ML20199G641

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 850207 Interview of Alleger A-6 Re Feedback on Technical Review Team Investigation of Technical Issues Raised.Issue AE-29 Discussed in Sser 7 (NUREG-0797)
ML20199G641
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 03/13/1985
From: Poslusny C
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59, RTR-NUREG-0797, RTR-NUREG-797 NUDOCS 8606250314
Download: ML20199G641 (2)
v • d • e


Text

. - . - . - -

w - -

..... ~T~~ls I # UNITED STATES o o,,

I g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p 5 4 E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 1 *%...../

! MAR 13 19st ir Docket No.: 50-445/446 MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. hoonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM: Chet Poslusny, Project Coordinator Comanche Peak Technical Review Team

SUBJECT:

FEEDBACK INTERVIEW WITH ALLEGER A-6 On February 7,1985, Alleger A-6 was interviewed by telephone by TRT members John Zudans, Mark Eli, Vernon Watson, Victor Wenczel, Bob Harbron, and Herb

Livermore. The purpose of this interview was to provide feedback on the TRT's investigation of technical issues raised by this alleger (AQ-22, AQ-27, AQ-33,

]i and AQ-50). A copy of the NRC's January 8, 1985, letter to TUGC0 describing the QA/QC deficiencies and corrective action required was mailed to the alleger.

l; Regarding issue AE-29 which was discussed in SER NUREG-0797, Supplement No. 7, a copy of the SER was mailed to the alleger.

, Regarding his concerns on intimidation and harassment, a copy of NRC Report 84-007 was mailed to the alleger.

The alleger was satisfied with the TRT's investigative results. No further work is contemplated on these issues.

}

Ch(itPoslusny,Td SAA r ject Coordinator Comanche Peak Technical Review Team cc: D. Eisenhut B. Hayes M. Kline -

I Docket Files 50-445/446 l

l -

)

i

)

8606250314 860611 4 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR L -

. _ . z ___ _

i . . . .

n g

g

(

9 1

Docket Mos: 50 445/446

(

MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM: Herbert H. Livermore, QA/0C Group Leader ,

Comanche Peak Technical Review Team  ;

SUBJECT:

' CASE LETTER TO GEARY S. MIZUNO REGARDING ANI REPORTS AT COMANCHE PEAK A CASE letter of August 14; 1984, provided Mr. Mizuno an example of a Comanche i Peak Class II pipe support that was upgraded to Class I. The subject ANI j Report 371 (Exhibit 1056) was reviewed by the TRT while on-site at Comanche Peak. The information provided in those do:uments did not alter our assessment and conclusions in AQ 12 and 13, which considered the same subject. The TRT QA/QC Group investigated the program and procedures for upgrading material. ANI Report 371, besides addressing materia.1 upgrading, specifically alleged that welder identification was not traceable on the subject supports. This area was in the purview of the TRT Mechanical Group, j for which I cannot speak.

1 1 A. Vietti again forwarded the CASE /Mizuno letter, plus some 36 ANI reports to

} the QA/QC Group for review in' November. The subject ANI reports span a period i of 1982-1983 and, as the CODE requires, a report to TUEC on the status and/or l problems encountered with specifics in the TUEC ASME QA/QC Program. The TRT J QA/QC Group has reviewed these ANI reports and notes that although we did j not address the same specifics, our assessments and conclusions in the SSERs a include the same type of problems and examples. The review did not alter our

'i assessment. Since we did not address the same specifics noted in the ANI reports, our SSERs will not reference any specific ANI report number.

Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team cc: C. Hale

{ A. Vietti 4

QA/QC Group 0FC :TRT  :  :  :  :  :  :

4 NAME :HLivermore: -

.____:.___......_pf, _:.._____,___:___________:-________..:____________:___________.:__.________

DATE :2/ /85  : . '/. 3  :  :  :  :  :

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

[-~_L'__ . _1_ L_ -N- " '

- _ , .c. ,, -

i.

o- 6

" e6,(,*s ,, o UNITED STATES o NilCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5, A . .< I ,

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 ggf g

%:..../ u ; ,, + %)y l M. i Note to: Herbert Livennore g i QA/QC Group Leader T' i From: T. R. Workinger, TRT Sfl$f 1 I

Subject:

Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 Reference to QA/QC SSER  ;

I have gone through Supplement No.7, " Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Programs", and Supplement No. 8. " Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous f Issues", to identify references to related issues that are stated to be, or I are implied to be, further addressed in the QA/QC SSER, which you are preparing. The related reference issues are highlighted in yellow in the enclosed copies of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

The principle issues and page numbers are also identified in Attachment 1.

Those page numbers that are marked with an asterisk also commit the NRC to the ,

preparation of an additional supplement to complete the evaluation of an issue 1' in the respective individual SSER -- based, in part upon the findings of the j

QA/QC Group. Note, however, that only the issue of page J-33, electrical- -

[

cable tray support welds, is specifically addressed in the QA/QC draft SSER. - ,

Cross reference to the QA/QC SSER contained in the Test Programs and  :

Miscellaneous sections of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 do not appear to present any ,

problems. t s >

'x

~

. T.R.Workingek '

[

c: w/ attachment 1  !,

~

Mg Keimig F0 A-85-59 l

' Hunter onan .

l

% e i s , w , n, .

[" * , 3~ . *,m\ C /Of(% 77W a'. -

I f

I

'. [ .

s G ?\ (

L(. ,, :  : .. .

~

c;, ; '.R R

f.:; W Q * . g Q % .,

f..; ; 3 . ' [ _.; Q

=: ,

l

.- q -

l .

1 3 .

s 4 ,

", -,. ,, _ R. -

f nany'o,, -*

UNITED STATES

! r. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ e. ,

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 *

~

\*****/ M 8 1985 i Note to: Herbert Livemore QA/QC Group Leader From: T. R. Workinger TRT ,

Subject:

Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 Reference to i QA/QC SSER .

A I have gone through Supplement No.7, " Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Programs", and Supplement No. 8. " Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous Issues", to identify references to related issues that are stated to be, or I(

are implied to be, further addressed in the QA/QC SSER, which you are preparing. The related reference issues are highlighted in yellow in the [

enclosed copies of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

The principle issues and page numbers are also identified in Attachment 1.  !;

Those page numbers that are marked with an asterisk also comit the NRC to the I preparation of an additional supplement to complete the evaluation of an issue i in the respective individual SSER -- based, in part upon the findings of the  !

QA/QC Group. Note, however, that only the issue of page J-33, electrical i cable tray support welds, is specifically addressed in the QA/QC draft SSER.

Cross reference to the QA/QC SSER contained in the Test Programs and i-Miscellaneous sections of Supplement Nos.~7 and 8 do not appear to present any f problems. , ,

a

(

i jfh)Q 1

{

i T.R.Workingek f l

! c: w/ attachment 1 i J. Calvo -

r' L. Shao

  • t.C. Tang Keimig

. Hunter -

~onan

?NY0 h'

r y

-[

. . . .. ...m. .

.... ,e

. ,a t.

$ ~g J

% en.

  • e'

'~

M

m m ,. . s -- - :n .

, ., m m--a m 1 -

~

m H

~

l 0

Attachment 1 l 1

Supplement No. 7 - i Electrical / Instrumentation und Test Program

{

Page No. Reference Issue f

J-9(J-W Lack of programmatic control of the electrical QC inspection qualification program, which may be indicative of inadequate ,

also qualification for some electrical QC inspectors. (QA/QC J-58 Category 4 " Training and Qualification").

J-14 $J-I The TRT cannot conclude with reasonable assurance that the J-95 document control system problems had no adverse effect on testing activities.

J-16 This action shall be integrated with other actions concerning J-65 craft personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8 "As Built".

J-33 The inspection of electrical cable tray support welds is addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As Built". t

[

J-33 The lack of awareness of procedures by craft personnel [QC J-35 inspectors] may be indicative of poor training in the area of-J-43 procedural requirements. Similar findings in other -

construction crafts are addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As

, Built".

J-47 The TRT further concludes that the lack of analysis to L.

substantiate the adequacy of the seismic design installations '

inspected may be a weakness in the QA/QC program concerning .

. design control. This area is addressed under QA/QC Category 1, L

! " Design Process". ,

l J-53 */ The results of this evaluation [ disposition of electrical (

l nonconformance reports] will be further assessed as part of i the overall programmatic review of all NCRs, addressed under '

QA/QC Category 5 "Nonconformance Reports", and under Category 6 "QC Inspections." [

This area [ cable splices in raceways] is furtter addressed i

i J-59 r l under QA/QC Category 8, "As Built". _

l *j Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/0C Group. '

I L

l I I m-e.-t*-m - w ee weee4p.

  • M- _

,n. , . - = . . .. ,. . ,- -

1 1

l 2  !

Page No. Reference Issue J-66 */ The results of this evaluation [ electrical equipment i installation pioblems] will be further assessed as part of the i overall programmatic review concerni19 the post-construction 1 verification program addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As ,

Built". '

J-68*/ The results of this evaluation [ electrical irs and IRNs] will ,

be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review of TUEC's deficiency identification program in-process inspections addressed under QA/QC Category 5 "Nonconformance .

Reports".  !

J-88 The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate b qualifications of preoperational test personnel [not qualified [

to ANSI N45.2.6 standards] will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed -

under QA/QC Category 4, " Training and Qualification". l i

. i l

l

. A

[

l:

l . I l T l t l

l J

  • /

Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon I the findings of the QA/QC Group.

I l^ *

. - a

~=:-- n -r- __ . =, ,, -

~. -

~

~

Supplement No. 8 Civil and Structural and Miscellaneaus Issues Page No. *teference Issue I K-37 The statement in Attachment D [to the CASE letter of 11-20-84]

that all retesting which had been promised had not been carried '

out is a quality assurance matter, not a safety problem, and it will be investigated by the TRT QA/QC Group.

K-38 / The results of the evaluation pertaining to the placement of K-42 concrete without QA/QC involvement, the response for improving i protection when field-cured cylinders showed inadequate j strength, and the failure to carry out promised retests will be c further assessed as part of the overall review concerning [

procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6, "QC Inspections".

K-45 The TRT ... found no evidence of grout failure. The K-47 possibility of premature loading will be assessed as part of I the overall programatic review concerning procedures addressed  !

under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections". o ej V K-561 The results of these evaluations which pertain to QC rebar  !

K-91 ; placement and receipt inspection procedures [and unauthorized I rebar cutting] will be further assessed as a part of the  ;

overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed  :

under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections". j K-58*/ The lack of QC inspection [ uncontrolled repair] will be further [

assessed as a part of the programmatic review concerning  ;

procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6, "QC Inspections".  ;.

  • L K-69 j The results of these evaluations [R.W. Hunt inspector  !

qualification] will be further assessed as a part of the j overall programmatic review concerning inspector qualifications i addressed under QA/QC Category 4, " Training and Qualificctions".  ;

The effectiveness of quality control in the [ Hunt concrete K-74h K test] laboratory will be further assessed as part of the  :

overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed i under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspections".

K-128 These findings are based on the technical assessment performed by the Miscellaneous Group; some of these findings appear to lJ differ from those made by the TRT's QA/QC Group, which evaluated the same components from a different technical perspective.

t

  • / Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon i the findings of the QA/QC Group.

~

~

,.y --- g-

.- - -- m- .

_3; ,r_, v5-- ,

1

$lEEGO

~

.ff Io 'g UNITED STATES y g NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION g j WAsmNGTON, D. C. 20555

% . . . . . ** MAR 151985 MEMORANDUM FOR: T. R. Workinger, TRT FROM: -D. C. Jeng, Civil / Structural Subgroup (

Comanche Peak TRT

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT NO. 8 REFERENCES TO QA/QC SSER j

REFERENCE:

March 8,1985 Memo from T. R. Workinger to H. Livermore,

, QA/QC Group Leader f

! f The Civil / Structural Staff has reviewed the list of issues requiring further i QA/QC review as identified by you from the Civil / Structural SSERs in A Supplement No. 8 (Attachment 1 to the reference). We believe that this list should be expanded to include the five additional issues provided in the enclosure to this memorandum. If you have any questions, please contact  ;

T. Langowski at 443-7966 or D. Jeng at 443-7974. ,

j i

as c D. C. Jeng, C ructural  ;

Subgroup, TRT i

Enclosure:

As stated I

?

cc: w/ encl.  !

V. Noonan J. Calvo '.

L. Shao  !

l R. C. Tang l l R. Keimig l H. Livermore-D. Hunter l

R. Philleo j C. Hofmeyer i J. Devers T. Langowski - -

l I

l by A ufn A *140 l wi ' V T 'T ' '

l. -

t

1 o e e w~ , w w w-g - . - - - - - . . . , , - - - . . ----e

..w--=..y _ w.% . < = . -

. m . - _-.. ~ . .. _

-m

.m. ,

'I,,

y Y

ENCLOSURE 4

pp K-29 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to lack of laboratory signatures on batch tickets will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review ,concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

pp K-42 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate consoli- I dation of concrete will be further assessed as part of the over-  !

all programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC  !

Category 6 "QC Inspection." l i

pp K-64 */ The results of these evaluations pertaining to QC inspection l procedures (falsification) will be further assessed as a part {

of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed i under QA/QC Category 3 " Records". i pp K-84 This (control room ceiling design) would indicate failu're of the  !

quality assurance program to ensure that applicable provisions j of Regulatory Guide 1.29 were fully met. j pp K-96 */ The results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the 5 batch plant will be further assessed as part of the overall i programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC  !

Category 6 "QC Inspection." >

  • / Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group. j i

i l

I

=

\

l d

-c  ;

i E

=

?)

n-

- . .. -.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20199G641&oldid=3335715"