ML20199G146

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Oversights & Ommissions Identified in Ssers 7 & 8 Re Qa/Qc Group Effort.Assistance in Initiating Corrective Actions So That Comanche Peak Technical Review Team Suppls Will Be in Agreement Requested
ML20199G146
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 06/11/1986
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250101
Download: ML20199G146 (10)
v • d • e


Text

I -

o _ , . J'

  1. I A /s
  • jpe Me*4 .

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATOnY COMMissl0N i

i WASHINGTON. D. C. 20596

e...*

i i

i MEMORANDUM FOR: V. Noonan, Project Manager Comanche Peak TRT .

FROM: H. Livemore. QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

OVERSIGHTS AND OMISSIONS IN SUPPLEMENT NOS. 7 AND 8 RE QA/QC Enclosed are oversights and omissions we have identified in SSER Nos. 7 and 8 as they pertain to the QA/QC Group effort. These fall into two categories:

(1) statements that specific issues will be covered in the QA/QC SSER, when in actuality they have not, and (2) allegations or concerns that were transferred from the QA/QC Group to the Electrical / Instrumentation, Civil / Structural Test Programs, and Miscellaneous groups but whose assessment was not included in

. Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

With this memo I am requesting assistance in initiating action to correct these oversights and omissions so that all TRT supplements will be in agreement. Regarding the reference (1) above, I recommend the issue of an errata for Mos. 7 and 8 correcting the references, or a statement in the QA/QC supplement addressing these references, the latter being preferred. To correct the omissions, (2) above, I recommend they be included in subsequent supplements by these groups which I understand is ,being anticipated.

f ' Since the QA/QC Group SSER is near final completion, I request your timely

action on these items.

r

. &t44v2 si H. H. Livemore

~

QA/QC Group Leader

Enclosure:

As stated I cc: All TRT Group Leaders A. Vietti i Q g .,

[

s -

m w , ese.,,

CARDEBS-59 PDR e

.(

y, -

d 1

ll! .

. . , . . . . ,. . . . . ..., ,. m -:n ., . . - . - . 7

?

s t .

ATTACHMENT 1.' The following are pages and actions that Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 state the i QA/QC Group has taken or will take, but that the QA/QC Group has not taken nor plan to take.

J-16(1st1) "

... integrated with other actions concerning cr:ft i J-65 (1st 1) personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8, i 'As-Built' 1

j The QA/QC Group does not address craft personnel training.

1 a

J-43 (1st 1) ... weakness in the... design control...is addressed in QA/QC 8 Category 1,...."

] Not fully addressed in Category 1.

i l J-43(5th1) "

... poor QC personnel training... addressed under QA/QC Category 6 .,.."

QC personnel training is not addressed in Category 8, and electrical QC is not addressed in QA/QC at all.

J-47 (3rd 1 ... weakness in... design control... addressed under QA/QC h andlast1) QA/QC Category 1,...."

L; Not fully addressed and no actions are required.

h l J-50(1st1) "For detailed discussion of the 'T-shirt' incident, see g" QA/QC Category 6,...."

i The QA/QC discussion is not detailed.

l li- J-58 (3rd 1)

... electrical QC inspector training and qualification will be further assessed under QA/QC Category 4,...."

j; l

j Elictrical QC inspector training, etc. is not addressed by j- QA/QC.

N J

j J-59 (6th 1) "This area (electrical splices) is further addressed under l QA/QC Category 8,...."

3 Electrical splices are not addressed in any QA/QC Category.

i. .

7 b _

.l Attachment .  !

J-68(4th1) "

...results...will be further assessed (deficiency identification program)...under QA/QC Category 5 ...."

Category 50 does not address the deficiency identification program.

1

]1 J-95(1st1) "

. . . reference QA/QC Category 5, ' Document Control'..."."

j Minor error, Document Control is Category 2.

K-11 (4th 1) . . . the results of the evaluations for Categories (Civil /

Structural) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,15, and 17 are being further assessed by the QA/QC Group...."

l In the broadest sense, only C&S Categories 7 and 8 may be

] construed to have been included in the QA/QC assessments.

K-29 (4th 1) . . . the lack of laboratory (concrete) signatures will be j further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6 ...."

] Category 6 has no such assessment.

J l .

K-37(1st1) . . . all retesting (Sche.idt hanner)...will be investigated by ll K-38 (1st 1) the TRT QA/QC group."

! QA/QC did r.o investigation of retests, procedure, etc.

N ,

4 4 1 K-42(last1) "

. . . (procedures for) consolidation of concrete will be '

further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

h 1

! Procedures nor other issues associated with concrete or its j consolidation were assessed by QA/QC.

a K-47 (1st 1) . . . (procedures for) premature loading (of grout) will be assessed...under QA/QC C1tegory 6...." -

Such procedures, etc. were not assessed by QA/QC.

i K-56(1st1) . . . QC rebar placement and receipt inspection procedures will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

QA/QC has not assessed rebar placement or inspection procedures. ,

_ -_ __NA.. L.m d__. __-_._e-.- - - . Y -^ " A

1 r .

r.

, Attachment 4 K-65(5th1) "

...QC inspection procedures will be further assessed...

under QA/QC Category 3,...."

This general reference is not inaccurate, but Category 3 is the wrong category.

I 2

K-69(3rd1) "

...results of these evaluations will be... assessed... con-cerninginspectorqualifications(intheareaofconcrete tests) ...under QA/QC Category 4,...."

i e Such evaluations have not been conducted.

i y K-74(1st1) "

...qualitycontrolinthelaboratory(concrete)willbe j further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

Such assessments have not been made, l

i K-91(1st1) ...these evaluations (cut rebar) will be further assessed l ...under QA/QC Category 6,...."

Such evaluations have not been made, h

s ,

K-96 (2nd 1)

...results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the batch plant will be further assessed...under QA/QC i Category 6....."

i ll- No such evaluation has been made. -

e n.

l.4 1-

}

lit b

4

' - - ~ -

y a ,

\~e $

f Attachment 2. The QA/QC Group transferred 18 AQ-numbers to others during the course of our assessment. These are listed below, but as indicated many have not

., been addressed in the issued SSERs, Nos. 7 and 8.

k 1 OdQ

, to Civil /5L o iural, but not in Supp. 8 wg Y JY

, ger, , to Piping / Mechanical i to Office of Investigation

[ M , to Office of Investigation M to Office of Investigation j AQD .B - M, to Coatings Group l 9 g/M - , to Piping / Mechanical  % ,/, *w Me.-

j Ac.-yf -ho Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 N AC W, 4::fL -g, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 j Ag ff0 - % to Misc. Group, but not in Supp 8 7- , to Civil / Structural, assessed on p. K-93 of Supp. 8

' /* O , to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7

- Mo Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 N to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 L Mnot an allegation, but used as OI tracking I

M to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 S - M to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 g ,

' @ o Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 g, , to Office of Investigation n

b .

a l N' 1

i 1

.y

- or

. s V /w 4, .

    1. * %, UNITED STATES g a NUCLEAR REGULATOnY COMMisslON WAsmNcTON, D.C. 20556 E

[

MEMORANDUM FOR: V. Noonan, Project Manager l

Comanche Peak TRT FROM: H. Livemore, QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

OVERSIGHTS AND OMISSIONS IN SUPPLEMENT N05. 7 AND 8 RE QA/QC

  • \

i Enclosed are oversights and omissions we have identified in SSER Nos. 7 and 8 1 -

as they pertain to the QA/QC Group effort. These fall into two categories:

- (1) statements that specific issues will be covered in the QA/QC SSER, when in actuality they have not, and (2) allegations or concerns that were transferred from the QA/QC Group to the Electrical / Instrumentation, Civil / Structural, Test Programs, and Miscellaneous groups but whose assessment was not included in Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

With this memo I am requesting assistance in initiating action to correct these oversights and omissions so that all TRT supplements will be in agreement. Regarding the reference (1) above, I reccennend the issue of an errata for Nos. 7 and 8 correcting the referencas, or a statement in the QA/QC supplement addressing these references, the latter being preferred. To L correct the omissions, (2) above, I recommend they be included in subsequent

( supplements by these groups which I understand is being anticipated.

Since the QA/QC Group SSER is near final completion, I request your timely action on these items.

-?!3W g  :  %)

/ 5- ~

y2 A

. m l" 3 -

L :

ff

,,.z. ' ^

.am .<

.u U Nk %

4 L> '.,4. . . . , . . _ . ~~ ~' : T. L '-. * ~

ATTACEENT l

1. The following are pages and actions that Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 state the

[ QA/QC Group has taken or will take, but that the QA/QC Group has not taken nor plan to take.

I J-16(1st1) "

... integrated with other actions concerning craft i

J-65(1st1) personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8,

'As-Built'." .

The QA/QC Group does not address craft personnel training.

l l .1 J-43(1st1) "

... weakness in the... design control...is addressed ' n iQA/QC Category 1,...."

]

Not ful.ly addressed in Category 1.

J-43(5th1) ... poor QC personnel training... addressed under QA/QC Category 8 . . . ." -

QC personnel training is not addressed in Category 8, and electrical QC is not addressed in QA/QC at all.

J-47 (3rd 1 ... weakness in... design control... addressed under QA/QC andlast1) QA/QC Category 1,...."

l Not fully addressed and no, actions are required.

I J-50(1st1)

"For detailed discussion of the 'T-shirt' incident, see QA/QC Category 6,...."

h

( The QA/QC discussion is not detailed.

l 0

J-58(3rd1) "

... electrical QC inspector training and qualification f will be further assessed under QA/QC Category 4 ...."

i l Electrical QC inspector training, etc. is not addressed by 1

QA/QC.

l J-59(6th1) "This area (electrical splices) is further addressed under QA/QC Category 8,...."

i I- Electrical splices are not addressed in any QA/QC Category.

4 W

n._ I

V'

~ _ _ ___ _

~ . .. . .

QW M

( ~

f 95-()) of (1 f Attachment

*\ @# 6 %~' .

[

I J-68(4th1) "

...results...will be further assessed (deficiency -

identification program)...under QA/QC Category 5....."

j Category H does not address the deficiency identification I

d9 % - m o - d *Yh l j ,

J-95(1st1) ... reference QA/QC Category 5. ' Document Control'...."

j Minor error Document Control is Category 2.

4 .

K-11 (4th 1) "...the results of the evaluations for Categories (Civil /

Structural) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,15, and 17 are being further assessed by the QA/QC Group...."

  1. In the broadest sense, only C&S Categories 7 and 8 may be i construed to have been included in the QA/QC assessments.

1 K-29(4th1) "

...the lack of laboratory (concrete) signatures will be j further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6 ...."

i Category 6 has no such assessment.

J

)

l K-37(1st1)

...all retesting (Schmidt hanner)...will be investigated by K-38 (1st 1) the TRT QA/QC group."

k QA/QC did no investigation of retests, procedure, etc.

K-42(last1) "

...(procedures for) consolidation of concrete will be

! further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

s t Procedures nor other issues associated with concrete or its j consolidation were assessed by QA/QC.

I l K-47(1st1) "

...(procedures for) premature loading (of grout) will be l assessed...under QA/QC Category 6...."

i Such procedures, etc. were not assessed by QA/QC.

l f

. K-56(1st1) ...QC rebar placement and receipt inspection procedures

[

will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6 ...."

QA/QC has not assessed rebar placement or inspection l

  • procedures. -

g

~. - . - -

7

!! Attachment '

t k .

~

K-65(5th1) "

...QC inspection procedures will be further assessed...

. under QA/QC Category 3 ...."

This general reference is not inaccurate, but Category 3 is the wrong category.-

f ,

I K-69(3rd1) " ..results of these evaluations will be... assessed... con-cerning inspector qualifications (in the area of concrete li i tests)...under QA/QC Category 4....."

i A Such evaluations have not been conducted.

l

?

I K-74(1st1) "

... quality control in the laboratory (concrete) will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6....."

Such assessments have not been made.

l

\

l K-91(1st1) ...these evaluations (cut rebar) will be further assessed

. . .under QA/QC Category 6, . . . ."

l

! Such evaluations have not been made.

K-96(2nd1)

...results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the batch plant will be further assessed...under QA/QC Category 6 ...."

No such evaluation has been made.

i i

Q l

1 I

i

~

N .

t. . _ 22 .<s . 1. . 1 , - ,_ .,.

4

-( .

i -

l Attachment , . 4 t

[ 2. The QA/QC Group transferred 18 AQ-numbers to others during the course of i our assessment. These are listed below, but as indicated many have not i been addressed in the issued SSERs Nos. 7 and 8.

i Od%

AQ-1, to C;.;1/5i..- .ial, but not in Supp. 8

{ AQ-2, to Piping / Mechanical -

i . AQ-8 to Office of Investigation AQ-10, to Office of Investigation AQ-11, to Office of Investigation A AQ-29, to Coatings Group l AQ-39, to Piping / Mechanical l AQ-56, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 L -

AQ-62, to Civil / Structural, but not in Supp. 8 -

AQ-63, to Misc. Group, but not in Supp 8 i AQ-64, to Civil / Structural, assessed on p. K-93 of Supp. 8 AQ-66, to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-67, to Electrical / Instrumentation, but not in Supp. 7 l AQ-81, to Electrical /Instrunentation, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-84, not an allegation, but used as 0I tracking i AQ-92, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-93, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-94, to Test Programs, but not in Supp. 7 AQ-118 to Office of Investigation

? .

i l

l

' I g r, y v g 4-- . -- -:, 4 - - + - -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20199G146&oldid=2998840"