ML20206L411
| ML20206L411 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1986 |
| From: | Verrelli D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608200174 | |
| Download: ML20206L411 (2) | |
Text
-_
f l AUG.08 1986 Carolina Power and Light Company vATTN: Mr. E. E. Utley Senior Executive Vice President Power Supply and Engineering and Construction P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
FEMA FINAL REPORT - H. B. ROBINSON EMERGENCY EXERCISE OF OCTOBER 22, 1985 Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Final Report for the H. B. Robinson Emergency Exercise of October 22, 1985. As. described in the enclosure FEMA did not identify any deficiencies; however, ten areas have been identified that require corrective actions. Several of the items noted were:
(1) a failure to provide adequate dosimetry for emergency workers in Darlington, Lee, and Chesterfield Counties, (2) the lack of accountability for the mobility-impaired and those having special needs in all three counties, (3) the lack of coordination of the EBS messages and the amergency siren sounding in Chesterfield County, (4) the absence of any rumor control system in the Media Canter, and (5) the failure of the State and the utility to coordinate information prior to media briefings.
We encourage you to assist the appropriate organizations in resolving the weaknesses identified by FEMA. Resolution of these items should be completed prior to the next full scale emergency preparedness exercise.
We also encourage you to work closely with the State and counties in the development of a scenario for the next full scale exercise that will effectively test the areas in which the above items were disclosed.
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely, David M. Verrelli, Chief-Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Encisoure:
FEMA Final Report cc w/ encl: (See page 2) 8600200174 860808 '
PDR ADOCK 05000261 I F PDR l \
- - - - - - - _ _ - - _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - J
e Carolina Power and Light Company 2 P
cc w/ encl:
- 4. P. Beatty, Jr. , Manager Robinson Nuclear Project Department R: E. Morgan, Plant General Manager bec w/ enc 1:
JRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of North Carolina f
, f R RII RII I J ATabaka TDe ker DColli (.M 16fiTc' redric $ n 8/G/86 8/g/86 8/g /86 E!/ /86 8' /86
')
.- d
, Federal Emergency Management Agency f
A / Washington, D.C. 20472 o
W s
MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness _
and Engineering Response s Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission FHOM:
Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Prograns SUBJECr: Exercise Report for the October 22, 1985, Exercise of the Offsite Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Power Plant Attached is one copy of the Exercise Report for the October 22, 1985, partial participation joint exercise of the offsite radiological emergency '
preparedness plans for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Power Plant. W e plant is located approximately 5 miles northwest of Hartsville, South Carolina.
he exercise report, dated November 5, 1985, was prepared by Region IV of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and includes the coments resulting from the Regional Assistance Comittee review.
he State of South Carolina, and Chesterfield, Darlington, and Ice Counties, which are located in the plume emergency planning zone (EPZ), participated in the exercise. .In accord with the exercise plan, the State of South ,
Carolina participation was minimal, while the participation by the counties was extensive.
here were no deficiencies observed at the exercise. here were ;
inadequacies identified which require corrective actions. Were were also several areas recomended for inprovement. Rese are discussed in Section II entitled, " Detailed Discussion." Additional equipment, training, and coordination meetings anong the various response agencies were recomended to acconplish these inprovements and thereby enhance the emergency response capability of the involved governments and agencies. Attached is the response by the State of South Carolina to the exercise report and their schedule of corrective actions dated February 12, 1986. H e Region will assure conpletion by the State of the necessary corrective actions.
%e inadequacies observed did not detract fran the overall capability demonstrated by the State of South Carolina, and Chesterfield, Darlington, and Lee Counties to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. Based on the results of the October 22, 1985, exercise, FEMA considers that offuite radiological emergency preparedness is adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate ',-
measures can be taken offsite to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the site in the event of a radiological emergency. Werefore, the original 44 CPR 350 approual dated December 28, 1981, for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Power Plant will remain in effect.
,hvM2 % 4,ypp .
i ,
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. W rt S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 646-2860.
i Attachments As Stated b
9 1
4 e "4 0
L. ,r
- g Ghc State of South Garolina fHiliturg Department f l
t
<J OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL T ESTON MARCHANT UA *OR GENERAL
%HE ADJUTANT GENERAL February 12, 1986 Mr. Glenn C. Woodard, Chief Natural and Technological Hazards Division FEMA, Region IV 1371 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 ,
Dear Mr. oodard:
This is in response to your letter of DecemberRobinson 13, 1985 which conveyed the draft report of the H. B.
Nuclear Station partial participation exercise conducted on October 22, 1985.
i Schedule of corrective actions regarding inadequacies found during the exercise are attached. .
Sincerely, J s ua P. Moore irector JPM:AT: tid ,
l Attachments
.y Emergency Preparedness Division Rutledge Building 1429 Senate Street Columble, South Carolina 29201 (803) 754-2026
-~ ~ - - - ~ ~'
r . .
. CORRECTIVE ACTION NUREG ITEM FACILITX Training and Media Center E.6., Notification Methods Drill and Procedures Training and G.4.b., Public Education Drill and Information Training and
- G.4.c., Public Education and Information . Drill Please refer to our letter of August 2, 1985 which defined the purpose / scope and exercise objectives for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Station Partial Participation Exercise.
Although EPD concurred with a formal evaluation of the Media Center and associated Public Information activities this subject was not internally coordinated with and approved by the Governor's Emergency Management Of fice (GEMO) , the proponent / cognizant Accordingly, the limited State activity for the Media Center. I j
number of State Public Information personnel present at the '
Media Center were there only to assist the counties, not to l
run an evaluated Media Center operation. t i
Appropriate action has been taken to preclude future occurrences of this nature.-
P
- e
.d
\
I I
Attachment 1 J
CORRECTIVE '
NUREG ITEM ACTION
- FACILITY .
r E.6., Notification Methods Training and Chesterfield Improvements of County and Procedures EBS Procedures ;
K.3.a, Radiological
- Equipment Exposure Control Acquisition J.10.d., Protective Response Compile List of Mobility-Impaired E.6. The Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) functioning has long been an issue of concern.
A fault of the current EBS plan is that the Lancaster radio station (the current common program ,
control station (CPCS) signal does not reach local stations. .
The issue has been addressed to the Co-Chairmen of the South -
Carolina' Emergency Broadcasting System. As soon as the SCEBS l
responds, the EBS procedures will be modified to remedy the situation. - .
i 4
K.3.a. Submission to purchase low level dosimeters and TLD's 7
l will be made in the next local budget request. The 1outh l Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division has sought funding
{
through the State-Budget Process to purchase low level' dosimeters with unfavorable results in,the FY 85-86 budget. It will be i re-submitted during the next; budget cycle. Concurrent with these actions, coordination will be made with the utility to secure these items for use in ;an emergency.
Date of completion: As soon as practicable after approval of funding or, if procured from the utility, 30 June 1986.
j ~
4 '
1 J.10.d. Actions being taken in response to this item are:
i
--Develop a telephone listing / contact list of home health servicep, utilities, local rescue squads and county health departments to contact individuals they know of to assist in l making evacuation arragements.
--Write a special SOP to address this problem.
l --Work with local hospital and nursing homes to receive if ,e l
necessary, individuals needing special services.
Date of Completion: On-Going l
Attachment 2 i
2- ,
- CORRECTIVE
' - ~
.' NUREG ITEM ACTION FACILITY J.10.d., Protective Compile List of Darlington Mobility-Impaired County .
Response
K.3.a., Radiological Equipment Exposure Control Acquisition i
J.10.d.
We do have in our plans a workable plan with all of the Hospitals, Nursing Homes and the Mental Retardation Center for the evacuation of these Mobility-Impaired Individuals within the County. The brochure which Carolina Power and Light Company has sent to all residents within the 10 mile EPZ tells those who have a special need to call or advise us.
As of this date, we have had no response from anyone who We also will utilize the Rescue Squads received the brochure.
and Fire Departments to assist in this endeavor should the need arise,.
Date of Completion: On-Going K.3.a. The Sout,h Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division has sought funding through the State Budget Process to purchase low level dosimeters with unfavorable results in the FY 85-86 budget.
It will be'recubmitted during the next budget cycle. Concurrent with these actions, coordination will be made with the utility to secure these items for use in an emergency.
Date of compl'etion: As soon as practicable after approval of
' funding or, if procured from the utility, 30 June 1986.
i ..
I . .
ar Attachment 3
.- CORRECTIVE NUREG ITEM ACTION FACILITX K.3.a., Radiological Equipment Lee Acquisition Exposure Control J.10.d., Protective Compile List of Response ,,
Mobility-Impaired i
-4 ~
K.3.a. Submission to purchase low level dosimeter 4 and TLD's will be made in the next local budget request. The. South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division has sought funding through the State Budget Process to purchase low level dosimeters with unfavorable results in the FY 85-86 budegt. It will be re-submitted during the next budget cycle. Concurrent with these actions, coordination will be made with the utility l to secure these items for use in an emergency.
Date of Completion: As soon as practicable after approval of ~
funding or, if procured from the utility, 30 June 1986.
J.10.d.- The county has started a program processing the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the mobility impaired in the-ten mile area. The ability to evacuate them, if they do not have plans or arrangements made, is being developed concurrently. ,
Date of Completion: On-Going
.)
Attachment 4
l i
i H.B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EXERCISE Conducted on October 22, 1985 Exercise Report November 5, 1985 Utility: Carolina Power and Light Company ,
i Plant Locat' ion: Near Hartsville, South Carolina l
Participating State and Local Governments:
State of South Carolina (Partial) i ,
Chesterfield County
' Darlington County Lee County ,
l
) *)
' O' a m ,j e $&V (g7pp fp I f' 1
1
.( :
I i
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS i
Page Exercise Summary 1 I.
II. Detailed Discussion 4 Media Center 4 Chesterfield County 5 Darlington County 9 Lee County 11
! Traffic and Access Control .14 l Fire Activity 14 Medical Drill 15 III. Summary Listing of Deficiencies 16 1
IV. Appendices i
- A. Evaluator List and Assignments !
[
I B. Exercis,e Objectives, Scenario 1
i I
e l
- V
' i e
i I. EXERCISE
SUMMARY
i, This partial participation exercise was conducted on ' October 22, 1985, and was observed and evaluated by eleven Federal evaluators The evaluation was based on representing FEMA, N RC , and DOT." Criteria for Preparation and NUREG-0654-FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Prepared-ness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants".
There were no NUREG deficiencies observed during the exercise.
However, there were ten areas requiring corrective actions observed.
There are also several suggestions for improvements listed in Section II, " Detailed Discussion", for the facilities and activities evaluated. Additional training and equipment are recommended to correct the observed inadequacies and to accomplish the improve-ments suggested.
Since this was a " partial participation" exercise, State involve-
- ment was limited and the three counties' involvement was extensive.
Of the State level activities, only the Public Information function at the Media Center was formally evaluated.
The following is a brief summary of the Federal evaluator's reports.
j Media Center During the exercise, several problems were observed in the activa-tion of the Emergency Broadcast System. Procedures were not clearly established and checklists were not available. The Media Center is located at the plant site which is within the probable hazard area.
Communica-More detailed plans are needed for alternate facilities.
i tions are dependent upon the commercial telephone. Some problems l were experienced which reinforced the need for back-up communica- '
tions with other operations facilities. e Chesterfield County EOC The Chesterfield County EOC was promptly staffed and activated. The facility, while small and unconnected, is adequate. Communications are also adequate.
Management of the EOC was adequate, but operations personnel were Later ,e initially complacent and simulated several important actions.
l in the exercise, this improved consfderably.
s- .
l i
I. EXERCISE
SUMMARY
t -
This partial participation exercise was conducted on O'ctober 22, 1985, and was observed and evaluated by eleven Federal evaluators
" Criteria for Preparation and NUREG-0654-FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Evaluation of Radiological Emergency-Response Plans and Prepared-ness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants".
There were no NUREG deficiencies observed during the exercise.
However, there were ten areas requiring corrective actions observed.
There are also several suggestions for improvements listed in Section II, " Detailed Discussion", for the facilities and activities evaluated. Additional training and equipment are recommended to correct.the observed inadequacies and to accomplish the improve-ments suggested.
Since this was a " partial participation" exercise, State involve-ment was limited and the three counties' involvement was extensive.
Of the State level activities, only the Public Information function I at the Media Center was formally evaluated.
The following is a brief summary of the Federal evaluator's reports.
.i
- ? -
j Media Center During the exercise, several problems were observed in the activa-tion of the Emergency Broadcast System. Procedures were not clearly established and checklists were not available. The Media Center is located at the plant site which is within the probable hazard area.
Communica-More detailed plans are needed for alternate facilities.
i tions are dependent upon the commercial telephone. Some problems were experienced which reinforced the need for back-up communica-tions with other operations facilities. a Chesterfield County i
EOC The Chesterfield County EOC was promptly staffed and activated. The facility, while small and unconnected, is adequate. Communications are also adequate.
Management of the EOC was adequate, but operations personnel were Later ,e initially complacent and simulated several important actions.
in the exercise, this improved consfderably.
~
f -
The Emergency Broadcast System within Chesterfield County is de-ficient. The County back-up procedures are insufficient to make i up for the EBS failures.
The County has no list of mobility-inpaired individuals. Other protective actions were adequately demonstrated. _
Outside Activities Field activities in Chesterfield County were generally good, although the decontamination center should be set up with monitoring acti-Also, paper vities located closer to the decontamination facilities.
should be used to cover the floors. Route alerting was inadequate;-
no prescribed messages were available, and actual routing procedures had not been developed. Dosimetry equipment was also inadequate.
There were no low-range dosimeters or TLD badges available.
Lee County EOC The Lee County EOC was activated and staffed promptly according to planned procedures. Command and control was effectively demonstrated.
Overall, the f acilities were very good and the communications systems operated well. Public alerting was accomplished promptly, although there was no confirmation of public instructions released.
The County needs to develop a list of the handicapped and mobility-impaired residents.in'the county and establish procedures for pro-tecting these individuals. Although self-reading dosimeters were present, the County needs permanent-record devices for emergency workers. Press briefings were prepared and given at the County EOC.
Outside Activities The Relocation Center at the Mt. Pleasant High School has adequate
' l staffing and generally adequate f acilities but needs better communi-cations and a firm commitment for the provision of cots.
The Decontamination Center at Mt. Pleasant High, School is adequate physically; however, the staff should be more highly trained, and i
more decontamination supplies and equipment are needed.
I Lee County had adequate vehicles and equipment for evacuation and traffic control; however, emergency workers should receive more training in radiation protection.
The hospital Medical support activities in Lee County were excellent.
staff was well trained and conscientious.
=
a
Darlington County l EOC The Darlington County EOC generally is a good facility staffed by competent personnel who knew their jobs and were committed to the jobs. Support by members of the County Council das particular-ly strong. At the same time, several inadequacies were. observed, including failure to seal off the evacuated area, an insufficient l system to locate the mobility-impaired, inadequate knowledge of the planned procedures for evacuating schools, insufficient telephones and dosimetry, and inadequate staf f briefings.
Outside. Activities ,
Monitoring, registration and shelter assignment generally went well at the Darlington Raceway. Three suggestions for improvement are recommended in the " Detailed Discussion" section of this report.
Traffic and Access Control The exercise objectives pertaining to traffic and access control were demonstrated and met in Chesterfield, Lee and Darlington counties during this exercise.
Fire Activity A fire drill was conducted at the plant involving the on-site brigade and an off-site fire department (Hartsville). The response of the off-site department was prompt with the exception of a 12-minute delay in ghining entrance through the plant gate. The off-site department demonstrated the ability to provide valuable
} assistance in the event of an emergency.
!!edical Drill ;
The staff at the Byerly Hospital is well trained, properly equipped, and adequately demonstrated the appropriate health physics techni-ques for treating contaminated / injured personnel.
t 4
- v e
- ~ -_ - - - -
I
- t. :
i i
i
- i l I !
II. DETAILED DISCUSSION Media Center ..
i 1 . ;
i - The staff demonstrated a basic knowledge of public information j
activities as well as enthusiasm. Individual message logs were i j
maintained, and contact was continuous with County EOC's and the j - FEOC (State Operations). The media center facilities are minimal-l ly acceptable. The location of ihe media center is onsite at the l H. B. Robinson Plant in the Visitcyg Center. The media center 7
j would have to relocate should a seidoua emergency occur at the plant to keep individuals out of the' hazard area. Although this ;
l exercise was not designed to test the alternate media center, this l relocation action was not discussed or simulated. The State and County PIO's were neither aware of the alternate location nor the
)' facility's resources. Most importantly, there are no procedures i for this relocation operation, and how and when they would be ,
accomplished. Since the media center has a role in the activation j
of the EBS system, more formal arrangements are necessary.
I The media center is too small to support the operation. Most 1
necessary resources and equipment were available to support the j
activities (i.e., copy machine, phones, press kits, charts, security, l
etc). Communications are dependent on the commercial telephone system. Back-up arrangements were not available.
The Darlington :
County PIO did bring a radio (walkie/ talkie) which provided a com-munications link to the Darlington EOC. This was the only additional communications capability. Back-up communications need to be established with all operations centers as well as hard-copy capa- .
bility. In the early stages of the exercise, coordination was
- lacking between the State and the. utility. After'several dis-cussions between the evaluator and the participants, substantial ,
j progress was made in this area. :
The utility and State staff began conferring on information in '
advance of its release. However, there are no pyocedures which
}
1 r are agreed upon by both agencies. It is recommended that pro-i cedures be developed which establish how both agencies will work
! I together to ensure coordinated information (G.4.b.). During'most
- of the exercise, both the State and the utility operated independent-ly. Coordination in advance of media briefings was informal and l
limited. It is recommended that prior to media briefings all agency representatives meet to discuss media briefing information and :
strategies in detail.
Message content should be more closely reviewed. A checklist could l be used to ensure the inclusion of such things as contact phone ,y numbers and geographical boundary descriptions. Many of the messages l i written were developed rapidly and everlooked pertinent information.
i 1 4 1
l i
i
-m_--._----,...--m.-c.m-.._. ms.,.__..m,,,,,_.,_..._,.~._-,._-,.._..-,,,,..,-.~.-.-.-m.-,..-,,.m.,_,,--m..
The most serious concern identified was the ineffective acti-vation and lack of coordination of EBS in conjunction with sounding the sirens (E.6.). The prompt notification system is a most im-portant aspect of protecting the public. Written checklists and Although prescripted messages were procedures were not observed.
referred to, EBS messages and press releases were not always com-plete. Follow-up EBS messages were not developed or discussed.
No t.V. or radio was available to the PIO's to verify EBS messages.
No rumor control system was established or coordinated with the utility, although this was an objective of the exercise (G.4.c.).
It is difficult to see the effectiveness of public information l efforts in any exercise, especially where no media or public repre-sentatives are present. It is suggested that the next exercise include much more live questioning of spokespersons and a greater and more realistic number of telephone calls to PIO's from the media and " concerned citizens". This use of mock media can point out weakhesses in information being presented, and can be an ex-cellent training opportunity. The use of mock media makes the l
' briefings much more realistic.
I Many of the problem areas identified were noted in the last exer-cise report. More effort'is needed in correcting these problems, especially those involving EBS.
Areas Recommended for Improvement:
1
- 1. Alternate media center facilities need to be formally identified and procedures established for relocation.
, 2. Appropriate back-up communications capability needs to be identified and established.
3 Hard-copy capability needs to be provided to all operations facilities.
I 4. Use some form of mock media during the next exercise to add more re'alism to the public information aptivities.
' Chesterfield County EOC The notification of the ALERT declaration arrived at the Chesterfield County EOC at 0943 from the SEOC. The core staff i
was already mobilized as part of the routine working day. At the SITE AREA EMERGENCY declaration, received at 1108, the remainder of the staff was called to report to the EOC. The staffing .e was completed at 1128. Approximately 24 individuals responded to the EOC representing the County Cbuncil, the Emergency Pre-paredness Agency, the Department of Social Services, the County 4
I
- l. .
- i 4
schools, the County Public Works, the Sheriff, fire and rescue, and amateur radio (ARES).
i The staff generally displayed adequate training and knowledge for i their tasks once motivated. However, during the early stages of the exercise, there was general complacency and a. tendency to simulate most actions with a minimum of follow through. After
' discussions between the Emergency Management Director. (EMD) and the Federal evaluator about the situation, the EMD began to ag-gressively assign tasks and decision-making needs. At that point, l the staff appeared competent and readily able to carry out their tasks. But there is a continuing need to fight compacency and to aggressively challenge inconsistent, incomplete and confusing in-formation.
4 There appears to be adequate staffing, upon inspection of the county procedures, for 24-hours per day operation. A procedure is
]
1 in place to move'to eight-hour shifts, four hours after an ALERT -
j is received.
No inadequacies were noted in activation and staffing. The objec-I tives of mobilizing staff, activating facilities, around the clock staffing, decision-making and coordination were met.
1 f The EMD, as specified in the plan, was effectively in charge. He
! ' involved the staff, as appropriate, in the decision-making. Because of the small group, he had no formal briefings of the EOC. However,
' the staff are located in three separate areas and periodic briefings are necessary to insure that all staff are promptly and fully aware l
of the situation. These briefings should include a response by each agency present concerning their actions.
Message logs were kept, and messages were generally reproduced and i distributed, although the staff felt there were problems in T keeping up with heavy message flow.
copies of the county plan and procedures were present but rarely used. On occasion, this led to certain required tasks being left s
4 undone. For example, during the second siren sounding, which was l
simulated, a c'all was made to activate the sirens, but no calls l
were made to the three local radio stations to activate the EBS.
Clear-cut checklists should be considered for critical tasks and the change of emergency levels to insure that necessary actions are taken.
The first The GENERAL EMERGENCY declarationtowas evacuatereceivedsections at 1258. AO, Dl, D2,
- protective action recommendation, C1, and El, and shelter the remaining sectors, was received at 1108. I j Appropriate actions to coordinate emergency activities were taken j at each declaration. .=
l 1
i
- l I l l
L--
i-
< -7 4
j i i No deficiences were noted in emergency operations management.
1 The facility, although small, unconnected and cramped, is ade-l quate. The facility is not able to support extended operations, l
but most staff live relatively near the EOC.
i
~
4 No back-up power is available for the EOC. Because of the im-portance of power to the EOC for radiological and other emergencies, j especially weather related, back-up power should be supplied.
Necessary maps and status boards were present and generally kept up-to-date. However, the emergency classification level was only noted on the status board. We recommend large, color-coded signs to hang at the end of the hall near the EMD's office and in the j operations room as an effective way of informing all incoming and current staff of the level.
The facility met the objective of demonstrating the adequacy of
, facilities and displays to support emergency operations. No inade-quacies were observed.
Communications equipment was adequate with a diversity of primary and back-up links to all necessary facilities. Most were demon-strated throughout the day.
1 .
j Further back-up was provided by the amateur radio group, ARES, who
! provided a link to the McBee area.
[ No communications problems were noted. The objective relating to pj
'3 communications was met. .
Chesterfield County activated its sirens, in coordination with the rest of the EPZ, at 1115. The call initiating this activation came i
from the FEOC at 1108. Later when informed by the FEOC that the l
j sirens in Sector Al had not sounded, the EMD simulated the dispatch, 4 at 1144, of two ambulances from Patrick to run back-up alerting l
routes in the sector. However, no preplanned routes were provided, l
which might increase the public alerting time. We recommend that back-up alerting routes be considered for each sector and made available to agencies who will run them. ,
l 1
The designated EBS stations in Chesterfield County, WPDZ, WCPL,'and J
WCRE were not able to monitor theno common program control station, WLCM/WPAJ, in Lancaster. Thus EBS message was coordinated with i
! the sirens. At approximately 1135 the local EBS stations were notified by the County directly to put out a siren test message.
l However, no formal EBS message was available from the State, or was 8 formulated in the county.
f There was no coordination or consultation with the State on the contents of the EBS message sent out elsewhere in the EPZ. ,z 1
l 1
\ \
i 4
\
The county has prepared back-up emergency broadcast procedures, but these are not coordinated with the other EBS procedures used within the EPZ.
We recommend that the EBS situation in Chesterfield County be j improved or that the back-up procedures developed by the County be fully coordinated with the State EBS procedures to ensure accurate and coordinated messages and instructions arb provided promptly to the public.
The objective of demonstrating the ability to alert the public and disseminate an initial instructional message was not met. The ability to formulate and distribute appropriate instructions to l the public in a timely fashion was not demonstrated. (E.6.)
The staff Implementation of protective actions was demonstrated.
developed appropriate evacuation Traffic plans considering control points were the limitations considered imposed by road closings.
as well as numbers of persons to be evacuated.
However, the county Emergency Preparedness Agency was not aware of any mobility-impaired individuals, including those not able to provide their own transportation. (J.10.d.) We recommend that the county make an effort to determine the numbers and needs of their mobility-impaired individuals. This need not infringe upon confidentiality since it could be volunteered information.
l The objectives relating to demonstrating organization and resources necessary to deal with traffic impediments and access control was ! ,
met.
Outside Activities
' The field activities in Chesterfield County were generally well demonstrated. Emergency workers exhibited good training and know-ledge. The relocation center itself should be re-designed so that monitoring of evacuees takes place closer to the showers used for decontamination. Additionally, These a roll of paper to cover the floors changes would reduce the spread of should be obtained.
contamination., Emergency workers also-need training in the pur- <
pose and use of KI. .
Chesterfield County should also work on its route alerting proce-8 dures. Brief messages should be developed instructing individuals to tune to an EBS station, and routes should be planned and practiced to ensure coverage of the entire area.
There was inadequate dosimetry equipment in the county. There were (K.3.a.)
no low-range dosimeters, and no permanent record badges.
Areas Recommended for Improvement: ,
- 1. Re-design relocation set-up so ,that monitoring takes place closer to the showers used for decontamination.
~ - - - - - - - , ~ - . _ . _ - ,
I l
_9-I i -
- 2. Paper should be obtained to cover floors to prevent spread of contamination. l i l 3. Routes should be developed for route alerting. '
4, Prescribed messages should be developed for public instruc-r l 4. -
! tions. %
- 5. Develop prescribed messages for roitte alerting instructing i people to tune to local EBS station.
l
- 6. Develop and practice routes for siren back-up.
- 7. Emergency workers need training in use of KI. They also need the correct dosimetry equipment - TLD badges and low-range dosimeters.
' Darlington County I EOC The Darlington County EOC generally is a good facility staffed by j committed and competent personnel. The staff was mobilized as
- planned at the alert stage and present by the time site area emer-gency was declared. Most of the positions were double-staffed.
The County Chairman, Vice Chairman, or other Council members were in charge of the EOC as planned. The proper changes in emergencyThe I classification and protective actions were announced promptly.
EOC itself is very spacious, with all required maps and displays.
I Back-up power is being installed. Commercial telephone is the primary communicat' ions system, with radio back-up. The sirens used i to alert the public were sounded at 1115, eight minutes after the General Emergency declaration was received. County law enforcement personnel were aware of required traffic control and took what steps they felt they could to implement it, including re-routing the evacuation around a simulated train wreck.
Several inadequacies were observed. Not all roads leading to the evacuated areas,were blocked because County law enforcement per-sonnel did not have sufficient deputies available. No list of the mobility-impaired exists for e:vacuition assistance, and the staff ,
i
- I was unaware of efforts to solicit the public to come forward. l I
l were d.) toCounty (J.10 not personnel were unaware that-student bus drivers be sent into the EPZ to evacuate schools, and would I have done so if the State controller had not corrected them. Only l
- eight telephone lines are available in the EOC for at least This i eighteen agencies; each agency needs at least one telephone.
is a repeat inadequacy from 1983. Dosimetry-for emergency workers is insufficient; permanent record devices and low or mid-range, self-reading devices are needed. (K.3.a.) Briefings of the staff were not frequent enough and, when they did occur, did not involve most of the agencies. This capable staff would have performed better if each knew what the others *were doing.
4 _
I
,i.
Outside Activities
>l The Darlington Raceway Reception Center and Decontamination Station
- processed twenty-one sixth grade students from the Pate Elementary
- i School through monitoring, registration, and shelter assignment.
1
' l Monitoringgenerallywasadequatealthoughsomemoni(orsdemonstra-ted their responsibilities in a cursory manner. Instrument probes j were not covered and soles of students' shoes were not checked.
! Vehicular monitoring was accomplished in a perfunctory manner. Dis-cussions with the RADEF officer in charge indicated that a more thorough monitoring would have been done had it not been rainy
- weather. Six monitors were utilized for the personnel monitoring.
Several members of the Hartsville Fire Department were available with equipment for washdowns.
j The Department of Social Services provided about sixty staff members j to register the twenty-one students and assign them to shelters.
Red Cross and Salvation Army representatives were present as well as i two deputies from the Sheriff's Department. The registration and shelter assignment operation was accomplished smoothly. Staff ;
appeared knowledgeable and supplies were either on-hand or readily available.
)
i Areas Recommended for Improvement: ;
i l
- l. In the EOC, a map should be devoted to tracking the wind i
direction and' plume. This would enable the EOC staff to better visualize necessary protective actions.
l
- 2. A telecopier should be acquired for the PIO to transmit and receive news releases and EBS messages. Far too much of the PIO's valuable time was spent hand copying and readying re-l leases over the telephone.
- 3. Refresher , training for radiological monitors.
- 4. Additional trained monitors. TheWeCounty would now has only about suggest a minimum of seven trained staff available.
. fifteen.
- 5. Add a nursing station to the Reception Center operation.
~
- 6. Obtain a formal agreement from the private property owner for the use of the dirt road adjacent to the Darlington Raceway and for drawing washdown water from the pond and stream on the same property. -
=
h g p-i. , --. - --c - , - - - - --w-p . s -,,_-y.
,. q , , - r p_ ., e -- r 7-___ y..,,,,_-. -,,,.ww ,-_-,.9y-- p
1 :
i 1
- 7. Roads leading into the evacuated area were not blocked because insufficient County law enforcement personnel were available, and state assistance was not requested because it was thought not to be available. This is contrary to
) l i page Q-28 of the County Plan.
- 8. County personnel were unaware until told by the Controller '
i that school buses were not to be driven back int 6 the EPZ I by student drivers (see page Q-25 of County Plan).
- 9. Only eight telephone lines were available for at least eighteen staff positions. This is insufficient.
- 10. Frequent briefings involving the whole s'taff are needed.
I Lee County 1 EOC The demonstration of activation and staffing was promptly and l
l effectively implemented according to planned procedures. Double J staffing was used to demonstrate 24-hour staffing. In general, the staff was adequately trained and the exercise situation was effectively used to train new, inexperienced staff. Command and control was clearly demonstrated. Overall, the facilities were l i very good. Ample working space was provided for each county function. Briefings were generally. adequate and participation of each agency in these briefings shou'Id be continued. All communi- H l
cations systems were functional and effective. Public Both primary and alerting, through '
secondary systems'were demonstrated.
siren activation, was promptly inplemented according to planned g procedures. However, EBS public instructions were never received i
or validated. The acquisition of a fax system should be consid-ered for receipt of public instruction and emergency messages., l The County should develop an accounting of mobility-impaired and I special needs persons as well as procedures for informing and protecting these individuals. (J.10.d.)
Information transmitted to Lee County from the FEOC requires coor-
^
dination, promptness and improvement. The consistent use of i message forms should be implemented and message drafting time
! should be rn auced. The players demonstrated some reluctance and lack of experience in requesting additional help when problems
) arose.
J
.=
6
Outside Activities The personnel decontamination center, along with the Reception /
Congregate Care Center was located in the Mt. Pleasant High School.
It was directed by a person from the Red Cross from Sumter and staffed with volunteers from the Lee County Health Department who have received training in personnel radiation monitoring. Approxi-mately thirty students from the high school acted as evacuees. Two i staff persons monitored the evacuees in the entrance to'the gym.
I They were equipped with survey meters that they received at the county EOC. Those evacuees that were found to be clean were directed through a hallway to the reception desk of the congregate care center; l
l those that were simulated to be contaminated were directed around the outside of the gym to the girls or boys shower room where they were told to take a shower.
Aside from the survey meters the decontamination center had no sup-plies or equipment. There was no protective clothing'for the monitors, no bags for contaminated clothing, no bags for valuables and no paper for pathways. The monitors surveyed quickly, approxi-mately three per minute, but not thoroughly. The only communica-tions available was a commercial telephone located in the principal's office.
The Mt. Pleasant High School gym is an adequate decontamination center physically; however, it is not well equipped. It is recommended that the radiation monitors have protective clothing, that there be large; bags for radioactive waste, that there be small bags for valuables,' and that there be better communications so that the staff can more quickly contact ambulances, buses, and hospitals.
Also, it is recommended that the staff receive more thorough train-ing. ,
Lee County demonstrated the operation of a relocation center having both reception and congregate care functions at the Mt.3 Pleasant High School approximately twelve miles south of Bishopville. Six workers from the Lee County Department of Social Services registered non-contaminated evacuees, simulated by students, using a standard l Red Cross form. These workers were college graduates in social
> work or allied' fields and could provide social pervices to evacuees.
Also on site was the school nurse who could provide nursing services.
The physical facilities there were generally adequate for four i' hundred evacuees. There was food in the cafeteria for eight days, and more than enough' toilets and showers, clothes washers and dryers, and space. However, there were only two cots on site and no firm commitments for the supply of cots, although the Director from the Red Cross believed that cots could be obtained from Sumter. The principal of the high school was most cooperative and knowledgeable about the facilities at the high school. The principal thought the single-story building was accessible to handicapped persons and that ramps could be constructed quickly 2 in the woodshop if needed. The relocation center suffered from the j same minimal communications facilities as the decontamination ;
center, located on the same site, namely, only commercial telephone. )
1
, i 1
l It is recommended that a commitmeni. be obtained for cots and that communications be improved.
l Lee County appears to have adequate equipment and vehicles for evacua-tion and traffic control. The County Department of Transportation has sixty-nine school buses, each with a capacity of fifty-four persons. Rescue has access to twenty ambulances, and the County and Bishopville Public Works Departments have a variety of vehicles which can be used for enhancing traffic flow during an evacuation.
l For example, such equipment could be used to create a bypass around a traffic obstruction.
i There are weaknesses in radiation protection afforded emergency
, workers. They are to be issued, at the Cou'nty EOC, only mid-range and high-range dosimeters. Also, it was not clear that emergency workers from support agencies such as Public Works would be fully l informed about the need to obtain dosimetry at the EOC before going into the field. Emergency workers in the field (access control, de-j con) require permanent record devices. (K.3.a.)
There are no standard procedures for the evacuation of mobility-It impaired and other persons with special transportation needs.it re-appears that the County would merely react to requests that ceived by telephone.
. It is recommended that emergency workers, especially from support agencieu, receive more training in radiation protection.
1 The medical support activity in Lee County was excellent. The hospital staff was-well trained to handle a contaminated patient.
All precautions were taken to make sure no equipment or areas were contaminated. If the injuries were minor, decontamination took place first. If, however, the injuries were seyere, the victim was treated first, taking care to isolate contamination to a small area.
Areas Recommended for Improvement: .
- 1. The operations officer should delegate some of his tasks to others, e.g., the reception of phone messages.
- 2. Acquire fax facilities for hard-copy dissem'ination of messages. l
- 3. Acquire permanent-record dosimeters.
- 4. Better use of status boards to document protective actions implemented.
- 5. Additional training and familiarization with planned procedures is needed.
- 6. Acquire equipment and supplies noted above for the relocation ,_
~
and decontamination centers, and
- give all staff more thorough training.
7----------
Traffic and Access Control The South Carolina Highway Patrol has an excellent written plan for executing their traffic and access control responsibilities.
Areas Recommended for Improvement: $
- 1. Radiological training for all emergency workers.
- 2. Evacuation route signs could reduce the number of personnel required for TCP duty.
Fire Activity The Hartsville Fire Department responded to a fire drill conducted on site and participated with the on site Fire Brigade. Response time was good, however, the unit was delayed for twelve minutes at the entrance gate by security personnel. This dela'y could be serious in the event of a real fire. Firefighters arrived on the fire scene properly equipped with turnout gear and air masks.
Proper procedures were followed in contacting the Brigade Leader and offering assistance as needed'. The off site department demon-strated the ability to provide valuable assistance in extinguishing l a fire on site.
It is strongly suggested that procedures for prompt entrance to the fire area be established to prevent costly delays.
l Medical Drill Immediately upon being advised of a contamined/ injured person at the plant, the staff at the Byerly Hospital Emergency Room began preparations for receiving the patient. The hospital staff also obtained all relevant information, both medical and radiological, so that they could be fully prepared to administer I
to the needs of the patient. Communications were monitored between the hospital and the ambulance while the patient was enroute. The licensee maintains an emergency locker at the hospital emergency room which contains all the necessary equipment for personnel moni- l toring and decontamination.
After arriving at the site, the staff adequately demonstrated the medical and appropriate health physics techniques for the simulated contaminated / injured emergency.
Subsequent to administering to the medical and radiological needs of the simulated patient, the licensee and hospital staff initiated clean-up procedures to restore the facility to e radiologically .=
clean area. These procedures included the following, all of which were adequately demonstrated: recofding and maintaining a permanent record of radiation exposure data; conducting continuous
radiological surveys and the performance of a final survey; adher-ing to sound health physics practices in monitoring and decon-taminating the patient; using proper techniques for collecting and handling contaminated waste materials; and using appropriate techniques for removing anti-C clothing.
The staff at the Byerly Hospital is adequate in size,' well trained in radiological considerations,'and has all of the necessary equip-ment to perform personnel monitoring and decontamination.
l l
J .
I.
6 B
9 4
1 t
4
i -
16-III.
SUMMARY
LISTING OF INADEQUACIES
~
Corrective Date of NUREG Item Action Completion Facility Deficiencies None Areas Requiring Corrective Actions E.6., Notification Training and Media Center Methods and Procedures Drill G.4.b., Public Educa- Training and tion and Information Drill
-' G.4.c., Public Educa- Training and tion and Information Drill Chesterfield E.6., Notification Training and County Me-thods and Procedures Improvement of l ,
EBS Procedures K.3.a., Radiological Equipment Exposure Control Acquisition J.10.d., Protective Compile List of Response Mobility-Impaired i
Darlington J.10.d., Protective Compile List of County Response Mobi,lity-Impaired l K.3.a., Radiological Equipment Exposure Control Acquisition l
Lee County K.3.a., Radiological Equipment Exposure Control Acquisition J.10.d., Protective Compile List of Response Mobility-Impaired l
.J a
,_ .- -. ---n- -
9 e
i i 4
APPENDIX A i
G 4
u e
FEDERAL EVALUATOR ASSIGNMENTS
' H. B. ROBINSON EXERCISE .
October 22,.1985 s
CHIEF OF EVALUATORS AND RAC CHAIRMAN Glenn Woodard (FEMA)
} STATE FORWARD EOC - DARLINGTON John Heard (FEMA) i Bob Trojanowski (NRC)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
- Tony Foltman (FEMA)
Jim.Nagle (FEMA)
DARLINGTON COUNTY l Ed Tanzman (FEMA)
Tom Hawkins (FEMA)
Russ Yarbrough (FEMA)
LEE COUNTY Phil Kier (FEMA)
Jim Levenson (FEMA) .. j
. MEDIA CENTER
.. 1 Cheryl Stovall (FEMA)
MOBILE EVALUATORS Al Hall (DOT )
Tom Hawkins (FEMA) a
- 2.
6
-~ -- --, _ . . _ _ , _ _ _ .
6 s
a t
e i
e g
APPENDIX B i
e t
r .)
D I
l e
L i
i l l
1 l
l l
1 i
l l
l l
l l
4rc Gli t Statt of Coutl] Garolina D
! Siliturg Department &
OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL i t estow umacaA=2 August 2, 1985 M AJOR GENERAL IME ADJUTANT GENERAL
)1 l
l Mr. Glenn C. Woodard, Chief i Natural & Technological Hazards Division FEMA, Region IV 1371 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Dear M d:
In accordance with Section N, NUREG-0654, the purpose / scope and l exercise objectives for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Station Partial participation exercise to be conducted.33' October 1985 are attached. LL l
' Sincerely, th .
Jo a P. Moore D rector JPM:WMMc:ews 1
Attachments e
\
Emergency Preparedness Division Rutledge Building 1429 Senate Street Columbia, South Casolina 29201 (803) 758 2826
1 l-I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE On 23 October, 1985, a partial participation emergency preparedness exercise will be conducted at the, H. B.
Robinson Nuclear Station to test the capabilities of the affected counties and the basic elements of the emergency response plans. The simulated test will require the mobili- ,
zation and the deployment of local response forces and a i limited deployment of state forces in support of the l l
affected counties.
The exercise will determine the ability of the utility, state and local governments to work efficiently under ; ,
Qualified Federal and State Evalua-emergency conditions.
tors will determine the strengths and weaknesses of the response forces, and the deficiencies will form the basis ,
for corrective actions. !
l I
II. SPECIFIC EXERCISE OBJECTIVES The State of South Carolina The State of South Carolina will deploy a small detachment.
of personnel to the Forward Emergency Operation Center in l Darlington, S. C. This detachment of personnel will be i
i sufficient to adequately test direction and control, j implementation of emergency action levels, protective action recommendations and Tcommunications between the utility and j the three affected counties. .
Darlington, Chesterfield and Lee Counties
(
- The affected counties within the 10-mile EPZ of the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Station will exercise their emergency response plans with the following objectives.
- 1. Demonstrate ability to mobilize staff and activate facilities promptly.
- 2. Demonstrate ability to fully staff facilities and i maintain staffing around the clock.
l 3. Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency activities.
- 4. Demonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support emergency operations.
- 5. Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations, and field personnel. . .:
\
l l _- _
- 6. Demonstrate ability to alert the public within the 10-mile EPZ, and disseminate an initial instructional j message, within 15 minutes.
- 7. Demonstrate ability to ' formulate and distribute appro-priate instructions to the public, in a timely fashion. t
- 8. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to deal with impediments to evacuation, as inclement weather or traffic obstructions.
- 9. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to control access to an evacuated area.
- 10. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of mobility----impaired individuals within the plume EPZ.
- 11. Demonstrate the organizational ability and resources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation ~ of schools within the plume EPZ.
- 12. Demonstrate ability to continuously monitor and control emergency worker exposure.
I 13. Demonstrate ability to brief the media in a clear, accurate and timely manner.
- 14.
- Dbmonstr. ate ability to provide advance coordination of a
information released. l
- 15. Demonstrate ability to establish and, operate rumor control in a coordinated fashion. I i
- 16. Demonstrate adequacy of procedures for registration and radiological monitoring of' evacuees.
- i
- 17. Demonstrate adequacy of facilities for mass care of evacuees.
- 18. Demonstrate adequate equipment and pr'ocedures for decontamination of emergency workers, equipment and vehicles. ,
l ,
l
- 19. Demonstrate adequacy of ambulance facilities and '
procedures for handling contaminated individuals.
- t a
- 3. c m. . n o u-
. g) u She f> tate of South Guraltna jg )
ARiittary Bepartment
[
OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL t astoN WA4 CHANT September 10, 1985 n.ca cent =At THE ADWTANT GENERAL Mr. Glenn C. Woodard, Chief Natural & Technological Hazards Division FEMA, Region IV 1371 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta Georgia 30309 l
)
. l
Dear odard:
f In accordance with Section N, NUREG-0654, the exercise scenario for the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Station partial participation I
exercise to be conducted 22 October 1985 is attached.
l Sincerely, shua P. Moore D ector JPM:BMc:ews l
- 1:
Emergency Preparedness Division nutieoge suisoing 1421geoeie street Columbia, South carolina 29201 (403) 758 2826
H. B. ROBINSON FULL SCALE LOCAL EXERCISE 22 OCTOBER 85 i -
\
l SEQUENCE OF EVENTS DATE 22 OCTOBER 85 TIME EVENT 0825 UNUSUAL EVENT 0915 ALERT 1030 SITE AREA EMERGENCY 1230 GENERAL EMERGENCY l
1500 TERMINATION 8
DATE 23 OCTOBER 85 )
0900 CRITIQUE :
DARLINGTON NG ARMORY ,
l FEOC i i
- W I
a I
- ~ ~ -
f
SCENARIO H. B. ROBINSON FULL SCALE LOCAL EXERCISE (PARTIAL PARTICIPATION)
On October 22, 1985, Unit 2 is at 100% power and has been operat-g ing at 100% power for 63 days.
0800 - A Chemistry technician transporting a RCS sample, drawn a
.f normal daily sample, trips and suffers a compound fracture to the lower right arm. The sample spills and contami-nates the wound and the surrounding area. The technician l
An UNUSUAL requires treatment at an off-site facility.
l EVENT should be declared based on transportation of a ;
contaminated' injured individual from site to off-site l l hospital.
J e HBR Notification to off-site EMS / RESCUE Unit.
l
' $ e HBR Notification to DHEC.
l e EPD Notifies Darlington, Lee & Chesterfield Counties.
e o EPD Notifies Governor's Office - Adjutant Generals Office.
j 0845 - Unit 2 experiences a turbine trip due to a feed regulating value malfunction. Process radiation mpnitors indicate an increase due to a small amount of fuel damage caused by l l the trip transient.
. 0915 - R-9 let down line monitor has increased 6R in 30 minutes.
An ALERT should be declared based on a change in R-9 in 30 1
minutes greater than 5 R/hr. u
' o HBR Notifies DHEC. ,
I o EPD Notifies Chesterfield, Lee and Darlington Counties.
' o EPD Notifies Governor's Office, o EPD Notifies other State Agencies.,
o EPD Establishes SEOC for operation. $
e EPD Deploys FEOC to Darlington NG Armory. (The FEOC will be prepositioned prior to exercise.)
e FEOC Assumes control at approximately 0945-1000.
e Counties notifies EOC staff to report.
e Counties establish EOC's for operation.
e Media center activated. ,
)
e All PIO's dispatched to Media Center.
l 1000 - A fire breaks out outside the Water Treatment Building where hydrazine drums are stored. Off-site assistance should be called to help put out the fire. The fire continues to burn until personnel arrive from off-sitt fire department.
o HBR Notifies off-site fire department.
1030 - R-9 let down line monitor has continued to increase and is i now reading 31 R/hr. A SITE AREA EMERGENCY should be l
declared based on let down line. R-9 greater than 30 ,
i j
R/hr. !
l e HBR Notifies DEEC at FEOC.
l e DilEC Driefs EPD on situation.
i ~
e.. Sirens.in 10-mile EP3 activated.
e Joint Media Center EBS mescage to general public.
. t.
6 I
o 2-mile Traffic Control Points established. (SC Highway Patrol) o Counties place Reception Centers / Shelters on stand-by.
e C unties place decontamination points on stand-by.
e Precautionary 2-mile EPZ evacuation if necessary.'
1230 - R-9 Let down line monitor is now off-scale high. A GENERAL EMERGENCY should be declared.' Based on core / containment status, a protective action recommenda-tion should be made to evacuate 2-mile radius and 5-miles downwind.
- Shelter remainder of 10-mile EPZ.
e HBR Notifies DHEC at FEOC. l e DHEC advises EPD of situation and conveys any protective action recommendations.
e EPD notifies Chesterfield, Darlington and Lee Counties and
)
conveys any protective action recommendations. (Evacuk-l tion and/or In-place Sheltering).
e Sirens activated. (Simulated) o Joint Media Center EBS message to general public.
(Simulated) e Counties, open and staff Reception Center / Shelters.
e Counties open and staff Decontamination tations.
i I,
5
- i-l
- CP&L Recommendation l
- _-_ _ - ., - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _