ML20199G146

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Oversights & Ommissions Identified in Ssers 7 & 8 Re Qa/Qc Group Effort.Assistance in Initiating Corrective Actions So That Comanche Peak Technical Review Team Suppls Will Be in Agreement Requested
ML20199G146
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 06/11/1986
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250101
Download: ML20199G146 (10)


Text

I -

o J'

I A /s pe Me*4 UNITED STATES i

  • j NUCLEAR REGULATOnY COMMissl0N i

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20596 e...*

i i

i MEMORANDUM FOR:

V. Noonan, Project Manager Comanche Peak TRT FROM:

H. Livemore. QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

OVERSIGHTS AND OMISSIONS IN SUPPLEMENT NOS. 7 AND 8 RE QA/QC Enclosed are oversights and omissions we have identified in SSER Nos. 7 and 8 as they pertain to the QA/QC Group effort. These fall into two categories:

(1) statements that specific issues will be covered in the QA/QC SSER, when in actuality they have not, and (2) allegations or concerns that were transferred from the QA/QC Group to the Electrical / Instrumentation, Civil / Structural Test Programs, and Miscellaneous groups but whose assessment was not included in Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

With this memo I am requesting assistance in initiating action to correct these oversights and omissions so that all TRT supplements will be in agreement. Regarding the reference (1) above, I recommend the issue of an errata for Mos. 7 and 8 correcting the references, or a statement in the QA/QC supplement addressing these references, the latter being preferred. To correct the omissions, (2) above, I recommend they be included in subsequent supplements by these groups which I understand is,being anticipated.

f

' Since the QA/QC Group SSER is near final completion, I request your timely action on these items.

r

&t44v2 si H. H. Livemore

~

QA/QC Group Leader

Enclosure:

As stated Q

I cc: All TRT Group Leaders i

A. Vietti

[

g s

m w, ese.,,

e CARDEBS-59 PDR

.(y, d

1 ll!

,. m

-:n

. 7

?

s t

ATTACHMENT 1.'

The following are pages and actions that Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 state the i

QA/QC Group has taken or will take, but that the QA/QC Group has not taken nor plan to take.

J-16(1st1)

... integrated with other actions concerning cr:ft i

J-65 (1st 1) personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8, i

'As-Built' 1

j The QA/QC Group does not address craft personnel training.

1 a

J-43 (1st 1)

... weakness in the... design control...is addressed in QA/QC Category 1,...."

8

!]

Not fully addressed in Category 1.

i l

J-43(5th1)

... poor QC personnel training... addressed under QA/QC Category 6.,.."

QC personnel training is not addressed in Category 8, and electrical QC is not addressed in QA/QC at all.

J-47 (3rd 1

... weakness in... design control... addressed under QA/QC h

andlast1)

QA/QC Category 1,...."

L; Not fully addressed and no actions are required.

h l

J-50(1st1)

"For detailed discussion of the 'T-shirt' incident, see g"

QA/QC Category 6,...."

i The QA/QC discussion is not detailed.

l li-J-58 (3rd 1)

... electrical QC inspector training and qualification j;

will be further assessed under QA/QC Category 4,...."

lj Elictrical QC inspector training, etc. is not addressed by j-QA/QC.

N Jj J-59 (6th 1)

"This area (electrical splices) is further addressed under l

QA/QC Category 8,...."

3 Electrical splices are not addressed in any QA/QC Category.

i.

7 b

.l Attachment J-68(4th1)

...results...will be further assessed (deficiency identification program)...under QA/QC Category 5...."

Category 50 does not address the deficiency identification program.

1

]1 J-95(1st1) reference QA/QC Category 5, ' Document Control'..."."

j Minor error, Document Control is Category 2.

K-11 (4th 1) the results of the evaluations for Categories (Civil /

Structural) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,15, and 17 are being further assessed by the QA/QC Group...."

l In the broadest sense, only C&S Categories 7 and 8 may be

]

construed to have been included in the QA/QC assessments.

K-29 (4th 1) the lack of laboratory (concrete) signatures will be j

further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

]

Category 6 has no such assessment.

J l

K-37(1st1) all retesting (Sche.idt hanner)...will be investigated by ll K-38 (1st 1) the TRT QA/QC group."

QA/QC did r.o investigation of retests, procedure, etc.

N 4

4 1

K-42(last1)

(procedures for) consolidation of concrete will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

h 1

Procedures nor other issues associated with concrete or its j

consolidation were assessed by QA/QC.

a K-47 (1st 1)

(procedures for) premature loading (of grout) will be assessed...under QA/QC C1tegory 6...."

Such procedures, etc. were not assessed by QA/QC.

i K-56(1st1)

QC rebar placement and receipt inspection procedures will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

QA/QC has not assessed rebar placement or inspection procedures.

__NA..

L.m d__.

__-_._e-.-

Y

-^

" A

r 1

r.

Attachment,

4 K-65(5th1)

...QC inspection procedures will be further assessed...

under QA/QC Category 3,...."

This general reference is not inaccurate, but Category 3 is the wrong category.

I K-69(3rd1)

...results of these evaluations will be... assessed... con-2 cerninginspectorqualifications(intheareaofconcrete tests)...under QA/QC Category 4,...."

i e

Such evaluations have not been conducted.

!i y

K-74(1st1)

...qualitycontrolinthelaboratory(concrete)willbe j

further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

l Such assessments have not been made, i

K-91(1st1)

...these evaluations (cut rebar) will be further assessed l

...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

h Such evaluations have not been made, s

K-96 (2nd 1)

...results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the batch plant will be further assessed...under QA/QC i

Category 6....."

i ll-No such evaluation has been made.

e n.

l.

4 1-}

lit b

4

' - - ~ -

y a

\\~e f

Attachment 2.

The QA/QC Group transferred 18 AQ-numbers to others during the course of our assessment. These are listed below, but as indicated many have not been addressed in the issued SSERs, Nos. 7 and 8.

k OdQ wg Y JY 1

, to Civil /5L o iural, but not in Supp. 8

ger,

, to Piping / Mechanical i

to Office of Investigation

[

M, to Office of Investigation M to Office of Investigation j

AQD.B - M, to Coatings Group l

9 g/M -

, to Piping / Mechanical %,/, *w Me.-

j Ac.-yf -ho Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 N

AC W, 4::fL -g, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 j

Ag ff0 - % to Misc. Group, but not in Supp 8 7-

, to Civil / Structural, assessed on p. K-93 of Supp. 8

' /* O

, to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7

- Mo Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 N to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 L

Mnot an allegation, but used as OI tracking I

M to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 S

- M to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 g

' @ o Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 g,

, to Office of Investigation n

b a

l N'

1 i

1

.y

or s

V /w 4,

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATOnY COMMisslON a

g WAsmNcTON, D.C. 20556 E

[

l MEMORANDUM FOR:

V. Noonan, Project Manager Comanche Peak TRT FROM:

H. Livemore, QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

OVERSIGHTS AND OMISSIONS IN SUPPLEMENT N05. 7 AND 8 RE QA/QC

  • \\

Enclosed are oversights and omissions we have identified in SSER Nos. 7 and 8 i

as they pertain to the QA/QC Group effort. These fall into two categories:

1

- (1) statements that specific issues will be covered in the QA/QC SSER, when in actuality they have not, and (2) allegations or concerns that were transferred from the QA/QC Group to the Electrical / Instrumentation, Civil / Structural, Test Programs, and Miscellaneous groups but whose assessment was not included in Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

With this memo I am requesting assistance in initiating action to correct these oversights and omissions so that all TRT supplements will be in agreement. Regarding the reference (1) above, I reccennend the issue of an errata for Nos. 7 and 8 correcting the referencas, or a statement in the QA/QC supplement addressing these references, the latter being preferred. To L

correct the omissions, (2) above, I recommend they be included in subsequent

(

supplements by these groups which I understand is being anticipated.

Since the QA/QC Group SSER is near final completion, I request your timely action on these items.

-?!3W

%)

g A

/

5 y2

~

m ff l"

3 L :

,,.z. ' ^

.am.<

.u U Nk 4

L>

'.,4.

~~ ~

T. L

~

ATTACEENT 1.

The following are pages and actions that Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 state the

[

QA/QC Group has taken or will take, but that the QA/QC Group has not taken nor plan to take.

I J-16(1st1)

... integrated with other actions concerning craft i

J-65(1st1) personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8,

'As-Built'."

l The QA/QC Group does not address craft personnel training.

l 1

J-43(1st1)

... weakness in the... design control...is addressed ' n QA/QC i

]

Category 1,...."

Not ful.ly addressed in Category 1.

J-43(5th1)

... poor QC personnel training... addressed under QA/QC Category 8...."

QC personnel training is not addressed in Category 8, and electrical QC is not addressed in QA/QC at all.

J-47 (3rd 1

... weakness in... design control... addressed under QA/QC andlast1)

QA/QC Category 1,...."

l Not fully addressed and no, actions are required.

I J-50(1st1)

"For detailed discussion of the 'T-shirt' incident, see QA/QC Category 6,...."

h

(

The QA/QC discussion is not detailed.

l 0

J-58(3rd1)

... electrical QC inspector training and qualification f

will be further assessed under QA/QC Category 4...."

i l

Electrical QC inspector training, etc. is not addressed by QA/QC.

1 l

J-59(6th1)

"This area (electrical splices) is further addressed under QA/QC Category 8,...."

iI-Electrical splices are not addressed in any QA/QC Category.

4 W

n._

I V'

~ _

~

QW M

f 95-()) of (1 f

(

~

  • \\

@# 6 %~'

Attachment.

[

I J-68(4th1)

...results...will be further assessed (deficiency identification program)...under QA/QC Category 5....."

j Category H does not address the deficiency identification

  • Yh d

d9 % - m o

Ij J-95(1st1)

... reference QA/QC Category 5. ' Document Control'...."

j Minor error Document Control is Category 2.

4 K-11 (4th 1)

"...the results of the evaluations for Categories (Civil /

Structural) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,15, and 17 are being further assessed by the QA/QC Group...."

In the broadest sense, only C&S Categories 7 and 8 may be i

construed to have been included in the QA/QC assessments.

1 K-29(4th1)

...the lack of laboratory (concrete) signatures will be j

further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

i J

Category 6 has no such assessment.

)

l K-37(1st1)

...all retesting (Schmidt hanner)...will be investigated by K-38 (1st 1) the TRT QA/QC group."

k QA/QC did no investigation of retests, procedure, etc.

K-42(last1)

...(procedures for) consolidation of concrete will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

s t

Procedures nor other issues associated with concrete or its j

consolidation were assessed by QA/QC.

I l

K-47(1st1)

...(procedures for) premature loading (of grout) will be l

assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

i l

Such procedures, etc. were not assessed by QA/QC.

f K-56(1st1)

...QC rebar placement and receipt inspection procedures

[

will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

l QA/QC has not assessed rebar placement or inspection g

procedures.

~.

7 Attachment '

t k

~

K-65(5th1)

...QC inspection procedures will be further assessed...

under QA/QC Category 3...."

This general reference is not inaccurate, but Category 3 is f

the wrong category.-

I K-69(3rd1)

"..results of these evaluations will be... assessed... con-l cerning inspector qualifications (in the area of concrete i

i tests)...under QA/QC Category 4....."

i A

Such evaluations have not been conducted.

l

?

I K-74(1st1)

... quality control in the laboratory (concrete) will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6....."

Such assessments have not been made.

l

\\

l K-91(1st1)

...these evaluations (cut rebar) will be further assessed

...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

l Such evaluations have not been made.

K-96(2nd1)

...results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the batch plant will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

No such evaluation has been made.

i i

Q l

1 I

i

~

N t.

22

.<s 1.

1, -

4

-(

i 4

l Attachment t

[

2.

The QA/QC Group transferred 18 AQ-numbers to others during the course of i

our assessment. These are listed below, but as indicated many have not i

been addressed in the issued SSERs Nos. 7 and 8.

i Od%

AQ-1, to C;.;1/5i..-.ial, but not in Supp. 8

{

AQ-2, to Piping / Mechanical i

AQ-8 to Office of Investigation AQ-10, to Office of Investigation AQ-11, to Office of Investigation A

AQ-29, to Coatings Group l

AQ-39, to Piping / Mechanical l

AQ-56, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 L

AQ-62, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 AQ-63, to Misc. Group, but not in Supp 8 i

AQ-64, to Civil / Structural, assessed on p. K-93 of Supp. 8 AQ-66, to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-67, to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 l

AQ-81, to Electrical /Instrunentation, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-84, not an allegation, but used as 0I tracking i

AQ-92, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-93, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-94, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-118 to Office of Investigation

?

i l

l I

g r,

y v

g 4--. --

4

- + - -