ML20197J296
Text
'
,v-
- /pu n s%
Q a
- UNITED STATES y
E j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
L E.
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
%,*.c. /
R.M A
- TES 7 15 0/.c Lckb E (M W.:
,[\\
Docket Nos:
50-445/446 l"
rw MEFORANDUM FOR:
Vincent S'. Noonan, Director hkN Comanche Peak Project
[
FROM:
Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
SUBJECT:
CASE LETTER TO GEARY S. MIZUNO REGARDING ANI REPORTS AT COMANCHE PEAK A CASE letter of August 14, 1984, provided Mr. Mizuno an example of a Comanche Peak Class II pipe support that was upgraded to Class I.
The subject ANI 1
Report 371 (Exhibit 1056) was reviewed by the TRT while on-site at Comanche
~ Peak.
The infomation provided in those documents did not alter our assessment and conclusions in AQ 12 and 13, which considered the same subject.
The TRT QA/Oc crnuo investigated the program and nrne=d"*a< for
. upgrading material / ANI Report 371, pesides addressing material upgrading, specifica ly alleged that welder identific3.tjon _was__not traceable, on the subject supports.
(forwhichIcannotspeak.This area ~was th the purview of the TRT Mechanical Gro A. Vietti again forwarded the CASE /Mizuno letter, plus some 36 ANI reports to 1
the QA/QC Group for review in November. The subject ANI reports span a period of 1982-1983 and, as the CODE requires, a report to TUEC on the status and/or problems encountered with specifics in the TUEC ASME QA/QC Program. The TRT QA/QC Group has reviewed these ANI reports and notes that although we did not address the same specifics, our assessments and conclusions in the SSERs include the same type of problems and examples. The review did not' alter our assessment.
Since we did not address the same specifics noted in the ANI reports, our SSERs will not reference any specific ANI report number.
/NtY Z'H'<P2 U erbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team i
l l
cc:
C. Hale A. Vietti l
GA/QC Group V
85G3 5@355 Jp i
Xp 1
- - -