ML20199G694
| ML20199G694 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1985 |
| From: | Scinto J NRC |
| To: | Livermore H, Shao L NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197J178 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606260189 | |
| Download: ML20199G694 (1) | |
Text
op
\\r~
bCS s
.m Note to Herb Livermore y#
t
/ 3/8/85 V 0
(&s h
p
)h s "u p ) /)
3M Larry Shao t
9 g
r
/,
Frcm Joe Scinto 7 M j
( g# ~
r\\+,h p J \\.1.
h f f
() }
tv n
(
iV JL f/
Re: Comanche TRT SSERs J
\\/t 7,
During our discussions of the Mech / Piping work and the QkQC work, we pointed out a number of inconsistencies between the Mech / Piping work and the QA/QC work. This note is to make sure that you are aware of these points and assure that they are resolved.
The principal points involve:
Mech 2(AQW 30) vs QA/QC AQ 7 relating to the Stanford NCR
- = = ~
w (Mech looks more comprehensive)
%T Mech 43 v d E E 3 11ner plates
[D R lE6 T
--[V" %
Mech 10 vs QA/QC AQ 61 gouged pipe g
_Y4 4 PM \\ 6 T fl M In addi A/QC design QA s eview by Terao, Landers,and Chen.
1 d addition, QA/QC AQ35 appears inconsistent with-@fds.d5with 1,
respect to use of irs vs NCRs.
(
=
r*._r
-^
>< 'P. " *',
1
" n. Iyf.
cc: VNoonan g 62g 9 860611 i
STreby GARDEBS-59 b
PDR s
~
_ _, _.. - - - - - - - ~ ~
__