ML20199G575

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lists Three Items Identified as Being Applicable to Qa/Qc Group in Response to 850503 Request for Review of Allegations
ML20199G575
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 05/28/1985
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250277
Download: ML20199G575 (3)


Text

w n .: . -- - .-. .. .-

~

f. , . ,

MAY 2 8 I!Ei s

MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director 4 Comanche Peak Project FROM: Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

. RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS

[

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items 2 were' identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

p Item No. 17: "NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection." g t

This testimony was not related to the TRT, but l 4

involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor, Smith and Gilbert).

No TRT action required. g Item No. 2: "ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

Root." n This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months but was not rejected. The TRT hr.d already looked at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQ5). -

No TRT action required.  ?

Item No. 9: "NRC was not finding the problem."

"NRC was not investigating all allegations." -

"NRC was not monitoring construction." i The testimony indicates that the subject was y Regi6n IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT. p

! No TRT action required.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, and the other one has already been add ssed. i eb

-QA/QC Group Leader

(

i cc: C. Poslusny ,

i'"= A a m -

0FC :CP

.__________ l?=g Mh - ,

..,. ll 4_4. Q m .. y _

-NAME :HLivermore:pf 8606250277 86061 ,

FO '

_____:.___________:______PDR cp PDR ---_ .------------:------- - -- --

.DATE :5 M S  :  :  :  :  :

'E

~ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

/f m _ __L1 , ,_ _

.< > - - s_ _

- -~, _ = , _ :i - _

~ n

-- . r T

a -

8  % UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h

  • WASHING TON, D. C. 20556 j
    • ,.... S 28 M _

[ _

i .

MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan Director Comanche Peak Project ':

FROM: Herbert H. Livermore '

QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS 4 As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the 7 listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These /(

three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results: -

Item No. 17: "NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection."

f This testimony was not related to the TRT, but -

.I involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e., i Taylor Smith and Gilbert). I f

No TRT action required. J $

~

f:

Item No. 2r "ASME audit team rejected ASME'N-Stamp for Brown & E '

Root." f.

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's?

N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months '

but was not rejected. The TRT had already looked ,

at this subject and it'is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).  ;

No TRT action required. [

l-Item No. 9: "NRC wa:: not finding the problem." L l

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."  :-

l "NRC was not monitoring construction." l The testimony indicates that the subject was -

[

Region IV personnel (i.e. Taylor) not the TRT. ,-

j No TRT action required.  ; 2 ,

p E

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group. -

and the other one has already been addressed. L W c/t.

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader _ .

cc: C. Poslusny ,

[ l 1. . I - --

'~~

-___ - _.. - -____ _-. . . <- is nA: ,- =~ x: --

e  :  :

/,

- i u gw>

~ - '

OM NU -

= r w.

l

- .e . m .

MhG

&4  % .,a. .

a,64 jj)&

& Ju. iia %.. tk s-- )' **#$ - .

Qg Nk? s.  %&: 09"esic Z osef* Tuaw

& Y l Y am. AC~3A

So " & r e.

<.c.:i..u

,k.a.. v. nos n n/ ~ s ,c.q.-

d

~

^D Q 9 's x 6 : D m - r S S. 1. I L Y .

i , , , ... noe..no amwii .

I L - -

t_, d For Genremo. Per Commesuen /~.

As noeuested For DersueMon Propese Asper . $, l '

N ror v., w n s is.  :

m .. .

M ' '

invesuesto C :^_ ; -v I i M p.. 7

t. Desament

.E. g ' aa'-

.ht  !

()6,Q ,

. 71,- cW/6/> e j*/f 4 A,fs- l t.

a.ss,c a u:4 4;<v.a H a c. M &Lan. .

W^' ~ . .

' Q.2 f ,, ~n ~. c . c . ~ G i. w . ,

em y 'M is Y r==44 caMosek. '

/

./

fi,.mhmfb e4,Aaseunu m k=)m L,L canoesel,e cues osewee useskluf.e k s nR.s

-=-A. 4 et<,

p.J,*

a s  :

  1. q~1 4 4 . ,

L j.

. ase 4 4 .

e M ovevs=ei d essohn ea., d 'ans k e k' ~ *vt= af h +i . y n A; ~

% !s , ' WG. aw. AseAC.g&m m --- _% e,e.Meo i i; s- gomi.d s~ a ora,,- p 'c t e s t en -

O 'd*4 <f "M Cfm]sfloww awwwe~ ef 4ts

  • g j f)- .s ,50 S*

t

. m em e,runna .e,w .

e.is n,= = ---- . w- :_-=;=; -

- =-_. m. ._, - r-

~-

p

'l FRotL (NWie, erg. s (, Ag.ncy/ Plast) . Room No.-Stdg. _

'.y 1

,' @G 'e-

/

hf , _

J ses:-see

+; ., O.PT.I.ONAL p mas er ee FOftM

, Pressima crus s.n a.:taas 41 St.v.-. o-7-79 -

e so , sens o - asi-s:s (see> .. u;c,5 [

- - . ..; n

. n , ,; . . . F

.a , 4 *

'^

t

}

< 8 ~ 1 .J F01A4fMs.

- 4 r '

V 7s- ..-

-.1..A_.._