Yes O Applicable O No licensing basis for separation, independence, or diversity? O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification impact an in..trument or device setpoint? Dl.15 0 Yes O Applicable O No O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification introduce any single failure DI.16 0 Yes O Applicable O No vulnerabilities into the plant or change features provided for O No O Not Applicable O NA single failure protection? O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification impact any components or systems used Dl.17 0 Yes O Applicable

/ \ O No for Station Blackout coping? O No O Not Applicable

'd O NA O NA O Discrepancy 0 Yes Does the modification involve components required for DI.18 0 Yes O Applicable O No Appendix R safe shutdown, fire suppressions systems, fire O No O Not Applicable O NA detection systems, fire barriers, etc.? O NA O Dixtepancy G Yes Does the modification impact the seismic analysis of the DI.19 0 Yes O Applicable O No system or the qualification of the components in the system? O No O Not Applicable O NA O NA O Discrepancy

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 I 6 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 17-CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MO D- P:g 7 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM: __

MODIFICATION REVIEW M D Nmnbn CHECKLIST M D H ic Responsible Engmeer (System Team lead)

1. PROGRAM / TOPICAL

SUMMARY

The above programs / topical areas have been reviewed and applicability noted. The program / topical areas with respect to this modification are considered as:

O ADEQUATELY ADDRESS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ASPECT O DOES NOT SATISFY CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ASPECT (List program (s) and discrepancy number (s) below and verify that a discrepancy is processed in accordance with PP-07)

Program / Topical Specialist /Date:

Originating Engineering /Date:

l 2.

PROC RAM / TOPICAL AREA (S) NOT CONFORMING TO CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ltem Programfropical Discrepancy Number b

v

3. COMMENTS / OBSERVATIONS (If applicable):

O V

- Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 I 7 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 F7-ClatDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pcge 8 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

MODIFICATION REVIEW " N""b" CHECKLIST " '

Responsible Engineer.

(System Team Lead)

PART E SYSTEM MODIFICATION REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST lastructions: For each requirement listed below:

(1) GLE, SLE, OE and system team develops the specific requirements to be miewed using the generic questions in the lastruction and Attachment A Source Book. Egjg requirement will be given a new item number and include steps A, B, C, D, and E.

(2) Each requirement will be consecutively numbered starting with I (one).

(3) The systein lead Engineer will assign the function group responsible for miewing each requirement.

Mechanical = M Electrical = E. Controls = IAC, Testing = T. Procedures = P. Operations = 0 (4) The indhidual that miews the requirement will sien and dce., provide a disposition, ladicated laterfaces, and provide a response based upon the following:

a. Yes Requirement is satisfactorily addmsed. Include reference source, mision, and date. No esplanation/results is required,
b. No Requirement is not satisfactorily addressed. Include reference source, revision and date, if applicable. If an RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the reference RAI number and subsequent NNEco response reference is to be provided. Prwide an explanation of how you concluded the requirement was not satisfned. include reference source, revision, and date.,if applicable. Disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible ladividual shall immediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY, Initiation of Project g Procedure PP-07 will be by the OE.
c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Esplanation should be included only ifit clarifles the disposition.
d. INF Requirement could not be verified because information could not be found. Include a statement under results that indicates the information could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY The responsible individual shall immediately advise the SLE of any requirement that is to be dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of Project Procedure PP.

07 will be by the OE.

Part Review Requirement E Group Status Reviewer Signature Item

1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT

[Use thisformatfor attributes that do not involveprocedures or testing]. l

. B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING THE CONFIGURATION CONTROL ASPECTS l D DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07) l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l

- Parsons Power Group lac. -

FORM: 7 1 8 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 F7-CLMDE. DOC 9/23/97

DOCUMENT ID: RC. MOD. Page 9 of xx n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:

l V ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM:

M DNurnber MODIFICATION REVIEW CIIECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer:

(System Team Lead)

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT l Parte Review Requirement Item Grnup Status Reviewer Signature

1. O Yes O No O ::A O INF Date A. REOUIREMENT JUse thisformatfor attributes that involve procedures or testing).

B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:

O SATISFYING THE CONFIGURATION CONTROL ASPECTS O DISCREPANCY (Process per PP-07)

C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCFJ REVISION / DATE:

O V

D. REVIEW

SUMMARY

/ RESULT E. MODIFICATION INTERFACES:

Should the modification interface with Maintenance, Testing or Procedures, the Responsible Engineer will indicate the type interface (s) below and immediately advise the procedure and/or test lead engineer of this interface.

O Malatenance and Test O Procedures O Does not interface with Maintenance and Test or Procedures O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -

FORM: 7 I-07 9 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 2 F74LMDE. DOC 9/23/97

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211E308&oldid=3302846"